Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] RS232 xcvr control when serial ports are occupied

2018-07-15 Thread Stephen Rector via Elecraft
I'm following up here with the verified solution to my issue.

To recap - When I used a KXSER cable to connect my KXPA/KX3 to my Ciro Mazzoni 
Magloop antenna controller, that left no port available for me to control the 
KX3 with RS232 using the program FLRig. The best solution I found was to use a 
DB9 Y-connector in conjunction with a breakout board for the DB9 branch going 
to the antenna controller. On that board, I patched only the RXD and ground 
lines: pins 2 and 5, from input to output.

With this configuration, the Antenna controller has its TXD pin left 
unconnected. As many here noted, this is of necessity since only one TXD driver 
can exist on a common TXD line. So, for the controller to work, FLRig must be 
running and connected to the radio. Since FLRig polls the KX3 control 
parameters, the Antenna controller receives the VFO data it needs on its RXD 
line. Apparently it doesn't matter that the controller is not doing the 
polling, as long as something else is.

If I wanted to return polling autonomy to the antenna controller, I would have 
to disconnect the Y-junction. But I think I will keep things in place. Just 
because FLRig is running on the computer, doesn't mean that I can't use the KX3 
standalone as I usually have in the past. So this is an acceptable solution. 
I'll probably post it on Ciro Mazzoni's user site for others' benefit.

Thanks all for the help and pointers!

73,

Steve, NU7B


> On Jul 8, 2018, at 5:07 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
> 
> Sorry about the pin typo.  Look at the cable link for the steppIR that Dick 
> K6KR sent and that will be obvious.  I was looking at that diagram when I 
> typed my response, but did not proof it.
> TXD is really pin 3.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> On 7/8/2018 7:24 PM, Stephen Rector wrote:
>> Don:
>> I tried a 3.5mm Y-connector at the KXPA and this did not work. But based on 
>> your feedback and also that of N6TV, I see that I have multiple TX drivers 
>> on the TXD line. Even if there is no TX from the antenna controller, the 
>> low-impedance of its TXD driver will load the line. Bob also thinks the 
>> controller may be polling for info, much like the program FLRIG does. One 
>> correction to your info Don, I think TXD is pin 3 on the DB-9, and not pin 2.
>> The KXSER cable DB9 shell appears to be molded - it's not obvious how to 
>> disassemble it. So I will need to go into the controller to disconnect TXD 
>> there. I'll report back on whether or not that works, next weekend.
>> 73,
>> Steve, NU7B
>>> On Jul 8, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>>> 
>>> Steve,
>>> 
>>> Yes, since you are using both the KXUSB and the KXSER cables, a "Y" at the 
>>> KXPA100 would serve you well.
>>> If your magloop controller also attempts to transmit, you can remove the 
>>> connection to pin 2 on the DE9 end of the KXSER cable (just remove the 
>>> backshell and disconnect the wire).
>>> 
>>> RS-232 multiplexors are complicated devices and require the use of the full 
>>> RS-232 bus (mainly DTR and CTS signals) to handle the handshaking signals.  
>>> The 3 conductor KX3/KXPA100 wiring will not provide the proper handshaking 
>>> signals.
>>> The handshaking signals are not provided from the data stream (as they are 
>>> in Ethernet and other communications protocols), but from the explicit 
>>> signals separate from TXD and RTS.
>>> 
>>> Note that the KX3 (and most other Elecraft products) rely only on TXD and 
>>> RTS, which are reserved for data transmission only in the RS-232 scheme of 
>>> things.
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> Don W3FPR
>>> 
>>> On 7/8/2018 4:56 PM, Stephen Rector wrote:
>>>> Hi Don:
>>>> Yes - it occurred to me after sending the post that I might be able to 
>>>> create the split at the KXPA with a stereo Y-cable/connector. I am using a 
>>>> KXUSB to the computer, with a KXSER cable going from the the antenna 
>>>> controller to the KXPA. It is the KXUSB that presently has no place to 
>>>> connect to.
>>>> So - I think I can try a 3.5mm stereo y-junction at the KXPA. Hopefully 
>>>> impedances won't be an issue at 38400 baud...
>>>> I did look for RS232 multiplexers - they seem to exist for industrial 
>>>> applications. The documentation seemed to be sparse on the web.
>>>> Anyway - thanks for the pointer :)
>>>> 73,
>>>> Steve NU7B
>>>>> On Jul 8, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Steve,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you using the KXUSB to connect with the 

Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] RS232 xcvr control when serial ports are occupied

2018-07-08 Thread Stephen Rector via Elecraft
Don:

I tried a 3.5mm Y-connector at the KXPA and this did not work. But based on 
your feedback and also that of N6TV, I see that I have multiple TX drivers on 
the TXD line. Even if there is no TX from the antenna controller, the 
low-impedance of its TXD driver will load the line. Bob also thinks the 
controller may be polling for info, much like the program FLRIG does. One 
correction to your info Don, I think TXD is pin 3 on the DB-9, and not pin 2.

The KXSER cable DB9 shell appears to be molded - it's not obvious how to 
disassemble it. So I will need to go into the controller to disconnect TXD 
there. I'll report back on whether or not that works, next weekend.

73,

Steve, NU7B


> On Jul 8, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
> 
> Steve,
> 
> Yes, since you are using both the KXUSB and the KXSER cables, a "Y" at the 
> KXPA100 would serve you well.
> If your magloop controller also attempts to transmit, you can remove the 
> connection to pin 2 on the DE9 end of the KXSER cable (just remove the 
> backshell and disconnect the wire).
> 
> RS-232 multiplexors are complicated devices and require the use of the full 
> RS-232 bus (mainly DTR and CTS signals) to handle the handshaking signals.  
> The 3 conductor KX3/KXPA100 wiring will not provide the proper handshaking 
> signals.
> The handshaking signals are not provided from the data stream (as they are in 
> Ethernet and other communications protocols), but from the explicit signals 
> separate from TXD and RTS.
> 
> Note that the KX3 (and most other Elecraft products) rely only on TXD and 
> RTS, which are reserved for data transmission only in the RS-232 scheme of 
> things.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> On 7/8/2018 4:56 PM, Stephen Rector wrote:
>> Hi Don:
>> Yes - it occurred to me after sending the post that I might be able to 
>> create the split at the KXPA with a stereo Y-cable/connector. I am using a 
>> KXUSB to the computer, with a KXSER cable going from the the antenna 
>> controller to the KXPA. It is the KXUSB that presently has no place to 
>> connect to.
>> So - I think I can try a 3.5mm stereo y-junction at the KXPA. Hopefully 
>> impedances won't be an issue at 38400 baud...
>> I did look for RS232 multiplexers - they seem to exist for industrial 
>> applications. The documentation seemed to be sparse on the web.
>> Anyway - thanks for the pointer :)
>> 73,
>> Steve NU7B
>>> On Jul 8, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Steve,
>>> 
>>> Are you using the KXUSB to connect with the KXPA100/KX3, or are you using 
>>> the KXSER with a real computer serial port or a USB to serial adapter?
>>> 
>>> Since your magloop controller only 'sniffs', it means it should only listen 
>>> and never try to transmit on the RS-232 signal lines.  If it only listens, 
>>> there will be no collisons (RS-232 is not packet oriented, but an 
>>> asynchronous communications system).
>>> 
>>> If the magloop controller also transmits on the RS-232 bus, you will need 
>>> some external device to act as "traffic cop" - note that RS-232 is a point 
>>> to point system (unlike Ethernet and others) where there is one driver 
>>> device and one receiver at each end.
>>> 
>>> So yes, you can use a splitter - one with a 3.5mm stereo plug and two 3.5mm 
>>> stereo jacks if using the KXUSB.
>>> If you are using the KXSER cable instead, yes, you can connect a "Y" DB9 
>>> splitter to the DB9 end of the KXSER cable - the computer connects to one 
>>> side and the magloop controller connects to the other side of the "Y".
>>> 
>>> On 7/8/2018 3:31 PM, Stephen Rector via Elecraft wrote:
>>>> Hy home station is a KX3 + KPXA100, and I can control the radio via the 
>>>> RS232 port on the KXPA. However, recently I added a Ciro Mazzoni magloop 
>>>> to the station, and its controller plugs in to the KXPA serial port to 
>>>> sniff for frequency information, allowing re-tuning on the fly. This 
>>>> leaves no RS232 port left for remote control of the radio.
>>>> How do I modify this arrangement to add an extra serial port for KX3 
>>>> control? My first thought is that, since the antenna controller just 
>>>> sniffs for data, I could add a DB-9 Y-cable to provide the extra port at 
>>>> the controller serial port location. However, packets could still collide 
>>>> ...does the protocol handle this? Is there some sort of multiplexer 
>>>> available?

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] RS232 xcvr control when serial ports are occupied

2018-07-08 Thread Stephen Rector via Elecraft
Hi Dick:

Thanks - the diagram makes things very clear. I initially didn't think of 
accomplishing the split at the KXPA 3.5mm connector, but it makes sense.

Thanks,  73,

Steve NU7B


> On Jul 8, 2018, at 1:38 PM, d...@elecraft.com wrote:
> 
> Typically "sniffers" don't have the TX side connected.  RS-232 can't have
> multiple transmitters on either wire.
> 
> This is done with SteppIR controller, for similar reasons.  SteppIR
> describes a splitter cable for DE-9 connectors. The same principle (with a
> much simpler cable, just tip and ring) applies to the 3.5mm connector to the
> KXPA100.
> 
> http://www.steppir.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Y-Cable.pdf
> 
> 73 de Dick, K6KR
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net  On
> Behalf Of Stephen Rector via Elecraft
> Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:31
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] [KX3] RS232 xcvr control when serial ports are occupied
> 
> Hy home station is a KX3 + KPXA100, and I can control the radio via the
> RS232 port on the KXPA. However, recently I added a Ciro Mazzoni magloop to
> the station, and its controller plugs in to the KXPA serial port to sniff
> for frequency information, allowing re-tuning on the fly. This leaves no
> RS232 port left for remote control of the radio.
> 
> How do I modify this arrangement to add an extra serial port for KX3
> control? My first thought is that, since the antenna controller just sniffs
> for data, I could add a DB-9 Y-cable to provide the extra port at the
> controller serial port location. However, packets could still collide
> ...does the protocol handle this? Is there some sort of multiplexer
> available?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 
> NU7B
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
> delivered to d...@elecraft.com
> 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] RS232 xcvr control when serial ports are occupied

2018-07-08 Thread Stephen Rector via Elecraft
Hi Don:

Yes - it occurred to me after sending the post that I might be able to create 
the split at the KXPA with a stereo Y-cable/connector. I am using a KXUSB to 
the computer, with a KXSER cable going from the the antenna controller to the 
KXPA. It is the KXUSB that presently has no place to connect to.

So - I think I can try a 3.5mm stereo y-junction at the KXPA. Hopefully 
impedances won't be an issue at 38400 baud...

I did look for RS232 multiplexers - they seem to exist for industrial 
applications. The documentation seemed to be sparse on the web.

Anyway - thanks for the pointer :)

73,

Steve NU7B


> On Jul 8, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
> 
> Steve,
> 
> Are you using the KXUSB to connect with the KXPA100/KX3, or are you using the 
> KXSER with a real computer serial port or a USB to serial adapter?
> 
> Since your magloop controller only 'sniffs', it means it should only listen 
> and never try to transmit on the RS-232 signal lines.  If it only listens, 
> there will be no collisons (RS-232 is not packet oriented, but an 
> asynchronous communications system).
> 
> If the magloop controller also transmits on the RS-232 bus, you will need 
> some external device to act as "traffic cop" - note that RS-232 is a point to 
> point system (unlike Ethernet and others) where there is one driver device 
> and one receiver at each end.
> 
> So yes, you can use a splitter - one with a 3.5mm stereo plug and two 3.5mm 
> stereo jacks if using the KXUSB.
> If you are using the KXSER cable instead, yes, you can connect a "Y" DB9 
> splitter to the DB9 end of the KXSER cable - the computer connects to one 
> side and the magloop controller connects to the other side of the "Y".
> 
> On 7/8/2018 3:31 PM, Stephen Rector via Elecraft wrote:
>> Hy home station is a KX3 + KPXA100, and I can control the radio via the 
>> RS232 port on the KXPA. However, recently I added a Ciro Mazzoni magloop to 
>> the station, and its controller plugs in to the KXPA serial port to sniff 
>> for frequency information, allowing re-tuning on the fly. This leaves no 
>> RS232 port left for remote control of the radio.
>> How do I modify this arrangement to add an extra serial port for KX3 
>> control? My first thought is that, since the antenna controller just sniffs 
>> for data, I could add a DB-9 Y-cable to provide the extra port at the 
>> controller serial port location. However, packets could still collide 
>> ...does the protocol handle this? Is there some sort of multiplexer 
>> available?

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] [KX3] RS232 xcvr control when serial ports are occupied

2018-07-08 Thread Stephen Rector via Elecraft
Hy home station is a KX3 + KPXA100, and I can control the radio via the RS232 
port on the KXPA. However, recently I added a Ciro Mazzoni magloop to the 
station, and its controller plugs in to the KXPA serial port to sniff for 
frequency information, allowing re-tuning on the fly. This leaves no RS232 port 
left for remote control of the radio.

How do I modify this arrangement to add an extra serial port for KX3 control? 
My first thought is that, since the antenna controller just sniffs for data, I 
could add a DB-9 Y-cable to provide the extra port at the controller serial 
port location. However, packets could still collide ...does the protocol handle 
this? Is there some sort of multiplexer available?

Thanks,

Steve

NU7B 
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] KX3 #1690 observations

2012-09-16 Thread Stephen Rector
Hi All:

I received my KX3 s/n 1690 about 10 days ago and have been putting it to work 
on many modes. It's got best receiver I've ever used, although the highest end 
xcvr I've owned previous to it was a TS850 with narrow filters - not quite 
high-end compared to the $5K radios on today's market. But I expected it to be 
good given Elecrafts work on the K3 - and I have been very pleased so far.

I can see two areas where a tweak might be beneficial. With weak signals or 
QRN, I spend a lot of time using a CW passband of 150 or 100 Hz. It would be 
nice if the PBW control switched from 50 Hz steps to 10 or 20 Hz increments 
below 150-200 Hz - these would allow a finer adjust on close-in interferers 
while minimizing the need to go to 50 Hz passband with its higher PB center 
attenuation.

The other area is maybe unique to HF digital mode operators. Since I'm QRP with 
the KX3, I use Olivia because of it's advantage as a weak-signal mode. With the 
KX3, I find that during a 3-5 minute transmission, the PA starts its HI-TEMP 
foldback at anything above the 3.0W setting. For this mode, the modest heatsink 
on the KX3 is insufficient - the plate is not terribly well thermally coupled 
to the devices - nor does it have much thermal mass. I could make something 
ugly with a piece of 3/16 in copper stock that I have using a 4-40 tap for 
threads - but I wonder if Elecraft could offer a heatsink upgrade for data mode 
users. I haven't tried heat sink compound on the FETs, but I still thing the 
heatsink could benefit from more thermal mass. Backpackers may not want the 
extra few ounces - so an option approach might work best.

I wonder how other data users deal with this - a muffin fan would help I 
imagine.

In summary, I am 90% delighted with the KX3. I cant wait for the amplifier to 
be announced - I really need the boots in my deed-restricted neighborhood. Is 
there a general timeframe this is expected to be announced / orders taken? I'd 
rather not get the Tentec 418 because the integration to the KX3 won't be as 
good and there's no internal tuner. Did manage to get NH8S on two bands QRP 
though...

Steve, NU7B

KX3 #1690
K2 #6770  / KPA100 / KAT100 / KSB2 etc.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Devices for upcoming KX3 PA

2012-08-12 Thread Stephen Rector
I've got a KX3 on order, with the idea of replacing my K2-100 as the primary 
radio at home. So, the PA is something I'll be watching for.

I wonder what Wayne and others think about using push-pull mosfet finals as 
opposed to the BJT used in the K2-100 PA. Mosfets are almost universally used 
in PA designs with Vcc  24V, and have become common at 12V. I haven't recently 
designed a PA, but I assume there is some advantage in 3rd-order IM with 
devices that are roughly square-law, although this may be offset by greater 
difficulty in the match to the device. I assume the KX3 PA will have 12V Vcc.

Steve NU7B
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2 modification of the variable BW Cohn CW crystal filter

2011-07-17 Thread Stephen Rector
I ve been using me K2 (s/n 6770) in the digital modes lately and have wanted to 
make an improvement in the passband ripple, which is almost 10 dB p-p when the 
BW is set at 2 KHz, with the RX audio viewed spectrally. So I simulated the 
filter using the crystal parameters given here:  
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/QEX_Next_Issue/Nov-Dec_2009/QEX_Nov-Dec_09_Feature.pdf
 , using the spice simulator Qucs at http://qucs.sourceforge.net . The 
simulation agrees with the measured passband when I set the termination 
impedances between 200-300 ohms, with the ripple being more pronounced as the 
impedance is lowered.

I found a reference on the web to a modification of the Cohn filter which 
preserves the equal capacitances and crystal parameters for all elements, 
documented by G3UUR and described (page 5) here:  
http://www.warc.org.uk/filestore/projects/xtal_bpf_203/eDishalHelp.pdf . I 
haven't gone into the mathematics of this alteration, but the effect of placing 
a crystal in parallel with X7 and X11 is a de-Q-ing of these two elements and 
substantial reduction of ripple at the passband edges. This effect is 
apparently not unknown to Wayne, who uses it in the BFO resonator and 
considered it for increasing the pullability of the PLL reference. I don't have 
the 2010 ARRL Handbook, but G3UUR has an article in it describing his 
modification of the Cohn ladder response.

So - the mod I tried in simulation was to place a crystal in parallel with X7 
and X11, and to replace the coupling varicaps D29 and D34 with 4700pF fixed 
caps. The varicaps D30-33 are untouched. My simulation results:


K2 design:
With Cvc = 44pF:

6dB BW = 2.07 KHz, 60 dB BW = 4.55 KHz, ripple = 9 dB p-p, shape factor = 2.2.

With Cvc = 200 pF:

6dB BW = 0.57 KHz, 60 dB BW = 1.52 KHz, ripple = 1.5 dB p-p, shape factor = 
2.67.

Modified K2 design, G3UUR topology:
With Cvc = 56pF:

6dB BW = 2.03 KHz, 60 dB BW = 5.31 KHz, ripple = 3 dB p-p, shape factor = 2.61.

With Cvc = 205 pF:

6dB BW = 0.57 KHz, 60 dB BW = 1.96 KHz, ripple = 0.5 dB p-p, shape factor = 
3.50.

So it looks like I get a substantial reduction in passband ripple and a flatter 
group delay with the modification, at the cost of a bit of increase in the 
shape factor. If I used the K2 strictly for CW or psk31, I might not want to 
make a change. But I use wider digital modes like Olivia where group delay 
distortion can make a difference in BER. So I think I'm going to try the mod. 
Don has suggested in the past to narrow down the passband when using the 
digital modes, but this makes enough of a difference above 1 KHz BW (and I see 
surrounding signals in the waterfall), that this mod is worth a try. I'm 
curious if anyone on the list has considered it.

Steve NU7B
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] MH2 Mic issue

2009-07-26 Thread Stephen Rector
Hi All:

I'm new to this list. As of last week, my K2 s/n 6770 is up and  
running - I'm quite happy with it. Even though I have a stealth sloper  
to a pine tree (HOA restriction), the receiver has impressed me, and  
the QRP gets out (next weekend's board is the 100W PA). This weekend I  
got three of the accessory boards installed pretty much without a  
hitch, except for a problem with the MH2 hand mic.

The KSSB2 board seems fully functional and I get good reports on  
transmit audio when I use a Heil HM-10 with the K2. But when I plug in  
the new MH2 hand mic, the T/R keys but with zero audio: no ALC  
indication and no RF. Is there a measurement I can make on the MH2  
before sending it back? (I wired in the 5.6K resistor from pins 2-6  
per the instructions)

Steve NU7B
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2 CAL_FIL and the BFO

2009-07-26 Thread Stephen Rector
I'm new to the list, with a couple of questions on the K2. My s/n 6770  
has been running for about a week: this weekend put in the KSSB2,  
KDSP2 and KNB2. When I select from the four CW xtal filter bandwidths,  
I get a slightly different pitch on the received CW station.

Qusetion 1: Is that pitch change directly due to the offset I have  
dialed in during the filter calibration?

The circuit changes the bandwidth of the Cohn crystal filter and, at  
the same time, I dial in an offset to center that new passband to my  
desired pitch. So, I'm confused why the pitch changes - maybe it's  
just calibration error because the tuning step is coarser than my ear.

Question 2 is an observation: CW mode is LSB all the way to 17 meters,  
then USB from 15M up. This is normal, right? On previous  
(upconverting) radios it's always been USB from 20M up, so this  
surprised me.

Thanks for any help with these...

73,

Steve NU7B
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 CAL_FIL and the BFO

2009-07-26 Thread Stephen Rector
Hi Don:

I will check your article out, and thanks again. Last I checked today,  
the pitch change was slight, so I'll keep an ear on it. And I'll try  
Spectrogram at some point, after the construction is done. Still have  
the PA and KAT-100 to go It's nice to have the knowledge base that  
you and others are willing to share.

Cheers,

Steve

On Jul 26, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

 Steve,

 There may be a slight change in the pitch of the received signal  
 when changing filters, but it should be limited to 20 Hz or less.   
 If it is more than that, you will have to do a good filter  
 alignment.  I recommemd using Spectrogram and a noise generator so  
 you can see what you are doing, but lacking the wideband noise  
 generator, the same thing can be accomplished with band noise.  See  
 my website www.w3fpr.com article on K2 Dial Calibration for more  
 information.  Part 3 of that article deals with aligning the filters  
 (adjust the BFO frequency to shift the passband), and has links to  
 help setting up and using Spectrogram.  Even though the latest  
 version of Spectrogram is now freeware, I recommend you use version  
 5.17 (download from Tom Hammond's website www.n0ss.net) because the  
 'how-to' information is written for that version - the screenshots  
 may differ for other versions (but are similar).

 Yes, the K2 places the VCO on the high frequency side of the signal  
 frequency for bands up through 17 meters, but at 15 meters and  
 above, the VFO is on the low side - that is what causes the sideband  
 inversion.  If you prefer to listen to CW in LSB for all the bands,  
 then switch to CW reverse for 15, 12 and 10 meters.

 Stephen Rector wrote:
 I'm new to the list, with a couple of questions on the K2. My s/n  
 6770  has been running for about a week: this weekend put in the  
 KSSB2,  KDSP2 and KNB2. When I select from the four CW xtal filter  
 bandwidths,  I get a slightly different pitch on the received CW  
 station.

 Qusetion 1: Is that pitch change directly due to the offset I have   
 dialed in during the filter calibration?

 The circuit changes the bandwidth of the Cohn crystal filter and,  
 at  the same time, I dial in an offset to center that new passband  
 to my  desired pitch. So, I'm confused why the pitch changes -  
 maybe it's  just calibration error because the tuning step is  
 coarser than my ear.

 Question 2 is an observation: CW mode is LSB all the way to 17  
 meters,  then USB from 15M up. This is normal, right? On previous   
 (upconverting) radios it's always been USB from 20M up, so this   
 surprised me.

 Thanks for any help with these...

 73,

 Steve NU7B
 __

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Fwd: MH2 Mic issue

2009-07-26 Thread Stephen Rector


Begin forwarded message:

 From: Stephen Rector azstef...@mac.com
 Date: July 26, 2009 5:26:51 PM GMT-07:00
 To: d...@w3fpr.com
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] MH2 Mic issue
 Message-Id: 32086425-1687-4f48-8559-b91c3895b...@mac.com
 In-Reply-To: 4a6cee8d.2070...@w3fpr.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
 X-Smtp-Server: smtp.mac.com:azstefano
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
 References: c4b523e9-4d50-484c-97c9-0586bbae3...@mac.com 
 4a6ce6f0.7050...@embarqmail.com 
  321a9bcf-9ede-42b6-b4b3-09c9fe59a...@mac.com 4a6cee8d.2070...@w3fpr.com 
 

 Hi Don:

 I did it the more painful way - pulling out the front now means  
 removing the DSP boards... I'll remember the side panel suggestion...

 Anyway - problem solved, and the HM-10 doesn't mind the DC on the AF  
 line, so both mics are working.

 Thanks for that almost instant help. Nice to see such an active  
 list. I've been inactive ham for almost 10 years, but now hv excuse  
 to spend some more time on the air as the next sunspot cycle builds  
 steam.

 Thanks,

 Steve NU7B


 On Jul 26, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

 Steve,

 You can get access to the back of the mic jack by removing the left  
 side panel - enough clearance to change the end of the resistor  
 from pin 2 to pin 1.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 Stephen Rector wrote:
 Oy - that would explain it. I'll check that right now. maybe a  
 cerebral typo

 Tnx,

 Steve


 On Jul 26, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

 Steve,

 Re-check those instructions for the MH2.  The resistor goes  
 between pins 1 and 6.  Pin 1 is the AF line, and pin 6 is the 5  
 volt line.  You must pipe voltage to the AF line on the mike  
 (through the resistor) to make it produce audio.

 BTW, pin 2 is the PTT pin.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 Stephen Rector wrote:
 Hi All:

 I'm new to this list. As of last week, my K2 s/n 6770 is up and   
 running - I'm quite happy with it. Even though I have a stealth  
 sloper  to a pine tree (HOA restriction), the receiver has  
 impressed me, and  the QRP gets out (next weekend's board is the  
 100W PA). This weekend I  got three of the accessory boards  
 installed pretty much without a  hitch, except for a problem  
 with the MH2 hand mic.

 The KSSB2 board seems fully functional and I get good reports  
 on  transmit audio when I use a Heil HM-10 with the K2. But when  
 I plug in  the new MH2 hand mic, the T/R keys but with zero  
 audio: no ALC  indication and no RF. Is there a measurement I  
 can make on the MH2  before sending it back? (I wired in the  
 5.6K resistor from pins 2-6  per the instructions)

 Steve NU7B
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/ 
 donate.html
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database:  
 270.13.31/2264 - Release Date: 07/26/09 11:07:00


 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database:  
 270.13.31/2264 - Release Date: 07/26/09 11:07:00




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html