Bug#690471: marked as done (unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:00:21 +0200
with message-id <20121015060021.gm17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690471: unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690471,
regarding unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package tgmochikit.  This version clarifies the
licence status of some files.

diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+tgmochikit (1.4.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Remove the text 'See scriptaculous.js for full license' from
+Sortable.js.  This file (and DragAndDrop.js) is derived from
+scriptaculous-js  which is MIT-licenced
+and compatible with the MIT/AFL dual-licence applied to all the
+Javascript code. (Closes: #689285)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:46:29 +0100
+
 tgmochikit (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Jakub Wilk ]
diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 MIT for the Python part
 MIT/AFL for the JavaScript part
 
-All Mochikit JavaScript files report "All Rights Reserved". This is, from the
+Most Mochikit JavaScript files report "All Rights Reserved". This is, from the
 point of view of MochiKit upstream, a way to redirect the licensing to the
 LICENSE.txt files that can be found in the distribution root (which dual
 licenses it MIT and AFL). See: http://markmail.org/message/doxccpq5mefweeay
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/trunk/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/trunk/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._module('Sortable', '1.5', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.1/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.1/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.2/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.2/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
--- END ---

unblock tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-

Bug#690501: marked as done (unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:56:00 +0200
with message-id <20121015055600.gl17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690501: unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690501,
regarding unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello,

Please unblock package loadlin

unblock loadlin/1.6f-1

See the attached debdiff. This is a new "upstream" release (I am
upstream), but it only includes two things:

- the cppcheck patch we had in Debian is now integrated as such
upstream, so this change is a no-op for us.
- the actually interesting thing is the change in loadlin.asm, which is
needed to be able to boot wheezy kernels. The change reduces the buffer
size for the command line (down to 864 characters, still plenty) in
order to release 4KiB room for the setup heap, needed by newer kernels.

I preferred to upload the new upstream 1.6f release itself rather than
adding a patch to avoid confusion for users: since the upstream release
mainly contain the second change, using version name 1.6e in Debian
would let users think that change is not there. Or conversely, people
using 1.6e from Debian would believe that the upstream 1.6e already had
the change.

Thanks,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
Samuel
> Allez, soyez sympa ... traduisez-lui "linux"
Linux, c'est comme le miel : c'est vachement bon mais ça attire les
mouches. En plus, ça colle aux doigts et on a du mal à s'en défaire.
-+- TP in: Guide du linuxien pervers - "Barrez vous les mouches !"
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog   2012-04-01 21:32:40.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog   2012-10-05 02:51:20.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+loadlin (1.6f-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release. Fixes booting the Wheezy kernels.
+  * debian/rules:
+- Set BYHAND to yes, as we need a new loadlin.exe uploaded to mirrors to
+be able to boot the Wheezy kernels.
+  * debian/patches/cppcheck: Drop, merged upstream.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault   Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:42:31 +0200
+
 loadlin (1.6e-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules:
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch 
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch   2011-02-21 23:14:56.0 
+0100
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch   2012-10-05 02:49:13.0 
+0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 diff -r 56b6cf82d167 -r c8190a00fb15 src/loadlin.asm
 --- a/src/loadlin.asm  Tue Feb 09 03:29:55 2010 +0100
 +++ b/src/loadlin.asm  Wed Apr 28 20:13:19 2010 +0200
-@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6e'
+@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6f'
locals
jumps
  
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck 
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck2012-04-01 21:28:36.0 
+0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# HG changeset patch
-# User Samuel Thibault 
-# Date 1293314723 -3600
-# Branch debian
-# Node ID cc08aceb936fadb70ad6feaccb8bc97ba1c1ad6c
-# Parent  70d9a1ffd330c9b79454b5f4496cddfd8474b8f9
-cppcheck fixes
-
-diff -r 70d9a1ffd330 -r cc08aceb936f src/srclinux/pgadjust.c
 a/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c  Sun Sep 12 00:29:00 2010 +0200
-+++ b/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c  Sat Dec 25 23:05:23 2010 +0100
-@@ -363,13 +363,16 @@
-   PAGELIST->count=i;
-   PAGELIST->blocks[bi-1].tcount=i-PAGELIST->blocks[bi-1].start;
-   PAGELIST->auxbuf=(void *)0x1000;
-+  fclose(f);
- }
- 
- int main(int argc, char** argv)
- {
-   read_pagelist(argv[1]);
--  printf("count %d nblocks %d\n", PAGELIST->count, 
PAGELIST->number_of_blocks);
--  if (PAGELIST) adjust();
-+  if (PAGELIST) {
-+printf("count %d nblocks %d\n", PAGELIST->count, 
PAGELIST->number_of_blocks);
-+adjust();
-+  }
-   return 0;
- }
- 
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/series loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/seri

Bug#690502: marked as done (unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 05:54:12 +0100
with message-id <1350276852.4156.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690502: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690502,
regarding unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ruby1.8

Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for
CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945).

Attached you will find a debdiff between the version in wheezy and this
one.

unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Antonio Terceiro 
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog	2012-06-02 07:34:01.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog	2012-10-14 19:46:41.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * added debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch to fix CVE-2012-4481
+(Closes: #689945)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:45:52 -0300
+
 ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules: avoid running DRB tests, since they crash and leave runaway
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch	1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch	2012-10-14 19:45:15.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: avoid breaking safefity in strings passed to Exception#to_s
+ Fixes CVE-2012-4481
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/689945
+Origin: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/22
+Reviewed-By: Antonio Terceiro 
+
+--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358.orig/error.c
 ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/error.c
+@@ -665,9 +665,6 @@ name_err_to_s(exc)
+ 
+ if (NIL_P(mesg)) return rb_class_name(CLASS_OF(exc));
+ StringValue(str);
+-if (str != mesg) {
+-	OBJ_INFECT(str, mesg);
+-}
+ return str;
+ }
+ 
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series	2012-05-27 10:59:27.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series	2012-10-14 19:43:03.0 -0300
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
 110703_CVE-2011-0188.patch
 tcltk-no-rpath.patch
 use-ldflags.patch
+CVE-2012-4481.patch


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 20:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Please unblock package ruby1.8
> 
> Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for
> CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945).

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5

2012-10-14 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
Hi Adam,

On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:26:30 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:

> Looking through the diff, there's an undocumented bump of the
> debhelper compat level from 4 to 6. What's the rationale for that?

Hmm, this package is very simple and so I seldom update 
the package.  So I'm afraid the package becomes rather an old
style package as time passes.  So when I've got a chance 
to update package I've tried to update anything as possible 
as I can.

I don't remeber precisely, but I guess I bump the debhelper
compat level along the following modification.

  * To erase lintian warnings, we refine debian/rules a bit.

This might be not an appropriate modification at a freeze period
but I think this is not a practical problem.

If I should change packaging or changelog or anything, please
let me know.

Best regards,   2012-10-15(Mon)

-- 
 Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda 
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121015.102113.92653586279398529.atsuhito@at-vaio



Bug#690502: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5

2012-10-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ruby1.8

Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for
CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945).

Attached you will find a debdiff between the version in wheezy and this
one.

unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Antonio Terceiro 
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog	2012-06-02 07:34:01.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog	2012-10-14 19:46:41.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * added debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch to fix CVE-2012-4481
+(Closes: #689945)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:45:52 -0300
+
 ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules: avoid running DRB tests, since they crash and leave runaway
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch	1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch	2012-10-14 19:45:15.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: avoid breaking safefity in strings passed to Exception#to_s
+ Fixes CVE-2012-4481
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/689945
+Origin: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/22
+Reviewed-By: Antonio Terceiro 
+
+--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358.orig/error.c
 ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/error.c
+@@ -665,9 +665,6 @@ name_err_to_s(exc)
+ 
+ if (NIL_P(mesg)) return rb_class_name(CLASS_OF(exc));
+ StringValue(str);
+-if (str != mesg) {
+-	OBJ_INFECT(str, mesg);
+-}
+ return str;
+ }
+ 
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series	2012-05-27 10:59:27.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series	2012-10-14 19:43:03.0 -0300
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
 110703_CVE-2011-0188.patch
 tcltk-no-rpath.patch
 use-ldflags.patch
+CVE-2012-4481.patch


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690501: unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1

2012-10-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello,

Please unblock package loadlin

unblock loadlin/1.6f-1

See the attached debdiff. This is a new "upstream" release (I am
upstream), but it only includes two things:

- the cppcheck patch we had in Debian is now integrated as such
upstream, so this change is a no-op for us.
- the actually interesting thing is the change in loadlin.asm, which is
needed to be able to boot wheezy kernels. The change reduces the buffer
size for the command line (down to 864 characters, still plenty) in
order to release 4KiB room for the setup heap, needed by newer kernels.

I preferred to upload the new upstream 1.6f release itself rather than
adding a patch to avoid confusion for users: since the upstream release
mainly contain the second change, using version name 1.6e in Debian
would let users think that change is not there. Or conversely, people
using 1.6e from Debian would believe that the upstream 1.6e already had
the change.

Thanks,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
Samuel
> Allez, soyez sympa ... traduisez-lui "linux"
Linux, c'est comme le miel : c'est vachement bon mais ça attire les
mouches. En plus, ça colle aux doigts et on a du mal à s'en défaire.
-+- TP in: Guide du linuxien pervers - "Barrez vous les mouches !"
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog   2012-04-01 21:32:40.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog   2012-10-05 02:51:20.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+loadlin (1.6f-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release. Fixes booting the Wheezy kernels.
+  * debian/rules:
+- Set BYHAND to yes, as we need a new loadlin.exe uploaded to mirrors to
+be able to boot the Wheezy kernels.
+  * debian/patches/cppcheck: Drop, merged upstream.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault   Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:42:31 +0200
+
 loadlin (1.6e-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules:
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch 
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch   2011-02-21 23:14:56.0 
+0100
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch   2012-10-05 02:49:13.0 
+0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 diff -r 56b6cf82d167 -r c8190a00fb15 src/loadlin.asm
 --- a/src/loadlin.asm  Tue Feb 09 03:29:55 2010 +0100
 +++ b/src/loadlin.asm  Wed Apr 28 20:13:19 2010 +0200
-@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6e'
+@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6f'
locals
jumps
  
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck 
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck2012-04-01 21:28:36.0 
+0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# HG changeset patch
-# User Samuel Thibault 
-# Date 1293314723 -3600
-# Branch debian
-# Node ID cc08aceb936fadb70ad6feaccb8bc97ba1c1ad6c
-# Parent  70d9a1ffd330c9b79454b5f4496cddfd8474b8f9
-cppcheck fixes
-
-diff -r 70d9a1ffd330 -r cc08aceb936f src/srclinux/pgadjust.c
 a/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c  Sun Sep 12 00:29:00 2010 +0200
-+++ b/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c  Sat Dec 25 23:05:23 2010 +0100
-@@ -363,13 +363,16 @@
-   PAGELIST->count=i;
-   PAGELIST->blocks[bi-1].tcount=i-PAGELIST->blocks[bi-1].start;
-   PAGELIST->auxbuf=(void *)0x1000;
-+  fclose(f);
- }
- 
- int main(int argc, char** argv)
- {
-   read_pagelist(argv[1]);
--  printf("count %d nblocks %d\n", PAGELIST->count, 
PAGELIST->number_of_blocks);
--  if (PAGELIST) adjust();
-+  if (PAGELIST) {
-+printf("count %d nblocks %d\n", PAGELIST->count, 
PAGELIST->number_of_blocks);
-+adjust();
-+  }
-   return 0;
- }
- 
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/series loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/series
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/series  2012-04-01 21:28:42.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/series  2012-09-17 01:59:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-cppcheck
 99-yasm.patch
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/rules loadlin-1.6f/debian/rules
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/rules   2012-04-01 21:22:46.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/rules   2012-09-17 01:58:57.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 DEB_TARBALL=
 DEB_INSTALL_CHANGELOGS_loadlin=doc/changes
 
-BYHAND ?= no
+BYHAND ?= yes
 
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
 
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/doc/changes loadlin-1.6f/doc/changes
--- loadlin-1.6e/doc/changes2010-08-25 02:48:28.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/doc/changes2012-09-17 01:37:40.982396102 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,16 @@
===
 
 
+LOADLIN-16f
+===
+Recent Li

Bug#690466: marked as done (unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:27:42 +0100
with message-id <1350250062.4156.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690466,
regarding unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5.

This adds Conflicts: doc-base (<< 0.10.3) and closes #652638.

Complete debdiff:

#v+
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog  2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog  2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libuuid-perl (0.02-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/control: conflict on doc-base << 0.10.3 to avoid package
+installation failure due to symbol lookup errors when perl 5.14 and
+libuuid-perl get unpacked and trigger the old doc-base.
+Thanks to Martin Pitt for testing this in Ubuntu, Niko Tyni for the
+initial analysis, and Stuart Prescott for further triaging.
+(Closes: #652638) (LP: #902553)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:09:59 +0200
+
 libuuid-perl (0.02-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ gregor herrmann ]
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 Package: libuuid-perl
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Conflicts: doc-base (<< 0.10.3)
 Description: Perl extension for using UUID interfaces as defined in e2fsprogs
  This is a Perl interface to libuuid from e2fsprogs.  It allows generation,
  parsing, and unparsing of UUIDs.
#v-

unblock libuuid-perl/0.02-5


Thanks in advance,
gregor


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=S4Gt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:19 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5.
> 
> This adds Conflicts: doc-base (<< 0.10.3) and closes #652638.

Unblocked; thanks.

Also closing #673913, which is a symptom of the issue fixed by this
change.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap

2012-10-14 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On söndagen den 14 oktober 2012, you stated the following:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke
> > all packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra,
> > internal (and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that
> > fails.
> > 
> > The SONAME *shouldn't* have had to be changed as 2007f is merely a bugfix
> > release, except for an attempt to also support AIX 5.2, but that's
> > nothing that affects us. There are no ABI or API changes. See attached
> > diff.
> 
> How about the patch below?

It might certainly be a good idea too disable that check permanently; it is 
rather redundant after all.

> diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog
> uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog ---
> uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog   2012-06-29 13:32:24.0 +0200
> +++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog   2012-10-14 20:02:14.0
> +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * Disable broken version check (closes: #682256)
> +
> + -- Julien Cristau   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:02:13 +0200
> +

-- 
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, David Prévot wrote:

> [ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue
> than -release ]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> 
> > When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically
> > get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first
> > time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of
> > iceweasel, version bumps also require new packages for xulrunner and
> > libmozjs, and that prevents automatic upgrades: iceweasel's is kept
> > back by apt. Default apt preferences for the iceweasel packages would
> > ensure stable users that use backports sources will always get the
> > latest.
> 
> You may wish to include an /etc/apt/preferences.d/iceweasel [1] file in
> your backported software, but I wonder if that would be a really good
> idea, if that would be enough to achieve your purpose, and if that would
> be safe of unwanted side effects.
Wrong, not in the backported one. In the stable one. If a package is
installed from bpo the file isn't needed.

Alex


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014195602.ga5...@snow-crash.org



Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread David Prévot
[ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue
than -release ]

Hi,

Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit :

> When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically
> get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first
> time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of
> iceweasel, version bumps also require new packages for xulrunner and
> libmozjs, and that prevents automatic upgrades: iceweasel's is kept
> back by apt. Default apt preferences for the iceweasel packages would
> ensure stable users that use backports sources will always get the
> latest.

You may wish to include an /etc/apt/preferences.d/iceweasel [1] file in
your backported software, but I wonder if that would be a really good
idea, if that would be enough to achieve your purpose, and if that would
be safe of unwanted side effects.

1: $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/iceweasel
Package: iceweasel
Pin: release a=squeeze-backports
Pin-Priority: 500

Regards

David




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#687779: marked as done (unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:32:52 +0200
with message-id <20121014183252.gj17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687779: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687779,
regarding unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hi,

Please unblock package ksh/93u+20120628-1 which fixes #679966 (severity
grave).

Frankly it would be better to exclude ksh from the next Debian release
than include it with this bug because it breaks very basic functionality
in the shell. The fix was done upstream so I don't really know the
details.

Thanks

Oliver
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 23:40:45 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

> tags 679966 + patch
> tags 679966 + pending
> thanks
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
> 
> RMs: please clear for an upload to t-p-u, thanks.
> 
Uploaded and approved.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:

> Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke all 
> packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, internal 
> (and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that fails.
> 
> The SONAME *shouldn't* have had to be changed as 2007f is merely a bugfix 
> release, except for an attempt to also support AIX 5.2, but that's nothing 
> that affects us. There are no ABI or API changes. See attached diff. 
> 
How about the patch below?

Cheers,
Julien

diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-29 13:32:24.0 +0200
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 20:02:14.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Disable broken version check (closes: #682256)
+
+ -- Julien Cristau   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:02:13 +0200
+
 uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch 
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch  
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch  
2012-10-14 19:59:55.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Index: uw-imap/src/c-client/mail.c
+===
+--- uw-imap.orig/src/c-client/mail.c
 uw-imap/src/c-client/mail.c
+@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static void mail_string_setpos (STRING *
+ 
+ void mail_versioncheck (char *version)
+ {
++#if 0
+   /* attempt to protect again wrong .h */
+   if (strcmp (version,mailcclientversion)) {
+ char tmp[MAILTMPLEN];
+@@ -300,6 +301,7 @@ void mail_versioncheck (char *version)
+version,mailcclientversion);
+ fatal (tmp);
+   }
++#endif
+ }
+ 
+ 
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series 
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series2012-06-29 13:05:33.0 
+0200
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series2012-10-14 19:58:25.0 
+0200
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 2002_mailspool.patch
 2004_no_binaries_below_etc.patch
 2010_disallow_escaping_home.patch
+2011_disable_version_check.patch


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690464: pre-approval: dput nmu

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:14:08 +0100, Alberto Á. Fuentes wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Dear release team,
> 
> There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release
> teams and the maintainer has not been very responsive lately.
> 
> I was wondering uploading a nmu with the diff attached would be considered
> for unblocking and could make it to the wheezy release.
> 
Looks ok to me.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690475: release.debian.org: unblock: pear-horde-channel/4

2012-10-14 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello release team,

Mathieu Parent uploaded a pear-horde-channel source package to unstable.
This builds the pear-horde-channel binary package, which basically consists
of just the file /usr/share/php/.channels/pear.horde.org.reg.  This file
is needed for building

 php-horde-activesync
 php-horde-alarm
 php-horde-argv
 php-horde-auth
 php-horde-autoloader
 php-horde-browser
 php-horde-cache
 [...]
 php-horde-vfs
 php-horde-view
 php-horde-xml-element
 php-horde-xml-wbxml

(see (Bug #683554 RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies) for the complete list).

In current testing, the pear-horde-channel binary package is created from the
horde3 source package, which is scheduled for removal from Debian (Bug#683554:
RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies).

The debdiff of the old and new binary package is available from
http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/pear-horde-channel_3.3.12%2bdebian0-2.2_vs_4.debdiff
 .
The files debian/copyright as well as a full diff are available from
http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/ .

Unfortunately, the new pear-horde-channel Debian source package lacks
instructions on how to recreate the generated file pear.horde.org.reg.  I've
just filed Bug #690463 reporting this issue.

In the mean time, please allow pear-horde-channel/4 to enter Debian testing.

Thank you for considering.

Joost

unblock: pear-horde-channel/4


PS: See Bug#683628 "release-notes: Re: Horde and Kolab removed" for even
more background information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014172017.ge...@beskar.mdcc.cx



Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

2012-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 17:56 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
[...]
> The library behaves sanely without the kernel module and dropping just
> the -dkms package would be my preferred solution. Most binaries that
> use BLCR are built to run in environments where the presence of the
> kernel part isn't a given. Upstream doesn't have funding at the moment
> to add support for newer kernels (they sound like it's something they
> hope to return to though) and my attempts at developing a patch were
> largely unsuccessful, i.e. worse than no patch at all.

Unfortunately checkpoint/restore is not something that can be
implemented properly without explicit support in the kernel, i.e. it's
not suitable for an out-of-tree module.  This has gradually being added
and I think it is mostly done upstream, but much of that is post-3.2.
Hopefully libcr will be updated in future to make use of the new kernel
mechanisms rather than its own module.

> I anticipate that the library itself ought to be useable when such a
> patch arrives.
> 
> There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
> the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package
> should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the
> future in my view.

Yes, that sounds like a reasonable thing to do for now.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#690472: marked as done (unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:08:30 +0100
with message-id <36ec702d81b0e3355c8ad69d0ef47...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690472: unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690472,
regarding unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package wzdftpd

This fixes bug #689906 which made the daemon fail to start after
reboot if /run is a tmpfs.

diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Create /var/run/wzdftpd from init script (Closes: #689906)
+(based on patch by Thomas Goirand)
+  * Fix spelling of 'bandwidth' in description
+  * Remove duplicate upstream changelog
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:46:01 +0100
+
 wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  It includes several authentication backends, is easily scriptable and provides
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the MySQL backend for wzdftpd.
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the PostgreSQL backend for wzdftpd.
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the necessary files to enable zeroconf support in
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the necessary files to run Tcl plugins in wzdftpd,
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the necessary files to run Perl plugins in wzdftpd,
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides all needed files to develop extensions for wzdftpd.
diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 DAEMON=/usr/sbin/wzdftpd
 NAME=wzdftpd
 D

Bug#690472: unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2

2012-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package wzdftpd

This fixes bug #689906 which made the daemon fail to start after
reboot if /run is a tmpfs.

diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Create /var/run/wzdftpd from init script (Closes: #689906)
+(based on patch by Thomas Goirand)
+  * Fix spelling of 'bandwidth' in description
+  * Remove duplicate upstream changelog
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:46:01 +0100
+
 wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  It includes several authentication backends, is easily scriptable and provides
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the MySQL backend for wzdftpd.
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the PostgreSQL backend for wzdftpd.
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the necessary files to enable zeroconf support in
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the necessary files to run Tcl plugins in wzdftpd,
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides the necessary files to run Perl plugins in wzdftpd,
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
  implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol.
  .
  Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security,
- speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
+ speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories,
  dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc.
  .
  This package provides all needed files to develop extensions for wzdftpd.
diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 DAEMON=/usr/sbin/wzdftpd
 NAME=wzdftpd
 DESC=wzdftpd
+PID_DIR=/var/run/$NAME
 
 test -x $DAEMON || exit 0
 
@@ -34,6 +35,11 @@
 case "$1" in
   start)
echo -n "Starting $DESC: "
+   mkdir -p $PID_DIR
+   # the following will be used to run the server as a non-privileged user
+   if id ftp >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
+ chown ftp $PID_DIR
+   fi
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet \
--pidfile /var/run/$NAME/$NAME.pid --exec $DAEMON -- 
$DAEMON_OPTS
echo "$NAME."
diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm
--- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm
+++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
rm -f /etc/wzdftpd/users /etc/wzdftpd/users.OLD
rm -f /etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg
rm -f /etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg.wzdftpd-old /etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg.wzdftpd-new 
/etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg

Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1

2012-10-14 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 14/10/12 18:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Already done earlier today; see #690440.

Ha! Someone could have CC'd me on that! ;)
Thanks anyway and sorry for the noise!

Cheers

-- 
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

2012-10-14 Thread Alan Woodland
On 14 October 2012 17:07, Ben Hutchings  wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>
>> On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
>> > #638339).  It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but
>> > it cannot now be released in wheezy.  Therefore please remove
>> > from testing only.
>>
>> As mentioned at the BSP, the library has several reverse dependencies.
>> Do we know whether dropping the kernel module and keeping the libraries
>> would work? (CCing the maintainer).
>
> I'm not familiar with the package but from the description it appears
> that the library is only an interface to the kernel module, thus it
> won't be usable with current kernel packages.
>
> The changelog states that:
>
>   * blcr-dkms still lacks support for 2.6.39/3.x kernels, but is useful to:
> - Users running newer kernels with stable
> - Users running older kernels with testing/unstable
> - Developers working on support for newer kernels
>
> However I don't think that any longterm kernel series older than 2.6.39
> will be supported for the lifetime of wheezy.  Further, userland
> packages in jessie will be allowed to assume a kernel version of 3.2 or
> later, so the next upgrade may fail badly.
>
> If the interface between the library and kernel module is stable (though
> I suspect not...) then the library might be usable with an updated
> module when that arrives.  Then it would seem reasonable to include the
> library only in wheezy.  But if not then I don't think either belongs in
> the release.
>
> [...]
>> # Broken Build-Depends:
>> mpich2: libcr-dev
>> openmpi: libcr-dev
>
> These can be built without libcr, and indeed they are on those
> architectures where it is not available.

The library behaves sanely without the kernel module and dropping just
the -dkms package would be my preferred solution. Most binaries that
use BLCR are built to run in environments where the presence of the
kernel part isn't a given. Upstream doesn't have funding at the moment
to add support for newer kernels (they sound like it's something they
hope to return to though) and my attempts at developing a patch were
largely unsuccessful, i.e. worse than no patch at all.

I anticipate that the library itself ought to be useable when such a
patch arrives.

There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package
should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the
future in my view.

Alan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAD2JkJeRD5fZHdiL1tmc4OqTM=gdGt=nn+u6oqffutpuram...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#690468: marked as done (unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:53:49 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690468,
regarding unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package libpst

The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing
/usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink.

Debdiff output is attached.

unblock libpst/0.6.54-4.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in second .changes but not in first
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/748e536800a6dee75025e548e1974fddee40c6.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/2e058929c514976724d4e444c280f5dd864763.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/4c2b251c5b0959b6b5999559ac2b119ad05fac.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/5f/5dbf629070ebfdf06a2576ada5f3e75fe2267f.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a2/69abcdbd49a71e0f73066c494e4049c1aa9eaf.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/fb/1886139f0938b2e82f690b1dda25261ceda6a8.debug

Files in first .changes but not in second
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/00/cf60cabd3f9ab4f2a7430276ae496cf2d2e35e.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/26/4265c69bc7b2c3ba2ecbd7a4a5cb899aec8910.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/08c30ebdf40f66397f7df62134abfeee3c5eab.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/7ea7a1b4d45613efb7e4530774987d5b17654a.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/d5/7055aa2b69233acf3ac6056a553d5aca036451.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ee/718078f41d822058f294e1bc5f55f6c807018f.debug

Control files of package libpst-dev: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4)-] {+0.6.54-4.1)+}
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package libpst4: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package libpst4-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4),-] {+0.6.54-4.1),+} pst-utils
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package pst-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package readpst: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 14.10.2012 17:40, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:

Please unblock package libpst

The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing
/usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink.


Already done earlier today; see #690440.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#690471: unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1

2012-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package tgmochikit.  This version clarifies the
licence status of some files.

diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+tgmochikit (1.4.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Remove the text 'See scriptaculous.js for full license' from
+Sortable.js.  This file (and DragAndDrop.js) is derived from
+scriptaculous-js  which is MIT-licenced
+and compatible with the MIT/AFL dual-licence applied to all the
+Javascript code. (Closes: #689285)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings   Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:46:29 +0100
+
 tgmochikit (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Jakub Wilk ]
diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 MIT for the Python part
 MIT/AFL for the JavaScript part
 
-All Mochikit JavaScript files report "All Rights Reserved". This is, from the
+Most Mochikit JavaScript files report "All Rights Reserved". This is, from the
 point of view of MochiKit upstream, a way to redirect the licensing to the
 LICENSE.txt files that can be found in the distribution root (which dual
 licenses it MIT and AFL). See: http://markmail.org/message/doxccpq5mefweeay
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/trunk/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/trunk/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._module('Sortable', '1.5', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.1/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.1/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.2/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.2/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
 Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
 
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
 ***/
 
 MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position', 
'DragAndDrop']);
--- END ---

unblock tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014165602.30802.94788.report...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk



Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1

2012-10-14 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package libpst

The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing
/usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink.

Debdiff output is attached.

unblock libpst/0.6.54-4.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in second .changes but not in first
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/748e536800a6dee75025e548e1974fddee40c6.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/2e058929c514976724d4e444c280f5dd864763.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/4c2b251c5b0959b6b5999559ac2b119ad05fac.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/5f/5dbf629070ebfdf06a2576ada5f3e75fe2267f.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a2/69abcdbd49a71e0f73066c494e4049c1aa9eaf.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/fb/1886139f0938b2e82f690b1dda25261ceda6a8.debug

Files in first .changes but not in second
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/00/cf60cabd3f9ab4f2a7430276ae496cf2d2e35e.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/26/4265c69bc7b2c3ba2ecbd7a4a5cb899aec8910.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/08c30ebdf40f66397f7df62134abfeee3c5eab.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/7ea7a1b4d45613efb7e4530774987d5b17654a.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/d5/7055aa2b69233acf3ac6056a553d5aca036451.debug
-rw-r--r--  root/root   
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ee/718078f41d822058f294e1bc5f55f6c807018f.debug

Control files of package libpst-dev: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4)-] {+0.6.54-4.1)+}
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package libpst4: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package libpst4-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4),-] {+0.6.54-4.1),+} pst-utils
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package pst-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}

Control files of package readpst: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}


Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

2012-10-14 Thread Yann Leboulanger

On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:

* Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06:

- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look
bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there?

gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged,


FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.



right, but we have a small change in it for logging:
logger = logging.getLogger('gajim.c.gnupg')

And I added an unhandled GPG message from it (full diff is here:
http://paste.gajim.org/view/66412c5c)

I'll open a bug there to add it and will remove it from Gajim sources 
for next release.


--
Yann


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507ae9bb.6050...@lagaule.org



Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

2012-10-14 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:14:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> >We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been
> >working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the
> >delay since then.
> [...]
> >So, what we want to get into Wheezy is:
> >
> >- update libcatalyst-perl to 5.90015 (attached: preliminary
> >  debdiff's from 5.90012-1 to 5.90015-1)
> >- update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility
> >  bugfix -only release)
> >- update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility
> >  bugfix -only release)
> 
> Assuming that the diffs you attached at the time are still current,

libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl and libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl are
unchanged since July, libcatalyst-perl has 2 changes in d/changelog,
closing two additional bugs that were filed since then and are also
fixed by this new version:

#v+
% git diff 2f614ff1e0a0ac93dd00699649c61a79027daf76
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 58b6d3f..4382ca8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -7,11 +7,13 @@ libcatalyst-perl (5.90015-1) unstable; urgency=low
 - fixes the FTBFS in libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl (Closes: #681422)
 - fixes Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace (Closes: #681423)
 - fixes Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie (Closes: #681425)
+- fixes Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding (Closes: #680816)
   * Added myself to Uploaders and Copyright
 
   [ intrigeri ]
   * Drop erroneous and harmful Conflicts/Provides/Replaces
 on libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl.
+Closes: #683656
   * Add Breaks on libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl (<< 0.17) and
 libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl (<< 0.07).
 
#v-

> please go ahead and then file unblock bugs for each package once
> they've been in unstable for a few days. Apologies for the delay in
> getting back to you.

Thanks alot for your work, and sorry for this unpleasant mess!

@intrigeri, are you uploading the packages or do you want me to do it?


Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Kurt Ostbahn: Da Polifka Rudl


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690443: marked as done (RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:20:30 +0100
with message-id <20121014172030.e023481a5d1971c455691...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690443: RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690443,
regarding RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690443
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment
and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing.

libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.

The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl
and libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I
am filing RM bugs as well.

Full rationale:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Please remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:29:06 +0100
Neil Williams  wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> 
> As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment
> and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to
> remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing.
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Closing as libcatalyst-perl is likely to be updated.

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpwYEPHwYs44.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#690446: marked as done (RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:19:40 +0100
with message-id <20121014171940.4e05e6b9564f435a145a3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690446: RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690446,
regarding RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment 
and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing.

libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl

Dependency problem found.

I've also asked for removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl in
#690443, so this dependency problem goes away.

The other parts of this fix relate to 
libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I
am will be filing an RM bug as well.

Full rationale:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Please remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:39:59 +0100
Neil Williams  wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> 
> As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment 
> and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to
> remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Closing as the libcatalyst-perl is likely to be updated.

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpNrCOjyhAxc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#690448: marked as done (RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:18:41 +0100
with message-id <20121014171841.81027d9e00ed7ce5a0dca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690448: RM: 
libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690448,
regarding RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment 
and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing.

libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
gitalist: gitalist-common

# Broken Build-Depends:
gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (>= 0.07)

Dependency problem found.

gitalist: 
$ rmadison gitalist
 gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source
$ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious
681435
665223

So removing libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing
does not affect gitalist and there are no other dependency
issues in testing.

The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl
and libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl for which I have filed RM bugs as well.

Full rationale:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Please remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:51:31 +0100
Neil Williams  wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> 
> As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment 
> and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to
> remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing.

Closing as the libcatalyst-perl package is likely to be updated.

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpFsfqSlXBoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

2012-10-14 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06:
- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix 
only. What's the potential for regression there?

gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged,


FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014161802.ga3...@jwilk.net



Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5

2012-10-14 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5.

This adds Conflicts: doc-base (<< 0.10.3) and closes #652638.

Complete debdiff:

#v+
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog  2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog  2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libuuid-perl (0.02-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/control: conflict on doc-base << 0.10.3 to avoid package
+installation failure due to symbol lookup errors when perl 5.14 and
+libuuid-perl get unpacked and trigger the old doc-base.
+Thanks to Martin Pitt for testing this in Ubuntu, Niko Tyni for the
+initial analysis, and Stuart Prescott for further triaging.
+(Closes: #652638) (LP: #902553)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:09:59 +0200
+
 libuuid-perl (0.02-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ gregor herrmann ]
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 Package: libuuid-perl
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Conflicts: doc-base (<< 0.10.3)
 Description: Perl extension for using UUID interfaces as defined in e2fsprogs
  This is a Perl interface to libuuid from e2fsprogs.  It allows generation,
  parsing, and unparsing of UUIDs.
#v-

unblock libuuid-perl/0.02-5


Thanks in advance,
gregor


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=S4Gt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014161952.24053.62451.report...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at



Bug#690464: pre-approval: dput nmu

2012-10-14 Thread Alberto Á . Fuentes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Dear release team,

There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release
teams and the maintainer has not been very responsive lately.

I was wondering uploading a nmu with the diff attached would be considered
for unblocking and could make it to the wheezy release.

Thank you and please, think of the children.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/dcut.1 dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dcut.1
--- dput-0.9.6.3/dcut.1	2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 +
+++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dcut.1	2012-10-14 16:40:16.0 +0100
@@ -160,6 +160,19 @@
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 .fi
 
+If you've uploaded packages with the --delayed option (uploaded to
+\fBDEFERRED\fR queue), then use the \fBcancel\fR command with a .changes
+file.
+
+.in +4n
+.nf
+$ dcut cancel dput_0.9.4_i386.changes
+.fi
+
+.in
+This creates and uploads a commands file just like the other commands.
+.nf
+
 .SH LICENSE
 This program is distributed under the terms of the Gnu General Public
 License, Version 2 or later.
diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/debian/changelog dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- dput-0.9.6.3/debian/changelog	2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 +
+++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/debian/changelog	2012-10-14 16:22:48.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+dput (0.9.6.3+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Discourage people to upload packages to the wrong archive (Closes: #561678)
+  * Deleted obsolete comment about gluck (Closes: #674585)
+  * Use case and example about dcut added to man page. Thanks
+Hideki Yamane   (Closes: #688871)
+
+ -- Alberto Á. Fuentes   Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:04:37 +0100
+
 dput (0.9.6.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * volatile archive has been discontinued (Closes: #661374)
diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/dput.cf dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dput.cf
--- dput-0.9.6.3/dput.cf	2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 +
+++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dput.cf	2012-10-14 13:54:17.0 +0100
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
 login			= anonymous
 allow_dcut		= 1
 method			= ftp
+# Please, upload your package to the proper archive
+# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload
+allowed_distributions	= (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports)
 
 # http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/05/msg00036.html
 [ftp-eu]
@@ -31,6 +34,9 @@
 incoming		= /pub/UploadQueue/
 login			= anonymous
 allow_dcut		= 1
+# Please, upload your package to the proper archive
+# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload
+allowed_distributions	= (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports)
 
 # http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg7.html
 [ssh-upload]
@@ -40,6 +46,9 @@
 method			= scp
 incoming		= /srv/upload.debian.org/UploadQueue/
 allow_dcut		= 1
+# Please, upload your package to the proper archive
+# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload
+allowed_distributions	= (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports)
 
 # And if you want to override one of the defaults, add it here.
 # For example, comment out the next line
@@ -72,9 +81,6 @@
 incoming		= /pub/Incoming/upload
 login			= anonymous
 
-### Delayed Upload queue will move off gluck.
-### please use [ftp-master] (aka ftp.upload.debian.org)
-
 [backports]
 fqdn			= backports-master.debian.org
 method			= ftp


Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

2012-10-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 28.08.2012 20:07, intrigeri wrote:
the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and 
currently

in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819,
#680829, #680826, #665222).

We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been
working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the
delay since then.

[...]

So, what we want to get into Wheezy is:

- update libcatalyst-perl to 5.90015 (attached: preliminary
  debdiff's from 5.90012-1 to 5.90015-1)
- update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility
  bugfix -only release)
- update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility
  bugfix -only release)


Assuming that the diffs you attached at the time are still current, 
please go ahead and then file unblock bugs for each package once they've 
been in unstable for a few days. Apologies for the delay in getting back 
to you.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cec2e1e6a7e436416695ac2ec0138...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

2012-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
> > #638339).  It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but
> > it cannot now be released in wheezy.  Therefore please remove
> > from testing only.
> 
> As mentioned at the BSP, the library has several reverse dependencies. 
> Do we know whether dropping the kernel module and keeping the libraries 
> would work? (CCing the maintainer).

I'm not familiar with the package but from the description it appears
that the library is only an interface to the kernel module, thus it
won't be usable with current kernel packages.

The changelog states that:

  * blcr-dkms still lacks support for 2.6.39/3.x kernels, but is useful to:
- Users running newer kernels with stable
- Users running older kernels with testing/unstable
- Developers working on support for newer kernels

However I don't think that any longterm kernel series older than 2.6.39
will be supported for the lifetime of wheezy.  Further, userland
packages in jessie will be allowed to assume a kernel version of 3.2 or
later, so the next upgrade may fail badly.

If the interface between the library and kernel module is stable (though
I suspect not...) then the library might be usable with an updated
module when that arrives.  Then it would seem reasonable to include the
library only in wheezy.  But if not then I don't think either belongs in
the release.

[...]
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> mpich2: libcr-dev
> openmpi: libcr-dev

These can be built without libcr, and indeed they are on those
architectures where it is not available.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

2012-10-14 Thread Yann Leboulanger

On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:


Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package gajim

A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0]
More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing
list: [1]
debdif is available here: [2]

[0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682598
[1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/09/msg00042.html
[2]: http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/gajim-0.15.1.debdiff

unblock gajim/0.15.1-1


A few comments:
- the source format change is not appropriate


It's because it was in format 3.0 previously (Gajim 0.14.4), and for 
0.15 I did something wrong that I wanted to repair. Moreover, I need to 
add a patch for your next point (change to _StreamCB) and it's nicer  in 
format 3.0. If you really want, I can re-do the patch in old format.



- why does this drop the 0.15-1.1 changelog entry?


hmm I didn't do this upload so it was not in my debian files. I've 
re-added it.



- what does the src/common/check_X509.py change do?  string comparison
   and version comparison are kind of different things...


Gajim 0.15 badly checks openssl version. see 
https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7124



- how is the change to _StreamCB supposed to work?  there doesn't seem
   to be an 'obj' variable in that function


It does not work. Oauth2 is not in 0.15 branch, so not usefull. But ok, 
I've added a patch to remove that.



- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix
   only.  What's the potential for regression there?


gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged, it's why it is 
in Gajim sources (it's in Gajim repos too). I've take the new release 
from there. It's in Gajim trunk since May, 18, and don't cause any trouble.
Of course I've read the changes, and I don't see anything that could 
cause a problem.



Overall I think I'm ok with the farstream/farsight change but I'm not so
sure about the rest.  At least without some more explanations why
they're necessary.


Thanks for the comments, I hope I explained what you wanted to know, 
else don't hesitate to ask.


I've re-build a new package available here:
http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/

I'll ask a debian developper to upload it as soon as you tell me it's ok 
(or you prefer it to be uploaded now? )


--
Yann


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507ae31d.8040...@lagaule.org



Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7

2012-10-14 Thread Anton Gladky
I am not agreed with that and asked adding wheezy-ignore tag
to the bug 617613 [1].

We are not able to add a relicensed opencascade version
on this freeze-stage. But in general the problem seems to be
resolved and new version will hopefully be packaged after the
wheezy-release.

Anton

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#163


2012/10/14 Ben Hutchings :
> freecad contains GPLv2 code and links to OCTPL (non-GPL-compatible)
> libraries (bug #617613)/ This is supposed to be fixed soon as there is
> a new version of libopencascade under a BSD licence
> .
>
> Since the relicensed libopencascade is not available in Debian and
> probably will not get into wheezy, I think freecad should be removed
> from stable and testing.
>
> Ben.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJmkJf8VY_B-5oObQPW23b0rrfgzgf=ayta4r2qbwfm...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7

2012-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

freecad contains GPLv2 code and links to OCTPL (non-GPL-compatible)
libraries (bug #617613)/ This is supposed to be fixed soon as there is
a new version of libopencascade under a BSD licence
.

Since the relicensed libopencascade is not available in Debian and
probably will not get into wheezy, I think freecad should be removed
from stable and testing.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014153121.29195.74835.report...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk



Processed: Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690458 [release.debian.org] RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
690458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b690458.1350228408668.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

2012-10-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:

blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
#638339).  It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but
it cannot now be released in wheezy.  Therefore please remove
from testing only.


As mentioned at the BSP, the library has several reverse dependencies. 
Do we know whether dropping the kernel module and keeping the libraries 
would work? (CCing the maintainer).


# Broken Depends:
gromacs: gromacs-mpich [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
hdf5: libhdf5-mpich2-7 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
meep-lam4: libmeep-lam4-6 [amd64]
   meep-lam4 [amd64]
meep-mpi-default: libmeep-mpi-default6 [amd64]
  meep-mpi-default [amd64]
meep-mpich2: libmeep-mpich2-6 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
 meep-mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
mpich2: libmpich2-3 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
libmpich2-dev [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
netpipe: netpipe-mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
openmpi: openmpi-checkpoint [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
python-scientific: mpich2python [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]
yorick: yorick-mpy-mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc]

# Broken Build-Depends:
mpich2: libcr-dev
openmpi: libcr-dev

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/5305e860002cdbc4d26b67f20b164...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#689156: marked as done (unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-2)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:15:41 +0100
with message-id <1b9f97b0150ff0bcaf2b304389b0e...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689156: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689156,
regarding unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mediawiki

This upload follows on both the threads for better MW 1.19 support
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release/56559
and the multiple security issues (Debian #686330) part:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.secure-testing.general/5325

The changes can be split into multiple parts. The security issues
were fixed by the new upstream version, which I’ll detail below.
First are the changes inside debian/ which I’ll show as diffs
between the _patched_ sources again (like with mksh) because
diffs between "3.0 (quilt)" diffs are harder to read, except:

The file debian/patches/texvc_location.patch was removed, but it
was already not used in 1.19.1-1. The following patches were added
and have been attached to this message and removed from the diff:
fix_invalid_xhtml.patch, fix_warnings.patch

First, the packaging changes: add myself to Uploaders; do not
replace the jquery-tablesorter shipped with MW by the one in
Debian again because the MW one is a different/patched codebase
(fixes #687519); update Breaks wrt. the isochronal uploads of
src:fusionforge and src:mediawiki-exensions (for which I’ll also
file an unblock request); and Jonathan had added two Recommends.
I added a few “chmod +x” to quieten lintian and removed a COPYING
file from the .deb file after verifying its contents were already
in debian/copyright (which they were).

--- mediawiki-1.19.2-0/debian/changelog 2012-06-18 17:17:26.0 +0200
+++ mediawiki-1.19.2-1/debian/changelog 2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
+mediawiki (1:1.19.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Thorsten Glaser ]
+  * New upstream: security fixes for CVE-2012-4377, CVE-2012-4378,
+CVE-2012-4379, CVE-2012-4380, CVE-2012-4381, CVE-2012-4382
+(Closes: #686330)
+  * Prevent  without any  inside, globally
+  * Fix more cases of not checking $wgHtml5
+  * MW’s ID (XML) sanitiser is there for a reason, use it!
+  * Prevent  without any  inside in MonoBook
+  * Fix invalid XHTML caused by code not honouring $wgHtml5
+  * Quell some PHP warnings from sloppy code
+  * Do the wfSuppressWarnings patch used with FusionForge right
+  * Add myself to Uploaders and quieten lintian a bit
+  * Do not replace patched jquery-tablesorter with unpatched one;
+unbreaks sortable tables (Closes: #687519)
+  * Update versioned Breaks against fusionforge and mw-extensions
+
+  [ Jonathan Wiltshire ]
+  * Add Recommends on mediawiki-extensions-base and php-wikidiff2
+
+ -- Thorsten Glaser   Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:40:12 +0200
+
 mediawiki (1:1.19.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream bug fix release
--- mediawiki-1.19.2-0/debian/control   2012-06-18 16:31:31.0 +0200
+++ mediawiki-1.19.2-1/debian/control   2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Source: mediawiki
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Mediawiki Maintenance Team 

-Uploaders: Romain Beauxis , Jonathan Wiltshire 

+Uploaders: Romain Beauxis , Jonathan Wiltshire 
, Thorsten Glaser 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
  dh-buildinfo,
  ocaml-nox | ocaml, xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, po-debconf
@@ -13,10 +13,19 @@ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/views
 
 Package: mediawiki
 Architecture: all
-Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5, php5-mysql | php5-pgsql | php5-sqlite, 
mime-support, libjs-jquery, libjs-jquery-tipsy, libjs-jquery-cookie, 
libjs-jquery-form, libjs-jquery-tablesorter, ${misc:Depends} 
-Recommends: mysql-server | postgresql-contrib, php5-cli, python
+Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5, php5-mysql | php5-pgsql | php5-sqlite, 
mime-support, libjs-jquery, libjs-jquery-tipsy, libjs-jquery-cookie, 
libjs-jquery-form, ${misc:Depends}
+Recommends: mysql-server | postgresql-contrib, php5-cli, python, 
php-wikidiff2,  mediawiki-extensions-base
 Suggests: imagemagick | php5-gd, mediawiki-math, memcached, clamav
-Breaks: fusionforge-plugin-mediawiki (<< 5.2~rc1-4~)
+Breaks: fusionforge-plugin-mediawiki (<< 5.2~rc1+1~),
+ mediawiki-extensions-base (<< 2.8~),
+ mediawi

Bug#689157: marked as done (unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.9)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:14:30 +0100
with message-id <4885fbf38b5b700a51d07c1c81b70...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689157: unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #689157,
regarding unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689157: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689157
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mediawiki-extensions

This unblock request also comes as a follow-up to the thread at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release/56559
as discusses earlier.

As for diffs: mediawiki-extensions/2.7 was the first version to
properly work with MediaWiki 1.19, 2.6 and below were for 1.15,
and, despite some trickery leading to 2.6+wheezy1, are not at
all suitable for it (I said in #686190 that it was just the be‐
ginning, and #687641 being filed proved me right).

Furthermore, mediawiki-extensions/2.7 was waiting for migration
to testing for more than 60 (sixty) days already, depending in‐
directly on nodejs due to ECMAscript compression and one of the
affected libraries being a dependency¹, and the JS packagers as
well as I were under the impression, all the time, that we could
have this fixed for wheezy, until being told, IMO much too late,
that this would not be accepted. So I respectfully ask that the
Release Team consider mediawiki-extensions/2.7 already accepted
and just not transitioned due to misinformation.

① As it turns out, that dependency was not even needed in the
  end; the 2.8 upload removes it. But I was left in good faith
  that 2.7 would transition as-is, and we could fix all follow-
  up problems later.

Therefore I consider the upgrade to MW-Extensions 2.8 critical
to the release (as otherwise, peoples’ wikis will either not
work at all and/or show weird error messages, or, if the media‐
wiki/1:1.19.2-1 upload is accepted, their extensions will find
themselves deinstalled, which will make them unhappy, and pos‐
sibly also break their installations).

As for the fixes happening between 2.7 and 2.8, they occurred
during preparing the integration of FusionForge and MW 1.19 in
a semi-production environment. The RSS_Reader extension was
fully broken, PageCSS produced spurious text in wiki pages,
and Collection and InputBox produced invalid XHTML. The diff,
again with quilt patches applied instead of showing a diff
between unidiffs, follows:

--- mediawiki-extensions-2.7/debian/changelog   2012-06-29 17:55:21.0 
+0200
+++ mediawiki-extensions-2.8/debian/changelog   2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+mediawiki-extensions (2.8) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Remove dependency of mw-ext-collection on various ECMAscript
+libraries that apparently are available from MW core already
+(as log message for r87847 suggests); enables testing transition
+  * Fix paths in RSS_Reader extension
+  * Quell those UNIQ‥QINU texts by fixing PageCSS to honour the API
+  * Fix content-less ul element in Collection extension
+  * Fix invalid XHTML in InputBox extension
+
+ -- Thorsten Glaser   Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:40:12 +0200
+
 mediawiki-extensions (2.7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Target MediaWiki 1.19
--- mediawiki-extensions-2.7/debian/control 2012-06-29 17:55:21.0 
+0200
+++ mediawiki-extensions-2.8/debian/control 2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 
+0200
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ Description: Extensions for MediaWiki --
 
 Package: mediawiki-extensions-collection
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, mediawiki-extensions-base,
- libjs-jquery, libjs-jquery-ui, libjs-json, php5-curl
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, mediawiki-extensions-base, php5-curl
 Description: Extensions for MediaWiki -- Collection extension
  This package provides the mediawiki extensions for
  creating books using collections of pages.
--- mediawiki-extensions-2.7/debian/control.in  2012-06-29 17:50:22.0 
+0200
+++ mediawiki-extensions-2.8/debian/control.in  2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 
+0200
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ Description: Extensions for MediaWiki --
 
 Package: mediawiki-extensions-collection
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, mediawiki-extensions-base,
- libjs-jquery, libjs-jquery-ui, libjs-json, php5-curl
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, mediawiki-extensions-base, php5-curl
 Description: Extensions for MediaWiki -- Collection extension
  This package provides the mediawiki extension

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

2012-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
#638339).  It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but
it cannot now be released in wheezy.  Therefore please remove
from testing only.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014150942.28672.19984.report...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk



Bug#689361: marked as done (unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:03:10 +0100
with message-id <490cce03024190b85d6e541815595...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689361: unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689361,
regarding unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689361
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello,

Please unblock package at-spi2-atk

unblock at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2

Upstream has fixed a lot of reference leaks (which would translate into
memory leaks in applications, including long-running ones such as the
desktop).  These are recorded in patches/leak*.

In addition, bug #688094 shows that at-spi2-atk leaves a lot of sockets
in the user's home directory, and even root-owned ones for gksu
applications. This is mitigated by the two upstream fixes recorded in
patches/socket*

Lastly, there are a couple translation updates in patches/lv and
patches/pl

Samuel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
Samuel
 argh, pi est plus grand que 2. Ca casse tout
 -+- #ens-mim -+-
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog  2012-06-29 04:35:37.0 +0200
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog  2012-09-30 17:46:16.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+at-spi2-atk (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * patches/leak*: Cherry-pick from upstream: fix reference leaks.
+  * patches/socket*: Cherry-pick from upstream: mitigate at-spi socket
+creation. (Closes: #688094)
+  * patches/lv: Cherry-pick from upstream: lv translation update.
+  * patches/pl: Cherry-pick from upstream: pl translation update.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault   Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:28:06 +0200
+
 at-spi2-atk (2.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Samuel Thibault ]
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1 
at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1  2012-09-30 17:30:26.0 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+commit e4a899792e389b9d733f1a74702a8f4158f93acc
+Author: Cosimo Cecchi 
+Date:   Mon Jul 2 16:14:12 2012 -0400
+
+atk-adaptor: plug a refcount leak
+
+https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679285
+
+diff --git a/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c 
b/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
+index 25d7823..77aacbb 100644
+--- a/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
 b/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
+@@ -337,6 +337,8 @@ impl_GetRelationSet (DBusConnection * bus,
+ }
+   dbus_message_iter_close_container (&iter, &iter_array);
+ oom:
++  if (set)
++g_object_unref (set);
+   // TODO: handle out of memory */
+   return reply;
+ }
+
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2 
at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2  2012-09-30 17:30:31.0 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+commit 246c99e7f62d5009d5bd4b09c491b74afddae9a6
+Author: Cosimo Cecchi 
+Date:   Mon Jul 2 16:14:48 2012 -0400
+
+atk-adaptor: plug a refcount leak
+
+https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679285
+
+diff --git a/atk-adaptor/event.c b/atk-adaptor/event.c
+index d19f451..1cbda23 100644
+--- a/atk-adaptor/event.c
 b/atk-adaptor/event.c
+@@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ children_changed_event_listener (GSignalInvocationHint * 
signal_hint,
+ detail1);
+   emit_event (accessible, ITF_EVENT_OBJECT, name, minor, detail1, detail2,
+   "(so)", ao, append_object);
++  g_object_unref (ao);
+ }
+   else
+ {
+
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3 
at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3  2012-09-30 17:30:34.0 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+commit d1e52eb847dcabf7a2be07dbd71cfcb4e0805306
+Author: Cosimo Cecchi 
+Date:   Thu

Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

2012-10-14 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:

> The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to
> be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative
> solution for Wheezy.

Thanks for looking into this; but I'd rather have an opinion from the
release team before we start to remove half of Catalyst from wheezy
(and leaving the other half in a broken state).
 
> The one problematic bug is #680826 in
> libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl

I don't think so ...
 
> gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl
> are problems for fixing #680826.
> 
> However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that
> particular bug was to be fixed either.
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html
 
... because it builds fine against the new Catalyst:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680826#13
(also mentioned in the above mail)

Cheers,
gregor 
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: R.E.M.: All The Way To Reno


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690457: RM: twidge/1.0.8.1+nmu1

2012-10-14 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

twidge needs to be migrated to a modified hoauth API but the
RC bug #665254 has had no maintainer input since it was
opened in March. (Maintainer is also upstream.)

Please remove twidge from testing.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014143243.21077.39863.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp



Bug#690448: RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1

2012-10-14 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment 
and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing.

libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
gitalist: gitalist-common

# Broken Build-Depends:
gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (>= 0.07)

Dependency problem found.

gitalist: 
$ rmadison gitalist
 gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source
$ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious
681435
665223

So removing libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing
does not affect gitalist and there are no other dependency
issues in testing.

The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl
and libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl for which I have filed RM bugs as well.

Full rationale:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Please remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014125131.18788.16766.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp



Bug#690447: unblock: libphone-ui/1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1

2012-10-14 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock this NMU, uploaded to delayed/2. There is an nmudiff in the
bug #690150.

Thanks,


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files

2012-10-14 Thread Andreas Barth
* Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org) [121014 12:44]:
> Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org):
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
> > incomplete copyright files.  Some examples:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/690394
> > http://bugs.debian.org/690371
> > http://bugs.debian.org/690370
> > 
> > Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness
> > is useful, but with so many packages embedding so much code from
> > various sources, I think in the end we're going to find most of the
> > archive affected.  So, I'm wondering if the release team's opinion
> > concurs with serious severity, or if these can be downgraded to
> > important to avoid further delaying wheezy?
> 
> 
> Not wearing a release team hat, but it is my feeling that such deep
> nitpicking is certainly wished in the long termbut also helps very
> well in delaying the release of wheezy.
> 
> No offense intended to Jakub's work, far from that. We certainly need
> people doing such archive-wide reviews of things that are often
> neglected.

Basically setting an bug to RC grade means: "It is better to delay the
release of Debian (or remove this package) then to ship as it is".

If the bug is already present in stable, an minor error in the copyright
file shouldn't mean that as we're not making anything worse. If the
bug is new, and it is an real issue (like the copyright file saying
"this code is public domain", but in reality it is GPL3), then it
sounds RC grade to me. If it is rather an minor glitch, then indeed it
still should be fixed, but it's not serious enough to stop the
release, i.e. the severity should be important.

(I had always translated "serious" with "we cannot do that", and
"important" with "we should be really ashamed". That worked very
well.)



Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014124827.gi26...@mails.so.argh.org



Bug#690446: RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1

2012-10-14 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment 
and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing.

libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl

Dependency problem found.

I've also asked for removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl in
#690443, so this dependency problem goes away.

The other parts of this fix relate to 
libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I
am will be filing an RM bug as well.

Full rationale:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Please remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014123959.18219.4713.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp



Bug#690442: marked as done (unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:28:57 +0100
with message-id <3487a849f110d468597f7dfbc8653...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690442: unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690442,
regarding unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at all, just
removing all the past release files from the package.

It would help, if the package would be packaged an an upstream package, using
-.

cairo-5c (1.8.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer Upload.
  * Repack 1.8 without including all the binary and source files
of all previous releases. Closes: #688056.
  * Update config.{guess,sub}. Closes: #536837.
  * Set package section to libs.
  * Build with hardening flags.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 14.10.2012 13:19, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at 
all, just

removing all the past release files from the package.


Unblocked earlier today; thanks.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#690443: RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1

2012-10-14 Thread Neil Williams
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment
and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing.

libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.

The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl
and libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I
am filing RM bugs as well.

Full rationale:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html

Please remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014122906.17649.1300.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp



Bug#690442: unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1

2012-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at all, just
removing all the past release files from the package.

It would help, if the package would be packaged an an upstream package, using
-.

cairo-5c (1.8.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer Upload.
  * Repack 1.8 without including all the binary and source files
of all previous releases. Closes: #688056.
  * Update config.{guess,sub}. Closes: #536837.
  * Set package section to libs.
  * Build with hardening flags.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507aadce.3070...@debian.org



Bug#690440: marked as done (unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:59 +0100
with message-id <102ebeee0ec4f989dfadc729dfdf3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690440: unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690440,
regarding unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for
PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog
--- libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog	2012-06-30 19:58:51.0 +0200
+++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog	2012-09-30 19:12:46.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+libpst (0.6.54-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)":
+readpst: fix directory to symlink upgrade in postinst.
+(Closes: #687879)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:12:22 +0200
+
 libpst (0.6.54-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Jordi Mallach ]
diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst
--- libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst	2012-09-30 19:19:33.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir="/usr/share/doc/readpst"
+if [ -d $docdir ] && [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+if rmdir $docdir 2>/dev/null; then
+ln -sf pst-utils $docdir
+fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 14.10.2012 12:52, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for
PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached.


Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

2012-10-14 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:07:24 +0200
intrigeri  wrote:

> the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and currently
> in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819,
> #680829, #680826, #665222).

Agreed.
 
> We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been
> working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the
> delay since then.
> 
> Scope: three currently buggy packages are directly under the radar as
> far as freeze block/unblock decisions are concerned
> (libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl, libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and
> libcatalyst-perl), and a few others are directly concerned due to
> being broken by the versions of libcatalyst-perl currently in testing
> and unstable.

The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to
be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative
solution for Wheezy.

An alternative solution would be:

0: RM libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl
libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.

Removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl possible.

Closes: #680829 (Severity: serious)

1: RM libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl
libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl

Dependency problem found.

Dependency problem goes away due to 0:

Removal of libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl possible.

Closes: #680819 (Severity: serious)

2: RM libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl
libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
gitalist: gitalist-common

# Broken Build-Depends:
gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (>= 0.07)

Dependency problem found.

gitalist: 
$ rmadison gitalist
 gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source
$ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious
681435
665223

Removal of libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl possible.

Closes: #680843

3: RM gitalist
gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | source
gitalist-common | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | all
gitalist-fastcgi | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | all
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.

Closes: #681435
Closes: #665223

Not in testing. Worth removing from unstable?

> - update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility
>   bugfix -only release)

Instead: RM

> - update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility
>   bugfix -only release)

Instead: RM

+ libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl, possibly remove gitalist
from unstable.

I'll file the three RM bugs against release.debian.org (for removal
from testing only) later today. I haven't decided whether it's worth
removing gitalist at this stage.

The one problematic bug is #680826 in
libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl

libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl | 0.57-1 | source, all
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
libcatalyst-modules-perl: libcatalyst-modules-perl

# Broken Build-Depends:
gitalist: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl
libcatalyst-modules-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl
libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl:
libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libmojomojo-perl:
libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl

gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl
are problems for fixing #680826.

However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that
particular bug was to be fixed either.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html


-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpboIuxC3cCc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

2012-10-14 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:17:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 13:02:12 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed
> > > > #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly
> > > > on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to
> > > > enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good
> > > > user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these
> > > > setups after upgrading to Wheezy.
> > > > 
> > > What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf
> > > inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's
> > > stuff?
> > 
> > This unblock request is about fixing an upgrade issue. As far as I know,
> > no bugs have ever been reported against dropbear about preventing other
> > package's hooks to work. If dropbear was stomping on some feet, it was
> > already doing it in Squeeze.
> > 
> Touching nsswitch.conf is new in your patch afaict.

Would you like me to perform another upload removing the line creating
/etc/nsswitch.conf? I don't really see the need, but it can surely be
done.

-- 
Jérémy Bobbio.''`. 
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'` 
  `-   


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690440: unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1

2012-10-14 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for
PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog
--- libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog	2012-06-30 19:58:51.0 +0200
+++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog	2012-09-30 19:12:46.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+libpst (0.6.54-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)":
+readpst: fix directory to symlink upgrade in postinst.
+(Closes: #687879)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:12:22 +0200
+
 libpst (0.6.54-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Jordi Mallach ]
diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst
--- libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst	2012-09-30 19:19:33.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir="/usr/share/doc/readpst"
+if [ -d $docdir ] && [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+if rmdir $docdir 2>/dev/null; then
+ln -sf pst-utils $docdir
+fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#685597: marked as done (unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:19:18 +0100
with message-id <61813d4ea4746ba53bc743a895350...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685597: unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #685597,
regarding unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685597: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary is
not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in other
packages are needed.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 13.10.2012 23:30, Philipp Kern wrote:

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:09:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out 
ppl-config binary is
> not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build 
dependencies in other

> packages are needed.
Has it been verified that they build correctly against a 
multi-arched

libppl?


Both have built successfully on zelenka against the following libppl:

ii libppl-c4:s390   0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (C 
interface)
ii libppl0.11-dev:s390  0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library 
(development)

ii libppl9:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library
(runtime library)


Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---


Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
Also, fuck Gerrit's mail bouncing with C/R crap.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 13:02:12 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed
> > > #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly
> > > on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to
> > > enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good
> > > user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these
> > > setups after upgrading to Wheezy.
> > > 
> > What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf
> > inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's
> > stuff?
> 
> This unblock request is about fixing an upgrade issue. As far as I know,
> no bugs have ever been reported against dropbear about preventing other
> package's hooks to work. If dropbear was stomping on some feet, it was
> already doing it in Squeeze.
> 
Touching nsswitch.conf is new in your patch afaict.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

2012-10-14 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed
> > #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly
> > on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to
> > enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good
> > user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these
> > setups after upgrading to Wheezy.
> > 
> What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf
> inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's
> stuff?

This unblock request is about fixing an upgrade issue. As far as I know,
no bugs have ever been reported against dropbear about preventing other
package's hooks to work. If dropbear was stomping on some feet, it was
already doing it in Squeeze.

If you have suggestions on how to get the guarantees you seek, I'd be
happy to hear them. But I don't think thriving for perfect should leave
user systems unbootable (or hard to boot).

-- 
Jérémy Bobbio.''`. 
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'` 
  `-   


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7

2012-10-14 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
2012/9/3 Michael Vogt :
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:24:24PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> > ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti:
>> >
>> > > Julian Andres Klode  (30/07/2012):
>> > > > Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and
>> > > > many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new
>> > > > module (apt.auth) which is a cleaned up version of an internal
>> > > > software-properties module (and not used by any code in unstable
>> > > > AFAIK).
>> > >
>> > > Then I'm not sure we need or want this new module in wheezy…
>> >
>> > Should this new module be rolled back and a new python-apt release
>> > produced just for Wheezy, then?
>>
>> How about adding a warning to the module that it is experimental? I'd
>> like to avoid rolling back stuff we already have in newer. Otherwise,
>> we could upload a 0.8.8 with a disabled module as well, but that might
>> create problems later on with merging Ubuntu packages that depend on
>> python-apt (>= 0.8.5) and expect apt.auth to be there.
>>
>> We could also create a 0.8.4.1 release for testing, by branching off
>> unstable's 0.8.7, merging the changelog entries for 0.8.5, 0.8.6,
>> and 0.8.7 into 0.8.4.1, and removing apt.auth mentions, and disabling
>> or removing that module. But that is a bit more work. We could also
>> name 0.8.4.1 as 0.8.4+wheezy1, but given that unstable is past 0.8.4
>> already, just using 0.8.4.X instead of 0.8.4+wheezyX seems a bit
>> nicer.
>
> I created a branch at
> http://anonscm.debian.org/bzr/bzr/apt/python-apt/debian-wheezy/ that
> is based on the debian-sid branch but disables auth.py. I am happy to
> upload this to wheezy if that approach is approved by the release
> team.

Release Team:

A separate branch was created for Wheezy and a debdiff submitted. Is
there anything else missing to move this issue forward and achieve a
concensus about what will be allowed into Testing?

Regards,
Martin-Éric


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/capzxpqfl645_hax3aem5tdxaksqbgm0nppp0vcn4bsbfpda...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:44:33 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed
> #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly
> on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to
> enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good
> user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these
> setups after upgrading to Wheezy.
> 
What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf
inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's
stuff?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files

2012-10-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org):
> Hi,
> 
> Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
> incomplete copyright files.  Some examples:
> http://bugs.debian.org/690394
> http://bugs.debian.org/690371
> http://bugs.debian.org/690370
> 
> Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness
> is useful, but with so many packages embedding so much code from
> various sources, I think in the end we're going to find most of the
> archive affected.  So, I'm wondering if the release team's opinion
> concurs with serious severity, or if these can be downgraded to
> important to avoid further delaying wheezy?


Not wearing a release team hat, but it is my feeling that such deep
nitpicking is certainly wished in the long termbut also helps very
well in delaying the release of wheezy.

No offense intended to Jakub's work, far from that. We certainly need
people doing such archive-wide reviews of things that are often
neglected.

But we also need to *release* from time to time.otherwise the
prediction hidden in one of my latest blog posts
(http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/10/09#69) will be more and
more true.

It is probably not the moment anymore to do archive-wide mass bug
filing with RC severity except for FTBFS issues.





signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:

> Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't
> really want transition sasl right now.
> 
Agreed that this patch is not acceptable.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-6

2012-10-14 Thread Daniel Leidert
Please

unblock gnupg/1.4.12-6

The last upload did not fix #685627 as it did not trigger a rebuild of
the .gmo file(s). The upload of gnupg/1.4.12-6 will fix that.

Regards, Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350209845.6339.2.ca...@haktar.debian.wgdd.de



Re: Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 13.10.2012 23:15, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
>Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as
>it's also
>deprecated, and adding VCS headers).

On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However:

>+  * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4

The d-d-a mail announcing the release of policy 3.9.4 specifically
asked people *not* to do that.


oh sorry about that; will upload with S-V set to 3.9.3 then.


You could just have not bumped it at all instead. ;-) Approve hint 
added.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/c6447bb49b7dd8b40d0e5692a9635...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#690419: marked as done (unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:12:50 +0200
with message-id <20121014101250.gb17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690419,
regarding unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package iceweasel

10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security
updates for the extended support branch.

unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:45:11 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package iceweasel
> 
> 10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security
> updates for the extended support branch.
> 
> unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1
> 
Hint added.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#690424: unblock: node/0.3.2-7.2

2012-10-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package node

I've just uploaded an NMU which implements only the changes requested
by the TC for the rename to stop the clash with nodejs. Reviewed
already by several folks at a BSP here. Please unblock.

unblock node/0.3.2-7.2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u node-0.3.2/Makefile node-0.3.2/Makefile
--- node-0.3.2/Makefile
+++ node-0.3.2/Makefile
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 installbin: all
 	install -m 755 -o root -g root -d		 $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
-	install -m 4755 -s -o root -g root node		 $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
+	install -m 4755 -s -o root -g root node	 	 $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)/ax25-node
 	install -m 755  -s -o root -g root nodeusers	 $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
 
 installhelp:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
 	install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.conf.5  $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man5
 	install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.perms.5 $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man5
 	install -m 755	  -o root -g root -d $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8
-	install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.8   $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8
+	install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.8  	 $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8/ax25-node.8
 
 clean:
 	rm -f *.o *~ *.bak *.orig
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/rules node-0.3.2/debian/rules
--- node-0.3.2/debian/rules
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/rules
@@ -42,8 +42,13 @@
 	dh_installdirs
 
 	# Add here commands to install the package into debian/node.
-	$(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/node/
+	$(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/ax25-node/
 
+	# Set up symlinks in the transitional package
+	mkdir -p debian/node/usr/sbin
+	ln -s ax25-node debian/node/usr/sbin/node
+	mkdir -p debian/node/usr/share/man/man8
+	ln -s ax25-node.8 debian/node/usr/share/man/man8/node.8
 
 # Build architecture-independent files here.
 binary-indep: build install
@@ -61,7 +66,7 @@
 #	dh_installpam
 #	dh_installinit
 #	dh_installcron
-	dh_installmanpages
+	dh_installmanpages -p ax25-node
 #	dh_installinfo
 #	dh_undocumented
 	dh_installchangelogs 
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/control node-0.3.2/debian/control
--- node-0.3.2/debian/control
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/control
@@ -9,8 +9,17 @@
-Package: node
+Package: ax25-node
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, update-inetd, openbsd-inetd|inet-superserver
 Description: Amateur Packet Radio Node program
- The node program accepts TCP/IP and packet radio network connections and
+ The ax25-node program accepts TCP/IP and packet radio network connections and
  presents users with an interface that allows them to make gateway connections
  to remote hosts using a variety of amateur radio protocols.
 
+Package: node
+Priority: extra
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ax25-node
+Conflicts: nodejs-legacy
+Section: oldlibs
+Description: Amateur Packet Radio Node program (transitional package)
+ The existing node package has been renamed to ax25-node. This transitional
+ package exists to ease the upgrade path for existing users.
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/changelog node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
--- node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+node (0.3.2-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU
+  * Implement the tech committee decision to fix the node/nodejs name
+clash (Closes: #681361):
++ Rename the existing "node" binary package to "ax25-node"
++ Rename the /usr/sbin/node binary in that package to
+  /usr/sbin/ax25-node
++ Add a new "node" transitional package which depends on "ax25-node"
+  and conflicts with "nodejs-legacy".
+
+ -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>  Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:37:37 +0100
+
 node (0.3.2-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Retiring - remove myself from the uploaders list.
reverted:
--- node-0.3.2/debian/postinst
+++ node-0.3.2.orig/debian/postinst
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh
-# postinst script for node
-#
-# see: dh_installdeb(1)
-
-set -e
-
-# summary of how this script can be called:
-#*  `configure' 
-#*  `abort-upgrade' 
-#*  `abort-remove' `in-favour' 
-#  
-#*  `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour'
-#`removing'
-#   
-# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/
-#
-# quoting from the policy:
-# Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the
-# post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional
-# so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's
-# installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade',
-# `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'.
-
-case "$1" in
-install|upgrade|configure)
-update-inetd --add \
-"bbs\tstream\ttcp\twait\troot\t/usr/sbin/node\tnode"
-update-inetd --disable bbs
-;;
-
- 

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

2012-10-14 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed
#630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly
on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to
enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good
user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these
setups after upgrading to Wheezy.

Thanks for your hard work!

Hint:

unblock dropbear/2012.55-1.2

-- 
Jérémy Bobbio.''`. 
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'` 
  `-   
diff -u dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog
--- dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog
+++ dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+dropbear (2012.55-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Unbreak initramfs hook when upgrading from Squeeze.
+
+ -- Jérémy Bobbio   Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:53:18 +0200
+
+dropbear (2012.55-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Adjust initramfs hook to work with multi-arch. Initial patch by
+Michael Stapelberg. (Closes: #630581)
+
+ -- Jérémy Bobbio   Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:17:06 +0200
+
 dropbear (2012.55-1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -u dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook
--- dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook
+++ dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook
@@ -27,7 +27,11 @@
 	else
 		rm -f "${DESTDIR}/sbin/dropbear"
 		copy_exec "/usr/sbin/dropbear" "/sbin/"
-		cp /lib/libnss_* "${DESTDIR}/lib/"
+		LIBC_DIR=$(ldd /usr/sbin/dropbear | sed -n -e 's,.* => \(/lib.*\)/libc\.so\..*,\1,p')
+		for so in $(find "${LIBC_DIR}" -name 'libnss_compat*'); do
+			copy_exec "${so}" "${LIBC_DIR}"
+		done
+		echo 'passwd: compat' > "${DESTDIR}/etc/nsswitch.conf"
 		echo "root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/sh" > "${DESTDIR}/etc/passwd"
 		for keytype in "dss" "rsa"; do
 			if [ ! -f "/etc/initramfs-tools/etc/dropbear/dropbear_${keytype}_host_key" ]; then


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#681717: unblock: openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.4

2012-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:59:37 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:

> > Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging
> > the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug
> > version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug).  So I don't
> > think this is a problem.
> 
> Please review the attached patch, and let me know if it is ok to
> upload to unstable.  The security issue is fixed, and the tool
> binaries are now not excluded from the -dbg package.
> 
Go ahead.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name

2012-10-14 Thread Ondřej Surý
And your patch is wrong, you have bumped soname, but left the package
name same, which is even more wrong the this subtle breakage in the
first place.

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ondřej Surý  wrote:
> Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't
> really want transition sasl right now.
>
> The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal
> library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already
> fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition.
>
> Debian release might have different opinion though, but if not I
> suggest to set this as wheezy-ignore.
>
> O.
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michael Gilbert  wrote:
>> control: tag -1 patch
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5.  Please let me
>> know if I should delay longer.  See attached patch.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Mike
>>
>> ___
>> Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list
>> pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Ondřej Surý 



-- 
Ondřej Surý 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caljhhg92fv2bafpoj-sxacrvvsp5exvfshnxrdw2frtwb5b...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name

2012-10-14 Thread Ondřej Surý
Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't
really want transition sasl right now.

The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal
library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already
fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition.

Debian release might have different opinion though, but if not I
suggest to set this as wheezy-ignore.

O.

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michael Gilbert  wrote:
> control: tag -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5.  Please let me
> know if I should delay longer.  See attached patch.
>
> Best wishes,
> Mike
>
> ___
> Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list
> pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel



-- 
Ondřej Surý 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG-rvBABWLqWsOnMO+pk9hMy_jogu=ypxu0zbpyc6b6...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1

2012-10-14 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package iceweasel

10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security
updates for the extended support branch.

unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20121014074511.24785.57313.report...@jigen.glandium.org



Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 
> > Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the
> > iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will
> > automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an
> > idea.
> > 
> What does that even mean?

When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically
get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first
time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of
iceweasel, version bumps also require new packages for xulrunner and
libmozjs, and that prevents automatic upgrades: iceweasel's is kept
back by apt. Default apt preferences for the iceweasel packages would
ensure stable users that use backports sources will always get the
latest.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014074143.ga24...@glandium.org



Bug#688391: marked as done (unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:27:12 +0200
with message-id <507a6950.1090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#688391: unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688391,
regarding unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock caribou for translation updates and a pair of bugfixes.

caribou (0.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Stop overriding OnlyShowIn from upstream. Closes: #679102.
  * New upstream translation/bugfix release.

The diff for non-autogenerated parts is attached. (The actual diff is 
big because upstream changed the vala compiler version used.)

unblock caribou/0.4.4-1

Thanks,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
  `-
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/configure.ac caribou-0.4.4/configure.ac
--- caribou-0.4.2/configure.ac	2012-03-27 04:31:58.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/configure.ac	2012-09-03 12:11:56.0 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 AC_PREREQ([2.63])
 AC_INIT([caribou],
-[0.4.2],
+[0.4.4],
 [https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=caribou],
 [caribou])
 
@@ -104,9 +104,6 @@
 dnl == intltool check ==
 IT_PROG_INTLTOOL([0.35.0])
 
-dnl == Documentation ==
-GNOME_DOC_INIT
-
 dnl == GObject introspection ==
 GOBJECT_INTROSPECTION_REQUIRE([0.10.7])
 
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/data/antler/style.css caribou-0.4.4/data/antler/style.css
--- caribou-0.4.2/data/antler/style.css	2011-09-03 05:36:58.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/data/antler/style.css	2012-08-03 15:43:47.0 +0200
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
 @define-color group_scan_color2 darker(@group_scan_color1);
 
 .antler-keyboard-button {
-  border-width: 0;
-  border-radius: 2;
-  border-image: url("dark-key-border.svg") 2 2 2 2 repeat stretch;
-  font: Sans 14;
+  border-width: 0px;
+  border-radius: 2px;
+  border-image: url("dark-key-border.svg") 2px 2px 2px 2px repeat stretch;
+  font: Sans 14px;
   background-image: -gtk-gradient (linear,
  left top,
  left bottom,
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/debian/rules caribou-0.4.4/debian/rules
--- caribou-0.4.2/debian/rules	2011-11-21 16:57:04.0 +0100
+++ caribou-0.4.4/debian/rules	2012-06-26 14:17:37.0 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 
 install/caribou::
 	echo "NoDisplay=true" >> debian/tmp/usr/share/applications/caribou.desktop
-	echo "OnlyShowIn=GNOME;" >> debian/tmp/etc/xdg/autostart/caribou-autostart.desktop
 
 DEB_PYTHON2_MODULE_PACKAGES = caribou caribou-antler
 
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/NEWS caribou-0.4.4/NEWS
--- caribou-0.4.2/NEWS	2012-03-27 04:31:46.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/NEWS	2012-09-05 11:26:46.0 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,20 @@
 =
+Version 0.4.4
+=
+- Removed unneeded gnome-doc-utils dependency
+- Bug 683256 - caribou unnecessarily requires pygobject 3.3.3 or up to
+  build
+- Translation updates (Galician, Polish, Vietnamese, Marathi,
+  Gujarati, Bengali)
+
+=
+Version 0.4.3
+=
+- Bug 674344: Not using units is deprecated in gtk CSS is deprecated
+- Update after pygobject bug 676746
+- Translation updates (Norwegian, Greek, Traditional Chinese)
+
+=
 Version 0.4.2
 =
 - Build fixes
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/tools/make_schema.py caribou-0.4.4/tools/make_schema.py
--- caribou-0.4.2/tools/make_schema.py	2011-09-09 17:42:39.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/tools/make_schema.py	2012-09-05 11:17:26.0 +0200
@@ -56,9 +56,19 @@
 key.setAttribute('name', setting.gsettings_key)
 key.setAttribute('type', setting.variant_type)
 schemalist.appendChild(key)
+# pygobject >= 3.3.3 and up expose g_variant_print as
+# "print_". Older pygobjects expose it as "print", which
+# we need to use through getattr as "print" is a keyword.
+#
+# Try the new name first, fall back to the old one if unavailable.
+#
+# Once we depend on pygobject >= 3.4 we can just call
+# setting.gvariant.print_(False) directly.
+printfunc = getattr(setting.gvariant, 'print_', None)
+if printfunc is None:
+printfunc = getattr(setting.gvariant, 'print')
 self._append_children_element_value_pairs(
-doc, key, [('default',
-getattr(setting.gvariant, "print")

Processed: Re: Bug#689351: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 pending d-i
Bug #689351 [release.debian.org] unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2
Added tag(s) d-i and pending.

-- 
689351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689351.135019900627372.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#689351: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2

2012-10-14 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 pending d-i

On 2012-10-01 21:54, maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package klibc
> 
> Has 3 fixes for armhf RC bug, plus security fix for dash
> and a fix for x86 cross building.
> 
> See the diff:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 

Unblocked klibc/2.0.1-3, though unblock-udeb pending d-i approval.

Thanks,
~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507a66d5.6010...@thykier.net



Processed: Re: Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending d-i
Bug #688512 [release.debian.org] unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1
Added tag(s) d-i and pending.

-- 
688512: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688512
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688512.135019870125463.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-10-14 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tag -1 pending d-i

On 2012-10-06 02:44, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I have just uploaded version 2.33.12+really2.32.4-2 because of a
> security vulnerability:
> 
> glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Revert link adding for gdbus-object-manager-example. While it is 
> useful to have in /usr/share/doc as an example, it must not be 
> shipped with the system documentation.
>   * 20_glib-compile-resources_leak.patch: new patch. Fix a leak 
> introduced in version 2.32.4. Thanks Niels Thykier!
>   * SECURITY: add 11_CVE-2012-3524_setuid.patch from upstream. Prevents 
> using DBus in a setuid binary. Fixes CVE-2012-3524.
> 
> Attached is the diff between -1 and -2.
> 
> Cheers,

Unblock added, unblock-udeb pending d-i approval.

Thanks,
~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507a65a6.2090...@thykier.net



Bug#689691: marked as done (unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1)

2012-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:08:41 +0200
with message-id <507a64f9.1030...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689691: unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689691,
regarding unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal

Please unblock package php-letodms-core

The current letodms version in testing (3.3.4-1) has some
important security vulnerabilities. 
New php-letodms-core-3.3.9-1 fixes all these issues.


unblock php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1

Thank you,

Regards,
Francisco.

-- 
Francisco M. García Claramonte 
Debian GNU/Linux Developer 
GPG: public key ID 556ABA51
http://people.debian.org/~francisco/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-10-08 17:37, Francisco Manuel Garcia Claramonte wrote:
> Hi Niels, Thanks for your support.
> 
> I comment below.
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> I have prepared a diff file from my GIT Debian development copy 
> (just local copy). It shows all changes from 3.3.4-1 to 3.3.9-1 
> [1].
> 
> I have prepared another diff file with main changes, removed some
> unneeded diffs (in files as example), to easy review [2].
> 
> And a full debdiff [3] file. Much harder to review.
> 
> Please tell me if you need anything else, or I can help you in some
> way.
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://people.debian.org/~francisco/letodms/php-letodms-core_3.3.4--3.3.9.git.diff
>
>  [2] 
> http://people.debian.org/~francisco/letodms/php-letodms-core_3.3.4--3.3.9.git-main_changes.diff
>
>  [3] 
> http://people.debian.org/~francisco/letodms/php-letodms-core_3.3.4--3.3.9.debdiff
>
>  Regards, Francisco
> 
> 
> 

[1] and [2] where much much better than the full debdiff [3].

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels--- End Message ---