Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Forrest Xia]

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Donald Woods  wrote:

> The plugins have to be rebuilt for 2.2, as the CAR files include references
> to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, which the released 2.2 server doesn't include aliases
> for  Once the 2.2 server artifacts have been replicated to the mirror
> repos, I'll update the openjpa2 plugin and publish new snapshots and update
> the XML file.
>
> David, can you update the XML file for geronimo-2.2?
>
> Maybe Ivan or someone else will have time to look at the Samples.
>

I will look at the Samples.

>
>
> -Donald
>
> Forrest

Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Donald Woods]

The plugins have to be rebuilt for 2.2, as the CAR files include 
references to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, which the released 2.2 server doesn't 
include aliases for  Once the 2.2 server artifacts have been 
replicated to the mirror repos, I'll update the openjpa2 plugin and 
publish new snapshots and update the XML file.


David, can you update the XML file for geronimo-2.2?

Maybe Ivan or someone else will have time to look at the Samples.


-Donald


frapien wrote:

can any one please update the number for 2.2-SNAPSHOT in
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/openjpa2/geronimo-plugins.xml?
 good lock
--frank


<
David Jencks wrote:

I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.

I've tried to figure out what needs to go to 
the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ 
  and set up


http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/

with what I think needs to go there.  Could this get some review perhaps 
from people who have done releases before?

Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[frapien]

can any one please update the number for 2.2-SNAPSHOT in
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/openjpa2/geronimo-plugins.xml?
 good lock
--frank


<
David Jencks wrote:
> I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.
> 
> I've tried to figure out what needs to go to 
> the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ 
>   and set up
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/
> 
> with what I think needs to go there.  Could this get some review perhaps 
> from people who have done releases before?


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--geronimo-2.2-release-%282nd-try%29-tp26691840s134p26774135.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Joe Bohn]

You can compare it to the 2.1.4 files located here for reference: 
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.1.4/


I took a quick look.  Things looked fairly similar to what we included 
in previous releases.  Missing from your setup were the LICENSE, NOTICE, 
and RELEASE_NOTES.  I'm not sure how critical the LICENSE & NOTICE are 
... but it doesn't hurt to include them.  I think the RELEASE_NOTES are 
important because they are typically included in a reference from the 
download page.  I know I sound like a broken record here but I think 
this is really important with 2.2 because the RELEASE_NOTES are not 
included in the assembly images.  I would personally recommend to 
include the README in this location as well with a link from the 
download page for similar reasons with 2.2.


I thought I had a script I used for previous release but I can't find it 
at the moment.


One more thing - At one time there were storage issues on the dist 
server and so we were asked to keep just the most important releases at 
that location and update all other references on the download pages to 
the archive.  Now that 2.2 is being added we should consider removing 
2.1.3 leaving only 2.2 and 2.1.4.


Joe


David Jencks wrote:

I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.

I've tried to figure out what needs to go to 
the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ 
  and set up


http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/

with what I think needs to go there.  Could this get some review perhaps 
from people who have done releases before?


Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff?  I did this:

   123  19:32   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2
   127  19:33   cp 
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release* 
../2.2/
   128  19:35   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
   129  19:36   cp 
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/*bin.* 
../2.2/
   130  19:37   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
   131  19:38   cp 
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/*bin.* 
../2.2/
   132  19:38   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
   133  19:39   cp 
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/*bin.* 
../2.2/
   134  19:40   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
   135  19:40   cp 
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/*bin.* 
../2.2/
   136  19:41   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
   137  19:42   cp 
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/*bin.* 
../2.2/


thanks
david jencks

On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:


I've waited long enough.

We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet 
profile tcks.


+1:  kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn, 
linsun  (all pmc)


no other votes.

I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the 
release download page.


thanks
david jencks


On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using 
the maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 



The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz 

Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[David Jencks]

I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.

I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ 
  and set up


http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/

with what I think needs to go there.  Could this get some review  
perhaps from people who have done releases before?


Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff?  I did this:

   123  19:32   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2
   127  19:33   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release* ../2.2/

   128  19:35   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
   129  19:36   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/

   130  19:37   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
   131  19:38   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/

   132  19:38   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
   133  19:39   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/

   134  19:40   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
   135  19:40   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/

   136  19:41   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
   137  19:42   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/


thanks
david jencks

On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:


I've waited long enough.

We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic  
servlet profile tcks.


+1:  kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,  
linsun  (all pmc)


no other votes.

I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for  
the release download page.


thanks
david jencks


On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built  
using the maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965

Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip

If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure  
something plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

[PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[David Jencks]

I've waited long enough.

We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet  
profile tcks.


+1:  kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,  
linsun  (all pmc)


no other votes.

I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the  
release download page.


thanks
david jencks


On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using  
the maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965

Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip

If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure  
something plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Bill Stoddard]

Lin Sun wrote:

+1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified
a few link function okay.

Thanks for pulling together this release David.  I visited the jira
list, it contains hundreds of items!

  
Indeed, that's an impressive list!  Lots of good stuff in this release. 
Congrats!


Bill

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Lin Sun]

+1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified
a few link function okay.

Thanks for pulling together this release David.  I visited the jira
list, it contains hundreds of items!

Lin

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:56 AM, David Jencks  wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Joe Bohn]

I'm still not happy about the README & RELEASE_NOTES missing from the 
assemblies ... so I was kinda hoping some other more critical problem 
was found so that we could include these on a re-spin :-) .  However, I 
don't think it makes sense to stop the vote for just that so here is my 
+1.


Everything else I checked looked good.

Joe



David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the 
maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 



The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz 

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Donald Woods]

+1

Ran Tomcat assembly on my Mac with JDK 1.6 and a couple small samples.


-Donald


David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the 
maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 



The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz 

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[David Jencks]

+1

Jason and I also ran the jaspic tck (which is separate from the javaee  
tck).  After a little reconfiguration the servlet profile tests all  
pass.


I'd like to call the vote soon, if you would like to vote please do so  
soon.


thanks
david jencks
On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jason Warner wrote:

+1 from me.  I built the server and then ran the full tck  
successfully.


~Jason Warner


On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire   
wrote:
I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of  
problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not.  I guess  
they're not, so here's my +1 too.


Rick

Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1.
I reviewed the source and binaries in 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/

--kevan

On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using  
the maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 
 


Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 
 



The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz 
 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip 
 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure  
something plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Jay D. McHugh]

+1

I built the server from the source tar and was able to deploy and run my
app (includes EJBs, JPA, messaging, JSPs).

Jay

David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
> 
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
> 
> See the jira issues here:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> 
> 
> Staged to
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> 
> 
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> 
> 
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
> 
> 
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> 
> Many thanks
> david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Jason Warner]

+1 from me.  I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully.

~Jason Warner


On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire  wrote:

> I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems
> raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not.  I guess they're not, so
> here's my +1 too.
>
> Rick
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> Here's my +1.
>> I reviewed the source and binaries in
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>  I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
>>> maven-release-plugin.
>>>
>>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>>
>>> See the jira issues here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965<
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>>> >
>>>
>>> Staged to
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/<
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz<
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>>> >
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip<
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>>> plausible builds from them.
>>>
>>>
>>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Rick McGuire]

I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems 
raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not.  I guess they're not, 
so here's my +1 too.


Rick

Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1. 

I reviewed the source and binaries 
in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/


--kevan

On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using 
the maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 



The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz 

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Kevan Miller]

Here's my +1. 

I reviewed the source and binaries in 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/

--kevan

On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the 
> maven-release-plugin.
> 
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
> 
> See the jira issues here:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
> 
> Staged to
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
> 
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
> 
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
> plausible builds from them.
> 
> 
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> 
> Many thanks
> david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Rick McGuire]

Ashish Jain wrote:

Hi David,

Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are 
you able to access the links?

Try this one:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/

For some reason, this link is going to the -024 version, not the -043 
version in David's email.


Rick




Thanks
Ashish

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks > wrote:


I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built
using the maven-release-plugin.

This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/


The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz



https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
something plausible builds from them.


[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[Ashish Jain]

Hi David,

Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are you able
to access the links?

Thanks
Ashish

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks  wrote:

> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release-plugin.
>
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
> See the jira issues here:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
>
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>

[VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)

[David Jencks]

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using  
the maven-release-plugin.


This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965

Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip

If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something  
plausible builds from them.



[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks