RE: [ozmidwifery] just a thought - stickers for ICM

2005-07-03 Thread Andrea Robertson

Hello Robyn,

We'll have the stickers - you can put them anywhere appropriate/practical. 
Not everyone will have the Akubras...


See you in Brisbane,

Andrea



At 07:02 PM 1/07/2005, you wrote:

An OZMIDWIFERY STICKER attached to the Australian Akubara Hats would stand
out in the crowd.

Robyn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea Robertson
Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 3:51 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] just a thought - stickers for ICM

Hi Andrea Q,

Yes, great idea!  I'll get something organised - perhaps a star that could
go on the name tags (you are all definitely gold star people) or
something similar - come to the stand when you get there and I will make
sure that you get a sticker.

It will be fun to see how many of us are there...!

Cheers

Andrea R



At 01:17 PM 1/07/2005, you wrote:
Andrea R
Any chance of some 'oz midwifery' stickers that list members could collect
from you and put on our name tags at ICM so we can recognise and chat with
each other

Andrea Q

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




-
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



-
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Fw: Inspired

2005-07-03 Thread Jenny Cameron



FYI
Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACMPO Box 1465Howard Springs NT 0835

0419 528 717
- Original Message - 
From: ACMI 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:46 AM
Subject: FW: Inspired


Can I have some feedback on this request 
please
I wouldn’t know where to 
start


Regards 
Beth
Bethany 
Leditschke
Office 
manager
Australian College of 
Midwives
(02) 6230 
7333





Hello,
I am a mother of an 8 year old and 6 year 
old and am 36 years of age.. I have been reading some of your 
articles as I am very very interested in doing the Bachelor of Midwifery 
(applying to ACU). I am a little daunted at 
the thought but also feel strongly about working in this area…. I teach 
Pre-Natal Yoga and love being with the Women (it always feels like such an 
honour) to be with them through the months but I feel I want to do and know more 
hence considering the work of a Midwife. 


I am wondering if anyone has the time to 
let me know what I am in for re hours per week of lectures and study time… I am 
of course going to attend the open day in August, but would love to hear from a 
student how they cope and if you know of any other mothers doing the 
degree.




No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG 
Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.5/32 - Release Date: 
27/06/2005


Re: [ozmidwifery] PCOS info?

2005-07-03 Thread James Stephanie Fairbairn



Therre is strong evidence out there that a diet low 
in carbohydrates is a start you can make yourself - as it seems to relieve 
the other symptoms that accompany PCOS like spots etc.
Steph ex adelaide - now in uk (maybe back to oz 
someday!?)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Tania 
  Smallwood 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 12:30 
PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] PCOS info?
  
  
  Hi 
  all,
  
  Have a friend who has just been 
  diagnosed with PCOS, has no babies yet, but has been trying for some 
  time. Wondering where I can access some good quality info for her, she 
  feels like she wants to be fully informed before starting any treatment. 
  It’s not something I’m at all familiar with, and so thought there would be 
  some wise wo/men out there who might be able to shed some light for her, and 
  me too.
  
  
  Thanks
  
  Tania
  x


Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Inspired

2005-07-03 Thread Joy Cocks



Dear ?
I have forwarded this email on to my daughter who completed a 
BMid at ACU last year and is now working at Box Hill hospital. Good luck 
with your enquiries.
Joy

Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLCBRIGHT Vic 3741 
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jenny 
  Cameron 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 22:29 
PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Inspired
  
  FYI
  Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACMPO Box 1465Howard Springs NT 
0835
  
  0419 528 717
  - Original Message - 
  From: ACMI 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:46 AM
  Subject: FW: Inspired
  
  
  Can I have some feedback on this request 
  please
  I wouldn’t know where to 
  start
  
  
  Regards 
  Beth
  Bethany 
  Leditschke
  Office 
  manager
  Australian College of 
  Midwives
  (02) 6230 
  7333
  
  
  
  
  
  Hello,
  I am a mother of an 8 year old and 6 year 
  old and am 36 years of age.. I have been reading some of your 
  articles as I am very very interested in doing the Bachelor of Midwifery 
  (applying to ACU). I am a little daunted 
  at the thought but also feel strongly about working in this area…. I 
  teach Pre-Natal Yoga and love being with the Women (it always feels like such 
  an honour) to be with them through the months but I feel I want to do and know 
  more hence considering the work of a Midwife. 
  
  
  I am wondering if anyone has the time to 
  let me know what I am in for re hours per week of lectures and study time… I 
  am of course going to attend the open day in August, but would love to hear 
  from a student how they cope and if you know of any other mothers doing the 
  degree.
  
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.5/32 - Release Date: 
  27/06/2005


[no subject]

2005-07-03 Thread leanne wynne

Home superior to hospital birth
Source: British Medical Journal 2005; 330: 1416-22

The largest prospective study of planned home births to date evaluates the 
safety of such births supported by direct entry midwives.



Among low-risk women, home births assisted by certified midwives achieve 
similar rates of intrapartum and neonatal mortality as hospital births, with 
lower rates of medical intervention, reveal Canadian researchers.


Despite a wealth of evidence supporting planned home birth as a safe option 
for women with low risk pregnancies, the setting remains controversial in 
most high resource settings, note Kenneth Johnson (Public Health Agency of 
Canada) and Betty-Anne Daviss (International Federation of Gynecology and 
Obstetrics, Ottawa).


To examine its safety further, the team compared perinatal outcomes for all 
planned home births (n = 5418) supported by the North American Registry of 
Midwives in 2000, with those previously reported for low-risk hospital 
births in the USA.


Overall, 12.1 percent of women were transferred to hospital for delivery. 
The incidence of neonatal mortality among those who remained at home was 
similar to that documented for low-risk hospital births, with no maternal 
deaths. Medical intervention, however, was substantially less common among 
home, versus hospital, births, with epidural, episiotomy, forceps, vacuum 
extraction, and cesarean section rates of 4.7 percent, 2.1 percent, 1.9 
percent, 0.6 percent, and 3.7 percent, respectively.


Our study of certified professional midwives suggests that they achieve 
good outcomes among low-risk women without routine use of expensive hospital 
interventions, conclude Johnson and Daviss.


Posted: 23 June 2005



Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] FYI

2005-07-03 Thread leanne wynne

Hi All,
I thought the comment at the end of this article about caregiver bias very 
relevant.

Leanne.

Short stature independently predicts cesareans
Issue 13: 27 Jun 2005
Source: European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 
2005; 120: 175-8



Maternal short stature is an independent risk factor for cesarean section, 
according to new findings. The researchers report a significantly higher 
rate of cesareans among women less than 155 cm in height compared with 
taller women, even after controlling for labor dystocia.



Specialists from the Soroka University Medical Center in Beer-Sheva, Israel, 
analyzed the records of all 159,210 deliveries that occurred at the center 
between 1988 and 2002.


In 5,822 of these deliveries (3.65 percent), the mother was of short 
stature, defined as being less than 155 cm in height. These women were 
almost twice as likely to have a cesarean section compared with taller women 
(21.3 percent versus 11.9 percent, respectively).


Women of short stature also had significantly higher rates of previous 
delivery by cesarean, intrauterine growth restriction, premature rupture of 
membranes, failed induction, labor dystocia, malpresentations, and 
cephalopelvic disproportion.


However, the researchers found no significant differences in perinatal 
complications such as low birth weight, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, 
perinatal mortality, and low 5-minute Apgar scores.


Significant and independent
Importantly, the association between short stature and cesareans persisted 
even after controlling for other potentially confounding factors, including 
dystocia. Writing in the European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and 
Reproductive Biology, the researchers report that short stature is an 
independent risk factor for cesarean section, with an odds ratio of 1.7.


They say the higher rate of deliveries by cesarean among short women “can be 
partially attributed to caregiver bias. Whenever the attending obstetrician 
realizes that the patient’s stature is short, even mild deviations from the 
‘normal’ labor curves lead to cesarean section.”


They suggest that the findings should prompt obstetricians to “reconsider 
their attitudes towards cesarean deliveries in mothers 155 cm”, and call 
for “an objective evaluation of the benefits and risks” of performing 
cesareans in such women.


The researchers say further prospective studies investigating indications 
for cesareans need to be conducted in order to help inform decisions.




Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] FYI

2005-07-03 Thread leanne wynne

AMA Says Ultrasound In-Utero Portraits Are Bad Idea


Reuters Health Information 2005. © 2005 Reuters Ltd.
Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or 
similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of 
Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the 
content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the 
Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters 
group of companies around the world.




By M. Mary Conroy

CHICAGO (Reuters Health) Jun 21 - Keepsake ultrasound portraits of fetuses 
are not medically appropriate and should be discouraged, the American 
Medical Association's House of Delegates stated at its annual meeting here 
this week.


Recent advances in ultrasound technology, including 3-D image capacity, have 
made the pre-birth portraits popular, which prompted the Missouri 
delegation to the House of Delegates to ask the AMA to go public about the 
risks of the practice.


The Missouri doctors said the ultrasound portraits are often done by 
unqualified technicians in whose hands ultrasound, which is generally a safe 
procedure, may have unanticipated risks.


The new AMA policy directs the organization to adopt current Food and Drug 
Administration policy on the use of non-diagnostic fetal ultrasound. The FDA 
policy states that keepsake fetal videos are an unapproved use of a 
medical device. In approving the policy, the House of Delegates also 
directed AMA leaders to lobby the FDA to enforce its prohibition of 
unapproved, non-medical uses of the technology.


During a reference committee hearing testimony was overwhelmingly in 
support of this resolution calling for the responsible use of diagnostic 
ultrasound during pregnancy, said Dr. Daniel van Heeckeren, who chaired the 
reference committee.


Dr. Van Heeckeren, a thoracic surgeon at University Hospitals, Cleveland, 
Ohio, added that fetal ultrasonography is considered safe when properly 
used. And although there is no evidence to suggest that exposing a fetus to 
unnecessary ultrasound is harmful, strong support was voiced endorsing its 
use only where there is a clear medical benefit to the patients.


He also noted that use of diagnostic ultrasound for keepsake purposes puts 
the clinician at risk of potential legal liability since this imaging is 
often performed without parents receiving the standard counseling that 
normally precedes ultrasound examinations.


Dr. Marilyn Laughead, of Scottsdale, Arizona, and a delegate form the 
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, said, Although there is no 
confirmed biological effect of ultrasound known today, there may be some 
effect identified in the future. For that reason ultrasound should be used 
only for medically indicated purposes.



Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Short women

2005-07-03 Thread cummins
Leanne

In my experience, women of short stature (of which I am one!) very commonly
have babies in the OA position.  I have concluded (my own opinion, without
research or evidence) that this is because there is simply no room for a
baby to be OP.  Us women of short stature, do not labour or birth any
differently to other women, and due to position could even exceed the
expected 'normal labour curves'.

Felicity  (152cm)


- Original Message - 
From: leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] FYI


 Hi All,
 I thought the comment at the end of this article about caregiver bias
very
 relevant.
 Leanne.

 Short stature independently predicts cesareans
 Issue 13: 27 Jun 2005
 Source: European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and Reproductive
Biology
 2005; 120: 175-8


 Maternal short stature is an independent risk factor for cesarean section,
 according to new findings. The researchers report a significantly higher
 rate of cesareans among women less than 155 cm in height compared with
 taller women, even after controlling for labor dystocia.


 Specialists from the Soroka University Medical Center in Beer-Sheva,
Israel,
 analyzed the records of all 159,210 deliveries that occurred at the center
 between 1988 and 2002.

 In 5,822 of these deliveries (3.65 percent), the mother was of short
 stature, defined as being less than 155 cm in height. These women were
 almost twice as likely to have a cesarean section compared with taller
women
 (21.3 percent versus 11.9 percent, respectively).

 Women of short stature also had significantly higher rates of previous
 delivery by cesarean, intrauterine growth restriction, premature rupture
of
 membranes, failed induction, labor dystocia, malpresentations, and
 cephalopelvic disproportion.

 However, the researchers found no significant differences in perinatal
 complications such as low birth weight, meconium-stained amniotic fluid,
 perinatal mortality, and low 5-minute Apgar scores.

 Significant and independent
 Importantly, the association between short stature and cesareans persisted
 even after controlling for other potentially confounding factors,
including
 dystocia. Writing in the European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and
 Reproductive Biology, the researchers report that short stature is an
 independent risk factor for cesarean section, with an odds ratio of 1.7.

 They say the higher rate of deliveries by cesarean among short women can
be
 partially attributed to caregiver bias. Whenever the attending
obstetrician
 realizes that the patient's stature is short, even mild deviations from
the
 'normal' labor curves lead to cesarean section.

 They suggest that the findings should prompt obstetricians to reconsider
 their attitudes towards cesarean deliveries in mothers 155 cm, and call
 for an objective evaluation of the benefits and risks of performing
 cesareans in such women.

 The researchers say further prospective studies investigating indications
 for cesareans need to be conducted in order to help inform decisions.



 Leanne Wynne
 Midwife in charge of Women's Business
 Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Hey midwifery ;)

2005-07-03 Thread Kylie Carberry
Title: Invitation from Kylie 

























ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au,


Come join my network at hi5!

I now have over 9 friends in my network!  You can meet all of them,
plus more than 12 million other Hi5 members!Once you join, you will immediately
be connected to all the people in my circle of friends.
Hi5 is an online service that lets you meet new people, view photos,
browse profiles, and chat with your friends.


I'll see you inside,

Kylie 



already has more than 12 million members!












Gender/Age:
Female/35





Location:
Warilla




















This invitation was sent to ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au on behalf of Kylie  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).


If you do not wish to receive invitations from hi5 members, click on the link below:

http://www.hi5.com/friend/displayBlockInvite.do?inviteId=CZM767LOXK29157410o0






RE: [ozmidwifery] Short women

2005-07-03 Thread leanne wynne

Absolutely Felicity!!
Thats why I drew your attention to the comment by the researchers that 
caregiver bias can result in minor deviations from normal being perceived 
as an indication for intervention and thus increasing the incidence of C/S.

Leanne.


From: cummins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Short women
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:26:08 +1000

Leanne

In my experience, women of short stature (of which I am one!) very commonly
have babies in the OA position.  I have concluded (my own opinion, without
research or evidence) that this is because there is simply no room for a
baby to be OP.  Us women of short stature, do not labour or birth any
differently to other women, and due to position could even exceed the
expected 'normal labour curves'.

Felicity  (152cm)


- Original Message -
From: leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] FYI


 Hi All,
 I thought the comment at the end of this article about caregiver bias
very
 relevant.
 Leanne.

 Short stature independently predicts cesareans
 Issue 13: 27 Jun 2005
 Source: European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and Reproductive
Biology
 2005; 120: 175-8


 Maternal short stature is an independent risk factor for cesarean 
section,

 according to new findings. The researchers report a significantly higher
 rate of cesareans among women less than 155 cm in height compared with
 taller women, even after controlling for labor dystocia.


 Specialists from the Soroka University Medical Center in Beer-Sheva,
Israel,
 analyzed the records of all 159,210 deliveries that occurred at the 
center

 between 1988 and 2002.

 In 5,822 of these deliveries (3.65 percent), the mother was of short
 stature, defined as being less than 155 cm in height. These women were
 almost twice as likely to have a cesarean section compared with taller
women
 (21.3 percent versus 11.9 percent, respectively).

 Women of short stature also had significantly higher rates of previous
 delivery by cesarean, intrauterine growth restriction, premature rupture
of
 membranes, failed induction, labor dystocia, malpresentations, and
 cephalopelvic disproportion.

 However, the researchers found no significant differences in perinatal
 complications such as low birth weight, meconium-stained amniotic fluid,
 perinatal mortality, and low 5-minute Apgar scores.

 Significant and independent
 Importantly, the association between short stature and cesareans 
persisted

 even after controlling for other potentially confounding factors,
including
 dystocia. Writing in the European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and
 Reproductive Biology, the researchers report that short stature is an
 independent risk factor for cesarean section, with an odds ratio of 1.7.

 They say the higher rate of deliveries by cesarean among short women 
can

be
 partially attributed to caregiver bias. Whenever the attending
obstetrician
 realizes that the patient's stature is short, even mild deviations from
the
 'normal' labor curves lead to cesarean section.

 They suggest that the findings should prompt obstetricians to 
reconsider
 their attitudes towards cesarean deliveries in mothers 155 cm, and 
call

 for an objective evaluation of the benefits and risks of performing
 cesareans in such women.

 The researchers say further prospective studies investigating 
indications

 for cesareans need to be conducted in order to help inform decisions.



 Leanne Wynne
 Midwife in charge of Women's Business
 Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] inspiring quotes for pregnant women

2005-07-03 Thread Julie Clarke








Hi fellow ozmidders,

Do you know of any inspirational quotes or uplifting sayings
or motivational pieces that would be helpful to a pregnant woman?

Warm hug to all

Julie



Julie Clarke CBE

Independent
Childbirth and Parenting Educator

HypnoBirthing (R) Practitioner

ACE
Grad Dip Supervisor

NACE
Advanced Educator and Trainer

NACE
National Journal Editor

Transition into Parenthood Sessions

9
  Withybrook Place

Sylvania NSW 2224

Telephone
9544 6441

Mobile: 0401 2655 30

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

visit Julie's website: www.transitionintoparenthood.com.au










RE: [ozmidwifery] inspiring quotes for pregnant women

2005-07-03 Thread Nicola Morley








When I need quotes for anything, a quick
search on google or similar of quotes
pregnancy or poems pregnancy usually does the trick.

HTH

J

Nicola Morley



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Julie Clarke
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 2:55
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] inspiring
quotes for pregnant women



Hi fellow ozmidders,

Do you know of any inspirational
quotes or uplifting sayings or motivational pieces that would be helpful to a
pregnant woman?

Warm hug to all

Julie



Julie Clarke CBE

Independent
Childbirth and Parenting Educator

HypnoBirthing
(R) Practitioner

ACE Grad Dip
Supervisor

NACE Advanced
Educator and Trainer

NACE National
Journal Editor

Transition into Parenthood Sessions

9 Withybrook Place

Sylvania NSW 2224

Telephone
9544 6441

Mobile: 0401 2655 30

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

visit Julie's website: www.transitionintoparenthood.com.au










RE: [ozmidwifery] Short women

2005-07-03 Thread Ken WArd
Three of my babies were op, no.3 was oa. I'm 5ft4, not particularly short,
but square.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of cummins
Sent: Monday, 4 July 2005 1:26 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Short women


Leanne

In my experience, women of short stature (of which I am one!) very commonly
have babies in the OA position.  I have concluded (my own opinion, without
research or evidence) that this is because there is simply no room for a
baby to be OP.  Us women of short stature, do not labour or birth any
differently to other women, and due to position could even exceed the
expected 'normal labour curves'.

Felicity  (152cm)


- Original Message -
From: leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] FYI


 Hi All,
 I thought the comment at the end of this article about caregiver bias
very
 relevant.
 Leanne.

 Short stature independently predicts cesareans
 Issue 13: 27 Jun 2005
 Source: European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and Reproductive
Biology
 2005; 120: 175-8


 Maternal short stature is an independent risk factor for cesarean section,
 according to new findings. The researchers report a significantly higher
 rate of cesareans among women less than 155 cm in height compared with
 taller women, even after controlling for labor dystocia.


 Specialists from the Soroka University Medical Center in Beer-Sheva,
Israel,
 analyzed the records of all 159,210 deliveries that occurred at the center
 between 1988 and 2002.

 In 5,822 of these deliveries (3.65 percent), the mother was of short
 stature, defined as being less than 155 cm in height. These women were
 almost twice as likely to have a cesarean section compared with taller
women
 (21.3 percent versus 11.9 percent, respectively).

 Women of short stature also had significantly higher rates of previous
 delivery by cesarean, intrauterine growth restriction, premature rupture
of
 membranes, failed induction, labor dystocia, malpresentations, and
 cephalopelvic disproportion.

 However, the researchers found no significant differences in perinatal
 complications such as low birth weight, meconium-stained amniotic fluid,
 perinatal mortality, and low 5-minute Apgar scores.

 Significant and independent
 Importantly, the association between short stature and cesareans persisted
 even after controlling for other potentially confounding factors,
including
 dystocia. Writing in the European Journal of Obstetrics  Gynecology and
 Reproductive Biology, the researchers report that short stature is an
 independent risk factor for cesarean section, with an odds ratio of 1.7.

 They say the higher rate of deliveries by cesarean among short women can
be
 partially attributed to caregiver bias. Whenever the attending
obstetrician
 realizes that the patient's stature is short, even mild deviations from
the
 'normal' labor curves lead to cesarean section.

 They suggest that the findings should prompt obstetricians to reconsider
 their attitudes towards cesarean deliveries in mothers 155 cm, and call
 for an objective evaluation of the benefits and risks of performing
 cesareans in such women.

 The researchers say further prospective studies investigating indications
 for cesareans need to be conducted in order to help inform decisions.



 Leanne Wynne
 Midwife in charge of Women's Business
 Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.