[courier-users] couriermlm accepting mail from non subscriber
Hi, One feature that comes in handy with mailing list software is the ability to configure a 'subscriber posts only' list to accept mail from a list of other addresses. Or another way of looking at this is to have subscribers who do not actually receive the list emails. The whole point of this is to allow someone to submit posts to the list from multiple accounts, but only get the list at one account. Does couriermlm support such a thing? -- --- Dennis Sacks [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Things are falling down on me, heavy things I could not see" ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Virtual domains: makehosteddomains AND makeacceptmailfor - getting crazy...
Hi, I have a 513-Problem for domains hosted on my machine. Mysql is setup as a backend for auth and it worked already, but now I changed something and I don´t remember what... aargh.. I am trying this: create a file "domain.com" in /etc/courier/hosteddomains/ with content "domain.com" run makehosteddomains create a file domain.com in /etc/courier/esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/ with content "domain.com" run makeacceptmailfor I still get an 513 relaying denied error for domain.com... what is wrong? I notice, that after running makeacceptmailfor as root the file esmtpacceptmailfor.dat does not belong to daemon anymore, but root. What am I doing wrong, what can be the problem DNS is setup ok. Using courier version 0.35.0 Please give me a hint... thanks for your attention! Have a nice thread, Peter ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Help ! rfc2045 violations
I have just deployed courier mail server for about 400 users, but here in Italy we have a lot of mail coming into courier with ISO-8859-1 8bit charachters but with wrong headers (or no "Content-Type:" headers at all). I read the FAQ and I will recompile courier without the test code in courier/submit2.C but I would like to know the following: - Why the RFC2045 error notification e-mail is sent to the recipient ?? The fault is on the SENDER side: the recipient has done nothing worng and still cannot read the message... bad behavior ! This has overwhelmed our support tech personnel whith some calls. - I would like to not recompile courier for this option... many thanks for all ideas on this problem Giovanni Panozzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WorkUp SpA - via Capitano Alessio, 189 - 36027 ROSA' (VI) - ITALY Tel. +39 0424 584000 - Fax +39 0424 584099 ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: couriermlm accepting mail from non subscriber
Dennis writes: > Hi, > > One feature that comes in handy with mailing list software is the ability > to configure a 'subscriber posts only' list to accept mail from a list of > other addresses. > > Or another way of looking at this is to have subscribers who do not > actually receive the list emails. > > The whole point of this is to allow someone to submit posts to the list > from multiple accounts, but only get the list at one account. > > Does couriermlm support such a thing? Yes. See 'write-only aliases' in the couriermlm man page. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Help ! rfc2045 violations
Giovanni Panozzo writes: > > I have just deployed courier mail server for about 400 users, > but here in Italy we have a lot of mail coming into > courier with ISO-8859-1 8bit charachters but with wrong headers > (or no "Content-Type:" headers at all). > I read the FAQ and I will recompile courier without the test code > in courier/submit2.C > > but I would like to know the following: > > - Why the RFC2045 error notification e-mail is sent to the recipient ?? It's not, it's bounced to the sender. > The fault is on the SENDER side: the recipient has done nothing And that's who receives the bounce. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] mail loops back to myself (MX problem) ???
Hi courier-users, what exactly do I have to do, if I have a mail loops back to myself (MX problem). ??? I think this is an dns errorß i have several hosted domains and this error occurs on one of them if one tries to send mail to another domain hosted on the same machine... Thank you! -- Have a nice trip, Hippiesoul ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] makehosteddomain / makeacceptmailfor bug with multiple files in configdir?
Hi courier-users, I have a problem here I do not understand: I want to setup several hosteddomains. That works quite well. To make an easy configuration script, I wanted to create a new file for each domain in /etc/courier/hosteddomains/ and /etc/courier/esmtpacceptmailfor.dir containing the name of each domain, so it would be easy to handle. would look like that: /etc/courier/hosteddomains/dom1.com dom2.com dom3.com /etc/courier/esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/dom1.com dom2.com dom3.com and then run makehosteddomains and makeacceptmailfor. as I understand this is enough to setup courier to accept mail for a domain - right? (Sure I have to setup userdb - that is ok and works) ok, after fiddling around I found out, that courier did not accept multiple files in that dirs - when I give only one file, it works... is this a bug or am I misunderstanding something? also I think it is a little bit confusing that on the one hand it can be a directory or a file with the same name (hosteddomains), but on the other hand the directory esmtpaccesmailfor.dir is named different from the file esmtpacceptmailfor. Is there a reason for this? Wouldn´t it be easier to handle if all configuration files could also be directories with all files in there concatenated in case they exist? Also makeacceptmailfor says that it is missing esmtpaccesmailfor.dir if I have only a file /etc/courier/esmtpaccesmailfor I am using Courier mail server, version 0.35.0. Thank you very much for your attention. -- Have a nice trip, Hippiesoul ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
R: [courier-users] Re: Help ! rfc2045 violations
>> - Why the RFC2045 error notification e-mail is sent to the >recipient ?? > >It's not, it's bounced to the sender. > >> The fault is on the SENDER side: the recipient has done nothing > >And that's who receives the bounce. doesn't works maybe I forgot something... I just upgraded to 0.36.1, compiled as-is (without the FAQ's patch for rfc2045 msg) but the sender gets back nothing. I tested it with senders on different mailservers. And,of course, the recipient still receive the message in an attachment (very bad...). The test I have done from two different linux boxes, with sendmail and in two different locations, is: mail -s "8bit break test" [EMAIL PROTECTED] àèèòòàà . (if you can't read it, the line after "mail" contains only accented vowels of ISO8859-1 charset (ASCII CODE >= 128). ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Maildrop receipes multiple lines
Originally to: All Hi, I am trying to check for the existance of Recieved Lines after Subject line as this is a common spam header, I have tried combinations of /^Subject:(.*)Received/:w to no avail. Anyone know what I need to do. I am slowly converting Spamblaster to Maildrop Sean ... Who needs spam when you've got posters like us <-> Gateway Information. This message originated from a Fidonet System (http://www.fidonet.org) and was gated at TCOB1 (http://www.tcob1.net) Please do not respond direct to this message but via the list ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] feature request for authdaemon: cache mechanism
Hello, Authdaemon system don't seem to have any cache system. For authmethod that need database access, I think that it's not really powerfull. What about implementing a cache mechanism in authdaemon ? I'm sorry if it is already in the TODO list. best regards, -- ___ O l i v i e rP o i t r e y ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Pegasus Mail v4.01(Win32)
Hello, Is here any admins who replaced outlook's with Pegasus Mail? How it(Pegasus Mail) works with Courier? Who can tell about advantages or disadvantages? ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] 8bit new behaviour
Hi Sam, As of 0.36.1, every message violating RFC2045/6/7 goes directly to the INBOX, bypassing maildrop filters. Is this the intended behaviour or just a glitch? Because I'm suscribed to a we-send-8bit-without-headers-all-the-time mailing list, and it's getting annoying ;) Later.- ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: THREAD REFERENCES
--On Friday, December 07, 2001 12:10 AM -0500 Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this might be a small bug due to an inadvertent conversion of > references headers to uppercase, before threading them. This is easily > fixed. > > -- > Sam Hey, that looks much better. Thanks, Sam! Jeff -- Jeff Tucker Williams Consulting, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] SHUTDOWN: respawnhi limit reached.