Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-20 Thread Niels Matthijs
Hello,

This method is not something I would recommend. The possible problems I see:

* no full use of caching. A css file needs to be loaded by a browser only once, 
then it is stored in cache. By adding a separate stylesheet for each page you 
will lose that speed gain.
* what with elements that appear on more than one page, but not on enough pages 
to put them into the main.css. Do you plan on updating all css files when the 
style of this element changes?
* The fact that you have two css files to check won't make it any easier either.
* What about new templates. People will need to create new stylesheets for 
those, even when no new elements are introduced.

When using a tool like Firebug to find css rules, the problem of a big css is 
limited. Also, using a good editor will fix most of the issues. And of course, 
there's always the trusty ctrl+F

In the long run, I would advise against this method :)

Greets,
Niels Matthijs

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: maandag 18 februari 2008 17:09
To: 'CSS Discussion'
Subject: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

Hi, all.

I'd like to know your thoughts on including separate
stylesheets for individual pages.

I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
pages could be a cumbersome task.

What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.

I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
page and make finding style references much easier, too.

It seems like the best way to go, but I want to make sure I'm not
creating a problem with the technique with which I'm unaware.

I can easily specify which particular page's stylesheet is called
by using coldfusion and the cgi.script_name variable.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

Rick
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1285 - Release Date: 18/02/2008 5:50
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1285 - Release Date: 18/02/2008 5:50
 
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-20 Thread Rafael
Rafael wrote:
 Chris Broadfoot wrote:
 Rafael wrote:
 Having separate style sheets usually helps to keep everything 
 organized (depending on how you build them), but it also gives you 
 more connections to the server. So what you can do is to make use of 
 that server-side language you have, just make sure to send the 
 appropriate HTTP headers. I.e:
   In the (x)HTML page:
 link rel=stylesheet type=text/css 
 href=css.dynamic.xxx/common/web /
   In css.dynamic.xxx, something like
 - split path-info by '/'
 - check by matching against the available files
 - send headers and embed all the files into one

 I personally don't like this idea. You have no benefit from caching 
 and might as well include all those styles in an inline style tag.
I don't understand you, You have no benefit from caching? As far 
as I know, caching is better than having the browser download the same 
content over and over again. If you meant that such benefit is not 
present here, you're wrong, it is, that's what the Last-Modified header 
is for ---It still opens a connection though, since it has to check 
what's the last modification date.

and might as well include all those styles in an inline style 
tag. Well, yes. Having a server-side script to build the CSS file will 
allow you to use that content in any way you want, including putting it 
in a style tag (I'll assume inline is a typo). Now, why would you want 
that...? If we're talking about a potentially large file, I doubt you'll 
ever want to add that to every file you send to your users, would you?.

 I think styles for each page is inherently bad, your styles across 
 the site should be consistent, therefore you shouldn't /need/ a large 
 amount of specific styles for pages.
We don't know what are the specifics of this case, so we can't 
decide that (IMO). Also, having a consistent style across the site 
doesn't necessarily mean having a small file.

I hope you can see my point: I can't see yours.

 Regards,
 Chris
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Rick Faircloth
Hi, all.

I'd like to know your thoughts on including separate
stylesheets for individual pages.

I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
pages could be a cumbersome task.

What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.

I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
page and make finding style references much easier, too.

It seems like the best way to go, but I want to make sure I'm not
creating a problem with the technique with which I'm unaware.

I can easily specify which particular page's stylesheet is called
by using coldfusion and the cgi.script_name variable.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

Rick
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Rob Emenecker
 I'd like to know your thoughts on including separate stylesheets for
individual pages.

Personally I do prefer what you are suggesting Rick.

I have a few large sites that have subdomains, where the subdomains have
individual differences from the main site's styles, but that must maintain
some level of consistency. Rather than create a whole cluster of classes and
ID's specific to the subdomain I simply use a supplemental style-sheet for
subdomain-specific modifications. This keeps the main style sheet clean and
uncluttered, and also allows the owners of the subdomains to utilize the
same tagging scheme (classes, ids, etc.) as the site as a whole.

...Rob
 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Jason Crosse
On 18/02/2008 16:09, Rick Faircloth wrote:
 I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
 Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
 very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
 pages could be a cumbersome task.
 
 What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
 having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
 E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
 For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.
 
 I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
 page and make finding style references much easier, too.

You could take the modular approach. Instead of creating stylesheets 
for individual pages, you could, for example have

* common.css
* web.css
* intranet.css

Having individual style files for individual pages seems worse than 
embedding styles in the head of a document. It seems to me you've 
got all the disadvantages plus extra calls to the server.

-- 
http://antanova.blogspot.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Jake Churchill
I'd set an ID in the body tag for each individual page and divide up your
CSS based on that.  body id=index, body id=common, etc.

Then you've got 

#index ... {
}

#common ... {

}

I do a lot of work with a product called Farcry which is a content
management system and this is how I change styles on a per-page basis.

_ 

Jake Churchill 
Team Leader
11204 Davenport, Ste. 100
Omaha, NE  68154 
http://www.cfwebtools.com 
402-408-3733 x103 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Crosse
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:27 AM
To: 'CSS Discussion'
Subject: Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

On 18/02/2008 16:09, Rick Faircloth wrote:
 I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
 Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
 very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
 pages could be a cumbersome task.
 
 What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
 having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
 E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
 For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.
 
 I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
 page and make finding style references much easier, too.

You could take the modular approach. Instead of creating stylesheets 
for individual pages, you could, for example have

* common.css
* web.css
* intranet.css

Having individual style files for individual pages seems worse than 
embedding styles in the head of a document. It seems to me you've 
got all the disadvantages plus extra calls to the server.

-- 
http://antanova.blogspot.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date: 2/17/2008
2:39 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date: 2/17/2008
2:39 PM
 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:36:11 -0600
Jake Churchill wrote:

 I'd set an ID in the body tag for each individual page and divide up
 your CSS based on that.  body id=index, body id=common, etc.
 
 Then you've got 
 
 #index ... {
 }
 
 #common ... {
 
 }
 
 I do a lot of work with a product called Farcry which is a content
 management system and this is how I change styles on a per-page basis.
 

This just feels like a cludge necessary only because of the restrictions
of your CMS.

-- 
Michael

All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall
be well

 - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Mark Story
Rick Faircloth wrote:
 Hi, all.

 I'd like to know your thoughts on including separate
 stylesheets for individual pages.

 I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
 Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
 very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
 pages could be a cumbersome task.

 What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
 having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
 E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
 For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.

 I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
 page and make finding style references much easier, too.

 It seems like the best way to go, but I want to make sure I'm not
 creating a problem with the technique with which I'm unaware.

 I can easily specify which particular page's stylesheet is called
 by using coldfusion and the cgi.script_name variable.

 Thoughts?

 Thanks,

 Rick
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Rick,

I think this is an allright solution. However, you might end up 
repeating yourself if you are not careful in delegating styles to the 
main sheet.  As long as you can stay vigilant on pushing shared classes 
to the shared sheets, you'll be fine.  Otherwise you can end up with 
spaghetti styles with the same class/id defined 3 different ways on 3 
different sheets.  Personally I divide my sheets by section.  So for a 
CMS all the styles related to each type of content are on a single 
sheet.  If anything ends up on more than one sheet it goes into the 
common sheet.

-Mark


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Rick Faircloth
 However, you might end up
 repeating yourself if you are not careful

Very true!  Thanks, Mark!

Rick

 
 Rick,
 
 I think this is an allright solution. However, you might end up
 repeating yourself if you are not careful in delegating styles to the
 main sheet.  As long as you can stay vigilant on pushing shared classes
 to the shared sheets, you'll be fine.  Otherwise you can end up with
 spaghetti styles with the same class/id defined 3 different ways on 3
 different sheets.  Personally I divide my sheets by section.  So for a
 CMS all the styles related to each type of content are on a single
 sheet.  If anything ends up on more than one sheet it goes into the
 common sheet.
 
 -Mark



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Jake Churchill
On the contrary, this is a particularly nice feature when it comes to
multiple skins.  I can create completely different look and feels with only
a change to an ID, thus allowing the user to completely change the layout of
the site without my intervention.

_ 

Jake Churchill 
Team Leader
11204 Davenport, Ste. 100
Omaha, NE  68154 
http://www.cfwebtools.com 
402-408-3733 x103 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Adams
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 2:13 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:36:11 -0600
Jake Churchill wrote:

 I'd set an ID in the body tag for each individual page and divide up
 your CSS based on that.  body id=index, body id=common, etc.
 
 Then you've got 
 
 #index ... {
 }
 
 #common ... {
 
 }
 
 I do a lot of work with a product called Farcry which is a content
 management system and this is how I change styles on a per-page basis.
 

This just feels like a cludge necessary only because of the restrictions
of your CMS.

-- 
Michael

All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall
be well

 - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date: 2/17/2008
2:39 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date: 2/17/2008
2:39 PM
 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Rafael
Jason Crosse wrote:
 On 18/02/2008 16:09, Rick Faircloth wrote:
   
 I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
 Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
 very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
 pages could be a cumbersome task.

 What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
 having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
 E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
 For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.

 I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
 page and make finding style references much easier, too.
 

 You could take the modular approach. Instead of creating stylesheets 
 for individual pages, you could, for example have

 * common.css
 * web.css
 * intranet.css

 Having individual style files for individual pages seems worse than 
 embedding styles in the head of a document. It seems to me you've 
 got all the disadvantages plus extra calls to the server.
   
This may be a slightly off-topic thread, but in the meanwhile...
If you are concerned about performance you should combine 
everything, even more if you have a server-side language at your 
disposition. So what I mean is a little bit more of a complex solution...

Having separate style sheets usually helps to keep everything 
organized (depending on how you build them), but it also gives you more 
connections to the server. So what you can do is to make use of that 
server-side language you have, just make sure to send the appropriate 
HTTP headers. I.e:
  In the (x)HTML page:
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css 
href=css.dynamic.xxx/common/web /
  In css.dynamic.xxx, something like
- split path-info by '/'
- check by matching against the available files
- send headers and embed all the files into one

off-topic
I haven't used Cold Fusion, but in PHP (css.dynamic.php) it would be 
something like this...
  [[ /illustrative code only/ ]]
ob_start('ob_gzhandler');
ob_implicit_flush(FALSE);
header('Content-Type: text/css');
   
$available_css = array( 'common', 'web', 'intranet' );
$css_files = explode('/', @$_SERVER['ORIG_PATH_INFO']);
$css_files = array_intersect($css_files, $available_css);
$num_css_files = count($css_files);
   
$last = time();
for ( $i = 0;  $i  $num_css_files;  $i ++ ) {
   $file  = some/path/{$css_files[$i]}.css;
   $stamp = filemtime($file);
   if ( 0 == $i || $stamp  $last ) {
  $last = $stamp;
   }
   echo  \n\n/* , ucfirst($css_files[$i]),  */\n\n;
   readfile($file);
}
header('Last-Modified: '. gmdate('D, d M Y H:i:s \G\M\T', $last));
ob_end_flush();
/off-topic

Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Request for Comments on this CSS Stylesheet Approach

2008-02-18 Thread Chris Broadfoot
Rafael wrote:
 Jason Crosse wrote:
 On 18/02/2008 16:09, Rick Faircloth wrote:
   
 I've realized at the start of a pretty large site, including
 Internet and Intranet sections, that my stylesheet could grow
 very large and even finding sections of styles for particular
 pages could be a cumbersome task.

 What I'm considering is having one main stylesheet, then
 having supplemental stylesheet for the various pages I will create.
 E.g., for a particular page, I would have main.css, plus index.css.
 For announcements, I would have main.css, plus announcements.css.

 I would be avoiding loading a lot of irrelevant styles for a particular
 page and make finding style references much easier, too.
 
 You could take the modular approach. Instead of creating stylesheets 
 for individual pages, you could, for example have

 * common.css
 * web.css
 * intranet.css

 Having individual style files for individual pages seems worse than 
 embedding styles in the head of a document. It seems to me you've 
 got all the disadvantages plus extra calls to the server.
   
 This may be a slightly off-topic thread, but in the meanwhile...
 If you are concerned about performance you should combine 
 everything, even more if you have a server-side language at your 
 disposition. So what I mean is a little bit more of a complex solution...
 
 Having separate style sheets usually helps to keep everything 
 organized (depending on how you build them), but it also gives you more 
 connections to the server. So what you can do is to make use of that 
 server-side language you have, just make sure to send the appropriate 
 HTTP headers. I.e:
   In the (x)HTML page:
 link rel=stylesheet type=text/css 
 href=css.dynamic.xxx/common/web /
   In css.dynamic.xxx, something like
 - split path-info by '/'
 - check by matching against the available files
 - send headers and embed all the files into one

I personally don't like this idea. You have no benefit from caching and 
might as well include all those styles in an inline style tag.

I think styles for each page is inherently bad, your styles across the 
site should be consistent, therefore you shouldn't /need/ a large amount 
of specific styles for pages.

Regards,
Chris
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/