Re: using IA32 chroot: Exec format error
Oh, one more issue related to IA32 chroot'ing. When I run 'dchroot -c ia32 -d openoffice' like suggested in the FAQ, I get $ dchroot -c ia32 -d openoffice (ia32) openoffice dchroot: chdir: No such file or directory dchroot: Child exited non-zero. dchroot: Operation failed. What could be wrong? Thanks, Max Max wrote: Alex, that's it!!! Thank you for your right guess! This needs to be added to FAQ. Now I've got chroot'ing as well as direct running some ia32 binaries to work. Max Alex Perry wrote: Max, everything you write is consistent with having a kernel that does not have 32 bit emulation available. Could you please check your config file for the status of the symbol CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION in your running kernel ? The quick way to try, which may not work, is zgrep CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION /proc/config.gz Max wrote: Hello! I'm having troubles using IA32 applications under debian-amd64. First, I installed ia32-libs with apt-get. I noticed that ia32-libs description/docs do not mention 'chroot' at all but claim that ia32 Linux applications can be executed on 64-bit systems. So I hoped that I would be able just run ia32 binaries as promised. But in reality I got cannot execute binary file errors. Next I tried to get into ia32 enviroment with `chroot /emul/ia32-linux/' command but it didn't work saying that '/bin/bash' is missing. I checked ia32-libs package and indeed it did not provide '/bin/bash'. I decided to follow FAQ with debootstrap'ing. So I run debootstrap --arch i386 sid /emul/ia32-linux/ ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian It did a lot of checking/installing/validating/extracting but finally ended up with the following chroot: cannot run command `mount': Exec format error W: Failure trying to run: chroot /emul/ia32-linux mount -t proc proc /proc umount: /emul/ia32-linux/dev/pts: not found umount: /emul/ia32-linux/dev/shm: not found umount: /emul/ia32-linux/proc/bus/usb: not found umount: /emul/ia32-linux/proc: not mounted So debootstrap installed a lot of IA32 stuff including '/bin/bash' but that stuff still does not work. In particular, chroot'ing now reports # chroot /emul/ia32-linux/ chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': Exec format error The same error appears on attempts to run any other application with 'dchroot'. At the same time 'file /emul/ia32-linux/bin/bash' reports /emul/ia32-linux/bin/bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped which looks OK to me. So I got stuck. Please advise. Thanks, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: using IA32 chroot: Exec format error
Max wrote: dchroot: Child exited non-zero. dchroot: Operation failed. What could be wrong? It looks like a hospital invervention went horribly wrong, and I can only hope the child will recover from this. During surgery, the child for some reason was too excited, the doctor's knife may have slipped, and the operation failed. It's hard to tell exactly what went wrong without more details. Alternatively, it could just be a permissions issue -- the user's home directory must be mounted in /etc/fstab along these lines: /home/ilona /var/chroot/sid-ia32/home/ilona none bind 0 0 Otherwise openoffice can't write to the .openoffice for that user. Cheers, Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where to find ?
BHUSHAN KULKARNI wrote: Hi Debian/AMD64 Lovers , Where to find jigdo files for pure64 ? Or how to download pure 64. -- --- Start here: http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html There are CD image files for the Debian-amd64 Installer ready to burn here: http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ I think the jigdo for Debian-amd64 is still in planning. The recent Installers are now very easy to use and without difficulty in many cases. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR ASUS A8V Deluxe ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256 Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2 Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid Kernel 2.6.11 XFree86 4.3.0.1 Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I install desktops like Gnome from NET inst?
I will shortly be trying to install Debian 64 onto a dual-opteron machine. I also want to install support for an Nvidia graphics card and the Gnome desktop. I've seen instructions here about handling the NVidia graphics. What I don't understand so far is whether the netinst CD downloads the necessary files for nvidia support and (optionally) the Gnome (or KDE) desktop. Does the net install CD only install the kernel/progs/IA32 chroot etc and leave you to install anything further such as workstation desktop etc? -- Rupert Heesom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which version of AMD64 install?
I've looked through the mailing list and HOWTO, found some info re what the different versions of AMD64 do, but I'm still a little confused about which one (if any) is right for me. My needs are: Installing onto dual Opteron machine, used as server workstation Would like to run 64bit if possible. Will need to run IA32 chroot environment as well. Workstation usability more an issue than security. It seems to me that it doesn't matter which version: Sarge, SID, GCCxx I use. I remember reading that the net install CD for sarge and SID are now the same thing? What is the gcc version compared to the others? IE I know that gcc compiler 3.x and 4.0 are used, but that don't mean much to me. What gcc version does sarge SID use? -- Rupert Heesom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alioth repo broken?
Hi, This morning I tried to do an apt-get update and got several errors on package files from Alioth: carrington:~# apt-get update Hit ftp://ftp.gwdg.de sid/non-free Packages Hit ftp://ftp.gwdg.de sid/non-free Release Get:1 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Packages [3138kB] Hit http://cyberspace.ucla.edu unstable/main Packages Hit http://cyberspace.ucla.edu unstable/main Release Hit ftp://ftp.nerim.net unstable/main Packages Hit ftp://ftp.nerim.net unstable/main Release Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Release Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/contrib Packages Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/contrib Release Get:2 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/non-free Packages [49.2kB] Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/non-free Release 99% [1 Packages gzip 5849088] 164kB/s 0s gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file Err http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Packages Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) 99% [2 Packages gzip 0] 164kB/s 0s gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file Err http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/non-free Packages Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) Fetched 3187kB in 20s (159kB/s) Failed to fetch http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64/dists/sarge/ main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) Failed to fetch http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64/dists/sarge/ non-free/binary-amd64/Packages.gz Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) Reading Package Lists... Done W: Couldn't stat source package list http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge /main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org_debian-pure64_ dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge /non-free Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org_debian-pur e64_dists_sarge_non-free_binary-amd64_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or direct ory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. I've tried to do this a few times over the past hour or so and every time it came up the same. Is the disk full again perhaps? regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New ATI fglrx drivers work with AMD64
Manuel, These MTRR errors are the reason why direct rendering does not work. I've just faced a similar problem. Hopefully, in my Tyan Tiger K8W S2875 BIOS setup there is an option MTRR Mapping which can be either Continuous or Discrete. The former explicitly describes the PCI hole as non-cacheable while the latter leaves the PCI hole below the 4G boundary undescribed. Continuous is default. All MTRR errors and fglrx direct rendering ability had been fixed when I switched MTRR Mapping to Discrete. You can see the current MTRR state with 'cat /proc/mtrr'. This is how my MTRR looked with Continuous mapping: reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0x1 (4096MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1 reg02: base=0xc000 (3072MB), size=1024MB: uncachable, count=1 this was problematic And how they look now: reg00: base=0x1 (4096MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0x ( 0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1 reg02: base=0x8000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1 reg03: base=0xe000 (3584MB), size= 128MB: write-combining, count=1 reg04: base=0xf000 (3840MB), size= 128MB: write-combining, count=1 I guess that two 128Mb regions are video card memory and AGP aperture. Max Manuel Capinha wrote: Small add-on: My problem is somewhere in the kernel module, it seems: (from dmesg) [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.8.25 [Jan 14 2005] on minor 0 Fire GL built-in AGP-support Based on agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 941M agpgart: Detected AMD 8151 chipset agpgart: AGP aperture is 32M @ 0x400 Power management callback for AGP chipset installed [fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x1f000b7b (hardware caps of chipset) mtrr: type mismatch for 400,200 old: write-back new: write-combining [fglrx:firegl_unlock] *ERROR* Process 25297 using kernel context 0 PID 25297 is my X server. So, is anyone else seeing this ? I've got no clue about that error message :/ Thanks once again, Manuel On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +, Manuel Capinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got it to install and I can now boot X using ATI's proprietary drivers, but I got no OpenGL support. Running glxgears gives me around 60 fps, so I know that's being done in software! Looking in /var/log/XFree86.0.log I found this: (II) fglrx(0): Kernel Module Version Information: (II) fglrx(0): Name: fglrx (II) fglrx(0): Version: 8.8.25 (II) fglrx(0): Date: Jan 14 2005 (II) fglrx(0): Desc: ATI FireGL DRM kernel module (II) fglrx(0): Kernel Module version matches driver. (II) fglrx(0): Kernel Module Build Time Information: (II) fglrx(0): Build-Kernel UTS_RELEASE:2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp (II) fglrx(0): Build-Kernel MODVERSIONS:no (II) fglrx(0): Build-Kernel __SMP__:no (II) fglrx(0): Build-Kernel PAGE_SIZE: 0x1000 (II) fglrx(0): [drm] register handle = 0xff5f (EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error xf86_EINVAL (EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP (II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) fglrx(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xff41d000 at 0x2a955da000 (WW) fglrx(0): *** (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! * (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) * (WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) * (WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available* (WW) fglrx(0): * * Is anyone else seeing this or does everyone else but my have OpenGL by hardware ? TIA, Manuel On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:10:46 +0100, Filippo Carone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Lorenzo Milesi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto: Hi, I'd just like to give the list a heads up that the new ATI fglrx drivers actually work with amd64. They're only available (as usual) in rpm's but I hacked together Flavio's debian packages and with a bit of manual copying around it works. Can you tell me how did you do it? I tried just alien-ing the rpm but fails because it tries to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2', owned by xlibmesa-gl package. use the --force-overwrite switch of dpkg. cheers, fc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More ooo/chroot problems
Sorry to have to add to the large number of entries on this subject. I have pure64 running very smoothly on an Asus K8V-X motherboard with a 3400 processor. It has been acting as a cups print server for a usb printer for the rest of my network. A couple of days ago I felt the need to try to get openoffice going with the chroot process described in the amd64 howto. All seems to be going quite well; when I type oowriter in a shell, an oowriter window comes up, complete with icons on the toolbars and a default frame. Unfortunately it doesn't display any fonts in the frame or windows. Should I have an XF86Config-4 in the chroot, to set font paths? My limited understanding suggested that would be the job of X running outside the chroot. I have downloaded and installed only the packages suggested in the Howto. I suppose I could use rdesktop or nx to access openoffice on a 386 machine running sarge a metre away, but it would be nice to be migrating to the AMD 64 machine for most of my desktop work. I'm sure I should have given more information but I'm not sure what Suggestions? Angus Mackenzie, currently suffering from aclueia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I install desktops like Gnome from NET inst?
Rupert Heesom writes: I will shortly be trying to install Debian 64 onto a dual-opteron machine. I also want to install support for an Nvidia graphics card and the Gnome desktop. I've seen instructions here about handling the NVidia graphics. What I don't understand so far is whether the netinst CD downloads the necessary files for nvidia support and (optionally) the Gnome (or KDE) desktop. Does the net install CD only install the kernel/progs/IA32 chroot etc and leave you to install anything further such as workstation desktop etc? +++ Hi, I have used the netinst CD several times recently. I would recommend just getting the base system installed first and then working on the many options after the netinst is done. The first step after booting the netinst CD and getting the partitions and network configured and a small part of the CD packages installed is the reboot. Remove the CD as instructed and then reboot to finish the basic Debian. The Installer will continue after rebooting without the CD and begin to download many additional packages from the internet until the Debian can function at a minimal level. The very last step is to either install optional packages or quit and install them later. The options include a choice called the Desktop and I think that installs Gnome. There are also options for File Server, DNS Server and also a choice of Manual Package Selection. Or you can make no choice and just finish. Then everything is ready to be customized in any way imaginable at any time thereafter. Have fun. The installer worries about everything else. P.S The sid gcc is version 3.3.5 and I think sarge is the same. I have both sid and sarge installed. Use the matching netinst as you choose. The real choice is pure64 == sid or debian-pure64 == sarge. Even pure64 for sarge will turn out to be sid. That is just trivia. Sid is a good distribution anyway. Edit the sources.list during installation as you choose: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR ASUS A8V Deluxe ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256 Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2 Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid Kernel 2.6.11 XFree86 4.3.0.1 Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
minor update to K8 Mainboards list
Please add the following info to K8 Mainboards Linux compatibility list: MSI K8T Master2-FAR Sound: via82xx Tyan Tiger K8W S2875ANRFSound: i810_audio btw, FAQ still refers to cross-compilation of 64bit kernel within 32bit enviroment. But the relevant section at the bottom of this document seemed to have magically disappeared. Has this section been intentionally removed or what? Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alioth repo broken?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:25:38PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote: I've tried to do this a few times over the past hour or so and every time it came up the same. Is the disk full again perhaps? The disk was full again yes? Do you still have the problem? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alioth repo broken?
On 13 Mar 2005, 13:25, T.J. Zeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This morning I tried to do an apt-get update and got several errors on package files from Alioth: Same here, getting package files from one of the mirror. It happened on 'testing' files, though. :( -- @,@ Il corpo del povero cadrebbe subito in pezzi [`-'] se non fosse legato ben stretto dal filo dei sogni -----Anonimo indiano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NuSphere free for Linux
Hello, has anyone NuSphere free evaluation copy for Linux running. Allways get the error: You should have these libraries installed: /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 but i think they are installed -- Gruss Hans-Joachim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alioth repo broken?
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 13:49 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:25:38PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote: I've tried to do this a few times over the past hour or so and every time it came up the same. Is the disk full again perhaps? The disk was full again yes? Do you still have the problem? Yes, the problem is still there. Tried just a minute ago. regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New ATI fglrx drivers work with AMD64
Jan, I did the same things except that I copied fglrx32 libraries from the actual debian-i386 installation and used 'apt-get install' within chroot for the rest required packages (e.g., xlibs etc.). I also mounted tmpfs from within chroot (not from outside like you did) with the command 'mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /dev/shm'. And now DOOM 3 runs under my debian-amd64!!! Speed is not worse than under debian-i386. There are still some problems though that require further investigation. In particular, it hang up when I tried to load a saved game. Anyway it's a good start ;) Regards, Max Jan Kreuzer wrote: Hi here is a qucik description how i got the new fglrx working in 64-bit and 32-bit chroot: 1)Installed a chroot as stated in https://alioth.debian.org/docman/vi...o.html#id274243 2) used alien to convert the driver to a tgz and upacked them to a temp directory 3) copied the contents of (driverdir)/usr/X11R6/lib64 to /usr/X11R6/lib64 4) copied the contents of (driverdir)/usr/X11R6/lib into my chroot (/var/chroot/sid-ia32/usr/X11R6) 5) build the kernel module 6) did a mount -o bind /dev /var/chroot/sid-ia32/dev and a mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /var/chroot/sid-ia32/dev/shm to make the 32-bit component of the driver happy 7) fired up X, tested glxinfo = ok, tested glxinfo32 (fromchroot) = ok 8) fired up nwn = ok 9) fired up doom3 = crash :( Maybe this helps P.S.: Please CC me, as i am not on the list (only reading through archives) Cheers Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kaboodle in pure64 broken?
Hi, could it be, that kaboodle in pure64 (sarge) is broken? When I start trying to view an mpeg or something else (like from leech.dk), kaboodle only starts, but does not play. When I push play-button, it breaks with a sigsev (KDE-crash-notifier). Under 32bit sarge the same video-file works fine. Asus A8V Deluxe, NVidia 6600GT, 1GB RAM. Any hints? ciao, Dirk -- | Akkuschrauber Kaufberatung and AEG GSM stuff | | Visit my homepage: http://www.nutrimatic.ping.de/ | | FIDO: Dirk Salva 2:244/6305.10 Internet: dsalvaATgmx.de | |The Ruhrgebiet, best place to live in Germany! | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where to find ?
On (13/03/05 12:49), Bhushan Kulkarni wrote: Hi Debian/AMD64 Lovers , Where to find jigdo files for pure64 ? Or how to download pure 64. with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Follow this: https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id220463 Have fun ;) Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alioth repo broken?
T.J. Zeeman wrote: Hi, This morning I tried to do an apt-get update and got several errors on package files from Alioth: If you need a mirror: http://mirror.ohiolinux.net/pub/mirror/debian-alioth/ David -- David J. Coulson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.davidcoulson.net/ phone: (216) 920-3100 / (216) 258-4942 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exec: 426: chroot: not found
Hello Everyone, My first upgrade on my pure-64 has just bitten the dust. I did not change the kernel which was installed in December 2004. ran apt-get update Using Synaptic, I did the update in batches, upgrading the things that I use most first. The package that failed was adduser, while trying to remove some files and directories that did not exist. I re-ran the update and it complained that there were files that could not be found (in the archive). Close Synaptic and could not run anything, including shutdown. At reboot: ... my disks get mounted ... EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode exec: 426: chroot: not found Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Google was not my friend here and I cannot find this error in the archives. Your help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks * Lourens Steenkamp Enjoying Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r2 * Here is bigger than you can imagine, Now is forever ... Bruce Cockburn : Messenger Wind -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: exec: 426: chroot: not found
Lourens replying to Lourens Steenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone, My first upgrade on my pure-64 has just bitten the dust. I did not change the kernel which was installed in December 2004. ran apt-get update Using Synaptic, I did the update in batches, upgrading the things that I use most first. The package that failed was adduser, while trying to remove some files and directories that did not exist. I re-ran the update and it complained that there were files that could not be found(in the archive). Close Synaptic and could not run anything, including shutdown. At reboot: ... my disks get mounted ... EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode exec: 426: chroot: not found Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Google was not my friend here and I cannot find this error in the archives. Your help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Some more info: /lib ld-2.3.2.so is unchanged (dd 14 Oct) ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 - ld-2.3.2.so ld-linux.so.2 - /emul/i32-linux/lib/ld-linux.so.2 They seem fine to me?? Thanks * Lourens Steenkamp Enjoying Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r2 * Here is bigger than you can imagine, Now is forever ... Bruce Cockburn : Messenger Wind -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Lourens Steenkamp Enjoying Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r2 * Here is bigger than you can imagine, Now is forever ... Bruce Cockburn : Messenger Wind -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More ooo/chroot problems - solved
My ia-32 chroot version of openoffice ran but had no fonts in the window Lucien Saviot suggested I installed ttf-bitstream-vera in the chroot That plus its dependencies solved the problem; ooo now seems to perform perfectly. Angus Mackenzie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another program for burning dvds
Since I tried to burnt 5 dvds with k3b (it's very unstable, maybe developers should focus on bugs instead on new features??) and none of them is being read by any of the readers I tried I ask for another program to burn my dvds (not dvd movie). The output of dmesg with the dvd I burned in the drive is: attempt to access beyond end of device hda: rw=0, want=68, limit=4 isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=hda, iso_blknum=16, block=16 -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel: 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Mail: Thunderbird Chat: Kopete (ICQ) 150487234 Put the fan back into computing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Another program for burning dvds
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:17:14 +0100, v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I tried to burnt 5 dvds with k3b (it's very unstable, maybe developers should focus on bugs instead on new features??) and none of them is being read by any of the readers I tried I ask for another program to burn my dvds (not dvd movie). I use xcdroast. Try it - you'll like it. Regards, Ozz. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
I use xcdroast. Try it - you'll like it. Completely coincidentally, I actually installed this this morning, but I've been having issues. 1. It keeps saying that I need to install ProDVD support before I can write DVDs. Now, I can find the cdrecord-prodvd source (I think), but is there a package for it somewhere? 2. Even though I've enabled scsi emulation on my DVD drive (added hdd=ide-scsi to my grub kernel line, and have had to change the mountpoint of /media/cdrom1 to /dev/scd1), when I select [3,0,0] from the Device-Scan part of the XCDroast setup, it says that I've selected an ATAPI device as my CD writer. There is an ATAPI version of my DVD drive about, but I don't select it! Curses. Any suggestions? Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lm-sensors and Abit AV8
Hi! Anybody running an Abit AV8 motherboard, and got the lm-sensors running? I cannot see the cpu temperatures, but the voltages are ok. I get -1, so I guess SOMETHING is there.. My BIOS version is 1.7, and there is a 1.8 without anything in the changelog about this.. but if I need to upgrade, I guess I have to find a way to get the stuff on a dos-floppy.. This is my system: trillian:~# lsmod | head -7 Module Size Used by w83627hf 32288 0 eeprom 9112 0 i2c_sensor 3968 2 w83627hf,eeprom i2c_isa 2688 0 i2c_viapro 8460 0 i2c_core 24856 5 w83627hf,eeprom,i2c_sensor,i2c_isa,i2c_viapro trillian:~# uname -a Linux trillian 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 #1 Wed Feb 9 22:29:16 CET 2005 x86_64 GNU/Linux trillian:~# sensors w83627hf-isa-0290 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +4.08 V (min = +4.08 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM (beep) VCore 2: +4.08 V (min = +4.08 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM (beep) +3.3V: +4.08 V (min = +4.08 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM (beep) +5V: +6.85 V (min = +6.85 V, max = +6.85 V) ALARM (beep) +12V: +15.50 V (min = +15.50 V, max = +15.50 V) ALARM (beep) -12V: +6.06 V (min = +6.06 V, max = +6.06 V) ALARM (beep) -5V: +5.10 V (min = +5.10 V, max = +5.10 V) ALARM (beep) V5SB: +6.85 V (min = +6.85 V, max = +6.85 V) ALARM (beep) VBat: +4.08 V (min = +4.08 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM (beep) fan1:0 RPM (min =0 RPM, div = 128) ALARM (beep) fan2:0 RPM (min =0 RPM, div = 128) ALARM (beep) fan3:0 RPM (min =0 RPM, div = 128) ALARM (beep) temp1:-1 C (high =-1 C, hyst =-1 C) sensor = diode ALARM (beep) temp2: +0.0 C (high =+0 C, hyst =+0 C) sensor = diode ALARM (beep) temp3: +0.0 C (high =+0 C, hyst =+0 C) sensor = diode ALARM (beep) vid: +0.000 V (VRM Version 0.0) alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM beep_enable: Sound alarm enabled eeprom-i2c-0-52 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Memory type:DDR SDRAM DIMM Memory size (MB): 512 eeprom-i2c-0-50 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Memory type:DDR SDRAM DIMM Memory size (MB): 512 /n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
2. Even though I've enabled scsi emulation on my DVD drive (added hdd=ide-scsi to my grub kernel line, and have had to change the mountpoint of /media/cdrom1 to /dev/scd1), when I select [3,0,0] from the Device-Scan part of the XCDroast setup, it says that I've selected an ATAPI device as my CD writer. There is an ATAPI version of my DVD drive about, but I don't select it! Curses. Any suggestions? Actually, belay request for help with point 2: it is of course done in the CD Settings tab. Still need help with ProDVD.. Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 07:53:50PM +, Max Dyckhoff wrote: 1. It keeps saying that I need to install ProDVD support before I can write DVDs. Now, I can find the cdrecord-prodvd source (I think), but is there a package for it somewhere? Try http://www.xcdroast.org/manual/dvd.html There is no debian package. I think it's because of the license and there is no source code included. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian chroot on Ubuntu?
I'm getting ready to install a 32 bit chroot on an Ubuntu AMD64 install. Do I need to stick with a 32 bit Ubuntu distro or can I go with a 32 bit Debian chroot? thanks, hank -- Beautiful Sunny Winfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
Austin (Ozz) Denyer wrote: On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:17:14 +0100, v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I tried to burnt 5 dvds with k3b (it's very unstable, maybe developers should focus on bugs instead on new features??) and none of them is being read by any of the readers I tried I ask for another program to burn my dvds (not dvd movie). I use xcdroast. Please, can you tell me where you found amd64 binaries of cdrecord.prodvd? I can download it from ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/ but there is only an obsolete version and xcdroast says: ** WARNING **: Invalid cdrecord-ProDVD version 2.01-pre found. Expecting at least version 2.01a11 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) Thanks -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel: 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Mail: Thunderbird Chat: Kopete (ICQ) 150487234 Put the fan back into computing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Another program for burning dvds
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:47:11PM +0100, v0n0 wrote: Please, can you tell me where you found amd64 binaries of cdrecord.prodvd? I can download it from ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/ but there is only an obsolete version and xcdroast says: ** WARNING **: Invalid cdrecord-ProDVD version 2.01-pre found. Expecting at least version 2.01a11 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) I chose to ignore it because the 2.01a11 version is older than 2.01-pre-x86_64. Haven't tested it yet though. Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
On 13 Mar 2005, 21:47, v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, can you tell me where you found amd64 binaries of cdrecord.prodvd? I can download it from ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/ but there is only an obsolete version and xcdroast says: ** WARNING **: Invalid cdrecord-ProDVD version 2.01-pre found. Expecting at least version 2.01a11 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) Same here. And, for the moment, I run xcdroast with -n option... -- @,@ Il corpo del povero cadrebbe subito in pezzi [`-'] se non fosse legato ben stretto dal filo dei sogni -----Anonimo indiano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
/usr/share/doc/cdrecord/README.DVD.Debian describes four official ways to burn DVD under Debian. Personally, I like the last one with patched cdrecord which is to be manually compiled. There are simple instructions for that. But to get the job done you may need to additionally install the following packages: dpatch autotools-dev smake Good luck! Max v0n0 wrote: Since I tried to burnt 5 dvds with k3b (it's very unstable, maybe developers should focus on bugs instead on new features??) and none of them is being read by any of the readers I tried I ask for another program to burn my dvds (not dvd movie). The output of dmesg with the dvd I burned in the drive is: attempt to access beyond end of device hda: rw=0, want=68, limit=4 isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=hda, iso_blknum=16, block=16 -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel: 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Mail: Thunderbird Chat: Kopete (ICQ) 150487234 Put the fan back into computing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
transcode 64 bit?
Hello, I use the Debian pure64 bit now quite a long time, and i`m very happy with it. The only thing i'm missing is transcode. Are there any 64bit package of this program? Thank you for your help! Greeting Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net join memory problems
When I try to run net join to get samba to talk to the domain controller I get a bunch error messages about being out of memory and killing process. The same samba configuration works fine on other machines with the regular version of Sarge. Has anyone else come across this kind of problem with Samba and AMD64 or has anyone been able to successfully join a domain with AMD64? -- scribles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: transcode 64 bit?
http://hpisi.nerim.net/ has a bunch of video related packages including 64bit versions of most. I think transcode is included in that, but i'm not 100% sure. -- scribles [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 23:56 +0100, Michael wrote: Hello, I use the Debian pure64 bit now quite a long time, and i`m very happy with it. The only thing i'm missing is transcode. Are there any 64bit package of this program? Thank you for your help! Greeting Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
transcode 64 bit
yes, i found transcode there. Thank you! Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: transcode 64 bit?
Michael wrote: Hello, I use the Debian pure64 bit now quite a long time, and i`m very happy with it. The only thing i'm missing is transcode. Are there any 64bit package of this program? Thank you for your help! Greeting Michael http://debian.video.free.fr/ has a list of apt-mirrors for this stuff. Transcode is between these. /Jacob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: transcode 64 bit
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 00:28 +0100, Michael wrote: yes, i found transcode there. Ummm, can you be a bit more specific? -- - Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. Can government really be active and, at the same time, limited? History suggests otherwise. Lew Rockwell signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: lm-sensors and Abit AV8
Niklas Ögren wrote: Hi! Anybody running an Abit AV8 motherboard, and got the lm-sensors running? I cannot see the cpu temperatures, but the voltages are ok. I get -1, so I guess SOMETHING is there.. My BIOS version is 1.7, and there is a 1.8 without anything in the changelog about this.. but if I need to upgrade, I guess I have to find a way to get the stuff on a dos-floppy.. Quoting lm-sensors.nu about Abit uGuru: (2004-09-14) Actually a Winbond W83L950D in disguise (despite Abit claiming it is a new microprocessor designed by the ABIT Engineers) with many Abit-specific additions. A driver was requested by several users but no datasheet is available from Abit, so we cannot help. We do not support undocumented chips. Lately, fewer and fewer chips seem to work with lm-sensors, in addition to all recent Abit boards, I didn't have any luck with two recent Asus boards either. Can't blame the lm-sensors developers though. What I can't really figure is the reason of the motherboard manufacturers to keep such simple things so secretive. -Kyuu 'Vekotin' Eturautti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian chroot on Ubuntu?
Hank writes: I'm getting ready to install a 32 bit chroot on an Ubuntu AMD64 install. Do I need to stick with a 32 bit Ubuntu distro or can I go with a 32 bit Debian chroot? Yes, Debian works fine. Follow the instructions in the Debian AMD64 HOWTO. I don't use 32 bit anything on AMD64. I can chroot to some more 64 bit installations. This is what I do: Either install debian from the Installer in a new partition or use debootstrap to build a debian in a new partition. Then mount the partitions as the HOWTO and then chroot to that partition. The big puzzle is getting the mounts setup and the bind mounts before trying to chroot. Or boot the new debian and chroot to ubuntu. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR ASUS A8V Deluxe ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256 Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2 Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid Kernel 2.6.11 XFree86 4.3.0.1 Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which version of AMD64 install?
I've looked through the mailing list and HOWTO, found some info re what the different versions of AMD64 do, but I'm still a little confused about which one (if any) is right for me. Right now your choices are mainly if you want sarge or sid. In case you want sarge, you have 2 more options: pure64, the one being maintained, or gcc3.4, at your own risk (so you will probably choose pure64). My needs are: Installing onto dual Opteron machine, used as server workstation Would like to run 64bit if possible. Will need to run IA32 chroot environment as well. Workstation usability more an issue than security. It seems to me that it doesn't matter which version: Sarge, SID, GCCxx I use. that's true, all of them fullfill your requests. I remember reading that the net install CD for sarge and SID are now the same thing? In the begining there was a port of the sarge netinst for sid-pure64, right now i don't know if there are 2 installers (one for sid and one for sarge). I reinstalled my sistem 2 weeks ago using DFS live-CD. I cdebootstrap all the packages from the network, so with DFS you can install all debian amd64 flavours with just one command (althoug this method it's not suitable for everybody as you will have to edit some configuration files from scratch, so it's better if you know a bit of how debian works first). What is the gcc version compared to the others? IE I know that gcc compiler 3.x and 4.0 are used, but that don't mean much to me. What gcc version does sarge SID use? sid-pure64 has gcc3.3 and 3.4 available, kernel-images are compiled with 3.4, but all other packages are compiled with gcc3.3 sid-gcc3.4 has packages compiled with either gcc3.4 or gcc4 Aritz Beraza [Rei] -- Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] ___ [ WWW ] http://evangelion.homelinux.net [jabber] rei[en]bulmalug.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another program for burning dvds
Alessandro writes: The output of dmesg with the dvd I burned in the drive is: attempt to access beyond end of device hda: rw=0, want=68, limit=4 isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=hda, iso_blknum=16, block=16 ++ I have seen this error before when the iso was bad after partial copying from a good iso. Use a mount -t iso9660 -o loop to see if the iso is the problem. I have used the dvd+rw-tools because dvdrecord is based on cdrecord. Use growisofs instead of mkisofs for DVDs. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR ASUS A8V Deluxe ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256 Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2 Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid Kernel 2.6.11 XFree86 4.3.0.1 Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - grub 0.95+cvs20040624
On (13/03/05 05:38), Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote:
Hi
I'm having some trouble with grub. Briefly, when I installed orginally,
I installed a 32 bit sarge system first and then the amd64 system, which
has been working fine. For the sake of clarity we'll call this
64bit install 'production' I decided to use the 32bit sarge space to do a
fresh amd64 system ('test') and I stupidly let the installer install grub.
Well
apart from having to mount and edit the 'production' fstab, I managed to
get back into my production system.
But I've tried both grub-install and the grub command line interface:
grub root (hd0,7)
grub setup (hd0)
setup (hd0)
Checking if /boot/grub/stage1 exists... yes
Checking if /boot/grub/stage2 exists... yes
Checking if /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 exists... yes
Running embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)... 16 sectors are embedded.
succeeded
Segmentation fault
When I try to boot, I get:
GRUB 1.5 (I think from memory)
and then nothing ;(
So it would appear that neither method is installing grub on the mbr
Unfortunately, I don't have a floppy on this machine and so I have to
repeat the 'test' install to get grub installed to the master boot
record. So the installer is successfully installing grub on the mbr.
I've tried this a number of times but not making headway but before
filing a bug report, I thought I'd check here first.
This is a known bug of grub, i had it 2 weeks ago. You won't be able
to install it by hand. I think it is a conflict with something in the
kernel as it only hapens with some versions of the kernel. For
example, with an old 2.6.6 grub works fine installing in the mbr,
but not for newer kernels like 2.6.8 or 2.6.10. You can download DFS
live-cd and try to install grub chrooting to you debian 64
installation. I thing DFS can boot with an amd64 ready 2.6.4 o 2.6.6
kernel.
Thanks Aritz
DSL got me a grub boot disk - thanks.
Strangely, amd64 ready 2.6.4 o 2.6.6 kernels booted fine but nothing
appeared when typing 'root' to login. Booting off the first 32 bit
kernel worked fine.
I haven't yet tried to chroot into my production system to fix grub -
another little project, once I get some more time ;)
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - grub 0.95+cvs20040624
On (13/03/05 06:38), Harald Dunkel wrote: Clive Menzies wrote: Hi But I've tried both grub-install and the grub command line interface: grub root (hd0,7) grub setup (hd0) setup (hd0) Checking if /boot/grub/stage1 exists... yes Checking if /boot/grub/stage2 exists... yes Checking if /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 exists... yes Running embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Segmentation fault Have you tried to boot using noexec=off on the kernel command line? Thanks but it's not even getting to the kernel options. The problem is that grub isn't being wrtitten to the Master Boot Record. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libc6 install problem
Hi Doing a fresh install on my Acer laptop,which is already running pure64 on other partition, I've running into a significant problem. After rebooting halfway through the install, aptitude started and went through the intital download of packages but seemed to barf on libc6. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-ds1-20-amd64.deb trying to overwrite /usr/lib64 I've tried 'aptitude install libc6' with the same result. I've already had to repeat the install once for this because aptitude removed locales (depends libc6) and I couldn't recover. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6 install problem
Clive writes: After rebooting halfway through the install, aptitude started and went through the intital download of packages but seemed to barf on libc6. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-ds1-20-amd64.deb trying to overwrite /usr/lib64 +++ What is the installer type and date used here? What is the sources.list used? This seems like an old problem that has already been fixed. Does the error say which is also in package base-files? I had to fix this on previous installs except not recently. 1. Check if there are links installed or make them by hand: /lib - /lib64 /usr/lib - /usr/lib64 2. Try to force install the libc6 overriding the problem. 3. Be sure the sarge installer uses debian-pure64 and the sid installer uses pure64 archives. 4. Mount the partition from a good install and update the files by hand. (this is a little more difficult) 5. Wait for somebody who knows the answer. Also, I think your MBR is corrupted with your lilo and grub. With DOS use fdisk /mbr if you can get at the disk. Then grub should install if that was the problem. There are ways to fix the mbr using various additional techniques I don't remember. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR ASUS A8V Deluxe ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256 Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2 Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid Kernel 2.6.11 XFree86 4.3.0.1 Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monitor Out of Range Error with xf86
Hello. I brought my AMD64 system home over spring break and I'm trying to configure it for another monitor. Whenever I try to configure with xf86config, and startx, it the monitor goes gray with wavey lines and says out of range. I looked up the properties on my gateway EV900 monitor and everything seems correct. I can't seem to figure out what the problem is. Everything works great with my other monitor. If anyone has any suggestions I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you! -Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qemu fo amd64
Hi All, I am looking for qemu package for pure64. Is there a repository which contains this package or somebody made it? You have bochs wich makes the same work. Aritz Beraza [Rei] -- Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] ___ [ WWW ] http://evangelion.homelinux.net [jabber] rei[en]bulmalug.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation fault - grub 0.95+cvs20040624
Clive Menzies wrote: On (13/03/05 06:38), Harald Dunkel wrote: Have you tried to boot using noexec=off on the kernel command line? Thanks but it's not even getting to the kernel options. The problem is that grub isn't being wrtitten to the Master Boot Record. I am talking about the system used to install grub on your MBR. noexec=off switches off the NX feature of your AMD64 CPU. AFAIK a fix is in grub's CVS. Good luck Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gcc-3.4: apt, autoconf and alsa are gone
Hi folks, Seems that a lot of packages starting with 'A' disappeared from the archive. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Monitor Out of Range Error with xf86
Hi Patrick. Post the output of: # cat /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 so we can see your config file. also post your video card model and information (just for fun just in case): :~$ lspci|grep VGA or just: :~$ lspci Also, meanwhile try using: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86This method is a little more up to date I believe. (as opposed to xf86config). unless you are using Xorg instead of xfree86, in which case I wouldn't know what to suggest. Chris W. On March 13, 2005 06:45 pm, Patrick Carlson wrote: Hello. I brought my AMD64 system home over spring break and I'm trying to configure it for another monitor. Whenever I try to configure with xf86config, and startx, it the monitor goes gray with wavey lines and says out of range. I looked up the properties on my gateway EV900 monitor and everything seems correct. I can't seem to figure out what the problem is. Everything works great with my other monitor. If anyone has any suggestions I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you! -Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
