Andreas,

As a semi-professional snarky person myself, this is the risk you take when 
you post a snarky response. It's not the end of the world, nor are you 
being excommunicated from the SD Ruby community. Just get up, dust yourself 
off, and consider it a lesson learned.

Love,
Jarin

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:26:18 PM UTC-7, andreas_kirn wrote:
>
> Well, I've been a member of this community for 4 or 5 years, and right now 
> I feel anything but welcome :( 
>
> Andreas 
>
> On Sep 11, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Bradly Feeley <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
>
> > I don't think it's about political correctness, it's just about being a 
> community where people feel welcome. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Bradly 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Guyren Howe <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> >>> I share the concerns that others had about what Andreas wrote. 
> >> 
> >> I'm sorry but I (and apparently others who unfortunately have chosen to 
> only agree with me privately) am concerned about needless political 
> correctness in all this. 
> >> 
> >> I am still *completely and utterly mystified* about who would be 
> offended by what Andreas wrote and what about it was offensive. With the 
> best will in the world, I would be unable to avoid in future offending the 
> folks who were offended by this, without understanding what they found 
> offensive about it. 
> >> 
> >>> I share the concerns that others had about what Andreas wrote. 
> >>> 
> >>> - Would it be appropriate to ask these questions in person during a 
> job interview at HP? NO. 
> >>> 
> >>> - Was he really unsure if the job post was from the same HP that has 
> suffered losses and layoffs? NO. 
> >>> 
> >>> - Did he really care whether or not there was a ping-pong table? NO. 
> >>> 
> >>> While I think Andreas had no real interest in this job, even if he 
> did, his questions could have been phrased more professionally. Is this job 
> safe from the next round of layoffs at HP? Is there a fun, creative work 
> environment that maybe includes ping-pong tables? etc. 
> >>> 
> >>> Going forward, please email companies directly when replying to job 
> posts. (We may also create a jobs-only mailing list at some point in the 
> future too.) 
> >> 
> >> That the questions posed in Andreas' message were rhetorical tells me 
> nothing about why folks are offended by it. Rhetorical questions are 
> pervasive in discourse and clearly not offensive per se. If I was 
> interviewing at HP, one of my first questions would be about the company's 
> financial situation. 
> >> 
> >> This is not a rhetorical question, nor is it exaggeration: would 
> someone please explain to me who was likely to be offended by what Andreas 
> wrote and what it is that they would find offensive? Is it Mark? People who 
> might work at HP? People who are fans of the company? And is the offensive 
> content that it suggests such people would be an idiot for working there? 
> Or perhaps it seems to be laughing at the people who lost their jobs? I 
> really have no earthly idea. 
> >> 
> >>> Going forward, please email companies directly when replying to job 
> posts. (We may also create a jobs-only mailing list at some point in the 
> future too.) 
> >> 
> >> Alternatively, going forward, please refrain from being offended by 
> something written in a public forum unless it was clearly intended to be 
> offensive. I maintain that the questions raised (rhetorically, to be sure) 
> were likely to be of interest to other members of the community and were 
> therefore quite appropriate to air publicly. That you happen to dislike the 
> way it was expressed is not to my mind sufficient reason to start this 
> kerfuffle. 
> >> 
> >> The etiquette standards for an online community should be concerned 
> with anything that is clearly trolling or offensive. Please understand that 
> online communication is demonstrably informal and easily misunderstood, and 
> adopt an attitude of tolerance in your interpretation. This is much 
> preferable to having a community where everyone feels that they have to 
> walk on eggshells. 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> SD Ruby mailing list 
> >> [email protected] <javascript:> 
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby 
> > 
> > -- 
> > SD Ruby mailing list 
> > [email protected] <javascript:> 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby 
>
>

-- 
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby

Reply via email to