Re: [AFMUG] crowdsource troubleshooting

[Jacob Turner]

The Prism Gen 2 uses "standard" UBNT passive 24v POE.  +4,5 -7,8.  I've
seen netonix switches claiming as much as 12 watts draw from one when
running.  I wouldn't be surprised if their startup draw may be a bit higher.

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:16 AM,  wrote:

> I need help in understanding a product failure.
>
> I have now had two customers with similar failures in my POE fuse
> product.  The fuses are blowing.
> So far it is limited to the fuses on pins 4/5.
>
> One customer is using:
> UBNT 5AC Prism Gen 2 radio, Mikrotik 411 boards, using both poes and
> netonix as the power supply.
>
> What pins and polarities does that radio use for POE?  How much current?
>
> I may need higher rated fuses or slower fuses.  But I can only go so high
> before it is not protecting Netonix thus becoming an expensive CAT5
> splice.
>
> My ideas so far:
>
> I need a slower reacting fuse.
>
> I need a higher amp rating fuse.  (not sure how high I can go and still
> protect Netonix)
>
> Some loads have unanticipated currents on those wires.
>
> Plugging in when powered may cause a connection sequence problem where if
> pin 4 makes contact first the whole load will go through that wire and blow
> that fuse.
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] RF Calibration Failure ADI Catalina R0 chip not supported!

[Jacob Barnard]

Hey Andreas,

What Firmware version are you running?  Cambium had an FPGA fix 
implemented for some of the fail cases of this nature with these in 
v14.1.2(+).  If you're already deployed with that or higher, however, 
you're quite unfortunately looking at a chipset defect which you will 
have to RMA replace.


Jacob


On 3/17/2018 10:21 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:


Hi All,

I’ve never seen this before…but it looks like I have a broken AP…any 
way to fix without a climb??


450 AP 2.4Ghz

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com <http://www.silowireless.com/>

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or 
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.




--

Jacob Barnard
Network Infrastructure | Software Developer
Amplex Internet
22690 Pemberville Rd
Luckey | OH | 43443
T. 419-837-5015 x1045
F. 567-249-0087
E: jbarn...@amplex.net

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium repair times?

[Jacob Barnard]

Hey Seth,

Long time lurker here, thanks for giving me an excuse to get out of the 
shadows - we've had turn around times stretching 3-4 months on ptp820x 
equipment repairs: we send them to Cambium, Cambium sends them to 
Ceragon in Israel and forgets about them, they eventually get shipped 
back to Cambium after all parties have forgotten about them and we get 
surprised when they show up.


-Jacob


On 2/20/2018 3:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
How long does it usually take Cambium to repair something? I have an 
820S that failed under warranty waiting at their repair facility since 
December 8th with no progress since then other than it was received. 
I've never had anything repaired by them before.


~Seth


--

Jacob Barnard
Network Infrastructure | Software Developer
Amplex Internet
22690 Pemberville Rd
Luckey | OH | 43443
T. 419-837-5015 x1045
F. 567-249-0087
E: jbarn...@amplex.net

Re: [AFMUG] Lacp/lag Netonix to edgeswitch

[Jacob Turner]

This works for me


​

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:55 PM, TJ Trout  wrote:

> Hello ,
>
> Anyone with a working configuration of lacp or lag between a matonix and
> edgeswitch that could send over a screenshot of the configuration of each
> device if you have it working?
>
> Having a little bit of trouble and would like a starting point before I go
> back to the lab.
>
> Thanks
>
> TJ
>

Re: [AFMUG] Is POE out settings on new powerbox pro different?

[Jacob Turner]

Sounds like you may not have enough current to power on all of the prisms.
You certainly want a 24v 2.5A power supply at least.  You also may have to
use the barrel plug instead of POE in to get enough juice.

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tim Reichhart <
timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote:

>
> See ethernet1 doesn't have option for poe out only poe in so ports 2-5
> have option for poe but it only works when you force it on. Because I tried
> with rocket m5 prism ac it would come on but no lan lights if you have 3
> rockets plugged in. First rocket m5 lan light would come on then if I plug
> in the other 2 rockets I can only get gps lights to come on and no lan
> lights. So I'm little confused on this.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is POE out settings on new powerbox pro different?
> From: "Mathew Howard" 
> To: af 
> Date: 07/07/17 02:36:04am
>
> Don't you just turn it on? I'm not sure where it is in the CLI, but in
> Winbox it should be under the PoE settings on each port just like it always
> was.
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Tim Reichhart  net> wrote:
>
> Then how would I be turn 2-5 ports on for poe?  There have be some kind of
> special setting to turn it on.
>
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is POE out settings on new powerbox pro different?
> From: "Mathew Howard" 
> To: af 
> Date: 2017/07/06 22:58:16
>
>
> It looks like they removed that setting.
>
>
> I haven't seen the PowerBox Pro yet, but I'm assuming it's got the same
> guts as the hEX PoE (the gigabit version). We've had quite a few of those
> running for awhile now, and so far I haven't had any need to enable the
> long cable mode, like on the old ones, so maybe they reworked the design
> enough that it just isn't necessary anymore.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Tim Reichhart  net> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> I have brand new powerbox poe and when I try to set with this command
> /interface ethernet poe settings set ether1-poe-in-long-cable=yes I get
> "bad command name settings (line 1 column 25) is there something they
> changed that you cant set this anymore in terminal?
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Addition to new site.

[Jacob Turner]

Gorgeous site!

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Sam Lambie  wrote:

> Cambium Medusa. Synced with Packetflux Syncbox 12. Powered with
> Syncinjectors by Packetflux.
>
> Just put it up today so no performance reviews yet. 101 customers coming
> from a 450 AP.
>
> Psyched
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP1000 Max PTP length

[Jacob Turner]

If you can deal with the slightly higher latency involved in running
tdd-ptp mode I'm not sure that there is a hard limit for ePMP.  If there is
it is likely 60+ miles.  Running ePTP mode though there are distance limits
of 32 miles for 20Mhz and 15 Miles for 40Mhz.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Jason Wilson 
wrote:

> The subject says it all.  What is the Maximum link length that a ePMP1000
> GPS Lite 5ghz will allow?   More than likely replacing a Mimosa b5c link
> that is 23.1 miles.  Mountaintop to Mountaintop.  It looks like I have had
> a third b5c die.  I'll know more once we get on site.
>
>
> Jason Wilson
> Remotely Located
> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736>
> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell
> www.remotelylocated.com
>

Re: [AFMUG] powercode monitoring dead

[Jacob]

I believe they have emergency support available at 920-351-1010.

Hope that helps!

On 8/5/2015 12:10 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:


IIRC the only need for DNS is validity to confirm the license for the 
pretty graphs.


Is the BMU up to date?

My guess would be something is causing the probe script to hang, but 
it's tough to say.  Call in the AM :/


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 5, 2015 12:53 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote:


Rebooted this evening, pushed the pending update this morning
hoping it was that (two revisions pending) no joy.Im at 20gb of
91gb space on the VHD. This is a massive virtual server terabyte
raid 10 array powercode datastore 16 core 64gb ram host. Only
thing on it is powercode and two lightly hit DNS servers behind a
firewall that shows little traffic, so not likely an external issue

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

Disk full?  Are you monitoring the servers health?

Might want to try rebooting the billing server, do a snapshot
before though.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 5, 2015 12:45 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
wrote:

bandwidth gathering seems to be functional, probes are
busted, about every tenth click on reprobe gives me a
green box, but it never populates the probes. I rebooted
the bmu when the mirror was still present and probes
worked during the resync, but failed again at some point,
subsequent reboots would not replicate the temporary
functionality.

I cannot find any devices, customer or infrastructure that
are working, so it seems the entire module is failing, not
just hanging at some point in the polling as best I can tell

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

So probes are what's busted? What about bandwidth
collection?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 5, 2015 12:31 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote:

anybody using powercode and your monitoring is
dead? Hopefully its just us and not systemic.
Apparently they tested and they can kick probes
off on the back end, its just not logging. real
time tools work, so its not a communication issue,
we didnt make any system changes near the failure.
The entire network monitoring component seems to
be croaked. Ive removed mirrors, minimized down to
a single bmu, synchronized, restarted BMUs,
restarted the billing server, cussed and got
drunk, nothing seems to work.
I cant say Im all that excited with responsiveness
at bertram since the coup so Im reaching out to
the community hoping somebody has this happen
occasionally and its something like running some
archaic linux command and burning sage.
Our customer facing staff is bright as a brick
when it comes to using the statuses as it is and
this is going to be a disaster, no matter how much
i try to show them. We have 3/4 technical staff
tied up all day tomorrow migrating an office
domain so that coupled with the inevitable
hangover is going to make this situation salty

-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but

you don't see your team as part of yourself you
have already failed as part of the team.




-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but

you don't see your team as part of yourself you
have already failed as part of the team.




-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see

your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.