[Hackrf-dev] Problem making firmware upgrade "stick"

[OP Imbiber]

Hi,

I am also having the same problem as discussed here:

https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/issues/380
and
http://narkive.com/bJzIcFNk.1

(After initial upgrade Hackrf One will no longer start, subsequently
switching to DFU then loading, then redoing the firmware flash the
device appears good but this flash does not "stick" and so after a
reboot the device again wont start...)

Any suggestions or ideas?

Thanks.

(Sorry if this is a repost, not sure if my first got through)
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Andrew Rich]

So basically your trying to save some dollars and get out of testing 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Aug 2017, at 9:47 am, Chuck McManis  wrote:
> 
> > What do you mean by a radio stack?
> 
> Many modules that implement various radio protocols run software on a captive 
> microprocessor. That software implements the protocol and drives the radio 
> electronics. For example TI offers firmware that runs on the processor inside 
> their CC3000 series chips that implement the Bluetooth protocols. If a 
> project uses their software in this chip, it can take advantage of TI's 
> efforts to get that software certified (see this: 
> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/CC3000_Product_Certification) which 
> saves time and effort.
> 
> For Part 15 certification (unintended emissions) you need to get a 
> certificate from a testing laboratory that is certified by the FCC. They will 
> put your product in a chamber that absorbs all RF with a wide band detector 
> and spectrum analyzer. The will detect all of the unintended emissions and 
> chart them in frequency and dBm. You take their report and a certification 
> that you aren't going to change the design, and submit that to the FCC and 
> they will give you a certification ID.
> 
> Note that the FCC won't accept your testing, they only accept a certified 
> lab's test results.
> 
> --Chuck
> 
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>> Thank you Chuck!
>> 
>> I'll check this out. What do you mean by a radio stack?
>> For now my plan is to use pre-certified modules so that my board will be 
>> certified as an unintentional radiator, which is thousands of $.
>> But I still need to prove that the board doesn't emit Electro Magnetic Field 
>> above allowed. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 at 23:35, Chuck McManis  wrote:
>>> I am not sure exactly what you are asking.
>>> 
>>> If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process it 
>>> is documented at the FCC web site here:
>>> https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/equipment-authorization
>>> 
>>> That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer 
>>> supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if 
>>> you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization 
>>> independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will 
>>> handle the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I 
>>> was on a project that needed such certification and the vendor hired 
>>> charged $50,000 and it took four months to complete. They did all the 
>>> required paperwork and followed up on all of the questions the FCC had, 
>>> they also flew out an engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the 
>>> verification tests done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC 
>>> testing facilities around here are typically reserved months, if not years, 
>>> in advance it seems).
>>> 
>>> --Chuck
>>> 
 On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
 Is there someone who did this or similar task before? 
 Any specific suggestions?
 
 
 
> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:
> 
> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a 
> licence and GNU Radio 
> 
> Andrew 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>>> Hi All!
>>> 
>>> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for 
>>> communication. Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I 
>>> am not sure if my Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, 
>>> then I need to re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF 
>>> on a socket).
>>> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench? 
>> 
>> ___
>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best Regards,
 
 Sergey Ivanov
 +7 910 424 9895
 
 ___
 HackRF-dev mailing list
 HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Sergey Ivanov
>> +7 910 424 9895
> 
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Chuck McManis]

> What do you mean by a radio stack?

Many modules that implement various radio protocols run software on a
captive microprocessor. That software implements the protocol and drives
the radio electronics. For example TI offers firmware that runs on the
processor inside their CC3000 series chips that implement the Bluetooth
protocols. If a project uses their software in this chip, it can take
advantage of TI's efforts to get that software certified (see this:
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/CC3000_Product_Certification) which
saves time and effort.

For Part 15 certification (unintended emissions) you need to get a
certificate from a testing laboratory that is certified by the FCC. They
will put your product in a chamber that absorbs all RF with a wide band
detector and spectrum analyzer. The will detect all of the unintended
emissions and chart them in frequency and dBm. You take their report and a
certification that you aren't going to change the design, and submit that
to the FCC and they will give you a certification ID.

Note that the FCC won't accept your testing, they only accept a certified
lab's test results.

--Chuck

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:

> Thank you Chuck!
>
> I'll check this out. What do you mean by a radio stack?
> For now my plan is to use pre-certified modules so that my board will be
> certified as an unintentional radiator, which is thousands of $.
> But I still need to prove that the board doesn't emit Electro Magnetic
> Field above allowed.
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 at 23:35, Chuck McManis 
> wrote:
>
>> I am not sure exactly what you are asking.
>>
>> If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process
>> it is documented at the FCC web site here:
>> https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/
>> equipment-authorization
>>
>> That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer
>> supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if
>> you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization
>> independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will
>> handle the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I
>> was on a project that needed such certification and the vendor hired
>> charged $50,000 and it took four months to complete. They did all the
>> required paperwork and followed up on all of the questions the FCC had,
>> they also flew out an engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the
>> verification tests done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC
>> testing facilities around here are typically reserved months, if not years,
>> in advance it seems).
>>
>> --Chuck
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there someone who did this or similar task before?
>>> Any specific suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:
>>>

 You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a
 licence and GNU Radio

 Andrew




 On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:

 Hi All!

 I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for
 communication. Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I
 am not sure if my Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't,
 then I need to re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on
 a socket).

 Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench?


 ___
 HackRF-dev mailing list
 HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev



>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Sergey Ivanov
>>> +7 910 424 9895 <+7%20910%20424-98-95>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>>
>>>
>> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Sergey Ivanov
> +7 910 424 9895 <+7%20910%20424-98-95>
>
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Andrew Rich]

You want to simulate the FCC tests at home I get it

But that defeats the purpose

How do u know what FCC specs to match ?

Your going to have to go through the FCC to get it certified

U want to do prelim testing at home 

A 


Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Aug 2017, at 6:00 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
> 
> Is there someone who did this or similar task before? 
> Any specific suggestions?
> 
> 
> 
>> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:
>> 
>> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a 
>> licence and GNU Radio 
>> 
>> Andrew 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
 On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
 
 Hi All!
 
 I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for communication. 
 Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I am not sure if my 
 Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, then I need to 
 re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on a socket).
 Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench? 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Sergey Ivanov
> +7 910 424 9895
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Andrew Rich]

Hack RF is test gear 

Exempt 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Aug 2017, at 6:55 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
> 
> Thank you Chuck!
> 
> I'll check this out. What do you mean by a radio stack?
> For now my plan is to use pre-certified modules so that my board will be 
> certified as an unintentional radiator, which is thousands of $.
> But I still need to prove that the board doesn't emit Electro Magnetic Field 
> above allowed. 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 at 23:35, Chuck McManis  wrote:
>> I am not sure exactly what you are asking.
>> 
>> If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process it 
>> is documented at the FCC web site here:
>> https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/equipment-authorization
>> 
>> That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer 
>> supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if 
>> you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization 
>> independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will handle 
>> the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I was on a 
>> project that needed such certification and the vendor hired charged $50,000 
>> and it took four months to complete. They did all the required paperwork and 
>> followed up on all of the questions the FCC had, they also flew out an 
>> engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the verification tests 
>> done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC testing facilities 
>> around here are typically reserved months, if not years, in advance it 
>> seems).
>> 
>> --Chuck
>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>>> Is there someone who did this or similar task before? 
>>> Any specific suggestions?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:
 
 You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a 
 licence and GNU Radio 
 
 Andrew 
 
 
 
 
>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>> 
> 
>> Hi All!
>> 
>> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for 
>> communication. Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I am 
>> not sure if my Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, 
>> then I need to re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF 
>> on a socket).
>> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench? 
> 
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> Sergey Ivanov
>>> +7 910 424 9895
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Sergey Ivanov
> +7 910 424 9895
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Sergey Ivanov]

Thank you Chuck!

I'll check this out. What do you mean by a radio stack?
For now my plan is to use pre-certified modules so that my board will be
certified as an unintentional radiator, which is thousands of $.
But I still need to prove that the board doesn't emit Electro Magnetic
Field above allowed.


On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 at 23:35, Chuck McManis  wrote:

> I am not sure exactly what you are asking.
>
> If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process
> it is documented at the FCC web site here:
>
> https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/equipment-authorization
>
> That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer
> supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if
> you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization
> independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will
> handle the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I
> was on a project that needed such certification and the vendor hired
> charged $50,000 and it took four months to complete. They did all the
> required paperwork and followed up on all of the questions the FCC had,
> they also flew out an engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the
> verification tests done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC
> testing facilities around here are typically reserved months, if not years,
> in advance it seems).
>
> --Chuck
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov 
> wrote:
>
>> Is there someone who did this or similar task before?
>> Any specific suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a
>>> licence and GNU Radio
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All!
>>>
>>> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for
>>> communication. Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I
>>> am not sure if my Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't,
>>> then I need to re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on
>>> a socket).
>>>
>>> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench?
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Sergey Ivanov
>> +7 910 424 9895 <+7%20910%20424-98-95>
>>
>> ___
>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>
>>
> --
Best Regards,

Sergey Ivanov
+7 910 424 9895
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Chuck McManis]

I am not sure exactly what you are asking.

If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process it
is documented at the FCC web site here:
https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/equipment-authorization

That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer
supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if
you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization
independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will
handle the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I
was on a project that needed such certification and the vendor hired
charged $50,000 and it took four months to complete. They did all the
required paperwork and followed up on all of the questions the FCC had,
they also flew out an engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the
verification tests done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC
testing facilities around here are typically reserved months, if not years,
in advance it seems).

--Chuck

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:

> Is there someone who did this or similar task before?
> Any specific suggestions?
>
>
>
> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:
>
>>
>> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a
>> licence and GNU Radio
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>>
>> Hi All!
>>
>> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for communication.
>> Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I am not sure if my
>> Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, then I need to
>> re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on a socket).
>>
>> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench?
>>
>>
>> ___
>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Sergey Ivanov
> +7 910 424 9895 <+7%20910%20424-98-95>
>
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>
>
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Sergey Ivanov]

Is there someone who did this or similar task before?
Any specific suggestions?



On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich  wrote:

>
> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a
> licence and GNU Radio
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov  wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for communication.
> Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I am not sure if my
> Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, then I need to
> re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on a socket).
>
> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench?
>
>
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Sergey Ivanov
+7 910 424 9895
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

[Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

[Sergey Ivanov]

Hi All!

I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for communication.
Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I am not sure if my
Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, then I need to
re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on a socket).

Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench?
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Andrew Rich]

I think you might be thinking that apt-get download some file to your pc and u 
think there is a host directory missing

This is not the case

apt-get knows where to install it for you 

A

Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Aug 2017, at 1:34 am, Marc Péquignot  wrote:
> 
> Andrew
> 
> Thank you for the precision. I was aware of this.
> The question (remark) should have been related to the host directory.
> After "sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config 
> libfftw3-dev", where is this host directory supposed to be?
> 
> Some explaination is missing.
> 
> With the unzip of "
> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/archive/master.zip"; I've it.
> 
> If I misunderstand something it is here.
> And explaination is welcome.
> Thank you for your help
> 
> 73
> 
> Marc, alias cuagn (F6dnh)
> 
> 
>> Le 04/08/2017 à 19:02, Andrew Rich a écrit :
>> Marc
>> 
>> cmake ..
>> 
>> Means in LINUX “cmake but go BACK one directory”
>> 
>> the double dot means go back one directory in LINUX
>> 
>> did it work ?
>> 
>> Andrew  
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4 Aug 2017, at 11:57 pm, Marc Péquignot  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just need to do...
>>> Not so easy.
>>> 
>>> It is said :
>>> "##How to build the host software on Linux:
>>> ###Prerequisites for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu): 
>>> sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config 
>>> libfftw3-dev
>>> ###Build host software on Linux:
>>> 
>>> mkdir host/build
>>> cd host/build
>>> cmake ..
>>> ..."
>>> 
>>> How cmake.. can do something in a newly and empty directory?
>>> Some information is missing
>>> I'm lost!
>>> Please help
>>> Marc , alias cuagn (F6dnh)
>>> My context :
>>> Ubuntu: 16.04.3 LTS
>>> Linux: 4.10.0-30-generic
>>> Gnuradio : 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2017-08-04 14:35 GMT+02:00 Marc Péquignot :
 Andrew,
 
 Mainly GNU radio.
 Or any other tool which may help.
 I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...
 
 Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
 Not very far away...
 https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1
 https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host
 
 Just need to do.
 Regards
 
 Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)
 
 2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich :
> What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> > On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot  
> > wrote:
> >
> > After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
> > I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version 14
> >
> > The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
> > No problem.
> > Found HackRF board 0:
> > USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
> > Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
> > Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
> >
> > However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be 
> > updated.
> > Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
> > Could you help please?
> > Thank you
> >
> > cuagn
> >
> > ___
> > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Marc Péquignot 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Marc Péquignot 
>> 
> 
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Andrew Rich]

It can be run from anywhere this command

No need to know a host directory. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Aug 2017, at 1:34 am, Marc Péquignot  wrote:
> 
> Andrew
> 
> Thank you for the precision. I was aware of this.
> The question (remark) should have been related to the host directory.
> After "sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config 
> libfftw3-dev", where is this host directory supposed to be?
> 
> Some explaination is missing.
> 
> With the unzip of "
> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/archive/master.zip"; I've it.
> 
> If I misunderstand something it is here.
> And explaination is welcome.
> Thank you for your help
> 
> 73
> 
> Marc, alias cuagn (F6dnh)
> 
> 
>> Le 04/08/2017 à 19:02, Andrew Rich a écrit :
>> Marc
>> 
>> cmake ..
>> 
>> Means in LINUX “cmake but go BACK one directory”
>> 
>> the double dot means go back one directory in LINUX
>> 
>> did it work ?
>> 
>> Andrew  
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4 Aug 2017, at 11:57 pm, Marc Péquignot  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just need to do...
>>> Not so easy.
>>> 
>>> It is said :
>>> "##How to build the host software on Linux:
>>> ###Prerequisites for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu): 
>>> sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config 
>>> libfftw3-dev
>>> ###Build host software on Linux:
>>> 
>>> mkdir host/build
>>> cd host/build
>>> cmake ..
>>> ..."
>>> 
>>> How cmake.. can do something in a newly and empty directory?
>>> Some information is missing
>>> I'm lost!
>>> Please help
>>> Marc , alias cuagn (F6dnh)
>>> My context :
>>> Ubuntu: 16.04.3 LTS
>>> Linux: 4.10.0-30-generic
>>> Gnuradio : 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2017-08-04 14:35 GMT+02:00 Marc Péquignot :
 Andrew,
 
 Mainly GNU radio.
 Or any other tool which may help.
 I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...
 
 Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
 Not very far away...
 https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1
 https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host
 
 Just need to do.
 Regards
 
 Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)
 
 2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich :
> What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> > On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot  
> > wrote:
> >
> > After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
> > I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version 14
> >
> > The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
> > No problem.
> > Found HackRF board 0:
> > USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
> > Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
> > Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
> >
> > However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be 
> > updated.
> > Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
> > Could you help please?
> > Thank you
> >
> > cuagn
> >
> > ___
> > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Marc Péquignot 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Marc Péquignot 
>> 
> 
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Andrew Rich]

apt-get knows where to put the files

Once it has finish u can check

sudo which cmake

The computer replies

/use/sbin/cmake

This is where the apt-get knew to put it

Does this help for you ?

A

Sent from my iPhone

> On 5 Aug 2017, at 1:34 am, Marc Péquignot  wrote:
> 
> Andrew
> 
> Thank you for the precision. I was aware of this.
> The question (remark) should have been related to the host directory.
> After "sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config 
> libfftw3-dev", where is this host directory supposed to be?
> 
> Some explaination is missing.
> 
> With the unzip of "
> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/archive/master.zip"; I've it.
> 
> If I misunderstand something it is here.
> And explaination is welcome.
> Thank you for your help
> 
> 73
> 
> Marc, alias cuagn (F6dnh)
> 
> 
>> Le 04/08/2017 à 19:02, Andrew Rich a écrit :
>> Marc
>> 
>> cmake ..
>> 
>> Means in LINUX “cmake but go BACK one directory”
>> 
>> the double dot means go back one directory in LINUX
>> 
>> did it work ?
>> 
>> Andrew  
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4 Aug 2017, at 11:57 pm, Marc Péquignot  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just need to do...
>>> Not so easy.
>>> 
>>> It is said :
>>> "##How to build the host software on Linux:
>>> ###Prerequisites for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu): 
>>> sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config 
>>> libfftw3-dev
>>> ###Build host software on Linux:
>>> 
>>> mkdir host/build
>>> cd host/build
>>> cmake ..
>>> ..."
>>> 
>>> How cmake.. can do something in a newly and empty directory?
>>> Some information is missing
>>> I'm lost!
>>> Please help
>>> Marc , alias cuagn (F6dnh)
>>> My context :
>>> Ubuntu: 16.04.3 LTS
>>> Linux: 4.10.0-30-generic
>>> Gnuradio : 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2017-08-04 14:35 GMT+02:00 Marc Péquignot :
 Andrew,
 
 Mainly GNU radio.
 Or any other tool which may help.
 I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...
 
 Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
 Not very far away...
 https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1
 https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host
 
 Just need to do.
 Regards
 
 Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)
 
 2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich :
> What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> > On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot  
> > wrote:
> >
> > After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
> > I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version 14
> >
> > The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
> > No problem.
> > Found HackRF board 0:
> > USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
> > Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
> > Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
> >
> > However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be 
> > updated.
> > Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
> > Could you help please?
> > Thank you
> >
> > cuagn
> >
> > ___
> > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Marc Péquignot 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Marc Péquignot 
>> 
> 
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Marc Péquignot]

Andrew

Thank you for the precision. I was aware of this.
The question (remark) should have been related to the host directory.
After "|sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev 
pkg-config libfftw3-dev", *where is this host directory supposed to be?*|


|Some explaination is missing.|

|With the unzip of "|
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/archive/master.zip 
" I've it.


If I misunderstand something it is here.
And explaination is welcome.

Thank you for your help

73

Marc, alias cuagn (F6dnh)



Le 04/08/2017 à 19:02, Andrew Rich a écrit :

Marc

cmake ..

Means in LINUX “cmake but go BACK one directory”

the double dot means go back one directory in LINUX

did it work ?

Andrew


On 4 Aug 2017, at 11:57 pm, Marc Péquignot > wrote:


Just need to do...
Not so easy.

It is said :

"##How to build the host software on Linux:
###Prerequisites for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu): |
sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev 
pkg-config libfftw3-dev|


###Build host software on Linux:

|mkdir host/build cd host/build cmake .. ..." |
|How cmake.. can do something in a newly and empty directory? |
|Some information is missing |
|I'm lost! |
|Please help |
|Marc , alias cuagn (F6dnh) |
|My context : Ubuntu: 16.04.3 LTS Linux: 4.10.0-30-generic Gnuradio : 
3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1 |




2017-08-04 14:35 GMT+02:00 Marc Péquignot >:


Andrew,

Mainly GNU radio.
Or any other tool which may help.
I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...

Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
Not very far away...
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1

https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host


Just need to do.
Regards

Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)

2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich mailto:vk4...@internode.on.net>>:

What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?

Andrew

> On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot
mailto:marc.pequig...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>
> After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
> I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my
old version 14
>
> The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
> No problem.
> Found HackRF board 0:
> USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
> Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
> Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
>
> However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need
also to be updated.
> Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
> Could you help please?
> Thank you
>
> cuagn
>
> ___
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com

> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev





-- 
Marc Péquignot





--
Marc Péquignot




___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Marc Péquignot]

Thank you Phil,

The installation has been done without any problem.
Need to test now new FW and drivers

I still don't understand the inconsistency between different parts of the
official repository.
The explanation given in https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host
is not the right one.

Fine to be helped by the community, but better should it be to avoid the
issue.

Thanks again

Marc, alias cuagn (F6dnh)


2017-08-04 16:07 GMT+02:00 Phil D :

> Download the files from git
>
> git clone https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf.git
>
> or download and extract https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/archive/
> master.zip
>
>
>
> On 4 August 2017 at 14:57, Marc Péquignot 
> wrote:
>
>> Just need to do...
>> Not so easy.
>>
>> It is said :
>>
>> "##How to build the host software on Linux:
>> ###Prerequisites for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu):
>> sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config
>> libfftw3-dev
>>
>> ###Build host software on Linux:
>>
>> mkdir host/build
>> cd host/build
>> cmake ..
>> ..."
>>
>> How cmake.. can do something in a newly and empty directory?
>>
>> Some information is missing
>>
>> I'm lost!
>>
>> Please help
>>
>> Marc , alias cuagn (F6dnh)
>>
>> My context :
>> Ubuntu: 16.04.3 LTS
>> Linux: 4.10.0-30-generic
>> Gnuradio : 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-08-04 14:35 GMT+02:00 Marc Péquignot :
>>
>>> Andrew,
>>>
>>> Mainly GNU radio.
>>> Or any other tool which may help.
>>> I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...
>>>
>>> Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
>>> Not very far away...
>>> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1
>>> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host
>>>
>>> Just need to do.
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)
>>>
>>> 2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich :
>>>
 What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?

 Andrew

 > On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot 
 wrote:
 >
 > After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
 > I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version
 14
 >
 > The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
 > No problem.
 > Found HackRF board 0:
 > USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
 > Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
 > Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
 >
 > However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be
 updated.
 > Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
 > Could you help please?
 > Thank you
 >
 > cuagn
 >
 > ___
 > HackRF-dev mailing list
 > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
 > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marc Péquignot
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marc Péquignot
>>
>> ___
>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>
>>
>


-- 
Marc Péquignot
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Marc Péquignot]

Just need to do...
Not so easy.

It is said :

"##How to build the host software on Linux:
###Prerequisites for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu):
sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake libusb-1.0-0-dev pkg-config
libfftw3-dev

###Build host software on Linux:

mkdir host/build
cd host/build
cmake ..
..."

How cmake.. can do something in a newly and empty directory?

Some information is missing

I'm lost!

Please help

Marc , alias cuagn (F6dnh)

My context :
Ubuntu: 16.04.3 LTS
Linux: 4.10.0-30-generic
Gnuradio : 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1




2017-08-04 14:35 GMT+02:00 Marc Péquignot :

> Andrew,
>
> Mainly GNU radio.
> Or any other tool which may help.
> I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...
>
> Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
> Not very far away...
> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1
> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host
>
> Just need to do.
> Regards
>
> Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)
>
> 2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich :
>
>> What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> > On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
>> > I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version 14
>> >
>> > The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
>> > No problem.
>> > Found HackRF board 0:
>> > USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
>> > Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
>> > Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
>> >
>> > However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be
>> updated.
>> > Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
>> > Could you help please?
>> > Thank you
>> >
>> > cuagn
>> >
>> > ___
>> > HackRF-dev mailing list
>> > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
>> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Marc Péquignot
>



-- 
Marc Péquignot
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Re: [Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Marc Péquignot]

Andrew,

Mainly GNU radio.
Or any other tool which may help.
I've been outside of hackrf for two years. Need to came back now...

Howerver, in the meean time I've found the answer to my question.
Not very far away...
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases/tag/v2017.02.1
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/host

Just need to do.
Regards

Marc alias cuagn (F6dnh)

2017-08-04 14:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Rich :

> What SW on Ubuntu are u going to use ?
>
> Andrew
>
> > On 4 Aug 2017, at 7:53 pm, Marc Péquignot 
> wrote:
> >
> > After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
> > I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version 14
> >
> > The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
> > No problem.
> > Found HackRF board 0:
> > USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
> > Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
> > Firmware Version: 2017.02.1
> >
> > However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be
> updated.
> > Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
> > Could you help please?
> > Thank you
> >
> > cuagn
> >
> > ___
> > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>
>


-- 
Marc Péquignot
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

[Hackrf-dev] Help to install last FW (hackrf_sweep) and related progs

[Marc Péquignot]

After a long time of inactivity, i decided to restart.
I've first installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as an upgrade of my old version 14

The I've upgraded the FW of my Hackrf-One.
No problem.
Found HackRF board 0:
USB descriptor string: 457863c8251f431f
Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
Firmware Version: 2017.02.1

However, I've read somewhere that a lib and a program need also to be
updated.
Which one? I'm not able to find again this info.
Could you help please?
Thank you

cuagn
___
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev