On 13.12.2014 18:00, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a side remark, as a former user of that wiki:
The issue is that most of it is outdated: refers to obsolete methods, uses
Python methods whereas there is now a SCons method, etc...
And even when it's not, readers don't trust fully what they see, because, well,
how can they know if this is still up to date or not?
And this is caused by the very use of a wiki to hold/update the data.
Whereas if all of this could be integrated in the **official** doc, and as
such, be maintained/updated to follow SCons evolution, it would bring much more
value to it.
Maintained and updated by *whom*? Do you volunteer? ;)
The intention of our Wiki is not to provide "official" documentation,
but to collect additional material (sources/docs)...that might once get
integrated into the core. But it's mainly there for the community (all
users), and it's in the state the community left it in. At least that's
the way I see it.
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
