Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
We didnt find a solution because ex4550 (junos) code does not support 2 different families for the same interface (yet) ... Using 12.3R8 I think the new switches ex4600, ex4300 fiber and qfx5100 will support it considering junos ELS and it new hardware Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2015, at 18:01, Levi Pederson > wrote: > > Giuliano, > > I thank you for the prompt reply. I had originally thought that would create > a loop on the switch, but I believe you are right in that it will just shunt > the VLAN as anticipated. However, I was wondering if there was a a solution > that can be accomplished without having to use a loop-cable? > > Thank you, > > > Levi Pederson > Mankato Networks LLC > cell | 612.481.0769 > work | 612.787.7392 > levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net > > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Giuliano (WZTECH) >> wrote: >> We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in a >> optical cable loop ... One that came from a trunk interface ... Family >> ethernet-switching and other family mpls with L2-circuit to do a vlan >> traffic to enter in a mpls interface >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Mar 6, 2015, at 17:51, Levi Pederson >> > wrote: >> > >> > All, >> > >> > I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. >> > >> > They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring >> > situation. >> > >> > I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. >> > However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to >> > proceed. >> > >> > Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the >> > port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. >> > >> > The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a >> > trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a >> > vlan-tagged MX-10. >> > >> > I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. >> > >> > Thank you, >> > >> > *Levi Pederson* >> > Mankato Networks LLC >> > cell | 612.481.0769 >> > work | 612.787.7392 >> > levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net >> > ___ >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
Giuliano, I thank you for the prompt reply. I had originally thought that would create a loop on the switch, but I believe you are right in that it will just shunt the VLAN as anticipated. However, I was wondering if there was a a solution that can be accomplished without having to use a loop-cable? Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Giuliano (WZTECH) wrote: > We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in > a optical cable loop ... One that came from a trunk interface ... Family > ethernet-switching and other family mpls with L2-circuit to do a vlan > traffic to enter in a mpls interface > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 6, 2015, at 17:51, Levi Pederson < > levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. > > > > They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring > > situation. > > > > I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. > > However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to > proceed. > > > > Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying > the > > port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. > > > > The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a > > trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a > > vlan-tagged MX-10. > > > > I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. > > > > Thank you, > > > > *Levi Pederson* > > Mankato Networks LLC > > cell | 612.481.0769 > > work | 612.787.7392 > > levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net > > ___ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in a optical cable loop ... One that came from a trunk interface ... Family ethernet-switching and other family mpls with L2-circuit to do a vlan traffic to enter in a mpls interface Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2015, at 17:51, Levi Pederson > wrote: > > All, > > I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. > > They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring > situation. > > I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. > However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to proceed. > > Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the > port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. > > The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a > trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a > vlan-tagged MX-10. > > I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. > > Thank you, > > *Levi Pederson* > Mankato Networks LLC > cell | 612.481.0769 > work | 612.787.7392 > levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
All, I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring situation. I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to proceed. Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a vlan-tagged MX-10. I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX and VZ FIOS question
On 6/Mar/15 16:48, Chris Evans wrote: > Thanks.. Exactly the answer that I was looking.. Just needed to know > the feature/solution name so I can go research it. > > Found this > doc: > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/solutions/information-products/pathway-pages/solutions/8010092-en.pdf > > IPoE would be what it is. > > Another Example: > http://rickmur.com/bras-on-juniper-mx/ Yes, IPoE is the industry marketing term that used to float around a lot. I prefer the DHCP term :-). Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX and VZ FIOS question
Thanks.. Exactly the answer that I was looking.. Just needed to know the feature/solution name so I can go research it. Found this doc: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/solutions/information-products/pathway-pages/solutions/8010092-en.pdf IPoE would be what it is. Another Example: http://rickmur.com/bras-on-juniper-mx/ On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 6/Mar/15 00:34, Chris Evans wrote: > > I'm a FIOS user and they use Juniper MX in many locations (along with E > > series in older installs) and I'm curious of a typical configuration > they'd > > be using. WIth FIOS I just have a straight ethernet connection, no > logging > > in, no providing user information, etc.. > > > > So since i'm not logging in would that still be a BRAS configuration? > > Also they have a feature enabled that poisons ARP entries if you try to > put > > a box on the wire that has a different IP than what your DHCP lease is > > given you. What feature would that be? > > > > Very curious how they'd do this. I've only worked with JUNOS boxes in the > > enterprise so I don't have experience with features like this. > > Yes, it would still be a BNG solution, but using DHCP (in lieu of PPPoE). > > Authentication could be based on several things such as MAC address, > VLAN ID, switch/OLT port, or a combination of them. > > The MX as a BNG supports DHCP subscriber management. I'm sure the ERX > does too. > > Personally, I prefer DHCP to PPPoE. > > Mark. > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX4500 SFP+ laser lit when interface is admin down and vice versa
Hi, I've got an EX4500 running 12.3R8.7 that has a port that's misbehaving in a rather odd way: If I disable the interface in the config and commit, the laser is turned on (normal Tx levels in show interfaces diagnostics optics). If I re-enable the interface and commit, the laser is switched off (Tx level of -Inf dBm). So it's doing precisely the opposite of what I'd expect it to. When I commit the configuration that enables the interface, the following message is logged: chassism[1405]: Tx Disable called for port: 0, enable: 0 I've tried multiple SFP+ modules and they all behave the same. Also I've tried re-seating the SFP+ with as many different combinations of the interface being disabled/enabled when I remove/insert the module as I could think of, no luck. Finally it's only impacting port 0, e.g., port 4 works as expected (i.e., Tx off when interface is disabled and on when enabled) - even with the very same module that don't work right when inserted in port 0. Anyone seen anything like that? I'm hoping to find a way fix it without needing a maintenance window to reboot it. Tore ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp