Re: [Gajim-devel] Switch Gajim source repository to DVCS

2008-12-15 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner  wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Nico Gulden wrote:
>> recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
>>
>> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. 
>> Because
>> Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be 
>> the best
>> choice.

I would have to say that the language that your version control system
is implemented in is the least important factor, unless you want to
hack on version control systems that is.  Last I heard Gajim wasn't a
version control system.

> First, I'm not a gajim developer, I just poke to code that runs on my
> machine from time to time, so my preferences have really low importance.
>
> I agree that DVCS is better. However, I prefer git (first, it seems to
> have faster response, second, I know it much better). I guess git is
> more familiar to much more developers than hg. Psi used darcs for a
> while and they found out it is a problem to some of the potential
> developers. But as I say, I'm not a developer of gajim, so do not take
> this as a vote, please.

I'm not a developer of Gajim either, but this website says everything
that I'd like to say about git:

http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/

-- 
Jeff Ollie

"You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then
I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the
terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve
them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and
unfairness of the universe."

-- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon"
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel


Re: [Gajim-devel] Switch Gajim source repository to DVCS

2008-12-15 Thread Nikos Kouremenos
git is not very nice to Microsoft Windows and I guess we all love Python
here.

Ok Yann didn't know you couldn't bare svn anymore, I'm curious how that
happened ;)


I curse you all to go back to the days of cvs :P hehe

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 15:31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner  wrote:

> Hello
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Nico Gulden wrote:
> > recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
> >
> > I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why.
> Because
> > Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could
> be the best
> > choice.
>
> First, I'm not a gajim developer, I just poke to code that runs on my
> machine from time to time, so my preferences have really low importance.
>
> I agree that DVCS is better. However, I prefer git (first, it seems to
> have faster response, second, I know it much better). I guess git is
> more familiar to much more developers than hg. Psi used darcs for a
> while and they found out it is a problem to some of the potential
> developers. But as I say, I'm not a developer of gajim, so do not take
> this as a vote, please.
>
> With regards
>
> --
> How many Lisp programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
> (((H)mmm,) (I'm ((not) sure, better))) (find (out))...
>
> Michal 'vorner' Vaner
>
> ___
> Gajim-devel mailing list
> Gajim-devel@gajim.org
> http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
>
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel

Re: [Gajim-devel] Switch Gajim source repository to DVCS

2008-12-15 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Hello

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Nico Gulden wrote:
> recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
> 
> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. Because
> Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be 
> the best
> choice.

First, I'm not a gajim developer, I just poke to code that runs on my
machine from time to time, so my preferences have really low importance.

I agree that DVCS is better. However, I prefer git (first, it seems to
have faster response, second, I know it much better). I guess git is
more familiar to much more developers than hg. Psi used darcs for a
while and they found out it is a problem to some of the potential
developers. But as I say, I'm not a developer of gajim, so do not take
this as a vote, please.

With regards

-- 
How many Lisp programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
(((H)mmm,) (I'm ((not) sure, better))) (find (out))...

Michal 'vorner' Vaner


pgpSjSWLBtC2i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel

Re: [Gajim-devel] Switch Gajim source repository to DVCS

2008-12-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer

Am 15.12.2008 um 14:46 schrieb Michal 'vorner' Vaner:

I'm not saying it is problem of usability, but of familiarity. I'm  
able

to, for example, edit the history before I push my commits, if I make
mistake, with git. I do not think I can do this with hg. I do not  
say I

can not do it. I just say I need to spend half an hour reading the
manual. Which is not a problem if I want to develop it for a longer
time. But it might stop some people from creating a single patch when
they find a bug.


I think what you're looking for is hg rollback and/or hg export/ 
import ;).


--
Jonathan



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel

Re: [Gajim-devel] Switch Gajim source repository to DVCS

2008-12-15 Thread Nico Gulden
> I recently merged bosh branch and trunk, and I cannot bear svn
> anymore.
> And as Jonathan said, I already configures a mercurial repo a trac
> test
> too. What needs to be done: port all hook scripts we had in svn, map
> svn
> revs to hg revs (I have no idea how to do that ...)
> 
> So this will come soon :)

Great. I'm looking forward to it :-).

-- 
Nico Gulden
E-Mail: cilugne...@gmx.de || Jabber-ID: cilugne...@jabber.org
1024D/B94B8FCB BBC1 D649 BBA7 C1E4 97BC 30F3 FF4C E2F1 B94B 8FCB

Yeah, well that's why it's numbered 2.3.1... it's for those of us who
miss NT-like uptimes


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel