Re: Passed CCNAamp;CCNP in a month [7:27142]
Hello, my name is Judy White and one of my close friends gave me some very good study material. The material was so good that I passed my CCNA and CCNP in a month. That's 5 test in one month with minimum study time. The questions and answers that my friend gave me to study was identical to the ones on the actual test. If you are interested in obtaining a copy of this material contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seems like a shame to waste a month like that... or do you think that you actually learned something? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27191t=27142 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT - List of dirty words [7:26380]
This is totally off-topic, and I realize it's lazy to ask help so quickly, but this seems like an interesting quest. It would be very interesting if posted to the proper group. This, sadly, is not such a group. Before I corrupt my pure and uncommonly sin-free soul by spending hours typing every foul thing I can think of, does anybody know of a webpage that I can cut and paste something, or perhaps e-mail me off-line what you've accumulated in the past? http://www.google.com has lots of links. Did you try there? Also, keep in mind that diryt words are not simply what we would consider to be foul language. Dirty words define words that your company would not want passing through your content scanner, and are even in this context, not set in stone. Example, I may not want mail with the word resume in the subject leaving my network, but have no objections to such mail coming in. I might object to web content with the words sex involved incoming and outgoing, and so on. To limit your request to vulgarity limits the scope of your effectiveness greatly. Again, let me apologize for the OT, but hey, the sooner I get this lame task done, the sooner I can power up my pod and contribute some relevant material to the group. Your future plans to contribute topcial matter are not sufficient to excuse such an imposition on my napping. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26392t=26380 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: worst company [7:25033]
I know one of tech support engineers was trying to get an eval license for Checkpoint NG and was having a terrible time. It's very frustrating when a company has a great product and lousy support. All this checkpoint bashing is really strange. I have heard it dozens of times in dozens of places. I needed a copy of Checkpoint NG recently for a project I'm working on. I called the local checkpoint rep on Friday. On monday afternoon he met me at my workplace and delivered a copy of NG along with 2 eval licenses and an engineering contact to aid with any questions. Maybe I just got lucky. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25108t=25033 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Enable secret hacking [7:23670]
The reason I asked was to see if other peoples impression was the same as mine. I've got the tools for the level 7 passwords, but was under the impression that the enable secret was almost impossible. This is a dangerous assumption. Nothing is impossible, and this has little to do with the method used to secure the password. If your admins choose a simple password, than the process to break it is simple. If they select a strong password, then the process is longer, but not ever impossible. If the attacker can gain a copy of your config, via SNMP for example, and actually see the encrypted output, you should not consider any password secure, no matter how complex it is. Personally, I have a very nice RS/6000 B50 sitting in my lab rack at home, and would have no problem commiting all its cycles to a task like password cracking. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23780t=23670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: a question from lan switching book [7:23764]
is shared means that there is a 10M ethernet, if there are 10 station in this network, every station has the 1M? or is shared means that there is a 10M ethernet, if there are 10 station in this network every station has the 10M bandwidth when you transmisstion, (csma/cd) after this station trasmisted, another can transmit and has 10M bandwidth. is mean that all station fight for bandwith of that 10mb. Only 1 station can send packet each time, so is not true that each station have the 1mb. Is true that one station at time has all 10mb. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23793t=23764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: a question from lan switching book [7:23764]
In this environment where only 1 PC can speak at a time, that PC is able to use the entire bandwidth of the pipe to send one frame. That frame travels at 10 Mbps. Specifically, the frame doesn't actually travel at 10mbs. The frame travels at the speed of electrical current on a medium. This speed is the same for 10mb ethernet, 100mb ethernet, GigE, etc. The frame is copied to the medium at 10mbs... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23801t=23764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: anthonypanda.com [7:22029]
A few days ago a couple people posted the URL: http://www.anthonypanda.com/ . I was wondering if anybody has actually bought stuff from him? What did you think of the product, and the service? What was the shipping like? He's in Hong Kong, and I don't want to wait a long time, since I want to complete my lab and start doing some experiments. Looking at his website, I see that his prices are significantly better then kg2.com. I've bought things from him via eBay, stuff like an octal cable, rack ears and serial back-to-back cables. The parts were all new and in bags, with good prices. Shipping was a bit slower, since it was coming from overseas, but it wasn't that much of a difference, and the cost of shipment was not an issue. I'd buy from him again, as his prices are indeed much cheaper than anyone I've seen. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22040t=22029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19821]
C. many reading this will not like this but the actions of the US government for decades has been in the interest of the US and much blood has been spilt by them and 3rd parties funded by them. Decades? Gee, I would say centuries. You speak of ignorance, yet you make such a foolish and psuedo-enlightened remark as this? The actions of every single nation in the world are taken in their own best interests. I hope that every action taken by my governent is taken in our, as Americans, collective best interest. I don't pay taxes to fund best interests of the rest of the world... thats what charity is for. Is the hatred you feel for your attackers of your people less valid than theirs ? What attack against these people would you find unacceptable ? The gloves are off - no ? Somebody else out there feels this against your country. But the reasons are very different. The US must try and find these people to make them answer for this but must also look inwards at the same time!! priority is to stop it happening again no ? Look at the tit for tat mess Israel is in... Tit for tat? Israel has been fighting with gloves on for far too long, in my opinion. They have the capacity to obliterate the Palestinians, and have not. Would thier adversary act with such restraint? The answer, to anyone who knows what goes on over there, is a resounding no. The Palestinians have one goal; to drive the Israeli into the sea. If that same goal were shared by the Isralei, the task would have been accomplished. I'm English and for a long time American money has paid for bullets and semtex used in my country - Money from Americans is not the same as American money, I say. Yes, we have alot of Irish Americans who fund the IRA and their ilk, but we have a far greater number that fund humanitarian efforts. To imply otherwise is arrogant, far more arrogant than you accuse your American brother of being. And for the Irish, to imply that the UK is blameless is shameless. children are dead as are many policemen not to mention the civilians popped off because they have the wrong religion. Protestants kill Catholics too, mate. And those Protestants get their bullets from?? The level of ignorance in the US is truly amazing, everybody outside the US is disgusted by this act but not many are asking why, we've got a pretty good idea. When it happens in London, we'll see what song you're singing. I don't think too many brits were complaining about American bullets during either of the World Wars. I wonder how the Argentines felt about Brittish bullets in the Falklands... I wonder how many people in India, in China, in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabil, Pakistan, Afganistan feel still about British Imperialism. The list goes on. Face facts... when England hade the resources, nothing made them happier than trying to dominate the entire world. The sun never sets on the British Empire. Well, the sun set some time ago, and don't try to play Mr. Benevolant now. And don't veil your envy so thinly... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19821t=19821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Equipment Discounts [7:17980]
- Original Message - From: Thomas Moore To: Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:15 PM Subject: CCIE Equipment Discounts [7:17980] Hi All... I am trying to cost-justify my employer paying for my CCIE Written and lab - they've paid for me CCNP and CCDP but now are a little hesitant for the CCIE due to budget constraints. I've heard over and over again that CCIE's can get a discount on Cisco equipment, I've actually heard that it was 50%, by themselves once they are CCIE certified. I've been trying to find supporting documentation for this but have not been able too. When I worked at ATT, we had a 40% discount, which I think is the max one could expect. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17988t=17980 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fob ??? [7:16224]
Does Fob in Key Fob stand for anything when referencing a Token? Weird word/acronym (it)... How on earth is this related to anything that this list is about? Anyway, a fob is a small pocket on the front of a man's pants or vest. I know I have some slacks that still have a fob, but just one or two pair. This was used to hold one's pocket watch in the time when gentelmen carried such things. It later evolved to reference the chain used to hold a pocketwatch (haven't you read the Gift of the Magi?) and then to anything attached to such a chain. So, since we don't generally wear pocketwatches, the fob is now an ornamental (or in this case not so ornamental) attachment to a chain, here being ones keychain. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16245t=16224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: a question of security [7:15609]
I am no security expert but I would think you could use private address space on your internal network and use NAT on the router. Not the best security design, but if you are limited to the specified resources, this may work! Using ACL's or, better yet, the firewall feature set, would be far better for your security posture than NAT. NAT is not a security solution Also, with the ease of use of open source firewall software and the low cost of the platforms it runs on, there is no excuse for not deploying some sort of firewall device. But keep in mind, this is just step one for securing your network... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15615t=15609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
