Hi Gour,

On 09.05.2013 10:33, Gour wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:50:07 +0100
Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote:

[...]
I settled to use SCons for my PyQt project and was reading the User Manual
yesterday and e.g. found that the email addresses listed are wrong (e.g.
us...@scons.tigris.org) which led me to check how are docs handled in order to
know how to contribute some 'patches'.

So, I was a bit surprised that SCons uses Docbook toolchain considering that
some time ago project switched from SVN to (more pythonic) Mercurial, I wonder
why not using (more pythonic) reST/Sphinx which, imho, requires less admin
work and it provides lower-hanging fruit for potential contributors who are
probably more familiar with reST/Sphinx than Docbook.

Moreover, the current user manual is ~350p and not so complicated to require
the above-mentioned features.

I hope that you will find this email only as constructive feedback meant to
improve SCons project by simplifying doc toolchain in order to spend valuable
time of not-to-big developer's team on more important issues.

thanks a lot for trying out the new doc toolchain. It's still very fresh and there's probably a lot of room for improvement...including a rewrite to another input format (like asciidoc, reST, whatever). So, we're very interested in hearing about first impressions from avid users like you.

If it were only about creating plain text with some graphics, you're right. This could easily be handled by a lot of other toolchains. However, I'd like you to have a short look over the discussion at

  http://www.scons.org/wiki/DeveloperGuide/Documentation

and

  http://www.scons.org/wiki/DeveloperGuide/Documentation/Discussion

, respectively. There is also a description of the current implementation in the file "doc/overview.rst". Together they might shed some light on why we (errm, I) finally chose Docbook.
If you have further thoughts or questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Thanks again for your feedback.

Best regards,

Dirk


_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Reply via email to