[Asterisk-Users] Re: 5, 000 concurrent calls system rollout question

2006-02-02 Thread Mike Hammett 
Why is using ulaw or alaw an unlikely scenario?  I wouldn't use anything but 
ulaw\alaw.  The Bells can compete on price and will if they have to.  Where 
they CAN'T compete is quality.  If there were something better than 711, I'd 
offer that.  Well, there is 722, but not many things support it.




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 19



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question (Vic)
  2. How to handle provider UNREACHABLE in the dialplan?
 (Ronald Wiplinger)
  3. delaying answer for a number of rings or an amount of time
 (Brian J. Murrell)
  4. RE: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question
 (Michael Loftis)
  5. Re: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question
 (Michael Loftis)
  6. RE: Directed Call Pickup (Alex Barnes)
  7. Re: ISDN Eicon Diva Server V-BRI (Bartosz Jozwiak)
  8. RE: RE: 5, 000 concurrent calls system rollout question
 (William Boehlke)
  9. Re: ISDN Eicon Diva Server V-BRI (Jens Vagelpohl)
 10. Re: RE: Rewind MusicOnHold? (Dan Journo)
 11. Re: ISDN Eicon Diva Server V-BRI (Armin Schindler)
 12. Agents, queues and zombies (Steve Rawlings)
 13. Fw: Agents, queues and zombies (Steve Rawlings)
 14. Re: ISDN Eicon Diva Server V-BRI (Armin Schindler)
 15. Re: OT O'Reilly Asterisk TFOT (James Ronald)
 16. Re: Blocked Callerid ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 17. Re: fax possibilities ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 18. Re: RE: Rewind MusicOnHold? (Dan Journo)
 19. RE: OT O'Reilly Asterisk TFOT (Michael Collins)
 20. Re: OT O'Reilly Asterisk TFOT (Mark Phillips)
 21. RE: Anyone know a good ITSP in Canada that supports*?
 (Technical Support)
 22. Slightly OT: OpenPBX.org and Freeswitch (Michael Collins)


--

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:17:03 -0700
From: Michael Loftis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout
question
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed



--On February 3, 2006 3:56:21 AM +0900 Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi, Joash,

thank you for your email. I was very relieved to hear that someone was
already doing this.

Can you please tell me more about your test? Why did you test it in a
first place?

For me, we need to come up with a system that needs to:

1. Handle 5,000 inbound SIP calls

2. offer IVR capability

3. Billing


You'd probably have to do some of your own work on this.  * makes 'CDR'
records but...well...you have to be careful how you do your scripts if you
want legible/useable CDRs.  There are some apps out there though that will
process and do some sort of billing for CDRs not sure of what where.



I thought that Asterisk would be up to the task, but, I am not sure as
to:

1. How many servers should I consider? 4? 10? Obviously, we will be
talking about probably core Xeon servers if this is what we need.


I'd say atleast 10maybe more...depending wholly on codec/transcoding
and amount of IVR scripting.



2. How hard would it be to implement?


Well...since your not well versed with *, and you're having trouble
understanding the difference between a protocol and a codec, it might be
really difficult for you.  You might want to farm it out.  There are a LOT
of * consultancies out there now.  If you can get up to speed on asterisk
pretty quickly and the various protocols and codecs then it's not
impossible.  The kicker is all the management/maintenance UI's and such.
But you might be able to use something like Signates sigMAN (never used it
or their products).



3. How bad is g729 quality?

4. IVR : if the call is SIP, can we do prompts without transcoding?


You're confusing protocols with codec's here again.  SIP is not a codec.
That said if your SIP client is using GSM and there are GSM prompts
available then the asterisk playback functions will use the GSM encoded
prompts.

Earlier you'd mentioned using POTS lines coming in/out.  If you're
gatewaying 5k POTS lines you'll need a lot of machines.  Because you'll be
doing  a lot of transcoding POTS is ulaw or alaw (depending on where in 
the

world you are) and unless you use (uncompressed) ulaw or alaw on your SIP
clients (very unlikely scenario) you'll be transcoding to/from GSM. G.729

[Asterisk-Users] Re: ztdummy

2006-01-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
So since the ztdummy driver is running on the host OS, and Asterisk is 
running in a VPS, what driver files do I need to pass through to the VPS for 
Asterisk to properly see ztdummy?


How do I test to see if Asterisk knows ztdummy is present or not on that 
particular VPS?


The /dev/zap directory has the files channel, ctl, pseudo, and timer.  Which 
of those do I need to pass through?  Are there more elsewhere?


The ztdummy is actually running on the host OS, which is not affected (IIRC) 
by any virtualization controls, so the interrupts/second shouldn't be an 
issue.




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 175



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. Chan_capi on builds 79558320 strangeness ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  2. S100-FX v2.0 (Mike Hammett)
  3. Alex Tew interview made possible because of Simon @ Simwood
 eSMS (Ronald Lewis)
  4. How to put peers into Realtime (Ronald Wiplinger)
  5. Re: transfer, recording ... (Ronald Wiplinger)
  6. paging agi (Jeremy)
  7. Re: Chan_capi on builds 79558320 strangeness (Armin Schindler)
  8. Max concurrent calls (Andrew Nowrot)
  9. Re: ztdummy (Tzafrir Cohen)
 10. Re: Max concurrent calls (Zoa)
 11. Asterisk authorization (Sam Tam)
 12. RE: Dynamically disabling echo cancellation (Zap).
 (Koopmann, Jan-Peter)
 13. Re: Max concurrent calls (Jean-Michel Hiver)
 14. Re: paging agi (Tzafrir Cohen)
 15. RE: Chan_capi on builds 79558320 strangeness ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 16. ASTPP (Ronald Ramos)
 17. Re: Max concurrent calls (Andrew Nowrot)
 18. Offtopic: Auto provioning Snom 360 (Erik)
 19. RE: Announcement: Snom 360 with integrated XML Objects
 (Dovid Bender)
 20. Re: Asterisk authorization (Umair Bari)
 21. Re: Max concurrent calls (Andrew Nowrot)
 22. Packeting multiple GSM frames in one IP packet - Help needed.
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 23. Re: Max concurrent calls (Jean-Michel Hiver)
 24. Re: Max concurrent calls (Jean-Michel Hiver)
 25. DeadAGI and Hangup on channel (Grigoriy Puzankin)


--

Message: 9
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:58:43 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ztdummy
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:10:09PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:

I'm running a VPS and I need to pass the device drivers from the
host OS to the VPS.  What files do I need to pass through for
ztdummy to work?  I'm assuming they're in /dev/zap, but I'm not
sure which ones are needed.


ztdummy (of kernel 2.6) should not require anything from the host.
However are you sure you can use different kernels for the host and the
guest with your VPS?

It does generate a load of 1000 interrupts per second. This means tha
tyou always need CPU time. And a timely response of it.

--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend



-- 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: 5, 000 concurrent calls system rollout question

2006-01-28 Thread Mike Hammett 

What about IAX - SIP or IAX - IAX?



Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 5:43 AM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 185



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. RE: Context for SIP incoming (newbie question?) (Nabeel Jafferali)
  2. RE: DTMF's indescipherable, but voice clean! (Nabeel Jafferali)
  3. Re: Installing the none commercial intel g729 codecsinto
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2? (Rob Lith)
  4. Re: G729 Commercial Licenses. (Rob Lith)
  5. Re: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question (Rob Lith)
  6. Re: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question (Leo Ann Boon)
  7. (Un)PauseQeueMamber usage (Joe)
  8. Simple question about ringing multiple phones (extensions)?
 (Martin Joseph)
  9. Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No IN and OUT on ISDN line at the
 same (Ralf Mueller)
 10. RE : SPAM:  [Asterisk-Users] fxo/fxs cards with 8 ports
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 11. Re: Simple question about ringing multiple phones
 (extensions)? (Ronald Wiplinger)
 12. Re: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question (Zoa)
 13. Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No IN and OUT on ISDN line at the
 same (Armin Schindler)
 14. RE: Simple question about ringing multiple
 phones(extensions)? (Henk Dick)
 15. Trunk is not released ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 16. RE: Lockups since upgrade 1.2.3 - anyone else? Anyideas?
 (James Sturges)
 17. RE: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No IN and OUT on ISDN line at the
 same ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 18. Re: Trunk is not released (Tom Paseka)
 19. Re: Nagios and Asterisk (Michiel van Baak)
 20. Re: shared fxo line (Wilson Pickett)
 21. Re: Trunk is not released (Tom Paseka)


--

Message: 12
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:03:56 +0200
From: Zoa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout
question
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP


It can be done, are those 3000 calls sip to sip ? If so it could easily
be done, if they are not sip to sip you will need a bunch of servers.

Zoa.

Vic wrote:


Hi,

we are currently considering different options for rolling out a large
scale IP PBX to handle around 3,000 + concurrent calls.

