Re: How to clone backup to a tape?

2010-09-28 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
I don't know how you are going to use that tape, but you should consider to 
create a Backupset.


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Buddy 
Howeth
Sent: den 28 september 2010 10:11
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How to clone backup to a tape?

You will need to use a 3rd party utility to copy (clone) one tape to another.


Buddy Howeth
Computer Operations Specialist
Information Systems
Pacific Coast Producers
Corporate Offices
631 N. Cluff Ave
Lodi, CA  95240-0756
(209) 367-8800 - Main#
(209) 367-6288 - Computer Room
(209) 366-6240 - Alpha Pager





cc1702004 
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
09/27/2010 11:34 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] How to clone backup to a tape?






Hi,

I'm asked to clone data for a backup done sometime earlier to a tape. Is there 
anyone can advice me how do I clone the backup?

Thanks

cc1702004

+--
|This was sent by cc1702...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--

_
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit
http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/offerfamily/iss/a1026954
_

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Re: Ang: Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi Daniel,

It took a while before this email got published on adsm.org...

However, I read the message and I wanted to address the specific issue not the 
general one with people are complaining about restore times, which they often 
do.
To me the key sentence was "The server has a lot of files, almost 7 million 
including the copypool".
I'm sure we both would find a suitable solution even if we attacked the problem 
from different angles.


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel 
Sparrman
Sent: den 7 september 2010 22:44
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hi there Henrik

I asked a few questions to try to get a pointer.

Concerning my point on TSM performance, Nicklas was the one saying he had the 
organisation complaining on TSM for poor performance. Perhaps you should read 
his first message, and you'd understand why I said as I said. Scroll down this 
message and you will know what I'm talking about (last line)

Regards

Daniel

-"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  skrev: -


Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Från: Henrik Vahlstedt  Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 

Datum: 09/07/2010 09:44
Ärende: Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hi,

I am sure everything is configured correct at Niklas site. Test classic vs nqr 
restore and you will be suprised.


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel 
Sparrman
Sent: den 7 september 2010 09:40
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hi there

To begin with, TSM as a product has no issues with fast restores. If the data 
isnt placed correctly, restores might slow up though.

- Did you restore files or files and directories?
- Are you storing directories on tape or in a dedicated diskpool using DIRMC?
- Considering it was only 117 files, the average sice was 427KB. Are you using 
collocated tape pools, or is there a chance the files was spread across the 
tape?

When a restore takes this amount of time for just a small amount of size/files, 
it usually points towards files / directories being spread across the tape. 
Usually when doing restores of large fileservers (which I asume this is) 
sorting out what needs to be restored on the TSM server-side is what takes 
time, but since you got to "Waiting for files" pretty fast, I'd say you have 
files/directories spread widely across the tape.

Best Regards

Daniel Sparrman


-"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  skrev: -


Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Från: Niklas Lundström  Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor 
Manager" 
Datum: 09/07/2010 07:02
Ärende: 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hello

I just did a restore of 50Mb and it took 4h 18min If it had been 50Gb I 
wouldn't complain

Total number of objects restored:   114
Total number of objects failed:   0
Total number of bytes transferred:   50.99 MB
Data transfer time:9,426.15 sec
Network data transfer rate:5.53 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate:  3.36 KB/sec
Elapsed processing time:   04:18:55

The server has a lot of files,  almost 7 million including the copypool. The 
TSM DB is really big, 180Gb and 94% full.
TSM Server 5.5.4.

Does anyone have a clue of why the restore took so long?

It found what volumes to mount fast, but then the client was "Waiting for files 
from the server."

People here are complaining about TSM and that the restores takes long time and 
it's hard to defend it when the restore takes so long...


Med vänlig hälsning
Niklas Lundström


Niklas Lundström
Storage Administrator

Swedbank AB (publ)
105 34  Stockholm
Telefon: +46 (0)8 5859 5164
Mobil: +46 (0)70 24 76 345

Vi ber dig lägga märke till att detta e-postmeddelande kan innehålla 
konfidentiell information.
Om du felaktigt blivit mottagare av detta meddelande ber vi dig informera 
avsändaren om felet genom att använda svara-funktionen. Vi ber dig också att 
radera e-postmeddelandet utan att skicka det vidare eller kopiera det.
Trots att vi intygar att e-postmeddelandet och eventuella bilagor inte 
innehåller virus och andra fel som kan påverka datorn eller IT-systemet där det 
mottages och läses, öppnas det på mottagarens eget ansvar. Vi tar inte på oss 
något ansvar för förlust eller skada, som har uppstått i samband med att 
e-postmeddelandet mottagits och använts.
_

Please note that this message may contain confidential information. If you have 
received this message by mistake, please inform the sender of the mistake by 
sending a reply, then delete the message from your system without making, 
distributing or retaining any copies of it.
Although we believe that the message and any attachment are free from viruses 
and ot

Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

I am sure everything is configured correct at Niklas site. Test classic vs nqr 
restore and you will be suprised.


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel 
Sparrman
Sent: den 7 september 2010 09:40
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hi there

To begin with, TSM as a product has no issues with fast restores. If the data 
isnt placed correctly, restores might slow up though.

- Did you restore files or files and directories?
- Are you storing directories on tape or in a dedicated diskpool using DIRMC?
- Considering it was only 117 files, the average sice was 427KB. Are you using 
collocated tape pools, or is there a chance the files was spread across the 
tape?

When a restore takes this amount of time for just a small amount of size/files, 
it usually points towards files / directories being spread across the tape. 
Usually when doing restores of large fileservers (which I asume this is) 
sorting out what needs to be restored on the TSM server-side is what takes 
time, but since you got to "Waiting for files" pretty fast, I'd say you have 
files/directories spread widely across the tape.

Best Regards

Daniel Sparrman


-"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  skrev: -


Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Från: Niklas Lundström  Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor 
Manager" 
Datum: 09/07/2010 07:02
Ärende: 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hello

I just did a restore of 50Mb and it took 4h 18min If it had been 50Gb I 
wouldn't complain

Total number of objects restored:   114
Total number of objects failed:   0
Total number of bytes transferred:   50.99 MB
Data transfer time:9,426.15 sec
Network data transfer rate:5.53 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate:  3.36 KB/sec
Elapsed processing time:   04:18:55

The server has a lot of files,  almost 7 million including the copypool. The 
TSM DB is really big, 180Gb and 94% full.
TSM Server 5.5.4.

Does anyone have a clue of why the restore took so long?

It found what volumes to mount fast, but then the client was "Waiting for files 
from the server."

People here are complaining about TSM and that the restores takes long time and 
it's hard to defend it when the restore takes so long...


Med vänlig hälsning
Niklas Lundström


Niklas Lundström
Storage Administrator

Swedbank AB (publ)
105 34  Stockholm
Telefon: +46 (0)8 5859 5164
Mobil: +46 (0)70 24 76 345

Vi ber dig lägga märke till att detta e-postmeddelande kan innehålla 
konfidentiell information.
Om du felaktigt blivit mottagare av detta meddelande ber vi dig informera 
avsändaren om felet genom att använda svara-funktionen. Vi ber dig också att 
radera e-postmeddelandet utan att skicka det vidare eller kopiera det.
Trots att vi intygar att e-postmeddelandet och eventuella bilagor inte 
innehåller virus och andra fel som kan påverka datorn eller IT-systemet där det 
mottages och läses, öppnas det på mottagarens eget ansvar. Vi tar inte på oss 
något ansvar för förlust eller skada, som har uppstått i samband med att 
e-postmeddelandet mottagits och använts.
_

Please note that this message may contain confidential information. If you have 
received this message by mistake, please inform the sender of the mistake by 
sending a reply, then delete the message from your system without making, 
distributing or retaining any copies of it.
Although we believe that the message and any attachment are free from viruses 
and other errors that might affect the computer or IT system where it is 
received and read, the recipient opens the message at his or her own risk. We 
assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use 
of this message.

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Re: SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....SOLVED, but some questions

2010-09-07 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Good!

Instead of trying to explain this properly in an email I refer to the author of 
adsm quickfacts plus the BA client guide, Classic restore vs No Query restore. 
:)


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Niklas 
Lundström
Sent: den 7 september 2010 11:08
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18hSOLVED, 
but some questions

Thanks to Henrik Wahlstedt this got solved.

Henrik, tack för hjälpen och telefonsamtalet, jag har faktiskt inte fått nåt 
mail från dig...


Restore processing finished.

Total number of objects restored:   137
Total number of objects failed:   0
Total number of bytes transferred:   59.12 MB
Data transfer time:   42.65 sec
Network data transfer rate:1,419.17 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate:188.75 KB/sec
Elapsed processing time:   00:05:20


The first restore had the filespecification:
restore "\\fspas01cl001\z$\mpy-it\users\p950kaz\my pictures\pic\*"

If I changed it to  restore "\\fspas01cl001\z$\mpy-it\users\p950kaz\my 
pictures\pic\?*"
The client got direct "waiting for offline media" and started to restore the 
files after the tapes got mounted

So I tried again with only *, and got the same problem as before:

tsm> restore "\\fspas01cl001\z$\mpy-it\users\p950kaz\my pictures\pic\*"
tsm> c:\restored2\ -subdir=yes
Restore function invoked.

ANS1247I Waiting for files from the server...


Some questions:
Whats the difference between ?* and only *

Why don't I see a restore session when I ran q restore with the ?* filespec,
tsm: ADSM4>q restore
ANR2034E QUERY RESTORE: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

And the restore starts right away

When I run with only * I get this in the log:

2010-09-07 10:51:52 ANR1182I Removable volume 006811 is required for a restore 
request from session 2717.
2010-09-07 10:51:53 ANR1182I Removable volume 005763 is required for a restore 
request from session 2717.
2010-09-07 10:51:53 ANR1182I Removable volume 005902 is required for a restore 
request from session 2717.
2010-09-07 10:51:53 ANR1183I Initial determination of removable volumes 
required for a restore request from session 2717 is complete. Additional 
volumes may still be required.


tsm: ADSM4>q restore

  Sess Restore Elapsed Node Name Filespace FSID
Number State   Minutes   Name
-- --- --- - --- --
 2,717 Active   10 FSPAS01FS039  \\fspas01c-  1
  l001\z$\m-
  py-it





-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Remco Post
Skickat: den 7 september 2010 10:39
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Hi,

I'm sorry, but you are wrong, duplex mismatch Does cause the speed to drop to 
Aboutaleb 5K/s. I've Deen Thissen on numerous occasions.

--

Gr., Remco

On 7 sep. 2010, at 08:02, Niklas Lundström  wrote:

> I actually restored the files to my workstation, and the network
> settings are fine Duplex mismatch does not cause the speed to go down to 
> modem-speed from 1995
>
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Remco
> Post
> Skickat: den 7 september 2010 07:40
> Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h
>
> On 7 sep 2010, at 07:02, Niklas Lundström wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I just did a restore of 50Mb and it took 4h 18min If it had been 50Gb
>> I wouldn't complain
>>
>> Total number of objects restored:   114
>> Total number of objects failed:   0
>> Total number of bytes transferred:   50.99 MB
>> Data transfer time:9,426.15 sec
>> Network data transfer rate:5.53 KB/sec   <--
>> Aggregate data transfer rate:  3.36 KB/sec
>> Elapsed processing time:   04:18:55
>>
>> The server has a lot of files,  almost 7 million including the copypool. The 
>> TSM DB is really big, 180Gb and 94% full.
>> TSM Server 5.5.4.
>>
>> Does anyone have a clue of why the restore took so long?
>>
>
> your network sucks? (to put it mildly :) ) I'd check to see if there is any 
> mismatch in duplex settings anywhere. Remember, auto-negotiation on the host, 
> and a fixed 100 full-duplex setting on the switch will lead to a host at 
> half-duplex and tons of collisions.
>
>
>> It found what volumes to mount fast, but then the client was "Waiting for 
>> files from the server."
>>
>> People here are complaining about TSM and that the restores takes
>> long time and it's hard to defend it when the restore takes so long...
>>
>
> --
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,
>
> Remco Post

-

Persistent bindings and Linux

2010-07-13 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

How do you enable persistent bindings to tape devices in Linux with TSM. Is 
everyone using Sandiscovery or writing their own udev rules, other options?


Tia
Henrik




---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Re: Linux i/o schedulers and TSM

2010-05-03 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Opinions are good too, tnx for the answer!

However, I am surprised that the List don't have more opinions regarding I/O.


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of km
Sent: den 28 april 2010 10:23
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Linux i/o schedulers and TSM

I've done some test regarding this but it was a pretty long time ago so I don't 
have any results to share, sorry, just an opinion.


The default in RHEL is the CFQ scheduler which should be optimized for 
throughput which is what we want.

Your other choices would be:

deadlineif you need low latency
noopno scheduling at all

You should probably give atleast the noop scheduler a try if you have the time 
since it could be beneficial depending on your storage, otherwise CFQ is an OK 
general purpose scheduler.

-km

On 26/04, Henrik Vahlstedt wrote:
> God morning,
>
> Have anyone done performance testing with different i/o schedulers and rhel 5 
> and TSM db, log and stgpools, and have a result they would like to share? 
> Anyone with opinions regarding i/o schedulers or are we TSM admins happy with 
> default settings??
>
>
> //Henrik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination
> of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you
> are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and delete this message.
> Thank you

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Linux i/o schedulers and TSM

2010-04-26 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
God morning,

Have anyone done performance testing with different i/o schedulers and rhel 5 
and TSM db, log and stgpools, and have a result they would like to share? 
Anyone with opinions regarding i/o schedulers or are we TSM admins happy with 
default settings??


//Henrik









---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Re: disk question

2010-04-21 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Thanks for the answer Rick.

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Richard Rhodes
Sent: den 21 april 2010 20:40
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] disk question

I can tell you my understanding - right or wrong!

Operating systems keep lots of I/O queues . . at least these:
- a queue for each HBA.
- a queue for each LUN.

By spreading your db across multiple luns and hba's, you can get more 
parallelism - assuming your application can make use of the parallelism.
This is why TSM also should have it's database defined using multiple volumes.  
So you get multiple db vols across multiple lun's across multiple HBA's.

Will it help?It all depeneds . . .

The best thing I have ever read about this topic is the following.  It doesn't 
specifically address your question, but it goes into a deep dive about queuing.
http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/06/vmware-io-queues-micro-bursting-and-multipathing.html

Rick






 Henrik Vahlstedt
   To
 Sent by: "ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc
 Manager"
  disk question


 04/21/2010 11:11
 AM


 Please respond to
 "ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager"
 






Hi,

Are there any performance benefits in creating two or more LUN´s in the same 
RAID group for one RHEL 5, TSM 5.5 database, instead of only creating one LUN. 
If yes, why?
Example: IBM Midrange System Storage Implementation and Best Practices Guide 
sg246363, see chapter 7.4/TSM database.

//Henrik


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended 
for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information 
or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message.
Thank you

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


disk question

2010-04-21 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Are there any performance benefits in creating two or more LUN´s in the same 
RAID group for one RHEL 5, TSM 5.5 database, instead of only creating one LUN. 
If yes, why?
Example: IBM Midrange System Storage Implementation and Best Practices Guide 
sg246363, see chapter 7.4/TSM database.

//Henrik


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Re: delete volhist

2010-03-29 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Does that include the last db backup per deviceclass too?

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: den 29 mars 2010 10:51
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] delete volhist


 > You can never delete that volume from Volhist until you have done a new full 
 > successful backup.
Well, not officially. You can issue a del volh type=dbb todate=today force=yes 
which deletes all database backup volumes.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Christian Svensson
Sent: zondag 28 maart 2010 11:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SV: delete volhist

TSM will always keep minimum 1 full TSM DB Backup.
You can never delete that volume from Volhist until you have done a new full 
successful backup.

But it is not recommended to only keep 1 full backup, and you can verify that 
you have a DB Backup by run "q volhist"

Best Regards
Christian Svensson

Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson
Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: 
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms


Från: Mehdi Salehi [ezzo...@googlemail.com]
Skickat: den 28 mars 2010 11:44
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: delete volhist

Hi,
- A TSM server has weekly full and daily incremental database backups.
- All volume history information are accidentally deleted by "delete volhist 
type=all todate=today"
- Can TSM admin restore database backups?

Thanks
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
**

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you


Re: TSM macro vs. script

2010-03-25 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Well said and I agree.

-H.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David 
McClelland
Sent: den 25 mars 2010 11:05
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM macro vs. script

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to stifle people asking questions of the 
list.

However, as an etiquette to us all, I think there's an expected amount of 
research that one should do before posting, e.g. search the list archives to 
check if the question has been asked/answered before; take a look on IBM.com; 
look in the TSM Information Centre; check the product's own extensive and easy 
to access help. If there's still confusion or clarification required, then by 
all means post away.

I think that helps to make the list a happier and more productive resource and 
community for everyone.

/David Mc
London, UK

-Original Message-
From: David McClelland [mailto:t...@networkc.co.uk]
Sent: 25 March 2010 09:44
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] TSM macro vs. script

I think you'll find this link very useful in general, do feel free to take a 
look and have a quick search here before posting questions to the list:

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp

For example, here is information on Scripts and Macros:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/topic/com.ibm.itsmaix
n.doc/anragd55570.htm#srvmac and
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/topic/com.ibm.itsmaix
n.doc/anragd55574.htm#scrmac

Rgds,

/David Mc
London, UK

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi 
Salehi
Sent: 25 March 2010 09:36
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM macro vs. script

Hi,
What is the difference between TSM macros and scripts:

Thanks

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: TSM macro vs. script

2010-03-25 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
What is the difference between using help functions/manuals or asking questions?

tsm: >h macro
3.34 MACRO (Invoke a macro)

Use this command to invoke a file from the administrative command line
that contains one or more Tivoli Storage Manager administrative commands
to be performed


tsm: >h def scr
3.14.33 DEFINE SCRIPT (Define a Tivoli Storage Manager script)

Use this command to define a Tivoli Storage Manager script or to create
a new Tivoli Storage Manager script using the contents from another
script


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi 
Salehi
Sent: den 25 mars 2010 10:36
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM macro vs. script

Hi,
What is the difference between TSM macros and scripts:

Thanks

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Linux - number of drives/daily backup size

2010-01-28 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

You are correct and I am aware of I can calculate a theoretical maximum. But in 
my world there is no definitely 
equal sign between theory and practice. Hence the question about your 
experience.

Thanks
Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: den 29 januari 2010 07:41
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Linux - number of drives/daily backup size

On 28 jan 2010, at 21:47, Henrik Vahlstedt wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Based on your experience. 
> What is maximum number of drives, LTO4 or J3/T10KB, and still having an 
> excellent performance when everything is used at the same time in a Linux 
> server?
> 

calculate the bandwidth of your PCI bus/slot in Gb/s
- you can only have one 4 Gb/s HBA working at 100% capacity on a PCI-X 
133 bus
- 10 Gb/s ethernet requires PCI-X 266 or a suitable PCIe slot
calculate the bandwidth requirements of your drive
- you can have maybe 2 or 3 high-speed drives per HBA



> Size of daily backups?
> Server model?
> Drive type?
> 
> Assumptions are larger models of HP or IBM servers on Intel/AMD, with SAN 
> storage and 10 GigE.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Henrik
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you.

-- 

Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

Remco Post


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Linux - number of drives/daily backup size

2010-01-28 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Based on your experience. 
What is maximum number of drives, LTO4 or J3/T10KB, and still having an 
excellent performance when everything is used at the same time in a Linux 
server?

Size of daily backups?
Server model?
Drive type?

Assumptions are larger models of HP or IBM servers on Intel/AMD, with SAN 
storage and 10 GigE.


Thanks
Henrik



---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: TSM 5.5 to 6.1 migration

2009-07-29 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
For further information see 
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp. 
Look for installation and upgrade guides.

-H.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi 
Salehi
Sent: den 29 juli 2009 12:56
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 to 6.1 migration

Hi,
How costly is TSM 5.5 to 6.1 migration? Does it need export/import?

Thanks,
Mehdi


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Antwort: RE: [ADSM-L] two tsm server instances on the same windows server with library-sharing

2009-07-28 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hello,

After you install TSM server you will get a Management Console where you can 
install and configure your n+ instances.
c$\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Tivoli Storage 
Manager\Management Console.lnk"

No, you can still share the lib. and drives. Same procedure for IBM3584, SL500, 
STK9710 etc.

I assume you use LTO drives, see v.6201 install_README.txt
install_exclusive.exe:
install_exclusive.exe should be used by applications (such as Tivoli 
Storage Manager)
requiring the driver to issue automatic reserves on open and also 
preventing multiple
open handles from a host to a drive to exist at the same time.
Note: This option replaces the previous default installation of 
install.exe

install_nonexclusive.exe:
install_nonexclusive.exe should be used by applications (such as 
Microsoft Data
Protection Manager or Microsoft Removable Storage Manager) permitting 
multiple open 
handles from a host to a drive to exist at the same time.

install_exclusive.exe has nothing to do with TSM library sharing.

Thanks
Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of TSM
Sent: den 29 juli 2009 06:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Antwort: RE: [ADSM-L] two tsm server instances on the same 
windows server with library-sharing

Hello Henrik,

thank you for the responce.
I can't try it now.
I am thinking, whether I can share the same tape-drives on the same windows 
system.

I found the sentences (
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsmfdt.doc/b_install_guide_windows24.htm
) :
"A typical Tivoli Storage Manager installation involves one server instance in 
the Tivoli Storage Manager server machine. You might want to install a second 
instance. You might also want to run more than one server on a large machine if 
you have multiple tape libraries or a disk-only configuration."

For the IBM Tape drive I use "install_exclusive.exe". Does it mean "No drive 
sharing" ?
You use a STK Library. Is this different from IBM libraries for library- and 
drive-sharing with windows ?

With best regards
Andreas.




"Henrik Vahlstedt" 
27.07.2009 09:31

An: "TSM" 
Kopie:
Thema:  RE: [ADSM-L] two tsm server instances on the same windows 
server with library-sharing


Hi,

Yes it is possible. Use the TSM concole wizard to create a second instance and 
follow the steps below. Modify them to fit your settings.



//Henrik



To share a STK9710 library between two TSM instances on the same TSM
server:
Manager:
UPDate LIBRary STK9710 SHAREd=Yes
Set CROSSDefine ON
Set SERVERPAssword 
Set SERVERLladdress 1500
upd dr stk9710 MTxx onl=n

Client:
Set SERVERPAssword 
DEFine SERver Manager SERVERPAssword= HLAddress=127.0.0.1 
LLAddress=1500 CROSSDEFine=Yes PING SERVER X PING SERVER Y DEFine LIBRary 
STK9710 LIBType=SHAREd PRIMarylibmanager=Manager UPDate DEVclass DLT7000 
LIBRary=STK9710

Manager:
CHECKIn LIBVolume STK9710 SEARCH=Bulk STATus=PRIvate CHECKLabel=Barcode
(OWNer=Client)
DEFine PATH Client MTxx SRCType=SERVer DESTType=DRive LIBRary=STK9710 
DEVIce=MTxx (Paths to all drives).

Client:
Audit libr stk9710 checklabel=barcode

Update drives and test tape mounts:
upd dr stk9710 MTxx onl=y
Test backup/restores and tape mounts on both TSM systems.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of TSM
Sent: den 24 juli 2009 18:47
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] two tsm server instances on the same windows server with 
library-sharing

hello,

is it possible, to run two tsm server instances on the same windows system 
using the same library?
Are there any special hints for configure the tsm server and the library 
sharing?

tsm server version 5.5.3.0

with best regards
andreas


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended 
for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information 
or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message.
Thank you.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Errno = 23, 1167 and stuck tapes

2009-07-22 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Thanks for the replies.

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Len 
Boyle
Sent: den 21 juli 2009 21:36
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Errno = 23, 1167 and stuck tapes

Henrik, when we first installed lto-4 tape drives, we had a few problems with 
them. The IBM ce downloaded a dump of data from the tape drive and send that on 
to the higher level support folks. They asked to update the firmware, which was 
just release. This help us greatly. 

Our tape drives are installed in an IBM  3584 (aka TS3500) so the tape drive 
dump can be gathered either via the CE's laptop tools or via the IBM library 
web interface. 

If you are using IBM's drivers, you should be able to download the drive dump 
via a utility supplied with the driver code. In our case this was not an option 
as the tape drives were attached to an netapp box.

len

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Richard Sims
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 1:50 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Errno = 23, 1167 and stuck tapes

Henrik -

I don't have a direct answer for you; but my suspicion is that drive microcode 
is involved, perhaps in conjunction with cartridge vs. drive characteristics.  
The IBM readme document S1003097 for LTO4 shows a very large number of problems 
that have had to be corrected, suggestive of more, ongoing.  The stuck tape 
situation may suggest a problem managing the mechanics and/or timing of drive 
operations.
Given the mechanical malfunction which results, I'd have your CE attend to the 
next event, to examine the conditions logged in the drive's memory, to try to 
uncover the cause.  The inability of an OS command to effect tape dismount 
indicates a serious problem.  If the CE can't be gotten in time during the next 
event, see if you can have the operator get at the drive to record any error 
codes on its panel.
Make sure the CE pores over the sense bytes you're getting from the drive.

Richard Sims


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


FW: Errno = 23, 1167 and stuck tapes

2009-07-21 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hello,

Have anyone experience with Errno = 23, 1167 and stuck tapes or a suggestion 
what might cause the errors and how to solve them?
I get the errors in all kind of datamovement processes, D2T, T2T. Errors are on 
all drives randomly but not all the time.
That is, I can have 1 or 30 mounts before I get an error on a drive and the 
faulty tape mounts OK in another drive.
OS-, switch- and TSM logs etc does not provide any helpfull information.


W2k3 x64 sp2, TSM 5.5.2.1
5 LTO-4, SL500, 3 dual channel HBA´s connected to the SAN with one device per 
channel.
Lastest firmware drivers etc


First, err=1167, space reclamation mounts a tape and the drive disappear, why? 
However after some minutes TSM resurrect the drive and
continue to use it in new processes.
07/20/2009 05:53:21  ANR8337I LTO volume 4R0245 mounted in drive MT504
  (mt0.0.0.2). (PROCESS: 59)
07/20/2009 05:53:42  ANR8311E An I/O error occurred while accessing drive 
MT504
  (mt0.0.0.2) for WEOF operation, errno = 1167. 
(PROCESS:
  59)
07/20/2009 05:53:42  ANR8311E An I/O error occurred while accessing drive 
MT504
  (mt0.0.0.2) for OFFL operation, errno = 1167. 
(PROCESS:
  59)
07/20/2009 05:53:43  ANR8469E Dismount of LTO volume 4R0245 from drive MT504


C:\>net helpmsg 1167
The device is not connected.


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   PlugPlayManager
Event Category: None
Event ID:   12
Date:   7/20/2009
Time:   5:53:42 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:
Description:
The device 'IBM ULTRIUM-TD4 SCSI Sequential Device' 
(SCSI\Sequential&Ven_IBM&Prod_ULTRIUM-TD4&Rev_82F0\5&3652500d&0&00) 
disappeared from the system without first being prepared for removal.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at 
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Data:
: 00 00 00 00   


   Volume Name: 4R0051
 Storage Pool Name: LTO4-BCK
 Device Class Name: LTO4
Estimated Capacity: 1.6 T
   Scaled Capacity Applied:
  Pct Util: 2.0
 Volume Status: Filling
Access: Read-Only
Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.1
   Scratch Volume?: Yes
   In Error State?: No
  Number of Writable Sides: 1
   Number of Times Mounted: 8
 Write Pass Number: 1
 Approx. Date Last Written: 07/20/2009 04:00:47
Approx. Date Last Read: 07/20/2009 21:26:28
   Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
 Number of Read Errors: 0
   Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
 Last Update Date/Time: 07/20/2009 05:52:36
  Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
  Drive Encryption Key Manager: None



Second, err=23, a write errors generates error=23 and the tape is stuck. TSM 
nor Lbtest can remove the tape.
07/21/2009 02:23:29  ANR8337I LTO volume 4R0254 mounted in drive MT501
  (mt0.0.0.5). (SESSION: 12497, PROCESS: 70)
07/21/2009 02:23:29  ANR1340I Scratch volume 4R0254 is now defined in 
storage
  pool LTO4-BCK. (SESSION: 12497, PROCESS: 70)
07/21/2009 02:23:33  ANR0513I Process 70 opened output volume 4R0254. 
(SESSION:
  12497, PROCESS: 70)
07/21/2009 02:24:16  ANR8944E Hardware or media error on drive MT501
  (mt0.0.0.5) with volume 4R0254(OP=WRITE, Error Number=
  23, CC=0, KEY=03, ASC=52, ASCQ=00,
  
SENSE=71.00.03.00.00.00.00.58.00.00.00.00.52.00.36.00.78-
  .D1.23.5D, Description=An undetermined error has
  occurred). Refer to Appendix C in the 'Messages' 
manual
  for recommended action. (SESSION: 12497, PROCESS: 70)
07/21/2009 02:24:16  ANR8359E Media fault detected on LTO volume 4R0254 in
  drive MT501 (mt0.0.0.5) of library SL500. (SESSION:
  12497, PROCESS: 70)
07/21/2009 02:24:16  ANR1411W Access mode for volume 4R0254 now set to
  "read-only" due to write error. (SESSION: 12497, 
PROCESS:
  70)
07/21/2009 02:24:16  ANR0515I Process 70 closed volume 4R0254. (SESSION: 
12497,
  PROCESS: 70)
07/21/2009 02:24:37  ANR8944E Hardware or media error on drive MT501
  (mt0.0.0.5) with volume 4R0254(OP=OFFL, Error Number= 
23,
  CC=0, KEY=03, ASC=53, ASCQ=04,
  
SENSE=70.00.03.00.00.00.00.58.00.00.00.00.53.04.36.00.2E-
  .05.10.06, Description=An undetermined error has
  occurred). Refer to Appendix C in the 'Messages' 
manual
  

Re: Maximum limit of a filename

2009-07-17 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi Christian, 

Read IBM Tivoli Storage Manager V6.1 Linux Backup-Archive Client Known Problems 
and Limitations

"Path names longer than 1024 bytes 
Although Linux system supports files and directories with path plus file name 
length up to 4096 bytes, the TSM Client currently limits the length of filename 
and pathname: maximum filename to 256 and maximum pathname to 1023 bytes 
correspondingly, and an error message is displayed on the console when this 
length exceeds that limit. This will be fixed in a future release."

Note that one byte isnt one characters with unicode...


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Christian Svensson
Sent: den 17 juli 2009 11:42
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Maximum limit of a filename

Hi all,
Has anyone any ideas what the maximum limit of characters is per filename that 
TSM BA Client 5.5.x and 6.1.x can backup in Linux (x86)?
I think I heard a number of 1024 characters but that is not enough in my case. 
:(

Best Regards
Christian Svensson

Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Backing up running VM's

2009-06-17 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hum..

DPM supports site replication so offsite copies should not be a problem. I 
think even Windows guys can read a manual.
We are using TSM and VCB to backup ~800 WM´s. I don't really see why I should 
need Storserver Agent for VCB? 

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Schaub, Steve
Sent: den 17 juni 2009 15:38
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backing up running VM's

Eric,

1. cant help with licensing, IBM is horrible in this area 2. ask your windows 
guys who implemented Microsoft's DPM what their strategy is for DR - chances 
are you'll get a blank look since they haven't thought about how to make 
offsite copies.
3. check out Storserver Agent for VCB, we use their product with great success 
in the vm world.  Using a proxy not only offloads from the vm host, it also 
means you don't need to load/update the tsm client on the vm's.

Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer, Windows
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Backing up running VM's

Hi TSM-ers!
Our windows department is looking at different backup products for backing up 
their server.
They have two major problems with TSM. One I cannot solve: the TSM client 
license is processor based, so quite expensive for the majority of small 
servers. I think we all agree that the TSM client license should be capacity 
based, but IBM aint listening here...
The other problem is that they state TSM cannot backup running VM's.
They now use a product called DPM to make snapshot copies of running VM's.
I'm not really familiar with Window server management, especially when it comes 
to virtualization, but I know one thing: TSM is one of the leading, cutting 
edge backup products, so I doubt TSM is not supporting this feature.
Does anybody know whether it is possible to make snapshot backups with TSM of 
running VM's?
Thank you very much in advance for any reply!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
**

-
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: TSM server recovery

2009-06-16 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
I would install a server with the same OS as the old server, I would not
care much about the OS version.
Install 5.2.0.0 and test db restores tape by tape, which will take some
time...

A couple of weeks ago the list discussed utilities to read TSM tapes,
maybe a bad or good choice.. Search the list archives.


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Wojciech Zukowski
Sent: den 16 juni 2009 11:08
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM server recovery

Hi,
I've got some old tapes, from non-existing TSM server.
The server was decommisioned 5 years ago.
I don't know the hardware.
Library was LTO SCSI with two drives.
TSM server and client were 5.2.0.0.
I don't know if there is a database on tape, there is no devconfig and
volhistory.
Is it possible to recover the server and restore data?

--
Wojciech Zukowski
Gdansk, PL


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: dsmserv initialization error

2009-06-10 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Regarding the dsmserv.dsk question. Yes.


-H.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mario 
Behring
Sent: den 9 juni 2009 17:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] dsmserv initialization error

Hi all,

I´ve noticed that all file systems used to store TSM Databases and Recovery LOG 
files are fullcould that be the problem?


/dev/md0   6297144   5514928782216  88% /
/dev/sda154416 10011 41596  20% /boot
/dev/systemvg/optlv   10485436   8945844   1539592  86% /opt
/dev/systemvg/varlv   14470720   7460472   7010248  52% /var
/dev/tsmvg/tsmlv  1744  11070660 41084 100% /tsm
/dev/tsmvg/archpoollv
  33549632  33490464 59168 100% /tsm_archpool
/dev/tsmvg/fspoollv   33549632  33488412 61220 100% /tsm_fspool
/dev/tsmvg/log1lv 67104064  66258984845080  99% /tsm_log1
/dev/tsmvg/log2lv141266240  69332172  71934068  50% /tsm_log2
/dev/tsmvg2/log3lv36112384  18449988  17662396  52% /tsm_log3
shmfs  2067224 0   2067224   0% /dev/shm


Also, can I recreate the DB and RecLog references inside dsmserv.dsk using an 
editor (vi) and try to start TSM?? Should that work?

Thanks

Mario









From: Henrik Vahlstedt 
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2009 7:32:12 AM
Subject: Re: dsmserv initialization error

In earier versions you could create a new dsmserv.dsk and add a path/name to 
one known log- or dbvolume.
This will allow you to start TSM server and recreates dsmserv.dsk with all 
values.


//Henrik




-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Wolfgang Moeller
Sent: den 9 juni 2009 12:23
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] dsmserv initialization error

Mario Behring writes:
>[...]
> I am getting the following error when trying to start dsmserv on a
Linux box:
>
> Tivoli Storage Manager for Linux/i386
> Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0
>[]
> The /opt/tivoli/tsm/server directory shows 2 dsmserv.dsk files:
>
> -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Jun  1 11:09 dsmserv.dsk
> -rw-r--r--1 root root  970 Oct  4  2008
dsmserv.dsk.200810052302
>[...]

Try to restore "dsmserv.dsk" from your latest Backup.

The TSM server apparently re-writes this file on each startup, however the 
contents normally does not change.

Regards,

Wolfgang J. Moeller at GWDG.DE


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended 
for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information 
or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message.
Thank you.






---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: ANS9999E - Network Backup

2009-06-09 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
How do you mount and run the backup? Error 997 is typical for an
application if it tries to access a (cluster) resource, before the
resource is fully initialized.
Anyway, upgrade your client to 5.5.2.x since y.z.0.0 versions always
have been unreliable.

//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Yudi Darmadi
Sent: den 9 juni 2009 12:52
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANSE - Network Backup

Dear TSM'ers,

I got this error message from a Windows 2008 Client, with TSM 5.5.0.0. I
back up a mounting drive from another machine to this server. Can anyone
help me ? I've already add "MEMORYEFFICIENT yes" in dsm.opt.

ANSE ntrc.cpp(934): Received Win32 RC 997 (0x03e5) from
IsMSDfsRoot(): NetShareGetInfo. Error desription: Overlapped I/O
operation is in progress.
06/09/2009 17:47:54 IsMSDfsRoot(): Server=blsrv, Share=sys,
NetShareGetInfo() returns RC=2141.

Thanks for your help.

Best Regards,


Yudi Darmadi


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: dsmserv initialization error

2009-06-09 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
In earier versions you could create a new dsmserv.dsk and add a
path/name to one known log- or dbvolume.
This will allow you to start TSM server and recreates dsmserv.dsk with
all values.


//Henrik


 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Wolfgang Moeller
Sent: den 9 juni 2009 12:23
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] dsmserv initialization error

Mario Behring writes:
>[...]
> I am getting the following error when trying to start dsmserv on a
Linux box:
>
> Tivoli Storage Manager for Linux/i386
> Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0
>[...]
> The /opt/tivoli/tsm/server directory shows 2 dsmserv.dsk files:
>
> -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Jun  1 11:09 dsmserv.dsk
> -rw-r--r--1 root root  970 Oct  4  2008
dsmserv.dsk.200810052302
>[...]

Try to restore "dsmserv.dsk" from your latest Backup.

The TSM server apparently re-writes this file on each startup, however
the contents normally does not change.

Regards,

Wolfgang J. Moeller at GWDG.DE


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

2009-05-27 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
So If i understand you correctly.
Barcode reader and gripper works perfectly on all slots exept one. 
Tapeutil can read the volumelabel in the faulty slot.

Can the library read the label if the tape is stored and checked in from
a mailslot?
And you sure that 3583 volume inventory is up to date, and is matching
TSM library volume inventory?


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Stephan Boldt
Sent: 27. mai 2009 16:13
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

Hello Henrik,

I cannot see how this should solve the problem. If the library can't
read the tape's barcode (or can't store it in its database, whatever the
reason is), an 'audit library' command would tell TSM that the slot's
empty and tsm would not checkin the volume. But it would try to move
another volume into this slot, when checking them in from the
mailslot...

Maybe I just didn't get the point of your idea...

kind regards,
Stephan

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Henrik Vahlstedt
wrote:

> Run an 'audit library "3583" checkl=barcode' to update library 
> inventory in TSM and a 'checkin libv "3853" search=yes checkl=barcode
stat=pri'.
>
> Let us know if the problem presists after the two commands have run 
> successful.
>
> Thanks
> Henrik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Stephan Boldt
> Sent: 27. mai 2009 09:47
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port
>
> Hello,
>
> our IBM 3583 library seems to have a problem using a certain port.
> Sometimes we get a "slot obstructed" error message because the library

> tries to put a tape into a slot which is already filled with another 
> tape. Looking into the librarys slot information reveals that it 
> assumes this slot is empty! First I thought the cause would be the 
> tape itself / its barcode. But after removing this tape from the lib, 
> the "slot obstructed" problem still occurres with the same slot but a 
> different tape.
> Whatever the cause is, is there a way to tell TSM _not_ to use this 
> slot, even if its empty? Is my assumption right that TSM and not the 
> lib decides where to put a tape when checking it in or removing it 
> from a tapedrive? But when does TSM get the information about which 
> slots are present in a library? During an "audit library"?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stephan
>
>
> ---
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is 
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination 
> of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you 
> are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return 
> e-mail and delete this message.
> Thank you.
>


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

2009-05-27 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Yes it was, but not in the orginal post.
"our IBM 3583 library seems to have a problem using a certain port."

-H. 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: 27. mai 2009 12:03
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

3584 was mentioned

Grigori G. Solonovitch

Senior Technical Architect

Information Technology  Bank of Kuwait and Middle East
http://www.bkme.com

Phone: (+965) 2231-2274  Mobile: (+965) 99798073  E-Mail:
g.solonovi...@bkme.com

Please consider the environment before printing this Email


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Henrik Vahlstedt
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:54 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

"volume sensor in slot is damaged"

What is a "volume sensor in slot" in a 3583?

-H.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: 27. mai 2009 11:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

Maybe this is simple hardware problem - volume sensor in slot is
damaged?

Grigori G. Solonovitch

Senior Technical Architect

Information Technology  Bank of Kuwait and Middle East
http://www.bkme.com

Phone: (+965) 2231-2274  Mobile: (+965) 99798073  E-Mail:
g.solonovi...@bkme.com

Please consider the environment before printing this Email

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Michael Green
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:42 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

I did. More than once.
IBM 3584 here.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green



On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Davis, Adrian
 wrote:
>
>
> Just a thought: Has somebody been loading tapes into the library not 
> using TSM checkin? (Maybe using the library front panel controls or 
> tapeutil).

Please consider the environment before printing this Email.

"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are
not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the
sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this
communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this
email or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception
or unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and
comments of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily
endorsed by BKME."


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.

"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are
not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the
sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this
communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this
email or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception
or unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and
comments of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily
endorsed by BKME."


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

2009-05-27 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
"volume sensor in slot is damaged"

What is a "volume sensor in slot" in a 3583?

-H.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: 27. mai 2009 11:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

Maybe this is simple hardware problem - volume sensor in slot is
damaged?

Grigori G. Solonovitch

Senior Technical Architect

Information Technology  Bank of Kuwait and Middle East
http://www.bkme.com

Phone: (+965) 2231-2274  Mobile: (+965) 99798073  E-Mail:
g.solonovi...@bkme.com

Please consider the environment before printing this Email

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Michael Green
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:42 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

I did. More than once.
IBM 3584 here.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green



On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Davis, Adrian
 wrote:
>
>
> Just a thought: Has somebody been loading tapes into the library not 
> using TSM checkin? (Maybe using the library front panel controls or 
> tapeutil).

Please consider the environment before printing this Email.

"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are
not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the
sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this
communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this
email or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception
or unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and
comments of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily
endorsed by BKME."


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

2009-05-27 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Run an 'audit library "3583" checkl=barcode' to update library inventory
in TSM and a 'checkin libv "3853" search=yes checkl=barcode stat=pri'.

Let us know if the problem presists after the two commands have run
successful.

Thanks
Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Stephan Boldt
Sent: 27. mai 2009 09:47
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Preventing TSM from using a certain library port

Hello,

our IBM 3583 library seems to have a problem using a certain port.
Sometimes we get a "slot obstructed" error message because the library
tries to put a tape into a slot which is already filled with another
tape. Looking into the librarys slot information reveals that it assumes
this slot is empty! First I thought the cause would be the tape itself /
its barcode. But after removing this tape from the lib, the "slot
obstructed" problem still occurres with the same slot but a different
tape.
Whatever the cause is, is there a way to tell TSM _not_ to use this
slot, even if its empty? Is my assumption right that TSM and not the lib
decides where to put a tape when checking it in or removing it from a
tapedrive? But when does TSM get the information about which slots are
present in a library? During an "audit library"?

Thanks in advance,
Stephan


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: IBM Tape Device Driver - Windows Server 2008

2009-04-28 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Is Removable storage service disabled?

//Henrik 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Collyer
Sent: den 28 april 2009 15:03
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] IBM Tape Device Driver - Windows Server 2008

I've installed the IBM Tape Device Driver v6.2.0.1 onto a Windows 2008
x64 Server.  The install is always successful and installs on all medium
changers and tape drives.

On some devices, when I reboot the server the driver doesn't stay
associated to the tape or medium changer device.  This appears to be
adhoc and changes after every reboot.

Has anyone else seen this behaviour or got any suggestions please?

I've not configured persistent bindings this time since the TSM docs
state that SAN Discovery is the way forward and there is no need for
them.  Is this perhaps the issue here?

Thanks.

Andy

-
Find out about our efforts to create gardens in Yorkshire's primary
schools using a million green fingers by following this link:
http://greenfingers.yorkshirewater.com/

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also be legally
privileged. The contents are intended for recipient only and are subject
to the legal notice available at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm
Yorkshire Water Services Limited Registered Office Western House Halifax
Road Bradford BD6 2SZ Registered in England and Wales No 2366682


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Delete a storagepool

2009-04-27 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

The benefit from running delete volume from a script outside TSM, where the 
script starts a new session per volume you delete. Is that you avoid the 
infamous dead lock you will get when you rapidly delete or create volumes in 
TSM.


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: den 27 april 2009 11:43
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Delete a storagepool

Hi Christian!
I'm currently deleting the volumes through a macro file. It will probably run 
for several hours (400+ tapes) but it seems to be the only way.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Christian Svensson
Sent: maandag 27 april 2009 9:07
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SV: Delete a storagepool

Hi Eric,
You can always write a script that you run. That how I did it for a customer 
here in Sweden.
I couldn't find the script on my laptop anymore. But it is really easy to write 
a batch script or just Copy and Paste script.

Best Regards
Christian Svensson

Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson

Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] för Loon, EJ van - 
SPLXM [eric-van.l...@klm.com]
Skickat: den 24 april 2009 15:23
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: Delete a storagepool

Hi *SM-ers!
I have to delete an old library, containing a copypool.
I can delete all volumes one-by-one but I wonder, is there a quicker/easier way 
to delete a complete copypool?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
**
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
**


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Delete a storagepool

2009-04-24 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Short answer, no. 

//Henrik



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: den 24 april 2009 15:23
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Delete a storagepool

Hi *SM-ers!
I have to delete an old library, containing a copypool.
I can delete all volumes one-by-one but I wonder, is there a
quicker/easier way to delete a complete copypool?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail
or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any
other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly
prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by
error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or
its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete
transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any
delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
number 33014286
**


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: export to another platform

2009-03-12 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Yes it is possible the the only way to migrate from one TSM server
platform to another.
You export your server on server1 and 'import server' on server2.

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Mehdi Salehi
Sent: den 12 mars 2009 11:01
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] export to another platform

hi,
Is it possible to export from one server into another platform?
for example:
export server filedata=all toserver=server2

while source is windows and server2 is AIX?

Thanks so much


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: SV: multiple schedules on one server

2009-03-10 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
"dsmadmc is the one that used to not allow any other command line options but 
userid and password"

Are you sure that TSM started to use TcpServer and TcpPort options in 5.2?? 
(-tcps=,-tcpp=)


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Howard 
Coles
Sent: den 10 mars 2009 16:01
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: multiple schedules on one server

Yea, I did some testing with that yesterday.  I'm so used to the older versions 
of the Admin session commandline's limitations that I forgot about that part.  
Sorry.

The dsmadmc is the one that used to not allow any other command line options 
but userid and password.  I used it so much in the 5.2 days I never went back 
and checked.  DOH!  

I stand corrected.

See Ya'
Howard

> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Christian Svensson
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:53 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: multiple schedules on one server
> 
> Hi,
> Howard, you can use -optfile=C:\location\dsm.opt in Windows but you 
> can't use -servername=Instance_name in Windows.
> 
> Joe, what you can do to make sure your users can't access other 
> peoples data is by change the security on DSM.OPT, and put dsm.opt in 
> their directory with ReadOnly access.
> Now should you be able to run dsm.exe 
> -optfile=D:\Users\Company\dsm.opt and also have put your security to a higher 
> level.
> 
> Best Regards
> Christian Svensson
> 
> Cell: +46-70-325 1577
> E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
> Skype: cristie.christian.svensson
> 
> Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] för Howard 
> Coles [howard.co...@ardenthealth.com]
> Skickat: den 9 mars 2009 20:23
> Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Ämne: Re: multiple schedules on one server
> 
> No, that won't work on a Windows Client.
> 
> You have to do the following in a batch file:
> 
> Set dsm_config=c:\location\of\dsm.opt
> dsm
> 
> The reason being, the Windows client doesn't take the same arguments 
> as the *NIX clients.
> 
> See Ya'
> Howard
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On 
> > Behalf Of Joe Crnjanski
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:55 PM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] multiple schedules on one server
> >
> > Sorry I didn't mentioned; it is Windows client.
> >
> > So I guess I can create batch file backup1.cmd and put one line
> inside:
> >  dsm -optfile=/location/of/dsm1.opt
> >
> > and than another batch file backup2.cmd with content:
> > dsm -optfile=/location/of/dsm2.opt
> >
> > etc,etc  It sounds like it will work. I will try and let you know.
> >
> >
> > Joe Crnjanski
> > Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
> > Phone: 416-235-0931 x226
> > Fax:   416-235-0265
> > Web:www.infinitynetwork.com
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On 
> > Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:39 PM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: Re: multiple schedules on one server
> >
> > You did not say what platform/OS but assume Windoze from your GUI 
> > reference.
> >
> > I have multiple-schedules/instances on Solaris and Netware servers 
> > doing just what you are trying to do.  Each uses different WEBPORTS 
> > and the DSMCAD java-based "GUI" to control
> >
> > Windows is more complicated in setting up multiple scheduler
> services.
> > My
> > windows guy says he doesn't use the GUI on a multi-instance server, 
> > unless he manually changes the dsm.opt file since he doesn't use the 
> > java/dsmcad piece.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Joe Crnjanski  Sent by: "ADSM: Dist 
> > Stor Manager" 
> > 03/09/2009 02:13 PM
> > Please respond to
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
> >
> >
> > To
> > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > [ADSM-L] multiple schedules on one server
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > We have customer who is hosting multiple clients on his server. He 
> > wants to backup different folders (that belong to different 
> > customers) with different TSM node name, and he also wants his 
> > customers to be able
> to
> > lunch GUI and see only their files.
> >
> >
> >
> > I can install multiple schedules on his server that will use
> different
> > dsm.opt files, but when I lunch GUI it will always use only one 
> > dsm.opt.
> > So I can have different nodes backing up different folders, but I 
> > cannot check it with GUI. I would need some sort of start-up switch 
> > that
> will
> > tell GUI which dsm.opt to use or something like this.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any ideas appreciated,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Joe Crnjanski
> >
> > Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
> >
> > Phone: 416-235-0931 x226
> >
> > Fax:   416-235-0265
> >
> > Web:www.infinitynetwork.com



Re: Preferred TSM Platform

2009-02-25 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Time to quote Kelly...

"So to me it's either AIX or Windows (yes, you can do a lot of TSM on
Windows once you get past the bigotry!).  Choose whichever one you have
the most experience with."


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: den 25 februari 2009 15:11
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform

I would stick with AIX as the #1 Choice just because the combo of
hardware and OS are unbeatable for this kind of thing.  I've seen
Windows Servers Choke on half the amounts of data I move every day, and
I have yet to even use more than 1% of my proc, or use the swap space on
my AIX box.
Second from that would be Linux (because I don't know Solaris).

I would avoid Windows.

See Ya'
Howard


> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Ian Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:31 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform
> 
> Hi
> 
> 
> 
> I am sure this question has been asked many times, however with server

> and OS development what is the favored OS for TSM v5? I have always 
> preferred AIX however never been keen on Solaris and am considering 
> Windows instead.
> 
> 
> 
> Will v6 be compatible with the Windows platform?
> 
> 
> 
> Ian Smith
> 
> 
> 
> Dell Corporation Limited is registered in England and Wales. Company 
> Registration Number: 2081369 Registered address: Dell House, The 
> Boulevard, Cain Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 1LF, UK.
> Company details for other Dell UK entities can be found on 
> www.dell.co.uk.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Windows 2008 HYPERV Backup With TSM

2009-01-20 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Post´s answer basiclly said TSM supports Windows 2008 under the assumption the 
agent is installed on every 
virtual server. You might like the approach above but I would prefer a more 
centralized way to do 
backups of virtual servers, ex. like Vmware Consolidated Backup. 
Since Post knows alot of organizations running TSM & W2k8, he might be able to 
share his thoughts on a backup strategy for HyperV?

Thanks
Henrik




-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of ? 
?
Sent: den 19 januari 2009 14:49
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows 2008 HYPERV Backup With TSM

I guess an agent on each virtual machine will work as on a physical machine.

I've meant on the Host machine - to backup each VM as a file (kind of an image).

Gideon Brown
System Administrator
03-5319085,052-8395641
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Henrik 
Vahlstedt
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:24 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows 2008 HYPERV Backup With TSM

That is, TSM client is installed on every virtual machine..? Or in a 
centralized way like VCB framework??

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: den 19 januari 2009 14:20
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows 2008 HYPERV Backup With TSM

On 19 jan 2009, at 14:11, גדעון בראון wrote:

> Hello All!
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if TSM has an agent that can back up Windows 2008 
> Virtual Machines (HYPERV)?
>

Hi,

I've heard of no problems with TSM, and I do know that it is used by a number 
of organizations.

>

--

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 24821 622


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended 
for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information 
or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message.
Thank you.

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that 
is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us 
immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately 
if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Windows 2008 HYPERV Backup With TSM

2009-01-19 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
That is, TSM client is installed on every virtual machine..? Or in a 
centralized way like VCB framework??

//Henrik 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: den 19 januari 2009 14:20
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows 2008 HYPERV Backup With TSM

On 19 jan 2009, at 14:11, גדעון בראון wrote:

> Hello All!
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if TSM has an agent that can back up Windows 2008 
> Virtual Machines (HYPERV)?
>

Hi,

I've heard of no problems with TSM, and I do know that it is used by a  
number of organizations.

>

-- 

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 24821 622


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: TSM server from x32 to x64 version

2008-12-10 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi Bo,

I would first move to new hardware and run TSM for a couple of days,
then upgrade TSM.

I think it is easier to troubleshot possible problems if you split the
migration and upgrade.


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nielsen, Bo
Sent: den 10 december 2008 11:38
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM server from x32 to x64 version

Hi *SMs

The existing enviroment is TSM 5.4.1.2 on W2K3 SP1 x32.

Now I upgrade TSM to 5.5.1 and after this move to new hardware W2K8 x64,
what is the recommended way to do this.


aOaRegards 
Bo Nielsen 
   * +45 4386 4671 
Coop  IT  * (Internt postcenter): 6244 
Data & Storage Center * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember, a
dead fish can float downstream, But it takes a live one to svim
upstream. - W.C. Fields. 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: How to Restore Data From Other Servers

2008-11-24 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
No, I ment..

On server A: 

Use dsm.exe in command line and type 'dsm.exe -virtualnodename=serverB' 
You have to supply your TSM admin ID and PW.
Then in GUI restore serverB´s data to serverA.


Btw Martin, why would I want to change things already written in dsm.opt


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Norita 
binti Hassan
Sent: den 24 november 2008 10:24
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How to Restore Data From Other Servers

So, that's mean, I have to disconnect any connection to that server first and 
change the node name..
Then I only can 

Norita Hasan
- ICT Div -

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
Panggabean
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 4:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: How to Restore Data From Other Servers

You can also change the nodename in dsm.opt (Windows) or dsm.sys (Unix).
Make sure you have the privillege to do so.

BR,

Martin P


> Use -virtualnodename. Check BA client manual for more information.
>
> //Henrik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Norita binti Hassan
> Sent: den 24 november 2008 08:28
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] How to Restore Data From Other Servers
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Can I do restore from another server instead of the server that we do 
> the backup.
>
>
>
> Eg, Restore Server B data from Server C data 
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> Email scanned and protected by POS Malaysia
>
>
> Pos Malaysia Berhad is Malaysia's national postal company
>
> Visit us online at www.pos.com.my
>
>
>
> NOTICE
>
> This message may contain privileged and/or confidential
>
> information. If you are not the addressee or authorised
>
> to receive this email, you must not use, copy, disclose
>
> or take any action based on this email. If you have
>
> received this email in error, please advise the sender
>
> immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.
>
> Pos Malaysia Berhad takes no responsibility for the
>
> contents of this email.
>
>
> ---
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is 
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination
of
> the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and 
> delete this message.
> Thank you.
>

Email scanned and protected by POS Malaysia

Pos Malaysia Berhad is Malaysia's national postal company
   
Visit us online at www.pos.com.my

NOTICE
This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If
you are  not the addressee  or authorised to  receive this email, you
must not use, copy,  disclose or take any  action based  on this email.
If you  have received this  email in  error, please advise  the sender
immediately by  reply e-mail and delete  this message. Pos Malaysia
Berhad takes  no responsibility  for  the contents of this email.





Email scanned and protected by POS Malaysia


Pos Malaysia Berhad is Malaysia's national postal company 

Visit us online at www.pos.com.my 



NOTICE 

This message may contain privileged and/or confidential 

information. If you are not the addressee or authorised 

to receive this email, you must not use, copy, disclose 

or take any action based on this email. If you have 

received this email in error, please advise the sender 

immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. 

Pos Malaysia Berhad takes no responsibility for the 

contents of this email. 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: How to Restore Data From Other Servers

2008-11-24 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Use -virtualnodename. Check BA client manual for more information.

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Norita binti Hassan
Sent: den 24 november 2008 08:28
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] How to Restore Data From Other Servers

Hi,

 

Can I do restore from another server instead of the server that we do
the backup.

 

Eg, Restore Server B data from Server C data  

 

Thanks

 



Email scanned and protected by POS Malaysia


Pos Malaysia Berhad is Malaysia's national postal company 

Visit us online at www.pos.com.my 



NOTICE 

This message may contain privileged and/or confidential 

information. If you are not the addressee or authorised 

to receive this email, you must not use, copy, disclose 

or take any action based on this email. If you have 

received this email in error, please advise the sender 

immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. 

Pos Malaysia Berhad takes no responsibility for the 

contents of this email. 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: DataDomain problems

2008-11-21 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
I still belive it is an account, premission issue. 

-H.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard van Denzel
Sent: den 21 november 2008 12:49
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain problems

Yes we are running as local Administrator for the server.

We can map the share to a drive letter (we used K:) and we are then able
to create maps/folders and/or files on the share.

Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
 
Richard van Denzel.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Henrik Vahlstedt
Sent: 21 November 2008 11:38
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain problems

We use UNC names when we use Datadomain.

Msg=8971 says "The server attempted to validate that the directory was
accessible"

If TSM server runs under Local System account, doeas Local system have
access rights to the DD share? Test to run define devclass when TSM
server is running undere your admin account.


//Henrik



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard van Denzel
Sent: den 21 november 2008 11:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] DataDomain problems

Hi All,

 

I'm trying to add a DataDomain DD530 (running DDR 4.5.2.5-76716) to a
Windows (2003 SP2) TSM Server (5.5.1.0). I can add a CIFS share from the
DD530 without problems and also create maps/folders and files on it from
Windows.

 

When I issue the following command from TSM:

 

DEF DEVC DD_CLASS DEVT=FILE MAXCAP=200G DIR=K:\DDPool (K: being the
mapped CIFS share)

 

I get the following error:

 

ANR8971E Unable to validate the directory name K:\DDPOOL for DEFINE
DEVCLASS command.

ANR8366E Define Devclass: Invalid value for DIRECTORY parameter.

 

I also tried the UNC path (\\DD530\backup\DDPool
 ) instead, but with the same results.

 

I can use local disks from the TSM Server just fine for the FILE class
(e.g. like C: or D:).

 

Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,

 

Richard van Denzel

 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: DataDomain problems

2008-11-21 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
We use UNC names when we use Datadomain.

Msg=8971 says "The server attempted to validate that the directory was
accessible"

If TSM server runs under Local System account, doeas Local system have
access rights to the DD share? Test to run define devclass when TSM
server is running undere your admin account.


//Henrik



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard van Denzel
Sent: den 21 november 2008 11:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] DataDomain problems

Hi All,

 

I'm trying to add a DataDomain DD530 (running DDR 4.5.2.5-76716) to a
Windows (2003 SP2) TSM Server (5.5.1.0). I can add a CIFS share from the
DD530 without problems and also create maps/folders and files on it from
Windows.

 

When I issue the following command from TSM:

 

DEF DEVC DD_CLASS DEVT=FILE MAXCAP=200G DIR=K:\DDPool (K: being the
mapped CIFS share)

 

I get the following error:

 

ANR8971E Unable to validate the directory name K:\DDPOOL for DEFINE
DEVCLASS command.

ANR8366E Define Devclass: Invalid value for DIRECTORY parameter.

 

I also tried the UNC path (\\DD530\backup\DDPool
 ) instead, but with the same results.

 

I can use local disks from the TSM Server just fine for the FILE class
(e.g. like C: or D:).

 

Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,

 

Richard van Denzel

 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: scheduling backups Monday through thursday

2008-11-12 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Have you tried 'help define schedule'?


tsm: >def sched notes-tdp test1 dayofweek=m,tu,w,th SCHEDStyle=Enhanced
ANR2500I Schedule TEST1 defined in policy domain NOTES-TDP.

tsm: >q sched notes-tdp test1 f=d

Policy Domain Name: NOTES-TDP
 Schedule Name: TEST1
   Description:
Action: Incremental
   Options:
   Objects:
  Priority: 5
   Start Date/Time: 11/12/2008 16:17:10
  Duration: 1 Hour(s)
Schedule Style: Enhanced
Period:
   Day of Week: Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu
 Month: Any
  Day of Month: Any
 Week of Month: Any
Expiration:
Last Update by (administrator): 
 Last Update Date/Time: 11/12/2008 16:17:10
  Managing profile:
 

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lee, Gary D.
Sent: den 12 november 2008 16:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] scheduling backups Monday through thursday

I would like to schedule backups of some of our desktops for Monday
through thursdays.
Dayofweek=weekday will include fridays, and by the time our backup
window starts, most people have left for the weekend and shut down their
machines.
Clients are mostly windows, ranging from 5.2 to 5.5. Server is solaris
2.8 running tsm 5.2.10.

Thanks for any help.


Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Updating spacetrigger db full percentage

2008-10-29 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Use 'update spacetrigger db fullpct=90'. 

-H.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Dudley
Sent: den 29 oktober 2008 06:18
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Updating spacetrigger db full percentage

When I run "q spacetrigger db f=d" I see



DB Full Percentage: 80

 DB Space Expansion Percentage: 100



I have worked out how to change DB Space Expansion Percentage but how
would I change DB Full Percentage from 80 to 90?





Regards

Paul



Paul Dudley

Senior IT Systems Administrator

ANL Container Line Pty Limited

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]












ANL DISCLAIMER

This e-mail and any file attached is confidential, and intended solely
to the named addressees. Any unauthorised dissemination or use is
strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail from your system. Please
do not copy, use or make reference to it for any purpose, or disclose
its contents to any person.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: remove dir without deleting the entire filespace

2008-10-16 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
If you are using a client level that supports it, try delete backup command. 

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pavel 
Sitnikov
Sent: den 16 oktober 2008 13:33
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] remove dir without deleting the entire filespace

Hi,

On the drive D: was executed backup directories A and B. How can I remove only 
one of these directories, with all its contents, without deleting the entire 
filespace \\server\D$?

Thanks...


..
С уважением, Ситников Павел
Дирекция сопровождения серверных систем
ОАО "УРАЛСИБ", Уфа
(347) 251-96-62, (010) 4385


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: DB Mirroring - Poll and question

2008-08-21 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Why not use some old IBM scripts when comparing performance??? 

The scrips was orginally published under "How to determine when disk
tuning is needed for your ITSM server"
at http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21141810. See
discussion at
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg51968.html



"On my first test expire run on my new test server (to which I reloaded
the 194GB production DB), the expire ran in 10-hours - 1/4 of the usual
time."
Reload = Unload + load DB, or only a restore DB?

//Henrik
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, Jim
Sent: den 21 augusti 2008 00:06
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB Mirroring - Poll and question

(using small voice)  I guess it's not "lots."  124,858,663 files, 131 TB
occupancy, 90 GB database, ~100 clients.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Rodolfich
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:33 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB Mirroring - Poll and question

WOW, the 342 Million files is what is killing you but it still seems
like an excessive amount of time. You mentioned Saturday as when it
starts.
You
are running expiration daily aren't you? You should be able to run
expiration and reclamation to completion each day or you need to look at
another instance or configuration to meet your resource needs. If you
don't complete expiration and reclamation daily, you will be queueing up
unfinished work each day that will turn into a 24-48 hour expiration
run(sounds like you are there). Expiration and reclamation go
hand-in-hand.
If your expiration doesn't complete then you reclamation can't either.
As a
result, you may have a good number of un-reclaimed and un-expired
entries in your database. BTW, I have always been told, by my TSM
mentors, that due to the database intensive nature of expiration, that
it should always run by itself.


Define LOTS?

