[leaf-devel] Wireless Community Networks
Everyone, Have we been able to package NoCatSplash yet? I think wireless community networks are going to grow considerably in the future. NoCatSplash captive portal pre-release http://leaf-project.org/article.php?sid=79 Building Wireless Community Networks, 2nd Edition http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/wirelesscommnet2/ FreeNetworks.org http://freenetworks.org/ -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Addendum to "Q&D LRP package how-to"
Jon, Please update the document in CVS. Thanks. docid_1460.html http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/doc/docmanager/ On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 09:20, Jon Clausen wrote: > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1460&group_id=13751 > > Section 5: > > "Trick" LRP into thinking your package is installed by editing > /var/lib/lrpkg/packages, and adding your package name to the bottom of the > list. The name here should match the portion of the files you > created earlier, and will be what your LRP package is backed up as. If you > are using apkg instead, then you can skip this step. > > Section 6: > > You are now ready to ``create'' your LRP package. Just do a backup of your > package from lrcfg and you will have .lrp created for you on your > disk drive. If you don't have a backup option for your package, you didn't > do step 5 correctly. > > Problem is, step 5 is not enough if you're working on Bering: > > One also has to declare the package in the file /var/lib/lrpkg/backdisk in > order for the package to show up in lrcfg. > > So I'd suggest adding something like the following to Section 5; > > > "Note that if you're working on Bering, you also have to declare your new > package in /var/lib/lrpkg/backdisk, which controls the destination of the > packages. Follow the syntax of the other lines in there." > > > - or something to that effect. > > I should mention that the above is something I noticed while making a > package on Bering 1.0_rc2 (I think), and I haven't checked whether it still > holds true on later releases... -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[leaf-devel] Addendum to "Q&D LRP package how-to"
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1460&group_id=13751 Section 5: "Trick" LRP into thinking your package is installed by editing /var/lib/lrpkg/packages, and adding your package name to the bottom of the list. The name here should match the portion of the files you created earlier, and will be what your LRP package is backed up as. If you are using apkg instead, then you can skip this step. Section 6: You are now ready to ``create'' your LRP package. Just do a backup of your package from lrcfg and you will have .lrp created for you on your disk drive. If you don't have a backup option for your package, you didn't do step 5 correctly. Problem is, step 5 is not enough if you're working on Bering: One also has to declare the package in the file /var/lib/lrpkg/backdisk in order for the package to show up in lrcfg. So I'd suggest adding something like the following to Section 5; "Note that if you're working on Bering, you also have to declare your new package in /var/lib/lrpkg/backdisk, which controls the destination of the packages. Follow the syntax of the other lines in there." - or something to that effect. I should mention that the above is something I noticed while making a package on Bering 1.0_rc2 (I think), and I haven't checked whether it still holds true on later releases... CMIIW Cheers, Jon Clausen -- Whatever rocks your boat! --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Platform
Charles At 06:41 25.07.2003 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: ...oops! Forgot to send to the list. Erich Titl wrote: If anyone has a deeper insight what exactly this system call will do please holler. I can't help much, but you might want to ask on the busybox list. There are frequent questions/problems with halt/reboot support in busybox, especially when running on various embedded systems. Thanks for the info. I might dig a bit in the busybox site. The developer of the WRAP system suggests to use the SC1100 watchdog to reboot the system without even thinking about the keyboard controller. I quite like the idea because the built in HW watchdog strobes the reset line when not reset, this would make it a fine recovery should Bering ever freeze. Thanks Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Platform
...oops! Forgot to send to the list. Erich Titl wrote: If anyone has a deeper insight what exactly this system call will do please holler. I can't help much, but you might want to ask on the busybox list. There are frequent questions/problems with halt/reboot support in busybox, especially when running on various embedded systems. -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF Platform
Mohan. List
At 08:45 25.07.2003 +0530, S Mohan wrote:
Eric:
init 6 invokes reboot with the arguements, is it? or giving reboot -d -f -i
does the job without keyboard controller?
I had a look at the reboot (halt) code..
-i forces the network interfaces down by issuing an ifdown call
-f forces a hard shutdown but does not really anything significant in the code
-d inhibits writing of a wtmp record
none of these have anything to do with the actual reboot system call, so no
luck.
looking at the code the follwing is apparent
reboot is called with the magic 0x01234567 which according to the docs
should result in
LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART
(RB_AUTOBOOT, 0x1234567). The message `Restarting
system.' is printed, and a default restart is per-
formed immediately. If not preceded by a sync(2),
data will be lost.
digging deeper into the kernel this finally goes to process.c which tries
to reset.
this is from process.c..
if(!reboot_thru_bios) {
/* rebooting needs to touch the page at absolute addr 0 */
*((unsigned short *)__va(0x472)) = reboot_mode;
for (;;) {
int i;
for (i=0; i<100; i++) {
kb_wait();
udelay(50);
outb(0xfe,0x64); /* pulse reset low */
udelay(50);
}
/* That didn't work - force a triple fault.. */
__asm__ __volatile__("lidt %0": :"m" (no_idt));
__asm__ __volatile__("int3");
}
}
machine_real_restart(jump_to_bios, sizeof(jump_to_bios));
the call to kb_wait() seems to indicate that in the case of a hard reboot
(!reboot_thru_bios) the keyboard plays a role.
If anyone has a deeper insight what exactly this system call will do please
holler.
Thanks
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
