Re: [aur-general] Removal request for romextract

[beest]

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:20:29AM +, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected
> to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago. 
> 
> "[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link
> under "Package Actions" on the right hand side. This automatically
> sends a notification email to the current package maintainer and to the
> aur-requests mailing list for discussion. [snip]" -
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests

Sorry, that was pretty boneheaded; I do remember this becoming a thing and
haven't dealt with any AUR requests since AUR4.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for romextract

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:35:57 -0400, beest wrote:
>I'd like to request removal for romextract.

When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected
to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago. 

"[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link
under "Package Actions" on the right hand side. This automatically
sends a notification email to the current package maintainer and to the
aur-requests mailing list for discussion. [snip]" -
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Jeremy Audet]

Stefan,

The preferred method of submitting removal requests is now through the AUR
web interface. Search for the "File Request" link.

— Jeremy 'Ichimonji10' Audet

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] vim-lettuce

[Taylor Lookabaugh]

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Andy Weidenbaum  wrote:

> I added vim-colors-lettuce to replace vim-lettuce. The original vim-lettuce
> package is now obsolete.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-lettuce/
>
Andy,

Please use the web interface to file a deletion request (on the package's
page).

Very Respectfully,
Taylor Lookabaugh

Re: [aur-general] Removal request -- osc-build-archlinux

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Tuesday 17 June 2014 00:49:06 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote:
> osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than
> that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is
> included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway,
> obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date version of it.

Done, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] removal request: eos-git

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, June 15, 2014 19:40:58 ​ wrote:
> Please delete the unmaintained "eos-git" package. The source github page is
> down.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos-git/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request spyder2-hg

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Monday 09 June 2014 09:29:28 Willem wrote:
> Please remove spyder2-hg
> . It will become part of
> split package spyder-hg .

Done, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: linux-xps13-docs

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, June 08, 2014 19:21:35 Ross Williams wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to request the following package be removed:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps13-docs/
> 
> It was a failed attempted a little while ago to upload my patched kernel to
> the AUR and I have since read up on the AUR and submitted the package using
> linux-ck as a guide.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 12:20:02 李胜明 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please remove the following pkgbuilds:
> 
> - 115backup-gtk2 [1];
> - 115backup-gtk3 [2];
> - airweibo [3];
> - weiboair [4];
> - xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans [5];
> 
> I am the submitter of the 5 packages. The upstream of [1] [2] has renamed
> them to 115wangpan. Package [3] and [4] are the same. Package [5] is
> contained by xbmc-addons-chinese-svn
> .
> 
>  Also, It seems no one wants to maintain or use all of them.
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk2/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk3/
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/airweibo/
> [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weiboair/
> [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans/

All removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, June 01, 2014 15:22:56 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote:
> Hi,
> The package [1] is out-of-date.
> Please remove [1].
> 
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1]

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, June 01, 2014 20:21:54 Charles Bos wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I think the following package ought to be removed:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/
> 
> The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the
> upstream url nor the source link work.
> 
> The following website lists 0.8.5 as the latest release:
> http://freecode.com/projects/hackedbox
> 
> Version 0.8.5 is the same version that is in the AUR and that would
> indicate that upstream hasn't released a new version since January 2007 so
> the project would appear to be stone dead.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] removal request

[Bartłomiej Piotrowski]

On Mon, 26 May 2014 13:29:32 -0600
Alexej Magura  wrote:
> This is more of "should this be removed; if so, please remove
> it"-request.
> 
> package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001
> package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
> 
> I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said
> package without owning an actual playstation console, but still...
> isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your
> car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your
> business?  Peeps are gonna steal!
> 
> Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense
> that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah.