My specs are:

194GB DB
206TB Occupancy
342,194,690 files





"Schneider, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
08/20/2008 01:58 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Mirroring - Poll and question






We need 4-6 hours for 90GB DB, ~100 clients.  The servers have LOTS of
files.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Michael Green
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB Mirroring - Poll and question

48 hours sounds like an awfully looong time to me.
On my busiest Linux server (90gb DB, ~100 clients) expiration completes
in 20-30 minutes.

-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 18:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] DB Mirroring - Poll and question


On my big, 194GB production Linux server, an EXPIRE INVENTORY runs 40-48
hours.  Granted, the server is very busy performing other tasks such as
client backups, stgbackups and such.  The DB buffers and such are
configured identically to the production server.

On my first test expire run on my new test server (to which I reloaded
the 194GB production DB), the expire ran in 10-hours - 1/4 of the usual
time.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Urgent: Trick to delete individual node events no longer works

2008-08-19 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Works fine for me on Windows 5.4.2.0 and AIX 5.4.3.0. Is the trick
really a way to generate reports and are query event a good input for a
reports?
IMO, I do not distort reports and I check Last Backup Completion
Date/Time in query filespace since query event doesn't give me what I
want.


Thanks
Henrik





-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, John
Sent: den 19 augusti 2008 12:36
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Urgent: Trick to delete individual node events no
longer works

Greetings,
Sorry if this has been discussed, but I could not find any traffic
about it.
In ADSM QuickFacts it says:
 
 
Delete Events -
To delete certain events for a
specific
node only, disassociate and then
reassociate that node with the
schedule
that is listed in the event log
entry to
be removed. This will delete,
for that
specific node only, ALL event
entries
associated with that schedule.

We have used this trick to delete individual node events in the past,
but this trick no longer seems to work.  We recently upgraded to TSM
5.4.3.0, and now when you disassociate the node from the schedule the
event goes away, but when you reassociate the node with the schedule,
the event reappears.  Has anybody else seen this?   Any clever trick to
fix it?  We use a script to identify failed backups when there is some
unexpected situation that causes some clients to fail, and runs an
immediate backup on them, and then uses this trick to clear the original
event so it doesn't show up in our reports as a failure.  
 
I don't know if the TSM 5.4.3.0 upgragrade anything to do with it, or is
there some other cause.  But the upgrade is a recent change, anyway.
 

Best Regards,

John D. Schneider
Lead Systems Administrator - Storage
Sisters of Mercy Health Systems
3637 South Geyer Road
St. Louis, MO  63127
Phone: 314-364-3150
Cell: 314-750-8721
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
This e-mail contains information which (a) may be PROPRIETARY IN NATURE
OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only
for the use of the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the
addressee, or the person responsible for delivering this to the
addressee(s), you are notified that reading, copying or distributing
this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please contact the sender immediately.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Updated VS Backed Up

2008-08-13 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
 Ok, as I said I was a little bit tired after an 14 hour shift..

Your question was "Does anyone know how to get a testflag into a client
option set?"

tsm: >def clientopt test TRACEFLAGS "-testflags=DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE"
ANR2050I DEFINE CLIENTOPT: Option TRACEFLAGS defined in optionset TEST.


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shawn Drew
Sent: den 13 augusti 2008 16:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Updated VS Backed Up

Skipntpermissions addresses a different issue.  DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE
addresses permissions that are saved in the TSM DB I believe as opposed
to the ntfs security which stores the metadata in the storagepool.

Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/12/2008 06:29 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Updated VS Backed Up





Hi,

Check 'Skipntpermissions' in the client manual.
There could be a traceclass too but I am too tired to look..

Thanks
Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shawn Drew
Sent: den 13 augusti 2008 00:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Updated VS Backed Up

"testflag DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE"

I read this tsmblog article:
http://tsmblog.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/81-UPDATED-vs-BACKED-
UP.html

I remember reading about this testflag on the IBM Support site  and I
thought I remember reading about it on adsm-l somewhere, but searching
Google or IBM for "DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE" doesn't return anything anymore.

Anyway, for posterity:

By default TSM will not keep a history of permission changes, which
doesn't make sense to me!
In the past I've had to do complete system restores after a virus messed
up permissions.

This testflag in the dsm.opt file will disable that and backup the file
for any change (including permission changes)


Does anyone know how to get a testflag into a client option set?
(My last resort will be to try adding "-testflags=DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE"
to the options of all my schedules)



Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew


This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in
error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not
in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either
whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can
not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its
subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if
modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP
Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Updated VS Backed Up

2008-08-12 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Check 'Skipntpermissions' in the client manual.
There could be a traceclass too but I am too tired to look..

Thanks
Henrik 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shawn Drew
Sent: den 13 augusti 2008 00:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Updated VS Backed Up

"testflag DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE"

I read this tsmblog article:
http://tsmblog.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/81-UPDATED-vs-BACKED-
UP.html

I remember reading about this testflag on the IBM Support site  and I
thought I remember reading about it on adsm-l somewhere, but searching
Google or IBM for "DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE" doesn't return anything anymore.

Anyway, for posterity:

By default TSM will not keep a history of permission changes, which
doesn't make sense to me!
In the past I've had to do complete system restores after a virus messed
up permissions.

This testflag in the dsm.opt file will disable that and backup the file
for any change (including permission changes)


Does anyone know how to get a testflag into a client option set?
(My last resort will be to try adding "-testflags=DISABLEATTRIBUPDATE"
to the options of all my schedules)



Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew


This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in
error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not
in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either
whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can
not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its
subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if
modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP
Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Reclamation Tape Count...

2008-08-08 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
>From Google... 

"Fuji +tape" = http://www.fujifilm.com/products/storage/ltoultrium.html

Browse their website and find the spec. Hint (products/data storage
media/lto..


"Media Durability(Nominal) 
 - 
 1,000,000 passes 
 - 
 
Estimated Archival Life 
 - 
 30 years "


TSM wont track the number of reclaims per given tape but if you checkin
the tape with 'status=private stgpool=', the tape wont go back to
scratch pool and therefore keep the information about "Number of Times
Mounted" from 'q vol'.


//Henrik


 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andy Huebner
Sent: den 8 augusti 2008 15:04
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation Tape Count...

TSM does not keep information on a tape beyond its current use.
Not sure about LTO, but they are similar to 3590 which we run to the
first write error.  In general this takes years, but I have no idea how
many mounts.

Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
M.Kiran Kumar
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 12:54 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Reclamation Tape Count...

Hi,

Please let me know how to check the tape, how many times it is reclaimed
in TSM. And how many times can we use a LTO Gen3 and LTO Gen4 Media??


Regards,
Kiran M







Disclaimer:
This email message (including attachments if any) may contain
privileged, proprietary, confidential information, which may be exempt
from any kind of disclosure whatsoever and is intended solely for the
use of addressee (s). If you are not the intended recipient, kindly
inform us by return e-mail and also kindly disregard the contents of the
e-mail, delete the original message and destroy any copies thereof
immediately. You are notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless approved by
the sender.

DQ Entertainment (DQE) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize
the risk of transmission of computer viruses with this e-mail; DQE is
not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in
this e-mail. DQE shall not be liable for the views expressed in the
e-mail. DQE reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all
messages sent to or from this e-mail address


This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an
authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited
from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or
its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of
this message and any attachments.
Thank you.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Q INCLEXCL and "Operating System"

2008-08-08 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hello, 

Just a guess, have you checked the entries in registry,
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
otToBackup?

//Henrik 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bill Boyer
Sent: den 7 augusti 2008 16:57
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Q INCLEXCL and "Operating System"

Got a strange one. TSM client 5.4.1.2 on Windows2003 running Oracle 11.
The admin used to have an Exclude.DIR for the Oracle archive log
directory and now wants to back it up. He removed the Exclude.DIR and
added an Include to bind to a different management class, but nothing
would back up. The output of Q INCLEXCL is showing  several different
Oracle excludes listed as "Operating System", but there are no matching
entries in the FilesNotToBackup registry key. Here's brief snippet from
the Q INCLEXCL:



Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\11.1.0\DB\DATABASE\SNCFPRB1.ORA
Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\DATA\PRB1\USERS01.DBF Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\DATA\PRB1\UNDOTBS01.DBF Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\DATA\PRB1\SYSAUX01.DBF Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\DATA\PRB1\SYS01.DBF  Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\DATA\PRB1\PRB1_DATA_TS.DBF Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\ADMIN\PRB1\ARCH\PRB1_1_5824_653576027.ARC
Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\ADMIN\PRB1\ARCH\PRB1_1_5823_653576027.ARC
Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\ADMIN\PRB1\ARCH\PRB1_1_5822_653576027.ARC
Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\ADMIN\PRB1\ARCH\PRB1_1_5821_653576027.ARC
Operating System

Exclude All   D:\ORACLE\ADMIN\PRB1\ARCH\PRB1_1_5820_653576027.ARC
Operating System





Where are these coming from?? They are able to ARCHIVE this directory,
but BACKUP the directory.



Bill Boyer


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Rebuilding a volume history file

2008-07-04 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Search archives on Sim´s and Remco´s  extended discussion about volhist a month 
ago or so. 
Backup volhist rewrites the whole volhist.out file. Not an incomplete file..

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Loon, E.J. 
van - SPLXM
Sent: den 4 juli 2008 14:29
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Rebuilding a volume history file

Hi!
I don't understand your reply.
A BAckup VOLHistory just makes a backup of the currently incomplete volume 
history file. How would that help me?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TSM User
Sent: vrijdag 4 juli 2008 13:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Rebuilding a volume history file

BAckup VOLHistory

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Hi *SM-ers!
> The filesystem which contains my volume history file was filled to 
> 100% last night, so TSM reported I/O errors while writing to it. I 
> have had the filesystem enlarged, but now I have a volume history file

> which is missing data.
> Is there a way to rebuild a volume history file?
> Thank you very much for any reply!
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> **
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly

> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
> delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
> any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> **
>
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
**


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: TSM Cluster Scheduler Question

2008-07-01 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi again Farren !

Aha ok, two nodenames?

My best guess is that TSM Cluster Scheduler is only backing up the OS.
And TSM Exchange TDP Scheduler is responsible for Exchange backups.

What I do is to use two TSM nodes and two scheduler services on Exchange
servers like you seem to have.
But I only have TSM Exchange TDP Scheduler defined as a cluster
resource.

OS backup is not a part of the cluster and should be defined per host,
which requires two nodenames.


Thanks
Henrik


 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Minns, Farren - Chichester
Sent: den 1 juli 2008 12:10
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Cluster Scheduler Question

Hi Henrik, many thanks for that, very helpful.

The reason I'm confused about the 'cluster scheduler' is that we also
have a 'TSM Exchange TDP Scheduler' running, and I assumed it was this
that was responsible for the backups?

Why the need for the two separate schedulers?

Thanks again.

Farren





-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Henrik Vahlstedt
Sent: 01 July 2008 10:58
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Cluster Scheduler Question

Hi,

First, de-select "affect group"  in the cluster resource properties for
the TSM Cluster Scheduler in cluster administrator, cluadmin.exe.
This prevents the whole cluster to failover when the TSM service stops
due to whatever.. ex. bad password.

Verify that the correct registry parameter is replicated as a part of
the cluster resource:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\Nodes\
\

Consider to set passexp=0 on the TSM server for the Exchange node.

Update PW on both cluster nodes.

"what does the Cluster Scheduler actually do?"
Backing up Exchange? :-) You will find the answer if you search on the
nodename and schedule in TSM.


//Henrik



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Minns, Farren - Chichester
Sent: den 1 juli 2008 11:31
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Cluster Scheduler Question

Hi All

TSM 5.4.1.2 on Solaris 2.9
Backing up Exchange (MS Windows Server 2003, RC2 SP") - 5.5.0.0 in a
clustered environment.

We had this set up by an outside company and are now seeing some
problems with the TSM Cluster Scheduler automatically failing over the
cluster due to a password issue (this is as far as I can see anyway).

So, the dumb question, what does the Cluster Scheduler actually do?
I can see there is a separate schedule for the Exchange TDP backups.

Thanks

Farren






This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally
privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If
you have received this message in error please tell us by reply and
delete all copies on your system.

Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your
own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage
arising out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email
traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security
reasons.

John Wiley & Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in
England with registered number 641132.

Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West
Sussex, PO19 8SQ.




---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.


This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally
privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If
you have received this message in error please tell us by reply and
delete all copies on your system.
 
Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your
own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage
arising out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email
traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security
reasons.

John Wiley & Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in
England

Re: TSM Cluster Scheduler Question

2008-07-01 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

First, de-select "affect group"  in the cluster resource properties for
the TSM Cluster Scheduler in cluster administrator, cluadmin.exe.
This prevents the whole cluster to failover when the TSM service stops
due to whatever.. ex. bad password.

Verify that the correct registry parameter is replicated as a part of
the cluster resource:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\Nodes\
\ 

Consider to set passexp=0 on the TSM server for the Exchange node.

Update PW on both cluster nodes.

"what does the Cluster Scheduler actually do?"
Backing up Exchange? :-) You will find the answer if you search on the
nodename and schedule in TSM.


//Henrik



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Minns, Farren - Chichester
Sent: den 1 juli 2008 11:31
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Cluster Scheduler Question

Hi All

TSM 5.4.1.2 on Solaris 2.9
Backing up Exchange (MS Windows Server 2003, RC2 SP") - 5.5.0.0 in a
clustered environment.

We had this set up by an outside company and are now seeing some
problems with the TSM Cluster Scheduler automatically failing over the
cluster due to a password issue (this is as far as I can see anyway).

So, the dumb question, what does the Cluster Scheduler actually do?
I can see there is a separate schedule for the Exchange TDP backups.

Thanks

Farren






This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally
privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If
you have received this message in error please tell us by reply and
delete all copies on your system.
 
Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your
own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage
arising out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email
traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security
reasons.

John Wiley & Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in
England with registered number 641132.

Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West
Sussex, PO19 8SQ.




---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Server stgpool volumes and GPT

2008-06-25 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
 
Thanks for the answer Skylar!

Offset, alligment or diskcrossing problem is an Intel architecture
problem hitting both Linux and Windows. In Windows you can use diskpar
or diskpart to overcome it. EMC have an white paper "Aligning GPT Basic
and Dynamic Disks For Microsoft Windows 2003".
However, we lazy uneducated Windows administrators don't tend to care
about it if we cant use a GUI...


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Skylar Thompson
Sent: den 23 juni 2008 16:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Server stgpool volumes and GPT

Henrik Vahlstedt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What evidence do you have that MBR volumes have better performance 
> than GPT volumes on Windows?

I've run into offset problems with DOS partitions on Linux, where the
offset forces every write at the filesystem level to be written to two
stripes rather than one. You can fix this with the "x b" command in
fdisk, or use LVM which doesn't have an offset.

I don't know if this is related to MBR/GPT on Windows though.

--
-- Skylar Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S048, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Server stgpool volumes and GPT

2008-06-23 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

What evidence do you have that MBR volumes have better performance than
GPT volumes on Windows?


//Henrik 


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: den 19 juni 2008 17:47
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Server stgpool volumes and GPT

Actually, you may get better performance out of Windows if you leave off
the GPT.  You don't want really large storage pool volumes anyway, so
partitioning it out with 2 TB File systems, would be a good idea.  That
would remove another level of complexity, and overhead on the server
itself.  The fewer things you have between the App (TSM) and the
hardware the better.

Or, better yet, use Linux and you'll get more out of your hardware.

See Ya'
Howard


> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:29 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Server stgpool volumes and GPT
> 
> We are putting up a "big honkin Dell server" for a new TSM server.
This
> box has 8=1TB internal drives.
> 
> There has been an argument going on about how to properly partition 
> this space, for the LZ.
> 
> We use GPT since standard tools don't like >2TB filesystems.
> 
> If we create a 6TB LZ with GPT, will TSM have a problem formatting 
> volumes in this space?
> 
> What is the max size of a disk storage pool volume, anyway?  I have 
> been scouring the Admin Guide/Reference and still haven't seen a fixed

> max value.  I did Google and found an IBM document that says a lot of 
> this info is undocumented.
> 
> BTW, Neither I nor my co-worker are receiving most mailings from this 
> list. Every day or two, some trickle through.  Can someone tell me who

> to contact at Marist to see what is going on?


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Stop Systemstate backup

2008-06-10 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
 
"DOMAIN SYSTEMSTATE -  (this line not used on clients older than 5.5)"

Which not support Windows 2000.


//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Compton
Sent: den 10 juni 2008 16:05
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Stop Systemstate backup

DOMAIN  SYSTEMSERVICES
DOMAIN  SYSTEMSTATE -  (this line not used on clients older than 5.5)

 
 
Adrian Compton
Aspen Pharmacare Port Elizabeth
tel: +2741 4072855
Fax: +2741 453 7452
Cell: +27823204495
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Mochnaczewski
Sent: 10 June 2008 15:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Stop Systemstate backup

Hi *,

I am having a problem trying to locate the exact synatx to exclude the
systemstate backups on a Windows box. Does anyone know what the syntax
is ?

Rich


  
Standard Life : 175 ans au coeur de nos vies Standard Life: Part of our
lives for 175 years
 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Stop Systemstate backup

2008-06-10 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

With w2k3, use "Domain -SystemState -SystemServices" in dsm.opt.


//Henrik


 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Mochnaczewski
Sent: den 10 juni 2008 15:43
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Stop Systemstate backup

Hi *,

I am having a problem trying to locate the exact synatx to exclude the
systemstate backups on a Windows box. Does anyone know what the syntax
is ?

Rich


  
Standard Life : 175 ans au coeur de nos vies Standard Life: Part of our
lives for 175 years
 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Throttle a Windows client?

2008-06-09 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

No, you can not limit the bandwidth within Windows for one application.
However some application have their own setting for throttling ex.
Backup Exec.

By design TSM client is set to use as much resources it needs during
backup ex. cpu, memory and network.
Regarding network traffic, IBM reluctant refuse to understand and
implement the consept of QoS, Qualtity of Service, in TSM.

Thinking of just one server/one OS when you try to implement a
restriction of how much network trafic TSM should be allowed to generate
doesn't scale very well. You could talk to your network guys and ask
them to implement QoS on port 1500/1501 on their routers and make sure
that TSM only uses thoose two ports.


//Henrik

 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tony Trinh
Sent: den 9 juni 2008 18:30
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Throttle a Windows client?

Shawn,

Have your network admin check the network 'flow control' on the network
switch ensure it's open to full. 


TT



The information contained in this email message and any attachments is
confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not an
addressee, you may not copy or disclose the information, or act upon it,
and you should delete it entirely from your email system. Please notify
the sender that you received this email in error.
  -Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shawn Drew
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 8:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Throttle a Windows client?

I imagine this topic would have been covered, but can't find anything on
it.

I don't think you can do it within TSM (correct me if I'm wrong) but
does anyone know how to limit the bandwidth that is used by the tsm
client on windows?
I.E. "Never use more than 20% of the network connection", "never exceed
5
mb/s etc."

Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew


This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in
error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not
in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either
whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can
not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its
subsidiaries) shall
(will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that
certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP
Paribas RCC, Inc.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: from SEZ

2008-05-09 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Yes, but the file will exist on tape due to Retain Extra Versions and
Retain Only Version.

But you can always create a Delete mgmtclass with appropiate settings
and bind the file to that mgmtclass, exclude the file and run expire
inventory. But that seems harder than Delete backup command. 


Thanks
Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Compton
Sent: den 9 maj 2008 09:30
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] from SEZ

You can put an exclude statement for the file in your opt file on the
node or client options file on the server side and it will expire at the
next backup.

Adrian Compton

IT Baan Operation/ Group IBM Tivoli Admin

Pharmacare Limited trading as Aspen Pharmacare

P O Box 4002

Korsten

Port Elizabeth

6014

Switchboard Tel No: +27 (0) 41 407 2111

Tel No: +27 (0) 41 407 2855

Fax: +27 (0) 41 453 7452

Cell: +27 (0) 82 320 4495

Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   This email is solely for the named
addressee.   Any unauthorised use or interception of this email, or the
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon the contents of this email, by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are
not the named addressee please notify us immediately by way of a reply
e-mail, and also delete this email and any attached files.

 

Disclaimer:  You must scan this email and any attached files for viruses
and/or any other defects.  Pharmacare Limited accepts no liability for
any loss, damages or consequence, whether direct, indirect,
consequential or economic, however caused, and whether by negligence or
otherwise, which may result directly or indirectly from this
communication or of any attached files.  

 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Lenssens
Sent: 09 May 2008 08:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] from SEZ

Hello,

 

Is it possible to delete one specific file from TSM?  TSM did a backup
of a not necessary large logfile of 40 GB and because of the 'Version
Data Exists'-policy parameter of 7  it takes a lot of space on the
tapes.  I work with TSM-server V5R2L2.0.

 

Many thanks

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: from SEZ

2008-05-09 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Yes, check dsmc.exe help 'delete backup' on the current node and then
run Expire inventory.

//Henrik
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Lenssens
Sent: den 9 maj 2008 08:42
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] from SEZ

Hello,

 

Is it possible to delete one specific file from TSM?  TSM did a backup
of a not necessary large logfile of 40 GB and because of the 'Version
Data Exists'-policy parameter of 7  it takes a lot of space on the
tapes.  I work with TSM-server V5R2L2.0.

 

Many thanks

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: How long should we keep volhist?

2008-04-25 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
".. but is it also updates for each time a volume is added or deleted
from a storagepool?"

Might consider doing a q volhist and check modification date on
volhist.out to get an answer if it gets updated..

-H.  

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: den 25 april 2008 13:24
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How long should we keep volhist?

Quoting Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Apr 25, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Jim Young wrote:
>
>> Whats the knock on effect of not clearing your volhist anyway?
>> Short of getting a large text file hanging around.
>
> The large, flat file doesn't just hang around: it is completely 
> rewritten at each volume transition, where the TSM server has to run 
> through all its volhistory entries, format, and write each entry to 
> the file designated by the VOLUMEHistory server option - no matter how

> busy it is with other tasks.
>

Is this true? I know the volhist files are updated each time a database
backup is completed, but is it also updates for each time a volume is
added or deleted from a storagepool? Of course, the volhist table in the
db is continuously updated, but that should not be to big a problem
(well, after about 5 years or so it might).

Are there any other downsides we can think of?

>   Richard Sims  http://people.bu.edu/rbs/



-- 

Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post, PLCS


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: How can I restore a file form the tape but I forget the path and filename of this file?

2008-04-18 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Even if TSM is a fantastic product it wont help you with restoring
unnamed and unknow files.

However if you feel like you will recognize the path/filename when you
see it you can 
always do a 'dsmc query backup' on the server of interest.


//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Yu Dong Dong (ITD)
Sent: den 18 april 2008 09:58
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] How can I restore a file form the tape but I forget
the path and filename of this file?

Hi all,

 How can I restore a file form the tape but I forget the path
and filename of this file?

 

Thanks 

 

DongDong Yu


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?"

2008-04-17 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
 
Hi,

Isnt dedup most beneficial at deduplicating databses ex. Oracle and
Domino etc...? No pre-compression or encryption.
Even Data Domain dedup thoose types av data pretty well.

But I tend to agree with your opinion about performance.

//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hans Christian Riksheim
Sent: den 17 april 2008 14:32
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?

We look at dedup VTL as a possible target for active storage pools
containing ordinary file backup. This way we don't risk very much if the
VTL breaks or the VTL's dedup index goes corrupt. I am a little
sceptical about the robustness of these products so I will not let these
VTL's play a too significant role in our setup. My sceptisism may of
course be totally unfounded.

For TDP-data which are written and read in large sequential chunks, tape
is just fine performance and cost wise. From what I have heard, it can
be hard to obtain any decent dedup compression for Oracle with dedup
VTLs and the performance is questionable.




Best regards

Hans Chr.

 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orin Rehorst
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:13 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM being abandoned?

A VTL vendor said he is seeing a number of mid-sized businesses
migrating from TSM to NBU (Symantec). Do you think this is true? My
concern is that the pool of support techs will shrink and put us in a
bind.

Regards,
Orin

Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston
This email
originates from Steria AS, Biskop Gunnerus' gate 14a, N-0051 OSLO,
http://www.steria.no. This email and any attachments may contain
confidential/intellectual property/copyright information and is only for
the use of the addressee(s). You are prohibited from copying,
forwarding, disclosing, saving or otherwise using it in any way if you
are not the addressee(s) or responsible for delivery. If you receive
this email by mistake, please advise the sender and cancel it
immediately. Steria may monitor the content of emails within its network
to ensure compliance with its policies and procedures. Any email is
susceptible to alteration and its integrity cannot be assured. Steria
shall not be liable if the message is altered, modified, falsified, or
even edited.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Delete volume problem

2008-04-02 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
I am not sure how you try to delete thoose volumes, but.

This should work.
Create a OS script with multiple lines like:
Dsmadsmc -id=x -password=y del vol xyz discarddata=yes wait=y
Dsmadsmc -id=x -password=y del vol zyx discarddata=yes wait=y
Etc.

If you create a script in TSM or run multiple del vol commands in a
macro you will get the deadlock you are seeing. Been there..



//Henrik





 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wanda Prather
Sent: den 2 april 2008 22:21
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Delete volume problem

No good way around it, except to run your DELETE VOLUMES serially and
with NOTHING ELSE going on.  Or upgrade past the bug.  Search
www.ibm.com:
IC50659

On 4/2/08, David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think there is an occasional problem with "Delete Volume"
> at that TSM server version that can hang things.
>
> I seem to recall is fixed in TSM 5.3.5.x or close.
>
> David Longo
>
> >>> Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/2/2008 2:02 
> >>> PM
> >>>
> We have a 5.3.4.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We are in 
> the process of migrating some of our offsite copies to newer tape 
> technology. Yesterday I finished backing up all the data in one of our

> primary tape pools to a new copy storage pool. This morning I started 
> deleting the volumes from the old copy storage pool previously used 
> for offsite copies of the same primary pool. The first couple of 
> 'delete volume' commands worked fine. The third one was running when 
> our automation started a snapshot database backup.
> The snapshot process froze with 0 of 0 pages backed up. The 'delete 
> volume' process froze. A number of migration processes running at the 
> time stopped moving data. Node sessions went into permanent run status

> and stopped moving data. I executed a 'cancel process' command for the

> 'delete volume' process. It had no visible effect. A little while 
> later I issued a 'cancel process' command for the snapshot process. It

> caused the status reported by 'query process' to change to 'Cancel 
> pending' but otherwise had no visible effect. I finally shut down the 
> TSM server. I then had to wait some minutes for a defunct dsmserv 
> process to go away before I could restart the TSM server.
>
> Later in the day our automation ran an incremental database backup.
> Once the backup process was safely under way I tried another 'delete 
> volume' command. The 'delete volume' process deleted a few hundred 
> files and then froze. Migration processes and node sessions stopped 
> moving data. The database backup continued to run until it had written

> all the necessary database pages and dismounted the output tape. It 
> then froze. I was once again unable to cancel either the database 
> backup or the 'delete volume' process. I had the same problem with a 
> defucnt dsmserv process when I stopped the server for the second time 
> that day.
>
> Are there any other TSM functions that cannot co-exist safely with 
> 'delete volume' processes? We are preparing to upgrade our TSM server 
> to 5.4.2.0. Will the de facto rules about when to run 'delete volume' 
> processes be different under this release?
>
>
>
> #
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
> private, proprietary, or legally privileged information.
> No privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive

> this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of 
> it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the 
> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, 
> distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the

> intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all 
> e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions 
> expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, 
> except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on 
> behalf of a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by 
> the entity to give such views or opinions.
> #
>


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Restoring with TDP for Exchange in a different location

2008-03-19 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi, 

The manual which is included in the TDP for Exchange package can guide
you in a restore operation.


//Henrik 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mario Behring
Sent: den 19 mars 2008 01:38
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Restoring with TDP for Exchange in a different
location

Hi list,

I have to restore the VIP Storage Group from Exchange, but I cannot do
it on the original location to avoid overwriting the files and exchange
databases that are there now. Can I do this? Where do I specify a new
location to restore these files?

Mario


 


Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Support w2k

2008-03-14 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&tc=SSGSG7&uid=swg21197133 ??

-H.
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard 
Coles
Sent: den 14 mars 2008 15:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Support w2k

>From what I have read in the Client readmes and other places the last client 
>to support W2K Server was 5.4.x.  I haven't seen any notices until the 5.5 
>client that W2K was not supported.

See Ya'
Howard

> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Christoph Pilgram
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:26 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Support w2k
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Does anybody know which tsm-client is supported to run on w2k-server 
> (last supported version I found was 5.3 that goes now out of support)
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Christoph Pilgram
> 
> Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG A Informationsverarbeitung
> Tel.: +49 (7351) 54-4051
> Fax: +49 (7351) 54-2157
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein; 
> Registergericht Mainz: HR A 22206; Komplementär Boehringer Ingelheim 
> Deutschland GmbH; Geschäftsführung: Ulrich Pitkamin (Vorsitzender), 
> Axel Eppert (stellv. Vorsitzender), Dr. Wolfgang Baiker, Hubertus von 
> Baumbach, Dr. Uwe Bücheler, Dr. Norbert Camp, Mark Hagmann, Dr. André 
> Hertkorn, Dr.
> Michel Pairet, Dr. Herbert Stein, Dr. Martin Wanning; Vorsitzender des
> Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Dr. Andreas Barner; Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein; 
> Registergericht Mainz: HR B 23260
> 
> Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Sie kann besonderem 
> rechtlichen Schutz unterliegen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat 
> sind, senden Sie bitte diese E-Mail an den Absender zurück, löschen 
> die eingegangene E- Mail und geben den Inhalt der E-Mail nicht weiter. 
> Jegliche unbefugte Bearbeitung, Nutzung, Vervielfältigung oder 
> Verbreitung ist verboten. / This e-mail is confidential and may also 
> be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please 
> reply to sender, delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to 
> any person. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying or 
> distribution is strictly prohibited.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Support w2k

2008-03-14 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Well you said it, 5.3 client. Upgrade your OS or extend your support contract, 
$$$. 

Or continue to use 5.3 unsupported with a 5.4 server which from what I heard 
will be supported for 5 years.
I have doubts that there will be new problems introduced with w2k servers and 
TSM...


//Henrik





-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph 
Pilgram
Sent: den 14 mars 2008 15:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Support w2k

Hi all,

Does anybody know which tsm-client is supported to run on w2k-server (last 
supported version I found was 5.3 that goes now out of support)

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Christoph Pilgram

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG A Informationsverarbeitung
Tel.: +49 (7351) 54-4051
Fax: +49 (7351) 54-2157
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein; 
Registergericht Mainz: HR A 22206; Komplementär Boehringer Ingelheim 
Deutschland GmbH; Geschäftsführung: Ulrich Pitkamin (Vorsitzender), Axel Eppert 
(stellv. Vorsitzender), Dr. Wolfgang Baiker, Hubertus von Baumbach, Dr. Uwe 
Bücheler, Dr. Norbert Camp, Mark Hagmann, Dr. André Hertkorn, Dr.
Michel Pairet, Dr. Herbert Stein, Dr. Martin Wanning; Vorsitzender des
Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Dr. Andreas Barner; Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein; 
Registergericht Mainz: HR B 23260

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Sie kann besonderem rechtlichen 
Schutz unterliegen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind, senden Sie bitte 
diese E-Mail an den Absender zurück, löschen die eingegangene E-Mail und geben 
den Inhalt der E-Mail nicht weiter. Jegliche unbefugte Bearbeitung, Nutzung, 
Vervielfältigung oder Verbreitung ist verboten. / This e-mail is confidential 
and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient 
please reply to sender, delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to 
any person. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution 
is strictly prohibited.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: AW: Interesting problem in MS-Win restoer -- anyone seen something like this before?

2008-03-11 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hello,

Only curious, is this one solved?


//Henrik 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan 
Holzwarth
Sent: 10. mars 2008 20:33
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: Interesting problem in MS-Win restoer -- anyone seen 
something like this before?

In the past we had 2 times a similar problem:
first time (tsm server on mvs) the ip sequence number did a wrap around and was 
not properly handled by mvs. (So large restores always stopped at different 
positions) sencond time (tsm server on nt) we realized that our network 
backbone did corrupt our ip pakets without crc errors! we could view the 
problem by adding crc tothe communication layer within tsm. The restore to that 
time (a exchange db) was no more possible since the backup data were not 
correct. The restore always stopped at the same position.
Regards
Stefan Holzwarth

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag 
> von Kauffman, Tom
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 15:05
> An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Betreff: Interesting problem in MS-Win restoer -- anyone seen 
> something like this before?
> 
> We've been trying to restore a 38 GB file to a Win2003 SP1 server; the 
> restore comes to a near halt at 31.8 GB.
> 
> At the TSM server side (5.5.0.0) we see 'sendw', and if we leave 
> everything alone the restore continues at an incredibly slow pace (20 
> MB in 8 hours).
> 
> On the client side - CPU utilization drops to between 1 and 3 percent, 
> but task manager shows 'system idle process' using 99% of the cpu.
> 
> The results have been the same with both the TSM 5.1.6 client and the 
> 5.5 client, using both the GUI and the command line.
> 
> The only errors that show up on either system occur when we kill the 
> restore.
> 
> And (FWIW) there is no anti-virus scanner running while the restore is 
> running.
> 
> I'm lost - any ideas/suggestions?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Tom Kauffman
> NIBCO, Inc
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the 
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take 
> action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in 
> error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly 
> delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We 
> do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the 
> transmission of this message.
> 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Internal error DBLOG666 (5.4.0.3 Win32-Server)

2008-02-18 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hello,

I would open a support case asap!

Neither Google or IBM support pages have any relevant information about
these error.


//Henrik


 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Bartl
Sent: den 18 februari 2008 11:18
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Internal error DBLOG666 (5.4.0.3 Win32-Server)

Good morning everybody,

our TSM server won't start and brings one of those feared ANRD
messages (see below).
First I thought about the Log being full and did an extend of 100MB
(from 1 to 10100).

Any ideas how to recover from this error? Any experience with upgrading
the server to the newest pft/fixtest version in this state?

Best hope and wishes,
Michael Bartl


C:\Programme\Tivoli\TSM\server>dsmserv
ANR0900I Processing options file C:\Programme\Tivoli\TSM\server
\dsmserv.opt.
ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 15:42:39 on Mar 30 2007.

Tivoli Storage Manager for Windows
Version 5, Release 4, Level 0.3

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2007.
All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR4726I The ICC support module has been loaded.
ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 10100 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 6 megabytes.
ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress.
ANR0285I Database page shadowing started using file dbpgshdw.bdt.
ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress.
ANR0354I Recovery log redo pass in progress.
ANR0355I Recovery log undo pass in progress.
ANRD pkthread.c(853): ThreadId <0> Run-time assertion "CmpLsn(
*pageLsnP,
hdrP->updtLsn ) != LESSTHAN" at dblog.c(1130) failed.
ANRD ThreadId <0> issued message  from:
ANR7837S Internal error DBLOG666 detected.

ANRD ThreadId <0> issued message 7837 from:
Entering exception handler.
Leaving exception handler.

C:\Programme\Tivoli\TSM\server>


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Creating the TSM server service in Windows manually

2008-02-06 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
One dark night 2005 I thought documentation should be correct, IC45255.
See Admin ref, dsmserv format.

Thanks
Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: 6. februar 2008 17:16
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Creating the TSM server service in Windows manually

A hypothetical question occurred to me one dark night: 

 

You normally create the Windows service called TSM Server 1 (or 2 or
whatever) through the TSM Management Console when you first set up a TSM
server. Does anyone know how you could create the service through an OS
command-line interface?

 

--

Mark Stapleton

CDW Berbee

System engineer

7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140

Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511

763-592-5963

www.berbee.com  

 

 


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Win2K3 backup performance

2008-01-31 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

Have you recently upgraded the client, and are you using scheduled
backups with sessioinitiation=serveronly?
>From 5.3.5.3 to latest 5.4 client I have an issue with above settings
and performance. 
Ie, with newer clients performace drops with 70-80% when I backup larger
files > 1Gb.
Dsmc and sessioinitiation=clientorserver works fine.

//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sam Sheppard
Sent: den 1 februari 2008 01:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Win2K3 backup performance

We have a Windows 2003 client running TSM 5.4.1 backing up to a Solaris
10 TSM server running the 5.4.1 server.

The client has several very large files to be backed up (300-400GB). We
are finding on a 1.3GB test file that we can only get a throughput of
about 10MB/sec (looks like 100Mb speed) even though this client is
configured on a GigE VLan.  One interesting aspect just discovered is
that a restore of the same file got speeds of 37MB/sec, which is about
the same as an FTP of the same file from the client to the server.
Client, switch, and server all set to 1GB full.

At this point, I'm completely mystified as to what might be behind these
performance anomalies.  I would expect much higher throughput rates on
all of these tests, but would be satisfied if the backup would just
perform at the same speed as the others.

Client options:  Server Options:

TCPWindowsize   63   TCPWindowsize  131072
TCPBuffsize  32

Thanks
Sam Sheppard
San Diego Data Processing Corp.
(858)-581-9668


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Strange ANR0536W all of a sudden

2008-01-31 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi Zoltan

Some readme files says that data format changed in TSM 5.4 which is
probably why you see this error. I have seen it in older versions of TSM
when the backup process changed mgmtclass between directorypool and
diskpool. Test not to use DIRMC?

An 'help 0536' indicates that we should follow the support matrix. :-)
However this doesnt explain why you see the errors but more suggest
where to spend the trouble shooting time.


//Henrik



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: den 31 januari 2008 15:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Strange ANR0536W all of a sudden

Out of the blue, quite a few of my Windows clients are generating these
error messages:

1/31/2008 3:30:37 AM ANR0536W Transaction failed for session 121443 for
node ROSE-OTS (WinNT) - downlevel client does not support format of
stored files.

Considering the server hasn't changed since it was installed (5.5.0.0
eagerly awaiting first patches), I am trying to figure out what would
cause these errors ?  Yes, the clients are a little behind (5.3.x).

A quick Google search did not reveal much on these errors.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


How to map a volume id to a volume name?

2008-01-30 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

How do I map a volume id to a volume name? Any show command, or?


Thanks
Henrik


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: Fw: DISASTER: How to do a LOT of restores?

2008-01-22 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi,

So far so good, move data, backup sets, active copyppool. You got plenty
to work with. I just wanted to add a example restore command.

Dsmc restore e:\?* e:\ -subdir=y or equivalent. In tests I did with 600k
files I reduced restore times from 4h17min to 52min. 
Processing time without '?' in the restore syntax took "forever", if 3
hours counts as forever. 


//Henrik


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.