RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Milijas needs time in the team. He will come good. Our most creative player and hopefully one of our highest paid player's!! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 9:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED One of the best games I've seen Wolves involved in for a long time. The last twenty minutes were edge of your seat stuff. At half time I was hoping Doyle would come on for Milijas, who was having an off game, but he improved, and if one of those through balls had worked out things could have been different. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 07:36 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the >>> manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've > looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On Behalf Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they >> only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as >>> daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing >> ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession >> football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
And if that last second screamer had been 6 inches to the right.. ...it would have hit the post :( -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 9:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED One of the best games I've seen Wolves involved in for a long time. The last twenty minutes were edge of your seat stuff. At half time I was hoping Doyle would come on for Milijas, who was having an off game, but he improved, and if one of those through balls had worked out things could have been different. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 07:36 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the >>> manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've > looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On Behalf Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they >> only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as >>> daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing >> ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession >> football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED They had two or maybe even three players totally unmarked for that second goal. Very poor defending. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 08:11 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Yeah, great end to end match. Has anyone else noticed how many goals we've conceded, or nearly conceded, from Ward not staying with his man ? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:37 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Damn good game of football in the end. I reckon we were very very unlucky not to win. Two really atrocious misses (Hunt and Ward?). Really enjoyed the last 70mins of entertaining football. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the >> manager that made the inspired substitution >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how >>> many halves there are in the second half. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >>> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they > only seem to > be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as >> daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession > football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED One of the best games I've seen Wolves involved in for a long time. The last twenty minutes were edge of your seat stuff. At half time I was hoping Doyle would come on for Milijas, who was having an off game, but he improved, and if one of those through balls had worked out things could have been different. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 07:36 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the >>> manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've > looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On Behalf Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they >> only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as >>> daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing >> ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession >> football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Yee-hah, finally a result. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 9:08 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Finally, you're making some sense. On 21 December 2011 09:07, Rog & Reet wrote: Why would we want Mick out as he's bugger all to do with how well we play? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still want Mick out? On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet wrote: Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Yeah, great end to end match. Has anyone else noticed how many goals we've conceded, or nearly conceded, from Ward not staying with his man ? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:37 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Damn good game of football in the end. I reckon we were very very unlucky not to win. Two really atrocious misses (Hunt and Ward?). Really enjoyed the last 70mins of entertaining football. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >>> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to > be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Finally, you're making some sense. On 21 December 2011 09:07, Rog & Reet wrote: > Why would we want Mick out as he’s bugger all to do with how well we > play? > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > ** ** > > I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still > want Mick out? > > On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet wrote: > > Why the were people booing after that game? > > > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > > Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM > To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > What an incredible last few minutes > > - Original Message - > From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > What a great match. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > > > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > > > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry > wrote: > >> > >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the > manager that made the inspired substitution > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: > >>> > Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many > halves there are in the second half. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > > > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked > the > > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On > Behalf > > Of Chantrys > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > > > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing > game? > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On > > Behalf > >> Of Chantrys > >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > >> > >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only > seem > > to > >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> > >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as > daylight the > >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > > hoof-ball > >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession > football, > > which > >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > >>> > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPad > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is > confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may > be > unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group > will > not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any > views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the > sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the > Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action > taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this > message. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Why would we want Mick out as he's bugger all to do with how well we play? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still want Mick out? On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet wrote: Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Although it looks like Bolton might be hitting form at the wrong time :-( But it only Blackburn :-) _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still want Mick out? On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet wrote: Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still want Mick out? On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet wrote: > Why the were people booing after that game? > > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM > To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > What an incredible last few minutes > > - Original Message - > From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > What a great match. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > > > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > > > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry > wrote: > >> > >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the > manager that made the inspired substitution > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: > >>> > Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many > halves there are in the second half. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > > > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked > the > > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On > Behalf > > Of Chantrys > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > > > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing > game? > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On > > Behalf > >> Of Chantrys > >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > >> > >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only > seem > > to > >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> > >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as > daylight the > >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > > hoof-ball > >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession > football, > > which > >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > >>> > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPad > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is > confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may > be > unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group > will > not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any > views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the > sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the > Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action > taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this > message. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
I think they'd been reading Steve's stuff on Molmix and want MM's wages cut in half? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:45 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
They were the Norwich fans -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:45 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager >>> that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight >>> the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Damn good game of football in the end. I reckon we were very very unlucky not to win. Two really atrocious misses (Hunt and Ward?). Really enjoyed the last 70mins of entertaining football. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >>> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to > be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager >>> that made the inspired substitution >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight >>> the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager >> that made the inspired substitution >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many >>> halves there are in the second half. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >>> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to > be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager > that made the inspired substitution > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: > >> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many >> halves there are in the second half. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >> >>> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the >>> goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf >>> Of Chantrys >>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >>> >>> Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >>> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem >>> to be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective >>> hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, >>> which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > > > Sent from my iPad > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: > Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves > there are in the second half. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the >> goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: >> >>> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >> Behalf >>> Of Chantrys >>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >>> >>> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem >> to >>> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >>> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective >> hoof-ball >>> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, >> which >>> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. Sent from my iPad -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > >> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf >> Of Chantrys >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich >> >> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem > to >> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: >> >>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the >> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > hoof-ball >> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, > which >> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to > be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to > be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > >> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > > > Sent from my iPad > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
That's actually a good idea Rog. Mick can use his halftime talk to give everyone a pay rise and then our season is safe. Genius! Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:18, "Rog & Reet" wrote: > Nothing to do with managers, all we have to do is quadruple our wages at > half time and the game's ours. > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Chantrys > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:10 AM > To: NSWolves > Subject: [NSWolves] Norwich > > Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > > > Sent from my iPad > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Not a great goal - but better than Hunt's miss! -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Nothing to do with managers, all we have to do is quadruple our wages at half time and the game's ours. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:10 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Norwich Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. Sent from my iPad -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich
Nothing to do with managers, all we have to do is quadruple our wages at half time and the game's ours. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:10 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Norwich Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. Sent from my iPad -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball > whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which > is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > > > Sent from my iPad > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
[NSWolves] Norwich
Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. Sent from my iPad -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
[NSWolves] Norwich
Great goal - shame it should have been flagged for offside. There's that 10% again Surman!! :-( _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 6:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages It's like putting pearls before swine. On 20 December 2011 22:22, Rog & Reet wrote: If only bookies gave out prizes for getting 35 out of 40 wrong. I'd be a millionaire, hang on, no I'd be a billionaire. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:57 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages Thanks for these Paul. It's interesting that the correlation is even stronger the year before. When you combine both seasons, the chance of data falling into line like that by chance is about one in 59,000,000,000 (59 billion). On 20 December 2011 16:14, Paul Crowe wrote: Dear Steve, I found these figures on the web from Deloitte's annual football report for season 2009 to 2010, the season before your figures. Results as follows: Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference Burnley. .18..191 Fulham12...11.. ..-1 Stoke11...14.. ..3 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..23... ..1 Wolves..18...15... .3 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...3.5. ...2 Everton..8.8.. ..0 Wigan...16...15... .-1 Hull City..19...16 -3 Bolton...13...14.. ..1 Chelsea..1.1.. .0 Birmingham.17...9 ..8 Man City.5.2.. .-3 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..1710...-7 Compared to your results for last season 2010 to 2011: Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference West Brom..11..198 Fulham8...11.. ..3 Stoke13...15.. ..2 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..13... ..2 Wolves..17...18... .1 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...4.5. ...1 Everton..7.8.. ..1 Wigan...16...16... .0 Newcastle..12...12 0 Bolton...14...14.. ..0 Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 Man City.3.2.. .-1 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..208...-12 Ok, pretty similar results. The 2 x anomaly's for 2009 to 2010 being Birmingham and West Ham. Interesting that West Ham went up 2 x places in terms of the wage table for last season compared to the previous year but ended up finishing bottom and were relegated. Pity Deloitte do not publish their reports. Anybody have the figures for the season 2008 to 2009? Still not convinced Manager's have no effect whatsoever and that 90% of team performance is directly attributed to wage bill spend. Regards Paul. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 2:36 PM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages Here's the wages data that Paul Crowe asked for, It's more or less the same as the data I have already shared. West Ham is an outlier and linear regression is not robust so you get a stronger r-squared when you take it out. God knows what happened to them last season
Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages
It's like putting pearls before swine. On 20 December 2011 22:22, Rog & Reet wrote: > If only bookies gave out prizes for getting 35 out of 40 wrong. > > I’d be a millionaire, hang on, no I’d be a billionaire. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:57 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages > > ** ** > > Thanks for these Paul. It's interesting that the correlation is even > stronger the year before. > > When you combine both seasons, the chance of data falling into line like > that by chance is about one in 59,000,000,000 (59 billion). > > ** > ** > > On 20 December 2011 16:14, Paul Crowe > wrote: > > Dear Steve, > > > > I found these figures on the web from Deloitte’s annual football report > for season 2009 to 2010, the season before your figures. Results as follows: > > > > > Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference > Burnley. .18..191 > Fulham12...11.. ..-1 > Stoke11...14.. ..3 > Spurs..57. ...2 > Man Utd..23... ..1 > Wolves..18...15... .3 > Blackpool...19...20... .1 > Arsenal...3.5. ...2 > Everton..8.8.. ..0 > Wigan...16...15... .-1 > Hull City..19...16 -3 > Bolton...13...14.. ..1 > Chelsea..1.1.. .0 > Birmingham.17...9 ..8 > Man City.5.2.. .-3 > Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 > Sunderland.108 -2 > Aston villa...9.6...-3 > Blackburn...15...12... -3 > West Ham..1710...-7 > > Compared to your results for last season 2010 to 2011: > > > > Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference > West Brom..11..198 > Fulham8...11.. ..3 > Stoke13...15.. ..2 > Spurs..57. ...2 > Man Utd..13... ..2 > Wolves..17...18... .1 > Blackpool...19...20... .1 > Arsenal...4.5. ...1 > Everton..7.8.. ..1 > Wigan...16...16... .0 > Newcastle..12...12 0 > Bolton...14...14.. ..0 > Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 > Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 > Man City.3.2.. .-1 > Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 > Sunderland.108 -2 > Aston villa...9.6...-3 > Blackburn...15...12... -3 > West Ham..208...-12 > > > > Ok, pretty similar results. The 2 x anomaly’s for 2009 to 2010 being > Birmingham and West Ham. Interesting that West Ham went up 2 x places in > terms of the wage table for last season compared to the previous year but > ended up finishing bottom and were relegated. > > Pity Deloitte do not publish their reports. Anybody have the figures for > the season 2008 to 2009? > > Still not convinced Manager’s have no effect whatsoever and that 90% of > team performance is directly attributed to wage bill spend. > > Regards > > Paul. > > > > > > Paul Crowe > > Sales Manager - Asia Pacific > > > > ConTech (Sydney Office) > > > > PO Box 3517 > > Rhodes Waterside > > Rhodes NSW 2138 > > Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 > > Mob: 0406009562 > > Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com > > Website: www.contechengineering.com > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 20 December 2011 2:36 PM > *To:* nswolves > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages > > > > Here's the wages data that Paul Crowe asked for, It's more or less the > same as the data I have already shared. > > > > West Ham is an outlier and linear regression is not robust so you get a > stronge
RE: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages
What are you smoking Rog? They do give out prizes for being only one place out though don't they? You'd have only done your money in 22 out of 40 (but you can get a pay out for missing by two in an each way bet. in which case you'd have won 27 out of 40) I reckon that's about as good as a super punter like yourself ever does.? _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 10:22 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages If only bookies gave out prizes for getting 35 out of 40 wrong. I'd be a millionaire, hang on, no I'd be a billionaire. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:57 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages Thanks for these Paul. It's interesting that the correlation is even stronger the year before. When you combine both seasons, the chance of data falling into line like that by chance is about one in 59,000,000,000 (59 billion). On 20 December 2011 16:14, Paul Crowe wrote: Dear Steve, I found these figures on the web from Deloitte's annual football report for season 2009 to 2010, the season before your figures. Results as follows: Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference Burnley. .18..191 Fulham12...11.. ..-1 Stoke11...14.. ..3 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..23... ..1 Wolves..18...15... .3 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...3.5. ...2 Everton..8.8.. ..0 Wigan...16...15... .-1 Hull City..19...16 -3 Bolton...13...14.. ..1 Chelsea..1.1.. .0 Birmingham.17...9 ..8 Man City.5.2.. .-3 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..1710...-7 Compared to your results for last season 2010 to 2011: Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference West Brom..11..198 Fulham8...11.. ..3 Stoke13...15.. ..2 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..13... ..2 Wolves..17...18... .1 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...4.5. ...1 Everton..7.8.. ..1 Wigan...16...16... .0 Newcastle..12...12 0 Bolton...14...14.. ..0 Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 Man City.3.2.. .-1 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..208...-12 Ok, pretty similar results. The 2 x anomaly's for 2009 to 2010 being Birmingham and West Ham. Interesting that West Ham went up 2 x places in terms of the wage table for last season compared to the previous year but ended up finishing bottom and were relegated. Pity Deloitte do not publish their reports. Anybody have the figures for the season 2008 to 2009? Still not convinced Manager's have no effect whatsoever and that 90% of team performance is directly attributed to wage bill spend. Regards Paul. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 2:36 PM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages Here's the wages data that Paul Crowe asked for, It's more or less the same as the data I have already shared. West Ha
RE: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages
If only bookies gave out prizes for getting 35 out of 40 wrong. I'd be a millionaire, hang on, no I'd be a billionaire. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:57 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages Thanks for these Paul. It's interesting that the correlation is even stronger the year before. When you combine both seasons, the chance of data falling into line like that by chance is about one in 59,000,000,000 (59 billion). On 20 December 2011 16:14, Paul Crowe wrote: Dear Steve, I found these figures on the web from Deloitte's annual football report for season 2009 to 2010, the season before your figures. Results as follows: Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference Burnley. .18..191 Fulham12...11.. ..-1 Stoke11...14.. ..3 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..23... ..1 Wolves..18...15... .3 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...3.5. ...2 Everton..8.8.. ..0 Wigan...16...15... .-1 Hull City..19...16 -3 Bolton...13...14.. ..1 Chelsea..1.1.. .0 Birmingham.17...9 ..8 Man City.5.2.. .-3 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..1710...-7 Compared to your results for last season 2010 to 2011: Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference West Brom..11..198 Fulham8...11.. ..3 Stoke13...15.. ..2 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..13... ..2 Wolves..17...18... .1 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...4.5. ...1 Everton..7.8.. ..1 Wigan...16...16... .0 Newcastle..12...12 0 Bolton...14...14.. ..0 Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 Man City.3.2.. .-1 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..208...-12 Ok, pretty similar results. The 2 x anomaly's for 2009 to 2010 being Birmingham and West Ham. Interesting that West Ham went up 2 x places in terms of the wage table for last season compared to the previous year but ended up finishing bottom and were relegated. Pity Deloitte do not publish their reports. Anybody have the figures for the season 2008 to 2009? Still not convinced Manager's have no effect whatsoever and that 90% of team performance is directly attributed to wage bill spend. Regards Paul. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 2:36 PM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages Here's the wages data that Paul Crowe asked for, It's more or less the same as the data I have already shared. West Ham is an outlier and linear regression is not robust so you get a stronger r-squared when you take it out. God knows what happened to them last season -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages
Thanks for these Paul. It's interesting that the correlation is even stronger the year before. When you combine both seasons, the chance of data falling into line like that by chance is about one in 59,000,000,000 (59 billion). On 20 December 2011 16:14, Paul Crowe wrote: > Dear Steve, > > ** ** > > I found these figures on the web from Deloitte’s annual football report > for season 2009 to 2010, the season before your figures. Results as follows: > > > ** ** > > Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference > Burnley. .18..191 > Fulham12...11.. ..-1 > Stoke11...14.. ..3 > Spurs..57. ...2 > Man Utd..23... ..1 > Wolves..18...15... .3 > Blackpool...19...20... .1 > Arsenal...3.5. ...2 > Everton..8.8.. ..0 > Wigan...16...15... .-1 > Hull City..19...16 -3 > Bolton...13...14.. ..1 > Chelsea..1.1.. .0 > Birmingham.17...9 ..8 > Man City.5.2.. .-3 > Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 > Sunderland.108 -2 > Aston villa...9.6...-3 > Blackburn...15...12... -3 > West Ham..1710...-7 > > Compared to your results for last season 2010 to 2011: > > ** ** > > Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference > West Brom..11..198 > Fulham8...11.. ..3 > Stoke13...15.. ..2 > Spurs..57. ...2 > Man Utd..13... ..2 > Wolves..17...18... .1 > Blackpool...19...20... .1 > Arsenal...4.5. ...1 > Everton..7.8.. ..1 > Wigan...16...16... .0 > Newcastle..12...12 0 > Bolton...14...14.. ..0 > Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 > Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 > Man City.3.2.. .-1 > Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 > Sunderland.108 -2 > Aston villa...9.6...-3 > Blackburn...15...12... -3 > West Ham..208...-12 > > ** ** > > Ok, pretty similar results. The 2 x anomaly’s for 2009 to 2010 being > Birmingham and West Ham. Interesting that West Ham went up 2 x places in > terms of the wage table for last season compared to the previous year but > ended up finishing bottom and were relegated. > > Pity Deloitte do not publish their reports. Anybody have the figures for > the season 2008 to 2009? > > Still not convinced Manager’s have no effect whatsoever and that 90% of > team performance is directly attributed to wage bill spend. > > Regards > > Paul. > > > > ** ** > > Paul Crowe > > Sales Manager - Asia Pacific > > > > ConTech (Sydney Office) > > > > PO Box 3517 > > Rhodes Waterside > > Rhodes NSW 2138 > > Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 > > Mob: 0406009562 > > Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com > > Website: www.contechengineering.com > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 20 December 2011 2:36 PM > *To:* nswolves > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages > > ** ** > > Here's the wages data that Paul Crowe asked for, It's more or less the > same as the data I have already shared. > > > > West Ham is an outlier and linear regression is not robust so you get a > stronger r-squared when you take it out. God knows what happened to them > last season > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Interesting choice of quote. Belloc was an anti-Semetic, anti-Islamic Catholic who asserted that the Theory of Evolution had been completely discredited. Someone else who didn't like facts getting in the way of dogmatic personal belief and superstition. On 20 December 2011 19:51, Marcus Chantry wrote: > In the words of Hilaire Belloc: "It has long been recognised by public men > of all kinds, that statistics come under the head of lying, and that no lie > is so false or inconclusive as that which is based on statistics." > > > > On 20/12/2011, at 10:42 , Steven Millward wrote: > > Nothing. I showed you a table that showed that 18 of 20 teams were within > 3 places of the forecast and 15 were within 2 places. There is an element > of luck and other factors in this as I explained in my earlier response to > Matt. It's not a perfect model but it explains 90% of variability. > > > > On 20 December 2011 10:22, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> ok, let's see how much you trust your statistics. How much are you >> willing to place on a bet that Wolves will finish exactly fourth from >> bottom? >> >> >> On 20/12/2011, at 10:20 , Steven Millward wrote: >> >> See you're trying to discredit me by the absurd. The last bastion of a >> scoundrel. >> >> I say there is a need for a manager to do the things that managers do, >> but that beyond a certain level of competence and experience there is very >> little difference in the influence they have on performance. >> >> We need a manager. >> My analysis says that Mick is a good one. >> We should focus on something that is of more importance than this >> superstitious nonsense. >> >> On 20 December 2011 10:05, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >>> you are correct that insurance is very heavily dependant on statistics >>> for assessing and pricing for risks. However, I am not an actuary and my >>> role for the best part of 17 years has been to challenge actuaries to >>> ensure that my products are affordable and sustainable, in effect >>> disproving many of the stats that they use to paint a certain doom & gloom >>> picture. Actuaries can make stats tell whatever story they want them to, >>> but they are very conservative by nature and only assess the stats that >>> they think help their argument. Sound familiar Steve? >>> >>> Let's think outside the square and devise a system whereby each season >>> ticket holder is given a one month tenure as team selector. This does away >>> with the need to have a manager and coaching staff but leaves one person >>> that can be blamed each month depending on performances (over which they've >>> clearly had no effect one). Save money and remove the unnecessary >>> managerial merry-go-round. >>> >>> >>> On 20/12/2011, at 09:30 , Steven Millward wrote: >>> >>> Interesting point of view from someone that works in insurance, an >>> industry that is entirely based on the statistical pricing of risk. >>> >>> Please take the stats I have presented and make them support your >>> agenda. I can send you the spreadsheet if you want to have a go. >>> >>> I understand it must be confronting to have long held belief destroyed >>> in front of your eyes. I suppose you can always rely on "faith" and ignore >>> the facts >>> >>> On 20 December 2011 08:40, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>> Stats can be made to support any agenda that a person wants to push. Climate Change is the perfect example of how both sides can manipulate statistics to support their own agenda. On 20/12/2011, at 08:36 , Jeremy Tonks wrote: ** You’ve missed the point Lee ;) ** ** How much is he being paid? ** ** I’m not sure 1 game without him this season gives us any statistical validity?! I think I’d like to see which games he missed (as in opponents) as well. ** ** ** ** -- *From:* **nswolves@googlegroups.com** [mailto:** nswolves@googlegroups.com**] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:30 AM *To:* **nswolves@googlegroups.com** *Subject:* [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] ** ** *UNCLASSIFIED* Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the Karl Henry stats on Mol Mix? Are these stats too much of a coincidence *2010-2011 - With Karl Henry* P28 ( + 1 sub ) W7 ( 21 points ) D6 ( 6 points ) L16 Pts: 27 *2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry** *P9 W4 ( 12 points ) D1 ( 1 point ) L4 Pts: 13 points *2011-2012 - With Karl Henry* P 14 W3 ( 9 points ) D2 ( 2 points ) L9 Pts: 11 *2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry* P1 W1 ( 3 points ) Pts: 3 >
Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
In the words of Hilaire Belloc: "It has long been recognised by public men of all kinds, that statistics come under the head of lying, and that no lie is so false or inconclusive as that which is based on statistics." On 20/12/2011, at 10:42 , Steven Millward wrote: > Nothing. I showed you a table that showed that 18 of 20 teams were within 3 > places of the forecast and 15 were within 2 places. There is an element of > luck and other factors in this as I explained in my earlier response to Matt. > It's not a perfect model but it explains 90% of variability. > > > > On 20 December 2011 10:22, Marcus Chantry wrote: > ok, let's see how much you trust your statistics. How much are you willing > to place on a bet that Wolves will finish exactly fourth from bottom? > > > On 20/12/2011, at 10:20 , Steven Millward wrote: > >> See you're trying to discredit me by the absurd. The last bastion of a >> scoundrel. >> >> I say there is a need for a manager to do the things that managers do, but >> that beyond a certain level of competence and experience there is very >> little difference in the influence they have on performance. >> >> We need a manager. >> My analysis says that Mick is a good one. >> We should focus on something that is of more importance than this >> superstitious nonsense. >> >> On 20 December 2011 10:05, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> you are correct that insurance is very heavily dependant on statistics for >> assessing and pricing for risks. However, I am not an actuary and my role >> for the best part of 17 years has been to challenge actuaries to ensure that >> my products are affordable and sustainable, in effect disproving many of the >> stats that they use to paint a certain doom & gloom picture. Actuaries can >> make stats tell whatever story they want them to, but they are very >> conservative by nature and only assess the stats that they think help their >> argument. Sound familiar Steve? >> >> Let's think outside the square and devise a system whereby each season >> ticket holder is given a one month tenure as team selector. This does away >> with the need to have a manager and coaching staff but leaves one person >> that can be blamed each month depending on performances (over which they've >> clearly had no effect one). Save money and remove the unnecessary >> managerial merry-go-round. >> >> >> On 20/12/2011, at 09:30 , Steven Millward wrote: >> >>> Interesting point of view from someone that works in insurance, an industry >>> that is entirely based on the statistical pricing of risk. >>> >>> Please take the stats I have presented and make them support your agenda. >>> I can send you the spreadsheet if you want to have a go. >>> >>> I understand it must be confronting to have long held belief destroyed in >>> front of your eyes. I suppose you can always rely on "faith" and ignore >>> the facts >>> >>> On 20 December 2011 08:40, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>> Stats can be made to support any agenda that a person wants to push. >>> Climate Change is the perfect example of how both sides can manipulate >>> statistics to support their own agenda. >>> >>> >>> On 20/12/2011, at 08:36 , Jeremy Tonks wrote: >>> You’ve missed the point Lee ;) How much is he being paid? I’m not sure 1 game without him this season gives us any statistical validity?! I think I’d like to see which games he missed (as in opponents) as well. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:30 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the Karl Henry stats on Mol Mix? Are these stats too much of a coincidence 2010-2011 - With Karl Henry P28 ( + 1 sub ) W7 ( 21 points ) D6 ( 6 points ) L16 Pts: 27 2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry P9 W4 ( 12 points ) D1 ( 1 point ) L4 Pts: 13 points 2011-2012 - With Karl Henry P 14 W3 ( 9 points ) D2 ( 2 points ) L9 Pts: 11 2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry P1 W1 ( 3 points ) Pts: 3 IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:21 To: nswolves@g
