RE: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-18 Thread Zakharov, Vasily M

> What do you mean by "HTTP interface works badly"? Slow? Exceptions?

It only shows the left frame. The HTML source of the page seems
truncated at some point.
I couldn't find any entries in the log concerning this problem, I'd
investigate further.

> What platform are you using? Linux or Windows?

Windows XP Pro on my notebook.

> As far as I understood you already got a patch for GERONIMO-3757.
> If so could you please attach it to the issue? :)

What I have now is not a patch, but a hotfix workaround.
Sure, I'll try to make a valid patch out of it.

What I'm not sure is how should I check the patch before it can be
considered valid - sure I can run GUT on Sun and Harmony, but otherwise
there's so many Geronimo release bundles and platforms that it would be
difficult to make sure I didn't break anything in complex Geronimo
structure.

> I also think that it would be nice to add the list of Harmony
> and Geronimo issues related to Geronimo on Harmony to the wiki page
> you have created.

Well, I have all the actual issues mentioned there.
Do you mean it makes sense to have a separate listing of JIRA numbers
somewhere?
Do you mean only actual open issues, or fixed/closed also?

Vasily


-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:57 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

Great news, Vasily!

What do you mean by "HTTP interface works badly"? Slow? Exceptions?
What platform are you using? Linux or Windows?

As far as I understood you already got a patch for GERONIMO-3757. If
so could you please attach it to the issue? :)

I also think that it would be nice to add the list of Harmony and
Geronimo issues related to Geronimo on Harmony to the wiki page you
have created.

Thanks in advance.

SY, Alexey

2008/1/18, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, all,
>
> Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
> Harmony!
> Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
> details.
>
> Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed
and
> wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.
>
> Three important problems that still need investigation are:
> - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
> - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
> available so the machine is 100% busy.
> - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.
>
> Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
> SPECjAppServer2004.
> No serious load was tested however.
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
>
> [1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Apache+Harmony
>
>


RE: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-18 Thread Zakharov, Vasily M

It's not the latest, but rather recent - I used r610339.

Hmm, good idea, thanks! :)

Vasily


-Original Message-
From: Jarek Gawor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:49 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

Cool!

Is this with latest Harmony snapshot? Also, if you rename or remove
the bin/jpa.jar you should be able to use the Geronimo scripts to
start up the server.

Jarek

On Jan 17, 2008 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
> Harmony!
> Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
> details.
>
> Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed
and
> wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.
>
> Three important problems that still need investigation are:
> - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
> - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
> available so the machine is 100% busy.
> - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.
>
> Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
> SPECjAppServer2004.
> No serious load was tested however.
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
>
> [1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Apache+Harmony
>
>

Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, 
Chapayevsky Per, 14.

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.



Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-17 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Great news, Vasily!

What do you mean by "HTTP interface works badly"? Slow? Exceptions?
What platform are you using? Linux or Windows?

As far as I understood you already got a patch for GERONIMO-3757. If
so could you please attach it to the issue? :)

I also think that it would be nice to add the list of Harmony and
Geronimo issues related to Geronimo on Harmony to the wiki page you
have created.

Thanks in advance.

SY, Alexey

2008/1/18, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, all,
>
> Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
> Harmony!
> Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
> details.
>
> Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed and
> wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.
>
> Three important problems that still need investigation are:
> - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
> - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
> available so the machine is 100% busy.
> - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.
>
> Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
> SPECjAppServer2004.
> No serious load was tested however.
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Apache+Harmony
>
>


Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-17 Thread Jarek Gawor
Cool!

Is this with latest Harmony snapshot? Also, if you rename or remove
the bin/jpa.jar you should be able to use the Geronimo scripts to
start up the server.

Jarek

On Jan 17, 2008 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
> Harmony!
> Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
> details.
>
> Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed and
> wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.
>
> Three important problems that still need investigation are:
> - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
> - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
> available so the machine is 100% busy.
> - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.
>
> Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
> SPECjAppServer2004.
> No serious load was tested however.
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Apache+Harmony
>
>


RE: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-17 Thread Zakharov, Vasily M

> Strange about the behavior under HTTP...

I'm amazed too. I thought it was critical problem until I tried HTTPS to
make sure SSL is working - and bingo, it was fine that way. Some stupid
problem in Harmony, I suppose.

Vasily


-Original Message-
From: Kevan Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:26 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!


On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

> Hi, all,
>
> Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
> Harmony!
> Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
> details.
>
> Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed  
> and
> wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.
>
> Three important problems that still need investigation are:
> - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
> - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
> available so the machine is 100% busy.
> - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.
>
> Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
> SPECjAppServer2004.
> No serious load was tested however.

Nice. Congrats Vasily.

Sounds like we have a little ways to go... Let us know what you find  
about memory and CPU consumption...

Strange about the behavior under HTTP...

--kevan



Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-17 Thread Kevan Miller


On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:


Hi, all,

Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
Harmony!
Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
details.

Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed  
and

wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.

Three important problems that still need investigation are:
- HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
- The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
available so the machine is 100% busy.
- The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.

Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
SPECjAppServer2004.
No serious load was tested however.


Nice. Congrats Vasily.

Sounds like we have a little ways to go... Let us know what you find  
about memory and CPU consumption...


Strange about the behavior under HTTP...

--kevan


Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!

2008-01-17 Thread Zakharov, Vasily M
Hi, all,

Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
Harmony!
Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
details.

Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed and
wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.

Three important problems that still need investigation are:
- HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine).
- The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have
available so the machine is 100% busy.
- The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option.

Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy
SPECjAppServer2004.
No serious load was tested however.

Vasily Zakharov
Intel ESSD

[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Apache+Harmony