[Bug 1287794] Review Request: archaius - Library for configuration management API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- archaius-0.7.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3ae4cc39c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1287794] Review Request: archaius - Library for configuration management API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288100] Review Request: console-image-viewer - Terminal image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- console-image-viewer-1.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-cb16dbf919 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288100] Review Request: console-image-viewer - Terminal image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- console-image-viewer-1.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11f979ec71 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273188] Review Request: u2f-hidraw-policy - Udev rule to allow desktop access to HIDRAW U2F tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Morton ---
Wrapping up my end of things...
Andy confirmed that my gnubby key is an old one which doesn't fully implement
the U2F HID spec. Here's his fix (which worked for me) (thanks)
Like this, but double-check the vendor and product.
# /etc/udev/rules.d/70-gnubby.rules
ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="gnubby_end"
ATTRS{idVendor}=="1050", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0211", ENV{ID_SECURITY_TOKEN}="1"
LABEL="gnubby_end"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1240116] Review Request: python-music21 - A toolkit for computational musicology
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116 --- Comment #22 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- zbyszek's scratch build of python-music21-2.1.2-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12064308 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1240116] Review Request: python-music21 - A toolkit for computational musicology
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
--- Comment #21 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Thanks for taking on the review!
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #20)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> 1. The doc and common subpackage both ship the license text, I will recomend
> to include the license text in the common packages and include a weak
> dependencie in doc:
>
> Suggest: python-music21-common
I don't think this is allowed. The license file MUST be installed with any
subcombination of packages.
> Also use weak dependencies in python2 and 3 subpackage to suggest the doc
> subpackage.
Good idea, done.
> 2. The common subpackage include the python2.7 files than are linked to the
> python3 subpackage. As part of the move of Fedora to python3 by default I
> will recomend to split the common subpackage to ship the python3.5 files.
> Currently the common subpackage will requires python2 as the owner of the
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ directory so python3-music21 will require
> python2 to install python-music21-common.
I moved them.
> There are many warning about symlinks in both packages, also please check
> this issue.
I think that the symlinks are fine. rpmlint does not understand symlinks.
> The best aproach to this common content is to place it in /usr/share but
> this will require some mayor patching to the code and this will require to
> work with upstream.
I could move the files in common to /usr/share and provide symlinks from
both subpackages. I don't know if this would be better.
> 3. Include in python2 and 3 %files
>
> %exclude %{python2_sitelib}/music21/LICENSE
> The license file is in the common subpackage.
Done.
> 3. Consider to include the test directory in both packages into a devel
> subpackage (python2-name-devel and python3-name-devel), most user will not
> run the test locally and this will let then get a smaller package to
> download.
>
> 4. Also both packages have a demos directory than do not look to be necesary
> in run time and can be packaged as subpackages, you can use weak depencies
> to suggest the user to install the demos subpackages.
I don't think splitting it up like this makes sense. It is essentially
a user program (using python as its interface), not a library that is
installed as a dependency for other things. Demos can be used as documentation
and are useful when using the package. They are not too big too.
> 5. Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. Builds fails in
> secondary arches, but looks like there is a issue with the packaging root.
Hm, I'll try to rebuild.
> RPMLint:
> 1: python2-music21.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib Not
> need work, it is a rpmlint issue
I actually submitted a PR for that, but it doesn't seem like it will be
merged:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/pull/58
> 2: python3-music21.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
> /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/music21/corpus/cpebach
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/music21/corpus/cpebach If you change the
> common to python3 files this warning will be fixed but you will need to
> check if the link in python2 works fine.
> 3: python3-music21.noarch: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/music21/alpha/trecento/exceldiff.py 644
> Sedout the shebang of this files
Done.
> 4: python-music21-common.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/music21/corpus/josquin/laPlusDesPlus.abc
> Request upstream to fix it or propose a patch to update it.
https://github.com/cuthbertLab/music21/pull/122
> 5: python-music21-doc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/python-music21/html/_sources/tutorials/advancedGraphing.txt
> See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Remove_DOS_line_endings
Done.
