Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
One thing I'd like us to explicitly consider is to take JWT and the JWT Assertion Profile to working group last call. That would make particular sense if the JOSE WG also takes the JOSE specs to WGLC at the same time, which I'm asking them to consider doing in Atlanta. Best wishes, -- Mike -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 1:04 AM To: oauth@ietf.org WG Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting Hi all, here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: (The indicated names are proposals.) -- Agenda: 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) 5. JWT (Mike) 6. Security (Phil) 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) 8. Roadmap -- In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to this, namely (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how do we improve interoperability. Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. Ciao Hannes & Derek PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
I will be at iiw on tues/wed. Phil On 2012-10-19, at 12:10, "Richer, Justin P." wrote: > On those lines, I've been asked to sign up as co-editor for the dynamic > client registration document, and I'd be OK with that. There are a lot of > little side documents that I'd like to see finalized (XML encoding, instance, > UX, dynamic reg, chained auth, MAC). We can discuss details at either IIW or > IETF -- but it's something that I'd definitely like to help see through how I > can. > > -- Justin > > On Oct 10, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > >> Hi Justin, Hi Torsten, >> >> We will take care of appropriate time management and agenda topics that have >> not seen enough presentation on the list will be postponed. >> >> In fact, I am concerned about the progress with the use cases document and >> the dynamic client registration work. I have notified the authors of my >> concerns privately already. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> On 10/10/2012 08:09 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> "Richer, Justin P." schrieb: >>> >>> Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of >>> time for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling other >>> discussions ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents in >>> various states of use/neglect that shouldn't be left aside by the WG, and >>> this is a good venue for all of that. >>> >>> -- Justin >>> >>> On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Zachary >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On >>> Behalf Of Phil Hunt >>> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 2:54 PM >>> To: Torsten Lodderstedt >>> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG >>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt >>>wrote: >>> >>> fine for me >>> >>> Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: >>> (The indicated names are proposals.) >>> >>> -- >>> Agenda: >>> >>> 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) >>> 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) >>> 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) >>> 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >>> 5. JWT (Mike) >>> 6. Security (Phil) >>> 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) >>> 8. Roadmap >>> -- >>> >>> In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger >>> picture of how to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. >>> There are at least 2 parts to this, namely (a) what >>> other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how >>> do we improve interoperability. >>> >>> Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes & Derek >>> >>> PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >>> >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > ___ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
On those lines, I've been asked to sign up as co-editor for the dynamic client registration document, and I'd be OK with that. There are a lot of little side documents that I'd like to see finalized (XML encoding, instance, UX, dynamic reg, chained auth, MAC). We can discuss details at either IIW or IETF -- but it's something that I'd definitely like to help see through how I can. -- Justin On Oct 10, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Justin, Hi Torsten, > > We will take care of appropriate time management and agenda topics that have > not seen enough presentation on the list will be postponed. > > In fact, I am concerned about the progress with the use cases document and > the dynamic client registration work. I have notified the authors of my > concerns privately already. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On 10/10/2012 08:09 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: >> +1 >> >> >> >> "Richer, Justin P." schrieb: >> >>Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of >> time for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling other >> discussions ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents in various >> states of use/neglect that shouldn't be left aside by the WG, and this is a >> good venue for all of that. >> >>-- Justin >> >>On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) wrote: >> >>+1 >> >>Zachary >> >>-Original Message- >>From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On >>Behalf Of Phil Hunt >>Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 2:54 PM >>To: Torsten Lodderstedt >>Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG >>Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting >> >>+1 >> >>Phil >> >>On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt >> wrote: >> >>fine for me >> >>Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: >> >>Hi all, >> >>here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: >>(The indicated names are proposals.) >> >>-- >>Agenda: >> >>1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) >>2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) >>3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) >>4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >>5. JWT (Mike) >>6. Security (Phil) >>7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) >>8. Roadmap >>-- >> >>In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger >>picture of how to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. >>There are at least 2 parts to this, namely (a) what >>other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how >>do we improve interoperability. >> >>Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. >> >>Ciao >>Hannes & Derek >> >>PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. >> >> >> >> >>OAuth mailing list >>OAuth@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> >> >> >>OAuth mailing list >>OAuth@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> >> >>OAuth mailing list >>OAuth@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> >>OAuth mailing list >>OAuth@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
Hi Justin, Hi Torsten,
We will take care of appropriate time management and agenda topics that
have not seen enough presentation on the list will be postponed.
In fact, I am concerned about the progress with the use cases document
and the dynamic client registration work. I have notified the authors of
my concerns privately already.
Ciao
Hannes
On 10/10/2012 08:09 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
+1
"Richer, Justin P." schrieb:
Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of
time for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling other
discussions ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents in various
states of use/neglect that shouldn't be left aside by the WG, and this is a
good venue for all of that.
-- Justin
On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) wrote:
+1
Zachary
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Hunt
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 2:54 PM
To: Torsten Lodderstedt
Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
+1
Phil
On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt
wrote:
fine for me
Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig:
Hi all,
here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting:
(The indicated names are proposals.)
--
Agenda:
1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs)
2. Token Revocation (Thorsten)
3. Assertions (Brian + Mike)
4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary)
5. JWT (Mike)
6. Security (Phil)
7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas)
8. Roadmap
--
In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger
picture of how to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved.
There are at least 2 parts to this, namely (a) what
other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how
do we improve interoperability.
Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon.
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
+1 "Richer, Justin P." schrieb: >Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of >time for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling >other discussions ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents >in various states of use/neglect that shouldn't be left aside by the >WG, and this is a good venue for all of that. > > -- Justin > >On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Zachary >> >> -Original Message- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On >Behalf Of Phil Hunt >> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 2:54 PM >> To: Torsten Lodderstedt >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting >> >> +1 >> >> Phil >> >> On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt > wrote: >> >>> fine for me >>> >>> Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: >>>> (The indicated names are proposals.) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Agenda: >>>> >>>> 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) >>>> 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) >>>> 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) >>>> 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >>>> 5. JWT (Mike) >>>> 6. Security (Phil) >>>> 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) >>>> 8. Roadmap >>>> -- >>>> >>>> In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how >to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to >this, namely (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and >(b) how do we improve interoperability. >>>> >>>> Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. >>>> >>>> Ciao >>>> Hannes & Derek >>>> >>>> PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> OAuth mailing list >>>> OAuth@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> ___ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> ___ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> ___ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of time for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling other discussions ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents in various states of use/neglect that shouldn't be left aside by the WG, and this is a good venue for all of that. -- Justin On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) wrote: > +1 > > Zachary > > -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Phil Hunt > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 2:54 PM > To: Torsten Lodderstedt > Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting > > +1 > > Phil > > On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > >> fine for me >> >> Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: >>> (The indicated names are proposals.) >>> >>> -- >>> Agenda: >>> >>> 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) >>> 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) >>> 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) >>> 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >>> 5. JWT (Mike) >>> 6. Security (Phil) >>> 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) >>> 8. Roadmap >>> -- >>> >>> In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how to get >>> OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to this, namely >>> (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how do we >>> improve interoperability. >>> >>> Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes & Derek >>> >>> PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. >>> >>> ___ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> ___ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > ___ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > ___ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
+1 Zachary -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Hunt Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 2:54 PM To: Torsten Lodderstedt Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting +1 Phil On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > fine for me > > Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: >> Hi all, >> >> here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: >> (The indicated names are proposals.) >> >> -- >> Agenda: >> >> 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) >> 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) >> 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) >> 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >> 5. JWT (Mike) >> 6. Security (Phil) >> 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) >> 8. Roadmap >> -- >> >> In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how to get >> OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to this, namely >> (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how do we >> improve interoperability. >> >> Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes & Derek >> >> PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. >> >> ___ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > ___ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
+1 Phil On 2012-10-06, at 10:07, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > fine for me > > Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: >> Hi all, >> >> here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: >> (The indicated names are proposals.) >> >> -- >> Agenda: >> >> 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) >> 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) >> 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) >> 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >> 5. JWT (Mike) >> 6. Security (Phil) >> 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) >> 8. Roadmap >> -- >> >> In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how to get >> OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to this, namely >> (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how do we >> improve interoperability. >> >> Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes & Derek >> >> PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. >> >> ___ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > ___ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
fine for me Am 05.10.2012 10:03, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: Hi all, here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: (The indicated names are proposals.) -- Agenda: 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) 5. JWT (Mike) 6. Security (Phil) 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) 8. Roadmap -- In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to this, namely (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how do we improve interoperability. Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. Ciao Hannes & Derek PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
[OAUTH-WG] Agenda for Atlanta Meeting
Hi all, here is an agenda proposal for the Atlanta IETF meeting: (The indicated names are proposals.) -- Agenda: 1. Status Update, Agenda Bashing (Chairs) 2. Token Revocation (Thorsten) 3. Assertions (Brian + Mike) 4. OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) 5. JWT (Mike) 6. Security (Phil) 7. Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas) 8. Roadmap -- In the last item we would like to discuss the bigger picture of how to get OAuth 2.0 deployment improved. There are at least 2 parts to this, namely (a) what other specifications do we need to work on, and (b) how do we improve interoperability. Let us know whether you think that this fits your needs. Ciao Hannes & Derek PS: I am hoping to see daft updates of the WG items soon. ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
