Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Non-binding, +1
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:31 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> +1
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> > Good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >
> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
> TCK.
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
> >
> > The source release is here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > The tag can be found here
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
> >
> > [+1] ship it
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
+1
-David
On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
> The source release is here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>
> The tag can be found here
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
> [+1] ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
+1, thanks Mark.
2013/12/2 Mark Struberg
> Anyone else likes to vote?
> We are still low on votes.
>
> All the people who discussed on the java6 vs java7 question for JavaEE7:
> this question is solved. compiling with target java6 is perfectly fine.
> Please cast your votes now.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Mark Struberg
> *To:* geronimo-dev
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53
> *Subject:* [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
> TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
> The source release is here
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>
> The tag can be found here
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
> [+1] ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Anyone else likes to vote?
We are still low on votes.
All the people who discussed on the java6 vs java7 question for JavaEE7: this
question is solved. compiling with target java6 is perfectly fine. Please cast
your votes now.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
>
> From: Mark Struberg
>To: geronimo-dev
>Sent: Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53
>Subject: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>
>
>
>Good evening!
>
>
>I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
>
>
>The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
>
>The staging repo is
>
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
>
>The source release is here
>
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>
>The tag can be found here
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
>[+1] ship it
>[+0] meh, don't care
>[-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
>Here is my +1
>
>LieGrue,
>strub
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
+1
Thanks guys
2013/11/26 Romain Manni-Bucau
> Signature are available here
>
> https://java.net/projects/jbatch/sources/jsr-352-git-repository/show/JSR352.Tests.TCK?rev=6126835af9eb5dedb24825826820d1b7476e78e9
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/26 Alan D. Cabrera :
> > +1 looks good
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > Good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >
> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
> TCK.
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
> >
> > The source release is here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > The tag can be found here
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
> >
> > [+1] ship it
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Signature are available here
https://java.net/projects/jbatch/sources/jsr-352-git-repository/show/JSR352.Tests.TCK?rev=6126835af9eb5dedb24825826820d1b7476e78e9
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/26 Alan D. Cabrera :
> +1 looks good
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
> The source release is here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>
> The tag can be found here
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
> [+1] ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
+1 looks good
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
> The source release is here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>
> The tag can be found here
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
> [+1] ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
There's no TCK for this spec? I imagine if it passes the TCK then we're good.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
> nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
> whole stack.
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
>> Hi Romain,
>> That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires Java SE
>> 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment,
>> they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't
>> override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
>>
>> It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual requirement
>> will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java EE
>> environments. I guess we'll find out...
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
>>>
>>> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
>>> requires Java 6 or higher. "
>>>
>>> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
Good evening!
I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
TCK.
The staging repo is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
The source release is here
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
The tag can be found here
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
[+1] ship it
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] nope, because ${reason}
Here is my +1
LieGrue,
strub
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
> so maybe no need to discuss it a lot in this thread ;).
I agree.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> for new spec I don't see how j7 could help to solve anything, for old
> it is possible. But well this is not blocking at all IMO so maybe no
> need to discuss it a lot in this thread ;).
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
> > Hi Romain,
> > From a runtime perspective, which in turn would require the build...
> >
> > From an EE Container perspective (EE.2.4.1):
> > "This specification requires that containers provide a Java Compatible™
> > runtime environment, as defined by the Java Platform, Standard Edition,
> v7
> > specification (Java SE)."
> >
> > Also, in section EE.6.1.1:
> > "The containers provide all application components with at least the Java
> > Platform, Standard Edition, v7 (Java SE) APIs."
> > "In particular, the applet execution environment must be Java SE 7
> > compatible."
> >
> > And, then in the EE.8.3.x sections for the various classloading
> requirements
> > across the containers:
> > "All Java SE 7 API classes."
> >
> > And, finally in the Additional Requirements section (EE.B.1.1):
> > "Java EE 7 requires Java SE 7."
> >
> > I know there are items in the JPA stack that require Java 7. I just
> assumed
> > that Java 7 would be the minimum until I saw your post about the Java
> Batch
> > API...
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kevin,
> >>
> >> java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
> >> nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
> >> whole stack.
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
> >> > Hi Romain,
> >> > That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires
> >> > Java SE
> >> > 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE
> environment,
> >> > they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they
> can't
> >> > override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
> >> >
> >> > It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual
> >> > requirement
> >> > will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java
> >> > EE
> >> > environments. I guess we'll find out...
> >> >
> >> > Kevin
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Mark,
> >> >>
> >> >> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec
> >> >> says
> >> >>
> >> >> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
> >> >> requires Java 6 or higher. "
> >> >>
> >> >> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
> >> >> > Good evening!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352
> >> >> > JBatch
> >> >> > TCK.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The staging repo is
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The source release is here
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The tag can be found here
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [+1] ship it
> >> >> > [+0] meh, don't care
> >> >> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Here is my +1
> >> >> >
> >> >> > LieGrue,
> >> >> > strub
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
for new spec I don't see how j7 could help to solve anything, for old
it is possible. But well this is not blocking at all IMO so maybe no
need to discuss it a lot in this thread ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
> Hi Romain,
> From a runtime perspective, which in turn would require the build...
>
> From an EE Container perspective (EE.2.4.1):
> "This specification requires that containers provide a Java Compatible™
> runtime environment, as defined by the Java Platform, Standard Edition, v7
> specification (Java SE)."
>
> Also, in section EE.6.1.1:
> "The containers provide all application components with at least the Java
> Platform, Standard Edition, v7 (Java SE) APIs."
> "In particular, the applet execution environment must be Java SE 7
> compatible."
>
> And, then in the EE.8.3.x sections for the various classloading requirements
> across the containers:
> "All Java SE 7 API classes."
>
> And, finally in the Additional Requirements section (EE.B.1.1):
> "Java EE 7 requires Java SE 7."
>
> I know there are items in the JPA stack that require Java 7. I just assumed
> that Java 7 would be the minimum until I saw your post about the Java Batch
> API...
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
>> nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
>> whole stack.
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
>> > Hi Romain,
>> > That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires
>> > Java SE
>> > 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment,
>> > they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't
>> > override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
>> >
>> > It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual
>> > requirement
>> > will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java
>> > EE
>> > environments. I guess we'll find out...
>> >
>> > Kevin
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Mark,
>> >>
>> >> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec
>> >> says
>> >>
>> >> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
>> >> requires Java 6 or higher. "
>> >>
>> >> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
>> >> > Good evening!
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>> >> >
>> >> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352
>> >> > JBatch
>> >> > TCK.
>> >> >
>> >> > The staging repo is
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>> >> >
>> >> > The source release is here
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>> >> >
>> >> > The tag can be found here
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>> >> >
>> >> > [+1] ship it
>> >> > [+0] meh, don't care
>> >> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>> >> >
>> >> > Here is my +1
>> >> >
>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >> > strub
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Hi Romain,
>From a runtime perspective, which in turn would require the build...
>From an EE Container perspective (EE.2.4.1):
"This specification requires that containers provide a Java Compatible™
runtime environment, as defined by the Java Platform, Standard Edition, v7
specification (Java SE)."
Also, in section EE.6.1.1:
"The containers provide all application components with at least the Java
Platform, Standard Edition, v7 (Java SE) APIs."
"In particular, the applet execution environment must be Java SE 7
compatible."
And, then in the EE.8.3.x sections for the various classloading
requirements across the containers:
"All Java SE 7 API classes."
And, finally in the Additional Requirements section (EE.B.1.1):
"Java EE 7 requires Java SE 7."
I know there are items in the JPA stack that require Java 7. I just
assumed that Java 7 would be the minimum until I saw your post about the
Java Batch API...
Kevin
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
> nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
> whole stack.
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
> > Hi Romain,
> > That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires
> Java SE
> > 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment,
> > they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't
> > override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
> >
> > It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual
> requirement
> > will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java EE
> > environments. I guess we'll find out...
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mark,
> >>
> >> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec
> says
> >>
> >> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
> >> requires Java 6 or higher. "
> >>
> >> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
> >> > Good evening!
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >> >
> >> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352
> JBatch
> >> > TCK.
> >> >
> >> > The staging repo is
> >> >
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
> >> >
> >> > The source release is here
> >> >
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
> >> >
> >> > The tag can be found here
> >> >
> >> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
> >> >
> >> > [+1] ship it
> >> > [+0] meh, don't care
> >> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
> >> >
> >> > Here is my +1
> >> >
> >> > LieGrue,
> >> > strub
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Hi Kevin,
java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
whole stack.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/26 Kevin Sutter :
> Hi Romain,
> That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires Java SE
> 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment,
> they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't
> override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
>
> It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual requirement
> will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java EE
> environments. I guess we'll find out...
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
>>
>> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
>> requires Java 6 or higher. "
>>
>> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
>> > Good evening!
>> >
>> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>> >
>> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
>> > TCK.
>> >
>> > The staging repo is
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>> >
>> > The source release is here
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>> >
>> > The tag can be found here
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>> >
>> > [+1] ship it
>> > [+0] meh, don't care
>> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>> >
>> > Here is my +1
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Hi Romain,
That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires Java
SE 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment,
they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't
override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.
It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual requirement
will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java EE
environments. I guess we'll find out...
Kevin
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
>
> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
> requires Java 6 or higher. "
>
> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
> > Good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >
> > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
> TCK.
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
> >
> > The source release is here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > The tag can be found here
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
> >
> > [+1] ship it
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, because ${reason}
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
+1 for me, thanks Mark!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/26 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> indeed, it should.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/26 Mark Struberg
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>> >
>> > Hi Mark,
>> >
>> > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec
>> > says
>> >
>> > "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
>> > requires Java 6 or higher. "
>> >
>> > Not sure it is a blocker or not.
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
>> >> Good evening!
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>> >>
>> >> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352
>> >> JBatch
>> > TCK.
>> >>
>> >> The staging repo is
>> >>
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>> >>
>> >> The source release is here
>> >>
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>> >>
>> >> The tag can be found here
>> >>
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>> >>
>> >> [+1] ship it
>> >> [+0] meh, don't care
>> >> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>> >>
>> >> Here is my +1
>> >>
>> >> LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
indeed, it should.
JLouis
2013/11/26 Mark Struberg
> Hi!
>
> But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec
> says
> >
> > "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
> > requires Java 6 or higher. "
> >
> > Not sure it is a blocker or not.
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
> >> Good evening!
> >>
> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
> >>
> >> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
> > TCK.
> >>
> >> The staging repo is
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
> >>
> >> The source release is here
> >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
> >>
> >> The tag can be found here
> >>
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
> >>
> >> [+1] ship it
> >> [+0] meh, don't care
> >> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
> >>
> >> Here is my +1
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Hi!
But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
>
> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
> requires Java 6 or higher. "
>
> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
>> Good evening!
>>
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>>
>> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch
> TCK.
>>
>> The staging repo is
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>>
>> The source release is here
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> The tag can be found here
>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>>
>> [+1] ship it
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Hi Mark,
"the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
"This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
requires Java 6 or higher. "
Not sure it is a blocker or not.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/25 Mark Struberg :
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
> The source release is here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>
> The tag can be found here
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
> [+1] ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
[VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Good evening!
I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
The staging repo is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
The source release is here
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
The tag can be found here
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
[+1] ship it
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] nope, because ${reason}
Here is my +1
LieGrue,
strub