Deleted, thanks.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] removal request

[Никола Вукосављевић]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 26.5.2014 21:47, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is 
> unzip 1 file...
How does the number of files in a package relate to its usefulness?
It's there for convenience, as are many other packages. Take for
example packages that change only one compile flag. Guess we should
remove those.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=fbt0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] removal request

[Никола Вукосављевић]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 26.5.2014 21:29, Alexej Magura wrote:
> This is more of "should this be removed; if so, please remove
> it"-request.
> 
> package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
> 
> I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use
> said package without owning an actual playstation console, but
> still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to
> steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going
> about your business?  Peeps are gonna steal!
> 
> Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the
> sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah.
> 
The maintainer here.
If Arch Linux even so as *might* suffer from legal consequences
because of it, by all means remove it immediately.
If not, I don't see the harm in it being there.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwRAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnlWsP/2SRx4HGTyenbUy4q4sbfzfT
Z6YPXiH9kESjB30SkfxCzVzd3q3tGKlL4ipWsHLpVfyhl5oLmd9d2Os9ejKm7eHK
UoPGkWs4rRzJrmPyeE2D1BW4Ge1EK5f7uqE/qPVtkygKLtHbolIZFLQ6FANhLuC1
WF1VCmHzcM9uAMq080/eQ20JAKnSXgpMKhZk/4topjlMvzr+iPoeKYijLZvUt0uD
Ynff6sLdQRa/eMjbLFk7pU2+xPeIO+iHA694i7XB8E1xGpR6YeK61YmdHyXVlnkV
ukfpL32MSt8X8kD5iru67nRNCxPxHrwj+l3N5IFgr2tpTSL8B1WAHwzpupD4yuxq
YMSsjeq5KRBoMRfXO5FDJTqoxa0i5aT9sI2KLSQDPI4v7bFNoU9qMsZQ7eW2tRJ/
OaizfCdSvoYUkIpjE6YyixqeK/mIbZomSDF2v0o07WcQdSTTPTAAv4UyO0gw2OGG
1iVR3lFLnIZrQ7jZp90AMFL4picpO6GyAbJXBootCjlc/EcQ5jyhymb3y8LPYvtV
U7/0R9iKCQBXGjblJdI/3xCaprIW1IQtfCwbddfk9U0m4dmDQOaXoPebnzUcn3Sh
UvddldUqJf6lvuvebHVY4g82WHAGx8uK6AvL2N6fjWsSBwX69z04uRImdwUaKmUz
qSZLjztTS8fBQRZJvOOS
=33qa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] removal request

[Steven Honeyman]

Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is
unzip 1 file...

That's worse than firefox addon packages or desktop wallpapers.

On 26 May 2014 20:29, Alexej Magura  wrote:
> This is more of "should this be removed; if so, please remove it"-request.
>
> package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001
> package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
>
> I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said
> package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't
> this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but
> then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business?  Peeps are
> gonna steal!
>
> Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that
> the package *is very* useful, but... yeah.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo wrote:

> Hi
>
> Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]?
> It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2].
>
> Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the
> glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release.
>
> Thank you
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade-gtk2/
>
> --
> Nuno Araujo 
> http://www.russo79.com
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] mybb-polish

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:31:04 Stefan Tatschner wrote:
> Please remove the outdated mybb-polish [1] package. I have adopted and
> updated the mybb AUR package. Language packs can be easily added like I
> did here [2]. If somebody likes I can create a polish language pack
> ('mybb-lang-pl') as well.
> 
> Stefan
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-polish/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-lang-ger/

Removed [1], thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:

> Hi TUs,
>
> Please remove my package "talesofmajeyal" [1]. It is a duplicate of
> tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> WorMzy
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/
>

Removed.

Thx,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 14:09:06 Antonio Rojas wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/
> 
> Merged in kio-extras

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for cantata-qt

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, May 11, 2014 02:48:48 Spyros Stathopoulos wrote:
> The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so
> the package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR.

Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/
>
> This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra].
>

Done, thx

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status

[David Phillips]

Ahh okay, thanks for clarifying that for me

On 10/05/2014, Felix Yan  wrote:
> On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote:
>> On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
>> aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
>> no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
>> still using them instead of systemd?
>
> They're okay to me as long as they are maintained. The package in the
> original
> request (arc-status) was an orphan and didn't get an update for more than 4
>
> years, and that's why I think its removal is a good idea.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Yan


-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote:
> On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
> aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
> no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
> still using them instead of systemd?

They're okay to me as long as they are maintained. The package in the original 
request (arc-status) was an orphan and didn't get an update for more than 4 
years, and that's why I think its removal is a good idea.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status

[David Phillips]

On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
still using them instead of systemd?

On 09/05/2014, Felix Yan  wrote:
> On Thursday, May 08, 2014 15:46:28 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in
>> 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts.
>>
>> I'd suggest its removal.
>
>> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/
>
> Removed.
>
>> Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old
>> initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its
>> removal here, or would this be too cumbersome?
>
> It's fine, and thanks for helping us cleaning AUR :)
>
> Regards,
> Felix Yan


-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status

[Felix Yan]

On Thursday, May 08, 2014 15:46:28 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in
> 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts.
> 
> I'd suggest its removal.

> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/

Removed.

> Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old
> initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its
> removal here, or would this be too cumbersome?

It's fine, and thanks for helping us cleaning AUR :)

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: glm-0.9.4, glm094

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 15:27:00 Levente Polyak wrote:
> Please remove glm-0.9.4 [1] and glm094 [2] as both are orphan and
> unneeded/obsolete.
> 
> small explanation:
> vertoe (the submitter) meant to use it as a dependency for some other
> package he is working on. I contacted him and discussed the problems
> involved in having a static version of glm as dependency. After my
> recommendations he issued the problem upstream (where a patch is already
> available) which made the static glm versions obsolete (so he disowned
> both now).
> 
> cheers
> Levente
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm-0.9.4/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm094/

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kf5umbrella-git

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, April 28, 2014 00:24:56 A Rojas wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kf5umbrella-git/
> 
> Merged upstream in extra-cmake-modules

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kde-runtime-git

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, April 26, 2014 14:47:48 A Rojas wrote:
>  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-> runtime-git
> 
> kde-runtime is dead, long live kde-runtime

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] netdiscover-patched

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Tuesday 22 April 2014 20:00:57 Roel Blaauwgeers wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netdiscover-patched/ should
> be
> removed as it is a duplicate of 'netdiscover'.

The package has been removed, thank you =)
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, April 21, 2014 14:49:17 Charles Bos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can the following package be deleted please:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnautilus-extension-ubuntu/
> 
> I originally uploaded it because the AUR doesn't yet support split
> packages but it doesn't really make sense to compile the whole of
> nautilus twice and then throw most of it away so I've made sure that
> libnautilus-extension-ubuntu is provided in this package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nautilus-ubuntu/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of pywapi

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, April 13, 2014 16:17:18 willemw wrote:
> Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pywapi/ and please move
> the votes to the renamed package
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pywapi/.

Merged, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] python2-pybitcointools

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:23 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.

Done. Please provide links in the next time.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kde4support-git

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 20:58:12 A Rojas wrote:
> Replaced with kdelibs4support-git
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde4support-git/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:25:19 James Bulmer wrote:
> Could
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/
> 
> be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/
> 
> Thanks

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:02:14 James Bulmer wrote:
> I propose that
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/
> 
> should be deleted as
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/
> 
> replaces it
> 
> and that
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/
> 
> should be deleted as
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging/
> 
> replaces it
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- James

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] - linux-sun7i and sunxi-tools

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Saturday 05 April 2014 18:10:02 sehraf wrote:
> please remove linux-sun7i [1] and sunxi-tools [2] because:
> - both are outdated and orphaned
> - linux-sun7i is provided by Arch Linux ARM [3]
> - sunxi-tools is a duplication of sunxi-tools-git [4]

I've removed linux-sun7i and have merged  sunxi-tools into *-git (because it 
had several votes).
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] Please remove tntdb-svn from AUR

[Evangelos Foutras]

On 5 April 2014 15:22, Jonas Platte  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see
> [2])
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas Platte
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/
> [2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html

Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - redirfs package cleanup

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, April 05, 2014 00:53:11 WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> Hi TUs,
> 
> Please could you remove the following packages:
> 
> redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since
> 2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a
> non-existent redirfs-modules package.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> WorMzy
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-lib/

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Connor Behan]

On 03/04/14 12:46 PM, Ivaylo Kuzev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2].
> Please remove [1].
>
> [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1]
> [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2]
> --
> Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
Merged [1] into [2], thanks!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] stm32flash-svn

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 00:53:37 Stephen Zhang wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
> 
> I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/
> 
> The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new
> packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's
> unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of i3-py-git

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:18:19 willemw wrote:
> Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and
> python2-i3-git.

Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] sublime-text-3

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Thursday 27 March 2014 12:15:10 Janne Haapsaari wrote:
> The package sublime-text-3 [1] is a duplicate of sublime-text-dev [2]
> package. Please remove the former.

The package has only one vote, so I've removed it.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos  wrote:

> Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/compiz-pure/
>
> It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The
> package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several
> versions out of date and doesn't build successfully.
>
> Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides
> exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/
>

Merged into the latter, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My bad, package "hubicfuse" has to be removed (correct package is
> "hubicfuse-git").  Feel free to test the package, but I think I added
> all deps
>
>
Removed, please include a link to the package next time.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics wrote:

> The following Packages should be removed:
>
> 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/
> 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/
> 3: libebur128-nu774-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/
>
> 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages
> build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by:
>
> loudness-scanner-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/
>

All merged into loudness-scanner-git, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Friday, March 21, 2014 20:04:22 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2].
> Please remove [1].
> 
> [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex--git/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex-git/
> 
> Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] linux-selinux

[Sébastien Luttringer]

On 19/03/2014 01:11, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> Please remove linux-selinux:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/
> 
> Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel.
> 
> Thanks
> 
Done.

-- 
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42
GPG: 0x2072D77A



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Jonathan Steel]

On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 18:37, Jonathan Steel wrote:
> On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote:
> > 
> > >>I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
> > >>still exists. ;)
> > 
> > >Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.
> > 
> > There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to
> > removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks.
> 
> The official package (deb) name is lwks, and "lightworks" is in the
> description. I see no reason to change it.

On second thoughts, maybe it should be listed as lightworks, but the
maintainer should upload it under the new name and then request a merge
here. Now lightworks is gone, he is able to.

-- 
Jonathan Steel


pgpHKygqNLmQn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Jonathan Steel]

On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote:
> 
> >>I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
> >>still exists. ;)
> 
> >Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.
> 
> There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to
> removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks.

The official package (deb) name is lwks, and "lightworks" is in the
description. I see no reason to change it.

-- 
Jonathan Steel


pgp3BfDUcwMF6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Nowaker]

I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)



Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.


There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move 
was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks.


--
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Jonathan Steel]

On Fri 14 Mar 2014 at 17:36, Pyro Devil wrote:
> Hi again!
> 
> I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
> still exists. ;)

Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.

> Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
> > request removal because of duplication.
> > 
> > When I created the package I didn't see that:
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Pyro Devil

-- 
Jonathan Steel


pgpwUmmdC_dBd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request]

[Xyne]

On 2014-03-16 10:46 +0100
Berno Strik wrote:

>Please remove[1]
>
>This is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcpj715w-cups/
>
>
>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-brother-dcpj715w-cups
>
>

done, thanks

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] brother-hl3170cdw-{cupswrapper, lpr}

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, March 15, 2014 14:04:00 Berno Strik wrote:
> Please remove[1] and [2].
> 
> They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw/
> 
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-cupswrapper
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-lpr

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] pencil-svn

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, March 15, 2014 21:56:25 N30N wrote:
> Request removal of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pencil-svn/
> 
> This project is dead and development continues under the pencil2D fork
> (which is now also available in the AUR), making this package redundant.
> 
> Thanks and best regards,
> N30N.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request]

[Berno Strik]

Please ignore this one.
I made a mistake

On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:52:26 +0100
Berno Strik  wrote:

> Please remove[1] and [2].
> 
> They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/
> 
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-lpr 
> 


-- 
Berno Strik 

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Pyro Devil]

Hi again!

I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)

Cheers,
Pyro Devil


Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil:
> Hi!
> 
> I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
> request removal because of duplication.
> 
> When I created the package I didn't see that:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Pyro Devil
> 

Re: [aur-general] Removal request python2-pycrypto

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:56:55 Levente Polyak wrote:
>  Hey, please remove python2-pycrypto [1] as it is an orphaned duplicate
>  of python2-crypto [2].
>  Seems it was created by accident (as pointed out in the comments)
> 
> 
>  [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycrypto/
>  [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/python2-crypto/
> 
>  cheers
>  Levente

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: perl-webservice-mtgox

[Felix Yan]

On Saturday, March 08, 2014 20:22:42 Anton Leontiev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please delete my package perl-webservice-mtgox [1]. It is no longer
> works and MtGox was closed.
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-webservice-mtgox/
> 
> With the best wishes,

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete
> since
> Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM
> repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston
>

Deleted, thx.
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] electrum-entropy

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Friday 28 February 2014 18:25:03 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> I no longer wish to maintain this
> package

The package has several votes and it isn't broken. So I don't think that 
removal of tha package is needed. And I hope someone will adopt it in the 
future.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] bitcoin-daemon-electrum

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Friday 28 February 2014 21:12:57 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> "This package
> has been made
> obsolete by the new version of electrum-server-git."

Removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] nodejs-yapp.js

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:53:05 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> Upstream source is no longer available. Please remove this
> package
> .
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andy

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[carstene1ns]

Am 24.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
> Status?
> There still are two packages:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks

lwks by stjhimy:
+ automatic download of source
+ older
+ votes
- name
- maintainers "today" is two weeks so far

lightworks by PyroDevil:
+ name
- needs manual download of source

My suggestion is merging lwks -> lightworks, add 'lwks' to description
(so it can be found by that name) and add DLAGENTS overwrite to new package.

best regards,
carstene1ns



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, February 24, 2014 18:01:53 Lucy hi wrote:
> pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/
> I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this
> package is no longer useful.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:
>> Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package name
> proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue stating that
> it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns.
>
> Excellent point. The principle of least surprise would dictate that
> packages have obvious names light lightworks or powerdns.

Status?
There still are two packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks

Re: [aur-general] removal request: girlfriend

[mail]

Can I have it?

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: minetestpp

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 15:01:41 Arch Norrepli wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minetestpp/
> 
> I created the minetestpp package, but orphaned it after development was
> given up. Most features of minetestpp have been merged into the current
> minetest or are availabe through mods. As the repository of minetestpp has
> been deleted, I request the removal of the package.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for slic3r-xs-git

[Felix Yan]

On Friday, February 14, 2014 22:40:36 Swift Geek wrote:
> Please remove slic3r-xs-git as it is not needed anymore.
> I have managed to successfully merge it with slic3r-git PKGBUILD.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slic3r-xs-git

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - splashtop

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Mark Weiman wrote:

> It seems that the package "splashtop" was replaced by the
> "splashtop-client" and "splashtop-streamer" packages.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/splashtop/
>
> Mark
>

Merged into splashtop-streamer. Thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - hddb

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 21:32:40 Louis-Guillaume Gagnon wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> Please delete AUR package 'hddb' - upstream is gone.
> 
> glg

Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request mkzipbomb

[Sébastien Luttringer]

On 09/02/2014 00:06, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> Please remove the package mkzipbomb [1]. The package is empty and the
> former maintainer has asked it to be removed in the comments of the package.
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mkzipbomb/
> 
> Thanks
> 
Done. Thanks.

-- 
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42
GPG: 0x2072D77A



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal request firefox-extention-kwallet-svn

[Laurent Carlier]

Le vendredi 7 février 2014, 22:09:26 Joris Steyn a écrit :
> I submitted a package with a typo in the name. I submitted it again with
> the correct name.
> 
> Could you remove:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-extention-kwallet-svn
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Joris.

Done

-- 
Laurent Carlier
ArchLinux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - bitcoind

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Wednesday 05 February 2014 23:40:14 WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> Please remove bitcoind [1], it is provided by community/bitcoin-daemon.

Done, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Martin Wimpress]

Hi,

On 04/02/14 16:22, Daniel Landau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The package [1] is outdated, an orphan and the features are provided by
> [2]. Please remove [1].
> 
> Daniel Landau
> 
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-heal-selection
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/

Removed as requested.

-- 
Regards, Martin.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Jeremy Audet]

> Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package name
proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue stating that
it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns.

Excellent point. The principle of least surprise would dictate that
packages have obvious names light lightworks or powerdns.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Sam Stuewe]

On 2014-02-03 16:11, Nowaker wrote:

Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package
name proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue
stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss
powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the
tarball is named upstream) to powerdns.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231
That's valid. I don't honestly mind. Though the lwks package in the ALUR 
really needs to be updated to fetch the source from upstream (which it 
currently doesn't do).


--
All the best,
Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Nowaker]

Actually, though the project name is "lightworks", the packages distributed upstream are all named 
"lwks". I feel like, keeping in line with upstream's naming convention, it makes sense to keep the 
name "lwks".



The "lwks" package includes the word "Lightworks" in the description, which
means it can be found easily. Also, the "lwks" package has 21 votes to
"lightworks" 0.


Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package 
name proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue 
stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss 
powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the 
tarball is named upstream) to powerdns. 
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231


--
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:
> The "lwks" package includes the word "Lightworks" in the description, which
> means it can be found easily.

You're right, even though I prefer 'lightworks' :-)


> Also, the "lwks" package has 21 votes to "lightworks" 0.

'lightworks' has been uploaded to AUR only about 12 hours ago. 'lwks'
has been submitted a year ago.

>
> That said, I have no personal experience with lightworks or how other
> distributions treat the package, so I have no solid opinion on the matter.
>
> --Jeremy

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Jeremy Audet]

The "lwks" package includes the word "Lightworks" in the description, which
means it can be found easily. Also, the "lwks" package has 21 votes to
"lightworks" 0.

That said, I have no personal experience with lightworks or how other
distributions treat the package, so I have no solid opinion on the matter.

--Jeremy

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Sam Stuewe]

On 2014-02-03 07:51, Nowaker wrote:

I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
request removal because of duplication.

Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to
remove lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks.
Actually, though the project name is "lightworks", the packages 
distributed upstream are all named "lwks". I feel like, keeping in line 
with upstream's naming convention, it makes sense to keep the name 
"lwks".


--
All the best,
Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nowaker  wrote:
>> I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
>> request removal because of duplication.
>>
>> When I created the package I didn't see that:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists.
>
>
> Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to remove
> lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Damian Nowak
> StratusHost
> www.AtlasHost.eu

Merge lwks into lightworks and transfer maintainership to stjhimy, the
current lwks maintainer?

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Nowaker]

I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
request removal because of duplication.

When I created the package I didn't see that:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists.


Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to 
remove lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks.


--
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: udis86-bin

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:31 AM, <483...@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udis86-bin/
>
> This orphan package is obsoleted by udis86 and udis86-git. It hasn't been
> updated since 2011. Please consider deleting it.
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: octave-ident

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Thursday 30 January 2014 20:23:40 Clemens Buchacher wrote:
> I am not the maintainer of the octave-ident package [1]. But the
> maintainer notes in the comments that it has been removed and merged
> into the control package.
> 
> I confirm that it has been removed upstream [2]. Please remove.

Both packages had been removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fail2ban-systemd-journal-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:46 AM, William J. Bowman
wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-systemd-journal-git/ has been
> superseded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-0.9dev/
>
> --
> William J. Bowman
>
> Northeastern University
> College of Computer and Information Science
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] removal request: exfat

[Daniel Micay]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
 wrote:
> exfat package was a first package for exfat kernel module, based on opened
> by samsung code. Currently it is outdated and not compatible with latest
> kernels. exfat-git is a replacement package, which is being supported and
> updated. So can you please remove
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat/
> package?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex

If it's not a dead project and they are not done making stable
releases, the package might as well remain there. There's no point in
erasing the comments and votes whenever a package is temporarily
broken.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: ds4drv-hidraw-git

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:24:57 Lauri Niskanen wrote:
> ds4drv-hidraw-git was a package for an experimental feature of ds4drv.
> That feature is now merged to the master branch and is available with
> ds4drv-git.
> 
> ds4drv-hidraw-git should be removed from AUR.

Ds4drv-hidraw-git had been removed. Please provide links in the next time.

-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: dktools-gui

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ansgar Taflinski  wrote:

> Hallo,
>
> please remove the package dktools-gui. GUI components for dktools are
> included in the dktools package since version 3.0, so the old
> dktools-gui package is obsolete. I am the owner of the package.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dktools-gui
>
> Thanks,
> Ansgar
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: mixcloud-dl

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:01:52 Jordi De Groof wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please remove mixcloud-dl [1], the program is no longer functioning.
> I'm the maintainer.
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mixcloud-dl/
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi De Groof

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of linux-elantech-trackpoint

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Saturday 11 January 2014 17:26:27 Faule Socke wrote:
> Reason: My other package elantech-tp-dkms does the same but using dkms
> instead of patching the kernel which should be much more useful.
> 
> Url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-elantech-trackpoint/
> 
> Regards

Removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of ttf-font-ionicons-space

[Felix Yan]

On Friday, January 10, 2014 14:44:43 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Reason: my other package ttf-font-icons do the same and more.
> 
> URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-font-ionicons-space/
> 
> Regards
> --
> Carlos

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pathvisio-devel, toshiba-pmfix-hg

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, January 05, 2014 00:28:33 Michael Schubert wrote:
> Dear TUs,
> 
> Please remove:
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pathvisio-devel/
> reason: 3.x is now stable
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toshiba-pmfix-hg/
> reason: fixes included in mainline kernel
> 
> I am the maintainer of both packages.
> 
> Thank you
> Michael

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages

[Timothée Ravier]

On 02/01/2014 22:54, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote:
>>
>> Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-findutils/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-openssh/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pam/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pambase/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-psmisc/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-setools/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-shadow/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-sudo/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-systemd/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-checkpolicy/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libselinux/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsemanage/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsepol/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-policycoreutils/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-sepolgen/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-util-linux/
>>
> 
> I merged them with the package you had indicated in the last comment.
> 
> Happy new year.

Thanks! Merging is great!

-- 
Timothée Ravier

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages

[Sébastien Luttringer]

On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> 
> Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-findutils/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-openssh/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pam/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pambase/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-psmisc/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-setools/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-shadow/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-sudo/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-systemd/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-checkpolicy/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libselinux/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsemanage/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsepol/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-policycoreutils/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-sepolgen/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-util-linux/
> 

I merged them with the package you had indicated in the last comment.

Happy new year.

-- 
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://seblu.net
GPG: 0x2072D77A



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: hawaii-fluid-git and hawaii-greenisland-git

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 12:58:40 Pier Luigi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could you please remove the following packages:
> 
>   https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-git/
>   https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-greenisland-git/
> 
> They were respectively renamed to `fluid-git' and `greenisland-git'.
> 
> Cheers.

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - h2status

[Carlos Pita]

Thank you and sorry, I'm a first-timer. Regards, Carlos.

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Felix Yan  wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:45:33 Carlos Pita wrote:
>> Hi, could you remove the h2status package? It's a tiny development of
>> mine that is better distributed under h2status-git. It was quietly
>> announced yesterday and the expected user base is infinitesimal so
>> probably there is no one but me using the package. Regards, Carlos.
>
> Removed. Please provide a link to package next time, thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Yan

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - h2status

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:45:33 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Hi, could you remove the h2status package? It's a tiny development of
> mine that is better distributed under h2status-git. It was quietly
> announced yesterday and the expected user base is infinitesimal so
> probably there is no one but me using the package. Regards, Carlos.

Removed. Please provide a link to package next time, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Felix Yan]

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 19:45:16 Slavi Pantaleev wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> This is about my libcvp11 package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcvp11/
> 
> The binary blob source files now 404 and are nowhere to be found online.
> 
> I no longer have a use for this package, as opensc from [community] seems
> to provide a working free-software alternative.
> 
> I still have a local copy of the zip file, but:
>  - binaries in a "source" package are not encouraged
>  - everything around this driver seems shady
>  - the package has 0 votes, so likely no one else has/had a need for it
>  - I'd rather not host such a blob on a server of mine for no good reason
> (the free-software driver works for me)
> 
> Based on all that, I think this should be deleted.
> 
> Regards

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Wednesday 18 December 2013 22:15:08 Daniel Murphy wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I managed the package linux-xps15z several months back. This package added
> a trackpad driver needed for certain laptops. The driver was merged into
> the 3.9 series kernel and has been working fine since; therefore the AUR
> package will no longer be maintained and can be deleted if you want.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps15z/

Removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: owl-git

[Xyne]

On 2013-12-16 18:10 +0100
Bastien Dejean wrote:

>Please remove the following package:
>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owl-git/
>
>It was renamed to `owlman-git`.
>
>Greetings,
>-- 
> b.d
>(| |)
> ^ ^


rotated for science (merged in layman's terms)