Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Sure, will so Angelthx once again... 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > Yes > > vccie2010 take a look to Qos SRND Campus Qos Design Chaper > 3750 > subchapter > > hth > > -- > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:29:49 +1000 > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch > From: rhender...@gmail.com > To: vccie2...@gmail.com > > CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > Priority-queue out sets port 1 on the egress to be the priority queue. Only > queue 1 can be an egress priority queue on the 3750. > > Roger > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:27 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > > Thx for your kind clarification, now if I have to also enable PQ will I > have to enable "priority-queue out" on the interface but in that case Q1 > will still be the PQ or there will be one more Q assigned but I think the > port only has 4 egress Qs ? > > > 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > > Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the > switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example > > -- > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch > From: vccie2...@gmail.com > To: rhender...@gmail.com > CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > > Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... > > **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this > case why we need to have 1 on share ? > > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 > is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 > gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 > > > *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of > share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson wrote: > > Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which > replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. > > Roger > > 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > > From QoS Entreprise 3.3 > > Campus QoS Design chapter: > > > > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 > is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 > gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% > shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 > share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining > > hth > > -- > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 > From: vccie2...@gmail.com > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch > > > little correction .pls... > > > If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > > If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that > value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? > > > > > > -- > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > -- > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > > > > > -- > Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up > now. <https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Yes vccie2010 take a look to Qos SRND Campus Qos Design Chaper > 3750 subchapter hth Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:29:49 +1000 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch From: rhender...@gmail.com To: vccie2...@gmail.com CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Priority-queue out sets port 1 on the egress to be the priority queue. Only queue 1 can be an egress priority queue on the 3750. Roger On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:27 PM, vccie2010 wrote: Thx for your kind clarification, now if I have to also enable PQ will I have to enable "priority-queue out" on the interface but in that case Q1 will still be the PQ or there will be one more Q assigned but I think the port only has 4 egress Qs ? 2010/4/29 Angel Perez Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch From: vccie2...@gmail.com To: rhender...@gmail.com CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this case why we need to have 1 on share ? CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson wrote: Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. Roger 2010/4/29 Angel Perez >From QoS Entreprise 3.3 Campus QoS Design chapter: CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining hth Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 From: vccie2...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch little correction .pls... If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. _ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Perfect, so in a given scenario wher I have to assign particular percent of BW and PQ to be Q1 the solution discussed here should work. Let me lab it and update. thx Angel and Roger On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Roger Henderson wrote: > Priority-queue out sets port 1 on the egress to be the priority queue. Only > queue 1 can be an egress priority queue on the 3750. > > Roger > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:27 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > >> Thx for your kind clarification, now if I have to also enable PQ will I >> have to enable "priority-queue out" on the interface but in that case Q1 >> will still be the PQ or there will be one more Q assigned but I think the >> port only has 4 egress Qs ? >> >> >> 2010/4/29 Angel Perez >> >>> Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the >>> switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example >>> >>> -- >>> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 >>> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >>> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >>> To: rhender...@gmail.com >>> CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> >>> >>> Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... >>> >>> **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this >>> case why we need to have 1 on share ? >>> >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 >>> is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >>> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 >>> >>> >>> *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of >>> share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson >>> wrote: >>> >>> Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which >>> replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. >>> >>> Roger >>> >>> 2010/4/29 Angel Perez >>> >>> From QoS Entreprise 3.3 >>> >>> Campus QoS Design chapter: >>> >>> >>> >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! >>> Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >>> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% >>> shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 >>> share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining >>> >>> hth >>> >>> -- >>> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 >>> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >>> >>> >>> little correction .pls... >>> >>> >>> If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% >>> >>> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >>> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: >>> >>> If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% >>> >>> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >>> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >>> >>> As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that >>> value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >>> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >>> >>> ___ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >>> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >>> >> >> > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Priority-queue out sets port 1 on the egress to be the priority queue. Only queue 1 can be an egress priority queue on the 3750. Roger On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:27 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > Thx for your kind clarification, now if I have to also enable PQ will I > have to enable "priority-queue out" on the interface but in that case Q1 > will still be the PQ or there will be one more Q assigned but I think the > port only has 4 egress Qs ? > > > 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > >> Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the >> switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example >> >> ---------- >> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >> To: rhender...@gmail.com >> CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> >> >> Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... >> >> **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this >> case why we need to have 1 on share ? >> >> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 >> is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 >> >> >> *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of >> share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? >> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson >> wrote: >> >> Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which >> replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. >> >> Roger >> >> 2010/4/29 Angel Perez >> >> From QoS Entreprise 3.3 >> >> Campus QoS Design chapter: >> >> >> >> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 >> is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% >> shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 >> share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining >> >> hth >> >> -- >> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 >> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >> >> >> little correction .pls... >> >> >> If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% >> >> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: >> >> If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% >> >> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >> >> As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that >> value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >> >> ___ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >> > > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Thx for your kind clarification, now if I have to also enable PQ will I have to enable "priority-queue out" on the interface but in that case Q1 will still be the PQ or there will be one more Q assigned but I think the port only has 4 egress Qs ? 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the > switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example > > -- > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch > From: vccie2...@gmail.com > To: rhender...@gmail.com > CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > > Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... > > **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this > case why we need to have 1 on share ? > > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 > is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 > gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 > > > *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of > share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson wrote: > > Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which > replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. > > Roger > > 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > > From QoS Entreprise 3.3 > > Campus QoS Design chapter: > > > > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 > is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 > gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% > shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 > share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining > > hth > > -- > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 > From: vccie2...@gmail.com > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch > > > little correction .pls... > > > If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > > If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that > value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? > > > > > > -- > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > -- > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch From: vccie2...@gmail.com To: rhender...@gmail.com CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this case why we need to have 1 on share ? CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson wrote: Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. Roger 2010/4/29 Angel Perez >From QoS Entreprise 3.3 Campus QoS Design chapter: CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining hth Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 From: vccie2...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch little correction .pls... If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... **you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this case why we need to have 1 on share ? CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 *Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson wrote: > Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which > replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. > > Roger > > 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > >> From QoS Entreprise 3.3 >> >> Campus QoS Design chapter: >> >> >> >> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 >> is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% >> shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 >> share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining >> >> hth >> >> ---------- >> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 >> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >> >> >> little correction .pls... >> >> >> If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% >> >> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: >> >> If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% >> >> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >> >> As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that >> value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >> >> ___ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. Roger 2010/4/29 Angel Perez > From QoS Entreprise 3.3 > > Campus QoS Design chapter: > > > > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 > is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW > CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 > gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% > shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 > share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining > > hth > > -- > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 > From: vccie2...@gmail.com > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch > > > little correction .pls... > > > If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > > If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that > value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? > > > > > > -- > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
You're never going to get more than 100% bandwidth without upgrading your link. :) What you've got here is 3% (1/33 as shaped uses inverse logic), 32.3, 32.3, 32.3 as the "0" queues all share the remaining BW equally. That's all true if my memory serves me correctly, anyhow. Roger On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > little correction .pls... > > > If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > >> If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% >> >> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >> >> As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that >> value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? >> >> >> > > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
>From QoS Entreprise 3.3 Campus QoS Design chapter: CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 !Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining hth Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 From: vccie2...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch little correction .pls... If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
little correction .pls... If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 wrote: > If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% > > srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 > srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 > > As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that > value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? > > > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch
If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