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > The mail server is busy much of the time, but I don't think it's busy > > enough to naturally hit the respawnhi timeout. It looks like somehow > > courier missed that a child finished and that's why it hit the respawnhi > > timeout. > > I was wrong about that. The child processes are still legitimately > running. As fate would have it just as I started this email, I was pulled > in to some mail server issues and noticed that the respawnhi thing had > happened again. All of the couriersmtp processes were stuck in a read() > system call on fd 5. I have the control file from a couple, and there are > lots of DNS failures recorded. > > It's much too late to do any debugging right now, but I'll be over this > tomorrow. In any case, it's not that courierd isn't harvesting children, > it's that the children are blocking on an unprotected read(). (I thought > they all had alarms in place... /me shrugs) I checked for any running processes, but I couldn't find any. I do have lots of courier related process running (authdaemon, pop and imap) so I may have missed one. Either way, my system sat for 6 hours or so doing nothing. If you're right that there was a process still running, something is missing a timeout. I wonder what the longest timeout is. I guess presumably the respawnhi could happen at a time right after a legitimate process is spawned which then needs to timeout to a client, there will always be the chance that courier just stops delivering email for a while. respawnhi seems to need some sort of timeout, even if it's extremely long. > > The system is Linux 2.2 running Courier 0.35.1. I had planned on > > upgrading to 0.36.1, but I don't see anything in the changelogs about > > this. > > My system, too. Mine's running on SlackWare 8. Yours? > > None of the Red Hat systems I run courier on have this issue, but none of > them are very high traffic systems, either. It's a VA Linux 7.1.1 system which is based on RedHat 7.1. This system is busy in that it delivers a couple of thousand emails a day, which relative to other systems, is minor. JE ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
R: [courier-users] Re: Help ! rfc2045 violations / Outlook Express (8bits)
And worse: Outlook Express 5.5 italian version stars each mime HTML email with an accented wowel in the first part of the email. This is rejected by courier, this is only in OE5.5 not in OE6.0 or OE5.0 See the following: - Received: from ns1.avnet.it (ns1.avnet.it [:::195.246.192.14]) by ns1.workup.it with esmtp; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:22:15 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by ns1.avnet.it (8.11.3/8.11.3) id fB7FHfd18176 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:17:41 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:17:41 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Giovanni Panozzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Catalogo Alexander To: Giovanni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0010_01C17E47.CA9191C0" Messaggio in formato MIME composto da più parti. --=_NextPart_000_0010_01C17E47.CA9191C0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_001_0011_01C17E47.CA9191C0" --=_NextPart_001_0011_01C17E47.CA9191C0 ... ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] 8bit new behaviour
on 7/12/01 9:51 am, Papo Napolitano at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Sam, > > As of 0.36.1, every message violating RFC2045/6/7 goes directly to the > INBOX, bypassing maildrop filters. > Is this the intended behaviour or just a glitch? > Because I'm suscribed to a we-send-8bit-without-headers-all-the-time mailing > list, and it's getting annoying ;) > > Later.- Only Sam will be able to say for sure whether this was the intended behaviour. However, I do know that he has recently changed the handling of badly formed messages after many people, including myself, complained repeatedly that such messages were being bounced. Personally, I am relieved that Sam has taken the trouble to act so quickly on this issue. Have you reported this to the administrator of the offending mailing list? -- Tim Hosking Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Mailfilter
--Gordon Messmer wrote on 06.12.2001 22:05 -0800: > If a module can't modify the original, then I suppose what I'll do is > rewrite the message, privately submit a cleaned version of the message > into the queue, and reject the original with a message indicating that the > message will be cleaned and received by the intended recipient. This is the best solution. > The other thing I was going to ask you was about the control files. My > python filter gets the full path to the message body, but after that it > just reads the queue name from the socket, AFAICT. Aren't the control > file names supposed to come through as well? You have to dig them out of the source. I made a hack some months ago, and Alessandro Vesely made something for his virus-filter just a few weeks ago. Roland ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: couriermlm accepting mail from non subscriber
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Yes. See 'write-only aliases' in the couriermlm man page. Ahh. Somehow I missed that. Thanks. Is the only way to add a write-only alias to have the subscriber do it or is there a way for the list administrator to do it? -- --- Dennis Sacks [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Things are falling down on me, heavy things I could not see" ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Virtual domains: makehosteddomains AND makeacceptmailfor - getting crazy...
Peter Holm wrote:
> I am trying this:
>
> create a file "domain.com" in /etc/courier/hosteddomains/
> with content "domain.com"
> run makehosteddomains
>
> create a file domain.com in /etc/courier/esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/
> with content "domain.com"
> run makeacceptmailfor
It seemed complicate to me also, until someone on this list
told me how to do it. Now I have just two files in esmtpacceptmailfor.dir:
hosted and relayed. I have a script for adding hosted domains, that
ends like this (after checking parameters and chdir to /etc/courier or
whatever):
" if [ ! "x$list" = "x" ]; then
" printf "updating courier config files\n"
" for DOMAIN in $list
" do
"printf "$DOMAIN\n" >> hosteddomains
" done
" cat hosteddomains |\
"awk '{print $1;}' |\
"sort |\
"uniq > esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/hosted
" makeacceptmailfor
" makehosteddomains
" chown -R courier:courier .
" fi
The awk filter is needed since a few lines in hosteddomains are
of the form "myserver.mydomain.tld\tmydomain.tld\n"
> I notice, that after running makeacceptmailfor as root the file
> esmtpacceptmailfor.dat does not belong to daemon anymore, but root.
I noticed that too, just chown. Perhaps there's a better way.
Ciao
Ale
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] 8bit new behaviour
Tim Hosking wrote: > Only Sam will be able to say for sure whether this was the intended > behaviour. However, I do know that he has recently changed the handling of > badly formed messages after many people, including myself, complained > repeatedly that such messages were being bounced. Personally, I am relieved > that Sam has taken the trouble to act so quickly on this issue. Ditto that. -andy ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] 8bit new behaviour
Yeah, I know about the new handling and I like it too (Our customers don't hehe). Not yet reported the problem as only 5 messages came badly formed not all, so I'm sure it's not a mailing list problem. >- Original Message - >From: Tim Hosking >To: Papo Napolitano ; Courier >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:08 PM >Subject: Re: [courier-users] 8bit new behaviour > > >on 7/12/01 9:51 am, Papo Napolitano at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi Sam, >> >> As of 0.36.1, every message violating RFC2045/6/7 goes directly to the >> INBOX, bypassing maildrop filters. >> Is this the intended behaviour or just a glitch? >> Because I'm suscribed to a we-send-8bit-without-headers-all-the-time mailing >> list, and it's getting annoying ;) >> >> Later.- > >Only Sam will be able to say for sure whether this was the intended >behaviour. However, I do know that he has recently changed the handling of >badly formed messages after many people, including myself, complained >repeatedly that such messages were being bounced. Personally, I am relieved >that Sam has taken the trouble to act so quickly on this issue. > >Have you reported this to the administrator of the offending mailing list? > > >-- >Tim Hosking >Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: SHUTDOWN: respawnhi limit reached.
Johannes Erdfelt writes: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: >> > The mail server is busy much of the time, but I don't think it's busy >> > enough to naturally hit the respawnhi timeout. It looks like somehow >> > courier missed that a child finished and that's why it hit the respawnhi >> > timeout. >> >> I was wrong about that. The child processes are still legitimately >> running. As fate would have it just as I started this email, I was pulled >> in to some mail server issues and noticed that the respawnhi thing had >> happened again. All of the couriersmtp processes were stuck in a read() >> system call on fd 5. I have the control file from a couple, and there are >> lots of DNS failures recorded. >> >> It's much too late to do any debugging right now, but I'll be over this >> tomorrow. In any case, it's not that courierd isn't harvesting children, >> it's that the children are blocking on an unprotected read(). (I thought >> they all had alarms in place... /me shrugs) > > I checked for any running processes, but I couldn't find any. I do have > lots of courier related process running (authdaemon, pop and imap) so I > may have missed one. > > Either way, my system sat for 6 hours or so doing nothing. If you're > right that there was a process still running, something is missing a > timeout. > > I wonder what the longest timeout is. I guess presumably the respawnhi > could happen at a time right after a legitimate process is spawned which > then needs to timeout to a client, there will always be the chance that > courier just stops delivering email for a while. > > respawnhi seems to need some sort of timeout, even if it's extremely > long. The server is designed to restart itself only when no mail is pending. The problem is that the client should not be stuck like that. There's a select() before every read from the socket, so if anything, it should be stuck in a select(). Get the date of the stuck message, and review your logs to see if there are any errors in syslog around that time, or a little bit later. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: couriermlm accepting mail from non subscriber
Dennis writes: > On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> Yes. See 'write-only aliases' in the couriermlm man page. > > Ahh. Somehow I missed that. Thanks. Is the only way to add a > write-only alias to have the subscriber do it or is there a way for the > list administrator to do it? I don't believe there is a way to directly poke the database. You could, of course, send a note ahead of time to approve the write-only alias request, then forge an alias-subscribe message, and have the original recipient approve it. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: R: [courier-users] Re: Help ! rfc2045 violations
Giovanni Panozzo writes: > >>> - Why the RFC2045 error notification e-mail is sent to the >>recipient ?? >> >>It's not, it's bounced to the sender. >> >>> The fault is on the SENDER side: the recipient has done nothing >> >>And that's who receives the bounce. > > doesn't works > maybe I forgot something... I just upgraded to 0.36.1, This was changed in 0.36.1. Instead of bouncing, the mail is converted to a separate attachment. Before that, the message was bounced. If you want to bounce it, you can still do it quite easily with a simple mail filter. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] images in SqWebMail with Courier 0.36.1
I just upgraded to Courier 0.36.1. On the webmail pages, such as the login page, I am now getting things like this: [#@logo.gif, width="263" height="35" alt="SqWebMail Copyright 1999-2001 Double Precision, Inc." border="0"@SqWebMail - Copyright 1999-2001 Double Precision, Inc.@#] [#@signin.gif, width="102" height="39" alt="Enter your USERID and PASSWORD, below" border="0"@@#] My guess is that something didn't work right in the configuration and I didn't catch it. However, everything is functioning like it use to other than webmail. How can I fix this problem? -andy ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Courier 20011107
Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php First cut at groupware calendaring. See pcp/README.html for instructions. There are still a few missing pieces (send a notification E-mail after adding an event to everyone's calendar), and a few minor quirks to take care of. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: images in SqWebMail with Courier 0.36.1
Andrew Newton writes: > I just upgraded to Courier 0.36.1. > On the webmail pages, such as the login page, I am now getting things like > this: > > [#@logo.gif, width="263" height="35" alt="SqWebMail Copyright 1999-2001 > Double Precision, Inc." border="0"@SqWebMail - Copyright 1999-2001 Double > Precision, Inc.@#] > [#@signin.gif, width="102" height="39" alt="Enter your USERID and > PASSWORD, below" border="0"@@#] > > My guess is that something didn't work right in the configuration and I > didn't catch it. However, everything is functioning like it use to other > than webmail. > > How can I fix this problem? You forgot to install the new sqwebmail binary into your cgi-bin directory. You are still running the old binary. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] images in SqWebMail with Courier 0.36.1
Nevermind. I didn't copy the cgi-bin executables to the cgi-bin directory. Once I did that, the problem was solved. Andrew Newton wrote: > I just upgraded to Courier 0.36.1. > On the webmail pages, such as the login page, I am now getting things > like this: > > [#@logo.gif, width="263" height="35" alt="SqWebMail Copyright 1999-2001 > Double Precision, Inc." border="0"@SqWebMail - Copyright 1999-2001 > Double Precision, Inc.@#] > [#@signin.gif, width="102" height="39" alt="Enter your USERID and > PASSWORD, below" border="0"@@#] > > My guess is that something didn't work right in the configuration and I > didn't catch it. However, everything is functioning like it use to > other than webmail. > > How can I fix this problem? > > -andy > > > ___ > courier-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users > ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
