Re: SPAN question for 6000 IDSM [7:33757]
You could always span a trunk. Jeff ""Telemachus Luu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > How do I go about SPANning multiple vlans to a port. I have a 6000 IDSM > blade in slot 9 and the monitoring port is 1. However, I can only span one > vlan (one ingress session for both directions) at any one time. > > "set span "vlan#" 9/1" > > Running this command again for another vlan will only make the previous vlan > inactive for SPANning. > My goal is to SPAN several (15) vlans or ALL the vlans. Any suggestions? > > thanks, > Telemachus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33779&t=33757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port spanning question [7:34469]
If you want to allow the attached device to ping or browse, be it an IDS or pc, you need to add the "inpkts" cmd when setting up any span or rspan session. Jeff ""Bates, Steven (SIGNAL)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Actually what is going on is we are trying to get the port span feature > going on a 6509 with native ios. As soon as I turn on the > monitor session destination, the device that is plugged into the port can no > longer ping, etc. If this is an IDS that is monitoring an > egress pipe, how will it do session resets when appropriate? > > Steven Kell Bates Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34574&t=34469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson CCIE Skill Labs?? [7:34779]
I was wondering the same. Let me know if you hear anything. Jeff ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > Has anyone had the chance to try out the new Boson CCIE Skill Labs book? The > topics covered seem to be pretty good but not sure about the actual content. > Boson has always provided excellent learning aids for the other Cisco > exams(IMHO) and am sure that this one is also good. Just not sure if I want > to shell out the $400.00 bucks right away!! > Regards, > > The URL is : http://www.bosontraining.com > > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34799&t=34779 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brutal Attack! [7:37087]
Just passed the Written. Cheers and now beers! Jeff D Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37087&t=37087 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work with my XP box. Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37738&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
It's disabled. Have you tried it yourself? Jeff ""Jeff D"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work with > my XP box. > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37756&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mfsc [7:26752]
You can actually use ConfigSyn with Sup1/MSFC1 or Sup2/MSFC2.. I've got both configured and it works great... make sure you're running at least 12.1(8)E5 on MSFC2 though as I have run into some bugs with 12.1(7)E. Jeff ""James L Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is their a way to have redundant MSFC's on the same switch sync their > config's the same way redundant supervisor engines sync their config's? > > James L. Williams, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE > Network Engineer > 614-217-2143 Desk > 614-419-9697 Cell Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26761&t=26752 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CW2k sucking up disk space... [7:27419]
Any recommendations to free some space up on my server... I've already hit the log files. Thanks, Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27419&t=27419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decreasing telnet packet number [7:27919]
I haven't heard of this before. What are the benefits? Thanks, Jeff ""phil perry"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Can anybody remember how to decrease the amount of packets generated when > using Telnet. > > ie fewer packets with more than 1 byte of data inside them. > > I can remember only been told this as a 'by-the-way' in a course, I can't > find this info again anywhere. > > Any suggestions greatfully received, > > Phil. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27941&t=27919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Per vlan Spanntree On Gigabit ether channel. [7:27933]
The best way to do this , for instance, is to have CatA be thr root bridge for vlan2, and CatB the root bridge for vlan3. When you do this, CatC will use CatA trunk/channel for vlan 2 and CatB trunk/channel for vlan3. Remember the STP decision sequence: 1. Lowest Root BID 2. Lowest Path Cost to Root bridge 3. Lowest Sender BID 4. Lowest Port ID wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > As always thank for you for your input and ideas Cisco people. > > Situation: I have 3 Cat 6500's (Cat A,Cat B, Cat C) Cat A and B are the > main backbone and have a Gigabit Channel between then. Cat A and B's > MSFC's are routing and each MSFC has a priority routing for a vlan and HSRP > for fail over routing. > > Cat C is in the same VTP domain as Cat A and B and Cat C is the only one > which will be using FlexWan card. Cat C has a 2 pairs of Gigabit Channels > one to Cat A and the other to Cat B. > > I want to control specific Vlans on the Gigabit channels from Cat C. > Example. Gigabit channel from Cat C to Cat A.. Can I use Per val Spanning > tree and make that channel priority to a vlan which is routing though Cat > A's MSFC. I also, want to do this for the Gigabit ether channel goto up to > Cat B. > > Question: Is there a way to use per vlan spanning tree on Gigabit ethernet > Channels? > > Thank for all you help... > > Rico > > _ > $B$+$o(B & $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27942&t=27933 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ghosting and Multi cast on switches [7:28120]
Yes. Using Cat 6500's and 4006's. Let me know what your problem is and I'll see if I can help. Jeff ""chris"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am having poor performance on the Cisco 3500 using Semantic ghost and its > multicasting. > > Has anyone had this problem? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28148&t=28120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NBAR [7:28939]
Anyone using NBAR to block email virus attachments? Pros/Cons? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28939&t=28939 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: DirectTV [7:30136]
I was thinking about doing this, but was curious if anyone knows of anything better or pros/cons to this: http://store.yahoo.com/dialadish/dirtvdsssatt.html Cheers, Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30136&t=30136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Funny CSU WIC-T1 problem. [7:30264]
Just curious if this has ever happened to anyone... I had one of my T-1's go down today. Turned out is was actually on my end. Anyways, I ran a loopback from the CLI to no avail (Down/Down). I then went and swapped my cable, nota. So what the hey, I put it in loopback by pressing the button on the module itself. I did this twice as I'm weird like that funny thing though... after I took it out of the loopback the second time, my interface came back up (UP/UP)! I thought this was very strange and can only assume that I have a failing CSU? Everything looks cool now though. I do have spares, but I left it to see if this happens again soon. Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30264&t=30264 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static or dynamic VLANs [7:33014]
We use static, although I had a large test-bed setup with dynamic vlans. The good thing about static vlans is when it comes to troubleshooting. If you keep vlan1 (teachers) and vlan2 (students) in one closet, and vlan3 (teachers) and vlan4 (students) in another closet, it simpilifies things (teachers for example don't have to be in the same vlan, but you can still give vlans 1 and 3 the same access to resources through ACL's/VACL's, or NT shares for that matter). For example, say you have a STP or multicast anomoly... you have confined the problem to one closet versus the entire campus. Hopefully that made sense! Vlans rock, Jeff ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The role I currently serve offers me little chance to configure/manage LAN > switches. I was wondering if everyone can provide feedback as to whether > they use static or dynamic VLANs. I'm curious to know which one is more > prevalent. For those of you that manage campus type networks, I'm interested > in knowing who deploys which. I'd like to hear real world scenarios to add > to my reading. > > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33147&t=33014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SolarWinds [7:33606]
What's Up Gold rocks. If you've got the loot, you can integrate WebNM (they use mrtg) which is even cooler. We use this at work, and I love it. Check out www.somix.com and www.ipswitch.com These are much cheaper solutions than alot of the stuff out there (hp openview/tivoli) Jeff \ ""Richard Tufaro"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone have any experience with solar winds Orion, software for monitoring > the WAN/LAN? Also anyone have a suggestion for an enterprise LAN/WAN alert > monitoring software solution? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33618&t=33606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: collisions, broadcasts, etc.
Thanks. On Monday I'll clear the counters and write that stuff down. We're doing layer 2 switching with fast ethernet to all the closets and about half/half to the desktops (10/100). There's mostly switches in the closets but we do have some hubs as well. We have Spectrum and I'm still learning it but I did just figure out how to take reports with it before I left on Friday. I should now be able to see where most of the traffic is coming/going. Thanks for your help. I'll post back the info I get next week. Jeff ""Chuck Larrieu"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 002401bfe2fc$e77f9f80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002401bfe2fc$e77f9f80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, of course, the real question is over what period of time is all this > happening? > > First thing - your readout states: > > "Last clearing of "show interface" counters never" > > if the routers have been up for five years, this may not really be a > problem. :-> > > So you might want to do a "clear counters" then check every hour or two > during the day and write down the numbers you see. > > If your organization can afford it, something like a lan meter ( Fluke makes > a good one. There are others I'm sure ) or better yet, a protocol analyzer > can help you monitor, compile, and graph lan conditions. > > Also, you don't mention is you are hubbed, bridged, switched, or some > combination of the above. > > Your internet router - you really have 1500 or so users? All hitting the > net? All listen to live radio or broadcast.com? something to keep in mind. > This router, a funnel point, may indeed be showing you that 1) it should be > full duplex and 2) you need more bandwitdth to your ISP > > HTH > > Chuck > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeff > Duchin > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 11:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: collisions, broadcasts, etc. > > Greetings. Here's the boat I'm in... I'm new here and what we have is a flat > network with 7 Class C subnets. We have a Windows/MAC mixed environment. All > the PC's point to themselves for their Default Gateway (?) and the MAC's are > using a 7206 router so they can talk across the 2 domains we have > (student/staff). I was looking at the interfaces and noticed what looked to > be like WAY too many collisions going on. Could someone please give me some > basics about the following show int command I'm posting? > > Ethernet4/0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is AmdP2, address is 0010.543e.c420 (bia 0010.543e.c420) > Internet address is --.--.--.254/24 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, load 21/255 > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 1157 drops; input queue 0/75, 386 drops > 5 minute input rate 25 bits/sec, 161 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 838000 bits/sec, 161 packets/sec > 115967108 packets input, 273292174 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 8605468 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > 127539144 packets output, 2111505262 bytes, 0 underruns > 65699 output errors, 11844662 collisions, 1 interface resets > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 3187621 deferred > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > ...this one connects to the firewall which then goes to a 2610 and out to > our ISP: > > Ethernet4/1 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is AmdP2, address is 0010.543e.c421 (bia 0010.543e.c421) > Internet address is --.--.--.--/29 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, load 8/255 > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 4 drops > 5 minute input rate 79 bits/sec, 138 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 327000 bits/sec, 139 packets/sec > 118927484 packets input, 1484556823 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 3781 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > 99391467 packets output, 2861528053 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 3113576 collisions, 1 interface resets > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 1769674 deferred > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FA
All you veterans... [7:26301]
Check it out for reimbursement: https://www.gibill.va.gov/Education/LCVets.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26301&t=26301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network design question [7:52762]
How many users per IDF? Jeff ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports. Hoever, > like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to > plan for VOIP in a few months time. > > My topology looked like > > [Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006] > / \ / > \ >/ \/ > \ > / \ / > \ > [Cat2950][Cat2950] > [Cat2950][cat2950] and would extend out another level > > That kind of worked for 460 ports: > > Would this design work: > > [---Core Switch - > Cisco Catalyst 4006-] Floor Closet-Level 3 > (core room) > / \ / > \ > / \/ > \ > / \ / > \ > [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] > [Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] > > Floor Closet-Level 1 > Floor Closet-Level 2 > > All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core 4006. > The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC port. > Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be better > just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ? > > Thanks for your time. > > John > Sydney Australia > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52765&t=52762 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network design question [7:52762]
Intermediate Distribution Facility. Usually where your Access Layer switches reside. Jeff - Original Message - From: "Tunji Suleiman" To: ; Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:02 AM Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762] > Hi Jeff Duchin, pls what's IDF? > > Regards > > > >From: "Jeff D" > >Reply-To: "Jeff D" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762] > >Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:11:16 GMT > > > >How many users per IDF? > > > >Jeff > > > >""John Brandis"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports. > >Hoever, > > > like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to > > > plan for VOIP in a few months time. > > > > > > My topology looked like > > > > > > [Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006] > > > / \ / > > > \ > > >/ \/ > > > \ > > > / \ / > > > \ > > > [Cat2950][Cat2950] > > > [Cat2950][cat2950] and would extend out another level > > > > > > That kind of worked for 460 ports: > > > > > > Would this design work: > > > > > > [---Core Switch - > > > Cisco Catalyst 4006-] Floor Closet-Level > >3 > > > (core room) > > > / \ / > > > \ > > > / \/ > > > \ > > > / \ / > > > \ > > > [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] > > > [Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] > > > > > > Floor Closet-Level 1 > > > Floor Closet-Level 2 > > > > > > All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core > >4006. > > > The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC port. > > > Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be > >better > > > just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ? > > > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > > > John > > > Sydney Australia > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > visit http://www.solution6.com > > > > > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > > > > > * > > > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > > > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you > >cannot > > > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, > >please > > > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of > >the > > > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > > > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business > >of > > > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > * > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52953&t=52762 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