Can this be done with Asterisk? Has it been done before?

I really would like an input on this.

Thanks!



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 





--


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: ztdummy

2006-01-27 Thread Mike Hammett 
It does use the same kernel for everything.  It's a specially modified 
kernel for the VPS support.  I guess the only way to see if ztdummy works in 
the VPS is to try it.




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 175



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. Chan_capi on builds 79558320 strangeness ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  2. S100-FX v2.0 (Mike Hammett)
  3. Alex Tew interview made possible because of Simon @ Simwood
 eSMS (Ronald Lewis)
  4. How to put peers into Realtime (Ronald Wiplinger)
  5. Re: transfer, recording ... (Ronald Wiplinger)
  6. paging agi (Jeremy)
  7. Re: Chan_capi on builds 79558320 strangeness (Armin Schindler)
  8. Max concurrent calls (Andrew Nowrot)
  9. Re: ztdummy (Tzafrir Cohen)
 10. Re: Max concurrent calls (Zoa)
 11. Asterisk authorization (Sam Tam)
 12. RE: Dynamically disabling echo cancellation (Zap).
 (Koopmann, Jan-Peter)
 13. Re: Max concurrent calls (Jean-Michel Hiver)
 14. Re: paging agi (Tzafrir Cohen)
 15. RE: Chan_capi on builds 79558320 strangeness ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 16. ASTPP (Ronald Ramos)
 17. Re: Max concurrent calls (Andrew Nowrot)
 18. Offtopic: Auto provioning Snom 360 (Erik)
 19. RE: Announcement: Snom 360 with integrated XML Objects
 (Dovid Bender)
 20. Re: Asterisk authorization (Umair Bari)
 21. Re: Max concurrent calls (Andrew Nowrot)
 22. Packeting multiple GSM frames in one IP packet - Help needed.
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 23. Re: Max concurrent calls (Jean-Michel Hiver)
 24. Re: Max concurrent calls (Jean-Michel Hiver)
 25. DeadAGI and Hangup on channel (Grigoriy Puzankin)





--

Message: 9
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:58:43 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ztdummy
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:10:09PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:

I'm running a VPS and I need to pass the device drivers from the
host OS to the VPS.  What files do I need to pass through for
ztdummy to work?  I'm assuming they're in /dev/zap, but I'm not
sure which ones are needed.


ztdummy (of kernel 2.6) should not require anything from the host.
However are you sure you can use different kernels for the host and the
guest with your VPS?

It does generate a load of 1000 interrupts per second. This means tha
tyou always need CPU time. And a timely response of it.

--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend



--


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] ztdummy

2006-01-26 Thread Mike Hammett 



I'm running a VPS and I need to pass the device 
drivers from the host OS to the VPS. What files do I need to pass through 
for ztdummy to work? I'm assuming they're in /dev/zap, but I'm not sure 
which ones are needed.


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] S100-FX v2.0

2006-01-26 Thread Mike Hammett 



I just saw the S100-FX v2.0 on eBay. I was wondering if anyone has tried it out 
and what their opinion of it was.


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] make linux26

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Hammett 



I thought I read somewhere that you no longer have 
to do a special make command for the 2.6 kernel. Is this true, or should I 
still make linux26? I'm having problems getting anything zaptel to load 
properly.


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel issues

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Hammett 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# which modprobe
/sbin/modprobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# modprobe --version
module-init-tools version 3.1-pre5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dmesg | tail
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
ztdummy: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
ztdummy: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
ztdummy: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be 
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'



It looks like my gcc versions are different from the one that made the 
kernel and the one that made the zaptel stuff.


So then of the zt lines, do I only need:

install ztdummy /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install ztdummy  /sbin/ztcfg




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 4:49 AM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 82



--

Message: 12
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:52:20 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel issues
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:39:18AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
On a side note:  When poking around, I noticed in the zaptel Makefile 
that there is a section talking about ztdummy automatically being 
included on 2.6 kernels.  Is this correct?


On to the main topic:  Any ideas for troubleshooting this?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/zaptel start
Loading zaptel framework:  FATAL: Error inserting zaptel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format

   [FAILED]
Waiting for zap to come online...Error: missing /dev/zap!


[EMAIL PROTECTED] libpri-1.2.1]# modprobe ztdummy
WARNING: Error inserting zaptel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format
WARNING: Error inserting zaptel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format
FATAL: Error inserting ztdummy 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/ztdummy.ko): Invalid module format

FATAL: Error running install command for ztdummy


Could you please provide the output of following:

 which modprobe
 modprobe --version

To make things simpler, do away with the stuff that the zaptel install
puts in /etc/modprobe.d/zaptel (or /etc/modprobe.conf ).

(ztdummy needs no ztcfg run after it)

Also, please provide the latest relevant kernel log messages:

 dmesg | tail

--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE : [Asterisk-Users] make linux26

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Hammett 

Yeah, that's where I saw contradicting what I saw elsewhere.



Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:48 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 141



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


--

Message: 23
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:37:55 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE : [Asterisk-Users] make linux26
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID:
!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACABgARuRp1ly/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi Mike,

You must continue - for zaptel only - to make linux26, as it is 
described

in the companion file README.Linux26 in the Zaptel folder
(/usr/src/zaptel).
Read the text from this file, as suggested in its title :

To build for Linux 2.6, first you must be sure that you have a
symlink to your linux-2.6 sources in /usr/src/linux-2.6.  The 2.6
kernel no longer needs the full sourcecode to build against it.  You
can create the symlink to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/ and then
you can type:

# make linux26
# make install

Note that you will also need CRC-CCITT functions compiled
with your kernel or as a kernel module.  These can be
selected from the Library Routines submenu during kernel
configuration via make menuconfig

It is a good habit to read all this README... files before to do
something, as it is important to read any user manual for any sofisticated
equipment  ;-)

Good luck !

Best Regards,
Francois BERGERET,
France.


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Mike 
Hammett

Envoyé : lundi 23 janvier 2006 22:10
À : asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Objet : [Asterisk-Users] make linux26


I thought I read somewhere that you no longer have to do a special make
command for the 2.6 kernel.  Is this true, or should I still make linux26?
I'm having problems getting anything zaptel to load properly.



Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060123/9b097a35/attachment-0001.htm




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Zaptel issues

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Hammett 
Yeah, recompiling the kernel is a bit over my head, but I don't want to 
install an older gcc, so I'll just have to await some hand-holding from the 
people that put my kernel together (OpenVZ).




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:02 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 143



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


--

Message: 15
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:35:28 -0300
From: Facundo Ameal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel issues
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think you have comiled your kernel with a version of gcc and zaptel
with another one, Compile zaptel drivers with gcc-3.3 and you will
solve it, otherwise, you cas recompile your kernel with the new
version of gcc.

i also had that problem.

2006/1/23, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# which modprobe
/sbin/modprobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# modprobe --version
module-init-tools version 3.1-pre5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dmesg | tail
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
ztdummy: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should 
be

'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
ztdummy: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should 
be

'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
zaptel: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should be
'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'
ztdummy: version magic '2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.4' should 
be

'2.6.8-022stab061.1 686 4KSTACKS gcc-3.3'


It looks like my gcc versions are different from the one that made the
kernel and the one that made the zaptel stuff.

So then of the zt lines, do I only need:

install ztdummy /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install ztdummy  /sbin/ztcfg




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 4:49 AM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 82


 --

 Message: 12
 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:52:20 +0200
 From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel issues
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:39:18AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
 On a side note:  When poking around, I noticed in the zaptel Makefile
 that there is a section talking about ztdummy automatically being
 included on 2.6 kernels.  Is this correct?

 On to the main topic:  Any ideas for troubleshooting this?

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/zaptel start
 Loading zaptel framework:  FATAL: Error inserting zaptel
 (/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module 
 format

[FAILED]
 Waiting for zap to come online...Error: missing /dev/zap!


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] libpri-1.2.1]# modprobe ztdummy
 WARNING: Error inserting zaptel
 (/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module 
 format

 WARNING: Error inserting zaptel
 (/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module 
 format

 FATAL: Error inserting ztdummy
 (/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/ztdummy.ko): Invalid module 
 format

 FATAL: Error running install command for ztdummy

 Could you please provide the output of following:

  which modprobe
  modprobe --version

 To make things simpler, do away with the stuff that the zaptel install
 puts in /etc/modprobe.d/zaptel (or /etc/modprobe.conf ).

 (ztdummy needs

[Asterisk-Users] RTP redirect system usage

2006-01-16 Thread Mike Hammett 



If the RTP is redirected, does this put the system 
under a smaller load? Obviously less network usage, but what about 
processor usage, etc.? I'd assume so, but some times ya never 
know.


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] SIP RTP

2006-01-14 Thread Mike Hammett 



According to this page: http://www.asterisk.org/doxygen/Config_sip.html

canreinvite=yes redirects just the RTP. I was 
under the impression that the entire SIP connection got redirected, therefore 
losing accounting ability. Could someone clarify this?

--Mike
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Zaptel issues

2006-01-12 Thread Mike Hammett 



On a side note: When poking around, I noticed 
in the zaptel Makefile that there is a section talking about ztdummy 
automatically being included on 2.6 kernels. Is this correct?

On to the main topic: Any ideas for 
troubleshooting this?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/zaptel 
startLoading zaptel framework: FATAL: Error inserting zaptel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module 
format 
[FAILED]Waiting for zap to come online...Error: missing 
/dev/zap!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] libpri-1.2.1]# modprobe 
ztdummyWARNING: Error inserting zaptel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module 
formatWARNING: Error inserting zaptel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/zaptel.ko): Invalid module 
formatFATAL: Error inserting ztdummy 
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-022stab050.1/extra/ztdummy.ko): Invalid module 
formatFATAL: Error running install command for ztdummy


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel make install error

2006-01-09 Thread Mike Hammett 

Do I need any of the kernel module stuff?  I'm running on a Virtual Server.



Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 12:00 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 44



--

Message: 16
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:22:23 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel make install error
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:50:53AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:

/bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: `if [ -n  ]; then  if [ -f  ]; then mv -f  .bak ; 
fi;  cat .bak | grep -v alias char-major-250 |  grep -v post-install 
torisa /sbin/ztcfg |  grep -v post-install wcfxsusb /sbin/ztcfg | 
grep -v alias wctdm |  grep -v post-install wctdm /sbin/ztcfg  ;  if 
! grep options torisa ; then  echo options torisa base=0xd  ; 
fi;  if ! grep alias char-major-196 ; then  echo alias char-major-196 
torisa  ;  fi;  for x in zaptel tor2 torisa wcusb wcfxo wctdm 
wctdm24xxp ztdynamic ztd-eth wct1xxp wct4xxp wcte11xp pciradio ztd-loc 
ztdummy ztdummy; do  if ! grep -q post-install $x ; then  if ! grep -q 
install $x  ; then  if [ $x != zaptel ] ; then  if [ -f 
zaptel.ko ]; then echo install $x /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install $x  
/sbin/ztcfg  ;  else echo post-install $x /sbin/ztcfg  ;  fi;  fi; 
fi;  fi;  done;  if ! grep ias wcfxs ; then  echo alias wcfxs wctdm 
  ;  fi;  if ! grep alias wct2xxp ; then  echo alias wct2x

xp wct4xxp  ;  fi;  fi'

make: *** [install] Error 2



After talking with Mike Hammett on #asterisk, it seems that the variable
MODCONF in his makefie managed to get undefined. He has kernel 2.6. He
uses some sort of virtual host settings and this is probably why none of
the standard locations apply.

Though I figure that he won't be easily able to load modules anyway.

Still, the makefile should not fail as badly there when MODCONF is not
detected. Not to mention the fact that the content of that file is
practically useless.

--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend



-- 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Zaptel make install error

2006-01-08 Thread Mike Hammett 



/bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected 
token `;'/bin/sh: -c: line 0: `if [ -n "" ]; then if [ -f ]; 
then mv -f .bak ; fi; cat .bak | grep -v "alias char-major-250" 
| grep -v "post-install torisa /sbin/ztcfg" | grep -v "post-install 
wcfxsusb /sbin/ztcfg" | grep -v "alias wctdm" | grep -v 
"post-install wctdm /sbin/ztcfg"  ; if ! grep "options torisa" ; 
then echo "options torisa base=0xd"  ; fi; if ! 
grep "alias char-major-196" ; then echo "alias char-major-196 torisa" 
 ; fi; for x in zaptel tor2 torisa wcusb wcfxo wctdm 
wctdm24xxp ztdynamic ztd-eth wct1xxp wct4xxp wcte11xp pciradio ztd-loc ztdummy 
ztdummy; do if ! grep -q "post-install $x" ; then if ! grep -q 
"install $x " ; then if [ "$x" != "zaptel" ] ; then if [ -f 
zaptel.ko ]; then echo "install $x /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install $x  
/sbin/ztcfg"  ; else echo "post-install $x /sbin/ztcfg"  
; fi; fi; fi; fi; done; if ! grep "ias 
wcfxs" ; then echo "alias wcfxs wctdm"  ; fi; if ! 
grep "alias wct2xxp" ; then echo "alias wct2xxp wct4xxp"  ; 
fi; fi'make: *** [install] Error 2


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 46

2006-01-08 Thread Mike Hammett 
okay, my needs have been met.  Thanks much.  Now, for the sake of Google, 
could someone respond with how Asterisk likes single vs. HT vs. dual core 
vs. dual cpu, etc.?


--Mike





--

Message: 15
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:57:12 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Processor Update?
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Mike Hammett wrote:


I've been Googling around for some time now (a few hours on dial-up).
I find all kinds of questions similar to mine, but either there is no
answer or the answer has nothing to do with the question.  Hopefully
this post isn't another one of those.

Does Asterisk favor FPU performance or clock speed?  (Meaning AMD or
Intel)


In this instance I think you're asking the wrong question.  Asterisk
will scale better on a processor that handles branching better, so the
AMDs with the shorter pipelines will help here a lot.


I see Asterisk can be compiled for x64 systems.  Does it run any
better\worse on x64 versus i386?


I have heard good reports from x64 systems.  Especially the AMD variety
that isn't drain bamaged.


Dual-core CPU performance isn't as good as dual CPU's, but is more
often than not a better deal as it's close, but a lot cheaper.
Dual-core vs. Dual CPU performance depends on the application.  How
does Asterisk respond?

Looking to build out a system capable of 100 concurrent calls (IP
pass-through, so in effect 200).  Looking at the dimensioning, I can
get some ideas, but few of them state the call quality.  I'm hoping to
be able to use a single CPU that is dual core as the price to go to a
dual CPU that is single core puts me at least 60% to a redundant server.


Asuming no AGI, a single p4 will handle 200 calls.


 More information about the setup
--
No cards of any kind (Tyan board with integrated video, NIC, SATA
nothing more needed)
some IAX2 trunks (ztdummy)
mainly SIP clients, but an increasing number of IAX2
mainly ulaw\alaw, if not solely (the transcoding chews CPU cycles
needlessly) 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Processor Update?

2006-01-07 Thread Mike Hammett 



I've been Googling around for some time now (a few 
hours on dial-up). I find all kinds of questions similar to mine, but 
either there is no answer or the answer has nothing to do with the 
question. Hopefully this post isn't another one of those.

Does Asterisk favor FPU performance or clock 
speed? (Meaning AMD or Intel)

I see Asterisk can be compiled for x64 
systems. Does it run any better\worse on x64 versus i386?

Dual-core CPU performance isn't as good as dual 
CPU's, but is more often than not a better deal as it's close, but a lot 
cheaper. Dual-core vs. Dual CPU performance depends on the 
application. How does Asterisk respond?

Looking to build out a system capable of 100 
concurrent calls (IP pass-through, so in effect 200). Looking at the 
dimensioning, I can get some ideas, but few of them state the call 
quality. I'm hoping to be able to use a single CPU that is dual core as 
the price to go to a dual CPU that is single core puts me at least 60% to a 
redundant server.

More information about the setup
--
No cards of any kind (Tyan board with integrated 
video, NIC, SATA nothing more needed)
some IAX2 trunks (ztdummy)
mainly SIP clients, but an increasing number of 
IAX2
mainly ulaw\alaw, if not solely (the transcoding 
chews CPU cycles needlessly)


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 109

2006-01-03 Thread Mike Hammett 
My SysAdmin tells me that this script is an Asterisk watchdog, not a SIP 
watchdog.  Surely someone else out there has had a provider that loses its 
connection from time to time and needs to reconnect?




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 7:05 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 109



--

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:22:11 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Watchdog
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

gate:/etc/asterisk/.sys# cat astdog.sh
#!/bin/sh
#
#
sleep 60
#
while [ 1 ] ; do
 BEZI=`ps auxx|egrep 'asterisk -p'|egrep -v 'grep'|wc -l`;
if [ $BEZI = 0 ]; then `killall -9 mpg123`; `asterisk -p`; fi
sleep 10
done
gate:/etc/asterisk/.sys#

---
turby


Is there anything I can set or any scripts you guys  have where
if it sees certain connections (my upstreams) are down, it attempts
to reconnect them say every minute or 5 minutes? If a provider
reloads  something, the connection some times drops and I have to do
a sip reload to  get it to come back.



Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing  Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com








--
S pozdravem,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 6

2006-01-02 Thread Mike Hammett 
Um, I'm not too sure.  :-)  I guess just some relevant information. 
Something pretty to show clients.  I'll ask my SysAdmin if he has any ideas 
of what he'd like to see.




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 


--

Message: 9
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:23:37 +0100
From: Matt Riddell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CrystalFontz LCD display
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes, we do development under Linux for this.  Was there some particular
support you were after?

--
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)



--


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] CrystalFontz LCD display

2006-01-01 Thread Mike Hammett 



I saw a brief discussion via Google about 
developing support for LCD displays, ones that you integrate into a drive bay or 
whatnot for server information output. Any development on this? I 
couldn't find much.

--Mike
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] SIP Watchdog

2005-12-18 Thread Mike Hammett 



Is there anything I can set or any scripts you guys 
have where if it sees certain connections (my upstreams) are down, it attempts 
to reconnect them say every minute or 5 minutes? If a provider reloads 
something, the connection some times drops and I have to do a "sip reload" to 
get it to come back.


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy echo?

2005-11-15 Thread Mike Hammett 

Will ask them to check the speaker volumes.

Not sure if you meant outside of my case, but in my case it's less than 15 
ms.




Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 9:07 AM
Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 16, Issue 104



Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Can't create iax channel (Dinesh Nair)
  2. Re: Can't create iax channel (Dinesh Nair)
  3. Re: How to check how many G729 codec licenseinstalled
 (Rich Adamson)
  4. IAXy echo? (Mike Hammett)
  5. RE: Snom clients deregistering (Michael Crown)
  6. Re: Snom clients deregistering (Richard Watson)
  7. RE: How to check how many G729 codec licenseinstalled
 (Rich Adamson)
  8. Re: IAXy echo? (Sergey Okhapkin)
  9. RE: Snom clients deregistering (The VoIP Connection)
 10. Re: IAXy echo? (Rich Adamson)
 11. Re: IAXy echo? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 12. RE: How to check how many G729 codec licenseinstalled (Sean Cook)
 13. Configure Asterisk to call from softPhone(SIP Channel) to
 Analog phone(Modem Channel) (ashok)
 14. RE: Sipura SPA-2002 Double Ring (Rich Adamson)
 15. OT: Aastra PT 390 Question. (Richard Reina)
 16. SIP signaling and canreinvite=yes (Damon Estep)
 17. Re: ISDN card required (Kristof Hardy)
 18. RE: ISDN card required (Lee Archer)
 19. Re: Snom clients deregistering (Richard Watson)
 20. Re: MYSQL issue in UPDATE.. (Tony Mountifield)
 21. Brooktrout MPAC 1200 card with Asterisk (Stephen Arulraj)
 22. Maximum Number of SIP Phones Supported By Asterisk (nr k)
 23. asterisk sample size adjustment (trixter aka Bret McDanel)
 24. Re: Can't make calls from Asterisk IAX to other IAX
 (chawki hammoud)
 25. connect to gateway h323 (Reli Loin)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:36:28 +0800
From: Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can't create iax channel
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed



On 11/10/05 15:02 Wayne Gemmell said the following:

When trying to call from this side to that side I get the following

-- Executing Dial(SIP/301-2d50,
IAX2/wayne:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/204) in new stack
Nov 10 08:37:21 WARNING[30785]: channel.c:455 ast_best_codec: Don't know 
any

of 0xf800 formats
Nov 10 08:37:21 WARNING[30785]: channel.c:455 ast_best_codec: Don't know 
any

of 0xf800 formats
Nov 10 08:37:21 WARNING[30785]: chan_iax2.c:7745 iax2_request: Unable to
create translator path for unknown to ulaw on IAX2/wayne-5


there's your problem right there. what codecs are the SIP peer set to use 
?

apparently, asterisk cant translate between ulaw and the unknown codec.

--
Regards,   /\_/\   All dogs go to heaven.
[EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/
+==oOO--(_)--OOo==+
| for a in past present future; do 
|
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do 
|
|   echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. 
|
| done; done 
|

+=+


--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:37:19 +0800
From: Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can't create iax channel
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed



On 11/10/05 17:36 Wayne Gemmell said the following:

On Thursday 10 November 2005 10:55, Jason Walker wrote:


The statement of zaptel being required is strange...I use IX trunking
exclusively for my servers. Two of them have no zaptel/Digium hardware 
and

the trunk calls are fine.


I don't know where I read it, apparently it is needed for timing or 
something,
could be in the old handbook or hitchikers guide to asterisk as I havn't 
got

far enough into the new handbook to comment.


IAX trunking works even without digium cards as long as the ztdummy pseudo
timer module is loaded.

--
Regards,   /\_/\   All dogs go to heaven.
[EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/
+==oOO--(_)--OOo

[Asterisk-Users] IAXy echo?

