Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

[raja sekhar]

hi prasanth,

In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter qos
properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM.

Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth)
through xencenter or commandline process in
http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html ,
if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from
xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it will
changed to 25Mb/s.

waiting for your reply.

Regards,
Rajasekhar.


On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra <
prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> From the  xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS
> settings) for that particular vm .
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
>
> Recent reply from Vadim:
> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar  wrote:
>
> > Hi Star,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
> > how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command
> > for xenserver host?
> >
> > waiting for your reply.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rajasekhar.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the
> > > network rate of global configuration.
> > > If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of
> > > the VM and focus on   ... .
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Star Guo
> > >
> > > -邮件原件-
> > > 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> > > 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> > > 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the
> > > Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute
> > > offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network
> > > Throttling Rate(default 200
> > > Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> > >
> > > please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rajasekhar.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #770

[jenkins]

See 

Review Request 28891: CLOUDSTACK-8055: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28891/
---

Review request for cloudstack.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8055
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8055


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

The test cases try to download template/iso.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_ss_domain_limits.py 998bb8b 
  test/integration/component/test_ss_limits.py 4d6efc4 
  test/integration/component/test_ss_max_limits.py 49a1e4f 
  test/integration/component/test_ss_project_limits.py 0668f07 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28891/diff/


Testing
---

N/A


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #769

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Abhinandan Prateek]

Following test worked fine on 4.3 adv zone setup with Xen 6.2:

Register template
VM creation
Multiple primary storages
Storage tagging
VM, Volume snapshots
Volume from snapshot
VPC

In dev setup the storage is configured as local storage by default, since I was 
using shared storage and was not aware of this, it took some time to figure it 
out.

Other than that 4.3 worked pretty well. Though if we have any type of 
automation configured on it, it will be nice to run regression tests and know 
publish the result.

My thought will be to get this release (4.3.2) out of the door instead of 
delaying it  past 4.5, 4.5 testing is going to take time as it may require more 
bug fixing-testing iterations than 4.3.2.
As of now 4.3.2 looks promising.

Abhinandan Prateek

M +919701199011
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com

> On 10-Dec-2014, at 3:09 am, Mike Tutkowski  
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I agree 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing.
>
> What's not clear to me is how much coverage we currently have for that
> release and how much of it is automated.
>
> A lot of fixes went into it and that's awesome, but that does increase the
> probability that something here or there was broken.
>
> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Mike Tutkowski 
> wrote:
>
>> I see it listed on the website now. Thanks :)
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rohit Yadav > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> 4.4.2 is already released.
>>>
 On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski <
>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

 I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0
>>> and
 4.3.2) at the same time.

 I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have
>>> enough
 bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time.
>>>
>>> I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an
>>> upcoming cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives,
>>> automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season -
>>> but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s
>>> good to see so many initiatives.
>>>
>>> I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing
>>> community;
>>>
>>> - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing
>>> release(s)
>>> - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs
>>> along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from
>>> source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging)
>>> - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix
>>> release and requires less bandwidth
>>> - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing
>>> and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of
>>> changes and a new systemvmtemplate
>>>
>>> I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC
>>> is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for
>>> users and people in general to participate without building from source
>>> (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way).
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>>> CloudStack Consulting
>>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStac

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5-simulator #111

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-8030: Updated router to come up egress default ALLOW

--
[...truncated 1143 lines...]
Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema 
---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Compiling 662 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Compiling 2 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-schema 
---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DatabaseAccessObjectTest
Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.292 sec
Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DbUpgradeUtilsTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.269 sec

Results :

Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-jobs 
---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Compiling 33 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 4 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

Yes I am planning to record the GTM

> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:59 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Steve Wilson
> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> 
> Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others can view 
> it
> if they are not able to attend (or only become interested after the first 
> couple
> meetings and wants to catch up)?
> 
> Will
> On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
> wrote:
> 
> > I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
> >
> > Here are the details.
> >
> > 1.  Please join my meeting.
> > https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
> >
> > 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> > Or, call in using your telephone.
> >
> > United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
> > Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385
> > Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358
> > Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> > Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> > Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> > Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
> > Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331
> > Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388
> > Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> > Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909
> > Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413
> > Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281
> > Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> > Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
> > China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> > Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057
> > Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> > Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> > Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> > Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> > France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> > France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> > Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> > Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
> > Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282
> > Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812
> > Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259
> > Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993
> > India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227
> > Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818
> > 263
> > Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> > Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
> > Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
> > Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> > Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
> > Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free): 800
> > 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800
> > 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> > Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
> > New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579
> > Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> > Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> > Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789
> > Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
> > Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800
> > 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800
> > 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia
> > (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South
> > Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593
> > Spain: +34 931 76 1534
> > Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
> > Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
> > Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
> > Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
> > Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
> > Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488
> > 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates
> > (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209
> > United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free): 1 877
> > 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120
> > 32 148
> >
> > Access Code: 285-394-368
> > Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
> >
> > Meeting ID: 285-394-368
> >
> > GoToMeeting®
> > Online Meetings Made Easy®
> >
> > Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your
> > iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> > >
> > > Based on Doodle. Meeting  is schedule for  Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC.
> > freenode:
> > > #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks...  and I'll be
> > > > > rooting for
> > > > those
> > > > > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices
> > > > > for the community to adopt!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Agreed
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > -Original Message-
>

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Matthew Midgett]

In would love to be a part of the meeting as a user just to be a fly on the 
wall. My datacenter that I am contracted to build a public cloud is relying on 
me to keep up to date with the project but tomorrow I am scheduled to do a 
wireless relay shot of 18miles and will miss the meeting. Not a big deal if the 
notes are taken or recorded and I will be able to review them.

Just my 2 cents 


-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:59 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Steve Wilson (steve.wil...@citrix.com)
Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process

Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others can view 
it if they are not able to attend (or only become interested after the first 
couple meetings and wants to catch up)?

Will
On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
wrote:

> I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
>
> Here are the details.
>
> 1.  Please join my meeting.
> https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
>
> 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> Or, call in using your telephone.
>
> United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
> Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385
> Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358
> Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
> Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331
> Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388
> Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909
> Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413
> Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281
> Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
> China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057
> Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
> Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282
> Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812
> Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259
> Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993
> India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227
> Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 
> 263
> Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
> Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
> Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
> Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 
> 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 
> 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
> New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579 
> Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789
> Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
> Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800 
> 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800 
> 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia 
> (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South 
> Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593
> Spain: +34 931 76 1534
> Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
> Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
> Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
> Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
> Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
> Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 
> 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates 
> (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209 
> United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free): 1 877 
> 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 
> 32 148
>
> Access Code: 285-394-368
> Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
>
> Meeting ID: 285-394-368
>
> GoToMeeting®
> Online Meetings Made Easy®
>
> Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your 
> iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> >
> > Based on Doodle. Meeting  is schedule for  Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC.
> freenode:
> > #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers 
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks...  and I'll be 
> > > > rooting for
> > > those
> > > > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices 
> > > > for the community to adopt!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Ch

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Will Stevens]

Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others can
view it if they are not able to attend (or only become interested after the
first couple meetings and wants to catch up)?

Will
On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
wrote:

> I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
>
> Here are the details.
>
> 1.  Please join my meeting.
> https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
>
> 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> Or, call in using your telephone.
>
> United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
> Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385
> Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358
> Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
> Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331
> Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388
> Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909
> Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413
> Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281
> Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
> China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057
> Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453
> Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
> Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282
> Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812
> Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259
> Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993
> India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227
> Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563
> Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 263
> Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
> Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
> Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
> Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880
> Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 81016
> Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860
> Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 123 8367
> Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
> New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051
> New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579
> Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789
> Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
> Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565
> Poland (toll-free): 00 800 3211434
> Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139
> Romania (toll-free): 0 800 410 025
> Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914
> Saudi Arabia (toll-free): 800 844 3636
> Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000
> South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451
> Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593
> Spain: +34 931 76 1534
> Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
> Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
> Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
> Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
> Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
> Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442
> Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 29001
> Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691
> United Arab Emirates (toll-free): 800 044 40444
> United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209
> United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817
> United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2070
> Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459
> Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 32 148
>
> Access Code: 285-394-368
> Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
>
> Meeting ID: 285-394-368
>
> GoToMeeting®
> Online Meetings Made Easy®
>
> Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your
> iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> >
> > Based on Doodle. Meeting  is schedule for  Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC.
> freenode:
> > #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks...  and I'll be rooting
> > > > for
> > > those
> > > > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices for
> > > > the community to adopt!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Agreed
> > > >>
> > > >> > -Original Message-
> > > >> > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > >> > On Behalf Of Will Stevens
> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM
> > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > >> > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I am speaking as a committer who has limited insight into the
> > > 'correct'
> > > >> way to do
> > > >> > this via Apache (so be gentle).  :)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I like the idea of a wiki page to

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix. 

Here are the details. 

1.  Please join my meeting.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368

2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.  Or, 
call in using your telephone.

United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385
Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358
Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331
Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388
Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909
Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413
Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281
Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
China (toll-free): 4008 866154
Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057
Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453
Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282
Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812
Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259
Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993
India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227
Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563
Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 263
Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880
Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 81016
Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860
Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 123 8367
Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051
New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579
Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789
Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565
Poland (toll-free): 00 800 3211434
Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139
Romania (toll-free): 0 800 410 025
Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914
Saudi Arabia (toll-free): 800 844 3636
Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000
South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451
Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593
Spain: +34 931 76 1534
Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442
Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 29001
Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691
United Arab Emirates (toll-free): 800 044 40444
United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209
United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817
United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2070
Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459
Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 32 148

Access Code: 285-394-368
Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

Meeting ID: 285-394-368

GoToMeeting® 
Online Meetings Made Easy®

Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your iPhone®, 
iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app.

> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Steve Wilson
> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> 
> Based on Doodle. Meeting  is schedule for  Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC.  freenode:
> #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
> 
> > When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks...  and I'll be rooting
> > > for
> > those
> > > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices for
> > > the community to adopt!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Agreed
> > >>
> > >> > -Original Message-
> > >> > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > >> > On Behalf Of Will Stevens
> > >> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > >> > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> > >> >
> > >> > I am speaking as a committer who has limited insight into the
> > 'correct'
> > >> way to do
> > >> > this via Apache (so be gentle).  :)
> > >> >
> > >> > I like the idea of a wiki page to help get everyone on the same
> > >> > page
> > and
> > >> to track
> > >> > the consensus as we move forward...
> > >> >
> > >> > I also agree that it is hard to come to a consensus on the list
> > because
> > >> it is really
> > >> > hard to have a constructive conversation on here in a timely
> > >> > manner
> > >> where the
> > >> > different voices can be heard.
> > >> >
> > >> > I think it would be interesting to schedule sessions/meetings on
> > >> > the
> > >> list so any
> > >> > interested party can join.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #768

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Abhinandan Prateek]

+1, keep it simple


> On 10-Dec-2014, at 4:21 am, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
> +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack.
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa  wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
>>> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
>>> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
>>> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
>>> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
>>> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
>>> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.
>>>
>>> This way we will have:
>>> - one main working branch (master)
>>> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
>>> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
>>> - master is aimed to remain stable
>>> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
>>> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
>>> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades
>>>
>>> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
>>>
>>> +1  approve
>>> +0  no opinion
>>> -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> that's what we do in libcloud.
>>
>> You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have to 
>> build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master.
>>
>> But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the previous 
>> minor.
>>
>> so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade.
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design & 
>>> Build
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>>> CloudStack Consulting
>>> CloudStack Software 
>>> Engineering
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>>> Support
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>>> Courses
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is 
>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under licens

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-6424) Citrix Xenserver 6.2 Support

[Yitao Jiang]

Hi, neo
currently we are using acs 4.2.1 ship with xenserver 6.2.0 without service
pack. Till now works pretty well.


---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:44 PM, neo (JIRA)  wrote:

> neo created CLOUDSTACK-6424:
> ---
>
>  Summary: Citrix Xenserver 6.2 Support
>  Key: CLOUDSTACK-6424
>  URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6424
>  Project: CloudStack
>   Issue Type: Improvement
>   Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
>   Components: Hypervisor Controller
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
>  Environment: Citrix Xenserver 6.2, Cloudstack 4.2.1
> Reporter: neo
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having issue configuring Cloudstack, later on reading release note
> found Citrix XenServer 6.2 is not supported with cloudstack 4.2.1
>
> Cloudstack 4.2.1 Release Note -
>
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.1/html/Release_Notes/supported-os.html#supported-hv
>
> but somewhere on bug, i have found its supported with cloudstack 4.2 even
> citrix updated this for Cloudplatform where they are saying XenServer 6.2
> is suported with Cloudplatform 4.2.1 and later
>
> http://support.citrix.com/cms/kc/cloud-troubleshooting/cloudplatform-compatibility-matrix/
>
> Its pretty confusing now, i'm experiencing some issue in cloudstack
> deployment which i think because of XenServer 6.2 support.
>
> Please confirm whether its supported or not and also update release note,
> release note really helps.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.2#6252)
>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #767

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...

[Yitao Jiang]

just wandering whether checking selected network supported userdata or not
On Dec 9, 2014 8:07 PM, "asfgit"  wrote:

> Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55
>
>
> ---
> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
> with INFRA.
> ---
>

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Mike Tutkowski]

+1

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav  >
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.
>
> This way we will have:
> - one main working branch (master)
> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
> - master is aimed to remain stable
> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades
>
> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
>
> +1  approve
> +0  no opinion
> -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
> >
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Windows Phone
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Rajani Karuturi]

+1


On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

Hi,

CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.

This way we will have:
- one main working branch (master)
- branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
- master is aimed to remain stable
- master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
- CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades

For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;

+1  approve
+0  no opinion
-1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 
Sent from Windows Phone

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Ian Duffy]

+1, it makes sense for cloudmonkey :)

On 9 December 2014 at 22:51, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack.
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa  wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> >> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> >> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
> >> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
> >> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
> >> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
> >> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.
> >>
> >> This way we will have:
> >> - one main working branch (master)
> >> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
> >> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
> >> - master is aimed to remain stable
> >> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
> >> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
> >> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades
> >>
> >> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
> >>
> >> +1  approve
> >> +0  no opinion
> >> -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> > that's what we do in libcloud.
> >
> > You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have
> to build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master.
> >
> > But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the
> previous minor.
> >
> > so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade.
> >
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Rohit Yadav
> >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> >> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> >> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >>
> >> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> >> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework >
> >> CloudStack Consulting
> >> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> >> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a
> company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> a registered trademark.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Daan Hoogland]

+1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa  wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
>> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
>> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
>> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
>> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
>> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
>> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.
>>
>> This way we will have:
>> - one main working branch (master)
>> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
>> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
>> - master is aimed to remain stable
>> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
>> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
>> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades
>>
>> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
>>
>> +1  approve
>> +0  no opinion
>> -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>
> +1
>
> that's what we do in libcloud.
>
> You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have to 
> build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master.
>
> But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the previous 
> minor.
>
> so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade.
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software 
>> Engineering
>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>> Support
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> Courses
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a 
>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>



-- 
Daan

Re: about to MERGE

[Mike Tutkowski]

Sounds good! :)

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> Hi would be transcribed in Dutch as haai, which means shark. leaving
> out the I (j-sound) would be transcribed as H (h-aa). aso it is less
> typing, way less. And as I hate typing a lot I really owe you the
> short answer; yes
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> > wrote:
> > I have a quick question.
> >
> > Is "H" a Daan-ism for "Hi"? :)
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Daan Hoogland  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> H,
> >>
> >> I had a contribution from  colleague on master that I cherry-picked on
> >> 4.4 and 4.5.  I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute.
> >> please alert me if this is inconvenient.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > *™*
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #766

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014

[David Nalley]

CVE isn't mentioned and probably should be.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:

> All,
>
> The board report is due again. Below the draft report, please send me your
> suggestions, additions, basically any kind of feedback.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage
> large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable
> Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.
>
> ISSUES
>
> None
>
> CURRENT ACTIVITY
> * The community is working on the next major release (4.5.0) of Apache
> CloudStack.
>  The first release candidate is available already.
> * Ongoing efforts in fixing bugs and findings from static code analysis
>  resulted in a number of bug fixes to existing branches.
> * Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11 2014. Apache
>  CloudStack CloudMonkey is a CLI tool for interacting with Apache
>  CloudStack and is distributed separate from Apache CloudStack
> * Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released Oct 23 2014. This maintenance
> release
>  will be followed by a second maintenance release 4.4.2 in December.
> * The community enjoyed a very successful European CloudStack
>  Collaboration Conference (CCCEU). CCCEU in Budapest. The new format
> including
>  a full day single room track and poster sessions seemed to work out well.
> * The community is still struggling with way to improve quality and
> prevent master
>  from breaking. Multiple efforts including improved automated testing and
> work flow
>  enhancements are being executed and/or proposed. There is no clear
> consensus other
>  than the generic agreement that the current situation leaves ample room
> for
>  improvement.
>
>
> RELEASES
> Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released on Oct 23, 2014.
> Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11, 2014
>
> COMMUNITY
> Including the following additions, CloudStack has 96 committers and 32 (+3)
> PMC members.
>
> New Committers:
> -
>
> New PMC Members:
> Ian Duffy (duffy)- Sep 29
> Pierre-Luc Dion (pdion891) - Sep 29
> Rajani Kuruturi (rajani) - Oct 16
>
> The Apache CloudStack project remains a high volume community:
>
> dev@ msgs = Nov: 1322, Oct: 1054, Sep: 1421
> users@ msgs = Nov: 670, Oct: 557, Sep: 481
> issues@ msgs = Nov: 1933, Oct: 1011, Sep: 1671
> commits@ msgs = Nov: 1039, Oct: 696, Sep: 826
> marketing@ msgs = Nov: 70, Oct: 60, Sep:69
> users-cn@ msgs = Nov: 120, Oct: 46, Sep: 61

Re: about to MERGE

[Daan Hoogland]

Hi would be transcribed in Dutch as haai, which means shark. leaving
out the I (j-sound) would be transcribed as H (h-aa). aso it is less
typing, way less. And as I hate typing a lot I really owe you the
short answer; yes

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> I have a quick question.
>
> Is "H" a Daan-ism for "Hi"? :)
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
>> H,
>>
>> I had a contribution from  colleague on master that I cherry-picked on
>> 4.4 and 4.5.  I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute.
>> please alert me if this is inconvenient.
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> *™*



-- 
Daan

CloudStack 4.4.1 Upgrade - View Console Not Working (Any Ideas)?

[Casey Cantwell]

Hello,

We upgraded Cloud Stack from 4.2 to 4.4.1 to address the Depreciation of
realhostip.com.  The installation was successful, and everything went
smoothly.  Unfortunately, the view console link is still not working.
We disabled SSL completely by setting secstorage.encrypt.copy to "false",
and changing consoleproxy.url.domain to empty.  It's a non production
system, and SSL isn't required.

This is the URL that is being called from CloudStack now:  (Before I got
the Apache page, telling me realhostip was deprecated and what to do)
http://9.72.78.1:8080/client/console?cmd=access&vm=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149d

This is what is returned in the management console log.  Does anyone have
any ideas what else needs to be configured, or changed?  I've been reading
everything I can on "Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not
authorized to pass it in", to try and resolve it.  Any ideas, hints, or
comments is greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance for reviewing.

Casey Cantwell


2014-12-09 11:20:42,001 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80) ===START===  9.72.44.101 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines&id=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149d&response=json&sessionkey=Sph11NRl%2B9FD9ToP4nk5h8E%2FXGk%3D&_=1418152841990
2014-12-09 11:20:42,005 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd]
(catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80 ctx-9ea2576d) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as
the caller is not authorized to pass it in
2014-12-09 11:20:42,009 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd]
(catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80 ctx-9ea2576d) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as
the caller is not authorized to pass it in
2014-12-09 11:20:42,030 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80 ctx-9ea2576d) ===END===  9.72.44.101 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines&id=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149d&response=json&sessionkey=Sph11NRl%2B9FD9ToP4nk5h8E%2FXGk%3D&_=1418152841990
2014-12-09 11:20:42,


2014-12-05 11:31:16,489 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79) ===START===  9.72.44.101 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines&id=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149d&response=json&sessionkey=J%2BzoAkWX%2B1TLv%2BjfbMYg0QAOLoA%3D&_=1417807876551
2014-12-05 11:31:16,493 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd]
(catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79 ctx-594e7854) Ignoring paremeter displayvm
as the caller is not authorized to pass it in
2014-12-05 11:31:16,496 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd]
(catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79 ctx-594e7854) Ignoring paremeter displayvm
as the caller is not authorized to pass it in
2014-12-05 11:31:16,518 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79 ctx-594e7854) ===END===  9.72.44.101 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines&id=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149d&response=json&sessionkey=J%2BzoAkWX%2B1TLv%2BjfbMYg0QAOLoA%3D&_=1417807876551

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Mike Tutkowski]

Yeah, I agree 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing.

What's not clear to me is how much coverage we currently have for that
release and how much of it is automated.

A lot of fixes went into it and that's awesome, but that does increase the
probability that something here or there was broken.

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Mike Tutkowski 
wrote:

> I see it listed on the website now. Thanks :)
>
> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rohit Yadav  > wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> 4.4.2 is already released.
>>
>> > On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0
>> and
>> > 4.3.2) at the same time.
>> >
>> > I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have
>> enough
>> > bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time.
>>
>> I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an
>> upcoming cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives,
>> automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season -
>> but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s
>> good to see so many initiatives.
>>
>> I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing
>> community;
>>
>> - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing
>> release(s)
>> - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs
>> along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from
>> source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging)
>> - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix
>> release and requires less bandwidth
>> - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing
>> and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of
>> changes and a new systemvmtemplate
>>
>> I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC
>> is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for
>> users and people in general to participate without building from source
>> (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> 
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> *™*
>
>

-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Mike Tutkowski]

I see it listed on the website now. Thanks :)

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> 4.4.2 is already released.
>
> > On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski  > wrote:
> >
> > I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0
> and
> > 4.3.2) at the same time.
> >
> > I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have
> enough
> > bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time.
>
> I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an upcoming
> cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives,
> automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season -
> but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s
> good to see so many initiatives.
>
> I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing
> community;
>
> - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing release(s)
> - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs
> along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from
> source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging)
> - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix
> release and requires less bandwidth
> - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing
> and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of
> changes and a new systemvmtemplate
>
> I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC
> is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for
> users and people in general to participate without building from source
> (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way).
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #765

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Mike,

4.4.2 is already released.

> On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski  
> wrote:
>
> I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and
> 4.3.2) at the same time.
>
> I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough
> bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time.

I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an upcoming 
cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives, automation/testing 
efforts are all happening around the holiday season - but this simply shows 
that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s good to see so many 
initiatives.

I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing community;

- include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing release(s)
- built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs along 
with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from source but I 
think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging)
- 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix release 
and requires less bandwidth
- 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing and 
regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of changes 
and a new systemvmtemplate

I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC is out 
and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for users and 
people in general to participate without building from source (I’m not 
suggesting to discourage building from source in any way).

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

> On 09-Dec-2014, at 11:27 pm, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we add 4.3.2 and 4.4.2 here as well?

4.4.2 is already released so we can add that but 4.3.2 is not yet released.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Mike Tutkowski]

Actually, it looks like we're considering the release of 4.4.2 in December
along with 4.5.0 and 4.3.2.

We definitely should make sure we give people sufficient time to test RCs
and not run VOTE threads simultaneously.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski  wrote:

> I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and
> 4.3.2) at the same time.
>
> I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have
> enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time.
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1
>> release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md
>>
>> I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014),
>> but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical
>> issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of
>> this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance
>> zones and it has worked for me so far.
>>
>> For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a
>> noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please
>> use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT:
>>
>> http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing
>>
>> If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this
>> thread. Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build> iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software Engineering> engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support> cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses> cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Mike Tutkowski]

I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and
4.3.2) at the same time.

I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough
bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1
> release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md
>
> I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014),
> but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical
> issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of
> this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance
> zones and it has worked for me so far.
>
> For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a
> noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please
> use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT:
>
> http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing
>
> If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this
> thread. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Based on Doodle. Meeting  is schedule for  Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC.  freenode:
#cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM.

Regards,



On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers 
> wrote:
> > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks...  and I'll be rooting for
> those
> > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices for the
> > community to adopt!
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Agreed
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> >> > Behalf Of Will Stevens
> >> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> >> > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> >> >
> >> > I am speaking as a committer who has limited insight into the
> 'correct'
> >> way to do
> >> > this via Apache (so be gentle).  :)
> >> >
> >> > I like the idea of a wiki page to help get everyone on the same page
> and
> >> to track
> >> > the consensus as we move forward...
> >> >
> >> > I also agree that it is hard to come to a consensus on the list
> because
> >> it is really
> >> > hard to have a constructive conversation on here in a timely manner
> >> where the
> >> > different voices can be heard.
> >> >
> >> > I think it would be interesting to schedule sessions/meetings on the
> >> list so any
> >> > interested party can join.  These sessions/meetings would happen in a
> >> format
> >> > like IRC where the transcript of the session can be later posted to
> the
> >> list as well
> >> > as a summary of the transcript so it can be reviewed by any member who
> >> could
> >> > not make the meeting.  This way we keep all of the actual conversation
> >> in the
> >> > list, but we also make it easier to actually have a 'conversation' at
> >> the same time.
> >> > It is hard to beat real time when working through this sort of stuff.
> >> >
> >> > Does this make sense to others?  Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Will
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *Will STEVENS*
> >> > Lead Developer
> >> >
> >> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw
> >> > @CloudOps_
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> >> > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Wearing my PMC hat and with past experience on these discussions we
> >> > > have not made much progress on mailing list despite agreeing on the
> >> > > goals and have locked horns. One possibility after reading Chip's
> >> > > email and concerns I see is that, we create a wiki outlining the
> >> > > problem space, possible
> >> > > solution(s) and their specific pros and cons and have people
> >> collaborate.
> >> > > Once a general consensus is there and wiki is stable we can bring it
> >> > > back to the mailing list for final approval. This is open as well as
> >> > > requires participant a higher degree of commitment to collaborate
> and
> >> > > will be more structured.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Animesh
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Chip Childers
> >> > > > 
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > Steve,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > (Speaking with my PMC hat on, but not as someone that has the
> time
> >> > > > > to help with this process)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I love the idea of moving forward with resolving some of the
> >> > > > > quality process / tooling / etc... challenges that we face as a
> >> > > > > project and community. I also love the idea that companies
> getting
> >> > > > > commercial value from this project are talking (as companies)
> >> > > > > about how to best support the project through either directing
> >> > > > > their employees to work on this problem, allowing those
> interested
> >> > > > > the time to do so, and / or offering (as Citrix did) required
> >> > > > > hardware/software resources to make improvements for the common
> >> > > > > good.  Importantly, I like that the companies involved are
> >> > > > > mutually agreeing that this is for the common good.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > That said, I have a concern about the outline below,
> specifically
> >> > > > > in how the definition of approach and eventual execution are
> >> handled.
> >> > > > > The proposal of taking this off-list until there is a "proposal
> to
> >> > > ratify"
> >> > > > > is what I'd like to see changed. I would fully expect that a
> >> > > > > fleshed out proposal hitting the list would be met with more
> >> > > > > discussion than you would like (and perhaps even met with
> >> frustration).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > What has worked well for us in the past, where there is a need
> to
> >> > > > > have those interested in "doing work" to be able to focus on
> that
> >> > > > > work, has been to start with a call for interested part

Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Ian Duffy]

Fantastic work Rohit! :)

I tested with the dev branch of devcloud4 binary installation basic [1].

Everything worked without issue, brought up a new ubuntu vm based of the
openvm.eu templates [2]. Template came up without issue, console worked,
password and hostname were successfully set.

Created SG group rules for HTTP and SSH. Both worked as expected.

[1]
https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/dev/binary-installation-basic
[2] http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/ubuntu/vanilla/jenkins/

On 9 December 2014 at 13:47, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1
> release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md
>
> I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014),
> but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical
> issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of
> this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance
> zones and it has worked for me so far.
>
> For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a
> noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please
> use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT:
>
> http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing
>
> If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this
> thread. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[sebgoa]

On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.
> 
> This way we will have:
> - one main working branch (master)
> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
> - master is aimed to remain stable
> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades
> 
> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
> 
> +1  approve
> +0  no opinion
> -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 

+1

that's what we do in libcloud.

You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have to build 
it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master.

But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the previous 
minor.

so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade. 


> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: Review Request 28836: CLOUDSTACK-8048: Fix test_ss_limits.py

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28836/#review64405
---

Ship it!


pushed to master and 4.5

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 9, 2014, 5:28 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28836/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 5:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8048
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8048
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Template object after creation of template does not have size attribute. List 
> the templates with template id and then access size.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_ss_limits.py 4d6efc4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28836/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Re: Review Request 28840: CLOUDSTACK-8049: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/#review64404
---

Ship it!


pushed to master and 4.5

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 9, 2014, 7:08 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 7:08 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8049
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8049
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Resize volume test cases can't be run on Simulator, hence tagging them as 
> required_hardware=True
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_ps_resize_volume.py 5df4a62 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> N/A
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Re: Review Request 28843: CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/#review64403
---


pushed to master and 4.5

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8053
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8053
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> The break condition for the loop is absent, hence eventually the list may be 
> containing less than two hosts, where was we need a cluster with more than 
> two hosts (hence the list).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_host_maintenance.py 7027469 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Re: Review Request 28843: CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/#review64402
---

Ship it!


- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8053
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8053
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> The break condition for the loop is absent, hence eventually the list may be 
> containing less than two hosts, where was we need a cluster with more than 
> two hosts (hence the list).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_host_maintenance.py 7027469 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

RE: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Stephen Turner]

+1 as long as CloudMonkey remains backwards compatible with older CloudStack 
releases, so that we don't have to preserve old monkeys to talk to old stacks.

-- 
Stephen Turner


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: 09 December 2014 13:26
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

Hi,

CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is 
simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has 
any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches 
when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify 
past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches 
such as 5.3/5.2 etc.

This way we will have:
- one main working branch (master)
- branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests 
or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
- master is aimed to remain stable
- master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
- CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward 
compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades

For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;

+1  approve
+0  no opinion
-1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did 
not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: about to MERGE

[Mike Tutkowski]

I have a quick question.

Is "H" a Daan-ism for "Hi"? :)

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> H,
>
> I had a contribution from  colleague on master that I cherry-picked on
> 4.4 and 4.5.  I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute.
> please alert me if this is inconvenient.
>
> --
> Daan
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014

[Wido den Hollander]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 12/09/2014 01:32 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> All,
> 
> The board report is due again. Below the draft report, please send
> me your suggestions, additions, basically any kind of feedback.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> 
> 
> DESCRIPTION Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to
> deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly
> available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud
> computing platform.
> 
> ISSUES
> 
> None
> 
> CURRENT ACTIVITY * The community is working on the next major
> release (4.5.0) of Apache CloudStack. The first release candidate
> is available already.

Shouldn't we add 4.3.2 and 4.4.2 here as well?

> * Ongoing efforts in fixing bugs and findings from static code
> analysis resulted in a number of bug fixes to existing branches. *
> Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11 2014.
> Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey is a CLI tool for interacting with
> Apache CloudStack and is distributed separate from Apache
> CloudStack * Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released Oct 23 2014. This
> maintenance release will be followed by a second maintenance
> release 4.4.2 in December. * The community enjoyed a very
> successful European CloudStack Collaboration Conference (CCCEU).
> CCCEU in Budapest. The new format including a full day single room
> track and poster sessions seemed to work out well. * The community
> is still struggling with way to improve quality and prevent master 
> from breaking. Multiple efforts including improved automated
> testing and work flow enhancements are being executed and/or
> proposed. There is no clear consensus other than the generic
> agreement that the current situation leaves ample room for 
> improvement.
> 
> 
> RELEASES Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released on Oct 23, 2014. 
> Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11, 2014
> 
> COMMUNITY Including the following additions, CloudStack has 96
> committers and 32 (+3) PMC members.
> 
> New Committers: -
> 
> New PMC Members: Ian Duffy (duffy)- Sep 29 Pierre-Luc Dion
> (pdion891) - Sep 29 Rajani Kuruturi (rajani) - Oct 16
> 
> The Apache CloudStack project remains a high volume community:
> 
> dev@ msgs = Nov: 1322, Oct: 1054, Sep: 1421 users@ msgs = Nov: 670,
> Oct: 557, Sep: 481 issues@ msgs = Nov: 1933, Oct: 1011, Sep: 1671 
> commits@ msgs = Nov: 1039, Oct: 696, Sep: 826 marketing@ msgs =
> Nov: 70, Oct: 60, Sep:69 users-cn@ msgs = Nov: 120, Oct: 46, Sep:
> 61
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=8jTt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Wido den Hollander]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 12/09/2014 02:25 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on
> master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the
> community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as
> the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say
> documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can
> be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also
> alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as
> 5.3/5.2 etc.
> 
> This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch
> based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull 
> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is
> aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and
> tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for
> progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with
> older releases and have clean upgrades
> 
> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
> 

+1

I think CloudMonkey is not complex enough (that's a good thing!) to
justify the need for multiple branches.

