xorg's "dummy driver" ...

[Marc G. Fournier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


I've been reading on  about it being 
faster (performance wise) to use xorg's dummy video driver, then to use xvfb 
... problem is, I can't seem to find a 'sample xorg.conf' for setting it up ... 
I tried uploading my xorg.conf from my working desktop, and changing Driver to 
dummy, but that didn't seem to work (altho the above FAQ seems to indicate it 
should) ..

Has anyone succeeded in setting this up / running it, that would be willing to 
share their xorg.conf file?

Thanks ...

- 
Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD4DBQFGfgcs4QvfyHIvDvMRAjMAAJ9WJfLUteKTffzYPTVUjnaLSwL97ACXVfjn
uW21eO/qaFjq7HSvMDQDOg==
=AqZr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-06-03 - 2007-06-23

[Dan Langille]

The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical 
examples and how-to guides.  This message is posted weekly
to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people
know what's available on the website.  Before you post a question
here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list 
archives  
and/or The FreeBSD Diary . 


-- 
Dan Langille
BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

GENERIC kernel build fails at ACPI

[Ben Washington-Yule]

6-STABLE. Here's the relative part from the script file.

Thanks.
===

cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE 
-nostdinc -I- 
-I/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../contrib/dev/acpica 
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include 
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq 
-I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g 
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC -mno-align-long-strings 
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 
-ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
-Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline 
-Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall 
-Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c 
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_ec.c
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE 
-nostdinc -I- 
-I/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../contrib/dev/acpica 
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include 
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq 
-I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g 
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC -mno-align-long-strings 
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 
-ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
-Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline 
-Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall 
-Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c 
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c: In 
function `acpi_hpet_table_probe':
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: 
error: `ACPI_TABLE_HPET' undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: 
error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: 
error: for each function it appears in.)
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: 
error: `hpet' undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:96: 
error: `ACPI_SIG_HPET' undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:96: 
warning: passing arg 3 of `AcpiGetTable' from incompatible pointer type
/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:104: 
error: syntax error before ')' token

*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Is the website having a problem?

[Jim Capozzoli]

On 6/23/07, Josef Grosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I've been trying to get to the ports section of the FreeBSD website for the
last half an hour. Is there a problem?


Josef

--
Josef Grosch   | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   Micro$oft free world  | Berkeley, Ca.



I can get there, but if you still can't, try http://www.freshports.org

--
Jim Capozzoli
D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Is the website having a problem?

[Josef Grosch]

I've been trying to get to the ports section of the FreeBSD website for the
last half an hour. Is there a problem?


Josef

-- 
Josef Grosch   | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   Micro$oft free world  | Berkeley, Ca.


pgp7OB0tVzFNz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

problem making gnome-applets

[Blah Blatz]

I'm trying to make /usr/ports/x11/gnome2, and it's failing in 
/usr/ports/x11/gnome-applets.  More specifically, in charpick/help, when it's 
trying to do an xml2po on char-palette.xml.  Here's the interesting part of the 
output:

gmake[3]: Entering directory 
`/usr/ports/x11/gnome-applets/work/gnome-applets-2.18.0/charpick/help'
if ! test -d bg/; then mkdir bg/; fi
case "." in /*) sd=".";; *) sd="../.";;esac; \
if [ -f "C/char-palette.xml" ]; then d="../"; else d="$sd/"; fi; \
(cd bg/ && \
  `which xml2po` -e -p \
"${d}bg/bg.po" \
"${d}C/char-palette.xml" > char-palette.xml.tmp && \
cp char-palette.xml.tmp char-palette.xml && rm -f char-palette.xml.tmp)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
gmake[3]: *** [bg/char-palette.xml] Error 139

There's a python core file in there, so I'm guessing that python is the thing 
that actually exploded.

Anybody have any suggestions?

Thanks in advance for any help.



   
-
You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
 in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Issue with freebsd 6.2 and disk drives

[Matt Juszczak]

Hi all,

My dedicated server company is deploying me a new FreeBSD 6.2 server.  The 
box uses SATA drives, and is an AMD Athlon box.


I was getting the following error flooding my dmesg:

ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=*

so they replaced all the hardware in the box.  Still, with entirely 
different hardware, I am getting the same error:


ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=106848207

The hard drive in the new box is:

ad4: 76319MB  at ata2-master SATA150

Before I start telling them that this new hardware is also bad, I figured 
I would see if there are any known problems/bugs with 6.2, or possibly a 
known compatibility issue with SATA (and maybe if I should ask them to 
switch to IDE).


Thanks all,

Matt


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: NFS Problems/Questions

[Jason Morgan]

On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:46:27PM -0700, Michael Smith wrote:
> Hello Jason:
> 
> On Jun 23, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Jason Morgan wrote:
> 
> >I've been having some trouble with NFS performance for some time and
> >now that class is out, I've had a bit of time to investigate but I'm
> >stuck. Below are the details of my investigation. Hopefully, someone
> >here can give me some advice.
> >
> >The basic problem is that my NFS performance is very slow. Right now,
> >I am connecting two workstations to a NFS server, which has my home
> >directory, etc, mounted. They are connected over a gigabit network
> >(right now with mtu set to 7000, which is supported by all hardware --
> >changing it to 1500 has no effect on performance, which is
> >strange). Each system is running 6.2-RELEASE or -STABLE. Each system
> >is also using the following network card:
> >
> ># ifconfig sk0
> >sk0: flags=8843 mtu 7000
> >options=b
> >inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
> >ether 00:17:9a:bb:05:87
> >media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX  >duplex,flag0,flag1>)
> >status: active
> >
> ># dmesg | grep sk
> >skc0:  port 0xec00-0xecff mem
> >  0xfdff8000-0xfdffbfff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci0
> >skc0: DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter rev. (0x9)
> >sk0:   on skc0
> >sk0:  Ethernet address: 00:17:9a:XX:XX:XX
> >
> >## Server /etc/rc.conf settings
> >
> >rpcbind_enable="YES"
> >rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
> >rpc_statd_enable="YES"
> >nfs_server_enable="YES"
> >nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 12"
> >nfs_bufpackets="32"
> >mountd_flags="-r"
> >
> >
> >## Client /etc/rc.conf settings
> >
> >nfs_client_enable="YES"
> >nfs_bufpackets="32"
> >nfsiod_enable="YES"
> >nfsiod_flags="-n 6"
> >rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
> >rpc_statd_enable="YES"
> >rpcbind_enable="YES"
> >
> >## /etc/exports
> >
> >/usr -alldirs,maproot=root client1 client2
> >
> >
> >For performance benchmarking, I am using dd. Locally from the server,
> >this is a representative result when writing a 1GB file:
> >
> >## Local write test (for an upper-bound on what to expect).
> >
> ># dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
> >1000+0 records in
> >1000+0 records out
> >1048576000 bytes transferred in 19.580184 secs (53552919 bytes/sec)
> >
> >Connecting from a client (both clients get approximately the same
> >results).
> >
> >## Remote connection (UDP), mounted in /etc/fstab as with flags:
> >## rw,-U,-3,-r=32768,-w=32768
> >
> ># dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
> >1000+0 records in
> >1000+0 records out
> >1048576000 bytes transferred in 101.151139 secs (10366428 bytes/sec)
> >
> >## Remote connection (TCP), mounted in /etc/fstab as with flags:
> >## rw,-T,-3,-r=32768,-w=32768
> >
> ># dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
> >1000+0 records in
> >1000+0 records out
> >1048576000 bytes transferred in 59.668585 secs (17573334 bytes/sec)
> >
> >As can be seen above, TCP is much faster than UPD. I have tried many
> >different mount settings and these are the best results I could
> >get. To test whether or not I have having network issues, I
> >transferred the same nfs.dat file via a http connection and got
> >~32MB/sec -- almost 2x the speed of the TCP NFS connection. 32MB/sec
> >is about what I would expect given that my fastest write speed is
> >~50MB/sec.
> >
> >At this point I am stumped. I have tried increasing/changing the
> >number of nfsiod servers as well as nfs_bufpackets. No matter what
> >settings I change, the results are always the same. I get only two
> >errors, first on /var/log/messages on the server I have just begun
> >seeing:
> >
> >Jun 22 21:13:47 crichton routed[666]: sendto(dc1, 224.0.0.2):  
> >Operation not permitted
> >Jun 22 21:13:47 crichton routed[666]: sendto(sk0, 224.0.0.2):  
> >Operation not permitted
> >Jun 22 21:13:50 crichton routed[666]: sendto(dc1, 224.0.0.2):  
> >Operation not permitted
> >Jun 22 21:13:50 crichton routed[666]: sendto(sk0, 224.0.0.2):  
> >Operation not permitted
> >
> >This appeared after I added a route; however, I added the route after
> >many of the tests were done. I get the same results now as before the
> >new route. On one of the clients (the one running 6.2-RELEASE-p1), I
> >also get a nasty error:
> >
> >nfs/tcp clnt: Error 60 reading socket, tearing down TCP connection
> >
> >This cropped up last night after I tweaked some settings. They have
> >now been changed back, but I still get this error. The other client is
> >unaffected.
> >
> >I appreciate any help people can provide on tracking down the
> >issues. Sorry about the long email -- just trying to be thorough. Of
> >course, I've searched the Internet and can't find any clear assistence
> >on these issues.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >~Jason
> >
> We use the following settings on a mail cluster that's pushing about  
> 50 MB/sec sustained.
> 
> 10.211.1.213:/m0/mail/m0nfs  
> rw,tcp,intr,noatime,nfsv3,-w=65536,-r=65536
> 
> # NFS Server
> rpcbind_enable="YES"
> rpc_lockd

Re: Can No Longer Get To Virtual Consoles After -STABLE Update

[Tim Daneliuk]

Norberto Meijome wrote:



#  Xorg 6.8.(2|99.903) - Add "XkbDisable" to be true (for
# console switching).

Option  "XkbDisable""true"


exactly :) as per the other emails I refered, the issue is with Xkb extensions
when you have multiple / altnernative kb layouts


EndSection


at the end of my xorg.conf.
This has fixed the "ctl+alt+" problem.  There may be side
effects, but so far I haven't triggered any of them.



yes, you can't use alternative keyboard layouts and switch between them. there
is a proposed work around (also in the archives) ,but I haven't tested it yet.

cheers,
B


FWIW, I never had to do this with older version of XF86, and even this
change applied to /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf does not remedy the problem
for xorg 7.2 (which otherwise works fine).  I wonder if there is more magic
here yet to be applied ...



Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How do I get libphp5.so back

[Andrew Falanga]

On 6/23/07, Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Run "make config" in /usr/ports/lang/php5, make sure the apache option
is selected.

HTH,
Joe



I found this just before reading this message.  I was reading in
UPDATING on something that wasn't quite related to my problem about
PHP and saw a suggestion to do "make config" before upgrading.  Well,
I decided to try that and sure enough, the Apache module wasn't
selected.

I figure what must have happened was some time ago I did a portupgrade
-a and in that I must have deselected that module from the build and
lost it.  Thanks again.  Everything's working now, even the pgsql
module.

Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How do I get libphp5.so back

[Joe Holden]

Andrew Falanga wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Reinstall php and all modules -- that should fix the problem (based
>> on past experience).
>> -Garrett
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
> 
> Ok, I went to /usr/ports/lang/php5 and did "make install clean".  The
> build went great but then the script bailed saying that a previous
> install was detected and to do a "make deinstall" and then "make
> reinstall".  I did.  However, I still don't have the libphp5.so module
> in /usr/local/libexec/apache.  How do I reinstall this port and make
> this work?
> 
> Andy
> ___
Run "make config" in /usr/ports/lang/php5, make sure the apache option
is selected.

HTH,
Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How do I get libphp5.so back

[Andrew Falanga]

On 6/23/07, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Reinstall php and all modules -- that should fix the problem (based
on past experience).
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"



Ok, I went to /usr/ports/lang/php5 and did "make install clean".  The
build went great but then the script bailed saying that a previous
install was detected and to do a "make deinstall" and then "make
reinstall".  I did.  However, I still don't have the libphp5.so module
in /usr/local/libexec/apache.  How do I reinstall this port and make
this work?

Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How do I get libphp5.so back

[Garrett Cooper]

Andrew Falanga wrote:

Hi,

I'm working on doing some more development on my php and I've just
discovered that somehow the libraries were removed.  It must have been
through a portupgrade I had done recently.  It's been several months
since I've done anything with it and I noticed that the following
lines were commented in my httpd.conf file:

LoadModule php5_modulelibexec/apache/libphp5.so
AddModule mod_php5.c

I uncommented them, but apache won't start now because these files are
to be found.  However, both packages php5 and php5-pgsql are installed
on my system.  How would I get these back?

Andy
   Reinstall php and all modules -- that should fix the problem (based 
on past experience).

-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

How do I get libphp5.so back

[Andrew Falanga]

Hi,

I'm working on doing some more development on my php and I've just
discovered that somehow the libraries were removed.  It must have been
through a portupgrade I had done recently.  It's been several months
since I've done anything with it and I noticed that the following
lines were commented in my httpd.conf file:

LoadModule php5_modulelibexec/apache/libphp5.so
AddModule mod_php5.c

I uncommented them, but apache won't start now because these files are
to be found.  However, both packages php5 and php5-pgsql are installed
on my system.  How would I get these back?

Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: NFS Problems/Questions

[Michael Smith]

Hello Jason:

On Jun 23, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Jason Morgan wrote:


I've been having some trouble with NFS performance for some time and
now that class is out, I've had a bit of time to investigate but I'm
stuck. Below are the details of my investigation. Hopefully, someone
here can give me some advice.

The basic problem is that my NFS performance is very slow. Right now,
I am connecting two workstations to a NFS server, which has my home
directory, etc, mounted. They are connected over a gigabit network
(right now with mtu set to 7000, which is supported by all hardware --
changing it to 1500 has no effect on performance, which is
strange). Each system is running 6.2-RELEASE or -STABLE. Each system
is also using the following network card:

# ifconfig sk0
sk0: flags=8843 mtu 7000
options=b
inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
ether 00:17:9a:bb:05:87
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX duplex,flag0,flag1>)

status: active

# dmesg | grep sk
skc0:  port 0xec00-0xecff mem
  0xfdff8000-0xfdffbfff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci0
skc0: DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter rev. (0x9)
sk0:   on skc0
sk0:  Ethernet address: 00:17:9a:XX:XX:XX

## Server /etc/rc.conf settings

rpcbind_enable="YES"
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 12"
nfs_bufpackets="32"
mountd_flags="-r"


## Client /etc/rc.conf settings

nfs_client_enable="YES"
nfs_bufpackets="32"
nfsiod_enable="YES"
nfsiod_flags="-n 6"
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
rpcbind_enable="YES"

## /etc/exports

/usr -alldirs,maproot=root client1 client2


For performance benchmarking, I am using dd. Locally from the server,
this is a representative result when writing a 1GB file:

## Local write test (for an upper-bound on what to expect).

# dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 19.580184 secs (53552919 bytes/sec)

Connecting from a client (both clients get approximately the same
results).

## Remote connection (UDP), mounted in /etc/fstab as with flags:
## rw,-U,-3,-r=32768,-w=32768

# dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 101.151139 secs (10366428 bytes/sec)

## Remote connection (TCP), mounted in /etc/fstab as with flags:
## rw,-T,-3,-r=32768,-w=32768

# dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 59.668585 secs (17573334 bytes/sec)

As can be seen above, TCP is much faster than UPD. I have tried many
different mount settings and these are the best results I could
get. To test whether or not I have having network issues, I
transferred the same nfs.dat file via a http connection and got
~32MB/sec -- almost 2x the speed of the TCP NFS connection. 32MB/sec
is about what I would expect given that my fastest write speed is
~50MB/sec.

At this point I am stumped. I have tried increasing/changing the
number of nfsiod servers as well as nfs_bufpackets. No matter what
settings I change, the results are always the same. I get only two
errors, first on /var/log/messages on the server I have just begun
seeing:

Jun 22 21:13:47 crichton routed[666]: sendto(dc1, 224.0.0.2):  
Operation not permitted
Jun 22 21:13:47 crichton routed[666]: sendto(sk0, 224.0.0.2):  
Operation not permitted
Jun 22 21:13:50 crichton routed[666]: sendto(dc1, 224.0.0.2):  
Operation not permitted
Jun 22 21:13:50 crichton routed[666]: sendto(sk0, 224.0.0.2):  
Operation not permitted


This appeared after I added a route; however, I added the route after
many of the tests were done. I get the same results now as before the
new route. On one of the clients (the one running 6.2-RELEASE-p1), I
also get a nasty error:

nfs/tcp clnt: Error 60 reading socket, tearing down TCP connection

This cropped up last night after I tweaked some settings. They have
now been changed back, but I still get this error. The other client is
unaffected.

I appreciate any help people can provide on tracking down the
issues. Sorry about the long email -- just trying to be thorough. Of
course, I've searched the Internet and can't find any clear assistence
on these issues.

Cheers,
~Jason

We use the following settings on a mail cluster that's pushing about  
50 MB/sec sustained.


10.211.1.213:/m0/mail/m0nfs  
rw,tcp,intr,noatime,nfsv3,-w=65536,-r=65536


# NFS Server
rpcbind_enable="YES"
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 16 -h 10.211.1.213"
mountd_flags="-r"

I would imagine the larger read/write values above would be fine for  
you as well, given you have Gigabit links.  The 'noatime' setting may  
be problematic depending on your application.  You might want to  
Google specifics on what applications use atime to see if that's a  
good flag for you or not.


I'd love to see your resul

Re: Host a download for FreeBSD

[Tim Daneliuk]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   May I host a download for FreeBSD?
600Kb/s average download speed.




See:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-howto.html
--

Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: What's the best diagnostic utility for wireless signal?

[Jim Capozzoli]

On 6/20/07, Andrew Liles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I use wireless on a FreeBSD 6.1 box in an area of low signal to my
Access Point.
I want to be able to inspect the signal strength/quality so that I may
adjust the antenna to get best results.  What is the best diagnostic to use?

For instance:
wicontrol wi0
produces:
...
Comms quality/signal/noise: [ 28 47 1 ]
dBm Coms Quality:   [ 14 -85 -99 ]
...

but what is "good" or which numbers should I be seeking maximise or
minimise?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Check out net-mgmt/kismet (I believe it is).  That tool is a nice
program to audit wireless networks, and it has some nice stuff about
signal strength as well.

--
Jim Capozzoli
D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS.

[Jim Capozzoli]

On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:25:12PM -0400, Jim Capozzoli wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
> >> for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for /  &
> >/usr and lets
> >> use ZFS for /home
> >
> >ZFS will remain an optional alternative because of the licensing, so
> >UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
> >
> Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS
> for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
> tradition or something. ;)  Why couldn't one make it so you have ZFS
> capability during a FreeBSD install, ZFS licensing isn't that bad is
> it?

It could be done.  At the present time ZFS is not really suitable on
systems without a lot of memory (I'd recommend at least 1GB).  It is
also very hard to tune it to perform well on i386 because of VM and
address space issues.  It might be possible to address these over
time.

Kris



Yeah, but at the rate they're making computers with more and more ram,
probably in 2 years or so a gig of ram will be like what we think of
256 megs today...some people already do regard a gig as not that much
even.  Personally, I have a 1.5 gigs in my machine.

--
Jim Capozzoli
D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Hardware monitor needed

[Jim Capozzoli]

On 6/21/07, Eduardo Viruena Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Laszlo Nagy wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> My FreeBSD 6.2 server restarts suddenly once or twice a day. I believe it is
> because the processor is overheated, but I'm not sure. Is there a way to
> check this from software? I would like to install a hardware monitor program
> that can log out processor temperature in every minute. The mainboard is ASUS
> P5LD2, if that matters. Is there a software out there that can do this for
> me?
>
> Of course I could buy a new processor fan (or a water cooling system) but I
> do not want to spend money before I make sure that is the root of the
> problem.
>
> Thanks,
>
>  Laszlo
>

Believe it or not, my computer had the same behavoir because
it was very dirty.  It took 3 cans of compressed air
to clean it.   Once clean, it worked perfectly.

compressed air? nonsense, I prefer the cleaned-out-reverse-shopvac method ;)


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"



--
Jim Capozzoli
D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: plz help!

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

On 23/06/07, Nitin Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 6/23/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Second, is there some special reason you would want to install
> > the 4.8 version?It is long ago obsolete.   I would suggest
> > installing 6.2-RELEASE unless there is a very good reason to
> > go with 4.8.
> >
>Older laptops for one... :)
>
>(Actually, mine can go to 5.4 ... Once I try 5.5, it
> locks up on the ata1 probe)
>
>Tuc/TBOH

Actually, I have a older pc which was puted in store. on that pc the
BSD 4.8is installed.
now i want to connect this pc in my lan.



man 8 ifconfig
Also
man 5 rc.conf
Although, you could just issue /stand/sysinstall
and under "post install configuration" find "configure
additional network interfaces".

--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: gimp error

[Tsu-Fan Cheng]

yep! that works!!

thanks!!

TFC

On 6/23/07, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:57:10AM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
>  hi,
>i am using gimp 2.2 on fbsd 6.2, i found that gimp crash when I try
to
>  draw a line using tools like brush or pencil, a dot is fine, does
anybody
>  have this trouble?? thanks!!

This is a bug in libX11. A fix was applied to the port at 22 Jun 2007
02:55:16. I suggest you update your ports tree and rebuild the libX11
port.

Roland
--
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: I guess I misread.

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

On 22/06/07, Blah Blatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I thought that I followed the directions in UPDATING
regarding Xorg 7.2, but, uh, I guess I didn't.  My computer
now seems beyond repair, with respect to X.  I'm strongly
considering giving up, wiping the hard drive, reinstalling
FreeBSD, and restoring my personal stuff from backups.



Umm, much shorter path:
rm -r /usr/local/* /usr/X11R6 /var/db/pkg/*
That way you get to keep your security updated kernel
and userland and you don't have to restore /home,
/etc, /var/log . . .


So, my questions:

If I do that, and install the latest xorg on a completely fresh
FreeBSD box:

Do I have to set XORG_UPGRADE (or whatever it's called)?


I think you have to have either that or link /usr/X11R6 to
/usr/local, though setting the variable will mitigate potential
problems and will not harm you or any baby fur seals.
You can skip the script ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh
if you hand modify /etc/manpath.conf, /etc/rc.conf, and
/etc/periodic.conf.  The mergebase script is easier in the
aggregate than dealing with the frustrations of hand
checking your own work.


Should I still use portupgrade-devel instead of portupgrade?
I would rather just use portupgrade, if I can.

Do I have to follow any of the other directions in UPDATING
regarding this... stuff?

Or can I just do a normal old "cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg; make install"
without any of the special new exciting xorg crap in UPDATING?


You don't need portupgrade to install anything, it
is an upgrade tool.  You will still probably need to
set XORG_UPGRADE, but otherwise that method
will work, with the caveat that you might have to
install graphics/libGL (IIRC) if the install process
barfs midway through.


I have googled about this, but have found seemingly conflicting
statements, which is why I am explicitly asking.


The instructions in ports/UPDATING actually work if
followed properly and in order, albeit there may be a
few cases where something breaks.  Every case so far
posted to this mailing list has been failure to follow instructions
properly. Much of the garbage on various messageboards
about shortcutting the process is worth exactly what you pay.


--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Host a download for FreeBSD

[Manolis Kiagias]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>May I host a download for FreeBSD?
> 600Kb/s average download speed.
>
> Cory Benda
>
You don't need permission for this; FreeBSD is freely distributable.
In fact, unless FreeBSD org releases a DVD edition on the next release,
I plan to upload a torrent with a self made one. It will probably save a
lot of people the hassle of disk swapping (it surely has for me).

Manolis
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: To install xorg meta port in preparation for xorg upgrade

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

On 21/06/07, Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 6/21/07, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2007 09:32:31 Andrew Falanga wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How can one install the xorg meta port for version 6.9 before
> > beginning the upgrade to 7.2?  I have already updated my ports tree,
> > and I don't think I do one of these numbers any longer:

. . .

all installed ok and I'm now working through the install to xorg 7.2.


It actually works fine to run the upgrade without
the meta-port and install it at the end.

--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Host a download for FreeBSD

[webmaster]

   May I host a download for FreeBSD?
600Kb/s average download speed.

Cory Benda

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

NFS Problems/Questions

[Jason Morgan]

I've been having some trouble with NFS performance for some time and
now that class is out, I've had a bit of time to investigate but I'm
stuck. Below are the details of my investigation. Hopefully, someone
here can give me some advice.

The basic problem is that my NFS performance is very slow. Right now,
I am connecting two workstations to a NFS server, which has my home
directory, etc, mounted. They are connected over a gigabit network
(right now with mtu set to 7000, which is supported by all hardware --
changing it to 1500 has no effect on performance, which is
strange). Each system is running 6.2-RELEASE or -STABLE. Each system
is also using the following network card:

# ifconfig sk0
sk0: flags=8843 mtu 7000
options=b
inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
ether 00:17:9a:bb:05:87
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX )
status: active

# dmesg | grep sk
skc0:  port 0xec00-0xecff mem 
  0xfdff8000-0xfdffbfff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci0
skc0: DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter rev. (0x9)
sk0:   on skc0
sk0:  Ethernet address: 00:17:9a:XX:XX:XX

## Server /etc/rc.conf settings

rpcbind_enable="YES"
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 12"
nfs_bufpackets="32"
mountd_flags="-r"


## Client /etc/rc.conf settings

nfs_client_enable="YES"
nfs_bufpackets="32"
nfsiod_enable="YES"
nfsiod_flags="-n 6"
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
rpcbind_enable="YES"

## /etc/exports

/usr -alldirs,maproot=root client1 client2


For performance benchmarking, I am using dd. Locally from the server,
this is a representative result when writing a 1GB file:

## Local write test (for an upper-bound on what to expect).

# dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 19.580184 secs (53552919 bytes/sec)

Connecting from a client (both clients get approximately the same
results).

## Remote connection (UDP), mounted in /etc/fstab as with flags:
## rw,-U,-3,-r=32768,-w=32768

# dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 101.151139 secs (10366428 bytes/sec)

## Remote connection (TCP), mounted in /etc/fstab as with flags:
## rw,-T,-3,-r=32768,-w=32768

# dd if=/dev/zero of=./nfs.dat bs=1024k count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 59.668585 secs (17573334 bytes/sec)

As can be seen above, TCP is much faster than UPD. I have tried many
different mount settings and these are the best results I could
get. To test whether or not I have having network issues, I
transferred the same nfs.dat file via a http connection and got
~32MB/sec -- almost 2x the speed of the TCP NFS connection. 32MB/sec
is about what I would expect given that my fastest write speed is
~50MB/sec.

At this point I am stumped. I have tried increasing/changing the
number of nfsiod servers as well as nfs_bufpackets. No matter what
settings I change, the results are always the same. I get only two
errors, first on /var/log/messages on the server I have just begun
seeing:

Jun 22 21:13:47 crichton routed[666]: sendto(dc1, 224.0.0.2): Operation not 
permitted
Jun 22 21:13:47 crichton routed[666]: sendto(sk0, 224.0.0.2): Operation not 
permitted
Jun 22 21:13:50 crichton routed[666]: sendto(dc1, 224.0.0.2): Operation not 
permitted
Jun 22 21:13:50 crichton routed[666]: sendto(sk0, 224.0.0.2): Operation not 
permitted

This appeared after I added a route; however, I added the route after
many of the tests were done. I get the same results now as before the
new route. On one of the clients (the one running 6.2-RELEASE-p1), I
also get a nasty error:

nfs/tcp clnt: Error 60 reading socket, tearing down TCP connection

This cropped up last night after I tweaked some settings. They have
now been changed back, but I still get this error. The other client is
unaffected.

I appreciate any help people can provide on tracking down the
issues. Sorry about the long email -- just trying to be thorough. Of
course, I've searched the Internet and can't find any clear assistence
on these issues.

Cheers,
~Jason
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: gimp error

[Roland Smith]

On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:57:10AM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
>  hi,
>i am using gimp 2.2 on fbsd 6.2, i found that gimp crash when I try to
>  draw a line using tools like brush or pencil, a dot is fine, does anybody
>  have this trouble?? thanks!!

This is a bug in libX11. A fix was applied to the port at 22 Jun 2007
02:55:16. I suggest you update your ports tree and rebuild the libX11 port.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgp5PlCtprnsM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Help with php5-curl scripting

[Bob]

I want to use php5-curl to fetch a remote server login page, load the form
with id & pw and post form.
Looking for sample php5-curl script to use as guide to custom my own from.
Samples / examples from working set would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: probe Hardware manually in FreeBSD 6.2

[erik freaks]

On 6/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> hi..
> when I try to install freeBSD 6.2 I got this message "No disk found !
> Please
> verify that the disk
> controller is being probed properly during boot time"
>
> how can I solve this problem,please..
> ___

Can you give us more information?
What kind of motherboard you have?
What kind of disk(s) you are using?

If you press [scroll lock] and use the arrow keys
you will see the complete inventory of your hardware.





my hardware:
1.motherboard :asus p4p8x
2.disk:samsung IDE 160Gb
please help me, thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: troubles getting ports index

[Lowell Gilbert]

"Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>Thanks for your reply. I was thinking that, does make fetchindex
> get it's server information off of the cvsup settings?

No.  It uses MASTER_SITE_INDEX, which defaults to 
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/ (see /usr/ports/Makefile).

I just tried it, and it worked fine for me.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: gimp error

[Oliver Herold]

There is an error in libX11, you have to patch this library.

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2007-June/004649.html

Cheers,

Oliver

On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
>  On 6/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >i am using gimp 2.2 on fbsd 6.2, i found that gimp crash when I try to
> > draw a line using tools like brush or pencil, a dot is fine, does anybody
> > have this trouble?? thanks!!
> 
> 
> 
>  not knowing if this would help, here is the message:
> 
> 
>  The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error.
>  This probably reflects a bug in the program.
>  The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
>   (Details: serial 40235 error_code 3 request_code 39 minor_code 0)
>   (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
>that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
>To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
>option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
>backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
> 
>  (script-fu:60767): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error
> 
>  and I have removed .gimp-2.2 and re-initiate gimp, still the same..
> 
>  TFC
> >
>  ___
>  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>  To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

-- 
We are the unwilling... led by the unqualified...
to do the unnecessary... for the ungrateful...
-- GI in Vietnam, 1970
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

fusefs-ntfs problem

[Anton Galitch]

Hi
I want to install fusefs-ntfs to enable write support in ntfs partitions.

when I do:
make install it says:


# make install
===>  Installing for fusefs-ntfs-1.417_2
===>   fusefs-ntfs-1.417_2 depends on file: /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko - not
found
===>Verifying install for /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko in
/usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod
===>  Building for fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_5
===> fuse_module (all)
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-0.3.0/fuse_module
===> mount_fusefs (all)
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-0.3.0/mount_fusefs
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe   -I/usr/src/sbin/mount -I../include  -c
mount_fusefs.c
mount_fusefs.c:47:21: mntopts.h: No such file or directory
mount_fusefs.c:58: error: elements of array `mopts' have incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[0]')
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[0]')
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[0]')
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:59: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[0]')
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[1]')
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[1]')
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[1]')
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:60: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[1]')
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[2]')
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[2]')
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[2]')
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:61: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[2]')
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[3]')
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[3]')
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[3]')
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:62: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[3]')
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[4]')
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[4]')
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[4]')
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:63: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[4]')
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[5]')
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[5]')
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[5]')
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:65: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[5]')
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[6]')
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[6]')
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[6]')
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:66: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[6]')
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[7]')
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[7]')
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: (near initialization for `mopts[7]')
mount_fusefs.c:67: warning: excess elements in struc

Problem with openldap-sasl-client port?

[Robert Fitzpatrick]

I posted the other day, trying to install SA 3.2, it keeps attempting to
install openldap-sasl-client-2.3.36 even though it is already there. I
tried 'pkg_delete -f' and then portinstall of the ldap client, I've
tried to register FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Whenever I run 'pkgdb -F', the
ldap client deps want to link to the openldap-server-2.3.36. Am I going
to have to uninstall all deps fro the ldap client and re-install? Will
that work...

mx1# pkg_delete openldap-sasl-client-2.3.36
pkg_delete: package 'openldap-sasl-client-2.3.36' is required by these other 
packages
and may not be deinstalled:
amavisd-new-2.5.0,1
apache-2.2.4_2
dirmngr-0.9.7_2
gnupg-2.0.3
openldap-server-2.3.36
pear-1.5.4
pear-Auth-1.5.0
pear-Auth_SASL-1.0.2
pear-DB-1.7.11,1
pear-File_Passwd-1.1.6
pear-Log-1.9.10
pear-Mail_Mime-1.4.0,1
pear-Net_IMAP-1.0.3
pear-Net_POP3-1.3.6
pear-Net_SMTP-1.2.10
pear-Net_Socket-1.0.7
pear-Pager-2.3.4
pear-SOAP-0.10.1
php5-5.2.2
php5-gettext-5.2.2
php5-ldap-5.2.2
php5-mysql-5.2.2
php5-openssl-5.2.2
php5-pcre-5.2.2
php5-pgsql-5.2.2
php5-session-5.2.2
php5-wddx-5.2.2
php5-xml-5.2.2
postfix-2.4.3,1
postgresql-server-8.2.4_1
smarty-2.6.18
mx1# pkgdb -F
--->  Checking the package registry database
[Updating the pkgdb  in /var/db/pkg ... - 505 packages found 
(-1 +1) (...). done]
Stale dependency: amavisd-new-2.5.0,1 -> p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0 
(mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin):
p5-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1 (score:56%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no]
Install stale dependency? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [yes] no
New dependency? (? to help):
Skip this? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [yes]
Skipped.
Stale dependency: nagios-2.9_1 -> openldap-client-2.3.35 
(net/openldap23-client):
openldap-server-2.3.36 (score:52%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] ^C

-- 
Robert

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

fusefs-ntfs

[Anton Galitch]

Hi
I have this problem while compiling fusfs-ntfs:

mount_fusefs.c:72: error: `MOPT_STDOPTS' undeclared here (not in a function)
mount_fusefs.c:72: error: initializer element is not constant
mount_fusefs.c:72: error: (near initialization for `mopts[12]')
mount_fusefs.c:74: error: `MOPT_END' undeclared here (not in a function)
mount_fusefs.c:74: error: initializer element is not constant
mount_fusefs.c:74: error: (near initialization for `mopts[13]')
mount_fusefs.c: In function `main':
mount_fusefs.c:139: error: `getmnt_silent' undeclared (first use in this
function)
mount_fusefs.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mount_fusefs.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.)
mount_fusefs.c:179: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:179: error: increment of pointer to unknown structure
mount_fusefs.c:179: error: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:180: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:181: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:247: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:247: error: increment of pointer to unknown structure
mount_fusefs.c:247: error: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:248: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c: In function `usage':
mount_fusefs.c:379: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:379: error: increment of pointer to unknown structure
mount_fusefs.c:379: error: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c:380: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
mount_fusefs.c: At top level:
mount_fusefs.c:58: warning: array 'mopts' assumed to have one element
mount_fusefs.c:58: error: storage size of `mopts' isn't known
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd- 0.3.0/mount_fusefs.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-0.3.0.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs.




Whats the problem??
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: gimp error

[Tsu-Fan Cheng]

On 6/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


hi,
   i am using gimp 2.2 on fbsd 6.2, i found that gimp crash when I try to
draw a line using tools like brush or pencil, a dot is fine, does anybody
have this trouble?? thanks!!




not knowing if this would help, here is the message:


The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
 (Details: serial 40235 error_code 3 request_code 39 minor_code 0)
 (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
  that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
  To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
  option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
  backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

(script-fu:60767): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error

and I have removed .gimp-2.2 and re-initiate gimp, still the same..

TFC



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

gimp error

[Tsu-Fan Cheng]

hi,
  i am using gimp 2.2 on fbsd 6.2, i found that gimp crash when I try to
draw a line using tools like brush or pencil, a dot is fine, does anybody
have this trouble?? thanks!!

TFC
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Flash not working [ Upgraded to FreeBSD 6.2 ]

[Animesh Sharma]

I have read various tutorials following google searches and still could not
make flash work on FreeBSD. Is there some native flash player for FreeBSD as
there is for Linux now?
Rest of the things are working very well :) FreeBSD is getting cooler with
each release. Here is how it went, I downloaded CD1 of the FreeBSD (just for
base and no ports) and then proceeded to install as follows. Chose 1 to
BOOT, Select Country, Select Keyboard layout. Later the diskmanager comes,
went to the partition on which I had installed 6.0RC1. I wanted to do a
fresh install so I deleted it using 'D', then Create using 'C' and press 'Q'
to save-and-quit diskmanager. The next screen is for slicing the newly
created FreeBSD partition (with number 165), chose using up-down arrow keys
and press 'A' for auto-slicing (works well for quick and dirty install like
this), pressed 'Q' to save-and-quit slicemanager. Now comes the next screen
for selecting packages, I chose the 'custom' and then selected 'ALL'. It
also asks if one wants to install 'ports' tree with a cost of 440MB, since
it is worthit, I say 'yes'.
Create the root password and a normal-user account as the installer asks.
Install the bootloader too at MBR. This will allow to boot any other OS you
have.
My WinXP is coming as option F1 and FreeBSD as F2.
Now reboot. Chose F2 to boot FreeBSD and press enter... one more time to
avoid 9 s lag!
Now I logged in as root and did the most important thing, getting the
wireless card working!
I have this Motorola bcmwl5 card which does not have the FreeBSD driver. I
repeated what I did for making it work in FreeBSD 6.0 [ follow
http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/05/freebsd-howto-ndisulate-windows-drivers/and
may be
http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/041221A/ ].
To enable my sound card, I had to edit /boot/defaults/loader.conf and
replace NO with YES at the snd_drv_ich using vi and card worked like magic.
http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/wiki/index.php/Quick_HOWTO_:_Ch09_:_Linux_Users_and_Sudois
a nice tutorial to enable SUDO [bob, bunny  ALL=(ALL) ALL]
For autologin, I followed
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00671.html
To install Fluxbox - http://www.pragana.net/short-commands.htmlFluxbox
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-291835-highlight-torsmo+tips.htmlhttp://www.tuxmachines.org/node/392
For xmms-wma - http://mcmcc.bat.ru/xmms-wma/
For mplayer, http://www.freebsdforums.org/forums/printthread.php?t=46698 the
security vulnerability thing has to be closed.
For playing the DVD, I found ogle and ogle-guimplayer very good [remember to
disable quicktime using make config in /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-codecs].


--"The Answer Lies in
Genome"--
http://computationalbiologynews.blogspot.com/
(+91) 9868580004
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

More XORG_UPGRADE questions

[Blah Blatz]

Thanks for the responses to the previous ones.

If I have successfully upgraded to xorg 7.2, and later I want to do a 
portupgrade of my installed ports to a newer version, and those include xorg or 
some xorg-related ports, do I have to again make sure that XORG_UPGRADE is set?

Or, after having successfully upgraded to 7.2, can I forget about XORG_UPGRADE 
forever (at least, until the next time that I install xorg on a fresh box)?

How long is it planned/expected to be so that people installing on a fresh box 
(or, depending on the answer to that last question, upgrading their existing 
7.2+) have to know/remember XORG_UPGRADE?

If I use portupgrade-devel to upgrade to 7.2, can I then go back to plain old 
portupgrade and not have to worry about it screwing up future updates to 
xorg/xorg-related stuff, or do I have to keep portupgrade-devel indefinitely?

Thanks in advance.

 
-
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
 Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: IPv6 Setup...

[Eric F Crist]

On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:23 PMJun 22, 2007, Eric F Crist wrote:


Hello all,

I've been toying with getting IPv6 installed and running for a  
while, and I've got only one hurdle remaining.


I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary  
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say  
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel  
(router doesn't support IPv6 yet, on my end) to 1000:2000:1::5.  I  
can ping6 all day long across this tunnel, and I can even connect  
through this firewall to other sites using the IPv6 addresses.


I've been given 2001:4900:1:0111::/64 for my use.  I've configured / 
etc/rc.conf on my first two machines with ipv6_enable="YES" and  
given them 2001:4980:1:0111::1 and 2001:4980:1:0111::2.  Each  
machine can ping6 itself, but they cannot ping6 eachother.  I know  
the copper is good, and my ipv6 is running along side my ipv4  
addresses and such.  In addition, there are no firewalls in between.


Is there something I'm missing?

Also, what the heck is rtadvd_enable="YES" actually doing for me?   
I understand it's broadcasting some routing stuff so my other hosts  
can auto-configure their IPv6 addresses, but anything else?


Thanks a lot all!
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks



Alright, sorry to reply to my own post, but the situation is a little  
different than I thought.  As it turns out, all of my systems can  
ping eachother, save my gateway/firewall machine.  This machine is  
configured with 2 NICs, with ethernet bridging.  My configuration is  
as follows:


INET -- ROUTER -- FBSD GATEWAY -- LAN

While the FBSD GATEWAY has an IP assigned to it's internal interface  
(available from both sides), and it's bridging IPv6 correctly, I'm  
thinking this may be my IPv6 problem.  The gateway has a gif tunnel  
to my ISP for IPv6 routing, as my cheap router doesn't support the  
new IP protocol.  The gateway can ping across the tunnel using IPv6  
perfectly fine.  It can also ping it's own IPv6 addresses, regardless  
of the interface.  What I CANNOT do, is ping to the IPv6 box from any  
machine on my LAN.  I can ping IPv4 just fine.


Please help!

Eric Crist


-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re[2]: "xfce-4.4.1_1" incomplete build

[Gerard]

On June 23, 2007 at 08:29AM Christian Walther wrote:


> A quick search with google gave the following result:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07913.html
> 
> Quote: "/usr/local/include/X11/PM/PM.h was installed by package
> xproxymanagementprotocol-1.0.2"
> 
> % cd /usr/ports
> % make search name=xproxymanagementprotocol
> Port:   xproxymanagementprotocol-1.0.2
> Path:   /usr/ports/x11/xproxymanagementprotocol
> Info:   X Proxy Management Protocol headers
> Maint:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> B-deps:
> R-deps:
> WWW:http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xlibs
> 
> Looks as if some dependencies of the ports you mentioned are broken.
> 
> HTH
> Christian

Thanks, I will look into that this afternoon.

-- 
Gerard

Quote du Jour

"Reality is an illusion created by alcoholic deficiency."

Anonymous
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: IPv6 Setup...

[Eric Crist]

On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:17 AMJun 23, 2007, Tilman Linneweh wrote:



On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary  
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say  
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel  
(router doesn't support IPv6 yet, on my end) to 1000:2000:1::5.  I  
can ping6 all day long across this tunnel, and I can even connect  
through this firewall to other sites using the IPv6 addresses.


I've been given 2001:4900:1:0111::/64 for my use.  I've  
configured /etc/rc.conf on my first two machines with  
ipv6_enable="YES" and given them 2001:4980:1:0111::1 and  
2001:4980:1:0111::2.  Each machine can ping6 itself, but they  
cannot ping6 eachother.  I know the copper is good, and my ipv6 is  
running along side my ipv4 addresses and such.  In addition, there  
are no firewalls in between.


Is there something I'm missing?


Maybe you used a /128 netmask, or a wrong routing table? Try  
sniffing with tcpdump/wireshark to see what is going on.




Also, what the heck is rtadvd_enable="YES" actually doing for me?   
I understand it's broadcasting some routing stuff so my other  
hosts can auto-configure their IPv6 addresses, but anything else?




There is a section in the handbook about ipv6:
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network- 
ipv6.html




Something I've just learned is that autoconfiguration of IPv6 *is*  
working to my ipv6 gateway.  I can ping between machines using their  
autoconfiguration addresses, however, I cannot ping statically  
assigned addresses.  Also, it appears that all of my servers, those  
set to autoconf and those note, have 2001:4900:1:111::1 assigned to  
their loopback address.  Is this normal?  The route on a host looks  
like:


Internet6:
DestinationGatewayFlags  Netif Expire
:: localhost.secure-c UGRSlo0
localhost.secure-c localhost.secure-c UHL lo0
:::0.0.0.0 localhost.secure-c UGRSlo0
2001:4900:1:111::  link#1 UC  sk0
2001:4900:1:111::1 my:ma:ca:dd:re:ss  UHL lo0
2001:4900:1:111:20 ma:ca:dd:re:ss:02  UHLWsk0
fe80:: localhost.secure-c UGRSlo0
fe80::%sk0 link#1 UC  sk0
fe80::212:17ff:fe4 my:mc:ca:dd:re:ss  UHL lo0
fe80::%lo0 fe80::1%lo0U   lo0
fe80::1%lo0link#4 UHL lo0
ff01:1::   link#1 UC  sk0
ff01:4::   localhost.secure-c UC  lo0
ff02:: localhost.secure-c UGRSlo0
ff02::%sk0 link#1 UC  sk0
ff02::%lo0 localhost.secure-c UC  lo0

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: IPv6 Setup...

[Tilman Linneweh]

On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary  
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say  
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel  
(router doesn't support IPv6 yet, on my end) to 1000:2000:1::5.  I  
can ping6 all day long across this tunnel, and I can even connect  
through this firewall to other sites using the IPv6 addresses.


I've been given 2001:4900:1:0111::/64 for my use.  I've configured / 
etc/rc.conf on my first two machines with ipv6_enable="YES" and  
given them 2001:4980:1:0111::1 and 2001:4980:1:0111::2.  Each  
machine can ping6 itself, but they cannot ping6 eachother.  I know  
the copper is good, and my ipv6 is running along side my ipv4  
addresses and such.  In addition, there are no firewalls in between.


Is there something I'm missing?


Maybe you used a /128 netmask, or a wrong routing table? Try sniffing  
with tcpdump/wireshark to see what is going on.




Also, what the heck is rtadvd_enable="YES" actually doing for me?   
I understand it's broadcasting some routing stuff so my other hosts  
can auto-configure their IPv6 addresses, but anything else?




There is a section in the handbook about ipv6:
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network- 
ipv6.html


regards
arved


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: IPv6 Setup...

[Eric Crist]

On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:17 AMJun 23, 2007, Tilman Linneweh wrote:



On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary  
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say  
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel  
(router doesn't support IPv6 yet, on my end) to 1000:2000:1::5.  I  
can ping6 all day long across this tunnel, and I can even connect  
through this firewall to other sites using the IPv6 addresses.


I've been given 2001:4900:1:0111::/64 for my use.  I've  
configured /etc/rc.conf on my first two machines with  
ipv6_enable="YES" and given them 2001:4980:1:0111::1 and  
2001:4980:1:0111::2.  Each machine can ping6 itself, but they  
cannot ping6 eachother.  I know the copper is good, and my ipv6 is  
running along side my ipv4 addresses and such.  In addition, there  
are no firewalls in between.


Is there something I'm missing?


Maybe you used a /128 netmask, or a wrong routing table? Try  
sniffing with tcpdump/wireshark to see what is going on.




Also, what the heck is rtadvd_enable="YES" actually doing for me?   
I understand it's broadcasting some routing stuff so my other  
hosts can auto-configure their IPv6 addresses, but anything else?




There is a section in the handbook about ipv6:
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network- 
ipv6.html




Tilman,

Thanks for the reply.  I'm sure I'm using a /64 prefix and I've  
already read heavily through the page mentioned above.


Any other ideas?

Eric Crist
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: "xfce-4.4.1_1" incomplete build

[Christian Walther]

Hi Gerard,

On 23/06/07, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]

xfindproxy.c:40:23: X11/PM/PM.h: No such file or directory


A quick search with google gave the following result:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07913.html

Quote: "/usr/local/include/X11/PM/PM.h was installed by package
xproxymanagementprotocol-1.0.2"

% cd /usr/ports
% make search name=xproxymanagementprotocol
Port:   xproxymanagementprotocol-1.0.2
Path:   /usr/ports/x11/xproxymanagementprotocol
Info:   X Proxy Management Protocol headers
Maint:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
B-deps:
R-deps:
WWW:http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xlibs

Looks as if some dependencies of the ports you mentioned are broken.

HTH
Christian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

"xfce-4.4.1_1" incomplete build

[Gerard]

FreeBSD-6.2
Xorg-7.2

When attempting to build 'xfce-4.4.1_1' using portupgrade, there are
three ports that will not build. This is on an older Compaq machine
that I wanted to experiment on.

1) x11/xrx
2) x11/xfindproxy
3) x11/xfwp

I have include the log file from the build attempt of 'x11/xfindproxy'
below. However, they are all similar and all contain the same error
message:

xfindproxy.c:40:23: X11/PM/PM.h: No such file or directory

All of the logs refer to an X11/PM/PM.h file not being available. I am
at a lose to figure out how to proceed.



Script started on Sat Jun 23 06:14:53 2007
===>  Extracting for xfindproxy-1.0.1
=> MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/app/xfindproxy-1.0.1.tar.bz2.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/app/xfindproxy-1.0.1.tar.bz2.
===>  Patching for xfindproxy-1.0.1
===>   xfindproxy-1.0.1 depends on file: 
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xproxymngproto.pc - found
===>   xfindproxy-1.0.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc - 
found
===>   xfindproxy-1.0.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/ice.pc - 
found
===>   xfindproxy-1.0.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xt.pc - 
found
===>   xfindproxy-1.0.1 depends on executable in : pkg-config - found
===>  Configuring for xfindproxy-1.0.1
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... nawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6.2-gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of cc... gcc3
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel
checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6.2-pkg-config... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for DEP... yes
checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6.2
checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6.2
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
===>  Building for xfindproxy-1.0.1
make  all-am
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-D_THREAD_SAFE -I/usr/local/include -O2 
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium2 -MT xfindproxy-xfindproxy.o -MD -MP 
-MF ".deps/xfindproxy-xfindproxy.Tpo"  -c -o xfindproxy-xfindproxy.o `test -f 
'xfindproxy.c' || echo './'`xfindproxy.c;  then mv -f 
".deps/xfindproxy-xfindproxy.Tpo" ".deps/xfindproxy-xfindproxy.Po";  else rm -f 
".deps/xfindproxy-xfindproxy.Tpo"; exit 1;  fi
xfindproxy.c:40:23: X11/PM/PM.h: No such file or directory
xfindproxy.c:41:28: X11/PM/PMproto.h: No such file or directory
xfindproxy.c:61: error: `PM_MAJOR_VERSION' undeclared here (not in a function)
xfindproxy.c:61: error: initializer element is not constant
xfindproxy.c:61: error: (near initialization for `PMversions[0].major_version')
xfindproxy.c:61: error: `PM_MINOR_VERSION' undeclared here (not in a function)
xfindproxy.c:61: error: initializer element is not constant
xfindproxy.c:61: error: (near initialization for `PMversions[0].minor_version')
xfindproxy.c:61: error: initializer element is not constant
xfindproxy.c:61: error: (near initialization for `PMversions[0]')
xfindproxy.c: In function `main':
xfindproxy.c:127: error: `pmGetProxyAddrMsg' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:127: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xfindproxy.c:127: error: for each function it appears in.)
xfindproxy.c:127: error: `pMsg' undeclared (first use in this function)
xfindproxy.c:203: error: `PM_PROTOCOL_NAME' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:290: error: `sz_pmGetProxyAddrMsg' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:290: error: syntax error before ')' token
xfindproxy.c:290: error: `PM_GetProxyAddr' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:328: error: `PM_Success' undeclared (first use in this function)
xfindproxy.c: In function `PMprocessMessages':
xfindproxy.c:357: error: `PM_GetProxyAddrReply' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:360: error: `PM_GetProxyAddr' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:369: error: `pmGetProxyAddrReplyMsg' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
xfindproxy.c:369: error: `pMsg' undeclared (first use in this function)
xfindproxy.c:379: error: `sz_pmGetProxyAddrReplyMsg' undeclared (first use

quota on samba file server

[Zbigniew Szalbot]

Hello,

I have Freebsd 6.2 installed with file quota on. Today I have installed
samba and enbaled network share for Windows machines. Now I would like to
set quota for this share. I am not sure if I should do this from the swat
panel or set the quota via command line in freebsd?

All hints gladly welcome. Thank you in advance!

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: plz help!

[Nitin Arora]

Thanks Guys

Actually, I have a older pc which was puted in store. on that pc the
BSD 4.8is installed.
now i want to connect this pc in my lan.


thanks


On 6/23/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>
> Second, is there some special reason you would want to install
> the 4.8 version?It is long ago obsolete.   I would suggest
> installing 6.2-RELEASE unless there is a very good reason to
> go with 4.8.
>
   Older laptops for one... :)

   (Actually, mine can go to 5.4 ... Once I try 5.5, it
locks up on the ata1 probe)

   Tuc/TBOH


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"