2005-11-14 Thread Mike Hammett 



I've got two customers on the same broadband 
provider. Same Asterisk box on my end. Same CLEC.

One has an IAXy and the other has an Asterisk box 
with an array of devices (Grandstream, Cisco, ATCOM, xten, etc.).

The people behind the Asterisk box have had no 
audio quality issues. The person with the IAXy often encounters an 
echo. The echo is only heard on the remote side and it only contains the 
remote caller's voice. This echo has been heard with the remote side being 
varying LECs. The echo is not always there. I'd almost say that the 
echo is not there more than it is.

Troubleshooting next step?

I haven't changed out the IAXy because I don't have 
any other ATAs to put in place.


Mike HammettIntelligent Computing 
Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

2005-04-01 Thread Mike Hammett 
Remco Barende wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Chris Hills wrote:
Olle E. Johansson wrote:
 * New source code structure - C# and .net
 
 Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the
 demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation.
 Therefore, the code was quickly moved to C# on the
 .net platform. This gives Asterisk a lot of new features,
 including being fully integrated with Microsoft Exchange
 and Microsoft Active Directory.
 With all the user data stored in Active Directory, we
 finally have the user under full control. Users can
 dial in to the PBX to change their Windows password. We
 can also implement single-sign-on based on DTMF from a
 cell phone or WiFi phone. says Kelvin Reming. The C#
 language gives us much more modern code. And I'm so
 happy to get rid of the stupid-looking arctic bird,
 an ugly animal that that couldn't even fly.

Shame this is just an april fool, I like the sound of this! Though it 
would be going head to head with Live Communications Server...

I guess you missed the real joke there (the stability and secureness 
of .net)

Ya, I mean do you really think an open source community is gonna 
acknowledge that MS can do anything right?  of course not.  THEY'RE THE 
DEVIL!
(note, I will not respond to anything posted in reply to this, so don't 
even try)

--

Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

begin:vcard
fn:Mike Hammett
n:Hammett;Mike
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] really small box

2005-04-01 Thread Mike Hammett 
Irakli Natsvlishvili wrote:
I don't know following has debated here or not, but is there in this 
world following stuff:

A small, physically small box, like cable/DSL router, which comes with:
1) Ethernet port, 2) Console port, 3) CompactFlash or USB port, 4) 
memory module port, like SODIMM

Box has built-in flash (256MB or 512MB) with or without Linux and 
feature to upgrade built-in RAM (128/256M) by adding memory module and 
storage via CompactFlash/USB.

Box should have inexpensive x86 CPU in 500Mhz-1Ghz range without 
active cooling and should not have VGA port. It also should not have 
price tag more then $200.

Anybody have seen stuff like this? Linksys NSLU2 and MacMini are not 
an option.

I.N.
Check out WRAP or Routerboards.
--

Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

begin:vcard
fn:Mike Hammett
n:Hammett;Mike
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Webmin

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
How do I install the asterisk module for webmin?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] IAXtalk

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
Can anyone speak about the quality (physical and performance) of the 
hard phones from iaxtalk.com

--

Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

begin:vcard
fn:Mike Hammett
n:Hammett;Mike
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
Rod Bacon wrote:
Maybe you should post this in the webmin forum.
- Original Message - From: Mike Hammett 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:25 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin


How do I install the asterisk module for webmin?

Webmin forum?
--

Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

begin:vcard
fn:Mike Hammett
n:Hammett;Mike
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
denon wrote:
First, I suppose, you'd have to write it ..
AFAIK, the webmin project was abandon a couple of years ago. I don't 
think it was ever even remotely near being completed.

-d
At 05:25 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote:
How do I install the asterisk module for webmin?

That sucks.  Perhaps someone ought to make note of that on the FTP server.
--

Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

begin:vcard
fn:Mike Hammett
n:Hammett;Mike
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Caller ID on voicemail messages

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
When someone calls into my toll-free number delivered via IAX, the 
caller's number shows up on my SIP phone.  However, when I receive an 
e-mail voicemail message, I get this message:

Just wanted to let you know you were just left a 0:01 long message 
(number 2)
in mailbox 200 from Toll-Free Call at ...

Why doesn't the Caller ID show up properly in the voicemail when it *does* 
show up on my phone?  I don't even know where to begin to look for this 
one!  :)

Thank you for any assistance you might be able to provide.
Tim Massey
 

How do you get it to say where its from in the first place?  ;-)
--

Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

begin:vcard
fn:Mike Hammett
n:Hammett;Mike
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

<    1   2