Re: [google-appengine] Static files limit
Hi Takashi, thanks for your reply. I'm not sure where to request the feature. So, I do it here. Could you please increase the limit for static files for billed apps? Thanks! Regards, Stefan Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2012 12:29:58 UTC+2 schrieb Takashi Matsuo (Google): Hi Stefan, Unfortunately there is no plan to increase the maximum file count. Can you create a feature request for this? -- Takashi On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stefan stefan...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding the static files quota. With billing enabled it is now possible to upload more than 1GB. The number of files limit is still 10.000. Will that be changed? Thanks! Regards, Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/F6cj-MS5whYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Takashi Matsuo | Developers Advocate | tma...@google.com javascript: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/dlUyHP5C8NMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Static files limit
Stefan, he means create a feature request on the issue list, here: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list On Friday, September 21, 2012 9:44:36 AM UTC+2, Stefan wrote: Hi Takashi, thanks for your reply. I'm not sure where to request the feature. So, I do it here. Could you please increase the limit for static files for billed apps? Thanks! Regards, Stefan Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2012 12:29:58 UTC+2 schrieb Takashi Matsuo (Google): Hi Stefan, Unfortunately there is no plan to increase the maximum file count. Can you create a feature request for this? -- Takashi On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stefan stefan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding the static files quota. With billing enabled it is now possible to upload more than 1GB. The number of files limit is still 10.000. Will that be changed? Thanks! Regards, Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/F6cj-MS5whYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Takashi Matsuo | Developers Advocate | tma...@google.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/5qVy-h38uqAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Weird Instance Scheduler
OK, ready to deploy again, and of course I immediately ran into this issue (along with a bunch of problems related to channels). Here are the logs. Note the 7-second gap between the request that created a new instance, and the immediately preceding instance. Note also that there was no warmup request. I now see in the documentation that warmup requests aren't guaranteed, so I'm not sure adding a warmup handler will actually help me; in any case, I haven't explicitly disabled them. So, yeah. No solution at this point, and random 10s delays are not acceptable. Takashi, can you analyze this and tell me what's going on? 1. 1. 2012-09-21 01:50:03.465 /api/game/80001/submit?messages=MOVE+Gray.Cross+600+136+135+134+2+false;MOVE+Gray.Queue+600+34+35+36+0+falseindex=21 200 176ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9B206 76.102.149.245 - - [21/Sep/2012:01:50:03 -0700] POST /api/game/80001/submit?messages=MOVE+Gray.Cross+600+136+135+134+2+false;MOVE+Gray.Queue+600+34+35+36+0+falseindex=21 HTTP/1.1 200 192 - Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9B206 titan-game-qa.appspot.com ms=176 cpu_ms=163 cpm_usd=0.80 instance=00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007 https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=titan-game-qaversion_id=1.361909218547818204key=00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007#00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007 2. 1. 2012-09-21 01:49:50.460 /api/game/80001/submit?messages=SPLIT+Gray.Queue+Gray.Cross+Angel+Centaur+Centaur+Gargoyleindex=17 200 9609ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9B206 76.102.149.245 - - [21/Sep/2012:01:49:50 -0700] POST /api/game/80001/submit?messages=SPLIT+Gray.Queue+Gray.Cross+Angel+Centaur+Centaur+Gargoyleindex=17 HTTP/1.1 200 187 - Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9B206 titan-game-qa.appspot.com ms=9609 cpu_ms=5063 cpm_usd=0.80 loading_request=1 instance=00c61b117cf26825e763cc7957e0c35cc39d68 https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=titan-game-qaversion_id=1.361909218547818204key=00c61b117cf26825e763cc7957e0c35cc39d68#00c61b117cf26825e763cc7957e0c35cc39d68 2. I2012-09-21 01:49:50.460 This request caused a new process to be started for your application, and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time. This requ 3. 1. 2012-09-21 01:49:33.240 /api/game/80001/submit?messages=MARKERCHOICE+Black.Hornindex=14200 459ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A405 76.102.149.245 - - [21/Sep/2012:01:49:33 -0700] POST /api/game/80001/submit?messages=MARKERCHOICE+Black.Hornindex=14 HTTP/1.1 200 136 - Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A405 titan-game-qa.appspot.com ms=459 cpu_ms=187 cpm_usd=0.74 instance=00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007 https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=titan-game-qaversion_id=1.361909218547818204key=00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007#00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007 4. 1. 2012-09-21 01:49:31.124 /api/game/80001/submit?messages=COLORCHOICE+Blackindex=11200 244ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A405 76.102.149.245 - - [21/Sep/2012:01:49:31 -0700] POST /api/game/80001/submit?messages=COLORCHOICE+Blackindex=11 HTTP/1.1 200 129 - Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A405 titan-game-qa.appspot.com ms=244 cpu_ms=210 cpm_usd=0.73 instance=00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007 https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=titan-game-qaversion_id=1.361909218547818204key=00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007#00c61b117c15f0ab71ada0d4f932c37adf981007 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/bruR2wS3IGoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Weird Instance Scheduler
PS. This is with default application settings, and for this test I reverted to using front ends instead of backends (since I gather backends don't support channels, that's no longer an option for me). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/-1SggFlu3_sJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] How to download Text Search to localhost dev server
Hi guys, Is there any way to download Text Search to localhost dev server for tests and debug ? Thanks in advance. Regards. Moisés Belchín. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Datastore Viewer broken - URGENT.
Hello All, In the admin console, click on the datastore viewer. * Start typing the namespace name * Select the namespace name The KINDS are shown in the dropdown. After doing this, earlier, the namespace text field was shown above. Now, this is missing. I select the KIND from the dropdown, then it says there are no entities in the empty namespace. Anyone facing this issue? I cannot seen any entities in any namespace -Aswath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Datastore Viewer broken - URGENT.
Further narrowing down on the issue. If there are fewer namespaces in the app-id, then a dropdown is shown to select the namespace. Then everything is fine for the app-id. However, if there are large number of namespaces in the app-id, then the suggest box is shown. While select the namespace here and browsing, then we are not able to view the entities in the namespace. -Aswath On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Aswath Satrasala aswath.satras...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, In the admin console, click on the datastore viewer. * Start typing the namespace name * Select the namespace name The KINDS are shown in the dropdown. After doing this, earlier, the namespace text field was shown above. Now, this is missing. I select the KIND from the dropdown, then it says there are no entities in the empty namespace. Anyone facing this issue? I cannot seen any entities in any namespace -Aswath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Asynchronous Google Storage Post using Boto and UrlFetch
I'd like to upload files to Google Storage asynchronously using Boto and UrlFetch. However, I'm not fully understanding how this could be accomplished with Boto. Has anyone had to solve this issue in the past? Or is it not possible to asynchronously post files to Google Storage? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/8dWCx0dQR38J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Asynchronous Google Storage Post using Boto and UrlFetch
If you meant POSTing from your app, I don't see why you'd need Boto for this. It's just a matter of issuing authenticated PUT/POST/whatever. You might want to take a look at NDB's Context for async/auto batching URLFetch callshttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/ndb/async#urlfetch or use Task Queue for that (or both). -- alex On Friday, September 21, 2012 6:53:42 PM UTC+2, Adam Bradley wrote: I'd like to upload files to Google Storage asynchronously using Boto and UrlFetch. However, I'm not fully understanding how this could be accomplished with Boto. Has anyone had to solve this issue in the past? Or is it not possible to asynchronously post files to Google Storage? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/NyXNazZ_CO8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Getting an error on home page in production but not in dev
Hi, Does someone has any idea about the following : I just made a production deployment. Everything was running fine in development but in prod I am getting the stack trace below. The application is running on http://www.plugimmo.com / java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.jsp.home_jsp._jspService(home_jsp.java:66) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:390) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:765) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:418) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Dispatcher.forward(Dispatcher.java:327) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/0rRUgpM_ieAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Using Java Files API for Google Cloud Storage results in corrupt files
Hi, We are currently using the Java Files API to store generated files in Google Cloud Storage. When we try to store 'larger' (1 to 15MB) generated reports (CSV and Excel) or backups of a namespace in the Datastore (stored as JSON text) we always end up with corrupt files. For example when writing something like 'ABCDEFG', we end up with 'ABCDEAB'. When we switch to Blobstore this all works fine again. I know the Java Files API to Google Cloud Storage is 'experimental', but I was hoping this functionality would work. Is this maybe a known issue? PS: The main reason to prefer GCS over Blobstore is the lack of support for namespaces in Blobstore. With GCS we can create a bucket per namespace. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/aOnH13zhIKUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Using Java Files API for Google Cloud Storage results in corrupt files
Hi Tim, We've diagnosed the issue on our side and should have a fix pushed out soon. Thanks for reporting this. Thanks, Christina On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Tim Rob t...@appcoders.nl wrote: Hi, We are currently using the Java Files API to store generated files in Google Cloud Storage. When we try to store 'larger' (1 to 15MB) generated reports (CSV and Excel) or backups of a namespace in the Datastore (stored as JSON text) we always end up with corrupt files. For example when writing something like 'ABCDEFG', we end up with 'ABCDEAB'. When we switch to Blobstore this all works fine again. I know the Java Files API to Google Cloud Storage is 'experimental', but I was hoping this functionality would work. Is this maybe a known issue? PS: The main reason to prefer GCS over Blobstore is the lack of support for namespaces in Blobstore. With GCS we can create a bucket per namespace. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/aOnH13zhIKUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Christina Ilvento | Google App Engine | cilve...@google.com | (650)-201-9399 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] App Engine HRD migration and easier process for people with no data
Google's messaging about migration is getting stronger, so I assume the why bother is so Google doesn't one day shut down my instance. - Kris On Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:30:07 PM UTC-7, Joshua Smith wrote: I have one such app, and I can tell you that it has had exactly 0 downtime for years. If you don't use the datastore, then whether you are on HR or M/S completely doesn't matter. Even during periodic maintenance, the app will just keep on serving. So… why bother? On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Greg Linden gli...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'd assume there are a large number of appengine applications that have stored nothing in the datastore. It would be fantastic if there was a quick, easy tool to do the migration to HRD for those applications without the hassle of changing the application name and other goodies people with a more serious migrations have to do. Again, I may be wrong, but I'd assume that, if you have no data in your master/slave datastore, if you are not using your master/slave datastore, the migration to HRD could be done in place. Perhaps someone at Google could think about that, whether it would be easy to do, and how many people fall into this category. I'm sure you'd have much higher compliance if you made it easier, and this probably is one easy way to make it easier for a large number of people. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VpNv04_Nr1YJ. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/4TM_AH3o8JkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] App Engine HRD migration and easier process for people with no data
Oh, well.. yeah. Good point. I think google is stuck supporting M/S for 3 years after their deprecation warning, though. So I'm in no hurry. On Sep 21, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Kristopher Giesing kris.gies...@gmail.com wrote: Google's messaging about migration is getting stronger, so I assume the why bother is so Google doesn't one day shut down my instance. - Kris On Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:30:07 PM UTC-7, Joshua Smith wrote: I have one such app, and I can tell you that it has had exactly 0 downtime for years. If you don't use the datastore, then whether you are on HR or M/S completely doesn't matter. Even during periodic maintenance, the app will just keep on serving. So… why bother? On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Greg Linden gli...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'd assume there are a large number of appengine applications that have stored nothing in the datastore. It would be fantastic if there was a quick, easy tool to do the migration to HRD for those applications without the hassle of changing the application name and other goodies people with a more serious migrations have to do. Again, I may be wrong, but I'd assume that, if you have no data in your master/slave datastore, if you are not using your master/slave datastore, the migration to HRD could be done in place. Perhaps someone at Google could think about that, whether it would be easy to do, and how many people fall into this category. I'm sure you'd have much higher compliance if you made it easier, and this probably is one easy way to make it easier for a large number of people. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VpNv04_Nr1YJ. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/4TM_AH3o8JkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Using Java Files API for Google Cloud Storage results in corrupt files
Great, thanks Christina On Friday, September 21, 2012 9:12:42 PM UTC+2, Christina Ilvento wrote: Hi Tim, We've diagnosed the issue on our side and should have a fix pushed out soon. Thanks for reporting this. Thanks, Christina On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Tim Rob t...@appcoders.nl javascript: wrote: Hi, We are currently using the Java Files API to store generated files in Google Cloud Storage. When we try to store 'larger' (1 to 15MB) generated reports (CSV and Excel) or backups of a namespace in the Datastore (stored as JSON text) we always end up with corrupt files. For example when writing something like 'ABCDEFG', we end up with 'ABCDEAB'. When we switch to Blobstore this all works fine again. I know the Java Files API to Google Cloud Storage is 'experimental', but I was hoping this functionality would work. Is this maybe a known issue? PS: The main reason to prefer GCS over Blobstore is the lack of support for namespaces in Blobstore. With GCS we can create a bucket per namespace. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/aOnH13zhIKUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Christina Ilvento | Google App Engine | cilv...@google.com javascript: | (650)-201-9399 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/vwgatrt5hPsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] EmailMessage charset UTF-8 with Python?
Does anyone know how to change the charset of an email sent with the mail API? The content-type header is [Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii]. I'm not allowed to change that header with the API and I haven't seen any options to set. The html property is being encoded as UTF-8, so there's no excuse the API doesn't know the charset. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/eTecN6YGUrMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Datastore Viewer broken - URGENT.
Please create a bug on the issue tracker. On Friday, September 21, 2012 11:43:49 PM UTC+10, aswath wrote: Further narrowing down on the issue. If there are fewer namespaces in the app-id, then a dropdown is shown to select the namespace. Then everything is fine for the app-id. However, if there are large number of namespaces in the app-id, then the suggest box is shown. While select the namespace here and browsing, then we are not able to view the entities in the namespace. -Aswath On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Aswath Satrasala aswath.s...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hello All, In the admin console, click on the datastore viewer. * Start typing the namespace name * Select the namespace name The KINDS are shown in the dropdown. After doing this, earlier, the namespace text field was shown above. Now, this is missing. I select the KIND from the dropdown, then it says there are no entities in the empty namespace. Anyone facing this issue? I cannot seen any entities in any namespace -Aswath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/s5G_ygJQHyYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Using SMTP on GAE
FYI: the Sockets API lets you use SMTP (authenticated SMTP only). If you're interested in trying it out, please sign up for the trusted tester program: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dF9QR3pnQ2pNa0dqalViSTZoenVkcHc6MQ On Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:55:40 AM UTC+10, barryhunter wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Barry Hunter wrote: To send mail use the Mail API - that is the only supported way to do it. PErhaps should qualify that: The only way to do it running directly in AppEngine. Can use other third party services/servers, as long as they have HTTP Interface/API (to be used by URLFetch API) or a number of other protocols that AppEngine supports (email! and XMPP) . So if you really need to send via SMTP, could find a server that has a HTTP interface, which then dispatches off via SMTP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Hu0F0Kvwxf8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Annourcing aeta: a test runner for Python App Engine applications
Hello, I am happy to announce that we open sourced aeta, the App Engine Test Appendix. aeta is a tool for running tests on your Python App Engine application. It was created at Google and is used to run many of our own tests. It features both a web interface and a command-line interface to run tests. Code and documentation are available at http://code.google.com/p/aeta/. We also set up a group at https://groups.google.com/group/appengine-aeta. If you have questions, suggestions or other issues you want to talk about, don't hesitate to reach out. Thanks, Jacob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/KlOOvw6e0DoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Annourcing aeta: a test runner for Python App Engine applications
Thank you. I really needed. -- Gianni 2012/9/21 Jacob Taylor jacobltay...@google.com Hello, I am happy to announce that we open sourced aeta, the App Engine Test Appendix. aeta is a tool for running tests on your Python App Engine application. It was created at Google and is used to run many of our own tests. It features both a web interface and a command-line interface to run tests. Code and documentation are available at http://code.goo**gle.com/p/aeta/http://code.google.com/p/aeta/. We also set up a group at https://groups.google.com/group/appengine-aeta. If you have questions, suggestions or other issues you want to talk about, don't hesitate to reach out. Thanks, Jacob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/KlOOvw6e0DoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
