I knew this was coming while writing it :-) But no, I must confess I'm not able to spend the time it deserves on this.
Le 13 déc. 2014 à 18:21, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> a écrit : > On 13.12.2014 18:00, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi, >> Just a side remark, as a former user of that wiki: >> The issue is that most of it is outdated: refers to obsolete methods, uses >> Python methods whereas there is now a SCons method, etc... >> And even when it's not, readers don't trust fully what they see, because, >> well, how can they know if this is still up to date or not? >> And this is caused by the very use of a wiki to hold/update the data. >> >> Whereas if all of this could be integrated in the **official** doc, and as >> such, be maintained/updated to follow SCons evolution, it would bring much >> more value to it. > Maintained and updated by *whom*? Do you volunteer? ;) > > The intention of our Wiki is not to provide "official" documentation, but to > collect additional material (sources/docs)...that might once get integrated > into the core. But it's mainly there for the community (all users), and it's > in the state the community left it in. At least that's the way I see it. > > Dirk > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
