On Thu, 09 May 2013 23:55:02 +0200 Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote:
> that's okay...but to make me believe this as well, you (or someone > else) has to deliver actual results. ;) > As I stated before in this thread, as long as the same functionality > is kept regarding the automatic creation of examples (and the > generated list of tools and builders, while delivering the same > output formats we have now), a toolchain based on a Markdown > processor gets my full support. Being a little lazy and more tight with the time atm, here I provide some reference which does those things: http://pedrokroger.net/2012/10/using-sphinx-to-write-books/ > That's more because the stylesheets have been neglected in the past > (obviously nobody wanted to fiddle with DSSSL) and because parts of > the document processing relied on home-brewed SGML parsing without > proper support for XML. Like this, not all valid XML/Docbook > constructs would have worked, which held back people a little to use > the full power of the Docbook stylesheets. > This can (and hopefully will) change now... That's very cool - I never considered to fiddle with Docbook in pre-XML era. :-) However, it still does not make Docbook authoring easier as Russel wrote: "...I am a hater of humans having to read and write XML". :-) > Then just try to convert a few SCons documents with it, and send us > some selected pages (not the whole document!) of output samples. Please check Pandoc examples online - there are two involving Docbook under the section: 9. DocBook XML Sincerely, Gour -- Whatever action a great man performs, common men follow. And whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world pursues. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
