Re: [LegacyUG] filing system for genealogy

2012-11-05 Thread MJ
C.N.
   since a picture is worth a thousand words, I uploaded some pictures to my 
blog about organizing documents, you can find them 
here: http://foundingfamilylines.blogspot.com/search/label/jump%20drives  If 
you have any questions, glad to help further.  I find that with Legacy I keep 
relevant documents on a jump drive that I back up to drop box.  I sort by 
surname, then family
Have a great day! 
Mary Jane  http://allwrappedup4u.blogspot.com/
http://foundingfamilylines.blogspot.com


- Original Message -
From: Gmail 
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 8:28 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] filing system for genealogy

I have been using the Legacy genealogy program for many years, but I am now 
struggling with how to think through scanning all of my papers to become 
paperless by 40 feet of papers as I prepare to move from my home to an 
apartment with much less room.

The scanner I have purchased, an Epson GT-S50 which uses the Nuance Paper Port 
11.

I don't have any question about the scanner or program, but about how to 
organize my papers so that I will e able to find each page I scan.  Yes, this 
is an organizational question!  I am open to all suggestions to find one that 
will suit me best.

I am 74 years young and I do struggle with electronics as I was not born with 
any pc genes, as my grandchildren seem to have:)

If there are earlier discussion on this subject, please advise so that 
information is not repeated, or please e-mail me directly to:
fergusresearc...@gmail.com

Thanking you in advance!

C.N. Russell





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] filing system for genealogy

2012-11-05 Thread Wendy Howard
Geoff did a webinar on digital imaging a while back where he talked
about his filing system; you might find that helpful.  Look for
"Organizing and Sharing Digital Images" dated 29 February 2012 at
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/webinars.asp

Dick Eastman sometimes mentions how he's gone "paperless" in his blog -
you may be able to pick up some tips from him.  Try
http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2011/12/why-i-went-paperless.html

Hope this helps.  :-)

Kind Regards,
Wendy



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

2012-11-05 Thread Brian/Support
The include all sources check box has no impact on what parts of a
source is included in the GEDCOM. That setting is there more for when
you are only exporting part of your file. If that is not checked only
the sources linked to the individuals in the export will be included. If
it is checked all sources will be included, even though some may not be
used by the portion of the file you are exporting.

There is no way, other than editing the output GEDCOM, to remove/exclude
part of a source that is going to be included.

To clarify the SOUR and PAGE tags. The SOUR contains the information
about the Master Source. The PAGE tag contains, as you indicated, the
Source detail entered for a particular fact for a person.

Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
--

On 05/11/2012 19:20, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> Upon further review..
>
> It turns out that my email correspondent was referring to a WorldConnect 
> GEDCOM report and not one of Legacy's Book Reports on my own domain web site. 
> I've also confirmed that Legacy seems to be correctly displaying or not 
> displaying the Comments tab depending whether the user has checked the box or 
> not. This particular master source was one of my old Basic sources and not SW 
> but I don't think that makes any difference. What determines whether the 
> comments get included on a Legacy generated report all depends on the state 
> of the check box.
>
> OK, so now my attention was turned to my customized GEDCOM. Examining it, I 
> see I've included two items: PAGE (Source Detail) and SOUR (Source). 
> Admittedly I'm not quite sure of the difference between those two parameters. 
> I then noticed something on the main GEDCOM Export window. Because I'm 
> exporting to WorldConnect, I select GEDCOM 5.5.1 Only. I then click on 
> Customize to load my customized .GEL file and then save the exported file as 
> usual. But I noticed something important. By default, if the GEDCOM export to 
> Legacy is selected, the checkbox "Override Source Options --- include all 
> Source Information" is checked as one would expect. When I switch the option 
> to export GEDCOM 5.5.1, THAT CHECKBOX REMAINED CHECKED !
>
> Aha! That must be why I'm getting all the comment info exported to 
> WorldConnect. My feeble brain does not remember if I ever checked that on 
> purpose or if it remains checked by default but I can see lots of problems 
> with it remaining checked --- just as my little problem points out. What if I 
> had a comment about old Aunt Betsy who I said was a nasty old gossip and a 
> terrible . Even though I had the checkbox on 
> the comments tab of the master source to NOT print these comments in Legacy 
> generated reports, it appears that these supposedly  comments get 
> exported to a GEDCOM if one overlooks the fact that this seemingly 
> un-important checkbox remains checked.
>
> OK, so the solution would seem to be to UN-CHECK the box. I did that and 
> uploaded my new GEDCOM to WorldConnect. There is no joy in Mudville as the 
> Comments are still exported in spite of the checkbox being cleared.
>
> So now this thread has two questions:
>   1. Just what does this Checkbox do? Why are comments still exported if 
> it is cleared?
>   2. How do I export a GEDCOM with the Comments of a source suppressed?
>
>
> Brian in CA
>
> Problem can be viewed here:  
> http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=brianlightfoot&id=I853
> Scroll down to the Sources at the bottom and look and #1 and #2
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:13 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
>
> I tried to test this but I was not able to duplicate the addition/inclusion 
> of Master Source Comments in web pages.
>
> To confirm this as an error I need to know some details of the web pages you 
> created with Legacy.
> What is the web page style (Ancestor, Descendant, Pedigree, Family Group or 
> Individual On the Other tab what are your selections for the sources On 
> separate page, each individual's page, Do you include the repository, 
> recorded dates, file ID and surety?
>
> Brian
> Customer Support
> Millennia Corporation
> br...@legacyfamilytree.com
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] filing system for genealogy

2012-11-05 Thread Marg Strong
Just a couple of thoughts. There are software programs that tag images with 
keywords and these could be used to find documents.

I have all my documents scanned, though I keep paper copies also. The scanned 
docs are filed in directories and sub-directories. For instance: the McLean 
family directory; under that: each married couple in the family (unmarried 
adult children would stay in their parent's folder. In fact, until I have 
enough files, I keep the children there until I feel I'm ready to give them 
their own folder.) Under each couple's directory are sub directories for 
"census," "birth records," death records, photos" etc, as well as a directory 
for text files where I summarize and theorize. A correspondence directory and a 
local history directory could go under the more general family directory unless 
there is a lot for one marriage family. So far this has worked for me. I also 
try to transcribe my records when I have time, and that would be the same file 
name with the initials TR at the end.

Don't know if this is what you are looking for, but hopefully it will help.





>
> From: Gmail 
>To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 7:28 PM
>Subject: [LegacyUG] filing system for genealogy
>
>I have been using the Legacy genealogy program for many years, but I am now 
>struggling with how to think through scanning all of my papers to become 
>paperless by 40 feet of papers as I prepare to move from my home to an 
>apartment with much less room.
>
>The scanner I have purchased, an Epson GT-S50 which uses the Nuance Paper Port 
>11.
>
>I don't have any question about the scanner or program, but about how to 
>organize my papers so that I will e able to find each page I scan.  Yes, this 
>is an organizational question!  I am open to all suggestions to find one that 
>will suit me best.
>
>I am 74 years young and I do struggle with electronics as I was not born with 
>any pc genes, as my grandchildren seem to have:)
>
>If there are earlier discussion on this subject, please advise so that 
>information is not repeated, or please e-mail me directly to:
>fergusresearc...@gmail.com
>
>Thanking you in advance!
>
>C.N. Russell
>
>
>
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
>our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] filing system for genealogy

2012-11-05 Thread Gmail
I have been using the Legacy genealogy program for many years, but I am now 
struggling with how to think through scanning all of my papers to become 
paperless by 40 feet of papers as I prepare to move from my home to an 
apartment with much less room.

The scanner I have purchased, an Epson GT-S50 which uses the Nuance Paper Port 
11.

I don't have any question about the scanner or program, but about how to 
organize my papers so that I will e able to find each page I scan.  Yes, this 
is an organizational question!  I am open to all suggestions to find one that 
will suit me best.

I am 74 years young and I do struggle with electronics as I was not born with 
any pc genes, as my grandchildren seem to have:)

If there are earlier discussion on this subject, please advise so that 
information is not repeated, or please e-mail me directly to:
fergusresearc...@gmail.com

Thanking you in advance!

C.N. Russell





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




RE: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

2012-11-05 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
Upon further review..

It turns out that my email correspondent was referring to a WorldConnect GEDCOM 
report and not one of Legacy's Book Reports on my own domain web site. I've 
also confirmed that Legacy seems to be correctly displaying or not displaying 
the Comments tab depending whether the user has checked the box or not. This 
particular master source was one of my old Basic sources and not SW but I don't 
think that makes any difference. What determines whether the comments get 
included on a Legacy generated report all depends on the state of the check box.

OK, so now my attention was turned to my customized GEDCOM. Examining it, I see 
I've included two items: PAGE (Source Detail) and SOUR (Source). Admittedly I'm 
not quite sure of the difference between those two parameters. I then noticed 
something on the main GEDCOM Export window. Because I'm exporting to 
WorldConnect, I select GEDCOM 5.5.1 Only. I then click on Customize to load my 
customized .GEL file and then save the exported file as usual. But I noticed 
something important. By default, if the GEDCOM export to Legacy is selected, 
the checkbox "Override Source Options --- include all Source Information" is 
checked as one would expect. When I switch the option to export GEDCOM 5.5.1, 
THAT CHECKBOX REMAINED CHECKED !

Aha! That must be why I'm getting all the comment info exported to 
WorldConnect. My feeble brain does not remember if I ever checked that on 
purpose or if it remains checked by default but I can see lots of problems with 
it remaining checked --- just as my little problem points out. What if I had a 
comment about old Aunt Betsy who I said was a nasty old gossip and a terrible 
. Even though I had the checkbox on the comments 
tab of the master source to NOT print these comments in Legacy generated 
reports, it appears that these supposedly  comments get exported to a 
GEDCOM if one overlooks the fact that this seemingly un-important checkbox 
remains checked.

OK, so the solution would seem to be to UN-CHECK the box. I did that and 
uploaded my new GEDCOM to WorldConnect. There is no joy in Mudville as the 
Comments are still exported in spite of the checkbox being cleared.

So now this thread has two questions:
 1. Just what does this Checkbox do? Why are comments still exported if it 
is cleared?
 2. How do I export a GEDCOM with the Comments of a source suppressed?


Brian in CA

Problem can be viewed here:  
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=brianlightfoot&id=I853
Scroll down to the Sources at the bottom and look and #1 and #2





-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

I tried to test this but I was not able to duplicate the addition/inclusion of 
Master Source Comments in web pages.

To confirm this as an error I need to know some details of the web pages you 
created with Legacy.
What is the web page style (Ancestor, Descendant, Pedigree, Family Group or 
Individual On the Other tab what are your selections for the sources On 
separate page, each individual's page, Do you include the repository, recorded 
dates, file ID and surety?

Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
--

On 05/11/2012 16:37, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> It's interesting that this should come up right after the recent discussion.
> I was just contacted by a person whose name and address appear as a
> source in a report on my online tree and while he has no objection to
> the name, he'd like the address removed. I'm totally in agreement and
> have indicated my intention. But in looking at the master source which
> bears his name, I see that I added his address and email address on
> the Comments tab of the Master Source definition.
>
> I've checked each individual to which this master source applies and
> there is nothing about the source's address in the details. The
> address only appears on the Comments tab of the master source
> definition. The "Include on Reports" of the Comments tab is NOT
> checked but Legacy put it out there on the ancestor and descendant
> book types of reports as well as a pedigree report.
>
> At the bottom of the comments tab there is another check box to
> Exclude this Master Source from Reports but that is not what I want to
> do. I only want to exclude the info on the Comments tab. I would like
> to keep the address and email address within my records of the master
> source but where should it be so that it doesn't appear on reports. In
> the meanwhile, I'm going to run some test reports to see if this "bug"
> applies to all types of reports, or more than likely something goofy I did 
> when I prepared the reports.





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.m

Re: [LegacyUG] Locations

2012-11-05 Thread Anne Hollingshead

  Most of my ancestors are UK or AUS and I use the four part
  solution and I use a hyphen to the place name.


  I find that this works well in my location list for sorting and
  checking.


  My main problem is getting rid of the two commas in reports.


  I do hope Version 8 has a delete two commas anywhere option.


  Anne



On 6/11/2012 9:44 AM, Tony Rolfe wrote:
> Hi, Sherry
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> If I understand correctly, the reasons for doing it the "correct" way
> are because a well-established book says so, Sort doesn't work properly
> and the Expand/contract parts won't work.
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Question re: Picture Gallery

2012-11-05 Thread Terri Brown
I've not tried printing photos from Legacy but according to the Help file, you 
can only print ALL photos from the Picture Gallery > Photo Album.
 
Try View > Scrapbook and see if that will work for you. See the Help file under 
Picture Scrapbook Options.
 
Terri



 From: Kay Keating 
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 9:38 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Question re: Picture Gallery

Hello,  Is there a way to selectively print photos when printing out a
Photo Album?  I have stored some documents that I don't want printed
in the albums for some people.  OR is there a way to create a second
album?  KAY



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Cdn Tax records

2012-11-05 Thread Ron Ferguson
Charles,

>From what you have written it would seem that they are important to you
because “they evidence so many details of of my personal employment 
history”.
What you are saying, therefore, is that they are a source for your
employment history. It follows that they should be used as a Source.

BTW. I’d keep the details private :-)

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


From: charles.a.di...@sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 10:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Cdn Tax records

I have Canadian Income tax returns from 1952 thru 2011 and because they
evidence so many details of of my personal employment history I would like
to record this in my Legacy file.
I would appreciation any recommendations you can give me to facilitate the
recording of this info.

Respectfully,
Charles A. Dixon





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] Cdn Tax records

2012-11-05 Thread charles.a.dixon
I have Canadian Income tax returns from 1952 thru 2011 and because they 
evidence so many details of of my personal employment history I would like to 
record this in my Legacy file.
I would appreciation any recommendations you can give me to facilitate the 
recording of this info.
Respectfully,
Charles A. Dixon



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Locations

2012-11-05 Thread Tony Rolfe
Hi, Sherry

Thanks for the clarification.

If I understand correctly, the reasons for doing it the "correct" way
are because a well-established book says so, Sort doesn't work properly
and the Expand/contract parts won't work.

The book, although I haven't read it, is probably geared mainly towards
the American system and I gave up on the four field convention ages ago
because it simply doesn't work in the UK and Australia where most of my
events happened.

Sorting right-to-left works perfectly.  I simply can't imagine sorting
left to right.  All towns with the same name from around the world will
sort together.

I never use expand/contract so that doesn't matter.

Your suggestion to use the description and notes fields would be good,
it they weren't already jammed full of other things.  Almost all my
event sentences use Notes and Description for other things, leaving only
the location field for the full address.  That was one of the factors
driving my event sentence redesign suggestion, which seems to have
withered on the vine.

Thanks again for the clarification, but I think I'll keep doing it the
"incorrect" way.

Cheers

Tony




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

2012-11-05 Thread Ron Ferguson
Richard, Brian,

Turning off the printing of the Repository would also turn it off for all 
sources, if I understand you correctly, Richard.

Brian, which type of source are you using – Basic or SW? I have just had a look 
at one of mine which uses the Basic source and the comments are not printing. 
If you are using SW please let us know and I will run a test.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


From: R G Strong-genes
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 9:48 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

Brian,
You could add his name and address as a new repository and attach his 
repository to the master source then when you create the reports you can turn 
off printing of the repository. Also if you are creating your website from a 
GEDCOM you can change how the sources are exported, I believe the default is to 
show all source info also you can suppress address info from the gedcom if they 
are using the address fields. Making him a repository is the easiest way of not 
showing his address in sources.


From: Brian L. Lightfoot
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 4:37 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

It’s interesting that this should come up right after the recent discussion. I 
was just contacted by a person whose name and address appear as a source in a 
report on my online tree and while he has no objection to the name, he’d like 
the address removed. I’m totally in agreement and have indicated my intention. 
But in looking at the master source which bears his name, I see that I added 
his address and email address on the Comments tab of the Master Source 
definition.



I’ve checked each individual to which this master source applies and there is 
nothing about the source’s address in the details. The address only appears on 
the Comments tab of the master source definition. The “Include on Reports” of 
the Comments tab is NOT checked but Legacy put it out there on the ancestor and 
descendant book types of reports as well as a pedigree report.



At the bottom of the comments tab there is another check box to Exclude this 
Master Source from Reports but that is not what I want to do. I only want to 
exclude the info on the Comments tab. I would like to keep the address and 
email address within my records of the master source but where should it be so 
that it doesn’t appear on reports. In the meanwhile, I’m going to run some test 
reports to see if this “bug” applies to all types of reports, or more than 
likely something goofy I did when I prepared the reports.




--
Russell G. Strong
P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today! This full featured genealogy program 
can be downloaded FREE at
http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/Articles.asp?ID=133&Click=1114
Oh so many branches and not enough time to check out all the roots!!!.
Check out my Genealogy Pages at http://www.rgstrong-genes.com .


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

2012-11-05 Thread Brian/Support
I tried to test this but I was not able to duplicate the
addition/inclusion of Master Source Comments in web pages.

To confirm this as an error I need to know some details of the web pages
you created with Legacy.
What is the web page style (Ancestor, Descendant, Pedigree, Family Group
or Individual
On the Other tab what are your selections for the sources
On separate page, each individual's page, Do you include the repository,
recorded dates, file ID and surety?

Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
--

On 05/11/2012 16:37, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> It's interesting that this should come up right after the recent discussion.
> I was just contacted by a person whose name and address appear as a source
> in a report on my online tree and while he has no objection to the name,
> he'd like the address removed. I'm totally in agreement and have indicated
> my intention. But in looking at the master source which bears his name, I
> see that I added his address and email address on the Comments tab of the
> Master Source definition.
>
> I've checked each individual to which this master source applies and there
> is nothing about the source's address in the details. The address only
> appears on the Comments tab of the master source definition. The "Include on
> Reports" of the Comments tab is NOT checked but Legacy put it out there on
> the ancestor and descendant book types of reports as well as a pedigree
> report.
>
> At the bottom of the comments tab there is another check box to Exclude this
> Master Source from Reports but that is not what I want to do. I only want to
> exclude the info on the Comments tab. I would like to keep the address and
> email address within my records of the master source but where should it be
> so that it doesn't appear on reports. In the meanwhile, I'm going to run
> some test reports to see if this "bug" applies to all types of reports, or
> more than likely something goofy I did when I prepared the reports.



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited

2012-11-05 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 05/11/2012 21:37, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> It’s interesting that this should come up right after the recent
> discussion. I was just contacted by a person whose name and address
> appear as a source in a report on my online tree and while he has no
> objection to the name, he’d like the address removed. I’m totally in
> agreement and have indicated my intention. But in looking at the master
> source which bears his name, I see that I added his address and email
> address on the Comments tab of the Master Source definition.
>
> I’ve checked each individual to which this master source applies and
> there is nothing about the source’s address in the details. The address
> only appears on the Comments tab of the master source definition. The
> “Include on Reports” of the Comments tab is NOT checked but Legacy put
> it out there on the ancestor and descendant book types of reports as
> well as a pedigree report.
>
> At the bottom of the comments tab there is another check box to Exclude
> this Master Source from Reports but that is not what I want to do. I
> only want to exclude the info on the Comments tab. I would like to keep
> the address and email address within my records of the master source but
> where should it be so that it doesn’t appear on reports. In the
> meanwhile, I’m going to run some test reports to see if this “bug”
> applies to all types of reports, or more than likely something goofy I
> did when I prepared the reports.
>

I have just run 2 different Book Reports and the Comments appeared or
not just as they ought.  When I checked "Include on Reports" my comments
appeared and when I unchecked it they didn't.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Locations

2012-11-05 Thread Nut
On 11/5/2012 8:11 AM, Sherry/Support wrote:
> If you follow the suggestions in "Getting It Right" by Mary H.
> Slawson, only the governmental jurisdictions will be included in the
> location field.  Those are city/town, county, state and country.
>
> Including more than that, separated by commas from the city/town
> (street address, city, county, state or cemetery name, city, county
> state) makes it impossible to properly sort locations in the Master
> Location List and the Expand/Contract Location Parts can't correctly
> do its job.
>
> I would put what you're referring to in Events - using the
> "Description" field for the cemetery name, street address, etc and any
> other information in the Notes (grave site, etc).
>
> The Event Sentence reads:
>
> He was buried in the Mountain View Cemetery at Dillon,
> Beaveryhead,Montana, United States on 29 Sept 2007"
>
> or
>
> He resided at 123 Main Street from 1958 to 1996 in City, County, State
>
>
> Of course you can always edit the Event Sentence Definition if you
> don't like the order they print out on.
>
> I know we should use the Event addresses for birth, bap/chr, death,
> burial, marriage, etc, but since that's not as useful as the Master
> Event when reporting, I prefer the event. I'd love to find out if the
> programmers are making the event addresses more useful for reports
> beyond a simple list of who uses it or creating a Search List to print
> a report from that list.
>
> Many people are happy with their detailed address or cemetery or
> building name in the locations - it's up to you but not everything
> will work correctly if you add that, separating with commas.

I had the book mentioned above and gave it away, however I have quite a
bookshelf with genealogy books, that suggest as Sherry mentions as far
as location entries. Personally the balance of the information are put
in events or at least notes.

Looking through the archives, I found and like the entry by Brian Lightfoot.
"Tool to Uniformly Format Places" 6/7/2010. I was looking for how others
were entering Location Locations.

--
//Nut

>
> Sincerely,
> Sherry
> Technical Support
> Legacy Family Tree
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Tony Rolfe  wrote:
>> >On 04 November 2012 00:46 Sherry/Support said:
>> >
>> >"If you put the cemetery name in the location field (which we don't
>> >recommend for several reasons)"
>> >
>> >Sherry, can you please clarify this?
>> >
>> >I have all details in locations. Street numbers and Street names, Church
>> >names, Cemetery names etc. with each field separated by commas.
>> >
>> >My biggest includes grave number, section number, Cemetery name, street
>> >address, town, county, England.
>> >
>> >I'm not having any problems that I'm aware of, but I can geolocate
>> >everything and it keeps everything together.
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >
>> >Tony



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Locations

2012-11-05 Thread Bruce Jones
Two comments.
1. Regarding the sorting of the Master Location List, I change the sort
order to sort from Right to Left, so it doesn't matter how many fields I
have.
2. If I don't put the address in the location, I can't map out the
different houses, in the same city, I have lived in.  Or am I missing
something.

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Sherry/Support
wrote:

> If you follow the suggestions in "Getting It Right" by Mary H.
> Slawson, only the governmental jurisdictions will be included in the
> location field.  Those are city/town, county, state and country.
>
> Including more than that, separated by commas from the city/town
> (street address, city, county, state or cemetery name, city, county
> state) makes it impossible to properly sort locations in the Master
> Location List and the Expand/Contract Location Parts can't correctly
> do its job.
>
> I would put what you're referring to in Events - using the
> "Description" field for the cemetery name, street address, etc and any
> other information in the Notes (grave site, etc).
>
> The Event Sentence reads:
>
> He was buried in the Mountain View Cemetery at Dillon,
> Beaveryhead,Montana, United States on 29 Sept 2007"
>
> or
>
> He resided at 123 Main Street from 1958 to 1996 in City, County, State
>
>
> Of course you can always edit the Event Sentence Definition if you
> don't like the order they print out on.
>
> I know we should use the Event addresses for birth, bap/chr, death,
> burial, marriage, etc, but since that's not as useful as the Master
> Event when reporting, I prefer the event. I'd love to find out if the
> programmers are making the event addresses more useful for reports
> beyond a simple list of who uses it or creating a Search List to print
> a report from that list.
>
> Many people are happy with their detailed address or cemetery or
> building name in the locations - it's up to you but not everything
> will work correctly if you add that, separating with commas.
>
> Sincerely,
> Sherry
> Technical Support
> Legacy Family Tree
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Tony Rolfe 
> wrote:
> > On 04 November 2012 00:46 Sherry/Support said:
> >
> > "If you put the cemetery name in the location field (which we don't
> > recommend for several reasons)"
> >
> > Sherry, can you please clarify this?
> >
> > I have all details in locations. Street numbers and Street names, Church
> > names, Cemetery names etc. with each field separated by commas.
> >
> > My biggest includes grave number, section number, Cemetery name, street
> > address, town, county, England.
> >
> > I'm not having any problems that I'm aware of, but I can geolocate
> > everything and it keeps everything together.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Tony
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



RE: [LegacyUG] Locations

2012-11-05 Thread Michele Lewis
What Sherry said :)

Michele


-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 10:11 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Locations

If you follow the suggestions in "Getting It Right" by Mary H.
Slawson, only the governmental jurisdictions will be included in the location 
field.  Those are city/town, county, state and country.

Including more than that, separated by commas from the city/town (street 
address, city, county, state or cemetery name, city, county
state) makes it impossible to properly sort locations in the Master Location 
List and the Expand/Contract Location Parts can't correctly do its job.

I would put what you're referring to in Events - using the "Description" field 
for the cemetery name, street address, etc and any other information in the 
Notes (grave site, etc).

The Event Sentence reads:

He was buried in the Mountain View Cemetery at Dillon, Beaveryhead,Montana, 
United States on 29 Sept 2007"

or

He resided at 123 Main Street from 1958 to 1996 in City, County, State


Of course you can always edit the Event Sentence Definition if you don't like 
the order they print out on.

I know we should use the Event addresses for birth, bap/chr, death, burial, 
marriage, etc, but since that's not as useful as the Master Event when 
reporting, I prefer the event. I'd love to find out if the programmers are 
making the event addresses more useful for reports beyond a simple list of who 
uses it or creating a Search List to print a report from that list.

Many people are happy with their detailed address or cemetery or building name 
in the locations - it's up to you but not everything will work correctly if you 
add that, separating with commas.

Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Locations

2012-11-05 Thread Sherry/Support
If you follow the suggestions in "Getting It Right" by Mary H.
Slawson, only the governmental jurisdictions will be included in the
location field.  Those are city/town, county, state and country.

Including more than that, separated by commas from the city/town
(street address, city, county, state or cemetery name, city, county
state) makes it impossible to properly sort locations in the Master
Location List and the Expand/Contract Location Parts can't correctly
do its job.

I would put what you're referring to in Events - using the
"Description" field for the cemetery name, street address, etc and any
other information in the Notes (grave site, etc).

The Event Sentence reads:

He was buried in the Mountain View Cemetery at Dillon,
Beaveryhead,Montana, United States on 29 Sept 2007"

or

He resided at 123 Main Street from 1958 to 1996 in City, County, State


Of course you can always edit the Event Sentence Definition if you
don't like the order they print out on.

I know we should use the Event addresses for birth, bap/chr, death,
burial, marriage, etc, but since that's not as useful as the Master
Event when reporting, I prefer the event. I'd love to find out if the
programmers are making the event addresses more useful for reports
beyond a simple list of who uses it or creating a Search List to print
a report from that list.

Many people are happy with their detailed address or cemetery or
building name in the locations - it's up to you but not everything
will work correctly if you add that, separating with commas.

Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree


On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Tony Rolfe  wrote:
> On 04 November 2012 00:46 Sherry/Support said:
>
> "If you put the cemetery name in the location field (which we don't
> recommend for several reasons)"
>
> Sherry, can you please clarify this?
>
> I have all details in locations. Street numbers and Street names, Church
> names, Cemetery names etc. with each field separated by commas.
>
> My biggest includes grave number, section number, Cemetery name, street
> address, town, county, England.
>
> I'm not having any problems that I'm aware of, but I can geolocate
> everything and it keeps everything together.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tony



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] Question re: Picture Gallery

2012-11-05 Thread Kay Keating
Hello,  Is there a way to selectively print photos when printing out a
Photo Album?  I have stored some documents that I don't want printed
in the albums for some people.  OR is there a way to create a second
album?  KAY



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp