RE: Calendar Entries after 2002

[Erik Sojka]

We added the following lines to our logon scripts (it is a reg value that
needs to be changed):

%0\..\REG ADD HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences /v
FBPublishRange /t REG_DWORD /d 0x000c  /f
%0\..\REG ADD HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences /v
FBUpdateSecs /t REG_DWORD /d 0x0384  /f

(wrappage, etc & value may need to be tweaked for Outlook versions other
than 2K) 
PublishRange is the number of months in hexadecimal (c=12 months) and
UpdateSecs is the number of seconds between updates (hexadecimal).

For accounts where no one logs in (like a conference room), you will need to
log into NT under that account, and manually set those options via the
Outlook GUI.


*
* Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
* Manager, Network Services *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:45 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Calendar Entries after 2002
> 
> 
> Bingo! Thanks Steve, it was defaulted at 2 months. Which 
> brings me neatly to question 2: Is there any way of changing 
> that setting for all users, either by SMS'ing a new config 
> settings out, or through Ex Admin? With 2500 users I'd rather 
> not have to change them individually...
> 
> Tim
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 November 2001 12:45
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Calendar Entries after 2002
> 
> 
> Check the client's free/busy - normally it is only published 
> for 6 months. Not sure if that would generate an error but 
> something that might be interesting to research.
> 
>  Steve Clark
> Clark Systems Support, LLC
> AVIEN Charter Member
> "Who's watching your network?"
> www.clarksupport.com
>   301-610-9584 voice
>   240-465-0323 Efax
>  
> The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed 
> by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and 
> privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for 
> the benefit of others without the prior written permission of 
> Clark Systems Support, LLC.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:40 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Calendar Entries after 2002
> 
> Here's a teaser...
> Our users can't access their colleagues calendar information 
> in 2002. When they attempt to arrange a meeting, they receive 
> an errmsg that there is no information available for other 
> attendees. Does anyone have any thoughts on what could be 
> causing this? 
> 
> Running NT4/SP6 with OL2K clients(Mostly SR1, but varies from 
> box to box) and EX55/SP4 on NT4/SP6
> 
> Tim Boswell
> Fujitsu/ICL
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-> software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ 
> at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-> software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: concurrent CAL for exchange?

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Exchange CALs are tied to each mailbox that gets 
created.
 
100 
users = 100 mailboxes = 100 CALs required.
 
Don't 
base your decisions on what I say, however.  Talk to your reseller or check 
the site below:
 
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/howtobuy/default.asp
 
 

** Erik 
Sojka, MOS, MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
** 

  
  -Original Message-From: Allan Muchmore 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:34 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: concurrent CAL 
  for exchange?
  With Exchange 
  2000, can I purchase CAL's for concurrent users only?
   
  I have a potential 
  client who is looking at setting up an Exchange server that will only 
  be accessed remotely, through a VPN and/or OWA.  Looking at close to 100 
  users, but they would only synchronize periodically.  Probably no more 
  than 2 connected at once, and safe to say it would always less than 
  half a dozen.
   
  Can we purchase a 
  half-dozen Exchange licenses, plus a half dozen Windows Server 
  licenses?
   
  
  I'm hoping that a 
  message here can save me hours of pouring over licensing 
  jargon.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

[Erik Sojka]

More:

4) Bill Gates and Larry Ellison both wash floors for a living.
5) They're both swell lookers.
6) Neither one of them is Chinese.

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:02 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
> 
> 
> I found some similarities:
> 
> 1) They both cost more than sendmail
> 2) Neither will run on Novell
> 3) They both will require competent administrators to function well
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:32 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and
> exchange alike one is an email system and the other is
> a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp
> gateway.
> Chris
> --- Allen Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I
> > thought this article was
> > a little off-base.  Ellison claims that an Exchange
> > Server can only handle
> > 250-500 Outlook users.  Seems like a lot of his
> > numbers are exaggerated to
> > me.  Thought others might find this interesting if
> > you haven't already read
> > it.
> > 
> >
> http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Offline address book not available

[Erik Sojka]

Do you have multiple containers under your "Recipients" container?  The
offline AB will only allow you to sync one container at a time.

> -Original Message-
> From: Tianhong Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:07 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Offline address book not available
> 
> 
> 
> Server: Exchange 2000+SP1
> client: Outlook 2000.
> 
> The client is setup to be able work offline. Everything is OK, except
> when I try to download the offline address book, there is no 
> any address
> book in the drop down list. I check the Exchange server, 
> offline address
> list is here. What's wrong?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tianhong
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: CA becoming more responsive

[Erik Sojka]

LOL!

Me:
"Hello, Tech Support?  I installed ArcServe on my Exchange box and now it
has a Blue Screen of Death on it."

Chandler Vhing:
"Could your box be any more f*cked?"

> -Original Message-
> From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: CA becoming more responsive
> 
> 
> Well, for what it is worth, I also got a call.  Not from a 
> techie or a VP,
> someone in Marketing.  I expressed similar concerns, 
> non-English speaking
> (writing) tech support, the fact that their solution to everything is
> "re-install", the wait time, etc.  What Christina told me was 
> that they are
> giving the Indian technicians English lessons (she actually 
> said, "we make them
> watch 'Friends'") and that she couldn't help me with my 
> technical problems but
> gave me the number for tech support (just a useless loop for 
> me and the Exchange
> agent for acrserve).  She was going to send me some contact 
> info via email but
> she said their email was down and didn't know when it would 
> be back up.  So, I
> wouldn't put much stock in the "New and Improved" CA.  Unless 
> you like the witty
> quips from 'Friends' as a response to your technical issues.
> Tiffany Ernest
> 
> "Sanborn, John" wrote:
> 
> > Having a VP calling does not say much other 'we have do 
> something to APPEAR
> > to be improving'.  Once the low-level techs start improving 
> then it would be
> > something worth looking into.  Otherwise, it's all so much 
> P.R. propaganda.
> >
> > John
> >
> >  -Original Message-
> > From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:23 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: CA becoming more responsive
> >
> > The fact that someone called you is impressive.  It's a big 
> maybe, though,
> > that we will go back to them.  But I think not.  Because of 
> their ARCServe
> > product, our disaster recovery became a running joke.  
> Being a Financial
> > Banking firm where down time can cost us as much as $1 
> million bucks an
> > hour, I for one am not willing to wear my career on my sleeve or the
> > viability of a good Arcserve backup/recovery.
> >
> > Signed, burned once..
> >
> > Dot Harris
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:16 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: CA becoming more responsive
> >
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > Thought I'd share with you my notes on this (surprising) 
> new contact i just
> > had with the Computer Associates VP of Technical Support.  
> Though I had been
> > a vocal critic of CA's tech support in the past, even back 
> when I was an SE,
> > I thought I was a lightweight when it came to CA-bashing on 
> this list.  So I
> > was surprised when I got a call from their VP/TS, 
> especially since he was
> > calling from the east coast.
> >
> > Anyway, let me just hit the high points for you ...
> >
> > I told him my main complaints with CA products (ARCserve & 
> Inoculan) were
> > lack of real-time tech support, and the nightmare of RegIT. 
>  He agreed.
> > Here are a few of the things he told me:
> >
> > - CA has relaxed their registration code, so that now it 
> does not disable
> > the service.
> >
> > - They have beefed up their support staff, with an office 
> in India with 100
> > techies, and now 80%+ of their calls actually get answered 
> by a real tech
> > support person.  Wow!  I used to get the "take a number, 
> we'll call you back
> > someday" runaround.
> >
> > - Their knowledge base has been beefed up.  I recall it 
> used to be pretty
> > thin. I haven't checked it out yet.
> >
> > Well, I was impressed that a high-level guy from CA is 
> actually reaching out
> > to customers and people in the industry, and trying to respond to
> > criticisms.  Maybe they have turned over a new leaf.  I 
> won't have the
> > opportunity to really evaluate them as we are a Backup Exec 
> / Sophos /
> > Antigen shop, and being happy with these I'm not changing 
> horses ... but
> > maybe some of you out there will revisit CA products and 
> give them a fresh
> > chance.
> >
> > FWIW
> >
> > Bob Peitzke
> > Information Systems Manager
> > Sander A. Kessler & Associates
> > Santa Monica, CA, USA
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS01-57 install error

[Erik Sojka]

Well, Duh.  You need version number 2653.  ;)

Seriously; there was an update posted to the bulletin (now at v2.0 as of
12/7/01).  You need IE55SP2 or later for the patch to install.  Check the
latest version of the bulletin and verify you have all necessary components.


> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:49 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: MS01-57 install error
> 
> 
> Anyone have problems with the MS01-057 bulletin (OWA security leak)
> recently released from MS?  I tried installing this on my 
> IIS/OWA box and
> it errors out with "The system does not have version number 2653. 
> Instead, the version reported is . "
> 
> All I can do it click OK and the install exits.
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange

[Erik Sojka]

Interesting;  

What doesn't make sense specifically?  Other companies have multimaster
replication in their products for many many years but when MS develops it,
it is now an acceptible practice and AD is cool/Domino sucks?


> -Original Message-
> From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:47 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> 
> 
> Indeed.  When I was attempting to figure out replication on 
> Notes, it took a
>  moment for it to make 
> sense... as much
> sense as Notes makes, anyway.
> 
> -- Drew
> 
> Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
> Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by 
> being governed by
> those who are dumber. - Plato
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> 
> 
> Be prepared to increase your admin staff to help maintain it. 
>  My opinion is
> that Notes is a true Groupware product that does 
> E-mail.Exchange is a
> true E-mail product that does some Groupware.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> 
> 
> You guys have been pretty entertaining today. Actually I have been
> considering the conversion from Exchange to Domino for a 
> while but this has
> been quite informative. This really must be a hot topic right 
> now; I just
> received a tech target newlsetter comparing the two a few 
> minutes ago. As a
> fledling admin I haven't been very excited with the concept 
> of converting
> the entire campus to AD to get the (what seems to me)  
> limited benefits of
> EX 2K. Unfortunately I haven't found many other viable 
> options either. Since
> this is an Exchange-stroking sort of group, I wouldn't expect 
> that you would
> have any advice? I guess if I have you guys around I can use 
> your help on
> the conversion. ;-)
> (Emoticons & Groupshield, I know how to make everyone happy)
> Jen Auiler
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cross, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:12 PM
> Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> 
> 
> > Mood Stamps!  Oh me oh my, Mood Stamps!
> >
> > -Richard Simmons
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:07 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> >
> >
> > Excellent  and  thorough  reply,  Patrick!
> >
> > >>Now, when I am forced to use the Outlook client, I am feel like
> something
> > is missing.
> >
> > Please elaborate.  Given that Outlook is the most widely 
> used email client
> > in the world, what do you feel is missing?
> >
> > William
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pat Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:08 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> >
> >
> > 
> > I am a Notes user, and initially couldn't stand the Client. You are
> > correct, not initially intuitive etc...(trust me, I was 
> pretty excited
> > when I first heard that you can use the Outlook client with 
> the a Notes
> > Server). However, once you become familiar with the 
> functionality and
> > interface, it is actually pretty nice. No, it does not have 
> the trademark
> > MS'ified GUI (go figure!!) For me, I think the hard part of 
> accepting
> > Notes was that I KNEW Outlook, and didn't want to take time 
> to learn the
> > new client. Dont get me wrong, I do not dislike 
> Outlook/Exchange (that's
> > how I make a living).
> >
> > I am on Notes R5. I dont know what version you were 
> primarily hammering,
> > but I actually like it. Now, when I am forced to use the 
> Outlook client, I
> > am feel like something is missing.  My mail server has only 
> been down once
> > in two years (that I am aware of) and I have never had to 
> call a help desk
> > on it. (yes, of Course Exchange can also run as long if properly
> > admin'd-maybe even if not!!). I am an Exchange Admin, and 
> only USE Notes,
> > so I am not aware of the technical issues personally.
> >
> > As far as Database functionality, I love that part of Notes 
> now.  I guess
> > you could get the same features elsewhere, although I am 
> not sure they
> > would integrate as smoothly. An observation I have made 
> over that past
> > couple years- it seems that a majority of people who demand 
> more than
> > simple messaging are  Notes users. I probably (off record) wouldn't
> > recommend Notes to your basic email user (simple text messages) who
> > already has issues understanding Outlook. The l

RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange

[Erik Sojka]

I was a Domino administrator (4.0 gold thru 4.6 thru 5.x) for about 5 years.
I had no problems.  

Part of the prlblem, methinks is that one is trying to apply an Exchange/AD
mentality to a system that is not based on Exchange/AD.  

What would the group's response be to a person who joined the list and said:

"Exchange sucks I think Notes is easier to administer"?

> -Original Message-
> From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> 
> 
> It's _like_ AD -- but it doesn't work nearly as well, and 
> it's nearly impossible
> to set up.  Granted, I only spent 6 months as a Notes Admin, 
> but they were a
> VERY unhappy 6 months.
> 
> MS AD simply works better and is easier to administer.
> 
> -- Drew
> 
> Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
> Called 'Satyr' by Michèle Sharik since 2000.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:38 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> 
> 
> Interesting;
> 
> What doesn't make sense specifically?  Other companies have 
> multimaster
> replication in their products for many many years but when MS 
> develops it,
> it is now an acceptible practice and AD is cool/Domino sucks?
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:47 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> >
> >
> > Indeed.  When I was attempting to figure out replication on
> > Notes, it took a
> >  moment for it to make
> > sense... as much
> > sense as Notes makes, anyway.
> >
> > -- Drew
> > 
> > Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
> > Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by
> > being governed by
> > those who are dumber. - Plato
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:32 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> >
> >
> > Be prepared to increase your admin staff to help maintain it.
> >  My opinion is
> > that Notes is a true Groupware product that does
> > E-mail.Exchange is a
> > true E-mail product that does some Groupware.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:22 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> >
> >
> > You guys have been pretty entertaining today. Actually I have been
> > considering the conversion from Exchange to Domino for a
> > while but this has
> > been quite informative. This really must be a hot topic right
> > now; I just
> > received a tech target newlsetter comparing the two a few
> > minutes ago. As a
> > fledling admin I haven't been very excited with the concept
> > of converting
> > the entire campus to AD to get the (what seems to me)
> > limited benefits of
> > EX 2K. Unfortunately I haven't found many other viable
> > options either. Since
> > this is an Exchange-stroking sort of group, I wouldn't expect
> > that you would
> > have any advice? I guess if I have you guys around I can use
> > your help on
> > the conversion. ;-)
> > (Emoticons & Groupshield, I know how to make everyone happy)
> > Jen Auiler
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Cross, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:12 PM
> > Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> >
> >
> > > Mood Stamps!  Oh me oh my, Mood Stamps!
> > >
> > > -Richard Simmons
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:07 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
> > >
> > >
> > > Excellent  and  thorough  reply,  Patrick!
> > >
> > > >>Now, when I am forced to use the Outlook client, I am feel like
>

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet
Architect?  The world-famous Dogg Foundation? 

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg.
> 
> Is Snoop Dog your bro?
> 
> William 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the 
> FAQ [8] and
> read about circular logging. Then post here what your error message is
> in the Event log.
> 
> [1]  Are you on crack or do you have only 2 gig drives?? 
>  [2]
> [2] Remembered the tags this time [3]
> [3] But seriously Circular logging is bad [4]
> [4] you should really read the DR white paper too [5]
> [5] You did not specify version so here are both [7]
> [6] Hi Guiseppe!!
> [7]
> 5.5 DR white paper
> http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B
ackupResto
re.asp

2k DR white paper
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a
sp
[8] the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Transaciton logs in 5.5


We had to turn off circular logging for Arcserver to backup exchnage a
while back.  Anyway, the information store won't start up because it
says the transaction logs are too full.  I re-enabled circular logging,
but the information store still won't start.  Any ideas?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

Yes.  Gracing this list with his presence.  Even if he doesn't read subject
lines.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> THE Milton R Dogg?!?!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:34 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet
> Architect?  The world-famous Dogg Foundation? 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg.
> > 
> > Is Snoop Dog your bro?
> > 
> > William 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the 
> > FAQ [8] and
> > read about circular logging. Then post here what your error 
> message is
> > in the Event log.
> > 
> > [1]  Are you on crack or do you have only 2 gig drives?? 
> >  [2]
> > [2] Remembered the tags this time [3]
> > [3] But seriously Circular logging is bad [4]
> > [4] you should really read the DR white paper too [5]
> > [5] You did not specify version so here are both [7]
> > [6] Hi Guiseppe!!
> > [7]
> > 5.5 DR white paper
> > http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B
> ackupResto
> re.asp
> 
> 2k DR white paper
> http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2k
recovery.a
sp
[8] the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Transaciton logs in 5.5


We had to turn off circular logging for Arcserver to backup exchnage a
while back.  Anyway, the information store won't start up because it
says the transaction logs are too full.  I re-enabled circular logging,
but the information store still won't start.  Any ideas?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

LOL3



> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> LOLx2!!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:02 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> LOL!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> Come on now, don't me in the same line as al gore. That is 
> just not nice.
> 
> 
> VooDoo Blackstone
> http://www.miltonrdogg.dns2go.com/voodoo.jpg
> 
> Get your own Blackstone doll.
> http://www.andgor.com/
> 
> 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> The very same. He worked hand in hand with Al Gore on the 
> design of the
> internet.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> THE Milton R Dogg?!?!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:34 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet
> Architect?  The world-famous Dogg Foundation? 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg.
> > 
> > Is Snoop Dog your bro?
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the FAQ [8]
> > and read about circular logging. Then post here what your error 
> > message is in the Event log.
> > 
> > [1]  Are you on crack or do you have only 2 gig drives?? 
> > [2] [2] Remembered the tags this time [3]
> > [3] But seriously Circular logging is bad [4]
> > [4] you should really read the DR white paper too [5]
> > [5] You did not specify version so here are both [7]
> > [6] Hi Guiseppe!!
> > [7]
> > 5.5 DR white paper
> > http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B
> ackupResto
> re.asp
> 
> 2k DR white paper
> http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2k
recovery.a
sp
[8] the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Transaciton logs in 5.5


We had to turn off circular logging for Arcserver to backup exchnage a while
back.  Anyway, the information store won't start up because it says the
transaction logs are too full.  I re-enabled circular logging, but the
information store still won't start.  Any ideas?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

Who's Kevin?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> Kevin, You need a good grammar checker!
> HAHAH
> jlc
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> Come on now, don't me in the same line as al gore. That is just not
> nice.
> 
> 
> VooDoo Blackstone
> http://www.miltonrdogg.dns2go.com/voodoo.jpg
> 
> Get your own Blackstone doll.
> http://www.andgor.com/
> 
> 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> The very same. He worked hand in hand with Al Gore on the 
> design of the
> internet.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> THE Milton R Dogg?!?!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:34 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet
> Architect?  The world-famous Dogg Foundation? 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg.
> > 
> > Is Snoop Dog your bro?
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the FAQ [8] 
> > and read about circular logging. Then post here what your error 
> > message is in the Event log.
> > 
> > [1]  Are you on crack or do you have only 2 gig 
> drives??  
> > [2] [2] Remembered the tags this time [3]
> > [3] But seriously Circular logging is bad [4]
> > [4] you should really read the DR white paper too [5]
> > [5] You did not specify version so here are both [7]
> > [6] Hi Guiseppe!!
> > [7]
> > 5.5 DR white paper
> > http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B
> ackupResto
> re.asp
> 
> 2k DR white paper
> http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2k
> recovery.a
> sp
> [8] the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Transaciton logs in 5.5
> 
> 
> We had to turn off circular logging for Arcserver to backup exchnage a
> while back.  Anyway, the information store won't start up because it
> says the transaction logs are too full.  I re-enabled 
> circular logging,
> but the information store still won't start.  Any ideas?
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Journaling

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



No,  Public Folders are a well-documented feature...  


  
  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 
  12:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Journaling
  Which leads to the other question - is this "public knowledge" 
  or is this supposed to be a secret? 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Journaling 
  Journaling might do it. 
  I'd consider a mail-enabled public folder with 'send as' 
  privleges to those involved.  Perhaps subfolders 
  by customer.  The conversations will be visible 
  for all.  Are we talking a massive melieu of messages?  What 
  percentage of total message volume? 
  William 
  -Original Message- From: Karl 
  Burbage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  Journaling 
  My boss wants to have a copy of all mail sent between our 
  company (starting at 5 rising to 40 odd users) and 
  selected customers (starting at around 60 rising to 
  120 ish). 
  I've looked into using journaling to do this.  I would 
  use journaling to get the mail to a shared mailbox and 
  then rules to direct it to a specific folder within 
  the mailbox. 
  The idea is that various people within the company can see 
  in chronological order what dialogue was had with 
  specified customers. 
  Could I have anyones comments as to whether this is the right 
  way to do it or is there a more efficient way. 
  
  Regards 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sharing OST files

[Erik Sojka]

OWA?  It would be arelaticely better use of the limited bandwidth than
sync'ing a 1GB OST.


*****
* Erik Sojka, MCSE  *
* Manager, Network Services *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Paul K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Sharing OST files
> 
> 
> Thanks for this.  The problem we're experiencing is that 
> because the mailbox
> in question is over 1GB!! in size we made one OST file and 
> then copied it to
> other machines and this did not work.  Synchronising  this 
> size of mailbox
> over a slow link is not feasible.   Anyone have any 
> ideas of a way
> around this dilemma?  Many thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul
> - Original Message -
> From: Dahl, Peter
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:23 PM
> Subject: RE: Sharing OST files
> 
> 
> When you set up all the users with the appropriate access to 
> that mailbox,
> then create their .ost file it will synch with the Exchange 
> account.  As
> changes are made, the user will get them the next time they 
> synchronize
> their account.  New messages even those downloaded by someone 
> else, will be
> available, they will just appear read.  This will also give them the
> appropriate reply address when they respond using that mailbox.
> 
> P.Dahl.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:19 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Sharing OST files
> 
> 
> Approximately six users need to access the same
> Exchange mailbox REMOTELY and send and receive mail on behalf of that
> mailbox.  Bandwidth is limited, so working offline is 
> ultimately required.
> Thanks for the suggestions so far.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul
> - Original Message -
> From: Ray Zorz
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Sharing OST files
> 
> 
> Maybe you can explain better what you're ultimately trying to 
> accomplish.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:52 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Sharing OST files
> 
> 
> Environment: Exchange Server 5.5 SP4
> Outlook 2000 SR-1a clients
> I was wondering if someone could assist.  I need to share an OST file
> amongst about 6 users, however, as far as I'm aware this 
> can't be done by
> actually sharing the OST file on a LAN say and having the 
> users access it
> from the OL clients.  Anyone know of a way around this. 
> Furthermore, does
> anyone know if it is possible to hardcode a different reply 
> address into an
> OL Exchange (Corp. Admin> mode) client (OL2000) using the 
> SAME SMTP e-mail
> address for several users.  I emphasise the word "same" 
> because we can't do
> this on the Exchange Admin. because users can't have duplicate e-mail
> addresses in their mailboxes (unless someone knows of a way 
> around this).
> Any/all suggestions gratefully received.  Many thanks. Regards, Paul
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 IS Backup

[Erik Sojka]

!3R1ck !32ckup$ R00l!!!

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:56 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 IS Backup
> 
> 
> Correct.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange 2000 IS Backup
> 
> 
> I think I already know the answer to this however I must ask 
> it anyway.
> 
> Environment:
> 
> Windows 2000 Server - Native
> Exchange 2000 - Native (75 users)
> Backup Exec 8.6 w/ Exchange 2000 Agent
> ProLiant 1600 Dual 550/1GB RAM
> OS & Logs - 2 x 9.1GB RAID1 (C 8GB for OS, D 1GB for pagefile)
> Info Store - 3 x 9.1GB RAID5 (E for IS Files only)
> 
> When selecting items to backup with Backup Exec, if I select 
> the Microsoft
> Information Store should I deselect the Drive letter that 
> actually holds
> these files?  I'm assuming that I should still not do 
> individual mailbox
> backups, yes?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Favorite Things...

[Erik Sojka]

::confused::

Kelly gets to see Missy in 6 inch heels?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Favorite Things...
> 
> 
> No, that is Kelly
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:00 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Favorite Things...
> 
> 
> And you'll get to see her in her six inch heels.
> 
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
> (404) 239 - 2981 
> Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a
> difficult one. - Bruce Lee
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:56 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Favorite Things...
> 
> 
> Sheesh.  A hug at MEC.
> 
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:48 PM
> Subject: RE: Favorite Things...
> 
> 
> What's my commission? ;)
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:39 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Favorite Things...
> 
> 
> Hey there...
> 
> I'm on a brief information-gathering mission.  I'm looking for your
> insight here - what are your favorite tricks for administering E2K via
> the ESM? What's your favorite thing that ESM does, or allows you to do
> easily?  And, on the other side, what do you dislike about 
> it?  Is there
> anything you wish that you could change?
> 
> In order to save everyone else from boredom, send replies to
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].  Unless you forget, in which case everyone will
> still live...
> 
> Thanks,
> Missy Koslosky
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?

[Erik Sojka]

You probably meant *Windows* XP of course, as *Office* XP has been on the
shelves for several months.

> -Original Message-
> From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:55 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Correct - I'm not going to base a decision on beta software.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Petukov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:45 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> until Office XP is actually available?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:44 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Won't know until Office XP is actually available and we can see if it
> meets any needs.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:40 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> NO
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:36 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Thanks for the responses, but what I really want to know is 
> not when the
> new plan goes into effect (though that was helpful), but what your
> shop's response is/will be.  Are you planning to buy the Upgrade
> Advantage for your BackOffice products?
> 
> Bob Peitzke
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:23 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> There is an exception to the rule (well maybe not an exception, but I
> can't think of the right word) and that is that the 
> Backoffice CAL will
> no longer be available after October 1st and you will need to  get CAL
> 'Core' packs which I believe will be more expensive.  Backoffice CAL's
> were the cheapest way to get EX, SQL & NT Cals together.
> 
> Simon
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2001 12:26 p.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> > 
> > 
> > Of course I do
> > http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO61803,00.html
> > 
> > Regards,
> >  
> > Sean Martin, MCSE
> > Network Administrator
> > Ribelin Lowell & Company
> > Insurance Brokers, Inc.
> > 3111 C Street, Suite 300
> > Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> > Ph: (907) 561-1250
> > Fax: (907) 561-4315
> > Cell: (907) 229-0885
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:15 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> > 
> > 
> > Does someone have an URL confirming same?
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:16 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> > 
> > 
> > That is what I heard from Microsoft.  End of Feb.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:13 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> > 
> > 
> > I was told by a CDW rep that it was pushed back to the end of 
> > February, 2002
> >  
> > Regards,
> >  
> > Sean Martin, MCSE
> > Network Administrator
> > Ribelin Lowell & Company
> > Insurance Brokers, Inc.
> > 3111 C Street, Suite 300
> > Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> > Ph: (907) 561-1250
> > Fax: (907) 561-4315
> > Cell: (907) 229-0885
> > Email:  
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:59 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> > 
> > 
> > Didn't MS back off and put that off until Feb 1?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:03 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> > 
> > 
> > I'm curious about what approach other shops in the 60-120 
> user range 
> > are taking to Microsoft's new SW licensing plan that takes effect 
> > October 1st.
> >  
> > Is your shop buying Upgrade Advantages now on your 
> > NT/Win2K/Exchange/SQL Server products?
> >  
> > Bob Peitzke
> > Information Systems Manager
> > Sander A. Kessler & Associates
> > Santa Monica, CA, USA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.su

RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?

[Erik Sojka]

::spreading hands out like a Hollywood director::

I can see the billboards now...

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:50 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 

> 
> BSD!  Because it sucks less than Linux!
> 
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blackberry

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



They're yummy in pies.
 
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Micciche Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 
  22, 2001 9:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Blackberry
  I am looking for 
  an unbiased synopsis of this product from an Exchange admin.  I would 
  love to know what the fascination is.  Could someone give me a short 
  opinion and a few bullet comments about it's main 
  features?
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Can not access Email Acct

[Erik Sojka]

Do you use Outlook?

Wait, wrong list...

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Can not access Email Acct
> 
> 
> ps.  it's not a "file", it's a "message"
> 
> -Michèle
> Immigration site:  
> Our new 2001 Miata:  
> Tiggercam:  
> -
> An orgasm is a person who accompanies a church choir. 
> -
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:36 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Can not access Email Acct
> 
> 
> I hung as soon as I clicked on the file.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:23 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Can not access Email Acct
> 
> 
> I had a similar issue. Go into Service, Properties, Advanced 
> and add the
> users mailbox to your profile. Then try deleting it from there.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Can not access Email Acct
> 
> 
> Ok, I was able to open his account and as long as I did not 
> click on two
> DNR msgs, the Outlook did not hang. As soon as I clicked on one of
> those two msgs, Outlook hangs. How can I get rid of those msgs?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Penrod 
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:04 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Can not access Email Acct
> 
> 
> I have tried access his account on different machines with 
> newly created
> mail profiles and I have also chosen File - Open Other Users Folder
> (Inbox) and it hangs.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Penrod 
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:44 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Can not access Email Acct
> 
> 
> I have one user whos account I can not access. When I try, Outlook
> (O2K) hangs. I have deleted the profile and recreated it. I have tried
> accessing his account from different machines. I have rebooted the
> server.
> 
> When I launch Outlook, it opens, I can see the inbox, but as soon as I
> click on something, it hangs.
> 
> I am running E2K on W2K.
> 
> Any ideas? I am new to Exchange.
> 
> Larry
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>  
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>  
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>  
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: automated response

[Erik Sojka]

Thanks.  That was pretty kewl of you to inform us of that.



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:38 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: automated response
> 
> 
> I am now out of the o
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Calendar issues

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



There's a difference.  When you open up the account you are directly 
accessing the calendar.  When you schedule a meeting from another account, 
you are looking at the published Free/Busy information, which according to 
certain client-side settings, may not contain more than 2 months ahead of the 
current date.
 
Create 
NT accounts for the resource accounts and sign onto a PC with that 
account.  Go into Outlook with the resource account as the primary mailbox, 
and set the Outlook parameters for Free/Busy publishing.
 
To 
take care of everybody else, put the following into the logon script (assuming 
OL2K, tweak the values for your environment):
%0\..\REG ADD HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences /v 
FBPublishRange /t REG_DWORD /d 0x000c  /f%0\..\REG ADD 
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences /v FBUpdateSecs /t 
REG_DWORD /d 0x0384  /f
 
 
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Calendar issues
  I'll 
  be danged. Was just starting to research something similiar.  If we open 
  up our meeting room, we can schedule months in advance.  If we invite the 
  same meeting room from within our calendar, there's no data 
  available. 
   
  
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 
11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Calendar 
issues

I am 
not sure how to ask this question or word it so I will list the 
problem.
 
Problem:
 
When 
a user creates an appointment request or meeting request, no calendar 
information is shown when you go to 
availability.
 
But
 
When 
you use the File Open other's calendar, the scheduled information shows 
up.
 
I 
know in outlook there is a registry entry for controlling the cache usage 
and you have three options.  But 
I can repeat the problem in all versions of outlook, and in outlook machines 
that have and that do not have the Registry 
change.
 
I am 
not sure even how to trouble shoot this.  
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

This electronic message (email) is intended 
only for the 
use of the individual or entity named above, 
and may 
contain information that is privileged, 
confidential 
and protected from disclosure under applicable 
law. 
If the reader of this message is not the 
intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any 

dissemination, distribution or copying of this 

communication, or the taking of any action 
relative 
to its contents, is strictly prohibited. If 
you have 
received this communication in error, please 
notify us 
immediately by telephone at (310) 553-1707 or 
by email. 
Please destroy all hard copies of this 
communication 
and delete it from all electronic files. Thank 
you. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: saving emails

[Erik Sojka]

Yeah, I know.  Standing in Times Square watching the ball drop on New Year's
Eve.  Torture!

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:02 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: saving emails
> 
> 
> We don't monitor staff emails.  
> 
> We assess the number of staff required for a department, then 
> employ one
> fewer than that.  They have no time to send 600MB of mp3's 
> home, let alone
> learn what an mp3 is.
> 
> I wouldn't want to have to do Mr Clark's job. 
> 
> William
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Hanks
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Sent: 8/29/01 6:13 PM
> Subject: RE: saving emails
> 
> As the admin, I have the ability to connect to any of the mailboxes on
> our
> ex5.5 sp3 server.  I would simply open the mailbox as an additional
> mailbox
> and copy the required email to a .pst.  However I wouldn't do 
> this as I
> respect my users' privacy :-)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2001 0:52
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: saving emails
> 
> 
> We use a backup tape.
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:49 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: saving emails
> 
> 
> anyone know a way to automatically save the emails in the 
> inbox, outbox,
> sent items, and delted items to an arhived area for review without the
> user
> knowing?
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: HP to acquire Compaq?

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Hoyl 
and Narf also come to mind.

  
  -Original Message-From: Cunningham, Andy 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 
  2001 8:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: HP 
  to acquire Compaq?
  No 
  to mention yikes
   
  AndyC 
  
-Original Message-From: Siatkowski, Jason 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 September 2001 
14:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: HP to 
acquire Compaq?
and egads too. 
-Original Message- From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: HP to 
acquire Compaq? 
Wow. 
http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/09/03/deals/wires/hp_re/ 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Unable to Delete Newsgroup public folders

[Erik Sojka]

That PF can't be deleted.  You can hide it, though.

> -Original Message-
> From: Rolph Macphie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:54 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Unable to Delete Newsgroup public folders
> 
> 
> When I try to delete or even access the Newsgroup folder I get
> "The content of this public folder are currrnetly 
> unavailable. Either the
> Microsoft Exchange Server computer servicing this public 
> folder  is down or
> the public folder has not been replicated to this site. See your
> administrator."
> 
> "Microsoft Exchange Server Information store"
> ID No:80004005-0507-
> 
> The message from the client is almost the same. I have 
> ownership permission
> to the folder any idea's
> 
> Rolph Macphie
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

The Exchange and Windows SPs are cumulative.  You only need to install the
latest one.  


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> I'm installing Exchange 5.5 for the first time. Do I need to 
> install the
> previous service packs, or can I just install SP4 and it will 
> cover all the
> updates?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sending HTML to list (DON'T!!!!)

[Erik Sojka]

Shut up!

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:20 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Sending HTML to list (DON'T)
> 
> 
> Exchange lists are notoriously rude.  It's the best part.
> 
> I'd go nuts trying to read this list in digest mode.
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin D. Alons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:21 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Sending HTML to list (DON'T)
> 
> 
> I recently signed up for this list (in digest mode) and while 
> the content
> can be helpful, the users here are incredibly rude.  I don't 
> know if there
> are any recommended guidelines, but here are mine:
>   1) NO HTML posts, it is obnoxious to wade through it in 
> digest mode
> (and I doubt that email mode is much better!).
>   2) Snip (and include) only relevant info from original 
> (replied to)
> posts.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Kevin Alons
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Fmuuh?
 
http://www.microsoft.com/PIRACY/samguide/tools/cal_guide/exchange.asp
 
Exchange CALs must be purchased separately, and the purchase of an 
Exchange CAL entitles you to the use of Outlook.

  
  -Original Message-From: Don Guyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:52 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
  Licenses with Exchange?
  Scott, 
      It will come with 
  Exchange Client Access Licenses (how many varies), so users can connect to the 
  Exchange server, but not for the Outlook program itself.
  Don Guyer Information Systems 
  Citadel Federal Credit Union Ph: 
  800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org 
  -Original Message- From: Scott 
  Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 
  Licenses with Exchange? 
  Hi, Our company is moving to Exchange 
  and we will be purchasing Exchange 2000 cals. I read 
  somewhere (I think on this list) that you get Outlook licenses 
  when you by Exchange. Is this accurate? Can someone 
  elaborate? We have a number of clients who need email 
  but don't have Office. 
  Scott Erwin Network 
  Administrator Neptune Chemical Pump Co 
  http://www.neptune1.com 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files

[Erik Sojka]

Run the Exchange Performance Optimizer to move the log files.  

In the Admin program, look at the "Mailbox Resource" view under the server
where the user is homed to see the size of the mailbox.


*****
* Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
* Manager, Network Services *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Need help moving Exchange database log files
> 
> 
> I need to move the exchange database logging files (edb 
> and mdb)
> off of my main hard drive as they are filling up the drive 
> and shutting
> down the Exchange services.  At present I am running Backup Exec with
> differential backups and so have turned off Circular logging. 
>  This has
> also been suggested in some of the reading I have done on 
> exchange.  As a
> result, more log files are being written in the mdbdata directories. 
> Ideally, I would like to move these and all other logging 
> files to the d:
> drive and I would like to know, should this be done only when 
> there are no
> users on the system, will this improve or adversly affect the 
> operation of
> the exchange server and will Backup Exec have a problem backing up the
> exchange mailboxes if these files are moved in the middle of the day.
> 
> An error showed up on Bup Exec yesterday that it could not backup the
> Information stores because the log files had been moved or 
> deleted after I
> tried to move a users mailbox and import it on to the 
> Exchange server. 
> This filled up the c: drive (he had 2000 messages) with 
> loging files in
> mdbdata and shut down the Exchange services.  So I moved the 
> log files to
> the d: drive temporarily to get exchange running.  If I move 
> them back c:\
> will fill up again and down the service.
> 
> Also, How can I find out how big the information store is for 
> a particular
> user?
> What a mess!
> Thanks.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Little bit more Exchange info

[Erik Sojka]

Yes.  Toot-sweet!

And as William mentioned, do nightly full backups.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Little bit more Exchange info
> 
> 
> Thanks everybody for your help, just one more question, this circular
> logging, it says in some publications that it is best to 
> disable this, any
> general consensus??
> Thanks
> Jenn
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking email

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



[1] Hi 
Sherry!

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 
  30, 2001 2:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Blocking email
  Then 
  mine is broken, because it blocks entire domains.  Is there a 
  patch?
   
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:43 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Blocking 
  email
  It 
  will only block specific email addresses, it does not include the 
  functionality to block entire domains.  It's a 
  "feature".
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 
1:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Blocking email
yes
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  should block 
all email from that person
 
or 
@domain.com should block all email from that domain.. it 
doesnt

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  October 30, 2001 1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Blocking email
  It should.
   
  When blocking by domain you included the "@" 
  symbol, yes?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:15 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Blocking 
  email
  Exchange 5.5 
  sp4:
   
  using the 
  message filtering option on the IMS doesnt actually block emails, even 
  with the turfdir created...any ideas?
   
  Michael Ross
  Network Analyst 2
  Panduit Corp.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
   
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OT Halloween tricks

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Crazy 
nut!  Pizza?  Whooboy, you got a designated 
driver?

  
  -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, 
  Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
  1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT Halloween 
  tricks
  Okay, this 
  group just loves off topic hoohahs so here is a good 
  one. In the US we celebrate Halloween with a fervor, 
  at least those of us that are cool do.    My company is having 
  a Halloween party today, pizza, the whole nine 
  yards. 
   
   
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

[Erik Sojka]

The cool Exchange admins are over on the Swynk list.

> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar, Ashish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:39 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> Do you think that every exchange administrator in the world 
> is on this list?
> 
> -- Drew
> 
> Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
> "You do not need an AR-15, or M-60 to hunt Bambi." -- Tom McCarty
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar, Ashish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> So from what you all have told me, from an administration and 
> maintenance
> perspective BLB sux.
> 
> So why is every one of you is asking this question to all the 
> vendors ?
> 
> "Q> Do you have mailbox level recovery ?" and if the answer 
> is "NO NO!" ...
> "and the reasons are "blah_blah!!"" the answer is "OH those 
> guys have it,
> and those too...how come you don't have it?..." etc etc
> 
> >From a business perspective vendors are getting asked this 
> question from
> end
> users (business and technical decision makers like you all) 
> ALL THE TIME so
> maybe there's some disconnect here.
> 
> Management doesn't care HOW you do it, they care on whether 
> you CAN do it or
> not. They prefer if you CAN.
> 
> And what I've gleaned from this thread is that some of you DO 
> use mailbox or
> mail level recovery and have a business need for it, maybe as 
> an extension
> of DIR or as a vendor product feature. Sure, no one 
> recommends it, it bumps
> up costs, hardware, software and maintenance, and probably 
> many don't set it
> up, but everyone asks for it and it is among the "number one" 
> questions for
> evaluating and buying a product.
> 
> thanks for all the feedback!
> 
> regards,
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:41 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> We were considering Comvault, but never was able to connect 
> with their sales
> to get a price.  A real budget breaker, eh?
> 
> mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
> Steve Ropiak
> ZF Group NAO
> CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> There is NO business that needs BLB.   (MAYBE if you can 
> afford Commvault)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> "Horses for Courses" - It really does depend on your type of business
> environment.  On this particular customer site, some sales 
> deals in one
> department can take a year to complete.  I have been asked to retrieve
> mails from 6 -7 months previous (The answer at the time was 
> no as we did
> not do Brick Level Backup, and I was not going to restore the whole
> Private store for one mail & unfortunately the user had deleted the
> archive.pst) After getting it in the neck for that one, we 
> are now doing
> BLB's
> 
> P.S. What is the maximum retention time with E2K anybody know?
> 
> 
> SB
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:29 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> Why the "!"?
> 
> I have been using a DIR period of 35 days ever since going live with
> Exchange 5.5 2 years ago.  In all of that time, we have NEVER 
> had to do
> a
> message or mailbox restore from tape.
> 
> -Michèle
> Immigration site:  
> Our new 2001 Miata:  
> Tiggercam:  
> -
> Motivational Speaker Klingon: EVERY day is a good day to die! Say it
> with
> me!
> -
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:14 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
> 
> 
> People sometimes want a mail restored that they deleted more th

RE: How do you send a recurring message

[Erik Sojka]

What happens when you try it for yourself?  

Yegods!  If you had experimented a bit yourself instead of waiting for the
list members to do your work for you, you could have had this finished by
now.

> -Original Message-
> From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How do you send a recurring message
> 
> 
> Thanks for the input.
> 
> When assigning a recurring task does it send you a message to 
> let you know
> you have to do it again and again and again?
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Mike
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How do you send a recurring message
> 
> 
> In outlook use the options then use View-Options-Do not 
> deliver before.
> 
> Or you can assign a task and put in recurring updates
> 
> ellery july
> phone - 651-225-3895 
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:16 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: How do you send a recurring message
> 
> 
> Good afternoon,
> 
> Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4 
> 
> Does anyone know how to send a reminder (recurring) message?  
> I have several
> users that need to be reminded of tasks that have to be done 
> (once a week,
> once a month, once a year, etc.) They do not want this to be 
> a recurring
> meeting eating up time slots.
> 
> Thanks in advance for all of your help and harassment.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike Mitchell
> Systems eMAIL Administrator
> Alverno Information Services
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: No reminders for one user (me)

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Gee, 
Ray, where do you get that from??  

  
  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:13 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: No reminders 
  for one user (me)
  There's a utility called scancal (I think) available from MS that may 
  be worth looking at. 
  
-Original Message-From: Neil 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 
10:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: No 
reminders for one user (me)
Try removing any reoccurring reminders from the calendar.  I 
came across this and it turned out to be a corrupt reoccurrence - The clean 
options didn't work on it.
 
Regards,
 
Neil Raggett

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 07 February 2002 15:07To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: No reminders for one user 
  (me)
  Using Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a. Outlook 2k 

  I don't get ANY reminders. Other users do. I have default 
  reminders set to 15 minutes before an event. Schedule an event (or more 
  likely have someone schedule one for me). I never get a reminder, all 
  others that I have checked with do.
  I have tried starting outlook with /cleanreminders and 
  /cleanfreebusy. Still no reminders. 
  What am I missing (i.e. what did I mess with this 
  time)? 
  Thanks for any help Kelly 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



KMart 
does;  There is a KMart employee on the Swynk list.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  February 14, 2002 12:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2
  I'm the same 
  with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing 
  so.
  I'm a Target 
  kind of guy.
   
  Just to be on 
  topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? 
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 
9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future 
plans 2
He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, 
neither will I... 
-Original Message- From: 
Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
you must not be married. 
-Original Message- From: 
William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Future plans 2 
I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you 
refer.  I don't think they exist.  Are you sure you have the name 
right?
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Future plans 2 
The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because 
I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK.  They've got several 
people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I 
think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA.  Using SSL of 
course... :-)
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
Solutions   -Original Message- From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: 
Future plans 2 
That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. 
I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed 
recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options 
that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use 
their domain 
there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected 
sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around 
this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original 
Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal 
department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean 
squat in the legal world.  You are talking about basically 
interchanging internal company information.  That, plus you don't have 
a plan in place how you want to accomplish this.  The owner of the 
domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even 
be possible.  In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX 
record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a 
way to route the messages destined for their employees.  Otherwise, 
mail is going to bounce.  Why?  Because the way that MX records 
work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent 
to it.  There will be some messages that get sent to the other 
server.  There isn't any way around this.  That means that you 
will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other 
company.  You get a message for a person at the other company, and your 
Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it.  You don't 
have any recipients with that name set up.  Ends up being very 
messy.
I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients 
for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would 
work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for 
you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those 
custom recipients forward the mail to your server.  That, or setting up 
some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if 
not the only, solutions to what you are asking.  Anything else is 
sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your 
problem.
If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why 
don't they provide the solution?  Otherwise, tell them to go with the 
above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using 

RE: e-mail arriving in batches

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Is it 
that the mail is arriving on the server in batches?  Or the notification on 
the client is messed up to suggest that the emails appear in the Inbox in 
batches?
 
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:57 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
  rebooted 
  the server
  all 
  clients are affected with the problem
  

-Original Message-From: David N. 
Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 
2002 1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
e-mail arriving in batches
What did you reboot ? the client or the server ?
I 
didnt think Outlook 97 worked with Exchange

  -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 
  14:28 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
  Our clients are not getting e-mail in Outlook unless 
  they click on another folder within Outlook.  Then the mail is 
  sent/received in batches.  I don't believe it's a udp port 
  issue.  Any other ideas?  Last time a reboot fixed the problem, 
  but I'd rather not have to do that again.
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 2000 using Outlook 97, 
  2000, & 2002 
  Angie Sawyer List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Test

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



1, 2, 
3?

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 
  2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Test
  ..es 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  Test 
  Test 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.

[Erik Sojka]

I'll be able to afford it once I get my money from that Nigerian Prince who
secretly contacted me.  

It's either your software or Penis enlargement.  I don't know yet which
SPAMMER I'll buy from...

> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:53 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: If you are looking for tools to help with the 
> Administration of Exchange, respond to this.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
>I have partnered up with a company that basically automates the
> repetitive tasks associated with MS Exchange Administration.
> 
>Everything from fully provisioning new accounts by simply 
> entering the
> employee's ID number, to deactivating accounts and scheduling them for
> deletion at a later date, to moving mailboxes can be 
> automated.  The tools
> are about 90% out of the box and 10% customizable to a particular
> organization's business rules making it very application specific.
> 
>If you are interested, drop me an e-mail and we can discus your
> situation.  Thanks for your time.
> 
> Tom Verde
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: The case of the vanishing email

[Erik Sojka]

Send a message to the user with a keyword in the subject that won't normally
be found in his/her messages.  "rollerskate" for example.

Use OL's find feature to find all messages with "rollerskate" in the
subject.



> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:24 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: The case of the vanishing email
> 
> 
> Does anyone have their dearstalker & pipe with them today?
> 
> I have a user who cannot send mail to a particular mailbox, 
> or to be more accurate he can send the mail and it goes it 
> even seems to arrive at the client (lil envelope in the 
> system tray) but there is nothing in the users folders.  The 
> message tracking tells me it's been delivered, there don't 
> seem to be any rules setup on the client to dump mail from this user.
> 
> Every other user can send to this person and receive from the 
> guy whose mail is getting lost.
> 
> Any Ideas?
> 
> Stu
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SSL - no visble certificate

[Erik Sojka]

Can you clarify "no visible certificate"?  If the client can't see the cert,
how can it verify the cert?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: SSL - no visble certificate
> 
> 
> I've been asked to set-up an OWA Exchange 5.5 server that uses SSL but
> without the client seeing the certificate. I am using MS Cert 
> Server but
> the certificate is displayed each time I access the OWA 
> server. Clients
> must be able to access OWA from Internet Cafes so imbedding the
> certificate is not possible.
> I'm told the "banks can do it". Will Thawte or VeriSign 
> certificates do
> this for me because they are trusted providers?
> Thanks in advance, o knowlegeable ones!
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ

[Erik Sojka]

Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off!

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ
> 
> 
> This may require a little translation. ROTFLMAO?
> 
> Don's and my opinions may differ on the equipment, but
> I think everyone will recomend a proxy instead of
> sticking your email on a dmz. too Many holes. You may
> want to specify the the ip of that machine only.
> Chris
> --- "Joe L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ROTFLMAO
> > 
> > jlc
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:35 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Consultant's name and email address please.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Craig Sterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:32 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ
> > 
> > It was based on a recomendation from a consultant to
> > provide a more
> > secure environment on our internal network.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:53 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ
> > 
> > Craig,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Why are you moving your exchange server to the dmz?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Craig Sterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:26 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ
> > 
> > We are going to be moving our Exchange 5.5 sp4
> > server into our DMZ off
> > our firewall from our internal network.  I know
> > there is something that
> > must be done as far as configuring the communication
> > ports that exchange
> > uses.  Does anyone have a good resource for this
> > information on making
> > these changes?
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits

[Erik Sojka]

And since your message was so important, we'll send it to you first!!

> -Original Message-
> From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> i like it too, please send it to me!
> 
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Expuesto a las: Miércoles, 20 de Marzo de 2002 05:50 p.m.
> Expuesto en: Trafico de Mails
> Conversación: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> Asunto: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> I'd love that little app myself!
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Joe Irvine
> Director of Information Technology
> The Business Office, Inc.
> (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
> www.tbopayroll.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Adams, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:45 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> Yhea send that to me too.. i like that
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> Man that is funny...I need you to send that to me...keep my sanity by
> watching others go crazy.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:35 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> We do the same type of thing, in-house.  We wrote a little 
> program that we
> send out as an attachment from time-to-time.  We send it to 
> everyone in the
> company with a forged header to appear to come from elsewhere, and we
> include a nice little "pigeon-english" subject, similar to "I 
> send you this
> file to have your advice" ;-).  
> If the (l)user runs it, a nice little box pops up on their PC 
> and lets them
> know that they could have just hosed their machine and 
> seriously fzckued up
> the network.  It also logs their username to a text file on one of our
> servers, so we can keep tabs on who we caught.  It makes for good
> entertainment on a Friday afternoon.
> 
> -Jim
> 
> Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Engineer
> Advertising.com
> 
> We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com --
> Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> I heard a comment on some tech show last week from someone 
> who was talking
> about the dangers of email bombs, and apparently there is a 
> service out
> there that you can connect to, compose a "tempting" junk mail for your
> users, and send it off to see who will actually blow off the 
> "be careful"
> policy at work and just open the message and/or corresponding 
> attachment
> anyway.  I assume that when someone opens the attachment, it 
> will in turn
> e-mail some kind of  a report back to the service (or maybe 
> directly to
> you?), where you can gather stats on who/how many went for 
> it.  This guy
> quoted a stat -- something like 40% of users will typically open any
> message/attachment regardless of policy or the repeated 
> preaching by email
> admins.
> 
> I got a call recently (rather irate user) trying to open an 
> attachment from
> an unsupported app... 
> user: "I can't open an attachment"  
> me: "what is it - a word doc or spreadsheet or something?" 
> user: "I don't know" 
> me: "is it something you were expecting from someone?" 
> user: "no" 
> me: "why are you trying to open it?" 
> user: "I just want to see what it is"  
> me: "just ignore it"
> user: "but why can't I open it?"
> me: "you're PC doesn't recognize what it is"
> user: "well, I sent to so-and-so, and what's-her-name, 
> (etc..), and they
> can't open it either"
> me:  "just delete it and I'll tell them to do the same"
> 
> Our users not only dive into the unknown, but they make sure 
> their friends
> are doing the same - aarhhhh!  These guys get the sermon 
> on a regular
> basis but it just doesn't sink in.  When I heard about this 
> kind of service
> out there, I thought "this is kind of sneaky (would it even 
> be considered a
> kind of entrapment?)",  but it would clearly demonstrate the 
> problem to the
> managers here.  Someone on another list once made a very wise comment
> (probably been said here too) about trying to use technology to solve
> behavioral problems, but that's not my intent.  I'd like to 
> use technology
> to raise awareness of the problem - not to solve it.  The 
> service might give
> us a more tangible idea i

RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits

[Erik Sojka]

Jaysus Christmas, people.  Don't send this to the list.  

Jim H: can you put the application on a server somewhere so all of the
frigging AOLusers can shut up?

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> Please send the app to me as well.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Greg Pickett, MCSE
> Information Systems Manager
> S. A. Miro, Inc.
> 303-741-3737
> www.samiro.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> I'd love that little app myself!
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Joe Irvine
> Director of Information Technology
> The Business Office, Inc.
> (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
> www.tbopayroll.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Adams, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:45 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> Yhea send that to me too.. i like that
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> Man that is funny...I need you to send that to me...keep my sanity by
> watching others go crazy.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:35 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> We do the same type of thing, in-house.  We wrote a little 
> program that we
> send out as an attachment from time-to-time.  We send it to 
> everyone in the
> company with a forged header to appear to come from elsewhere, and we
> include a nice little "pigeon-english" subject, similar to "I 
> send you this
> file to have your advice" ;-).  
> If the (l)user runs it, a nice little box pops up on their PC 
> and lets them
> know that they could have just hosed their machine and 
> seriously fzckued up
> the network.  It also logs their username to a text file on one of our
> servers, so we can keep tabs on who we caught.  It makes for good
> entertainment on a Friday afternoon.
> 
> -Jim
> 
> Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Engineer
> Advertising.com
> 
> We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com --
> Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
> 
> 
> I heard a comment on some tech show last week from someone 
> who was talking
> about the dangers of email bombs, and apparently there is a 
> service out
> there that you can connect to, compose a "tempting" junk mail for your
> users, and send it off to see who will actually blow off the 
> "be careful"
> policy at work and just open the message and/or corresponding 
> attachment
> anyway.  I assume that when someone opens the attachment, it 
> will in turn
> e-mail some kind of  a report back to the service (or maybe 
> directly to
> you?), where you can gather stats on who/how many went for 
> it.  This guy
> quoted a stat -- something like 40% of users will typically open any
> message/attachment regardless of policy or the repeated 
> preaching by email
> admins.
> 
> I got a call recently (rather irate user) trying to open an 
> attachment from
> an unsupported app... 
> user: "I can't open an attachment"  
> me: "what is it - a word doc or spreadsheet or something?" 
> user: "I don't know" 
> me: "is it something you were expecting from someone?" 
> user: "no" 
> me: "why are you trying to open it?" 
> user: "I just want to see what it is"  
> me: "just ignore it"
> user: "but why can't I open it?"
> me: "you're PC doesn't recognize what it is"
> user: "well, I sent to so-and-so, and what's-her-name, 
> (etc..), and they
> can't open it either"
> me:  "just delete it and I'll tell them to do the same"
> 
> Our users not only dive into the unknown, but they make sure 
> their friends
> are doing the same - aarhhhh!  These guys get the sermon 
> on a regular
> basis but it just doesn't sink in.  When I heard about this 
> kind of service
> out there, I thought "this is kind of sneaky (would it even 
> be considered a
> kind of entrapment?)",  but it would clearly demonstrate the 
> problem to the
> managers here.  Someone on another list once made a very wise comment
> (probably been said here too) about trying to use technology to solve
> behavioral problems, but that's not my intent.  I'd like to 
> use technology
> to raise 

RE: datbase

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Call 
PSS.  1018 errors are bad.  

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:01 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  datbase
  ok
   
  I did what MS 
  said..
  exmerged it 
  out
  created a new 
  DB
  exmerged it back 
  in
   
  the store runs, 
  and people work, but i cannot back it up
  I get this in the 
  event log
  
  MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
  -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
   
  ?
   
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange Administrator
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay

[Erik Sojka]

The bigger question is:  will some of the folks who run the various RBLs
accept that you are not a relay even if you don't immediately return a 5xx?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay
> 
> 
> I was reading that too. I liked it. Long time coming.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay
> 
> 
> XIMS: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay 
> E-Mail Messages in
> Third-Party Tests (Q304897)
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q304897
> 
> I like this one because it shows the six primary SMTP relay tests.
> 
> William
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

I 
want to install patches all ni-i-ight.
Brick backups ev-er-y day!!!

> -Original Message-
> From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Not all patches are applicable to your installation. 
> Installing patches
> because you may want to prevent issues that may or may not 
> show up violates
> the engineering principle of KISS.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:   Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:38 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> > 
> > You shouldn't eh - so, wait until I have the problem, then patch? No
> > thanks.
> > 
> > Steve Clark
> > Clark Systems Support, LLC
> > AVIEN Charter Member
> > "Who's watching your network?"
> > www.clarksupport.com
> >   301-610-9584 voice
> >   240-465-0323 Efax
> > 
> > The data furnished in connection with this document is 
> deemed by Clark
> > Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and 
> privileged information
> > and
> > shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others 
> without the prior
> > written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:34 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> > 
> > You shouldn't install hotfixes just because they exist. You 
> should only
> > install fixes if you are experiencing issues that the 
> hotfix addresses.
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:22 PM
> > > To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject:  RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> > > 
> > > Nope - just keeping them up to date so I don't have problems.
> > > 
> > > Steve Clark
> > > Clark Systems Support, LLC
> > > AVIEN Charter Member
> > > "Who's watching your network?"
> > > www.clarksupport.com
> > >   301-610-9584 voice
> > >   240-465-0323 Efax
> > > 
> > > The data furnished in connection with this document is 
> deemed by Clark
> > > Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and 
> privileged information
> > > and
> > > shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others 
> without the
> > prior
> > > written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:18 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> > > 
> > > You must have had a lot of problems with your servers to 
> have to install
> > > those patches.
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From:   Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent:   Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:39 AM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject:RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> > > > 
> > > > I've got every hotfix, patch and update install on all 
> my 5.5 servers
> > > with
> > > > no problems.
> > > > 
> > > > Steve Clark
> > > > Clark Systems Support, LLC
> > > > AVIEN Charter Member
> > > > "Who's watching your network?"
> > > > www.clarksupport.com
> > > >   301-610-9584 voice
> > > >   240-465-0323 Efax
> > > > 
> > > > The data furnished in connection with this document is 
> deemed by Clark
> > > > Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged
> > information
> > > > and
> > > > shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of 
> others without the
> > > prior
> > > > written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
> > > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:15 AM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
> > > > 
> > > > There appear to be about 8 patches that have been released since
> > > Exchange
> > > > 5.5 SP4.
> > > > Has anybody had any problems with any of these patches?  Is it
> > > recommended
> > > > to install
> > > > them separately, over a several week period, or should 
> I just go for
> > it
> > > > and
> > > > install them all
> > > > now?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > Robert
> > > > 
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > 
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter

RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise

[Erik Sojka]

It is straight forward and will retain all the configurations. 

> -Original Message-
> From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:40 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise
> 
> 
> has anyone upgraded Exchange 5.5 Standard Edition to 
> Enterprise?  It is
> supposed to be straight forward and retain all the 
> configurations.  Please
> offer any suggestions if applicable.  thanks
> 
> JR
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: WLKMMAS, members please help

[Erik Sojka]

I have a solution for you, but since the question was addressed to the
WLKMMAS, I shant help.  

Unless you want to post another message addressed to the ESJMAS.

> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:45 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: WLKMMAS, members please help
> 
> 
> I am doing a little fill in sys admin at a place.  you know 
> the job. just
> watch the servers and make sure nothing happens.  Well when I 
> walked in this
> morning the receptionist was telling me she couldn't get at 
> the company
> phone book (public folder).  It was there when I left 
> yesterday.  Anyway I'm
> not very good at 5.5.  is there a way I can restore just that 
> folder with
> out hosing / setting back the whole exchange.  They are using 
> backup exec.
> with the exchange agent.  The exchange backup is just that a 
> job called
> exchange and exchange is selected. I'm waiting till tonight 
> when all the
> users are gone and I can do a restore.  any thoughts or ideas.
> Tia
> Matt
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Today

[Erik Sojka]

Messages don't normally get moved to Outlook Today.  OLT is more of a view
of your account, not really a folder.  

What are you seeing that makes you think this?  

Try sending a message to the affected account with a unique subject, then
use "Advanced Find" to search for that message.  What folder is it in?

> -Original Message-
> From: Oscar Velasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:49 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Outlook Today
> 
> 
> Where do they go and how can one retrieve messages that have 
> been move by 
> mistake to the Outlook Today .
> MS Outlook 2000 on Win2k Pro.
> Thanks,
> 
> Oscar 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

Nope.  Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, delete the
account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then Exmerge the data
back in.  This *will* break all existing pointers to the person (I.e. a
person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they re-address the
message)

It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason.  


*****
* Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
* Manager, Network Services *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> I have created several organizational units on my Exchange 
> 5.5 server. The
> organizational units divide our users into several Recipients. I would
> like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder 
> to the other
> sub organizational folders. Can this be done?
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

Wow.  Good article.  

So them MVPs know some stuff, huh?

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:10 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> This is the best method I have found
> http://www.mvps.org/exchange/containermove_frames.htm
> 
> --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:08 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Nope.  Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, 
> delete the
> account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then 
> Exmerge the data
> back in.  This *will* break all existing pointers to the 
> person (I.e. a
> person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they 
> re-address the
> message)
> 
> It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason.  
> 
> 
> *
> * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
> * Manager, Network Services *
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
> * 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > I have created several organizational units on my Exchange
> > 5.5 server. The
> > organizational units divide our users into several 
> Recipients. I would
> > like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder 
> > to the other
> > sub organizational folders. Can this be done?
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

The old message still contains the pointers to the old address (i.e. when
replying, a new lookup isn't automatically performed).  

And that makes sense;  to perform another lookup against the GAL or Contacts
folder would add some unnecessry load to the server.  It's reasonable for
Outlook to assume that nothing has changed with the recipients' address(es)
when replying to a message.  


*****
* Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
* Manager, Network Services *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: JENSEN, TIMOTHY C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:30 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Wouldn't the creation of an X.500 address on the new mailbox 
> resolve the NDR
> problem on emails sent prior to the move?
> 
> Tim Jensen
> Cingular Wireless, Chicago
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Nope.  Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, 
> delete the
> account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then 
> Exmerge the data
> back in.  This *will* break all existing pointers to the 
> person (I.e. a
> person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they 
> re-address the
> message)
> 
> It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason.  
> 
> 
> *
> * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
> * Manager, Network Services *
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
> * 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > I have created several organizational units on my Exchange
> > 5.5 server. The
> > organizational units divide our users into several 
> Recipients. I would
> > like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder 
> > to the other
> > sub organizational folders. Can this be done?
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5

[Erik Sojka]

'tis good for cleaning up such a scenario, though.

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:03 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Great solution. But as you can see, it is still a lot of 
> work. To me it just
> ads fuel to the fire of why NOT to use containers
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:35 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> They certainly do ... That is the only real solution I have 
> ever seen to
> move between OU's. It is still no fun. I do not think he 
> mentioned in there,
> something William has learned the hard way, That the letters 
> DN OU CN and
> all the like are CASE SENSITIVE. So if you do mess with them 
> MAKE sure you
> do not change the case. Else ADC and Exchange migrations will 
> be no fun. Not
> that ADC is ever fun.
> 
> --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond 
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For
> Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:19 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Wow.  Good article.  
> 
> So them MVPs know some stuff, huh?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:10 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > This is the best method I have found
> > http://www.mvps.org/exchange/containermove_frames.htm
> > 
> > --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond 
> http://www.daughtry.ca/
> 
> > For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:08 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> > 
> > 
> > Nope.  Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, delete 
> > the account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then
> > Exmerge the data
> > back in.  This *will* break all existing pointers to the 
> > person (I.e. a
> > person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they 
> > re-address the
> > message)
> > 
> > It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason.
> > 
> > 
> > *
> > * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
> > * Manager, Network Services *
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
> > *
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have created several organizational units on my Exchange 5.5
> > > server. The organizational units divide our users into several
> > Recipients. I would
> > > like to move these email accounts from the Recipients 
> folder to the 
> > > other sub organizational folders. Can this be done?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Making email delete itself

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



That 
guy was one of the vendor weasels at MEC00.  I think the premise is that 
the recipient doesn't get an email, but they get a secured URL which points to 
the message content.  When the sender says so, the message (stored on the 
Disappearing servers) disappears, and subsequent attempts to read the message 
yield a 404.  
 
I 
asked the guy at the weasel booth "why can't I just copy and paste out of 
IE?"
 
He 
didn't have an answer.  

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 
  2002 2:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Making email delete itself
  Interesting app... 
  I am assuming there are options to SAVE mail you don't want to 
  go poof? 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:51 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: Making email delete itself 
  Yes. It's called disappearing email: 
   
  http://www.disappearing.com 
  Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC 
  AVIEN Charter Member "Who's 
  watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 
    
  301-610-9584 voice   240-465-0323 
  Efax 
  The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed 
  by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary 
  and privileged information and shall not be disclosed 
  or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:44 PM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Making email delete 
  itself 
   
  My CEO has been told by a colleague that there is an Outlook 
  2000 add-on that will remove messages past a preset 
  expiration date, no matter where the message has been 
  sent.  He's getting info on the name of this application at 
  my request.  Has anyone ever heard of an app that will 
  actually do this? 
   
  TIA, 
  Eric Holliday 
  Exchange Administrator 
  Corporate Information Systems 
  Logistics Management Institute 
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   
   
    _  
  "Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we 
  will" 
   
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Making email delete itself

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



The 
same lawyers who are writing these ridickerous disclaimers appended to 
everyone's messages?

  
  -Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 
  2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Making 
  email delete itself
  
  Consider legal 
  implications as well.  Once an e-mail leaves your corporate e-mail 
  system, it no longer belongs to your company.  Trying to enforce a policy 
  like this to everyone outside your company doesn't sound like it would bode 
  too well with the legal community.  You should do some serious checking 
  with your legal folks to find out if something like this (I still think it is 
  not possible to do anyway) would be legal.  If not, all it would take is 
  another company to get a whiff of what you were doing, and they would slap you 
  with a huge lawsuit.
   
  
  Ben Winzenz, 
  MCSE
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator
  Peregrine 
  Systems
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: HOLLIDAY, 
  Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:08 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Making 
  email delete itself
   
  
  Ben.  
  I'm with you.  Really.  I tried to tell him that I didn't think it 
  was a good idea, but I have to find out what I can, 
  regardless.
  
   
  
  
  Eric 
  Holliday
  
  LMI Exchange 
  Administrator
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ben 
Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:53 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Making 
email delete itself
I think you and 
your CEO are both dreaming.  You think there is an app out there that 
will not only control your mail system, but everyone else's mail system in 
the world?  That, in essence, is what you are saying.  Wake 
up.  It's not going to happen.  You can control what is on your 
system, or organization, and that is it.  Now if that is what you were 
referring to, then that's different.  Mailbox Manager from SP4 will 
manage mailboxes and delete items past a certain date.  But that is 
only within your organization, and only on the servers that have implemented 
it.
 

Ben Winzenz, 
MCSE
Network/Systems 
Administrator
Peregrine 
Systems
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:44 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Making 
email delete itself
 

My CEO has been 
told by a colleague that there is an Outlook 2000 add-on that will 
remove messages past a preset expiration date, no matter where the 
message has been sent.  He's getting info on the name of this 
application at my request.  Has anyone ever heard of an app that 
will actually do this?

 

TIA,


Eric 
Holliday

Exchange 
Administrator

Corporate Information 
Systems

Logistics Management 
Institute

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 





"Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. 
Assimilate you, we will" 

 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: DNS

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



What 
problem are you having?  Other than you doing something wrong? 
:0)

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
  12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  DNS
  off 
  topic..
  we have a DNS 
  setup.. say..company.com
   
  we want to create 
  a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control 
  JUST that subdomain.
  im lost.. what am 
  i doing wrong??
   
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange Administrator
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: DNS

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Are 
you talking about delegating permission to AD objects (security/permission 
related and done through ADUC)?
 
Or are 
you talking about delegating a DNS zone to another server (not security related 
and done via the DNS snapin)?
 

I think you may have them confused with each 
other.  Which tool did you use to delegate what to whom?  

 
 
 -Original 
Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS

  i 
  went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a delegation, i cant see 
  how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, nor can ya pull up a 
  properties on it. All you can do it tell it what Server hosts 
  it.
  

-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
DNS
What problem are you having?  Other than you doing something 
wrong? :0)

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
  12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  DNS
  off 
  topic..
  we have a DNS 
  setup.. say..company.com
   
  we want to 
  create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in 
  Australia control JUST that subdomain.
  im lost.. what 
  am i doing wrong??
   
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange 
  Administrator
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: DNS

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Strictly DNS then.
 
There 
is no delegation wizard *in DNS* to do this, so you may first want to check the 
delegation you did before and ensure that you didn't transfer the zone to 
another server.
 
What 
you want is the Security Tab.  Right-click on the au.company.com zone in 
DNS, and select "Properties".  Go to the Security tab.  Modify to your 
heart's content.  
 
Keep 
in mind that the "delegation" you're thinking of and the "delegation" available 
under DNS are two different things ;)

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:57 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  DNS
  Im 
  talking about allowing a defined group of admins rights to the subdomain 
  ONLY.
  DNS 
  is setup as company.com with a subdomain called au. This subdomain is 
  au.company.com. we want Admins in AU to be able to work with the records in 
  au.company.com but not be able to touch anything else in 
  DNS.
  We 
  are win2k native mode.
  
    
    -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:53 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
DNS
Are you talking about delegating permission to AD objects 
(security/permission related and done through ADUC)?
 
Or 
are you talking about delegating a DNS zone to another server (not security 
related and done via the DNS snapin)?
 

I think you may have them 
confused with each other.  Which tool did you use to delegate what to 
whom?  
 
 
 -Original 
Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS

  i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a 
  delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, 
  nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it tell it what 
  Server hosts it.
  

    -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
DNS
What problem are you having?  Other than you doing something 
wrong? :0)

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: DNS
  off 
  topic..
  we have a 
  DNS setup.. say..company.com
   
  we want to 
  create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in 
  Australia control JUST that subdomain.
  im lost.. 
  what am i doing wrong??
   
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland 
  Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 
  60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange 
  Administrator
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: DNS

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Hmmm.  You're right.  I just created a new domain under my 
existing zone and could not find a properties tab.  The security settings 
and permissions are applied per zone and apply to all domains in that 
zone.  
 
What 
should work is creating another zone separate from the company.com zone.  
(separating zones does not change anything about the relationship between the 
zones nor does it affect the AD domain hierarchy).  
 
Once 
you create the au.company.com zone you should be able to set its permissions 
appropriately.  

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:06 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  DNS
  Its 
  not a zone. au.company.com is not a zone.
  we 
  have one zone company.com
  in 
  THAT zone there is a subdomain called au
  

-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:05 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
DNS
Strictly DNS then.
 
There is no delegation wizard *in DNS* to do this, so you may first 
want to check the delegation you did before and ensure that you didn't 
transfer the zone to another server.
 
What you want is the Security Tab.  Right-click on the 
au.company.com zone in DNS, and select "Properties".  Go to the 
Security tab.  Modify to your heart's content.  

 
Keep in mind that the "delegation" you're thinking of and the 
"delegation" available under DNS are two different things 
;)

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
  3:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  DNS
  Im talking about allowing a defined group of admins rights to the 
  subdomain ONLY.
  DNS is setup as company.com with a subdomain called au. This 
  subdomain is au.company.com. we want Admins in AU to be able to work with 
  the records in au.company.com but not be able to touch anything else in 
  DNS.
  We are win2k native mode.
  
    
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:53 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
DNS
Are you talking about delegating permission to AD objects 
(security/permission related and done through ADUC)?
 
Or are you talking about delegating a DNS zone to another server 
(not security related and done via the DNS snapin)?
 

I think you may have them 
confused with each other.  Which tool did you use to delegate what 
to whom?  
 
 
 -Original 
Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
DNS

  i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a 
  delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that 
  delegation, nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it 
  tell it what Server hosts it.
  
    
-Original Message-From: Erik 
Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 
2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: DNS
What problem are you having?  Other than you doing 
something wrong? :0)

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 
  2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: DNS
  off 
  topic..
  we 
  have a DNS setup.. say..company.com
   
  we 
  want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the 
  Admins in Australia control JUST that 
  subdomain.
  im 
  lost.. what am i doing wrong??
   
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland 
  Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 
  60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange 
  Administrator
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter

RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Yo.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  April 10, 2002 4:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server 
  necessary?
  Word Bizatch!! 
  The Exmerge is in the hizouse!!
  

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
1:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is 
virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
No, I chose not to, I loved shutting down MTA's and servers to run 
Exmerge.  ;o)
 
 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server 
  necessary?
  Did you 
  have AV on your Exch server
  

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 
2002 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server 
necessary?
Used to live a few blocks from there...
 
 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Paul 
  Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 
  2002 4:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server 
  necessary?
  Anything between 156th and E. Lake Sammamish/Fall City 
  Road???   Heheh
   -Original 
  Message-From: Clayton 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Wednesday, April 
  10, 2002 1:17 PMPosted To: Exchange 2000 
  ServerConversation: Is virus protection on the Exchange 
  server necessary?Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the 
  Exchange server necessary?
  
lives in Redmond?

  -Original Message-From: 
  William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 
  4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server 
  necessary?
  What is a 'Microsoft resident'?  Is 
  that some form of internship?
  
-Original Message-From: 
Micciche, Robert 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the 
Exchange server necessary?
I think it's ridiculous.  
-Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server 
necessary? 
Our environment has Trend running on the 
firewall for anti-virus and content filtering.  We have NAV 
running on the desktops.  We are currently evaluating 
Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers 
(including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN).  However, our 
Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers 
themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and 
instability (particularly Symantec's product).  He said 
that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a 
quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out 
virus defs using the AV product.
With AV software on the firewall and on the 
desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the 
Exchange servers themselves?
-- Matt Lathrum 
General Dynamics Decision 
Systems    
 
When cryptography is outlawed,  
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
---Incoming mail is certi

RE: Outlook Blockers

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



If 
you're using Exchange, you can.  Read the whitepaper on the file blocking 
features and it tells you how to set up a public folder that will let you 
restrict based on username.  
 
You 
can also muck with the Registry in 2002, but we've just used the 
PF.
 

** Erik Sojka, MOS, 
MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
** 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 
  2002 9:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 
  Blockers
  
  Is there a way to adjust the level 
  one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users 
  this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need 
  to just keep zipping everything?
   
  Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, 
  A+
  Network Engineer and Exchange 
  Administrator
  SARMA
  1801 Broadway
  San Antonio, 
  TX 78215
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Blockers

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



I 
couldn't find the whitepaper, but the info seems to have been supplanted by a 
series of links and KB articles.  
 
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/Out2ksec.aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q263296
 
You 
install the OL98/2K security enhancement, and it will block all Level 1 
attachments by default.  If you have Exchange, you can set a flag in the 
Registry that instructs the OL security update to look for a special PF that 
will override the default settings.  The PF doesn't receive the 
attachments, but is a custom-developed form that contains the settings.  OL 
checks the PF, and uses the administrator-controlled settings to derive a 
customized Level-1 and Level-2 list.  
 

** Erik Sojka, MOS, 
MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
** 

  
  -Original Message-From: Thompson, 
  Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 
  2002 10:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Outlook Blockers
  ok, i will 
  bite.  do you setup the public folder to recieve the messages? how does 
  that work???
   
  
  Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville 410-869-1141 
  
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:57 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
Blockers
If 
you're using Exchange, you can.  Read the whitepaper on the file 
blocking features and it tells you how to set up a public folder that will 
let you restrict based on username.  
 
You can also muck with the Registry in 2002, but we've just used the 
PF.
 

****** Erik Sojka, MOS, 
MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
** 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 
  11, 2002 9:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Outlook Blockers
  
  Is there a way to adjust the 
  level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For 
  normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc 
  files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything?
   
  Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, 
  A+
  Network Engineer and Exchange 
  Administrator
  SARMA
  1801 
Broadway
  San Antonio, 
  TX 
  78215
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.

[Erik Sojka]

That's why you're not an MVP.

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:48 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
> 
> 
> Never saw that before. Excellent...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:41 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
> 
> 
> It does a lot.
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051
> 
> William
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
> 
> 
> Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference.  I 
> thought it
> only went on number of mailboxes?  Is it smart enough to look 
> at current
> sizes and allocate resources based on that data.  Just 
> wondering for future
> reference.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tom
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
> 
> Good call.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
> 
> 
> Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevan Dickinson 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
> 
> 
> Last Weekend
> 
> I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 
> Compaq Server. 
> 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive.
> It much more powerful than the old box.
> 
> I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them 
> back into the new
> set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new 
> Exchange Server.
> 
> Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 
> Win 2k Servers
> doing various jobs.
> 
> All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro.
> 
> However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email 
> with attachments
> both internal and external.
> 
> It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with 
> an attachment.
> What have I missed during my migration??
> 
> 
> 
> Kevan Dickinson
> Network Engineer
> Oxford Natural Products Plc
> The Stable Block
> Cornbury Park
> Charlbury
> Oxfordshire
> OX7 3EH
> 
> Tel:  +44 1608 813300
> Dir:  +44 1608 81
> Fax: +44 1608 813301
> 
www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com
Company No: 3554809



*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: all minus one

[Erik Sojka]

I don't know of any way to do that, other than manually creating and
maintaining an "Everybody but William" DL.

> -Original Message-
> From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: all minus one
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> Is there a way to send mail to distribution list "all" but 
> excluding one or two
> people?
> I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate.
> 
> Thanks
> Mal
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: all minus one

[Erik Sojka]

As long as the recipients are on the same server, then yes.  

The DL gets expanded to the individual recipients before the message gets
sent, so SIS is retained whether a DL is used or not. 

> -Original Message-
> From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: all minus one
> 
> 
> 
> I have an other question attached to this. I understand when 
> a mail is sent to a
> DL, it will be a single instance storage. When you select so 
> many users, will
> this still be a single instance storage?
> 
> Thanks
> Mal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: all minus one
> 
> 
> Never even thought of that - cool!  Plus, you could add them 
> as bcc's so that
> people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required.
> 
> -- 
> Matt Lathrum
> General Dynamics Decision Systems
>  When cryptography is outlawed,
>  bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: all minus one
> 
> Wow! Cool!!!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: all minus one
> 
> 
> New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click 
> Properties. Select names,
> minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left).
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: all minus one
> 
> 
> Thank you sirs. I got it. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: all minus one
> 
> 
> If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the 
> DL, send the
> mail, then put em back...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: all minus one
> 
> 
> That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange.  :o|
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: all minus one
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> Is there a way to send mail to distribution list "all" but 
> excluding one or
> two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything
> appropriate.
> 
> Thanks
> Mal
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen Content Filter

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



*tener*
*hanji*
*avi*

  
  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 
  2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Antigen Content Filter
  Nothing makes my 
  day like adding entries like this:
   
  * Britney 
  *
  * 
  anna*
  * Free 
  *
  * Fun* 
  *
  * sexy 
  *
   
  So many sad end 
  users...
  So many happy 
  admins...
   
  Has anyone come up 
  with an official "Martin Blackstone Content Filter List" 
  yet?
   
   
  Robert 
  Micciche
  IT Operations 
  Manager
  MCP, MCP+I, CCNA, 
  MCSE
  Cooper 
  Wiring Devices
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.cooperwiringdevices.com
   
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Checking white space size of database

[Erik Sojka]

He?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 8:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
> 
> 
> Yea. He didn't like that answer. He wanted a different one.
> Make something up.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
> 
> 
> The same way I answered you on Friday, April 19th.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brenda Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 6:43 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Checking white space size of database
> 
> 
> Hi:
> Can anyone tell me how we can check to see how much white 
> space is in our
> Exchange Database?  We are runing Exchange 5.5 with sp4.  Thank you
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user

[Erik Sojka]

Can you ping it from a moat?
Can you ping it in a boat?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 
> server when set ting up a new user
> 
> 
> Can you ping the server by name? Can you ping the server by 
> IP? Can you ping
> any other servers by name?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:09 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server 
> when setting
> up a new user
> 
> 
> I am having a problem resolving the name of an exchange 
> server on a newly
> added computer.
> * Exchange server is 5.5 SP4.
> * The Exchange server is runing on W2k with the latest service packs.
> * If I log onto the new user directly on the Exchange server 
> box I can use
> outlook 2000 and specify the Exchange server name and the 
> mailbox name for
> the user and it works fine.
> * if I go to the new user's machine and attempt to set up the 
> server access
> I.E. type in the name and use the check name button the 
> server is not found.
> * The new user's machine is joined to the domain where the 
> exchange server
> resides.
> * Even if I log on asa domain  administrator on the new 
> machine and try and
> resolve the Exchange server name it is not found.
> * I tried the removal of the TCP/IP protocol which is noted 
> in the Microsoft
> knowledge base and then re adding it again. THis did not 
> solve the problem.
> 
> * I can access and use domain resources from the new machine.
> * What is the problem?
> Kevin Fjelsted
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user

[Erik Sojka]

What about the boat?

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:47 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 
> server when set ting up a new user
> 
> 
> Yes I can ping the server both by name and address from the machine in
> question.
> Kevin
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]

[Erik Sojka]

Cabal is a nonsense word, which doesn't exist in any known language, which
describes something which doesn't exist.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:31 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> 
> 
> WTH is a cabal? Is that anything like a caBOWL? heh
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:15 PM
> Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> 
> 
> I know "nothing" of the cabal which does not exist!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:57 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> 
> 
> There is however the secret cabal which does not exist
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:43 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> 
> 
> The moderator here is the same as the other lists as far as I 
> know and that
> would be Stu...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> 
> 
> 
> Actually, all 3 Sunbelt lists (Exchange Admin, Mac-NT & AlphaNT)
> have a similar charter.
> 
> By the way, who *is* the moderator over here, anyway?
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Subject: Re: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
> >HACKED!]
> >
> >
> >Sorry, I didn't know this was the Mac-NT & AlphaNT list. I must have 
> >misposted.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Dan Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:31 AM
> >Subject: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> >
> >
> >
> >Guys,
> >
> >We have a rule over in the Mac-NT & AlphaNT lists here on the Sunbelt
> >site: When going off topic, change the SUBJECT line.
> >
> >It makes life easier for those of us who actually NEED the info!
> >
> >Cheers!
> >Dan
> >Mac-NT & AlphaNT list moderator
> >
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

[Erik Sojka]

LOL!

> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:12 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> 
> 
> 
> Hey Dan!  You never did get back to Ed Woodrick on this list all those
> years ago as to why Exchange uses an Access database as an engine
> format!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 16 July 2002 15:55
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> 
> 
> 
>   OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses,
> besides 25 & 110?
> 
>   Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply click
> on:
>  ntlog.zip>
> [This is a new link & new file from the one previously posted by me.]
> 
>   Cheers!
>   Dan
> 
> "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
>   We don't believe this to be a coincidence." (Jeremy S. Anderson)
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:36 AM
> >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> >
> >
> >U...  Telneting to the server alone does NOT mean the 
> server is an 
> >open relay...  I can telnet port 25 to any server in the world, that 
> >doesn't mean I can relay mail...
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:38 AM
> >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> >
> >
> >Actually, no.. if you can telnet to the mail server you can 
> relay. No 
> >hacking needed. This is by the very nature of exchange. I would 
> >recommend looking at not allowing characters like %$! Through your 
> >firewall. Here's a link to check to see if you have an open relay..
> >
> >http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Joe Irvine
> > -Original Message-
> >From:Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent:Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:30 AM
> >To:  MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> >Importance:  Low
> >
> >
> > Look at the 4031 error messages, which indicate SOMEONE is
> trying to 
> >relay through the server, and since unauthorized relaying is 
> prohibited
> 
> >that tells me someone has hacked in.
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:03 AM
> >>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> >>
> >>
> >>Then it's sorta in production then, yes?
> >>
> >>Was there a concern other than the 4318's?
> >>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:55 PM
> >>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yes, it's connected, and the DNS servers have been pointed at it
> for
> >about a week...
> >>
> 
> ---
> This attachment has been scanned for hostile code:
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> *
> This email and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential and intended solely for the use of 
> the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
> or opinions presented are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of 
> Silversands.
> 
> If you have received this email in error, please  
> contact our Support Desk immediately on 
> 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]

[Erik Sojka]

Didn't you get the minutes from the last meeting?  *There is no cabal*!

> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:08 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> server HACKED!]
> 
> 
> Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary disagrees:
> 
> Main Entry: 1 ca·bal  
> Pronunciation: k&-'bäl, -'bal
> Function: noun
> Etymology: French cabale cabala, intrigue, cabal, from 
> Medieval Latin cabbala cabala, from Late Hebrew qabbAlAh, 
> literally, received (lore)
> Date: 1614
> : the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly 
> united to bring about an overturn or usurpation especially in 
> public affairs; also : a group engaged in such artifices and intrigues
> 
> Main Entry: 2 cabal
> Function: intransitive verb
> Inflected Form(s): ca·balled; ca·bal·ling
> Date: 1680
> : to unite in or form a cabal 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 01:01 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 
> > server HACKED!]
> > 
> > 
> > Cabal is a nonsense word, which doesn't exist in any known 
> > language, which describes something which doesn't exist.  
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Looking cool isn't enough of an excuse?

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
  HACKED!
  

  Now I don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my 
  email.
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
:)  I even changed the colorsI didn't 
want to continue to blind others..;)

Sherry 
Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration 
Team Information Technology 
"With sufficient 
thrust, pigs fly just fine." 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  July 17, 2002 9:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
  HACKED!
  LOL!!! great foof.
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 
2002 8:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
HACKED!
Okay, I'll have to accept the label of "Foof 
Queen".  Well at least I have some "official" letters to put 
behind my name now...  
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data 
Center Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine." 
-Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:54 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
That is Insolence. We have all come to respect each 
other and abuse is part of that.  Ask the Foof Queen from 
yesterday. ;-)
-Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
Why would I do that?  I'd like you to use your 
knowledge to assist new users, rather than call them trolls or put 
in a cryptic message about "it's been two weeks".  I don't care 
whether you're happy or sad about it.  I'm new here, and I 
didn't know that part of the list charter was to denigrate 
less-experienced admins rather than answer their 
question.
> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
> > > That is not nice Don. > 
> If he is trying to make me feel 
badhe failed. > > - Original Message - > From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:21 AM > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
> > > Figures! > > -Original Message- > 
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
> > > Sorry, I don't get it > 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Tom Meunier" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:11 AM > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
> > > This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear 
that > Matthew will flame me, and then 
say "How about [repost of the > FAQ link 
that I had just posted]?". > 
> I'll look at your logs, since that's 
NOT a FAQ. > > 
> -Original Message- > > 
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 
AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
server HACKED! > > > > > > > > OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 
5.5 > > uses, besides 25 & 
110? > > > 
> Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply click 
on: > >  > ntlog.zip> > > [This is a new link & new file from the one 
previously > posted by me.] 
> > > > 
   

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Can 
you open my milk, mommy?

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 
  2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
  Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
  I have never seen this guy before. How are we to 
  know that they are "MS-Exchange Admin" staff? I thought this list was self 
  moderated? I feel like I am in Romper Room sometimes, and have been told to 
  'settle down'.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:52 
AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
HACKED!

I 
don't have to try to be clever - I have a proven track 
record.

  -Original Message-From: Szalkiewicz, Toni 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 17 July 2002 
  16:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
  This resource is not for showing off, please keep the 
  comments relevant to the issues and do not "pad-out" the thread by trying 
  to be clever !
   
  Thank you for your corporation in this 
  matter
   
  MS-Exchange Admin 
  Staff 
  

-Original Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 
2002 16:03To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I'm always thinking of others so, here's a 
little reason for you to wear your sunglasses ;)

Sherry 
Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information 
Technology "With 
sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
-Original 
Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
HACKED!

  Now I don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my 
  email.
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 
2002 8:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
HACKED!
:)  I even changed the colorsI 
didn't want to continue to blind others..;)

Sherry 
Abercrombie - FQ Data Center 
Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just 
fine." 

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Eldridge, Dave 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 
  2002 9:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
  HACKED!
  LOL!!! great foof.
  
-Original Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server 
HACKED!
Okay, I'll have to accept the label of "Foof 
Queen".  Well at least I have some "official" letters to 
put behind my name now...  
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With 
sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
-Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:54 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 

That is Insolence. We have all come to respect 
each other and abuse is part of that.  Ask the Foof Queen 
from yesterday. ;-)
-Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
Why would I do that?  I'd like you to use 
your knowledge to assist new users, rather than call them trolls 
or put in a cryptic message about "it's been two weeks".  I 
don't care whether you're happy or sad about it.  I'm new 
here, and I didn't know that part of the list charter was to 
denigrate less-experienced admins rather than answer their 
question.
> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 
AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5

RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise

[Erik Sojka]

If you translate "Crooked Pudding Supplier" into British English, the
letters spell out "LES".

It's also known to refer to chaps who hang around with orange bouncy
characters, such as the bloke at www.tiggercam.co.uk

> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:33 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> OK. I'll take the bait for the great amusement of all.
> What's ?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> ::snickering::
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:23 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> 
> Mutter.
> 
> 
> Thanks, Don.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:13 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> E5.5 Enterprise only is available by purchasing E2K 
> Enterprise.  They come
> on separate CD's in the same box...  Clear enough for ya?  :o)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> Don would you please clarify. Does 5.5 Enterprise come on its 
> own CD as part
> of the media pack of E2K or are you stating that you can 
> still purchase 5.5
> Enterprise independently of E2K. Thanks.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> 5.5 Enterprise comes on a CD of its own...  :P
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> I believe that is fiction.
> 
> 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Enterprise CD, though.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> 
> 
> I'm trying to get a straight answer on this one. My MS 
> reseller seems to be
> confused on this. Currently have Exchange 5.5 Standard and 
> would like to
> move to 5.5 Enterprise. I've searched the list archives. I 
> thought I read
> here that 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Standard CD. Is this fact or
> fiction? Thanks.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mac Clients

[Erik Sojka]

Dan will follow up with an answer to this question in a few months.  It will
probably be in another unrelated thread, though.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:22 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Mac Clients
> 
> 
> We're using Windows 2000 and Exchange 5.5 and I have a few 
> Mac OS X users.
> What native OS X clients are out there for Exchange?  Using emulation
> Outlook:mac 2001 is crashing.  Any hopes of getting a native 
> OS X client for
> Exchange?
> 
> ---
> Ken Leyba
> Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> California State University Dominguez Hills
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client

[Erik Sojka]

Sweet sweet love.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
> 
> 
> Oh?  What are we making?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
> 
> 
> That's great. But we are not making stir fry here.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
> 
> 
> Nope, mine woks like a champ without any problems...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David Elebute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
> 
> 
> I have set the MTU to 1400 and went back to V. 3.5.1 E, and in the
> VPNClient.ini file added OutlookNotify=1; but still getting the same
> results. Is there anything else that anyone else has seen 
> concerning this
> topic?
> 
> David Elebute
> Director of MIS
> SuperClubs
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:37 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
> 
> Check your MTU settings...  They should be at 1400 for best results...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David Elebute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:17 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
> 
> 
> Has anyone experienced the synchronization problem w/Outlook 2000 and
> Cisco's VPN client V 3.5.2 C? It is hanging up attempting to 
> synchronize
> with our Exchange 5.5 Servers. Cisco delivered a "fix"; add 
> OutlookNotify=1
> to VPNClient.ini file in the program installation directory, 
> but I tried it
> and still did not solve the problem. Besides upgrading to 
> Outlook 2002, has
> anyone been able resolve this problem? All responses are greatly
> appreciated.   
> 
> David Elebute
> Director of MIS
> SuperClubs
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: team calendar

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Can 
you post yours here?

  
  -Original Message-From: Chris Peden 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 
  1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team 
  calendar
  i 
  used to use it on an exchange serveryou will have to read the docs for it, 
  its simple to setup but involves a webserver, its almost like a webapp that 
  accesses exchange
   
   
  
  Thanks,
  -Chris-
  IT Director
  Sundowner 
  Interiors
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 
11:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team 
calendar
i 
think i have that, but how do i use it.. i installed it, but I dont see much 
more.. 
if 
its useful only for pst files, or net folders.. we dont use 
those.

  
  -Original Message-From: Chris Peden 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 
  2002 11:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: team calendar
  there is an awesome one that MS made, and its free...search the 
  msdn for "Outlook Team Calendars" i believe its version 
  2.0d
   
   
  
  Thanks,
  -Chris-
  IT Director
  Sundowner 
  Interiors
  

-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
July 24, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: team calendar
Please help 
me out..
ive just 
gotten my first request for a team calendar..
how can i 
set this up with e 5.5 sp4 and outlook 2000 ?List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OOO of the Day

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Who?  Matt?

  
  -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:33 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OOO of the 
  Day
  Hahahaha... I love the arrogance of idiots... someone really needs to 
  teach the guy a lesson.
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:30 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OOO of the 
Day
LOL that is too funny. Let's all email him and 
tell him to either remove the OOO or pause his list service... LIKE AN 
ADULT

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Garland Mac Neill 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:06 
  AM
  Subject: RE: OOO of the Day
  
  
  Damn, I missed 
  that one. 
   
  Of course that 
  would because someone deleted the transaction logs from the MDBDATA 
  folder. Doing a hard reset is a painful thing. Wait until I get a hold of 
  my mini me.
   
  I apologize...long 
  night. 
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:03 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: OOO of 
  the Day
   
  Snip 
  
  I am currently out of 
  the office and will not be checking email until I return on Monday, July 
  29th.  Please contact Bob Mcwilliamfor pressing 
  issues.
  If you receive this 
  from posting to a listserver, please (really) don't tell me to turn it 
  off.  Time to act like an adult.
  Dan 
  
  'scuse me, but we act like 
  adults all the time don't we? 
  Who's Bob Mcwilliamfor & 
  how do we contact him?  
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie - FQ Data 
  Center Administration Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  List Charter and 
  FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MDBDATA folder

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



I also 
take a full bump every night.  I sometimes don't get the cleaning process 
right, though.  

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 
  2002 12:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  MDBDATA folder
  I 
  always do nightly full.  It makes the restore process cleaner, 
  too.
   
  

-Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 
9:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
MDBDATA folder

Legato and it's set to do a once a week full backup and daily incrementals. For some reason I was under the impression 
that this log files cleared themselves after a preset 24 hour period. So now 
that I have been set straight, I shall change the backup schedule to a 
nightly full. 
 
-Original 
Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 
2002 9:47 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: MDBDATA 
folder
 

If circular 
logging is off, then the system will continue to write logs until it is 
either backed up properly with an Exchange aware backup program, or in your 
case until the disk is full.

 

What are you 
backing up with?
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 
  2002 
  8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: MDBDATA 
  folder
  Hopefully someone 
  can answer this, I didn't have much luck on Google or Technet. On my E2K 
  server, the MDBDATA folder keeps filling up with transaction logs and 
  fills the up the disk instead of overwriting them to the point of shutting 
  down the MTA service.  
  Circular logging is not enabled and I can't find any reason why 
  they are not being overwritten. Anyone else seen 
  this?
   
  Thanks 
  
   
  Garland Mac 
  Neill
  Systems 
  Administrator
  Solbourne 
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
   
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by 
AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.380 / Virus 
Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by 
  AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.380 / Virus 
  Database: 213 - Release Date: 
7/24/2002
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MDBDATA folder

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



mutter.  
 
s/bump/dump

  
  -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:34 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MDBDATA 
  folder
  I 
  also take a full bump every night.  I sometimes don't get the cleaning 
  process right, though.  
  

-Original Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
29, 2002 12:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: MDBDATA folder
I 
always do nightly full.  It makes the restore process cleaner, 
too.
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 
  2002 9:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  MDBDATA folder
  
  Legato and it's set to do a once a week full backup and daily 
  incrementals. For some reason I was under the 
  impression that this log files cleared themselves after a preset 24 hour 
  period. So now that I have been set straight, I shall change the backup 
  schedule to a nightly full. 
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 
  2002 9:47 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  MDBDATA folder
   
  
  If circular 
  logging is off, then the system will continue to write logs until it is 
  either backed up properly with an Exchange aware backup program, or in 
  your case until the disk is full.
  
   
  
  What are you 
  backing up with?
  
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 
2002 
8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: MDBDATA 
folder
Hopefully 
someone can answer this, I didn't have much luck on Google or Technet. 
On my E2K server, the MDBDATA folder keeps filling up with transaction 
logs and fills the up the disk instead of overwriting them to the point 
of shutting down the MTA service.  
Circular logging is not enabled and I can't find any reason why 
they are not being overwritten. Anyone else seen 
this?
 
Thanks 

 
Garland Mac 
Neill
Systems 
Administrator
Solbourne 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked 
  by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.380 / 
  Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 
7/24/2002List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by 
AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.380 / Virus 
Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: domain

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



That's 
a wide open question.  Are you talking for an internal network or just for 
a DMZ deployment?
 
A box 
in the DMZ should be in its own separate thing (domain or WG, doesn't matter 
which).  If that box gets compromised, then the damage is only limited to 
that box.  The attacker doesn't also get access to the production domain or 
any other DMZ boxes.  

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:17 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  domain
  Can anyone settle 
  a bet?
   
  I have a coworker 
  who is saying a workgroup is more secure than a domain, I say its the otherway 
  around.
  He is also betting 
  me that any servers setup in your DMZ should be setup in workgoups and not 
  domains...List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: brain dead:header info

[Erik Sojka]

Open the message, then select Options from the View menu.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: brain dead:header info
> 
> 
> ok. I am brain dead today. I have forgotten how to view the 
> header info from
> outlook 2000. Can someone throw me a bone and remind me?
> 
> thanks
> 
> Liz
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: domain

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



True;  I only meant that the attacker doesn't get default or 
passthru access to other boxes, as one might if all boxes were in the same 
domain.

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:15 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  domain
  "If 
  that box gets compromised, then the damage is only limited to that 
  box. "
   
  Not 
  necessarily...  
   
  

-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:19 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
domain
That's a wide open question.  Are you talking for an internal 
network or just for a DMZ deployment?
 
A 
box in the DMZ should be in its own separate thing (domain or WG, doesn't 
matter which).  If that box gets compromised, then the damage is only 
limited to that box.  The attacker doesn't also get access to the 
production domain or any other DMZ boxes.  

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 
  11:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  domain
  Can anyone 
  settle a bet?
   
  I have a 
  coworker who is saying a workgroup is more secure than a domain, I say its 
  the otherway around.
  He is also 
  betting me that any servers setup in your DMZ should be setup in workgoups 
  and not domains...List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Large attachments / Emails vanishing

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Do you 
have delivery restrictions on the IMC?

  
  -Original Message-From: Craig Sterley 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:26 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Large attachments 
  / Emails vanishing
  We have an Exchange 5.5 server sp4 running on NT4 
  sp6a the seems to be losing emails that are large in size( haven't determined 
  exact size yet - seem to fluctuate).  There is nothing in the event 
  viewer indicating an error, the file is gone from the queue on the exchange 
  server and it never gets to where it is suppose to go.  
  Any ideas on this??? List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: ESEUTIL

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



DB 
Maintenance and a defrag run automatically every night (check your logs for 
Event 1221).  Any whitespace recovered from either the auto defrag or 
running ESEUTIL will be used again very shortly through normal server use.  

 
The 
space recovered (which again will get used again) do *not* balance the out 
downtime required to run the tool, and the potential to seriously corrupt your 
Store.

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 
  2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  ESEUTIL
  
  Seriously?
   
  This server has been 
  up for 4 years, and I am pretty sure it has never been run. Does it fragment 
  like a normal hard drive on a workstation or server would, which needs regular 
  maintenance?
   
  Exch 5.5 
  SP4
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:38 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  ESEUTIL
   
  
  Only 
  when necessary?  
  
  Only 
  during DR procedures?
  
  Only 
  under direction of PSS?
  
  Only if 
  you're encountering the 16GB DB limit in the Standard 
  version?
  
-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:41 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: 
ESEUTIL
What is the recommended calendar 
for using this defrag tool?
 
Once a month? 
Twice a year?
Once a decade?
 
 
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Testing exmerge

[Erik Sojka]

Are you using an Alpha version on your Intel server or vice versa?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Testing exmerge
> 
> 
> I am receiving the following error when I start exmerge...
> "The image file c:\exmerge\ExMerge.exe is valid, but is 
> for a machine
> type other than the current machine." Any ideas? Exchange 5.5 
> SP4 Winnt4.0
> SP6a 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Steve
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Ethernet cable

[Erik Sojka]

I do it randomly for fun just to fsck with the users.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:31 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Ethernet cable
> 
> 
> We do this all the time with our 5.5 server.  No issues yet.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Ethernet cable
> 
> 
> We need to do some work on the Ethernet wires that connect to 
> Exchange. 
> Should there be an issue with simply unplugging the cable, 
> rerunning it
> and plugging it back in without shutting down the services?  I realize
> that the users will not be able to connect while it is unplugged but
> downtime is much less with just unplug and replug than shutdown and
> restart.  I want to make sure that I do not cause an issue 
> with Exchange
> itself.  NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5 (with IMS)
> Thank you,
> John
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



No 
sleep, no days off ever again (at least for the next 18 
years).

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 
  9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
  Friday!!
  
  I don't get 
  it
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
  Friday!!
   
  
  I have a 
  baby
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: It's 
Friday!!
Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have 
lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a few crullers), Kona Special 
Blend coffee, and I have Monday off.  Three day weekend, yippee!  

It's going to be a GOOD 
day!! 
Sherry 
Abercrombie Data 
Center Administration Team Information 
Technology "With 
sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Lemme 
recap ;)
 
Sherry:  I have donuts today and I have off 
Monday!
Others:  Cool, I wish I had donuts and/or a day 
off.
Martin:  I'll never have a day off again.  But it's still a 
good day because of Rebecca Diane Blackstone.  
 
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 
  9:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
  Friday!!
  
  I have one too, but 
  am lucky. She has slept a minimum of 8 hours per since she was 3 weeks. 
  (currently 15 months). I just don't see how that relates to Sherry's original 
  call to Carpe Friday!!
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Erik Sojka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:30 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
  Friday!!
   
  
  No 
  sleep, no days off ever again (at least for the next 18 
  years).
  
-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:27 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
Friday!!
I 
don't get it
 
-Original 
Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: It's 
Friday!!
 

I have 
a baby
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: It's 
  Friday!!
  Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have 
  lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a few crullers), Kona Special 
  Blend coffee, and I have Monday off.  Three day weekend, 
  yippee!  
  It's going to be a GOOD 
  day!! 
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie Data 
  Center Administration Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Stopping the madness

[Erik Sojka]

Disable "Automatic replies to the Internet" on the IMC at the Exchange
server.  

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Stopping the madness
> 
> 
> Does anyone know how to disable Outlook's O_O_Ass_stant's 
> capability to
> automatically forward emails to another address?
> 
> We have had some problems with people setting OOA on and 
> forwarding their
> mail to a "free" mail service.  Some services have 
> restrictions on the size
> of the email they will accept (2MB).  Somebody sends somebody 
> the latest
> goofy MPEG file and it gets forwarded and rejected over and 
> over and, well,
> you know the rest of the story
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Dan Munley
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Can someone settle this....

[Erik Sojka]

Title: Message



Still 
happee!

  
  -Original Message-From: Andy David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:34 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone 
  settle this
  Actually its called called Outlook 2002, but regardless, you'll see 
  that box whether you are on dial-up or the local LAN. Its Microsoft's way 
  of telling you "Im not dead, it just looks that way".
   
   
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone settle 
this
I 
think the info box is new to OXP. O2K was just a slow over a dial up, but no 
info box to let you know.
 
 

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 
  2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can 
  someone settle this
  
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 
  SP6
  Outlook XP and Outlook 
  2000.
   
  My coworker and I are trying 
  to determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we are 
  dialed up on our laptops and connected to our network via an IPSEC VPN 
  connection (same with PPTP), when we connect to Exchange via Outlook XP 
  there are times we get a message that it is requesting information from 
  the server and has a status bar. Under Outlook 2000 there was no 
  information box like that. 
   
  My argument is that under XP, 
  it is telling you that is requesting information and this is normal 
  operation, given that it's working on a dialup. I should clarify, that we 
  get this box when we are trying to open email or change folders. He says 
  this is some kind of error that needs to be 
  resolved.
   
  Can some one shed some light 
  on this. If you need more information please let 
  me know. 
   
  Garland Mac 
  Neill
  Systems 
  Administrator
  Solbourne
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  --The 
  information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
  information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 
  is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
  are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
  message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
  please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, 
  fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the 
  message. Thank 
  you.==
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email

[Erik Sojka]

Can you do it in a boat?

> -Original Message-
> From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> I'm telnetting into port 25 to mail.noblehealth.org (tried IP 
> address also).
> 
> The application is called telnet.
> Can you telnet into your address?
> Can you do it from outside your firewall?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:58 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> How are you trying the telnet? What are you typing and in 
> which application?
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email

[Erik Sojka]

Hey man,  I was drunk and she told me she was a sheep!

> -Original Message-
> From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:11 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> Erik's done it with a goat.
> 
> Don't deny it, I've got pictures.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:09 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> Can you do it in a boat?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:06 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> > 
> > 
> > I'm telnetting into port 25 to mail.noblehealth.org (tried IP
> > address also).
> > 
> > The application is called telnet.
> > Can you telnet into your address?
> > Can you do it from outside your firewall?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:58 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> > 
> > 
> > How are you trying the telnet? What are you typing and in
> > which application?
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email

[Erik Sojka]

Quiet.  We're talking.

> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:12 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> I am connected to an Outside connection on my Laptop. I open Internet
> Explorer, and type in: Telnet://mail.noblehealth.org:25 and when I hit
> enter, it opens up Hyperterminal, which makes the connection, 
> and I see
> data with time and dates pop up, so this tells me that I have 
> successfully
> telneted, isn't that so? or am I doing it wrong?
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email

[Erik Sojka]

Seriously;  

Can you forward the entire string you get upon connection in Hyperterminal?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:18 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> Quiet.  We're talking.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:12 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> > 
> > 
> > I am connected to an Outside connection on my Laptop. I 
> open Internet
> > Explorer, and type in: Telnet://mail.noblehealth.org:25 and 
> when I hit
> > enter, it opens up Hyperterminal, which makes the connection, 
> > and I see
> > data with time and dates pop up, so this tells me that I have 
> > successfully
> > telneted, isn't that so? or am I doing it wrong?
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email

[Erik Sojka]

Do you work for aol?

Are you getting your ISP service from AOL?

> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:32 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
> 
> 
> 220 logs-wa.proxy.aol.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.10.0/8.10.0; Wed, 
> 15 May 2002
> 11:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange CALs.

[Erik Sojka]

Yes you do.  The Exchange CAL lets you connect to a mailbox on the server,
using whatever tools and products you deem necessary.  They just throw in
OL2K as the preferred one.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange CALs.
> 
> 
> Does anyone out there, know if we already Ms Office XP 
> licenses (Outlook
> XP), if we still need to get CALs for Exchange?
> 
> Tapera Doma
> Senior Tech Analyst
> V 404-979-9252
> F 404-589-2610
> E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: lars andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:28 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Outlook Pack Rats
> 
> Our company requires 100% email retention of all pertainant 
> emails.  Our
> inboxes are growing pretty big, around 1gb after a few years. 
> Synchronization is an issue and I know OL wasnt designed to 
> work as a data
> warehouse for email pack rats.  I was wondering how other 
> people deal with
> this issue and what kinds of tools are available to ensure proper
> retention.
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> Lars
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SPAM from this list???

[Erik Sojka]

You don't get off that easily.

You understand why people get upset about spam, right?  It is theft.  Other
people are paying for your advertising in the form of network bandwidth and
disk space.  You get free advertising.



> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: SPAM from this list???
> 
> 
> Ray and Everyone on the list,
>  
> I deeply apologize for the inconvenience.  I am currently 
> working with
> a few people who are members of this list and I was trying to 
> see if my
> organization could provide others with value.  Please delete 
> the mail that
> you got from me and I will not contact you again.  I promise.
>  
> Tom
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm