Re: [SailfishDevel] Sailfish SDK 3.2 has been released to Early Access

2020-08-04 Thread Oskar Roesler via Devel
An idea to solve the forum - mailing list issue: What about a forum bot
that interacts with the mailing list if tagged? If you like it, do you
think it should be bidirectional or nott?

Am 04.08.20 um 20:08 schrieb VWrestle:
> Hello,
>
> I agree with what Eli has just stated
> I hope the Sailfish will eventually be the goto mobile OS platform for
> alternatives to IOS and Android.
>
> Hoping for the best of Sailfish,
>
> -Warren
>
> On August 4, 2020 10:29:53 AM PDT, "E.S. Rosenberg"
>  wrote:
>
>
>
> Op ma 3 aug. 2020 om 09:22 schreef Martin Kampas
> mailto:martin.kam...@jolla.com>>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> > Am I correct in understanding that the mailing list is being
> shut down?
>
>
> Yes, see
> https://blog.jolla.com/new-forum-for-sailfish-os-discussion/ .
>
> No offense but shouldn't such a move be announced on the mailing
> list too instead of just in a blog post? Especially a blogpost
> about a subject that a part of the mailing list user may find
> irrelevant to their lives (a forum) and thus not read.
>
>
> > Also does a normal forum also mean we now get a normal bug
> tracker?
>
>
> This question is too general for a quick answer I am afraid.
> Maybe you can answer yourself after checking the activity in
> the Bug Reports category
> https://forum.sailfishos.org/c/bug-reports/13 .
>
> This is not a bug tracker, this is yet another non-transparent way
> for us to report bugs and pray that maybe someone at Jolla notices
> and maybe not and never know if and what is being done about it.
> A true bugtracker would be either any of the myriad of dedicated
> pieces of software (which you undoubtedly do use internally) or an
> issue tracker on a git{hub|lab} repository or something similar.
>
> Sorry for the flame but I care strongly for Jolla and SFOS (have
> been a user since the n900) and the behavior of Jolla Oy over the
> past years has been very far sub optimal, something upon which
> other ecosystems try to profit by approaching community members.
>
> Anyhow I hope this new forum brings goodness and do suggest to
> reconsider this "no more mailing list" policy (although if I'm not
> mistaken discuss [the forum platform] allows mailing list like
> behavior).
>
> BR,
> Eli
>
>
> BR,
>
> Martin
>
> ___
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to
> devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
> 
>
>
> -- 
> Sent from my Gemini PDA with the Airmail® app. Please excuse my
> verboseness - I have a great keyboard and just cannot resist. Get a
> Gemini PDA from Planet and type on the move! www.planetcom.co.uk
>
> ___
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org

Re: [SailfishDevel] SDK SIGSEGV when adding new kit

2020-04-20 Thread Oskar Roesler via Devel
It's a known bug which is already fixed in the git repo.
https://github.com/sailfishos/sailfish-qtcreator/issues/263

Am 20.04.20 um 16:45 schrieb Matthias Fehring:
> Ah, forgot to describe my environment:
>
> SailfishOS SDK 3.0.7
> openSUSE Tumbleweed 64 bit
> Linux 5.6.4
> glibc 2.31
>
> Best regards
> Matthias
>
> Am Montag, 20. April 2020, 16:43:05 CEST schrieb Matthias Fehring:
>> Hello,
>>
>> maybe someone can confirm this: When I try to add a new Kit in the SDK,
>> qtcreator crashes with a segmentation fault.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Matthias
>
> ___
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org

[SailfishDevel] Problems with qmllivebench

2020-04-14 Thread Oskar Roesler via Devel
Hi,


I wanted to try qmllivebench, but sadly it always tells me the emulator
host is offline, even though nmap says port 10234 is open. What did I wrong?


Regards,

Oskar




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org

Re: [SailfishDevel] Fwd: [python/qml] packaging issues

2019-07-11 Thread Oskar Roesler via Devel

Am 11.07.19 um 20:59 schrieb E.S. Rosenberg:
>
>
> Op do 11 jul. 2019 om 21:51 schreef Oskar Roesler via Devel
> mailto:devel@lists.sailfishos.org>>:
>
> Am 11.07.19 um 20:43 schrieb E.S. Rosenberg:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm trying to build the gpodder package with the SDK and am
>> experiencing 2 issues that I haven't managed to solve yet.
>> 1. The package that gets built includes python bytecode files
>> (*.pyc and *.pyo)
>> 2. The package is architecture specific instead of "noarch"
>>
> As said in IRC, you have to specify this in the .spec file.
>
> Thanks, IRC was running on my aptop so I missed that :)
> I'll continue to monitor there for now.
>
>> I took the original gpodder and I added a .pro file so that the
>> SDK can work with it and removed the rpm spec file which the SDK
>> wants to autogenerate based on the .pro and the .yaml files as
>> far as I understand.
> If gpodder is a cmake-based project, you should can/should use
> .spec directly.
>
> I'm trying to make gpodder-sailfish build from the SDK, until now it
> was being built by SSH'ing into the buildenv and manually building,
> though that of course works I feel that it is a significant barrier to
> convenient and quick development.
Many projects work like that, cause not everyone likes QtCreator. And of
course, if you don't want qmake, you're forced to do that. In the end,
it's up to you.
> Strictly speaking it doesn't need any form of make, just a bunch of cp
> commands to copy the right files to the right locations.
>
>>
>> Any help on how to fix the two above issues would be welcome.
>>
>> Also does harbour accept mpris now or does the fact that the SDK
>> screams about that mean I have no chance of updating?
> Harbour still doesn't allow mpris.
>
> :/ Oh well openrepos it is then.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>>
>> ___
>> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
>> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to 
>> devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org 
>> <mailto:devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org>
> ___
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to
> devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
> <mailto:devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org>
>


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org

[SailfishDevel] Fwd: [python/qml] packaging issues

2019-07-11 Thread Oskar Roesler via Devel
Am 11.07.19 um 20:43 schrieb E.S. Rosenberg:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to build the gpodder package with the SDK and am
> experiencing 2 issues that I haven't managed to solve yet.
> 1. The package that gets built includes python bytecode files (*.pyc
> and *.pyo)
> 2. The package is architecture specific instead of "noarch"
>
As said in IRC, you have to specify this in the .spec file.
> I took the original gpodder and I added a .pro file so that the SDK
> can work with it and removed the rpm spec file which the SDK wants to
> autogenerate based on the .pro and the .yaml files as far as I understand.
If gpodder is a cmake-based project, you should can/should use .spec
directly.
>
> Any help on how to fix the two above issues would be welcome.
>
> Also does harbour accept mpris now or does the fact that the SDK
> screams about that mean I have no chance of updating?
Harbour still doesn't allow mpris.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>
> ___
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org

[SailfishDevel] Wiki page for writing .spec files

2019-05-31 Thread Oskar Roesler via Devel
Hello, are there anywhere instructions how to write a .spec file for
SFOS or do I have to use the ones from CentOS? Regards, Oskar



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org