Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread David Meggy
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1

On startup it quickly kills my console and I never get
an X-window server.  Logging in remotely and running
dmesg, I get the following at the end
snip
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.9.0 20020828 on minor 0
agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at
:00:00.0.
agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :00:00.0 into 1x
mode
agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :01:00.0 into 1x
mode
[drm:radeon_cp_load_microcode] *ERROR* Firmware file
r200_cp_microcode not available.
/snip

If I try to kill the X process I still don't get my
console back.

Other useful information:
I'm running Debian Sid, using the 2.6-k7 kernel
package, and this problem started after my daily
update this evening which would be the early hours of
April 30 GMT

David

__ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca



Bug#233001:

2004-04-30 Thread Ian Maclaine-cross
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86

X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   20 2004-04-30 13:19 /etc/X11/X - 
/usr/bin/X11/XFree86
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root  1742316 2004-03-18 16:42 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86
/var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum does not exist.

Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster:
xserver-xfree86

VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
:00:08.0 VGA compatible controller: Tseng Labs Inc ET4000/W32p rev C
:00:08.0 Class 0300: 100c:3206

XFree86 X server configuration file status:
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3210 2004-04-30 14:10 
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4:
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using
# values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type man XF86Config-4 at the shell prompt.)
#
# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86
# package.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following commands as root:
#
#   cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom
#   md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4  /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86

Section Files
FontPathunix/:7100# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi
EndSection

Section Module
LoadGLcore
Loadbitmap
Loaddbe
Loadddc
Loaddri
Loadextmod
Loadfreetype
Loadglx
Loadint10
Loadrecord
Loadspeedo
Loadtype1
Loadvbe
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Keyboard
Driver  keyboard
Option  CoreKeyboard
Option  XkbRules  xfree86
Option  XkbModel  pc104
Option  XkbLayout us
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Configured Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  CorePointer
Option  Device/dev/tts/0
Option  Protocol  Microsoft
Option  Emulate3Buttons   true
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  SendCoreEventstrue
Option  Device/dev/input/mice
Option  Protocol  ImPS/2
Option  Emulate3Buttons   true
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  ViewTop_BP-ET4
Driver  tseng
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier  Generic Monitor
HorizSync   30-72
VertRefresh 50-120
Option  DPMS
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier  Default Screen
Device  ViewTop_BP-ET4
Monitor Generic Monitor
DefaultDepth8
SubSection Display
Depth   1
Modes   1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   4
Modes   1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   8
Modes   1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   15
Modes   1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   16
Modes   1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   24
Modes   1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Default Layout
Screen  Default Screen
InputDevice Generic Keyboard
InputDevice Configured Mouse
InputDevice Generic Mouse
EndSection

Section DRI
Mode0666
EndSection


/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 unchanged from checksum in 

Bug#233001: xserver-xfree86: [tseng] ET4000/W32p only works with vesa or vga

2004-04-30 Thread Ian Maclaine-cross
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:20:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 tag 233001 + moreinfo
 thanks
 
 On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:32:25PM +1100, Ian Maclaine-cross wrote:
  Package: xserver-xfree86
  Version: 4.2.1-12.1
  Severity: important
  
  Xfree86 3.3.6 worked with my Tseng ET4000/W32p graphics card but 
  4.2 does not except with a low resolution vesa or vga mode.
 
 Did you *try* the tseng driver instead?

Yes indeed and it did nothing.
 
 Please do so, explain exactly how it appears to fail, and please mail
 this bug number the corresponding XFree86 X server config file and log
 file from when it does not work.
 E.g.,
 
 $ /usr/share/bug/xserver-xfree86  /tmp/output 31
 $ mailx -s Re: Bug#233001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /tmp/output

Done. Please let me know if /tmp/output arrives.
I checked it and it appears correct (ie wrong).

Sorry to be so slow in responding.
Thanks for your good work in tracking down bugs.

 -- 
 G. Branden Robinson| Never attribute to malice that
 Debian GNU/Linux   | which can be adequately explained
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | by stupidity.
 http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Hanlon's Razor



-- 
Regards,
Ian Maclaine-cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key fingerprint = 5F7A 7539 EA0D F4B4 95D3  0D22 A8BB B366 1D1D FB53

This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender and are not 
necessarily the views of UNSW.




Re: x configuration process

2004-04-30 Thread Marc Wilson
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 08:30:17PM -0700, Nick Urban wrote:
 Why does X not attempt to configure itself automatically before asking 
 the user questions?

Depends on whether discover and friends are installed or not.

 The debconf configurator asks lots of questions that many users don't 
 understand or care about. If the user does care, they can always just 
 run `XFree86 -configure' and do some manual editing.

Oh, and doing it that way subjects clueless users to LESS intimidating
questions.  Not.  Branden's configuration method is pretty moron-friendly.

 Does X it normally autoconfigure when working correctly, or is this a
 bigger problem. If it is, can we just steal knoppix autoconfigure system?

Please, no... can we have something that works, instead?

-- 
 Marc Wilson | Money is the root of all wealth.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |



Bug#241014: marked as done (xlibs: AltGr key doesn't work after upgrade to XFree86 4.3.0 when using xfree86/pc105/se/nodeadkeys)

2004-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:54:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#241014: XKB problems after upgrade to 4.3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2004 10:34:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 30 02:34:06 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.114] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8GZK-00029n-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:34:06 -0800
Received: by av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
id 0CEA437EB2; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:33:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net 
[81.228.10.182])
by av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BBB37E5E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:33:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from em2.my.own.domain (h245n2fls301o1037.telia.com [81.227.209.245])
by smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9511337E67
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:33:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from srs by em2.my.own.domain with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8GYr-00053r-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:33:37 +0200
Subject: XKB problems after upgrade to 4.3.0
From: Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:33:37 +0200
Sender: Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: important

I get the errors shown below when starting the X server. One result is
that the alt gr key does not work, making keys like |\~ not to work,
very annoying. For 4.2.x versions the same XF86config-4 file worked
fine.

Error screen in Gnome:
==
Error activating XKB configuration.
Probably internal X server problem.
 
X server version data:
The XFree86 Project, Inc
4031
You are using XFree 4.3.0.
There are known problems with complex XKB configurations.
Try using simpler configuration or taking more fresh version of XFree
software.
If you report this situation as a bug, please include:
- The result of xprop -root | grep XKB
- The result of gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/xkb
 
Parts of /var/log/XFree86.0.log
===

(**) Option XkbRules xfree86
(**) XKB: rules: xfree86
(**) Option XkbModel pc105
(**) XKB: model: pc105
(**) Option XkbLayout se
(**) XKB: layout: se
(**) Option XkbVariant nodeadkeys
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled

Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap
(II) Server_Terminate keybinding not found

xprop -root | grep XKB
_XKB_RULES_NAMES_BACKUP(STRING) = xfree86, pc105, se,
nodeadkeys, 
_XKB_RULES_NAMES(STRING) = xfree86, pc105, se, nodeadkeys, 

gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/xkb
 layouts = [se  nodeadkeys]
 model = pc105
 overrideSettings = false
 options = []


---
Received: (at 241014-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 04:54:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 21:54:53 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJQ33-Mf-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:54:53 -0700
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 424EF6419A; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:54:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:54:52 -0500
From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#241014: XKB problems after upgrade to 4.3.0
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1340 - trunk/debian

2004-04-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-30 00:56:30 -0500 (Fri, 30 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1340

Modified:
   trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add item.

Update SiS driver item.


Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian/TODO   2004-04-29 02:15:52 UTC (rev 1339)
+++ trunk/debian/TODO   2004-04-30 05:56:30 UTC (rev 1340)
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@
   generic ones by fixing upstream Imakeage to not turn extra stuff off when
   the XFree86 X server is not being built (like xmodmap.std).  It ships
   libXxf86vm.a but not the corresponding manpages.
-* Grab SiS driver from HEAD per Thomas Winischhofer.
+* Grab SiS driver from Thomas Winischhofer's website, per his information.
+  Should fix #245249 and #246087.
 * hurd-i386 MANIFEST, and probably some debhelper files, are out of date.
 * Should xc/include/{Xw32defs.h,Xwinsock.h} be installed (and shipped) for
   the benefit of cross-compilers?  Check upstream Imakeage.
@@ -90,6 +91,8 @@
 * #243288: xfree86-common: DebianRed should be in rgb.txt [STALLED awaiting
   more info]
 * #245044: xdm: cannot resolve hostnames from Xaccess Indirect lines
+* #245065: xbase-clients: add an option to let setxkbmap ignore current server
+  settings
 
 Do opportunistically, only in conjuction with other fixes
 -



Re: X and 2.6.5 kernel: update of 2.6.5 kernel locks my laptop

2004-04-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:14:58AM +, slaven peles wrote:
 Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, 
 code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
 Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't 
 access hardware directly.
 Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, 
 code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
 Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't 
 access hardware directly.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:54:24AM -0500, Diego Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
 I have same problem look my log in
 http://uvirtual.ean.edu.co/~derodriguez/kernelprob/XFree86.0.log 

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:52:18PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
 This happens to me, too - Radeon 7000, same kernel.  I filed bug #246587
 against kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686.

Hi guys,

This should be fixed in the version of XFree86 that entered sid on 29
April.

xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
  * Fix AT keyboard rate I/O controls by operating on the actual console file
descriptor, not on file descriptor zero (thanks, Keith Packard).
Suppresses warning messages from Linux 2.6.  (Closes: #224909)
[...]
 -- Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:55:17 +0200

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|I must despise the world which does
Debian GNU/Linux   |not know that music is a higher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |revelation than all wisdom and
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |philosophy. -- Ludwig van Beethoven


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: problem with left-handed mouse on X - is GPM to blame or is it X?

2004-04-30 Thread Branden Robinson
[Zeph Hull dropped from Cc.]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:29:35PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 Given how everyone in this family is left-handed, I recently got around
 inverting the order of the mouse buttons in GPM; works great in console.  
 
 Since GPM is setup as a repeater for X, I thought that X would also end up
 defaulting to inverted button order, but it doesn't.
 
 I haven't found any option in X to configure the button order and Googling
 didn't tell me anything relevant about perhaps selecting a different protocol 
 in
 GPM to get everything working in X the same way it does on console.
 
 Would anybody happen to have a cure for this?

There is information in the Debian X FAQ about this.

/usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz

http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/trunk/debian/local/FAQ

Please let us know if it is insufficient.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|Religion consists in a set of
Debian GNU/Linux   |things which the average man thinks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |he believes and wishes he was
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |certain of.   -- Mark Twain


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#245246: xserver-xfree86: xserver starts but suddenly dies before and windowmanager or similar starts

2004-04-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:02:42PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:57:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
  tag 245246 - moreinfo
  tag 245246 + help
  thanks
  
  On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:24:31PM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
   Branden Robinson schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 um 02:49:07 -0500:

Does the X server stay up if you give it no clients to run?

One way to test this is simply to run X as root.
   
   definitly X, I tried to run 'X' as root, the result is the same.
  
  Okay, it looks like the sunffb driver is definitely busted in testing
  and unstable.
 
 Is this minus the patches that I sent you?

It's minus the one that wouldn't compile.

The other one is part of the package version the submitter is using:

  * Apply patch by David S. Miller to implement support for RGB-BGR
colorspace conversion in the X server's fb layer.
- debian/patches/072_Xserver_fb_convert_RGB_to_BGR.diff

A few weeks ago, I asked for an updated version of the other patch:

  * Apply patch by David S. Miller to implement XAA and Render support
in the sunffb driver.
- debian/patches/073_sunffb_xaa_render_fb_support.diff

If you could get a version to me that will build I'd be happy to apply
it.

However, the missing symbols that are being complained have to do with
DRI and drm, not XAA or Render.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux   |   I met a man who wasn't there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   He wasn't there again today,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |   I think he's from the CIA.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#243081: xserver-xfree86: dpms blanking behaves erracticaly

2004-04-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 04:44:08PM -0700, Tyler Riddle wrote:
 I switched monitors and the behavior changed a little.
 Instead of oscilating between off and on states it now
 displays about 5 seconds of strange lines, I believe
 the sync rates to be pretty wild. Then the new monitor
 will turn off. I also tried switching cards after
 changing monitors, both cards had the same behavior.
 
 The current card is a brand new nVidia Geforce 3d card
 using the nVidia drivers. Finaly, the same behavior
 was observed under freebsd previously on this
 computer, with the Rage video card and the original
 monitor.

Thanks for following up.

Do these monitors claim to support DPMS?  As I understand it, DPMS
signaling is done very crudely, by turning off the horizontal and
vertical sync signals in various combinations to indicate standby,
sleep, and off.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debian GNU/Linux   | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | test would pass it just fine.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan Benson


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#246642: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad

2004-04-30 Thread Aron Trauring

Package:  xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: critical

Description of problem:

When X starts up, it goes into an infinite loop, spewing out the 
following error message in the log file endlessly, until / is filled up:


(EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020
(EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP start -1020
(EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020
(EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine...

The full log file is attached (I delete the endless reptitions so file will be 
of reasonable size).

Also attached please find the XFree86 configuration file. 


Since my system is configured to start gdm upon boot-up, and since this causes 
an infinite loop of error messages,
essentially the system is inoperable. I need to ssh in and kill the X server, 
but then I no longer have access to the
console window on the notebook.


Software/Hardware configuration:

The system is running kernel 2.6.5-3-686 and is running on an IBM Thinkpad r32 and uses Debian unstable. 
I have been running X fine until I upgraded to the newest version of the X files that include the dfsg extension.

I attach a file of Debian packages installed on the system which are probably 
relevant in some way.

Thanks for your attention to this bug.







This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way.  Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository
(http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs).

XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 20040428170728 [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Release Date: 15 August 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.23 i686 [ELF] 
Build Date: 28 April 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
OS Kernel: Linux version 2.6.5-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.3 
(Debian 20040401)) #1 Tue Apr 27 23:39:55 EST 2004 
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Fri Apr 30 01:20:28 2004
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
(==) ServerLayout Default Layout
(**) |--Screen Default Screen (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor IBM LCD
(**) |   |--Device ATI Radeon Mobility
(**) |--Input Device Generic Keyboard
(**) Option XkbRules xfree86
(**) XKB: rules: xfree86
(**) Option XkbModel pc104
(**) XKB: model: pc104
(**) Option XkbLayout us
(**) XKB: layout: us
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(**) |--Input Device Configured Mouse
(**) |--Input Device Generic Mouse
(WW) The directory /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in /usr/share/fonts/truetype.
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/share/fonts/truetype).
(**) FontPath set to 
unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/share/fonts/type1/psfonts,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi
(==) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
(==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
(++) using VT number 7

(WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device)
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: bitmap
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: pcidata
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6
(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8002483c, mode1Res1 = 0x8000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,1a30 card 1014,0521 rev 04 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 8086,1a31 card , rev 04 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1d:0: chip 8086,2482 card 1014,0521 rev 02 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:1d:1: chip 8086,2484 card 1014,0521 rev 02 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1d:2: chip 8086,2487 card 1014,0521 rev 02 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,2448 card , rev 42 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,248c card , rev 02 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) 

Re: Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
reassign 246627 kernel-source-2.6.5
stop

Hi all,

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, David Meggy wrote:

 On startup it quickly kills my console and I never get an X-window
 server.  Logging in remotely and running dmesg, I get the following at
 the end.

[SNIP]

 [drm] Initialized radeon 1.9.0 20020828 on minor 0
 agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at :00:00.0.
 agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :00:00.0 into 1x mode
 agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :01:00.0 into 1x mode
 [drm:radeon_cp_load_microcode] *ERROR* Firmware file r200_cp_microcode not 
 available.

[SNIP]

 Other useful information:
 I'm running Debian Sid, using the 2.6-k7 kernel
 package, and this problem started after my daily
 update this evening which would be the early hours of
 April 30 GMT

With the last X update, some non-free code has been revomed, and source
patched accordingly. X itself does not handle the load of the microcode to
the board, the kernel does (therefor i am reassigning the bug).

For completness I did a check on the radeon code inside X and there is no
reference to radeon_cp_load_microcode or similar calls. On the other side
that can be spotted inside the kernel at:

kernel-source-2.6.5-2.6.5/drivers/char/drm/radeon_cp.c:675

/* Load the microcode for the CP */
static void radeon_cp_load_microcode( drm_radeon_private_t *dev_priv )
[SNIP]


that is called twice in the same file. Specifically at lines 1258 for
radeon_do_init_cp and 1339 for radeon_do_resume_cp.

X uses these two functions via ioctl but cannot disable the
radeon_cp_load_microcode itself.

Herbert, would you be so kind to take a look at this patch?

--- radeon_cp.c.orig2004-04-30 06:50:24.0 +
+++ radeon_cp.c 2004-04-30 06:51:02.0 +
@@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@
radeon_set_pcigart( dev_priv, 1 );
}

-   radeon_cp_load_microcode( dev_priv );
+   /* radeon_cp_load_microcode( dev_priv ); */
radeon_cp_init_ring_buffer( dev, dev_priv );

dev_priv-last_buf = 0;
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@
radeon_set_pcigart( dev_priv, 1 );
}

-   radeon_cp_load_microcode( dev_priv );
+   /* radeon_cp_load_microcode( dev_priv ); */
radeon_cp_init_ring_buffer( dev, dev_priv );

radeon_do_engine_reset( dev );

It should be able to fix the problem but i cannot test it myself since I
lack that kind of hardware.

Thanks a lot
Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Bug#246643: _XPollfdCacheDel: select(s) forever when used with fglrx.

2004-04-30 Thread Mike Mestnik
Package: libx11-6
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: normal

(gdb) bt
#0  0x403e3398 in select () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x4018de32 in _XPollfdCacheDel () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#2  0x4018eda1 in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#3  0x4093c2d9 in s5943 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#4  0x40950593 in s3197 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#5  0x4094d984 in s3176 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#6  0x4094ccff in s5118 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#7  0x4094d02a in __driCreateScreen () from
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#8  0x40123fda in AllocAndFetchScreenConfigs () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1

I also got this bt with DRI installed, but they do not replace libX11.so.
(gdb) bt
#0  0x4027d398 in select () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x40103e32 in _XPollfdCacheDel () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#2  0x40104da1 in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#3  0x407dc2d9 in s5943 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#4  0x407f0593 in s3197 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#5  0x407ed984 in s3176 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#6  0x407eccff in s5118 () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
#7  0x407ed02a in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (980, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libx11-6 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xfree86-common  4.3.0-7  X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
ii  xlibs-data  4.3.0-7  X Window System client data

-- no debconf information



Re: Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:53:41AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
 It should be able to fix the problem but i cannot test it myself since I
 lack that kind of hardware.

I can test any of these patches, but I doubt stuff like 3D will work if
this microcode is actually needed! This would be really, really, really
bad if we can do neither 3D nor acceleration. If this is the case, and
the GR goes ahead, IMO radeon_cp must be stuffed back in.

Next time we need a more thorough analysis, not just 'I don't think this
file gets used much anywhere'. That includes testing on the relevant
hardware: I have a Radeon 9000 which can be used for testing Radeon
stuff, but I just assumed it had been tested when it was asserted that
it was thoroughly unnecessary.

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:53:41AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
  It should be able to fix the problem but i cannot test it myself since I
  lack that kind of hardware.

 I can test any of these patches,

Please do so!

 but I doubt stuff like 3D will work if this microcode is actually
 needed! This would be really, really, really bad if we can do neither 3D
 nor acceleration.

Yes these was mentioned on debian-x. Sorry i don't have the message
reference handy.

 Next time we need a more thorough analysis, not just 'I don't think this
 file gets used much anywhere'. That includes testing on the relevant
 hardware: I have a Radeon 9000 which can be used for testing Radeon
 stuff, but I just assumed it had been tested when it was asserted that
 it was thoroughly unnecessary.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-200404/msg00955.html

I did call for testers after we changed/removed the code from X but there
have no replies to it. I assumed that noone had problems with it.

Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Bug#246642: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad

2004-04-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:15:54AM -0400, Aron Trauring wrote:
 When X starts up, it goes into an infinite loop, spewing out the 
 following error message in the log file endlessly, until / is filled up:
 
 (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020
 (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP start -1020
 (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020
 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine...

Oh my. I'm willing to bet this is another CP microcode issue; some cards
are known to ship with bad firmware (IIRC), or exist in such a state
that they're useless with microcode.

This is all a mixture of IIRC and AIUI, and I'll try to test .dfsg when
I get home (dialup sucks), but yeah. It looks like we've crippled
radeon_drv. :(

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Adding a keyboard to Xfree

2004-04-30 Thread Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Hi!

Warning: This might be a packaging issue only.

I developed my own keyboard mapping for XKB (based on my keyboard,
however I did add a lot of fancy chars that I needed so type spanish,
italian and other european languages on a regular basis via AltGr+key,
I could fit in most of latin-9 charset).

To have it work fully, I had to manually edit /etc/X11/xkb/symbols.dir.
However, this means each upgrade is slightly annoying (asking me wether
I want to replace .../symbols.dir with the provided version).

I would also like to package my keyboard, to deploy it on a large
number of computers. The modification of symbols.dir would therefore
be unpractical and against the Debian packaging rules (no conffile
should be modified by two packages).

How could I solve this? Any idea?
-- 
JCD



Processed: Re: Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 246627 kernel-source-2.6.5
Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `kernel-source-2.6.5'.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Re: x configuration process

2004-04-30 Thread Nick Urban

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 08:30:17PM -0700, Nick Urban wrote:
 

Why does X not attempt to configure itself automatically before asking 
the user questions?
   



Depends on whether discover and friends are installed or not.

 

Okay, well I'm pretty sure discover and friends are installed by 
default, and I was still prompted with questions during my sarge install.
For some things I was given the option of auto-detection, but with the 
values it came up with for my monitor config, I seemed to be limited 
more than I should have been.


The debconf configurator asks lots of questions that many users don't 
understand or care about. If the user does care, they can always just 
run `XFree86 -configure' and do some manual editing.
   



Oh, and doing it that way subjects clueless users to LESS intimidating
questions.  Not.  Branden's configuration method is pretty moron-friendly.

 

The point I was trying to make is that there are basically two classes 
of users, those who know how to set up X and those who don't. The former 
don't need the debconf interface, and the latter don't understand it. 
I'm not suggesting that those who don't understand debconf would 
understand XF86Config.


In any case, the system should at least try to autodetect everything and 
only prompt the user if it fails... is this currently what it does?



Does X it normally autoconfigure when working correctly, or is this a
bigger problem. If it is, can we just steal knoppix autoconfigure system?
   



Please, no... can we have something that works, instead?

 


All I know is that in my testing, it always worked with no hassles.
In what way does knoppix autodetection not work?

I'm not writing just to complain. There seem to be autodetection schemes 
out there that work, and I'd like to help Debian make use of them if 
possible.


Nick




Bug#246663: xserver-xfree86: new version in sid won't start

2004-04-30 Thread Marco Herrn
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid

Since my apt-get upgrade yesterday, X refuses to start with the message:

   *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not
   *** be the reason for the server aborting.

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting

There were some message about symbols that couldn't be found. These had
to do with GLCore and speedo. I reinstalled xserver-common and
xserver-xfree86 and now these messages are gone, but X still refuses to
start.

Marco



-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86

/var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum does not exist.

X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   20 2002-02-12 16:50 /etc/X11/X - 
/usr/bin/X11/XFree86
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root  1743788 2004-04-28 20:23 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86

Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster:
xserver-xfree86

VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 
04)
:01:05.0 Class 0300: 102b:0525 (rev 04)

/var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum does not exist.

XFree86 X server configuration file status:
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3123 2004-04-30 10:46 
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4:
Section ServerLayout
Identifier Matrox PowerDesk configured.
Screen Display 1 0 0
InputDeviceGeneric Keyboard
InputDeviceConfigured Mouse
EndSection

Section Files
FontPath unix/:7100
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID
#   FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi
FontPath /usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi
EndSection

Section Module
Load  bitmap
Load  dbe
Load  ddc
#   Load  dri
Load  extmod
Load  freetype
#   Load  glx
Load  int10
Load  record
#   Load  speedo
Load  type1
Load  vbe
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Keyboard
Driver  keyboard
Option  CoreKeyboard
Option  XkbRules xfree86
Option  XkbModel pc105
Option  XkbLayout de
Option  XkbVariant nodeadkeys
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Configured Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  CorePointer
Option  Device /dev/gpmdata
Option  Protocol IntelliMouse
Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier   Display 1
HorizSync30.0 - 96.0
VertRefresh  50.0 - 160.0
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 147.6 1280 1368 1528 1728 960 970 
973 1005 +hsync +vsync
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 94.5 1024 1088 1184 1376 768 769 772 
808 +hsync +vsync
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 157.5 1280 1368 1528 1728 1024 1025 
1028 1072 +hsync +vsync
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0(1) 157.5 1280 1368 1528 1728 1024 
1025 1028 1072 +hsync +vsync
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0(2) 157.5 1280 1368 1528 1728 1024 
1025 1028 1072 +hsync +vsync
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0(1) 94.5 1024 1080 1176 1376 768 769 
772 808 +hsync +vsync
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 56.3 800 840 904 1048 600 601 604 
631 +hsync +vsync
Option   DPMS
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  MATROX CARD 1
Driver  mga
BusID   PCI:1:5:0
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier Display 1
Device MATROX CARD 1
MonitorDisplay 1
DefaultDepth 16
SubSection Display
Depth 1
Modes1280x960 1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth 4
Modes1280x960 1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth 8
Modes[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 1152x864 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 
1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth 15
Modes1280x960 1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth 16
Modes[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 1152x864 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 
1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth 24
Modes[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 1152x864 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 
1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section DRI
Mode 0666
EndSection



XFree86 X server log files on system:
-rw-r--r--1 

Bug#246671: xserver-xfree86: Never gives up on CP GetBuffer.

2004-04-30 Thread Mike Mestnik
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: normal

I use :3 for my GL Layout, I also cut back the logfile as it was 183MB.
Fglrx workes fine with your Xserver.  It's only when I try to run withought it
that I think I need DRI's.  I also use MergedFB, the DRI project is building
out of Mesa CVS now so we may soon see the end of there 'X' binary and 2d
drivers.  It's important that we get all these intercompatibilitys sorted
out, if only for the sake of consitancy.

-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86

X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   20 Oct 28  2003 /etc/X11/X - 
/usr/bin/X11/XFree86
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root  1742316 Mar 17 23:42 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum.

Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster:
xserver-xfree86

VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R200 QL 
[Radeon 8500 LE]
:01:05.0 Class 0300: 1002:514c

XFree86 X server configuration file status:
-rw-r--r--1 root root16758 Apr 30 03:27 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4:
Section Files
RgbPath  /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
ModulePath   /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc
FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1
FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled
FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled
FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi
FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi
EndSection

Section Module
Load  dbe
SubSection  extmod
  Optionomit xfree86-dga   # don't initialise the DGA extension
EndSubSection
#   Load  record
#   Load  xtrap
Load  type1
Load  freetype
Load  glx
Load  dri
EndSection

Section DRI
Mode0660
Group   video
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Keyboard
Driver  keyboard
Option  CoreKeyboard
Option  XkbRules  xfree86
Option  XkbModel  pc104
Option  XkbLayout us
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Configured Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  CorePointer
Option  Device/dev/input/mouse0
Option  Protocol  ImPS/2
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5
EndSection

Section Monitor
# EDID version 1 revision 2
# Block type: 2:0 3:ff
# Block type: 2:0 3:fd
# Block type: 2:0 3:fc
Identifier PF775
VendorName VSC
ModelName PF775
# Block type: 2:0 3:ff
# Block type: 2:0 3:fd
HorizSync 25-97
VertRefresh 50-180
# Max dot clock (video bandwidth) 200 MHz

# Added by Cheako
DisplaySize 330 240

# Block type: 2:0 3:fc
# DPMS capabilities: Active off:yes  Suspend:yes  Standby:yes

Mode1024x768  # vfreq 84.997Hz, hfreq 68.677kHz
DotClock94.50
HTimings1024 1072 1168 1376
VTimings768 769 772 808
Flags   +HSync +VSync
EndMode
# Block type: 2:0 3:ff
# Block type: 2:0 3:fd
# Block type: 2:0 3:fc

# Added for NES and other emulators.
Mode[EMAIL PROTECTED] # vfreq 60Hz, hfreq 30.68kHz
DotClock21.96
HTimings256  276  316  352
VTimings240  244  249  257
Flags   doublescan
EndMode
Mode[EMAIL PROTECTED] # vfreq 120Hz, hfreq 61.01kHz
DotClock10.31
HTimings256  280  296  336
VTimings240  241  244  253
Flags   doublescan
EndMode
EndSection

Section Monitor
# EDID version 1 revision 1
# Block type: 2:0 3:ff
# Block type: 2:0 3:fc
Identifier CPD-200ES
VendorName SNY
ModelName CPD-200ES
# Block type: 2:0 3:ff
# Block type: 2:0 3:fc
# Block type: 2:0 3:fd
DisplaySize 330 240
HorizSync 30-70
VertRefresh 50-120
# Max dot clock not given
# DPMS capabilities: Active off:yes  Suspend:yes  Standby:yes

Mode640x480   # vfreq 59.952Hz, hfreq 31.475kHz
DotClock25.18
HTimings640 656 752 800
VTimings480 490 492 525
Flags   -HSync -VSync
EndMode
# Block type: 2:0 3:ff
# Block type: 2:0 3:fc
# Block type: 2:0 3:fd
EndSection

#
# Here is where the fun startes, Multipuls of every thing.
#
Section Device
Identifier  

If X refuses to start with Radeon chip...

2004-04-30 Thread Herbert Xu
Then please upgrade your kernel to 2.6.5-4 or above.

The 2.6.5-3 release contained code which attempted to load firmware
for Radeon/R128 from userspace that fails miserably when the firmware
files aren't available.

This has been reverted for now.

I apologise for any inconvenience caused.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



Re: problem with left-handed mouse on X - is GPM to blame or is it X?

2004-04-30 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:29:35PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 Given how everyone in this family is left-handed, I recently got around
 inverting the order of the mouse buttons in GPM; works great in console.  
 
 Since GPM is setup as a repeater for X, I thought that X would also end up
 defaulting to inverted button order, but it doesn't.
 
 repeat_type=raw
 type=imps2

 Section InputDevice
 Option  Device/dev/gpmdata
 Option  Protocol  ImPS/2
 EndSection

impolite rant removed

This is user error.

The raw repeat type is something that I am beginning to think is more of
a bug then a feature, it does a byte for byte repeat, making no changes
to the byte stream.

Further more, it seems to be most commonly used with the PS/2 protocols,
which, is another rant about two-way communications on a FIFO.

Kill the repeat type, have X read from /dev/input/mice as well, and use
xmodmap in your ~/.xsession.

-- 
1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D  5727 4453 008B E65A 7801
CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested.

VOICE MODE=Pitr
So, you are thinking am Communist ? Deal, Comerade !
/VOICE
  -- Chris on ASR.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: X and 2.6.5 kernel: update of 2.6.5 kernel locks my laptop

2004-04-30 Thread slaven peles
On April 30, 2004 06:00 am, Branden Robinson wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:14:58AM +, slaven peles wrote:
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated
  set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It
  shouldn't access hardware directly.
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated
  set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It
  shouldn't access hardware directly.

 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:54:24AM -0500, Diego Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
  I have same problem look my log in
  http://uvirtual.ean.edu.co/~derodriguez/kernelprob/XFree86.0.log

 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:52:18PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
  This happens to me, too - Radeon 7000, same kernel.  I filed bug #246587
  against kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686.

 Hi guys,

 This should be fixed in the version of XFree86 that entered sid on 29
 April.

 xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 [...]
   * Fix AT keyboard rate I/O controls by operating on the actual console
 file descriptor, not on file descriptor zero (thanks, Keith Packard).
 Suppresses warning messages from Linux 2.6.  (Closes: #224909) [...]
  -- Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:55:17
 +0200

I checked my older logs and this error message showed up before. So this bug 
appears to be benign. It seems that the problem here is that Radeon firmware 
was removed from kernel. In README.Debian.1st file that comes with 
kernel-image package I found this:

Non-free bits removed:
(...)
* R128 firmware:
  . drivers/char/drm/r128_cce.c
* Radeon firmware:
  . drivers/char/drm/radeon_cp.c

No workaround was suggested, and there was no warning about possible 
consequences. Perhaps using kernel modules from Michael Daenzer's repository 
would be a good transitional solution? Alternatively, one can always turn off 
dri.

Cheers,
Slaven



Re: Re: Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread Josh Metzler

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:


On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:


On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:53:41AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
 It should be able to fix the problem but i cannot test it myself since I
 lack that kind of hardware.

I can test any of these patches,


Please do so!


but I doubt stuff like 3D will work if this microcode is actually
needed! This would be really, really, really bad if we can do neither 3D
nor acceleration.


Yes these was mentioned on debian-x. Sorry i don't have the message
reference handy.


Next time we need a more thorough analysis, not just 'I don't think this
file gets used much anywhere'. That includes testing on the relevant
hardware: I have a Radeon 9000 which can be used for testing Radeon
stuff, but I just assumed it had been tested when it was asserted that
it was thoroughly unnecessary.


http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-200404/msg00955.html

I did call for testers after we changed/removed the code from X but there
have no replies to it. I assumed that noone had problems with it.

Fabio


This is not a problem with the new XFree86.  It works fine with Debian 
kernel version 2.6.5-2.  Non-free firmware was also pulled from the 
Debian kernel starting in version 2.6.5-3, and that is what causes this 
problem.  See bug #246587 against kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686.


It would be nice, though, if X didn't lockup using 100% cpu in this 
situation.


Josh



Bug#240581: Did you forget about this patch?

2004-04-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi!

I thought this patch would be applied on the new upload, but it seems it
wasn't, I have reworked it again so that it applies well against the new
packages and I'm sending it again to see if we have better luck next time
;-)

Regards...
-- 
Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net

diff -r -u xc.orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c 
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c
--- xc.orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c 
2004-04-30 14:04:58.0 +0200
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c  2004-04-30 
13:59:44.0 +0200
@@ -149,7 +149,8 @@
 OPTION_CLONE_HSYNC,
 OPTION_CLONE_VREFRESH,
 OPTION_FBDEV,
-OPTION_VIDEO_KEY
+OPTION_VIDEO_KEY,
+OPTION_MIN_DOTCLOCK
 } RADEONOpts;
 
 const OptionInfoRec RADEONOptions[] = {
@@ -180,6 +181,7 @@
 { OPTION_CLONE_VREFRESH, CloneVRefresh,OPTV_ANYSTR,  {0}, FALSE },
 { OPTION_FBDEV,  UseFBDev, OPTV_BOOLEAN, {0}, FALSE },
 { OPTION_VIDEO_KEY,  VideoKey, OPTV_INTEGER, {0}, FALSE },
+{ OPTION_MIN_DOTCLOCK,   ForceMinDotClock, OPTV_FREQ,{0}, FALSE },
 { -1,NULL,   OPTV_NONE,{0}, FALSE }
 };
 
@@ -1728,6 +1730,7 @@
 RADEONPLLPtr   pll  = info-pll;
 CARD16 bios_header;
 CARD16 pll_info_block;
+double min_dotclock;
 
 if (!info-VBIOS) {
 
@@ -1782,6 +1785,26 @@
pll-xclk   = RADEON_BIOS16(pll_info_block + 0x08);
 }
 
+/* (Some?) Radeon BIOSes seem too lie about their minimum dot
+ * clocks.  Allow users to override the detected minimum dot clock
+ * value (e.g., and allow it to be suitable for TV sets).
+ */
+if (xf86GetOptValFreq(info-Options, OPTION_MIN_DOTCLOCK,
+ OPTUNITS_MHZ, min_dotclock)) {
+   if (min_dotclock  12 || min_dotclock*100 = pll-max_pll_freq) {
+   xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
+  Illegal minimum dotclock specified %.2f MHz 
+  (option ignored)\n,
+  min_dotclock);
+   } else {
+   xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
+  Forced minimum dotclock to %.2f MHz 
+  (instead of detected %.2f MHz)\n,
+  min_dotclock, ((double)pll-min_pll_freq/1000));
+   pll-min_pll_freq = min_dotclock * 1000;
+   }
+}
+
 xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
   PLL parameters: rf=%d rd=%d min=%d max=%d; xclk=%d\n,
   pll-reference_freq,
diff -r -u xc.orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man 
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man
--- xc.orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man  2004-04-30 
14:04:58.0 +0200
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man   2004-04-30 
13:59:44.0 +0200
@@ -235,6 +235,17 @@
 but not work correctly in some rare cases, hence the default is
 .B off.
 
+.TP
+.BI Option \*qForceMinDotClock\*q \*q frequency \*q
+Override minimum dot clock. Some Radeon BIOSes report a minimum dot
+clock unsuitable (too high) for use with television sets even when they
+actually can produce lower dot clocks. If this is the case you can
+override the value here.
+.B Note that using this option may damage your hardware.
+You have been warned. The
+.B frequency
+parameter may be specified as a float value with standard suffixes like
+k, kHz, M, MHz.
 
 .SH SEE ALSO
 XFree86(1), XF86Config(__filemansuffix__), xf86config(1), Xserver(1), 
X(__miscmansuffix__)




Re: Re: X and 2.6.5 kernel: update of 2.6.5 kernel locks my laptop

2004-04-30 Thread Josh Metzler

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:14:58AM +, slaven peles wrote:
Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, 
code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't 
access hardware directly.
Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, 
code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't 
access hardware directly.


On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:54:24AM -0500, Diego Enrique Rodriguez wrote:

I have same problem look my log in
http://uvirtual.ean.edu.co/~derodriguez/kernelprob/XFree86.0.log 


On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:52:18PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:

This happens to me, too - Radeon 7000, same kernel.  I filed bug #246587
against kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686.


Hi guys,

This should be fixed in the version of XFree86 that entered sid on 29
April.

xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
  * Fix AT keyboard rate I/O controls by operating on the actual console file
descriptor, not on file descriptor zero (thanks, Keith Packard).
Suppresses warning messages from Linux 2.6.  (Closes: #224909)
[...]
 -- Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:55:17 +0200



Thanks, but slaven misdiagnosed the cause of the problem.  These atkbd.c 
errors are unrelated to it (though may be the errors Diego was talking 
about).  The removal of the non-free radeon firmware from the kernel 
causes the X server to lock up using 100% cpu (and to fill up 
XFree86.0.log with error messages).  I was able to ssh into my box and 
reboot it, so using the power button is not necessary if you can connect 
remotely.


See bug #246587 against kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686 for more details.

Josh



Bug#11147: buldge? 6/6/00

2004-04-30 Thread Eliza Tran
ESMTP id DADAF63099 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:15:42 -0400 
(EDT) 
Received: from mail.yahoo.com ([170.196.247.4]) by localhost (targa.yahoo.com 
[82.222.22.208]) 
(amavisd-new, port 10003) with ESMTP id 26931-08 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 
23 Apr 
2004 22:15:42 -0400 (EDT) 
Received: from spm (Ottawa-ppp-199508.yahoo.com [244.108.50.206])by 
mail.yahoo.com 
(Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CCD44203for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 
22:04:45 -0400 (EDT) 
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF28jHYfowwei7Kx0KRaH09kJr0 
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at yahoo.com 
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2004 08:68:42.0870 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[D9F1CAA0:00C428DA]


Hello,

You application has been approved for extended auto war ranty coverage. Your 24 
hour service will 

with no limits begins very soon. Please finish the 15 second post app lication. 
You will never 

have to worry about vehicle problems again with us by your side. Thank you.

Travis T. Jenkins
Auto Warr anty Associate

http://superiorautowarranty.com/auto/?partid=dmps



































If you feel that you are rece iving this ema il in 
err or or would like to modify your fut ure pre ferences, 
please visit: 

http://superiorautowarranty.com/st.html 

converge
delusive axial disgruntle speedup djakarta vivacity barb incinerate atrocity 
corrigendum allege fob brown allyl circulatory withdrew coleman exposition 
walcott b's euripides flown ethology macabre marlin cardiac alphameric music 
filmstrip facto am 




Re: X and 2.6.5 kernel: update of 2.6.5 kernel locks my laptop

2004-04-30 Thread slaven peles
On April 30, 2004 06:00 am, Branden Robinson wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:14:58AM +, slaven peles wrote:
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated
  set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It
  shouldn't access hardware directly.
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated
  set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
  Apr 29 08:25:01 ivor kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It
  shouldn't access hardware directly.

 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:54:24AM -0500, Diego Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
  I have same problem look my log in
  http://uvirtual.ean.edu.co/~derodriguez/kernelprob/XFree86.0.log

 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:52:18PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
  This happens to me, too - Radeon 7000, same kernel.  I filed bug #246587
  against kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686.

 Hi guys,

 This should be fixed in the version of XFree86 that entered sid on 29
 April.

 xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 [...]
   * Fix AT keyboard rate I/O controls by operating on the actual console
 file descriptor, not on file descriptor zero (thanks, Keith Packard).
 Suppresses warning messages from Linux 2.6.  (Closes: #224909) [...]
  -- Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:55:17
 +0200

I checked this again and it's definitely a firmware issue. Thanks to Michael 
Daenzer there is an easy fix for this. Download and install 
drm-trunk-module-src package from 
http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ as well as appropriate 
kernel-headers-2.6.5 package. Then follow standard procedure (as a root):
cd /usr/src
tar xvfz drm-trunk.tar.gz
export KVERS=2.6.5-XXX
export KSRC=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.5-XXX
cd modules/drm-trunk
debian/rules kdist_image
This creates drm-trunk-module...deb package in /usr/src directory, which can 
be easily installed with dpkg -i (no --force-overwrite necessary). At least, 
this worked for me ;-).

Cheers,
Slaven 



Re: Bug#246627: Radeon card firmware problem

2004-04-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 09:09, Daniel Stone wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:53:41AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
  It should be able to fix the problem but i cannot test it myself since I
  lack that kind of hardware.
 
 I can test any of these patches, but I doubt stuff like 3D will work if
 this microcode is actually needed! 

It is, so the patch is completely bogus.

 This would be really, really, really bad if we can do neither 3D nor 
 acceleration. If this is the case, and the GR goes ahead, IMO radeon_cp 
 must be stuffed back in.

It still wouldn't be used at all in the xfree86 build...

The r128 and radeon 2D drivers don't deal gracefully with the DRM
failing to load the firmware. That's a bug which has been fixed at least
in the radeon driver in DRI CVS. I suggest those who insisted on
inconveniencing users by crippling the kernel-image packages dig up the
fix and provide it to the XSF. Alternatively, they could provide the
microcode in a convenient way.

Of course, people can also use non-Debian kernels or
drm-trunk-module-src, which still have the microcode built in.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



Bug#246642: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad

2004-04-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 09:10, Daniel Stone wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:15:54AM -0400, Aron Trauring wrote:
  When X starts up, it goes into an infinite loop, spewing out the 
  following error message in the log file endlessly, until / is filled up:
  
  (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020
  (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP start -1020
  (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020
  (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine...
 
 Oh my. I'm willing to bet this is another CP microcode issue; some cards
 are known to ship with bad firmware (IIRC), or exist in such a state
 that they're useless with microcode.

The cards don't ship any microcode, and the DRM doesn't work without it.

 This is all a mixture of IIRC and AIUI, and I'll try to test .dfsg when
 I get home (dialup sucks), but yeah. It looks like we've crippled
 radeon_drv. :(

No, Herbert has crippled the kernel packages. Of course, the DDX drivers
could deal better with this, at least the radeon driver does in DRI CVS.
I could dig up a patch, but I'd prefer if those who insisted on
crippling things did...


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer




Bug#246642: Workaround

2004-04-30 Thread Ed Warnicke

I don't think this is necessarily a bug in the new xserver-xfree86.
I had this same problem, and tried downgrading xfree86. 
After successfully downgrading I still got the same problem.


A little poking around showed that kernel-image-2.6.5-1-k7_2.6.5-3_i386.deb
came in on the same day as the xfree upgrade.  Dropping back
to an older kernel fixed the problem (even after upgrading
to the latest xfree86, the problem stayed fixed on the older
kernel).

I suspect this is actually a bug in kernel 2.6.5-3.

Ed





Re: Bug#240581: Did you forget about this patch?

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:

 Hi!

 I thought this patch would be applied on the new upload, but it seems it
 wasn't, I have reworked it again so that it applies well against the new
 packages and I'm sending it again to see if we have better luck next time
 ;-)

Hi,
no it is scheduled for the next upload [1].

Thanks for rediffing it again.

Fabio

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-200404/msg01214.html

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Re: If X refuses to start with Radeon chip...

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

Hi Herbert,

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Herbert Xu wrote:

 Then please upgrade your kernel to 2.6.5-4 or above.

 The 2.6.5-3 release contained code which attempted to load firmware
 for Radeon/R128 from userspace that fails miserably when the firmware
 files aren't available.

 This has been reverted for now.

 I apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Thanks a lot for your incredibly fast response to this issue.

Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Re: Start preparing xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 07:56:06AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
  Hi all,
  a few hours ago 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 has been uploaded and it will hit
  the mirrors within tomorrow.

 Hats off, Fabio!  You have my deepest thanks for handling this
 responsibility, and handling it well.

Well thanks also to all your work in cleaning up my logs and errors here
and there ;)

  From the TODO list, I think we should proceed in the following order of
  priorities:
 
  - --- subliminal message: fix whatever I broke with 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 ---

The ATI/radeon problem has been fixed by Herbert already in the new kernel
upload -4. We need to investigate the mga driver to verify who needs to
work on it.

 There are some reports trickling in that the damn kernel 2.6 This is a
 bug in XFree86.  This is a bug in XFree86.  This is a bug in XFree86.
 This is a bug in XFree86. problem isn't truly resolved.

 We'll have to wait and see how that develops.  Not your fault in any
 case.

The one i saw was still to 4.3.0-7, but i went trough it very very fast.

  * steal {U,}XTerm* app-defaults updates from HEAD and resync patches

 I think I will pull from Thomas (Dickey's) releases instead.  With
 XFree86 (implicitly) slapping their new license on all the Imakefiles, I
 don't feel like messing with upstream CVS.

[SNIP]

agreed. more we stay away from the licence mess better is.

  * Fix upstream install rule that prevents Xcursor themes from being
installed on s390.  As I understand it, this is client-side stuff and
there's not really any reason it shouldn't be made available on the s390
architecture.
 
  * Fix other gratuitous differences between s390 debehlper files and the
generic ones by fixing upstream Imakeage to not turn extra stuff off when
the XFree86 X server is not being built (like xmodmap.std).  It ships
libXxf86vm.a but not the corresponding manpages.

 Be warned; I know my way around Imake fairly well by now (though I'm hardly an
 expert), but the above could be time consuming.  I think we should be
 prepared to defer these in favor either of other fixes or just getting
 the release out the door.

Sure. Mine is just a list. We will do as much as we can. Also removing or
postponing items if required.

More generally, I would like that people read my messages as a direction
to go, but not a strict rule to follow.

  For this release, other than the 4 bug fixes, we will work mainly on
  resync and cleanup. If -1 and -2 will not show big problems we might want
  to consider slightly bigger changes for -3, like the rewrite
  xserver-xfree86 debconfage. Time will tell.

 Yeah, I'm not quite ready for a commit of the stuff I've got in my
 working copy.

Do you have a branch for it? or only a local copy?

 See above.  As I feared, David Dawes has not replied to my request for a
 clarification on what the heck is going on with this implicit relicense
 even if neither the file nor the commit message say so business, so I
 think that everything failing the criteria I outlined above needs to be
 regarded as poisonous.

agreed.. as above ;)

Thanks
Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Re: Start preparing xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2

2004-04-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 17:16, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: 
 
 The ATI/radeon problem has been fixed by Herbert already in the new kernel
 upload -4.

Let me point out again that there is actually a bug in the
xserver-xfree86 r128 and radeon drivers: they don't deal gracefully with
the DRI initialisation failing late in the game. However, IMHO it's the
responsibility of the people who want to remove the firmware from the
kernel packages to fix this, as this bug is very unlikely to trigger
otherwise (basically takes a buggy DRM).


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



Re: Start preparing xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Michel D�nzer wrote:

 On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 17:16, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
 
  The ATI/radeon problem has been fixed by Herbert already in the new kernel
  upload -4.

 Let me point out again that there is actually a bug in the
 xserver-xfree86 r128 and radeon drivers: they don't deal gracefully with
 the DRI initialisation failing late in the game. However, IMHO it's the
 responsibility of the people who want to remove the firmware from the
 kernel packages to fix this, as this bug is very unlikely to trigger
 otherwise (basically takes a buggy DRM).

Yes I understand that. Would that bug shows up again in other situations
other than this one? I read in another message that you can dig out a
patch for this problem. Would you mind to post it here?

Thanks
Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Re: Bug#246642: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad

2004-04-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

Hi,
as pointed already by Michel and Herbert, you need to upgrade
your kernel to -4.

I am closing this bug since it is fixed already.

Fabio

-- 
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
user fajita: step two
fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Bug#246642: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad

2004-04-30 Thread Aron Trauring
I also tried downgrading to a 2.6.4 version of the kernel, and it is now 
working fine, so it is definitely a 2.6.5-3 kernel bug, since I upgraded 
to that simultaneously. In fact, now that I think of it, I restarted X 
once after upgrade and it work. The problem only started when I 
rebooted, so got new kernel. Should I report bug to the kernel package, 
or will it get passed along internally?


--
Aron Trauring
Zoteca http://www.zoteca.com/




Bug#246642: marked as done (new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad)

2004-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:53:26 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#246642: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on 
IBM Thinkpad
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 06:15:59 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 23:15:59 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from maximam.com [198.49.126.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJRJW-jr-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:15:59 -0700
Received: (qmail 29177 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 06:15:54 -
Received: from unknown (HELO zoteca.com) (66.108.215.85)
  by maximam.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 06:15:54 -
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:15:54 -0400
From: Aron Trauring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new Xfree86 in unstable crashes with ATI Radeon on IBM Thinkpad
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary=040004020804070503040204
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040004020804070503040204
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package:  xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: critical

Description of problem:

When X starts up, it goes into an infinite loop, spewing out the 
following error message in the log file endlessly, until / is filled up:

(EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020
(EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP start -1020
(EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020
(EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine...

The full log file is attached (I delete the endless reptitions so file will be 
of reasonable size).

Also attached please find the XFree86 configuration file. 

Since my system is configured to start gdm upon boot-up, and since this causes 
an infinite loop of error messages,
essentially the system is inoperable. I need to ssh in and kill the X server, 
but then I no longer have access to the
console window on the notebook.


Software/Hardware configuration:

The system is running kernel 2.6.5-3-686 and is running on an IBM Thinkpad r32 
and uses Debian unstable. 
I have been running X fine until I upgraded to the newest version of the X 
files that include the dfsg extension.
I attach a file of Debian packages installed on the system which are probably 
relevant in some way.

Thanks for your attention to this bug.







--040004020804070503040204
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name=XFree86.0.log
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename=XFree86.0.log


This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way.  Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository
(http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs).

XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 20040428170728 [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Release Date: 15 August 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.23 i686 [ELF] 
Build Date: 28 April 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
OS Kernel: Linux version 2.6.5-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.3 
(Debian 20040401)) #1 Tue Apr 27 23:39:55 EST 2004 
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Fri Apr 30 01:20:28 2004
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
(==) ServerLayout Default Layout
(**) |--Screen Default Screen (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor IBM LCD
(**) |   |--Device ATI Radeon Mobility
(**) |--Input Device Generic Keyboard
(**) Option XkbRules xfree86
(**) XKB: rules: xfree86
(**) Option XkbModel pc104
(**) XKB: model: pc104
(**) Option 

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1341 - people/branden

2004-04-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-30 13:37:08 -0500 (Fri, 30 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1341

Removed:
   people/branden/lintian-overrides/
Log:
Remove unused personal branch.




Re: Start preparing xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2

2004-04-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 18:48, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Michel Dnzer wrote:
 
  On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 17:16, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
  
   The ATI/radeon problem has been fixed by Herbert already in the new kernel
   upload -4.
 
  Let me point out again that there is actually a bug in the
  xserver-xfree86 r128 and radeon drivers: they don't deal gracefully with
  the DRI initialisation failing late in the game. However, IMHO it's the
  responsibility of the people who want to remove the firmware from the
  kernel packages to fix this, as this bug is very unlikely to trigger
  otherwise (basically takes a buggy DRM).
 
 Yes I understand that. Would that bug shows up again in other situations
 other than this one? I read in another message that you can dig out a
 patch for this problem. Would you mind to post it here?

http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/applied/radeon-accelinit.diff is the
radeon fix.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1343 - branches

2004-04-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-30 13:44:06 -0500 (Fri, 30 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1343

Added:
   branches/lintian-cleanup/
Log:
Create branch for collaborative work on cleaning up the xfree86 packages'
lintian warnings and errors (both overrides and fixes are acceptable).


Copied: branches/lintian-cleanup (from rev 1342, trunk)



Debian, programs for you.

2004-04-30 Thread Outpourings C. Coquetted



Top of the morning to you! :)Love is a chain of love as nature is a chain of life.
Searching for not expensive high-quality software?
Our site might be just what you need.http://seminecessary.dbsoft.biz
We offer Software to download or it can be shipped to you on CD.
And more!We can ship worldwide.What a fool does in the end, the wise do in the beginning.Life without industry is guilt. Industry without Art is Brutality.



X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1344 - trunk/debian

2004-04-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-04-30 14:05:47 -0500 (Fri, 30 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1344

Modified:
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Make possible to upgrade from SVN to the next release and
fix a FTBFS in binary: target. dpkg-deb wants at least
one digit in Debian revision.


Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog  2004-04-30 18:44:06 UTC (rev 1343)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog  2004-04-30 19:05:47 UTC (rev 1344)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-SVN) unstable; urgency=low
+xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1+SVN) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix 30xfree86-common_xresources Xsession script to check for existence of
 xrdb command before attempting to execute it, and warn if it is not found



Create a new income with eBay

2004-04-30 Thread Tabitha Roe
Title: Turnkey



surreal yeats cinematic pornographer assuage citrate conscious rubric nazism zippy carlyle adulthood coherent bony odyssey deborah mallard lesotho showroom daydream anastigmatic baltic brace cowgirl captivate classmate conferred peridotite reconcile proclaim dreyfuss was brainchild lose knifelike detail bindery eulerian 




















cable hilum dioxide checkpoint castigate episodic rug miles thirsty cruise infield permissive octennial dorchester quadrivium gangling euclidean crayfish concoct custodian aviv celsius chance furbish portray burr sequin monongahela clinging difficulty ssw secession promiscuous cruddy grass topple inhospitable elate dubitable cutworm dilogarithm infrastructure portugal cajole ballard metamorphism bereave revertive boyish clothesline filmdom andromeda shank kettering teller saturday counterargument laurentian tatty disseminate warehouse brocade screech numismatist insect separate allocate incentive cease nutritious plagiarism kind adopt tort leery cadaverous roister forgo clammy ecumenic household carbine couple irresponsible aforementioned fingertip homebuilder test leigh pummel siberia bulky pooch marshmallow mannerism brazier comprehension pay abdomen interject deal mesenteric payne freshmen rodney who cougar eagle plenum gall animate somal awake conakry dortmund avis peppy trample discriminatory nuisance abutted indiscriminate rap reputation illogic cage atlantica disparate newborn shill coverlet detroit headstand item beseech hypothesis sherwin connivance haplology chaparral chatty committed methodology leighton situs sacrosanct deplete rampant nashua schist convict 




Learn to Make A For'tune With E'bay!
Com'plete Tur'nkey Sy'stem
So'ftware - Vi'deos - Tut'orials
Visit Here For Information


removemeplease





Bug#22506: Message subject

2004-04-30 Thread Kris
Pendleton,*

Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month?

-800 MB Disk Space
-Unlimited email accounts
-FREE Shopping Cart... and much more! 

Please contact us to take advantage of this new offer at  

http://viewhostdeals.com


dubhe 


X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1345 - branches/lintian-cleanup/debian

2004-04-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-30 14:58:39 -0500 (Fri, 30 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1345

Added:
   branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xfree86.lintian
   branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-common.lintian
   branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-xfree86.lintian
   branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xterm.lintian
   branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xutils.lintian
Log:
Add some lintian overrides files.

Note that a change to debian/rules to install these in the proper location
will be necessary.

Note also that these were created some time ago, and some of the overrides
may be obsolete.  The contents of these files should be reviewed.


Added: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xfree86.lintian
===
--- branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xfree86.lintian 2004-04-30 19:05:47 UTC 
(rev 1344)
+++ branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xfree86.lintian 2004-04-30 19:58:39 UTC 
(rev 1345)
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# $Id$
+
+# Lintian bug: #194257
+xfree86 source: newer-standards-version 3.6.1


Property changes on: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xfree86.lintian
___
Name: svn:keywords
   + Id

Added: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-common.lintian
===
--- branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-common.lintian  2004-04-30 
19:05:47 UTC (rev 1344)
+++ branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-common.lintian  2004-04-30 
19:58:39 UTC (rev 1345)
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# $Id$
+
+# The X server needs to be setuid/setgid root because it performs
+# privileged hardware access.
+xserver-common: setuid-gid-binary usr/X11R6/bin/X 6755 root/root
+
+# The dexconf script does not use debconf as a registry.
+xserver-common: debconf-is-not-a-registry ./usr/bin/dexconf


Property changes on: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-common.lintian
___
Name: svn:keywords
   + Id

Added: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-xfree86.lintian
===
--- branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-xfree86.lintian 2004-04-30 
19:05:47 UTC (rev 1344)
+++ branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-xfree86.lintian 2004-04-30 
19:58:39 UTC (rev 1345)
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# $Id$
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a package name.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question shared/default-x-server
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a device driver name.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/device/driver
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a device file specification.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/mouse/port
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a mouse protocol name.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/mouse/protocol
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is populated at run time.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/monitor/selection-method
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a list of video modes.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/monitor/mode-list
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a list of video modes.
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/display/modes
+
+# The Choices field for this question does not need to be translated, since
+# it is a list of integers (color depths).
+xserver-xfree86: partially-translated-question 
xserver-xfree86/config/display/default_depth


Property changes on: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xserver-xfree86.lintian
___
Name: svn:keywords
   + Id

Added: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xterm.lintian
===
--- branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xterm.lintian   2004-04-30 19:05:47 UTC 
(rev 1344)
+++ branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xterm.lintian   2004-04-30 19:58:39 UTC 
(rev 1345)
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# $Id$
+
+# xterm needs to be setgid utmp per Debian Policy section 11.3
+xterm: setgid-binary usr/X11R6/bin/xterm 2755 root/utmp


Property changes on: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xterm.lintian
___
Name: svn:keywords
   + Id

Added: branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xutils.lintian
===
--- branches/lintian-cleanup/debian/xutils.lintian  2004-04-30 19:05:47 UTC 
(rev 

Re: Adding a keyboard to Xfree

2004-04-30 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:52:57AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Warning: This might be a packaging issue only.
 
 I developed my own keyboard mapping for XKB (based on my keyboard,
 however I did add a lot of fancy chars that I needed so type spanish,
 italian and other european languages on a regular basis via AltGr+key,
 I could fit in most of latin-9 charset).
 
 To have it work fully, I had to manually edit /etc/X11/xkb/symbols.dir.
 However, this means each upgrade is slightly annoying (asking me wether
 I want to replace .../symbols.dir with the provided version).
 
 I would also like to package my keyboard, to deploy it on a large
 number of computers. The modification of symbols.dir would therefore
 be unpractical and against the Debian packaging rules (no conffile
 should be modified by two packages).
 
 How could I solve this? Any idea?

If this keyboard layout is only used by you, you could run setxkbmap
from $HOME/.xsession, see for instance (in French)
   http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-french-0402/msg01539.html

Denis



Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'

2004-04-30 Thread Paul Walker
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

When I try to upgrade from xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2, I get the following
complaint from dpkg:

Preparing to replace xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 (using 
.../xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb) ...
ln: /etc/X11/X.dpkg-old': File exists
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
debconf: Unknown template field 'escription-pt_br', in stanza #28 of
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.templates

Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

(I'm pretty sure that the 'X.dpkg-old' part isn't the problem, but I've
included it for completeness.)

I've looked through the file it references, and I can't find a field by that
description. The bug might be with dpkg, I guess, but this is the first and
only time I've ever seen it (dpkg upgraded lots of other packages fine at
the same time).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.24   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xserver-common  4.3.0-7  files and utilities common to all 
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.1-3compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded



Bug#243081: xserver-xfree86: dpms blanking behaves erracticaly

2004-04-30 Thread Tyler Riddle
Yes they do, in fact both monitors work flawlessly
(with identical hardware) under Windows 2000. There
seems to be something up with XFree86 4, as when the
last time I used unix on these monitors was duing the
3.x days and there were also no problems there.

Thanks for your assistance,
Tyler Riddle
--- Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 04:44:08PM -0700, Tyler
 Riddle wrote:
  I switched monitors and the behavior changed a
 little.
  Instead of oscilating between off and on states it
 now
  displays about 5 seconds of strange lines, I
 believe
  the sync rates to be pretty wild. Then the new
 monitor
  will turn off. I also tried switching cards after
  changing monitors, both cards had the same
 behavior.
  
  The current card is a brand new nVidia Geforce 3d
 card
  using the nVidia drivers. Finaly, the same
 behavior
  was observed under freebsd previously on this
  computer, with the Rage video card and the
 original
  monitor.
 
 Thanks for following up.
 
 Do these monitors claim to support DPMS?  As I
 understand it, DPMS
 signaling is done very crudely, by turning off the
 horizontal and
 vertical sync signals in various combinations to
 indicate standby,
 sleep, and off.
 
 -- 
 G. Branden Robinson| You could
 wire up a dead rat to a
 Debian GNU/Linux   | DIMM socket
 and the PC BIOS memory
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | test would
 pass it just fine.
 http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan
 Benson
 

 ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
name=signature.asc



=
There are only 10 types of people in this world: Those who understand binary 
and those who don't.

aim: TheMastaSpice




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs  
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover 




Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'

2004-04-30 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:54:08PM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
 Package: xserver-xfree86
 Version: 4.1.0-2
 Severity: normal
 Tags: sid
 
 When I try to upgrade from xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2, I get the following
 complaint from dpkg:
 
 Preparing to replace xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 (using 
 .../xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb) ...
 ln: /etc/X11/X.dpkg-old': File exists
 dpkg: error processing 
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
 debconf: Unknown template field 'escription-pt_br', in stanza #28 of
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.templates

Can you please send your /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.templates?

Denis



Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'

2004-04-30 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:57:41PM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
 On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:42:01AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
 
  Can you please send your /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.templates?
 
 Attached; sorry, I forgot to send it earlier. I think I've found the problem
 (grepped with -i this time) - right at the end, there's an entry:
 
 Escription-pt_BR: Selecione os modos de vídeo que o X deve usar.
 
 If you correct that to Description then I don't get that problem any more.
 (Just a different one instead. But at least it's a change.)
 
 Sorry, I should have thought of that particular grep combination before. :/
 No idea whether the corruption came from 4.1.0 or 4.3.0, I'm afraid.

Very strange, this file is not the one found on Debian servers.
Where does it come from?

Denis



Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'

2004-04-30 Thread Paul Walker
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 01:28:05AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:

  No idea whether the corruption came from 4.1.0 or 4.3.0, I'm afraid.
 Very strange, this file is not the one found on Debian servers.
 Where does it come from?

Er .. if it's not from either of those packages, then I've no idea! This is
the first time I've touched any of the files in the dpkg directories. If
it's definitely not present in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1, then the bug might as well be
closed, I guess.

-- 
Paul



Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'

2004-04-30 Thread Paul Walker
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:42:01AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:

 Can you please send your /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.templates?

Attached; sorry, I forgot to send it earlier. I think I've found the problem
(grepped with -i this time) - right at the end, there's an entry:

Escription-pt_BR: Selecione os modos de v?deo que o X deve usar.

If you correct that to Description then I don't get that problem any more.
(Just a different one instead. But at least it's a change.)

Sorry, I should have thought of that particular grep combination before. :/
No idea whether the corruption came from 4.1.0 or 4.3.0, I'm afraid.

-- 
Paul

Over the centuries, mankind has tried many ways of combating the forces of
evil...prayer, fasting, good works and so on. Up until Doom, no one seemed
to have thought about the double-barrel shotgun. Eat leaden death, demon...
 -- Terry Pratchett


xserver-xfree86.templates.bz2
Description: Binary data