I need to update to 2.2.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176595] Review Request: hypre - High performance matrix preconditioners
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Use %autosetup please with so many patches. A single Requires/Provides per line. %doc is used for some license files. .so files would usually be named like libHYPRE.so.2.10.1 not libHYPRE-2.10.1.so. With the current naming, the number is part of the file name. I don't really know what the effect of this is. It will probably break linking against the library... Do you have any programs using the headers and libraries in -devel? It seem that at least it breaks automatic MPI provides/requires generation: $ rpm -qp -R results/hypre-openmpi-2.10.1-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm openmpi(x86-64) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 as you can see, there are no requirements on libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179484] Review Request: python-cram - Simple testing framework for command line applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
- Dist tag is not present → add %{?dist} to Release.
You should convert to the new python macros %py2_build, %py2_install,
%py3_build, %py3_install, and build python2- and python3- subpackages
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file].
The guidelines say you should provide both cram-2.7 and cram-2, and cram-3.5
and cram-3
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin].
%{py3dir} is also deprecated. Use a subdirectory instead.
python3-cram.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Utilities and processors for
the Python Imaging Libary.
The python 2 version of the script should use /usr/bin/python2 (i.e.
%{__python2}), not /usr/bin/python in the header.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1181317] Review Request: python-itools - The itools library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181317 --- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Hm, I lost track of this ticket. I can review it, but there are some things to fix: Python packaging guidelines have been nicely simplified. You should now use %py2_build and %py2_install macros, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python. Summary is useless, 'cause it just duplicates the name. Please succinctly summarize what the package does. Also the %description is a bit unclear: it has something with various formats, but what does the package actually *do*? Use %version in %prep. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1185665] Review Request: muttprint - pretty printing of mails for mutt (and other mailers)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185665 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268083] Review Request: python-maxminddb - Reader for the MaxMind DB format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268083
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
What is the minddb format? Can you add an explanation to the description?
What does it mean that the C extension is optional? If it is always built in
the Fedora package, for Fedora users it is not "optional", and this part of the
description can be removed.
You can use %{summary} to avoid duplicating the summary.
Egginfo stuff doesn't have to be deleted, unless it contains binary eggs.
"do not buil" → typo.
What does it mean that the library does not build in Fedora? Is it missing some
deps?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1282640] Review Request: lastpass-cli - Command line interface to LastPass.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282640
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
You can probably replace the make line with %make_build.
...and the two make install lines with %make_install install-docs.
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is not needed and is not recommended
[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag].
%defattr is not needed
[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions].
Use %{_mandir} for the path, and do not hardcode the compression:
/usr/share/man/man1/lpass.1.gz → %{_mandir}/man1/lpass.1.*
The changelog has an empty entry at the bottom. Either fill it in or remove.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1282893] Review Request: quantum-espresso - A suite for electronic-structure calculations and materials modeling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282893
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Hm, what does this do?:
%if 0%{?el6}
%global mpich mpich
%global mpich_load %_mpich_load
%global mpich_unload %_mpich_unload
%else
%global mpich mpich
%global mpich_load %_mpich_load
%global mpich_unload %_mpich_unload
%endif
Requires are normally written with one =. I think == might be misinterpreted.
You can replace the calls to `basename ${f}` with ${f%/*}, makes things
slightly shorter and more readable.
Please use pushd/popd instead of cd/cd -. This is recommended because the path
is printed, which makes logs easier to understand.
%defattr(-,root,root,-) is not needed.
Use %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc} and then you don't need conditionals
in %files.
Can you comment on the reason for multiple source tarballs? Are they always
released together?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288453] Review Request: python-CommonMark - Python parser for the CommonMark Markdown spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The point of the -doc subpackage is to avoid duplication to save disk space. It
also saves user confusion, because the don't have to look at python2-*-doc
first, and then at python3-*-doc first, and realize that the documentation is
identical. Files in python2-CommonMark-doc and python2-CommonMark-doc *are*
identical, there should be just one -doc package.
You can avoid defining %sum. Just put the summary in the first Summary, and
then use %summary in subsequent subpackages. The summary for -doc should be
different though.
Please use %{__python3} to refer to /usr/bin/python3 everywhere in the spec
file.
You probably don't need to use sed to fix the shebang line. Just move
%py2_install below %py3_install.
PYTHONPATH=$(pwd):$PYTHONPATH → PYTHONPATH=$(pwd)
PYTHONPATH is normally unset, so you don't need to preserve the previous one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1287193] Review Request: letsencrypt - A free, automated certificate authority
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- - license is OK - license file is present, %license is used - latest version - uses the new python packaging template - requires and provides look ok - no scriptlets - builds, install, runs fine - rpmlint: letsencrypt.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/letsencrypt-renewer.1.gz letsencrypt.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/letsencrypt.1.gz Please remove executable bit. letsencrypt-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man7/letsencrypt.7.gz There's no need for this file to be in doc subpackage too. letsencrypt.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/letsencrypt 0 This dir is %ghosted, seems to be a bug in rpmlint. letsencrypt.src:60: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(jquery) letsencrypt.src:61: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(underscore) letsencrypt.src:62: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(inconsolata-fonts) letsencrypt.src:63: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(lato-fonts) letsencrypt.src:64: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(robotoslab-fonts) You should add versions... Probably matters the most for jquery and underscore, the rest can be ignored. letsencrypt-doc.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/letsencrypt-doc/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.eot /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.eot letsencrypt-doc.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/letsencrypt-doc/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.svg /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.svg letsencrypt-doc.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/letsencrypt-doc/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.ttf /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.ttf letsencrypt-doc.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/letsencrypt-doc/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff Those are actually fine when installed. python2-letsencrypt.noarch: W: no-documentation python2-letsencrypt.noarch: W: pem-certificate /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/letsencrypt/tests/testdata/cert-san.pem python2-letsencrypt.noarch: W: pem-certificate /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/letsencrypt/tests/testdata/cert.pem python2-letsencrypt.noarch: W: pem-certificate /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/letsencrypt/tests/testdata/dsa_cert.pem python2-letsencrypt.noarch: W: pem-certificate /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/letsencrypt/tests/testdata/matching_cert.pem 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 17 warnings. Those are obviously used for testing, so that's all fine. Please fix up the small issues pointed out above when uploading. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190269] Review Request: openstack-barbican - Secrets as a Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||openstack-barbican-1.0.0-1. ||el7 --- Comment #31 from Alan Pevec --- Changes to replace uwsgi with gunicorn: https://github.com/openstack-packages/barbican/commit/343314d29da79cc67d81a3221cc4c8596607962f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- CubeReader is a GUI application so you need to require java, not java headless. Also, you need to install a wrapper script to run the application, see https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_generating_application_shell_scripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
Fedora review wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm 2015-12-04
$ rpmlint wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm \
wayland-protocols-devel
wayland-protocols.src: E: summary-too-long C Wayland protocols that adds
functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
+ OK
! needs attention
! rpmlint warnings:
Would be good to fix up the summary-tool-long warning. I'd suggest "Wayland
protocol files" as the new summary.
+ The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The license text (COPYING) is included in %license
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm
1ee04fc828cffaf278fdc684a13981eb wayland-protocols-1.0.tar.xz
1ee04fc828cffaf278fdc684a13981eb Download/wayland-protocols-1.0.tar.xz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
We don't usually specify 'make' explicitly, but it's fine to have it too if
you want to list that.
n/a locale handling
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all the directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Development files should be in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Proper .desktop file handling
+ Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
Some other nitpicks I noticed:
> Requires: pkgconfig
rpmbuild autogenerates a dep on /usr/bin/pkg-config and there's no need to
manually list "Requires: pkgconfig"
> %make_build
Like Jonas says above, this isn't really needed for this package as it's not
building anything.
Another thing I noticed is that now that you are only building a
wayland-protocols-devel and there's no wayland-protocols package, all the
nicely written summaries are essentially not used in the actual user visible
package -- the -devel subpackage only has a copy-pasted one line blurb. It's
also somewhat misleading to say "Development files for %{name}" because there's
no '%{name}' package.
None of these are blocking issues for the review, but please feel free to
address them before importing.
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||or...@cora.nwra.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|or...@cora.nwra.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281532] Review Request: Pagila - Example database for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532 Pavel Raiskup changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr Flags||needinfo?(pingou@pingoured. ||fr) --- Comment #26 from Pavel Raiskup --- Huh :), I'm just curious why scratch build of 'example.spec' resulted into update of this bug. Except for my nick I doubt those spec files have anything in common. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273877] Review Request: nodejs-path-is-absolute - Node.js 0.12 path.isAbsolute() ponyfill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273877 --- Comment #4 from Jared Smith --- Sorry for the delay -- I've been traveling this week and haven't been as attentive to packages as I usually am. I've pushed this to the master branch and am building for rawhide now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769958] Review Request: eqp - Automated theorem prover for first-order equational logic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769958 John C Peterson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(j...@eskimo.com) | --- Comment #10 from John C Peterson --- Hello James, The short answer is no. As I noted in my post dated 2012-11-01, I did get into contact with the organization at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), where the (now deceased) EQP author was employed when the original work was performed. There wasn't any formal procedure at ANL for the licensing or distribution of software when the code was first released. Consequently, the EQP software is not even in their own database of ANL developed software. They pretty much just gave me pointers to the "license" that is shown on the project home page (links below). I can forward those emails from ANL to anyone who is interested. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/AR/eqp/ http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ If that "license" is not adequate, then the matter should be considered closed. My feeling is that it's highly unlikely ANL will be inclined to provide any further clarification above and beyond that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- kalev's scratch build of wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12058568 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||klem...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|klem...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember --- Taking for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281532] Review Request: Pagila - Example database for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532 --- Comment #25 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- praiskup's scratch build of example-0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12058344 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1284945] Review Request: nodejs-jison-lex - Lexical analyzer generator used by jison
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945 --- Comment #2 from Jared Smith --- Not sure why it's failing for you in mock -- I've run it multiple times in mock myself (against rawhide), and it's running perfectly fine. Mind trying again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1287846] Review Request: python-lib389 - python module to access the 389 Directory Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #22 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to mreynolds from comment #21) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #20) > > > > See line #481. > > Ah, I had python-krbV listed in my setup.py file. Do I need to also remove > pytest? > None package should be downloaded during package building (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Reviewer_checklist). Even because download wouldn't permitted in koji. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288610] Review Request: python-lazy-object-proxy - A fast and thorough lazy object proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-lazy-object-proxy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285471] Review Request: nodejs-spdx-exceptions - A list of SPDX standard license exceptions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285471 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-spdx-exceptions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1286006] Review Request: logisim - Educational tool for simulating digital logic circuits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286006 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288651] Review Request: OpenIGTLink
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288651 Dmitry Mikhirev changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Mikhirev --- I'm sorry, forgot to paste URLs: Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/OpenIGTLink.git/plain/OpenIGTLink.spec?id=dcd4b2f058890e46f74a31d47661e4ddeecb97b3 SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00143768-OpenIGTLink/OpenIGTLink-0-0.1.20151015gitccb2438.fc24.src.rpm Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288651] New: Review Request: OpenIGTLink
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288651 Bug ID: 1288651 Summary: Review Request: OpenIGTLink Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mikhi...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: The OpenIGTLink Library is a reference implementation of OpenIGTLink protocol. It is required to build 3D-Slicer that I'm going to package. OpenIGTLink is a network communication protocol specifically designed and developed for research on image-guided and computer-assisted interventions. It provides a standardized mechanism for communications among computers and devices in operating rooms (OR) for a wide variety of image-guided therapy (IGT) applications. Examples of such applications include: - Stereotactic surgical guidance using optical position sensor and medical image visualization software - Intraoperative image guidance using real-time MRI and medical image visualization software - Robot-assisted interventions using robotic devices and surgical planning software OpenIGTLink is a set of messaging formats and rules (protocol) used for data exchange on a local area network (LAN). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288649] Review Request: cmark - cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288649 John Dulaney changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: -|implementation of ||CommonMark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1282063 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063 [Bug 1282063] Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288649] New: Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288649 Bug ID: 1288649 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jdula...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/cmark.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/cmark-0.22.0-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark, a rationalized version of Markdown syntax with a spec. (For the JavaScript reference implementation, see commonmark.js.) It provides a shared library (libcmark) with functions for parsing CommonMark documents to an abstract syntax tree (AST), manipulating the AST, and rendering the document to HTML, groff man, LaTeX, CommonMark, or an XML representation of the AST. It also provides a command-line program (cmark) for parsing and rendering CommonMark documents. Fedora Account System Username: jdulaney -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1282063] Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1270317 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317 [Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1286002] Package Review: jfontchooser - Swing-based java component for font selection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286002 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269813] Review Request: golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go - Golang implementation of JSON Web Tokens (JWT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269813 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go-2.2.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157179] Review Request: log4j-jsonevent-layout - Layout for log4j that generates logstash json_event formatted data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157179 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190735] Review Request: mycila-pom - Mycila parent POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190735 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1284155] Review Request: python-rpdb - A wrapper around pdb allowing remote debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-rpdb-0.1.5-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1110070] Review Request: vert.x - A lightweight, high-performance, polyglot, event-driven application platform for JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110070 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1283190] Review Request: nodejs-is-my-json-valid - A JSONSchema validator that uses code generation to be extremely fast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-is-my-json-valid-2.12.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- python-alembic-0.8.3-3.fc22, python-editor-0.4-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131019] Review Request: lejos-nxj - Run Java on the Lego NXT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131019 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1286001] Review Request: java-colors - Color picker for Java applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286001 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288610] Review Request: python-lazy-object-proxy - A fast and thorough lazy object proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610 --- Comment #5 from Brian Lane --- Spec URL: https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-lazy-object-proxy/python-lazy-object-proxy.spec SRPM URL: https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-lazy-object-proxy/python-lazy-object-proxy-1.2.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: A fast and thorough lazy object proxy Fedora Account System Username: bcl Updated with %attr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288645] New: Review Request: teem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288645 Bug ID: 1288645 Summary: Review Request: teem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mikhi...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/teem.git/plain/teem.spec?id=c4062dcf9a54cb7f3d50e3a5c5aaf047dc2557fe SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00143767-teem/teem-1.11.0-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Teem is a coordinated group of libraries for representing, processing, and visualizing scientific raster data. Teem includes command-line tools that permit the library functions to be quickly applied to files and streams, without having to write any code. The most important and useful libraries in Teem are: - Nrrd (and the unu command-line tool on top of it) supports a range of operations for transforming N-dimensional raster data (resample, crop, slice, project, histogram, etc.), as well as the NRRD file format for storing arrays and their meta-information. - Gage: fast convolution-based measurements at arbitrary point locations in volume datasets (scalar, vector, tensor, etc.) - Mite: a multi-threaded ray-casting volume render with transfer functions based on any quantity Gage can measure - Ten: for estimating, processing, and visualizing diffusion tensor fields, including fiber tractography methods. This library is required to build 3D-Slicer that I'm going to package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288645] Review Request: teem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288645 Dmitry Mikhirev changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1282063] Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
HI
could you build libxxhash? is a BuildRequires for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
can you add this part in your spec file?
# Use ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR} instead of hardcoded lib in cmake file
sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}|'
cmake_unofficial/CMakeLists.txt
%build
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}"
#CPPFLAGS="CPPFLAGS"
export CFLAGS
(
cd cmake_unofficial
%{__cmake} -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=%{_prefix}
-DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=%{_libdir}
)
%install
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -C cmake_unofficial
find %{buildroot} -name '*.a' -delete
find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -delete
Thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288643] Review Request: dlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643 Dmitry Mikhirev changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288643] New: Review Request: dlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643 Bug ID: 1288643 Summary: Review Request: dlib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mikhi...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/dlib.git/plain/dlib.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00144844-dlib/dlib-18.18-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Dlib is a modern C++ toolkit containing machine learning algorithms and tools for creating complex software in C++ to solve real world problems. It is open source software and licensed under the Boost Software License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281532] Review Request: Pagila - Example database for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532 --- Comment #24 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- praiskup's scratch build of example-0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12057711 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- I've added /usr/x86_64-nacl ownership. I think chromium broke on the softlinks. Would rather just keep it as is, where I know it works. This toolchain (nacl-binutils, nacl-gcc, nacl-newlib) is only ever used to make x86_64 and i686 builds. I'm not entirely sure if it will work on i686 systems, but it definitely isn't useful anywhere else. We disable nacl/pnacl on i686 right now. For these packages, ExclusiveArch is correct, because we never care/need for it to build anywhere else, and pnacl/chromium wouldn't use it even if we did. The other nacl toolchain (nacl-arm-$foo) is only ever used to do arm builds, but because of how pnacl works, it needs this to be built for x86_64 (and i686 and arm in theory). Since we're disabling i686 nacl/pnacl right now and I haven't got enough good liquor to work on chromium ARM yet, ExclusiveArch is correct there too. I think I can figure out how to build the nacl/pnacl stack for arm without nacl, but thats a big TODO (Tomas Popela added some fixes to pull in the ffmpeg arm bits, so thats a big part out of the way). Chromium upstream doesn't support ppc/s390 as far as I can see, so there's no sense in going through the normal process for that. I've updated the comment in nacl-binutils to provide a more accurate summary of the situation. New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/nacl-binutils-2.24-4.git1d8592c.fc23.src.rpm New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/nacl-binutils.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-dbf-0.96.005-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ba1f02a453 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277505] Review Request: jssc - Java Simple Serial Connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505 --- Comment #16 from gil cattaneo --- Damian javapackages-tools-doc package provides https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162011] Review Request: qname - This is the javax.transaction's spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 and (how wrote Quan Xu) BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk no more exist in Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804125] Review Request: rdkit - A toolkit for cheminformatics and machine learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125 --- Comment #40 from Gianluca Sforna --- Updated package and spec, the tests are now fixed: https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.09.2-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-dbf-0.96.005-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4a867ad4e4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162000] Review Request:jonathan-core - Distributed Object Platform (DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277505] Review Request: jssc - Java Simple Serial Connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505 --- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo --- Other trick Remove BuildRequires:jpackage-utils BuildRequires:maven-local Requires:java-headless Requires:jpackage-utils and add BuildRequires:javapackages-local because jpackage-utils is an alias of javapackages-tools . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865 --- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of glite-px-proxyrenewal?#4338269af302c9682fd1b8dd2852e8f05589b8e7 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-px-proxyrenewal?#4338269af302c9682fd1b8dd2852e8f05589b8e7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056238 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of glite-lb-utils?#a5f7629036a2c87266412d58a2365dd4d9236f30 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-utils?#a5f7629036a2c87266412d58a2365dd4d9236f30 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056233 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277505] Review Request: jssc - Java Simple Serial Connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505 --- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Damian Wrobel from comment #13) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10) > > instead of maven-local you should use javapackages-local > > > Gil, thanks for your hints, I started to look at them and compare with > packaging guidelines [1] and I found that e.g. [1] clearly states the > following: > > "Java packages MUST BuildRequire their respective build system: > > BuildRequires: maven-local for packages built with Maven" > > and there is no single reference that javapackages-local can be used as a > substitute for maven-local in this case. Only if the package provide a pom.xml file and use that for build the package in this case you use only java-devel. javapackages-local is enough > So is there any specification on top of it which overwrites this or I > misunderstood or missed something? > > [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires see also https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_generic_java_builds regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of glite-lb-logger?#5d888cd26b591dd49ddcd86339543ad5a7682c98 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-logger?#5d888cd26b591dd49ddcd86339543ad5a7682c98 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056221 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of glite-lb-server?#0b7eec393509758e03e4d2d437cb7f2a5f6136e6 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-server?#0b7eec393509758e03e4d2d437cb7f2a5f6136e6 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056226 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of glite-lb-client?#ab3f7850e46d640d3844321d6a0bdde00e9d34f0 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-client?#ab3f7850e46d640d3844321d6a0bdde00e9d34f0 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056199 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of glite-lb-common?#15e85324e0a340ac46100a3ae2af1c3572693837 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-common?#15e85324e0a340ac46100a3ae2af1c3572693837 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056204 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159703] Review Request: Java persistence API implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Package already available: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/geronimo-jpa.git/ Please, close this bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159691] Review Request: Database statement interceptor for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277505] Review Request: jssc - Java Simple Serial Connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505 --- Comment #13 from Damian Wrobel --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10) > instead of maven-local you should use javapackages-local > Gil, thanks for your hints, I started to look at them and compare with packaging guidelines [1] and I found that e.g. [1] clearly states the following: "Java packages MUST BuildRequire their respective build system: BuildRequires: maven-local for packages built with Maven" and there is no single reference that javapackages-local can be used as a substitute for maven-local in this case. So is there any specification on top of it which overwrites this or I misunderstood or missed something? [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159688] Review Request: monolog - API for monitoring and logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159688 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159687] Review Request: This is the javax.transaction's spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159687 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 and BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk no more exist in Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159223] Review Request: ow2-jta-1.1-spec - "ow2-jta-1.1-spec" spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 and BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk no more exist in Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159220] Review Request: A Java Open Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- The spec file should be cleanup. Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159217] Review Request: J2EE(tm) Connector Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Please, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_dependencies https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157302] Review Request: oldkilim - A generic configuration framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
The spec file should be cleanup, please remove:
Group:Development/Libraries/Java
#Vendor:JPackage Project
#Distribution:JPackage
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot
Group: Development/Documentation
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install section
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%post javadoc
%postun javadoc
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
* jar and javadoc must be without version, e.g.
# jars
install -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}
install -pm 644 distrib/kilim.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}.jar
install -pm 644 distrib/kilim-tools.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-tools.jar
# javadoc
install -p -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
cp -pr doc/apis/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
%files javadoc
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-dbf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231 --- Comment #3 from John Dulaney --- Okay, I'll rerun tomorrow, unless you have a pressing need for it to be done today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159226] Review Request: JavaBeans Activation Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159226 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- The JAF apis are part of JRE (since JAVA >= 1.6). Please, close this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231 --- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes --- The nodejs-ap package was only reviewed this morning, so it's it rawhide but won't have reach most of the mirrors yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786 Julien Enselme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme --- Thanks for the review. I'll correct the line ending of the README and contact upstream for the license before importing the package into pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231 John Dulaney changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NEEDSWORK --- Comment #1 from John Dulaney --- mock failed with: DEBUG util.py:399: No matching package to install: 'npm(ap)' DEBUG util.py:399: Not all dependencies satisfied DEBUG util.py:399: Error: Some packages could not be found. DEBUG util.py:521: Child return code was: 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288453] Review Request: python-CommonMark - Python parser for the CommonMark Markdown spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453 --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme --- SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-CommonMark.spec SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-CommonMark-0.5.4-2.fc23.src.rpm * Fri Dec 4 2015 Julien Enselme - 0.5.4-2 - Correct shebang of cmark.py (/usr/bin/python2 -> /usr/bin/python3) - Add doc packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231 John Dulaney changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jdula...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288610] Review Request: python-lazy-object-proxy - A fast and thorough lazy object proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610 --- Comment #4 from David Shea --- For the ones I left blank because I did a half-assed job of copying and pasting the second time after bugzilla ate my first comment: - no, there's no kernel modules - or static executables - unversioned .so files in non-standard locations is how Python binary modules work - and the package follows all of the directives within the 26 pages of the Fedora Packaging Guidelines plus the 7 pages of the Python appendix plus all of the other linked pages, probably. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159226] Review Request: JavaBeans Activation Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159226 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162011] Review Request: qname - This is the javax.transaction's spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159703] Review Request: Java persistence API implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157302] Review Request: oldkilim - A generic configuration framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159691] Review Request: Database statement interceptor for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162000] Review Request:jonathan-core - Distributed Object Platform (DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159223] Review Request: ow2-jta-1.1-spec - "ow2-jta-1.1-spec" spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159220] Review Request: A Java Open Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159217] Review Request: J2EE(tm) Connector Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
