[Cooker] autoconf tricked?
Hey Guillaume, I'm not an autoconf expert, but this program seems to be tricking your /usr/bin/autoconf script: bash-2.05b$ ./autogen.sh Running autoheader FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Running aclocal Running automake Running autoconf FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Something is wrong here! Or is it the author's configure.in file? Austin bash-2.05b$ autoheader-2.13 FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script bash-2.05b$ autoheader-2.5x ac-wrapper: ouch, couldn't call binary (/usr/bin/autom4te-2.13). autoheader-2.5x: autom4te failed with exit status: 2 at /usr/bin/autoheader-2.5x line 163 bash-2.05b$ cat configure.in dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_INIT(gnome-file-manager, 1.0) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(configure.in) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(AC_PACKAGE_NAME, AC_PACKAGE_VERSION) AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) ##dnl Add PONG support ##AM_PROG_XML_I18N_TOOLS ##AM_PROG_PONG AM_SANITY_CHECK AM_MAINTAINER_MODE AC_PROG_CC AC_PROG_CPP AC_PROG_INSTALL AC_PROG_MAKE_SET # gnome, gtk+, ... PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GFM, libgnomeui-2.0 libglade-2.0) AC_SUBST(GFM_CFLAGS) AC_SUBST(GFM_LIBS) dnl Add the languages which your application supports here. ALL_LINGUAS= AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT GETTEXT_PACKAGE=AC_PACKAGE_NAME AC_SUBST(GETTEXT_PACKAGE) AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(GETTEXT_PACKAGE, $GETTEXT_PACKAGE, i don't know what should be here) AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT AC_PROG_INTLTOOL AC_OUTPUT([ Makefile src/Makefile po/Makefile.in testing/Makefile pixmaps/Makefile help/Makefile help/C/Makefile intltool-extract intltool-merge intltool-update ])
Re: [Cooker] autoconf tricked?
Looks similar as when you try to compile kde with automake 1.6 (instead of 1.4). I thought kde was at fault, but since Laurent seems to ignore my mails, maybe it is the script. On 17 Sep 2002, Austin Acton wrote: Hey Guillaume, I'm not an autoconf expert, but this program seems to be tricking your /usr/bin/autoconf script: bash-2.05b$ ./autogen.sh Running autoheader FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Running aclocal Running automake Running autoconf FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Something is wrong here! Or is it the author's configure.in file? Austin bash-2.05b$ autoheader-2.13 FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script bash-2.05b$ autoheader-2.5x ac-wrapper: ouch, couldn't call binary (/usr/bin/autom4te-2.13). autoheader-2.5x: autom4te failed with exit status: 2 at /usr/bin/autoheader-2.5x line 163 bash-2.05b$ cat configure.in dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_INIT(gnome-file-manager, 1.0) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(configure.in) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(AC_PACKAGE_NAME, AC_PACKAGE_VERSION) AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) ##dnl Add PONG support ##AM_PROG_XML_I18N_TOOLS ##AM_PROG_PONG AM_SANITY_CHECK AM_MAINTAINER_MODE AC_PROG_CC AC_PROG_CPP AC_PROG_INSTALL AC_PROG_MAKE_SET # gnome, gtk+, ... PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GFM, libgnomeui-2.0 libglade-2.0) AC_SUBST(GFM_CFLAGS) AC_SUBST(GFM_LIBS) dnl Add the languages which your application supports here. ALL_LINGUAS= AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT GETTEXT_PACKAGE=AC_PACKAGE_NAME AC_SUBST(GETTEXT_PACKAGE) AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(GETTEXT_PACKAGE, $GETTEXT_PACKAGE, i don't know what should be here) AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT AC_PROG_INTLTOOL AC_OUTPUT([ Makefile src/Makefile po/Makefile.in testing/Makefile pixmaps/Makefile help/Makefile help/C/Makefile intltool-extract intltool-merge intltool-update ])
Re: [Cooker] autoconf tricked?
No, the application is non-standard. Austin On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks similar as when you try to compile kde with automake 1.6 (instead of 1.4). I thought kde was at fault, but since Laurent seems to ignore my mails, maybe it is the script. On 17 Sep 2002, Austin Acton wrote: Hey Guillaume, I'm not an autoconf expert, but this program seems to be tricking your /usr/bin/autoconf script: bash-2.05b$ ./autogen.sh Running autoheader FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Running aclocal Running automake Running autoconf FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script Something is wrong here! Or is it the author's configure.in file? Austin
[Cooker] AUTOCONF
Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker? Lucio smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF
Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? Lucio Tarantino wrote: Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker? Lucio smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Lucio Tarantino wrote: Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker? autoconf2.5-2.53-2mdk is there. autoconf is a wrapper which launches autoconf 2.13 or 2.53 by some rules or explicit by setting WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 seb
Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:29:57 +0200 Lucio Tarantino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? It is in contribs (1.6 actually), which replaces automake 1.4 I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker? There is a autoconf-2.53, which you cab install besides autoconf-2.13 export the variable: WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 and it should be fine. Both questions were answered before, so it should be in the archive. -- Marcel Pol Linux 2.4.18-6mdksmp, up 32 days, 11:21
Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Lucio Tarantino wrote: Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? Look closer, automake1.6 is there. seb
Re: [Cooker] AUTOCONF
you have both in cooker: from ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS -rw-r--r-- 1 1137 ftpadm 521282 May 9 21:46 autoconf2.5-2.53-2mdk.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 1137 ftpadm 337091 Jun 14 16:00 automake1.6-1.6.2-1mdk.noarch.rpm On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Lucio Tarantino wrote: Also automake is version 1.4-p5 and not the new 1.5 why? Lucio Tarantino wrote: Hallo, I have a little question. Why in cooker there is autoconf-2.13-12mdk ( version 2.13 ) and not the new version 2.52 or 2.53? All KDE3 new project require this new version and I have mount manually but why is not in cooker? Lucio _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| _|_|_|_| _|_| _|_| _|_| _|_|_| _|_|_|_|_| _|_|_| _|_| _|_|_| _|_| _|_|_| _| _|_| _|_|_| _|_|_|_| --==** LIVETS VATTEN **==--
[Cooker] autoconf ?
How do I configure Mandrake to use autoconf 2.5 ? /M
Re: [Cooker] autoconf ?
Magnus Holmberg wrote: How do I configure Mandrake to use autoconf 2.5 ? /M export WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1
[Cooker] autoconf
I believe autoconf may need to be updated. I try to compile some apps, and they most of the time come up with the below error, or something like it. It may be the ac-wrapper.pl needs some fixing.. This Makefile is only for the CVS repository This will be deleted before making the distribution *** Creating acinclude.m4 !!! If you get recursion errors from autoconf, it is advisable to set the environment variable M4 to something including --nesting-limit=500 *** Creating list of subdirectories *** Creating configure.in *** Creating aclocal.m4 *** Creating configure *** Creating config.h template FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script *** Creating Makefile templates *** Postprocessing Makefile templates *** Creating date/time stamp *** Finished Don't forget to run ./configure If you haven't done so in a while, run ./configure --help --Bill
RE: [Cooker] autoconf
I believe autoconf may need to be updated. [...] FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.52 or higher is required for this script So install autoconf2.5 and be happy. -andrej
[Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13
Just mentioning it -- Mr. Jeremy Salch - Data Services Granbury.Com, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email www.granbury.com - Business Website www.tblx.net - Personal Website
Re: [Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13
Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2002, 10:02:43 Uhr MET, schrieb Jeremy Salch: Just mentioning it Maybe some programs still need it (incompatibilities autoconf 2.13 vs autoconf 2.5), that't why both versions are in the distribution. And they don't conflict, so where's the problem? -- Götz Waschk student of computer science university Rostock http://wwwstud.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key -- Logout Fascism! --
Re: [Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13
On Thursday 16 May 2002 10:13 am, Goetz Waschk wrote: Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2002, 10:02:43 Uhr MET, schrieb Jeremy Salch: Just mentioning it Maybe some programs still need it (incompatibilities autoconf 2.13 vs autoconf 2.5), that't why both versions are in the distribution. And they don't conflict, so where's the problem? In me being ignorant, that is all I didn't know they were both in there -- Mr. Jeremy Salch - Data Services Granbury.Com, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email www.granbury.com - Business Website www.tblx.net - Personal Website
Re: [Cooker] autoconf is very old 2.13
Jeremy Salch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just mentioning it autoconf2.5-2.53 isn't :-) -- il a ete brule au 28e degre (the naheulbeuk witch) c curieux, gcc fonctionne (gwenole)
[Cooker] Autoconf still setting executable suffix to .C for C++ compiles
-- John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Orbiscom Ltd,Web:http://www.orbiscom.com/ 3 Sandyford Park,Direct: +353-1-2178610, +353-86-2315986 Sandyford Industrial Estate, Office: +353-1-2945111 Dublin 18. Fax:+353-1-2945119 ** The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. www.Orbiscom.com **
Re: [Cooker] Autoconf still setting executable suffix to .C for C++ compiles
John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have an error scenario? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] Autoconf 2.13 broken
Borsenkow Andrej wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The autoconf 2.13 is detecting .C as the executable suffix. The problem is in the executable suffix check where it only lists *.c *.obj etc.. but not *.C which is the extension that autoconf gives to C++ test programs (conftest.C) Works fine with 2.14 autoconf-2.14 does not exist. The official releases are 2.13 and next 250 (with current being 2.52 if I'm not mistaken). 2.14 is one of intermediate internal development releaes (I know that some packages were using it). -andrej Whether 2.14 is a development release or not, that does not remove the fact that 2.13 is broken with respect to C++. I generates test programs with a .C extension, which it does not exclude from being tested as an executable extension. This needs to be fixed. -- John Allen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenSource Developer: www: http://udk.sf.net phone: intl+353-14937616 : intl+353-862315986
Re: [Cooker] Autoconf 2.13 broken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The autoconf 2.13 is detecting .C as the executable suffix. The problem is in the executable suffix check where it only lists *.c *.obj etc.. but not *.C which is the extension that autoconf gives to C++ test programs (conftest.C) Works fine with 2.14 autoconf-2.14 does not exist. The official releases are 2.13 and next 250 (with current being 2.52 if I'm not mistaken). 2.14 is one of intermediate internal development releaes (I know that some packages were using it). -andrej
[Cooker] Autoconf 2.13 broken
The autoconf 2.13 is detecting .C as the executable suffix. The problem is in the executable suffix check where it only lists *.c *.obj etc.. but not *.C which is the extension that autoconf gives to C++ test programs (conftest.C) Works fine with 2.14 -- John Allen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenSource Developer: www: http://udk.sf.net phone: intl+353-14937616 : intl+353-862315986
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: So where is rpm-build 4.0-30mdk ? [gc@obiwan ~] rpmwatch -p rpm flepied But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied I thought of Conflicts: kernel != 2.1.139 why rpm 4.1 was not released? I work approximately 2 meters away from flepied, FYI. We've got a problem with gcc/ld currently. He can't rebuild rpm. He's working on it. Just don't upgrade autoconf, that's not a big deal. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 25 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied I thought of Conflicts: kernel != 2.1.139 I see. Please note that I was on drugs at that time. Or probably. Just don't upgrade autoconf, that's not a big deal. Yes, Arnd has posted a whole bunch of rpms that barfed at new autoconf. Reports are not valid, needs to change rpm. That's a bit why I put a Conflicts but anyway. And even people in gnome list keep complaining to new and tricky autoconf problems too. But.. is it too late for those who already upgraded autoconf? No. Downgrade to autoconf-2.13 from LMDK-8.0 release. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
On 25 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied I thought of Conflicts: kernel != 2.1.139 I see. Just don't upgrade autoconf, that's not a big deal. Yes, Arnd has posted a whole bunch of rpms that barfed at new autoconf. And even people in gnome list keep complaining to new and tricky autoconf problems too. But.. is it too late for those who already upgraded autoconf? Abel
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed May 23 16:05:31 2001 - version 2.50 (hope this doesn't break too much things...) # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk So what? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed May 23 16:05:31 2001 - version 2.50 (hope this doesn't break too much things...) # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk So what? So where is rpm-build 4.0-30mdk ? seb
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed May 23 16:05:31 2001 - version 2.50 (hope this doesn't break too much things...) # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk So what? So it's not going to break anything if we cannot install it. @#%%#()*()! =-= kk1 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed May 23 16:05:31 2001 - version 2.50 (hope this doesn't break too much things...) # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk So what? So where is rpm-build 4.0-30mdk ? [gc@obiwan ~] rpmwatch -p rpm flepied -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
On 24 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: So where is rpm-build 4.0-30mdk ? [gc@obiwan ~] rpmwatch -p rpm flepied But if you want you can set Conflict: rpm = 4.1 too. Contact flipied why rpm 4.1 was not released?
[Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-=-= Name: autoconf Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.50 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed May 23 16:05:31 2001 - version 2.50 (hope this doesn't break too much things...) # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk =-= kk1 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.50-1mdk conflicts w/ rpm-build
On 23 May 2001, Quel Qun wrote: # rpm -Uvh autoconf-2.50-1mdk.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk conflicts with autoconf-2.50-1mdk # rpm -q rpm-build rpm-build-4.0-30mdk From autoconf spec: Conflicts: rpm-build = 4.0-30mdk Abel
[Cooker] Autoconf bugs?
I was trying to compile some of the nightly Evolution snapshots and got the below message: creating gal/menus/Makefile creating gal/shortcut-bar/Makefile creating tests/Makefile creating docs/Makefile creating gal.spec creating stamp.h ./config.status: line 600: syntax error: unexpected end of file Bad exit status from /home/drfickle/src/RPM/tmp/rpm-tmp.74787 (%build) Normally I'd think it's the Evolution team's fault, but then I tried compiling the commercial version of SSH (2.4.0don't ask) and that got the same error. Is there perhaps a bug in autoconf that I'm hitting? -- Steve Fox http://k-lug.com
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Reinhard Katzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm,=20 without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Eric MC I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). arg. did you read my previous posts? I did. the 0.0.7 does *not* need a patch to acconfig.h Sorry on MY box it needed. (mkd 7) So I did. And always runs ok. I'll do it not over again to certify. Eric MC -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Hi Eric! but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). Guillaume Cottenceau don't believe me when I said that #undef PACKAGE and ..VERSION must be added to acconfig.h (from the autoconfig package) to compile tse3. Without it, it wouldn't compile, asked always about PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h. Hmm, this did not occur to me. Maybe I have an older version of autoconf (2.13-4mdk) which does not bug me for that. An other point: the --with.. prefixes for kmid don't work at compile time. So I had no choice and must compile with tse3. Well to cite from my spec file: BuildRequires: qt2-devel, tse3 Conflicts: kmid %description Noteedit is a note setting editor with the following properties: A bit drastic move, maybe it's better to add it to tse3, no ? Best regards, Reinhard Katzmann -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Projects: Linux-Installation Mandrake 7.1 (95% finished) Improvements of Driver for Tevion Tablet Java-DB and -Interface for Pincity (93 % finished) GnuPG Public Key available on request. PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Hi! On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Eric MC.D wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: Can you send the SRPM for investigation? I do not see any tse* packages in our distribution. The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm, without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Eric MC I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). Best regards, Reinhard Katzmann -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Projects: Linux-Installation Mandrake 7.1 (95% finished) Improvements of Driver for Tevion Tablet Java-DB and -Interface for Pincity (93 % finished) GnuPG Public Key available on request. PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Reinhard Katzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm,=20 without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Eric MC I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). arg. did you read my previous posts? the 0.0.7 does *not* need a patch to acconfig.h -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Reinhard Katzmann wrote: Hi! On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Eric MC.D wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: Can you send the SRPM for investigation? I do not see any tse* packages in our distribution. The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm, without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Eric MC I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be I hope so, great prog. integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). Guillaume Cottenceau don't believe me when I said that #undef PACKAGE and ..VERSION must be added to acconfig.h (from the autoconfig package) to compile tse3. Without it, it wouldn't compile, asked always about PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h. An other point: the --with.. prefixes for kmid don't work at compile time. So I had no choice and must compile with tse3. Eric MC Best regards, Reinhard Katzmann -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Projects: Linux-Installation Mandrake 7.1 (95% finished) Improvements of Driver for Tevion Tablet Java-DB and -Interface for Pincity (93 % finished) GnuPG Public Key available on request. Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Proabably a chmou sucks :-). see carefully the Changelog big man : --=-=-= * Fri Mar 31 2000 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-2mdk - new groups * Mon Mar 06 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-1mdk - Back to last 2.13 and stable version, add a serial. * Wed Oct 27 1999 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Merge change of Jeff package. * Thu May 13 1999 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mandrake adaptions - 2.14.1 --=-=-= Bero has updated to the cvs version of 2.14.1 some time ago, but i did the changes back like the upstream author has requested (and there was problem with the 2.14 since it's still in beta). -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Proabably a chmou sucks :-). see carefully the Changelog big man : --=-=-= * Fri Mar 31 2000 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-2mdk - new groups * Mon Mar 06 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-1mdk - Back to last 2.13 and stable version, add a serial. * Wed Oct 27 1999 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Merge change of Jeff package. * Thu May 13 1999 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mandrake adaptions - 2.14.1 --=-=-= Bero has updated to the cvs version of 2.14.1 some time ago, but i did the changes back like the upstream author has requested (and there was problem with the 2.14 since it's still in beta). ooops. sorry chmou i did not even think of consulting the changelog :-(( /me sucks BIGTIME -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Reinhard Katzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm,=20 without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Eric MC I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). arg. did you read my previous posts? I did. ..you did not commented out my message where i showed you the `grep' results with the PACKAGE and VERSION inside. also i launched the compile and all went well. the 0.0.7 does *not* need a patch to acconfig.h Sorry on MY box it needed. (mkd 7) So I did. And always runs ok. I'll do it not over again to certify. yes. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] I have written a spec file for ts3, which I did not yet post because I wait for feedback from Lenny, if noteedit may be I hope so, great prog. integrated or not. I have not changed acconfig.h in this package but I'll do it before I post the spec (and the patch). Guillaume Cottenceau don't believe me when I said that #undef PACKAGE and ..VERSION must be added to acconfig.h I believed you, then did the test, then saw you were wrong, then wrote that on the list, but apparently you don't read my posts? Or don't consider them. Did you inspect the latest source of ts3 searching for PACAKGE stuff in config.h.in ? This is just what is needed, as I told you, several times. (from the autoconfig package) to compile tse3. "autoconf" package, please read my posts :-(. Without it, it wouldn't compile, asked always about PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h. does not on our compilation machines. (sorry) An other point: the --with.. prefixes for kmid don't work at compile time. So I had no choice and must compile with tse3. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION Let me precise my thinking, relatively to the last post: I mean, if you want to have it in your programs, the proper way is to put "#undef PACKAGE" (and so on) in your config.h.in It is ! But without the same in acconfig.h it wouldn't compile. Compiled package: tse3-0.0.7 Can you send the SRPM for investigation? I do not see any tse* packages in our distribution. [gc@kenobi ~] ls /RPMS/tse* ls: /RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory [gc@kenobi ~] ls /contrib/RPMS/tse* ls: /contrib/RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory What puzzles me is that I have even wrote myself some programs with configure support, and I always use the VERSION and PACKAGE preprocessor variables in my code for the `--help' output, and it actually works. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION Let me precise my thinking, relatively to the last post: I mean, if you want to have it in your programs, the proper way is to put "#undef PACKAGE" (and so on) in your config.h.in It is ! But without the same in acconfig.h it wouldn't compile. Compiled package: tse3-0.0.7 Can you send the SRPM for investigation? I do not see any tse* packages in our distribution. [gc@kenobi ~] ls /RPMS/tse* ls: /RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory [gc@kenobi ~] ls /contrib/RPMS/tse* ls: /contrib/RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm, without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Eric MC What puzzles me is that I have even wrote myself some programs with configure support, and I always use the VERSION and PACKAGE preprocessor variables in my code for the `--help' output, and it actually works. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] [gc@kenobi ~] ls /RPMS/tse* ls: /RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory [gc@kenobi ~] ls /contrib/RPMS/tse* ls: /contrib/RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm, without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Which acconfig.h? the system-wide one or the one that is part of the code distributed with the package? If you can send me a pointer to the package I can investigate. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
"Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] [gc@kenobi ~] ls /RPMS/tse* ls: /RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory [gc@kenobi ~] ls /contrib/RPMS/tse* ls: /contrib/RPMS/tse*: No such file or directory The tse3 is a package needed by noteedit ! it's in .tar format not from mandrake. The config.h.in in this package mentio. a PACKAGE and VERSION but it also need this from autoconfig (acconfig.h). So when I added it to acconfig.h all builds as a charm, without it nothing to do. So apparantly some packages needs PACKAGE and VERSION in acconfig.h to compile. Which acconfig.h? the system-wide one or the one that is part of the code distributed with the package? The acconfig.h of autoconfig-...mdk.rpm The package who's need PACKAGE and VERSION on the acconfig.h from autoconfig-...mdk.rpm , is : http://tse3.sourceforge.net In the current version it works. [gc@kenobi ~/rpm/tmp/tse3-0.0.7] rgrep -h VERSION config.h* Makefile* config.h:#define VERSION "0.0.7" config.h.in:#undef VERSION Makefile:VERSION = 0.0.7 Makefile:distdir = $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION) Makefile.in:VERSION = @VERSION@ Makefile.in:distdir = $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION) Did you say there was no config.h.in ? Maybe the author saw his error :-). (and by the way it's not `autoconfig', it's `autoconf') -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION Let me precise my thinking, relatively to the last post: I mean, if you want to have it in your programs, the proper way is to put "#undef PACKAGE" (and so on) in your config.h.in It is ! But without the same in acconfig.h it wouldn't compile. Compiled package: tse3-0.0.7 Eric MC -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.14.1-9mdk
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: "Eric MC.D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have above package installed, but when searching on rpmfind.net found only a lower version ?? not announced on freshmeat; these two ftp sites are unreachable ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/autoconf/ ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/autoconf/ this ftp site only shows the 2.13 version ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/gnu/autoconf/ where did you get the 2.14.1? who is the packager? From MacMillan CD'S vers. 7 Distribution : Linux-Mandrake Packager : Chmouel Boudjnah Build time : Tue Oct 26 09:45:46 1999 So what happen ? Eric MC Some progs to be installed requires VERSION and PACKAGE. So please add on acconfig.h: /* Define VERSION and PACKLAGE */ #undef PACKAGE #undef VERSION What do you mean? Most well `autoconfigured' programs do have access to the PACKAGE and VERSION defined by the configure script. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
[Cooker] autoconf-2.13-4mdk || automake-1.4-11mdk
One of the rpms (the second, I daresay) in the subject brakes compilation of other packages, at least; - gettext-0.10.35-14mdk.src.rpm - rpm-3.0.5-0.29mdk.src.rpm They both blame: ... + make cd . aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE' not found in library aclocal: configure.in: 11: macro `AM_CONFIG_HEADER' not found in library aclocal: configure.in: 137: macro `AM_C_PROTOTYPES' not found in library aclocal: configure.in: 343: macro `AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE' not found in library make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49157 (%build) -- _ D.Parodi e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url:http://web.tiscalinet.it/Overspeed
Re: [Cooker] autoconf-2.13-4mdk || automake-1.4-11mdk
"D.Parodi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One of the rpms (the second, I daresay) in the subject brakes compilation of other packages, at least; - gettext-0.10.35-14mdk.src.rpm - rpm-3.0.5-0.29mdk.src.rpm They both blame: ... + make cd . aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE' not found in library aclocal: configure.in: 11: macro `AM_CONFIG_HEADER' not found in library aclocal: configure.in: 137: macro `AM_C_PROTOTYPES' not found in library aclocal: configure.in: 343: macro `AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE' not found in library Yes. I noticed that problem and automake-1.4-12mdk.noarch.rpm (released 13:13:33-CEST) fixes it. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
[Cooker] autoconf fix proposal
This package has a makeinstall problem on my system. I think I fixed it with the .diff file attached. Please integrate into cooker if possible. Thanks!! Stefan van der Eijk PS: the new src.rpm file has been uploaded to /incoming. 9c9 Release: 2mdk --- Release: 3mdk 51,52c51 make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr install --- %makeinstall 81a81,83 * Sat Jul 01 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.13-3mdk - added makeinstall macro
