Re: debian/watch: FTP with version encoded (only) in directory

2017-01-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:

> How can I get this right?

With just the ftp site alone it can't work (see below), luckily for
you there is a github page:

http://www.star.bristol.ac.uk/~mbt/stilts/#install
https://github.com/Starlink/starjava/releases

So this monstrosity should work:

version=3
options="uversionmangle=s/\-/./,downloadurlmangle=s{.*/stilts-([\d\.\-]+)\.zip}{ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v$1/stilts_src.zip};
\
https://github.com/Starlink/starjava/releases .*/archive/stilts-([\d\.\-]+).zip

It won't work with the ftp site because uscan doesn't let the version
number be in the directory name and the downloadurlmangle workaround
doesn't work with ftp. I think both of these are probably things that
uscan needs to support. There may be bugs for them, please check and
if not, file new ones.

uscan info: line:
ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v([\d\.\-]+)/stilts_src.zip
Use of uninitialized value $filepattern in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/bin/uscan line 2612,  line 3.
uscan warn: Filename pattern missing version delimiters () without
filenamemangle
  in watch, skipping:
  ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v([\d\.\-]+)/stilts_src.zip

uscan warn: downloadurlmangle option invalid for ftp sites,
  ignoring downloadurlmangle in watch:
  ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v([\d\.\-]+)

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



Bug#840750: RFS: picocoin/0.1-2.gbp43047g

2017-01-05 Thread David Steele

Expanding on the previous feedback (from a quick review):

You should clear all of the non-green issues on the [mentors page]. Note that 
debuild includes a lintian run.

changelog:
  - The NMU complaint is there because your names in control and changelog 
don't match.

control
  - You should also populate the Vcs fields in control. This references your 
Debian repository.

rules
  - There are many who would require you to clear out the comments in that file.

copyright
  - The ftp masters pay particularly close attention to the copyright file of 
packages in the NEW queue. Yours has an error in it (missing License line in 
the claim paragraph). It also is missing references to third party Copyright 
claims in the source tree, and to your files in the debian directory. Do a 
careful search of copyright claims, and make sure all are documented.
  - "The MIT License (MIT)" (exact text) is not on the 'official' list. See the 
[license list], referenced from the [copyright file spec]. The one you are 
looking for is probably 'Expat', though you should verify the text carefully.

[mentors page]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/picocoin
[license list]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
[copyright files spec]: 
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/


You can upload again to mentors when complete. Update the revision, and mark 
previous revisions as "UNRELEASED" (that may just be my personal preference).

-- 
"Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien" - Voltaire


signature.asc
Description: GooPG digital signature


Bug#849844: RFS: manpages-zh/1.6.0-1

2017-01-05 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo

Hello Boyuan,

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:54:15AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> 在 2017年1月2日星期一 SGT 下午12:23:49,Sean Whitton 写道:
> > debian/ is not part of the upstream code, so changes should be listed in
> > d/changelog.  Other Debian contributors should be able to quickly
> > determine which uploads changed which control files, by looking at
> > d/changelog.  So please be more verbose.
> 
> Thanks for your advice. Now I mention the modification of d/control and
> d/docs inside the changelog.

Unfortunately, the mention is still too brief.

The build-dep change is quite significant: perl -> python.  Imagine
someone is trying to debug this.  They read in your changelog "update
build dependencies" -- now they have to start pulling out
debdiff,debcheckout etc. to figure out what the change was.

It is much easier if you just provide details in your changelog.

(btw, it looks like you are responsible for most of the upstream release
-- great work.  This kind of work makes Debian more useful for people
around the world.  Thanks!)

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#850318: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/12.2-1)

2017-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:20:57 +0100
with message-id <11db3133-aaa5-ec8c-ddda-6bfb8...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#850318: RFS: pentobi/12.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #850318,
regarding RFS: pentobi/12.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
850318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests

Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi".

Package name: pentobi
Version : 12.2-1
Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger
URL : http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL-3.0+
Section : games

It builds those binary packages:

pentobi - clone of the strategy board game Blokus
pentobi-kde-thumbnailer - clone of the strategy board game Blokus - KDE 
thumbnailer


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


 https://mentors.debian.net/package/pentobi

Git repository can be viewed online at

 https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/pentobi.git

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pentobi/pentobi_12.2-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

pentobi (12.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.
  * d/control: Build-Dep kio-dev was renamed to libkf5kio-dev, but keep
the old name as an alternative (for Ubuntu).
  * d/copyright:
- Update copyright years.
- Use https in the copyright-format URL.

Regards,
 Juhani Numminen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 05.01.2017 21:57, Juhani Numminen wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> 
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi".

Hi Juhani,

I've uploaded your package. Thank you for your contribution!

P.S.: You can also ask on the debian-devel-games mailing list, if you
need a sponsor for packages maintained by this team.

Cheers,

Markus




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#849918: marked as done (RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1 [ITA])

2017-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:11:33 +0100
with message-id <1483657893.13501.1.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #849918,
regarding RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
849918: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849918
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux". I am the upstream
maintainer, and there is already an ITA from me against the package.

* Package name: tinymux
  Version : 2.10.1.13-1
  Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis 
* URL : http://www.tinymux.org/
* License : Artistic
  Section : games

It builds these binary packages:

  tinymux- text-based multi-user virtual world server

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/tinymux


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tinymux/tinymux_2.10.1.13-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release


Regards,
Stephen Dennis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2017, 05:14 -0700 schrieb Stephen Dennis:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Tobias Frost 
> wrote:
> 
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > 
> > BTW, you're using the tar.gz .. Can you use the tar.bz2 for the
> > packaging as it compresses better? This is also the one that is
> > picked
> > up by uscan... (Just use uscan --force-download to get a copy and
> > then
> > delete the other one)
> > 
> 
> Done.
> 
> 
> > - d/clean: You can use wildcards, eg. it is less fragile if your
> > clean
> > games/bin/* instead of the individual files.
> > 
> 
> Done.
> 
> 
> > - you do not need to d/clean condig.(log|status)
> > 
> 
> Done.
> 
> 
> > About the install:
> > - there are a few files with *.conf that are going to
> > /usr/share/...
> > Are they conf-files that should actually go to /etc/ as a kind of
> > system-wide configuration?
> > 
> 
> They would be game-specific -- the name of the game, ports used, The
> tinymux-install script doesn't support it directly, but someone could
> run
> that script multiple time, and rename the resulting tinymux directory
> to
> the um-teen different games they want to run. Each one would need to
> have
> it's own configuration.
> 
> 
> > 
> > >  - There's no obvious override for the duplicate changelog
> > > warning.
> > 
> > The problem is that dh_installchangelogs will pick it up, but
> > you've
> > got it also specified in d/docs.
> 
> 
> Just removed CHANGES from d/docs.
> 
> > 
> > 
> 
> You shouldn't install the doc INSTALL, as this is not relevant for
> > Debian binary packages -- it talks mostly about how to compile etc.
> > (README.Debian takes it job appearantly already)
> > 
> 
> Did not see that one in the d/docs file. There are references to it
> in
> other readme files, but that file itself is not being installed.
> 
> > 
> > While this explains the why very well (and is too extensive on the
> > what
> > (this is will be in the diff) Convention is just to write:
> >    * New maintainer. (Closes: #YourITABugNumber)
> > 
> 
> Let's be fashionable. Changed to reference the bug.
> 
> 
> > One thing I noted: NOTES mentions there is a default password. (I
> > guess
> > it it a kind of admin password) This is a bad idea, securitywise
> > and
> > should be changed.
> 
> 
> It is a kind of admin password, the password to the ''god' account
> within
> the game. A bit of tradition buried there (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie). These mud games were once
> hosted
> in hidden fashion on University boxes, hidden in plain sight. You had
> to be
> smart enough to find the party or deserve an invitation. It's not
> like that
> now.
> 
> OK, back to business. I agree that it is a bad idea. A fix would
> require
> that the following lines in netmux.db be changed at install time:
> 
> > 5
> 
> "$SHA1$X0PG0reTn66s$FxO7KKs/CJ+an2rDWgGO4zpo1co="
> 
> Or, a command-line option to netmux added that went through the steps
> of
> loading the game's database but immediately changing the password to
> something else before accepting connections. Both options would need
> upstream work. I prefer the second option, but any option would
> require
> upstream work.
> 
> None of the game accounts are given 

Bug#850318: RFS: pentobi/12.2-1

2017-01-05 Thread Juhani Numminen

Package: sponsorship-requests

Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi".

Package name: pentobi
Version : 12.2-1
Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger
URL : http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL-3.0+
Section : games

It builds those binary packages:

pentobi - clone of the strategy board game Blokus
pentobi-kde-thumbnailer - clone of the strategy board game Blokus - KDE 
thumbnailer


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


 https://mentors.debian.net/package/pentobi

Git repository can be viewed online at

 https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/pentobi.git

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pentobi/pentobi_12.2-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

pentobi (12.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.
  * d/control: Build-Dep kio-dev was renamed to libkf5kio-dev, but keep
the old name as an alternative (for Ubuntu).
  * d/copyright:
- Update copyright years.
- Use https in the copyright-format URL.

Regards,
 Juhani Numminen



Bug#847101: kimchi source updated

2017-01-05 Thread Lucio Correia

I've uploaded new packaging to fix some warnings:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kimchi/kimchi_2.3.1-1.dsc


Regards,
--
Lucio Correia



Bug#836382: marked as done (RFS: paflib/0.3.0-1)

2017-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:31:17 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: paflib/0.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #836382,
regarding RFS: paflib/0.3.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
836382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836382
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors, Gianfranco,

 I am looking for a sponsor for the package "paflib".
 This is a packaging update :

 paflib (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

   * New upstream release

  -- Thierry Fauck  Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:23:02 +0200


  Package name: paflib
  Version : 0.3.0-1
  Upstream Author : Carlos Eduardo Seo 
  URL : http://github.com/paflib/paflib/
  License : GPL-2+, mit
  Section : libs

 To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


https://mentors.debian.net/package/paflib


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/paflib/paflib_0.3.0-1.dsc


 More information about paflib can be obtained from 
http://github.com/paflib/paflib/



 Regards,
  Thierry Fauck


--

__
thf - Thierry Fauck - tfa...@free.fr>
/pubkey: 4096R/FCC181CE/
/fingerprint: 5CCF 6B82 DE4E E72A A40B B63E A153 BF4F FCC1 81CE/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package paflib version 0.3.0-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/paflib--- End Message ---


Bug#848384: marked as done (RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-20000911-7 [RC] [ITA])

2017-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:31:16 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-2911-7 [RC] [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #848384,
regarding RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-2911-7 [RC] [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
848384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: serious

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmacro"

* Package name: xmacro
   Version : 0.3pre-2911-7
   Upstream Author : Gabor Keresztfalvi 
 * URL :  https://sourceforge.net/projects/xmacro/
 * License : GPLv2
   Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

xmacro - Record / Play keystrokes and mouse movements in X displays

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/xmacro


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmacro/xmacro_0.3pre-2911-7.dsc

Changes since the last upload:
  * Fixing build failure with GCC-6 via rearanging the header order
patch by Eduard Bloch
(closes: #831195)
  * Change compat and control to debhelper 9, Standards-Version to 3.9.8
  * Change dh_clean -k to dh-prep
  * Move patch format to full 3.0 (quilt) without global .diff.gz
  * New maintainer for package: Vincent Carluer (closes: #832150)


This is my first packaging :D

Regards,

Vincent Carluer
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package xmacro version 0.3pre-2911-7 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/xmacro--- End Message ---


debian/watch: FTP with version encoded (only) in directory

2017-01-05 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi,

I have the following sample download URL

ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v3.0-9/stilts_src.zip

Corresponding Debian version number should be 3.0.9.

I tried

version=3
options="uversionmangle=s/\-/./,filenamemangle=s/\/$/.zip/" \
ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v([\d\.\-]+)/ stilts_src.zip

but it doesn't work; basically it adjusts upstream version to be 1:

uscan info: Newest upstream tarball version selected for download 
(uversionmangled): 1

How can I get this right?

Cheers

Ole




Bug#847102: ginger source updated

2017-01-05 Thread Lucio Correia

I've uploaded a new source package fixing warnings:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ginger/ginger_2.3.1-1.dsc


Regards,
--
Lucio Correia



Bug#847108: ginger-base source updated

2017-01-05 Thread Lucio Correia

I've uploaded a new package fixing DTD warning.

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ginger-base/ginger-base_2.2.2-1.dsc


Regards,
--
Lucio Correia



Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-05 Thread Stephen Dennis
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Tobias Frost  wrote:

> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> BTW, you're using the tar.gz .. Can you use the tar.bz2 for the
> packaging as it compresses better? This is also the one that is picked
> up by uscan... (Just use uscan --force-download to get a copy and then
> delete the other one)
>

Done.


> - d/clean: You can use wildcards, eg. it is less fragile if your clean
> games/bin/* instead of the individual files.
>

Done.


> - you do not need to d/clean condig.(log|status)
>

Done.


> About the install:
> - there are a few files with *.conf that are going to /usr/share/...
> Are they conf-files that should actually go to /etc/ as a kind of
> system-wide configuration?
>

They would be game-specific -- the name of the game, ports used, The
tinymux-install script doesn't support it directly, but someone could run
that script multiple time, and rename the resulting tinymux directory to
the um-teen different games they want to run. Each one would need to have
it's own configuration.


>
> >  - There's no obvious override for the duplicate changelog warning.
>
> The problem is that dh_installchangelogs will pick it up, but you've
> got it also specified in d/docs.


Just removed CHANGES from d/docs.

>
>
You shouldn't install the doc INSTALL, as this is not relevant for
> Debian binary packages -- it talks mostly about how to compile etc.
> (README.Debian takes it job appearantly already)
>

Did not see that one in the d/docs file. There are references to it in
other readme files, but that file itself is not being installed.

>
> While this explains the why very well (and is too extensive on the what
> (this is will be in the diff) Convention is just to write:
>* New maintainer. (Closes: #YourITABugNumber)
>

Let's be fashionable. Changed to reference the bug.


> One thing I noted: NOTES mentions there is a default password. (I guess
> it it a kind of admin password) This is a bad idea, securitywise and
> should be changed.


It is a kind of admin password, the password to the ''god' account within
the game. A bit of tradition buried there (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie). These mud games were once hosted
in hidden fashion on University boxes, hidden in plain sight. You had to be
smart enough to find the party or deserve an invitation. It's not like that
now.

OK, back to business. I agree that it is a bad idea. A fix would require
that the following lines in netmux.db be changed at install time:

>5
"$SHA1$X0PG0reTn66s$FxO7KKs/CJ+an2rDWgGO4zpo1co="

Or, a command-line option to netmux added that went through the steps of
loading the game's database but immediately changing the password to
something else before accepting connections. Both options would need
upstream work. I prefer the second option, but any option would require
upstream work.

None of the game accounts are given any control over the shell account. The
worst #1 should be able to do is delete the database from the inside or
change a configuration option which takes the game down by causing a
divide-by-zero. What worries me more than the initial, default #1 password.
is the UTF-8 state machine that parses input for all users and the fact all
users have access to PCRE globs. I still remember the old telnet bugs, and
PCRE globs are mini-programs, and it isn't hard to tie the game up for an
hour with a carefully chosen ones. We've added CPU limits within the inner
loops in the PCRE code to forestall this, and that's the only reasons why I
use the PCRE statically instead of using it as a library.


Bug#842041: RFS: highlighterpdf/0.7-1 [ ITP]

2017-01-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

The source tarball contains just .jar. It needs to contain the sources and
tools to build those sources into the .jar.

Packaging problems:
You shouldn't put random numbers into Closes: in the changelog entry, you
need to open the ITP bug and use its number there.
The current recommended debhelper compat level is 10.
The Homepage field should point to the project page where the project
source can be obtained.
The manpage section 6 is for games.
.desktop should't have extra blank lines. And why StartupNotify=false?
The icon should be installed in the standard icon path.
You can't install a .jar into /usr/bin, that won't work.


-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#840750: RFS: picocoin/0.1-2.gbp43047g

2017-01-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

The package has lots of lintian warnings, please fix them first.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#842166: marked as done (RFS: findent-2.7.3-1 [ITP] -- indent / convert Fortran source)

2017-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:56:55 +0500
with message-id <20170105105655.xpdzv6k2vibvh...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request
has caused the Debian Bug report #842166,
regarding RFS: findent-2.7.3-1 [ITP] -- indent / convert Fortran source
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
842166: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842166
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "findent":
 
   * Package name: findent
 Version : 6.2.0
 Upstream Author : Willem Vermin wver...@gmail.com
   * URL :
   * https://sourceforge.net/projects/findent/files/
   * License : fair
   * Section : development
 
It builds this binary package:
  
findent - indent / convert Fortran source

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers xenial-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'xenial-updates'), (500, 'xenial-security'), (500, 
'xenial'), (100, 'xenial-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-45-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded, thanks.
Please note that the current debhelper compat level is 10.
Also, your source tarball shups the prebuilt binary. As you are the
upstream you should fix that in the next release.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#850193: marked as done (RFS: forge/0.9.2-2)

2017-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:56:20 + (UTC)
with message-id <159502895.187713.1483610180...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#850193: RFS: forge/0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #850193,
regarding RFS: forge/0.9.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
850193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge"

* Package name: forge
  Version : 0.9.2-2
  Upstream Author : ArrayFire
* URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/forge
* License : BSD
  Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  forge-doc  - documentation for forge
  libforge-dev - development files for forge
  libforge0  - high-performance OpenGL visualization

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/forge

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/forge/forge_0.9.2-2.dsc

Successful build on debomatic:

  http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/forge/0.9.2-2/buildlog

Changes since the last upload:

  * Cherry-pick upstream patch facilitating builds with system
libraries.
New patch 0003-Consistent-definition-of-USE_SYSTEM-flags-
for-glbind.patch
  * Force use of system dependencies via the USE_SYSTEM
flags.
Reason: fixes FTBFS during reproducible builds
  * Add missing
build dependency on OpenGL.
Reason: fixes FTBFS on sparc64
  * Add
support for the nodoc build profile.
  * Add patch fixing spelling
errors reported by Lintian.
New patch 0004-Fix-spelling-errors.patch

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge"

sponsored by 

G.--- End Message ---