Re: Java Adventure Builder Reference application, status

2005-12-20 Thread Jakob Færch (Trifork)
Whoohooo! I had lots of work the past week and couldn't spend much time 
on it. Thanks for taking it over during that time (but please attach 
your work to the JIRA issue as soon as possible).


To make best use of our time, maybe we should let me have a try at the 
application specific things?



What do you mean? Let's talk it over.

I haven't yet succeeden in having the maven script unpack a new server 
automatically, and the startup procedure I'm managed to get working is 
very clumsy. Maybe you could look into these issues some time? If you 
want it, I could distribute the diff on my sandbox/adventurebuilder 
directory now - if you don't need it, I'll wait until the application 
is  working.


What I meant was that it would be very nice, if you could spare the time 
to fix the unpack server/distribute application issues.


I guess from your questions regarding the maven deploy plugin that you 
might already be onto this.


I still haven't gotten nearer resolving the issue I was referring to in 
my mail of 2005-12-15 (the findByPrimaryKey method which doesn't see an 
entity created in the same transaction ctx).
My mail didn't foster any responses; would it be possible for you to ask 
someone who's in the know about OpenEJB whether this looks like a bug or 
a deployment issue?


If you could publish your changes by attaching a patch to the JIRA 
issue, it would be the best way to go on (and hopefully invite others to 
contribute). I'll be committing my changes later today.


My status is now that I've finally gotten the various web services and 
JMS queues wired up so well that I can submit and order and see it reach 
 Completed State. I have an issue with the activity supplier sending 
quite a lot of duplicate invoices. I'll look into that today, but I 
guess it would make sense for me to create another patch.


Should I make another patch against revision 357942, or should I wait 
for you to commit your work and the patches I uploaded yesterday, and 
then make the patch against those files?


Kindly,
Jakob


Re: Java Adventure Builder Reference application, status

2005-12-17 Thread Jacek Laskowski

Jakob Færch (Trifork) wrote:

My status is that I have AB deploying without errors on the (broken) 
1.0-prebuild.


Compared to the plans/sql in the repository, so far I have:
- Set up (more) correct references to web services
- Added undefined web service endpoints
- Started to get the autogenerated primary keys for CMP's working
  (using your work from the Pet Store as template)


Hi Jakob,

Whenever you have got something worth publishing, please create a patch 
and attach it to the JIRA issue. The more often it is done, the better. 
It makes our work much helpful to others who would like to contribute.


I feel that I'm getting nearer a working AB - having got past Geronimo 
build and deployment trouble brings me nearer to my usual (J2EE 
application) domain :-)


Whoohooo! I had lots of work the past week and couldn't spend much time 
on it. Thanks for taking it over during that time (but please attach 
your work to the JIRA issue as soon as possible).


To make best use of our time, maybe we should let me have a try at the 
application specific things?


What do you mean? Let's talk it over.

I haven't yet succeeden in having the maven script unpack a new server 
automatically, and the startup procedure I'm managed to get working is 
very clumsy. Maybe you could look into these issues some time? If you 
want it, I could distribute the diff on my sandbox/adventurebuilder 
directory now - if you don't need it, I'll wait until the application is 
 working.


If you could publish your changes by attaching a patch to the JIRA 
issue, it would be the best way to go on (and hopefully invite others to 
contribute). I'll be committing my changes later today.


Thanks again for your hard work. Keep it going (chances are we'll have 
finished before 1.0 is out).



Jakob


Jacek


Re: Java Adventure Builder Reference application, status

2005-12-14 Thread Jakob Færch (Trifork)

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
At last I could build the latest version of Geronimo. It wasn't that 
easy as it should be. I remember having to run maven several times 
before all jars were in place and the build finished with no errors.


I'm looking into getting AB up and running in it.


My status is that I have AB deploying without errors on the (broken) 
1.0-prebuild.


Compared to the plans/sql in the repository, so far I have:
- Set up (more) correct references to web services
- Added undefined web service endpoints
- Started to get the autogenerated primary keys for CMP's working
  (using your work from the Pet Store as template)

I feel that I'm getting nearer a working AB - having got past Geronimo 
build and deployment trouble brings me nearer to my usual (J2EE 
application) domain :-)


To make best use of our time, maybe we should let me have a try at the 
application specific things?


I haven't yet succeeden in having the maven script unpack a new server 
automatically, and the startup procedure I'm managed to get working is 
very clumsy. Maybe you could look into these issues some time? If you 
want it, I could distribute the diff on my sandbox/adventurebuilder 
directory now - if you don't need it, I'll wait until the application is 
 working.


Jakob