Just tags on master should be sufficient I think.

Wido

> +1  approve +0  no opinion -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91
> 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org |
> Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add
> it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack
> related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & 
> Build CSForge –
> rapid IaaS deployment framework 
> CloudStack
> Consulting CloudStack
> Software 
> Engineering 
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support 
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or
> related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents,
> nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India
> LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is
> a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The
> Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=gzBp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

[Marcus]

Yeah, that seems strange. I don't recall it working that way in the past.
It uses the standard iptables DNAT, and I believe the same methods as
static NAT to rewrite the destination ip. Do you see the same behavior with
static NAT on routing incoming traffic to a particular VM?

Just to make sure we're not confusing terms here, static NAT is a port
forward for all ports, basically mapping IP2 in whole to an instance.  I
think you're referring to SNAT (source NAT) when you say outbound static
NAT looks fine, but I'm not sure.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrija Panic 
wrote:

> Hi Marcus,
> static NAT (outound connections) works fine - when internal VM access
> internet, it's source address is replaced with the MAIN public IP of the
> VPC VR (call it IP1 in my example - x.x.x.x) - so all fine.
>
> Then I have additional public IPs to be able to do port forwarding... -
> when I do port forwarding on IP2 x.x.x.y (additional public IP on VR) to
> the internal IP on VM - the VR actually does some kind of proxying so to
> speak - so the source IP in the TCP/UDP packet that reach internal VM IP,
> appears to be the  IP1 x.x.x.x (main public IP of the VR)​ instead the real
> remote IP of the client...
>
> Will check the scripts - but this is serious issue in my opinion. I
> understand proxying (haproxy) works like every proxy - so the behaviour for
> the proxy is expected. But this behaviour for the port forwarding is NOT
> normal at all...
>
> THanks
>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #90

[jenkins]

See 

Re: ACS 4.3 - Fail to restart VPC - Exception with Null pointer

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Benoit,

Does this happen with 4.3.1 or 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT (latest from 4.3)? When you say 
you stopped and destroyed VPC, do you mean the whole VPC or a VM in your VPC?
How may I reproduce it on a clean ACS installation (I only have KVM/Xen)?

On Tuesday 09 December 2014 07:37 PM, benoit lair wrote:

Hello Folks,


I have stopped and destroyed my vpc (in order to reprovision it after
tweaking inside vm), but now i'm trying to restart my vpc (so trying to
recreate my vpc instance vm), but here is the error i have :

http://pastebin.com/fQixjbcF

Thanks for your responses.

Regards, Benoit Lair.



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #764

[jenkins]

See 

ACS 4.3 - Fail to restart VPC - Exception with Null pointer

[benoit lair]

Hello Folks,


I have stopped and destroyed my vpc (in order to reprovision it after
tweaking inside vm), but now i'm trying to restart my vpc (so trying to
recreate my vpc instance vm), but here is the error i have :

http://pastebin.com/fQixjbcF

Thanks for your responses.

Regards, Benoit Lair.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #763

[jenkins]

See 

[TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi everyone,

In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1
release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md

I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014),
but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical
issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of
this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance
zones and it has worked for me so far.

For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a
noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please
use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT:

http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing

If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this
thread. Thanks.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.

This way we will have:
- one main working branch (master)
- branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
- master is aimed to remain stable
- master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
- CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades

For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;

+1  approve
+0  no opinion
-1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: setting db.properties files

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Sebastien,

Create and use a db.properties.override file in the same location (utils/conf), 
this file is by default not included in git (it's in .gitignore).

Hope this helps.

On Tuesday 09 December 2014 06:26 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Hi,

I am dockering with cloudstack.

I need to update the db.properties file to set the db password and host to 
something other than localhost.
the host is actually in a env variable.

I can do it with a dirty hack like this:

sed -i "s/db.root.password=/db.root.password=$MYSQL_ENV_MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD/" 
utils/conf/db.properties

what's the best practice to change those db properties at "runtime" ?

thx,

-sebastien



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

setting db.properties files

[Sebastien Goasguen]

Hi,

I am dockering with cloudstack.

I need to update the db.properties file to set the db password and host to 
something other than localhost.
the host is actually in a env variable.

I can do it with a dirty hack like this:

sed -i "s/db.root.password=/db.root.password=$MYSQL_ENV_MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD/" 
utils/conf/db.properties

what's the best practice to change those db properties at "runtime" ?

thx,

-sebastien

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #89

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi France,

I'll try too go through them and see if I can fix them, everyone in the 
community is encouraged to help fix test.
If they are already fixed, I can help with backporting them and testing them.

I don't want to delay 4.3.2 release further because there is a security issue 
that will be shipped with 4.3.2 and we have not done any official ACS release 
to answer that, I think we should fix blockers or critical bugs for 4.3.2 and 
effort on testing it now. We'll keep working on these and other pending bugs, 
and if they don't make it to 4.3.2 we can always work on 4.3.3 etc.

On Monday 08 December 2014 03:06 PM, France wrote:

Hi Rohit,

Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in 
time for 4.3.2 release:

Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013

Failed to create a volume from snapshot:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014

Virtual Router only with DHCP should not have DNS service
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4675

Excessive use of LVM snapshots on XenServer, that leads to snapshot failure and 
unnecessary disk usage.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6060

Possibly this one too:
Failed to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume 372 
-> Failure from sparse_dd: Fatal error: exception Invalid_argument("index out 
of bounds”):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8044?filter=-2

Some others, you have already back-ported. For that we thank you.

Thank you,
Regards,
F.


On 20 Nov 2014, at 10:15, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I 
think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next couple 
of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months.
>
> I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to the 
4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any blocker/critical/major issue that 
you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to be fixed. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
Courses



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014

[Hugo Trippaers]

All,

The board report is due again. Below the draft report, please send me your 
suggestions, additions, basically any kind of feedback.

Cheers,

Hugo



DESCRIPTION
Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage 
large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable 
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

ISSUES

None

CURRENT ACTIVITY
* The community is working on the next major release (4.5.0) of Apache 
CloudStack.
 The first release candidate is available already.
* Ongoing efforts in fixing bugs and findings from static code analysis 
 resulted in a number of bug fixes to existing branches. 
* Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11 2014. Apache
 CloudStack CloudMonkey is a CLI tool for interacting with Apache
 CloudStack and is distributed separate from Apache CloudStack  
* Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released Oct 23 2014. This maintenance release
 will be followed by a second maintenance release 4.4.2 in December.
* The community enjoyed a very successful European CloudStack 
 Collaboration Conference (CCCEU). CCCEU in Budapest. The new format including
 a full day single room track and poster sessions seemed to work out well.
* The community is still struggling with way to improve quality and prevent 
master
 from breaking. Multiple efforts including improved automated testing and work 
flow 
 enhancements are being executed and/or proposed. There is no clear consensus 
other
 than the generic agreement that the current situation leaves ample room for 
 improvement.


RELEASES
Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released on Oct 23, 2014.
Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11, 2014

COMMUNITY
Including the following additions, CloudStack has 96 committers and 32 (+3) 
PMC members.

New Committers:
-

New PMC Members:
Ian Duffy (duffy)- Sep 29
Pierre-Luc Dion (pdion891) - Sep 29
Rajani Kuruturi (rajani) - Oct 16

The Apache CloudStack project remains a high volume community:

dev@ msgs = Nov: 1322, Oct: 1054, Sep: 1421
users@ msgs = Nov: 670, Oct: 557, Sep: 481
issues@ msgs = Nov: 1933, Oct: 1011, Sep: 1671
commits@ msgs = Nov: 1039, Oct: 696, Sep: 826
marketing@ msgs = Nov: 70, Oct: 60, Sep:69 
users-cn@ msgs = Nov: 120, Oct: 46, Sep: 61

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...

[bhaisaab]

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55#issuecomment-66272762
  
LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #762

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [ACS 4.3] Snapshots on secondary storage

[benoit lair]

Super, Thanks a lot Lucian !!

2014-12-08 18:16 GMT+01:00 Nux! :

> I think you need to take VOLUME snapshots for them to be stored on the SS.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "benoit lair" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 8 December, 2014 16:57:34
> > Subject: [ACS 4.3] Snapshots on secondary storage
>
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> >
> > My environment is ACS 4.3.0 with xenservers 6.2.0
> >
> > When taking snapshots, there are stocked in the primary storage
> (supposing
> > calling native xenservers apis).
> >
> > In my remembers i have already seen (with xenservers) snapshots stocked
> on
> > secondary storage.
> >
> > How can i achieve this ?
> >
> > My zone is an advanced one without sg, and there are two networks, one
> for
> > management, the other for the guest vlans (so no storage reserved
> physical
> > network).
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your responses.
> >
> > Regards, Benoit.
>

Review Request 28843: CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8053
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8053


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

The break condition for the loop is absent, hence eventually the list may be 
containing less than two hosts, where was we need a cluster with more than two 
hosts (hence the list).


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_host_maintenance.py 7027469 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/diff/


Testing
---

Yes.


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #761

[jenkins]

See 

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

[Axel Delahaye]

> On déc. 5, 2014, 5:55 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on 
> > master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch.
> 
> Axel Delahaye wrote:
> I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent
> 
> Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Send it separetely, Github PR on github.com/apache/cloudstack (Github is 
> more fun that ReviewBoard), I see you both have atos.net in email (assuming 
> you're both colleagues).
> Once we've that PR we can close this review request.

done, PR #55


- Axel


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/#review64022
---


On déc. 5, 2014, 5:56 après-midi, Jean-Francois Vincent wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/
> ---
> 
> (Updated déc. 5, 2014, 5:56 après-midi)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> VM creation user interface : added the Userdata field
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties 8abe874 
>   ui/index.jsp 4910b9f 
>   ui/scripts/instanceWizard.js c2d3030 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> tested done on 4.2.1. This patch was adapted for last master branch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jean-Francois Vincent
> 
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...

[axel-delahaye-wl]

GitHub user axel-delahaye-wl opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55

Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM creation step

https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/worldline/cloudstack master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #55


commit 068e508e3baa92295788920f521b96eefd442796
Author: Jean-Francois Vincent 
Date:   2014-12-08T15:50:29Z

Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM creation step




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Ovmsupport

[bhaisaab]

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9#issuecomment-66262896
  
Hi Funs,

Thanks for replying. Alright let us know when you've good set of 
integration tests, I'm halfway with a new integration testing system 
semi-automated by ansible that uses CloudStack to test CloudStack. In that I 
run KVM, Xen etc. as VMs on KVM hosts all managed by CloudStack.

Regards.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

about to MERGE

[Daan Hoogland]

H,

I had a contribution from  colleague on master that I cherry-picked on
4.4 and 4.5.  I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute.
please alert me if this is inconvenient.

-- 
Daan

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #760

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

[Rajani Karuturi]

I understand the problem now and agree that configurable isnt an option
here. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

~Rajani

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest
> >> > template version?
> >> Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as
> the
> >> sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user.
> >
> >
> >  The advantage I see with this is we need not do a patch release even if
> we
> > miss to update.
>
> I am ot sure I follow so let me phrase what I think should be one:
>
> systemvm replace code should be written that also edits the
> MinVRVersion. On upgrade this code should be run if an upgrade is
> needed.
>
> Missing in this is the problem that might occur when someone upgrades
> a systemvm and then has to upgrade to a version that also upgrades the
> system vm. For this we must introduce a patch level version that we
> promise never to touch as devs, so that users can use this for their
> own versions.
>
> Just making it configurable leaves a responsibility that is ours with
> the user. They shouldn't be able to make the mistake of entering to
> high a number for instance.
>
> --
> Daan
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: make the VPN feature work more reliable a...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/54


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds

[Rohit Yadav]

ShapeBlue has created a patch that fixes this issue for Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 
users, it available from their “main” deb/rpm repository. ShapeBlue has also 
published Apache CloudStack 4.4.2 debs/rpms on their main and upstream 
repositories.

Repository: http://shapeblue.com/packages
Release notes: 
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/wiki/Apache-CloudStack-4.3.1-ShapeBlue-Patch02
Source tag 4.3.1-shapeblue-02: 
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/releases/tag/shapeblue-4.3.1-02

Regards.

> On 09-Dec-2014, at 1:41 am, John Kinsella  wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds
>
> CVSS:
> 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
>
> Vendors:
> The Apache Software Foundation
> Citrix, Inc.
>
> Versions Afffected:
> Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4
>
> Description:
> Apache CloudStack may be configured to authenticate LDAP users.
> When so configured, it performs a simple LDAP bind with the name
> and password provided by a user.  Simple LDAP binds are defined
> with three mechanisms (RFC 4513): 1) username and password; 2)
> unauthenticated if only a username is specified; and 3) anonymous
> if neither username or password is specified.  Currently, Apache
> CloudStack does not check if the password was provided which could
> allow an attacker to bind as an unauthenticated user.
>
> Mitigation:
> Users of Apache CloudStack 4.4 and derivatives should update to the
> latest version (4.4.2)
>
> An updated release for Apache CloudStack 4.3.2 is in testing. Until
> that is released, we recommend following the mitigation below:
>
> By default, many LDAP servers are not configured to allow unauthenticated
> binds.  If the LDAP server in use allow this behaviour, a potential
> interim solution would be to consider disabling unauthenticated
> binds.
>
> Credit:
> This issue was identified by the Citrix Security Team.
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUhgUCAAoJEOom9N0pCN7SOQMQAKyBuhg25u3FcVOU5XMdGGpT
> 2kSVFoLFR74ObI8bdr3HP+2LdLf/Go9QBBrWlZ034FUj6OV0Ct5o8TNB6AHbv0qF
> Ar4N05JoGtPaDCe9sWV/+ykOJH8snQjnYwVFrLZlLw8Y/JUQ+I1yJBksw8a2/hT2
> vmYgYiAQyrEMMk4bhBBlEyaJFMhuMtKtgUqLDW8wmlhkt2acZMt/0BKxDwAO8o7m
> 6ypepPCmkPHUpD50tfcCI+K4ib/C5EOn40n4orM97/JHZLsCyhz5nk36eQMOQQz2
> fJlaA04fQSV4Cv7c+S0LPh5e4e6TPSrOW3O4/V2dkjK/GgP8kUoo7ivyjIw6d2oJ
> Z5vqqgxrmgwDjH58YfVu3tyVuDlOFTZfCLkhdoXMxHfMLYYKeXkffRli9XabxrE+
> AkVoXaQAumf8IzTLVSQztV18jC79kvEeCV0pFYOjb/X/gShemruqmCWVDulj1ax6
> tzoP+Bm2mQRyrRClY37R+q3cQ2z6eNAC/vAoYzhYBN1o63MYneLYDADhyE6YIGz0
> LTbDDGFn0WVdFDrqworHdYDIMW7HQFMNtsQuueeP7LBldsgyTmjmBMp+S3Tq27UT
> RaVgp3n9ZUPdzj/i1vvJBrATKUNmv1GDoy+C1GPNx423nEOe7dFkMJARlcbf5Pml
> 03DX+ot4Xan0P5HXPT+r
> =QqOf
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

[Daan Hoogland]

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
>>
>> > Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest
>> > template version?
>> Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as the
>> sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user.
>
>
>  The advantage I see with this is we need not do a patch release even if we
> miss to update.

I am ot sure I follow so let me phrase what I think should be one:

systemvm replace code should be written that also edits the
MinVRVersion. On upgrade this code should be run if an upgrade is
needed.

Missing in this is the problem that might occur when someone upgrades
a systemvm and then has to upgrade to a version that also upgrades the
system vm. For this we must introduce a patch level version that we
promise never to touch as devs, so that users can use this for their
own versions.

Just making it configurable leaves a responsibility that is ours with
the user. They shouldn't be able to make the mistake of entering to
high a number for instance.

-- 
Daan

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #759

[jenkins]

See 

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

[Rajani Karuturi]

>
> > Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest
> > template version?
> Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as the
> sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user.


 The advantage I see with this is we need not do a patch release even if we
miss to update.


~Rajani

Re: Review Request 22511: Allow use of simulator hypervisor from client gui

[Rohit Yadav]

> On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:19 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Looks like a handy feature, Leo can you send a new patch or have a 
> > discussion if we should have it? As Prasanna notes, this is not needed in 
> > production.
> 
> Leo Simons wrote:
> Hey Rohit thanks for checking in. It looks like I commented way back 
> when, but the reply was left as a draft due to my inability to understand 
> reviewboard. Ugh:
> 
> > As I understand it, simulator is only shown if
> > * the simulator hypervisor .jar plugin is included in the .war, and
> > * the runtime config then specifies it as an available hypervisor
> > 
> > so it's already hidden unless you're very specific about wanting to 
> show it...?
> 
> I completely forgot about it, and since then I've had about 0 time to 
> look at selenium testing and whatnot.
> 
> Looking at it with a bit of experience I guess we could have the 
> simulator build go and patch up the javascript sources or something like 
> that, but, I don't think its useful to put that in if we're not going to have 
> tests to go with it.
> 
> So I guess we can close this for now.

Alright, I would still love to have the sql related change so developers can 
use something like cloudmonkey or psCloudStack to deploy VMs on simulator and 
play around.


- Rohit


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/#review64033
---


On June 12, 2014, 12:31 p.m., Leo Simons wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/
> ---
> 
> (Updated June 12, 2014, 12:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6903
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6903
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6903 for details.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   setup/db/hypervisor_capabilities.simulator.sql 32f9aaa 
>   ui/scripts/system.js 7e3b457 
>   ui/scripts/zoneWizard.js 0a84bdb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Ran
> 
> mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb
> mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator
> mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator
> CTRL+C
> mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator
> mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator
> 
> Then hand-clicked in the web browser, and followed the wizard to create a new 
> zone using the simulator hpv. (hosts must be named starting with "sim" for 
> discovery to work).
> 
> Then, re-set database, skipped the wizard and created zone/cluster/host/etc 
> manually.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Leo Simons
> 
>

RE: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Prashant Kumar Mishra]

From the  xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS settings) 
for that particular vm . 

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

Recent reply from Vadim:
http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html

On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar  wrote:

> Hi Star,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
> how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command 
> for xenserver host?
>
> waiting for your reply.
>
> Regards,
> Rajasekhar.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the 
> > network rate of global configuration.
> > If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of 
> > the VM and focus on   ... .
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Star Guo
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> > 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> > 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the 
> > Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute 
> > offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network 
> > Throttling Rate(default 200
> > Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> >
> > please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rajasekhar.
> >
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Andrija Panic]

Recent reply from Vadim:
http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html

On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar  wrote:

> Hi Star,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
> how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for
> xenserver host?
>
> waiting for your reply.
>
> Regards,
> Rajasekhar.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the network
> > rate of global configuration.
> > If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM
> > and focus on   ... .
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Star Guo
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> > 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> > 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network
> > Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in
> > global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200
> > Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> >
> > please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rajasekhar.
> >
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić