Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)
On 2021/02/02 23:11:10, Eya Badal wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version 0.3.0 > > The vote is open now and until February 5th at 3:11 PM PST and passes if a > majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.3.0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/ > > Please note that this is the first Apache release for Apache AGE. > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.3.0.rc0-incubating (commit > 549ac9ff63337f64a9c19d8b9950b89ae412edee): > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/tree/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating > > The release files, including signatures, etc. can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts: > FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201 E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2 > > The notes corresponding to this release can be found at: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating > > > Thank you very much, > Eya Badal > > Dear AGE Community, I'm closing this vote and happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 3 +1 votes (3 bindings) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 (Binding) -- * Felix Cheung * vongosling * Kevin Ratnasekera There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you to all who helped make this happen. Vote thread can be found here [1]. I'll continue with the next round of the voting process and update the community as progress is made. [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra304943d27e372ac5c00e9cc19276b28f5ff25396fb343284a756808%40%3Cdev.age.apache.org%3E Best regards, Eya Badal
[VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version 0.3.0 The vote is open now and until February 5th at 3:11 PM PST and passes if a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.3.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/ Please note that this is the first Apache release for Apache AGE. The tag to be voted on is v0.3.0.rc0-incubating (commit 549ac9ff63337f64a9c19d8b9950b89ae412edee): https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/tree/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating The release files, including signatures, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts: FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201 E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2 The notes corresponding to this release can be found at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating Thank you very much, Eya Badal
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE First Release
Since there have been no comments and concerns, I will call for a vote on this release "Apache AGE 0.3.0" soon. Thank you very much. On 2021/01/23 00:01:33, John Gemignani wrote: > Dear all, > > We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 0.3.0. that we have been > working toward it. This release is the first release of Apache AGE. > > Functionalities included and addressed in this release: > · Standard functions > · User defined functions > · Aggregate functions (partial) > · Property constraints > · SET clause (Simple scenario where one property is updated) > · REMOVE clause > · Define extension’s behavior when dropped > > > 1- The git tag to be voted upon: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating > > 2- The git commit hash: > commit 549ac9ff63337f64a9c19d8b9950b89ae412edee > > > 3- THE SOURCE TARBALL CAN BE FOUND > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.3.0.rc0/ > > 4- The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts: > FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201 E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2 > > 5- Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS > > 6- The release notes: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating > > Please share your thoughts and feedback and let us know if we can call for a > vote. > > John >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE First Release
@Kevin Ratnasekera , @vongosling , and Felix Cheung could you please advise and guide us through this process. This is our first release and we need your guidance and support during this process. We followed your previous feedbacks and provided all the necessary information. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon. On 2021/01/23 00:01:33, John Gemignani wrote: > Dear all, > > We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 0.3.0. that we have been > working toward it. This release is the first release of Apache AGE. > > Functionalities included and addressed in this release: > · Standard functions > · User defined functions > · Aggregate functions (partial) > · Property constraints > · SET clause (Simple scenario where one property is updated) > · REMOVE clause > · Define extension’s behavior when dropped > > > 1- The git tag to be voted upon: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating > > 2- The git commit hash: > commit 549ac9ff63337f64a9c19d8b9950b89ae412edee > > > 3- THE SOURCE TARBALL CAN BE FOUND > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.3.0.rc0/ > > 4- The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts: > FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201 E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2 > > 5- Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS > > 6- The release notes: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating > > Please share your thoughts and feedback and let us know if we can call for a > vote. > > John >
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Please disregard the previous message. I just replaced it with "the Apache Incubator PMC." On 2021/01/21 23:29:50, Eya Badal wrote: > Hello @ Felix Cheung and all, > > Regarding the WIP-Disclaimer, could you please advise what to include when it > mentioned "the name of Apache TLP sponsor". I am not sure about this part. > > Thank you very much. > > "Apache AGE is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software > Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache TLP sponsor. " > > > On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung wrote: > > Thanks for the updates. > > > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off > > (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just > > easier to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to > > go this route or not. > > > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best > > not to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best > > not to include files, source code etc from another project because then > > proper attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) > > > > See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Hi Felix, > > > > I just want to mention some points. > > > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is > > fixed now. > > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > > distribution. > > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is > > included. > > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to > > go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so > > I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. > > Please advise. > > > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > > > Best regards, > > > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list > > > >and ask everyone to vote? > > > > > > > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t > > > > be just the mentor. > > > > > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > > > >I will remove this file. > > > > > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > > > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure > > > >it is consistent. > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > > > > > 4. > > > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is > > > > there a possible licensing issue? > > > > > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache > > > >License as well which is included in the licensing file. > > > > 5, > > > > KEYS.txt > > > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in > > > > git repo > > > > I will remove this as well. > > > > > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > > > >thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > > > following link: > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Eya > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Hello @ Felix Cheung and all, Regarding the WIP-Disclaimer, could you please advise what to include when it mentioned "the name of Apache TLP sponsor". I am not sure about this part. Thank you very much. "Apache AGE is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache TLP sponsor. " On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung wrote: > Thanks for the updates. > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off > (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just easier > to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to go this > route or not. > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best not > to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best not > to include files, source code etc from another project because then proper > attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) > > See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > > From: Eya Badal > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > To: dev@age.apache.org > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Hi Felix, > > I just want to mention some points. > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is > fixed now. > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > distribution. > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is > included. > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go > by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I > am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please > advise. > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > Best regards, > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > > >ask everyone to vote? > > > > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > > just the mentor. > > > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > > >I will remove this file. > > > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure > > >it is consistent. > > > > > > 3. > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > > > 4. > > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there > > > a possible licensing issue? > > > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache > > >License as well which is included in the licensing file. > > > 5, > > > KEYS.txt > > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > > repo > > > I will remove this as well. > > > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > > >thoughts. > > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > > following link: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Eya > > > > > >
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Dear @ vongosling understood. Thank you very much for your guidance and feedback. It is our first release and we are learning the process of calling for a VOTE so thanks for the great tips. We will follow the formal format for a discussion and vote from now on. Regarding the "the voice of discussion" we would like to hear more since we might be confused just a bit. Could you please give us more guidance on the discussion and community activities for our mailing list? We will start the formal discussion soon before calling for a vote. Thank you. On 2021/01/20 01:10:33, vongosling wrote: > Hi, > > @Eya Badal Abdisho we must start a formal > discussion before the call for a vote. In addition, I'm more concerned > about the activities of our community than that. Our mailing list doesn't > seem to see the voice of discussion. If there's any confusion, please raise > it ：-0 > > There is some default output when we call for a discussion or vote for some > release, which includes not only the source(or bin) tarball location as > here. but also including git tag, keys location, and other necessary > references, such as release notes. The following is an example like this: > > The git tag to be voted upon: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/tree/0.6.0-rc0 > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/tree/0.6.0-rc0> > > > The git commit hash: > > 2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2 > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/commit/2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2 > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/commit/2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2> > > > THE SOURCE TARBALL CAN BE FOUND AT: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.6.0/rc0/ > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.6.0/rc0/> > > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts: > 1CEF 33FA 6180 0117 BDB2 E0E0 D51E A8F0 0EE7 9B28 > > Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS> > > Eya Badal 于2021年1月20日周三 上午12:18写道： > > > Thank you very much for your feedback and suggestions. I will change the > > disclaimer to WIP also we will not include the file regarding the > > OpneCypher. > > > > I will call for a VOTE after the changes soon. > > > > Best regards, > > Eya > > > > On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > Thanks for the updates. > > > > > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is > > off (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just > > easier to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to > > go this route or not. > > > > > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best > > not to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best > > not to include files, source code etc from another project because then > > proper attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) > > > > > > See bundled dependencies here > > https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Hi Felix, > > > > > > I just want to mention some points. > > > > > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names > > is fixed now. > > > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > > distribution. > > > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it > > is included. > > > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > > > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have > > to go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > > > > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks > > so I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. > > Please advise. > > > > > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > > Yes. See the link I
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Thank you very much for your feedback and suggestions. I will change the disclaimer to WIP also we will not include the file regarding the OpneCypher. I will call for a VOTE after the changes soon. Best regards, Eya On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung wrote: > Thanks for the updates. > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off > (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just easier > to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to go this > route or not. > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best not > to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best not > to include files, source code etc from another project because then proper > attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) > > See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > > From: Eya Badal > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > To: dev@age.apache.org > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Hi Felix, > > I just want to mention some points. > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is > fixed now. > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > distribution. > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is > included. > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go > by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I > am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please > advise. > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > Best regards, > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > > >ask everyone to vote? > > > > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > > just the mentor. > > > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > > >I will remove this file. > > > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure > > >it is consistent. > > > > > > 3. > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > > > 4. > > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there > > > a possible licensing issue? > > > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache > > >License as well which is included in the licensing file. > > > 5, > > > KEYS.txt > > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > > repo > > > I will remove this as well. > > > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > > >thoughts. > > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > > following link: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Eya > > > > > >
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Hi Felix, I just want to mention some points. 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is fixed now. 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source distribution. 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is included. 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please advise. We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. Best regards, On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > ____ > From: Eya Badal > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > >ask everyone to vote? > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > just the mentor. > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > >I will remove this file. > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it > >is consistent. > > > > 3. > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > 4. > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a > > possible licensing issue? > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License > >as well which is included in the licensing file. > > 5, > > KEYS.txt > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > repo > > I will remove this as well. > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > >thoughts. > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > following link: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > Best regards, > > Eya > > >
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Thank you very much, will do. I do have some follow up questions: 1-Is there any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? 2-Regarding the OpenCypher licensing, it is based on Apache License and we believe it shouldn't be an issue to include it. Could you please advise? Thank you in advance for your time. On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > ____ > From: Eya Badal > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > >ask everyone to vote? > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > just the mentor. > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > >I will remove this file. > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it > >is consistent. > > > > 3. > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > 4. > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a > > possible licensing issue? > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License > >as well which is included in the licensing file. > > 5, > > KEYS.txt > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > repo > > I will remove this as well. > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > >thoughts. > > > > > > From: Eya Badal > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > following link: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > Best regards, > > Eya > > >
Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and ask >everyone to vote? On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > just the mentor. > > A good vote thread might be like: > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > 1. md5 - should not include >I will remove this file. > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it is >consistent. > > 3. > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > 4. > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a > possible licensing issue? > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License as >well which is included in the licensing file. > 5, > KEYS.txt > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git repo > I will remove this as well. > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or >thoughts. > > > From: Eya Badal > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Dear Mentors, > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the following > link: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > Could you please review and approve. > > Best regards, > Eya >
Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
Dear Mentors, We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the following link: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ Could you please review and approve. Best regards, Eya
Re: First Apache Release
On 2020/12/22 02:14:38, vongosling wrote: > Great news for the first podling release, I would like to hear any feedback > from the community? > >Hey Vongosling, >Please let me know if you have any suggestions/feedbacks? > > > Kevin Ratnasekera 于2020年12月20日周日 下午6:54写道： > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I wanted to bring discussion on $subject, I think we should now start > > working on it and plan out our first release work ahead. I think we should > > only concentrate on doing a source only release as our first release, as it > > will remove some of the burdens in the release process. > > > > Here [1] [2] some materials which I think will be helpful when you are > > working on the release process. > > > > Please reach out to mentors if you need further help or concerns regarding > > the Apache release process. > > > > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > > > Regards > > Kevin > > > > > -- > Nothing is impossible >
Re: First Apache Release
On 2020/12/20 10:53:47, Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I wanted to bring discussion on $subject, I think we should now start > working on it and plan out our first release work ahead. I think we should > only concentrate on doing a source only release as our first release, as it > will remove some of the burdens in the release process. > > Here [1] [2] some materials which I think will be helpful when you are > working on the release process. > > Please reach out to mentors if you need further help or concerns regarding > the Apache release process. > > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > Regards > Kevin > >Thank you for the information and links, Kevin. I am researching those links >right now and looking forward to working with other committers and mentors to >make a plan for those releases, especially our first release. Best regards,
Re: Hi - can you please respond?
On 2020/12/07 22:31:25, Duane Nickull wrote: > I would like to know how to join the mailing list > > Duane > >Hi Duan, Please just subscribe to this mailing list and then you will be able to receive all the posts/news. It is the same for all other mailing lists, as long as you subscribe you should be able to receive also post. > > > -- > Copyright 2019 - 2020WebStation Global Business Solutions, Inc. > w. https://webstationhq.com > t. https://twitter.com/WebStationHQ > l. https://www.linkedin.com/company/19211631 > > NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential > information. If you are the intended recipient, please consider this a > privileged communication, not to be forwarded without explicit approval > from the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any > copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than > the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. The originator > reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its > networks for quality control purposes. >
Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020
On 2020/12/01 02:26:44, Felix Cheung wrote: > Reminder: > > >Thank you for the reminder, I will take care of the report this month. > > From: jmcl...@apache.org > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 4:01:34 PM > To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020 > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly board report. > > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 December 2020. > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and > submission (Wed, December 02). > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board > meeting. > > Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually > elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or > PPMC members in your report. > > Thanks, > > The Apache Incubator PMC > > Submitting your Report > > -- > > Your report should contain the following: > > * Your project name > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of > the project or necessarily of its field > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move > towards graduation. > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be > aware of > * How has the community developed since the last report > * How has the project developed since the last report. > * How does the podling rate their own maturity. > > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/December2020 > > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before > this page is created from a template. > > Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown. > > Mentors > --- > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > for the Incubator PMC. > > Incubator PMC >
Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - October 2020
On 2020/10/09 07:23:27, vongosling wrote: > Hi, > > I have helped do a round of reviews, corrected some syntax. Hope to be a > more open discussion in the dev mail list, such as our first release, new > committer voting. At least the mail was too quiet :-) > > Thank you, Von, I appreciate it. >Yes, could we please discuss more about our first release? It would be great >if we can start it here :) > > > > > > > > Eya Badal 于2020年10月4日周日 上午4:45写道： > > > > > > > On 2020/09/30 18:41:44, Josh Innis wrote: > > > Hi Eya, > > > > > > I'll do this upcoming report. > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:39 PM Eya Badal wrote: > > > > > > > >Hello all, > > > > >Anyone would like to volunteer for the next upcoming report due on > > (Wed, > > > > October 07) ? > > > > > > > >Thank you, Josh. > > > > > > > > -- > Nothing is impossible >
Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - October 2020
On 2020/09/30 18:41:44, Josh Innis wrote: > Hi Eya, > > I'll do this upcoming report. > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:39 PM Eya Badal wrote: > > > >Hello all, > > >Anyone would like to volunteer for the next upcoming report due on (Wed, > > October 07) ? > > > >Thank you, Josh. >
Podling Age Report Reminder - October 2020
>Hello all, >Anyone would like to volunteer for the next upcoming report due on (Wed, >October 07) ?
Re: User list subscription
On 2020/08/09 06:34:50, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > I am wondering about the subscription method for users list. > > Following the instructions on > https://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html > Please use the following link, it is users and not user. https://lists.apache.org/list.html?us...@age.apache.org > An email to user-subscr...@age.apache.org should get a user started. > > I have few questions regarding apache AGE: > > 1- As far as I understand, there are two flavours, a full DB install > and an extension as a postgresql extension. If my understanding is > correct, what is the difference in performance ? > > AgensGraph-Extension > agensgraph > > 2- We are planning to use AgensGraph with java. The subproject > https://github.com/bitnine-oss/agensgraph-jdbc is good enough. However > I am wondering about support for r2dbc driver. https://r2dbc.io/ > > Thank you >
Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020
On 2020/09/01 19:36:46, Felix Cheung wrote: > Any volunteers to write this report? > Yes, I am doing it. Thank you for checking!!! > > From: jmcl...@apache.org > Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 6:55:20 PM > To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020 > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly board report. > > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 September 2020. > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and > submission (Wed, September 02). > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board > meeting. > > Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually > elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or > PPMC members in your report. > > Thanks, > > The Apache Incubator PMC > > Submitting your Report > > -- > > Your report should contain the following: > > * Your project name > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of > the project or necessarily of its field > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move > towards graduation. > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be > aware of > * How has the community developed since the last report > * How has the project developed since the last report. > * How does the podling rate their own maturity. > > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/September2020 > > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before > this page is created from a template. > > Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown. > > Mentors > --- > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > for the Incubator PMC. > > Incubator PMC >
Re: User list subscription
On 2020/08/09 06:34:50, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > I am wondering about the subscription method for users list. > > Following the instructions on > https://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html > > An email to user-subscr...@age.apache.org should get a user started. > > I have few questions regarding apache AGE: > > 1- As far as I understand, there are two flavours, a full DB install > and an extension as a postgresql extension. If my understanding is > correct, what is the difference in performance ? >There is only one way to use AGE - you need PostgreSQL installed and then you >install the extension. > > AgensGraph-Extension > agensgraph > > 2- We are planning to use AgensGraph with java. The subproject > https://github.com/bitnine-oss/agensgraph-jdbc is good enough. However > I am wondering about support for r2dbc driver. https://r2dbc.io/ > For this question you may contact the AgensGraph team. > > Thank you >
Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - August 2020
On 2020/08/01 04:32:11, Felix Cheung wrote: > Any one could take a shot at the report? > >Yes, I am working on it. > > From: jmcl...@apache.org > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 1:22:06 AM > To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - August 2020 > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly board report. > > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 August 2020. > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and > submission (Wed, August 05). > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board > meeting. > > Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually > elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or > PPMC members in your report. > > Thanks, > > The Apache Incubator PMC > > Submitting your Report > > -- > > Your report should contain the following: > > * Your project name > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of > the project or necessarily of its field > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move > towards graduation. > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be > aware of > * How has the community developed since the last report > * How has the project developed since the last report. > * How does the podling rate their own maturity. > > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/August2020 > > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before > this page is created from a template. > > Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown. > > Mentors > --- > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > for the Incubator PMC. > > Incubator PMC >
