On Saturday 03 January 2004 02:09, Rob Lazzurs wrote: <snip> > > Just IMHO, however I think you only have to have a look at the LUG > through in Edinbugger to find out why this is a bad idea. Sorry for > coming into this thread so late, I have been stuck on a windows machine > and I have just finally edited my muttrc to my liking again (usually I > use the most excellent evolution) > > Take care - RL Is Edlug currently tied up in commitee wars? I must try to get through to some more Edlug meetings, I enjoyed the couple that I did get to.
If we do have a committee, it will take some thick-skinned and determined folk on that committee to keep it running right. Organising geeks is like herding cats (apologies to whoever I stole that line off). We all think we are bright enough to think we know better and we will all have differeent ideas n direction and emphasis of anything we choose to do. That doesnt mean we shouldnt have sub-groups ( I hesitate to call them committees) for those interested in advocacy or Installdays or whatever. I'd like to hear a list of suggestions for sub-groups if anyone has any thoughts. Whether those sub-groups have themselves any kind of mutually agreed formal structure would be up to them. However from this we could have a mutually recognised ScotLUG spokesperson on advocacy for example. Just thinking out loud, keep kicking it around and we'll see what falls out. -- Best Regards Willie Fleming _______________________________________________ Scottish mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish