Re: Hourly Network Checks Revisited...

[Dean Brissinger]

At 10:12 PM +1100 09/25/00, John F. Lambert wrote:

>>Ken Gillett wrote:
>>>
>>>  But I still maintain that NO software should cause unrequested
>>>  dialups, I'm sorry if you don't agree. I don't accept that it is
>>>  beyond the realms of possibility to only perform such checks if it
>>>  doesn't cause a dialup.
>>
>>Peter S., the IPNR author, gets this type of bashing on his list all the
>>time. His answer, and I assume it's true, is that a program can't tell
>>if it's on a dial up connection. The OT code hides this from you. This
>>causes a lot of support headaches for him as many of the problems are in
>>the dialing, and he has no control over when and how that's happening.
>
>Dantz needs the same check box on it's client software

I'm under the impression that the client software does not 
attempt to communicate with the network unless polled by the server. 
All connections are initiated with a broadcast from a Retrospect 
Backup Server (or script).

I have 2 G3 notebooks.  Both have Retrospect installed and 
have identical OSs (9.0.4).  One of them has this problem while the 
other does not.  The problem appeared when the laptop's user took it 
to a foreign network and they changed something in the configuration. 
I've been attempting to locate what changed.  I suspect the laptop is 
attempting to use NTP from the date and time control panel (however, 
this does not cause the dial-up effect on dial-up only machines).

I have noticed that the date and time CP on a dial-up only 
computer will attempt to connect to an NTP server the very moment you 
dial.  If the connection fails (poor line quality or busy signals...) 
the system reports a time-server error.  I suspect that while on a 
network and using the Location Manager to switch from Network to 
Dial-Up (without rebooting) the date and time control panel continues 
to check the time server.  I haven't verified this behavior, it's 
just suspicious.  I recall this being talked about on this thread 
earlier, but never read about any resolution.


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.

Re: Backing up Citrix MetaFrame server

[Dean Brissinger]

>on 9/18/2000 1:08 PM, Daniel Knight at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>  We're looking into a Citrix MetaFrame Windows application server for our
>>  network. I'd prefer to avoid the DAT backups the bidders are recommending
>>  and use Retrospect. Anyone familiar with the MetaFrame application server
>>  and how well it would fit?
>
>I'm using Retrospect on a Mac to backup a MetaFrame server to VXA tape.
>Works great. Just be sure to run the registry backup service on the NT box.

It also works fine without regcopy.exe when backing up from 
Retrospect for Windows.


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Storage space smarts

[Dean Brissinger]

On a side note, does Retrospect check for identical files 
between backup clients?  I have 30 macs with identical system 
folders.  I really only need to backup those system files once.  If 
retrospect was so smart, I could do full backups site wide and get 
most efficient coverage with minimal tape space.  I note it tends to 
backup more than it needs to because of volume name, time stamp, etc.


At 3:49 AM -0700 06/29/00, Ming-Li wrote:
>Hi Matthew,
>
>>  Retrospect uses several matching criteria to compare files
>>  that have already been backed up to what is about to be backed
>>  up. If one of the following has been changed at all,
>>  Retrospect will back up the file again:
>>
>>  MAC files:
>>  name, size, type, creator, creation date and time,
>>  modify date and time, and label.
>>
>>  PC files:
>>  name, size, modify date and time, file system.
>
>Have you ever consider using something even more accurate as the
>criterion--say, CRC32, or some sort of file signature? Will it
>slow down Retrospect significantly than the current approach?
>
>I'm asking because I've found many different applications put
>same version of system files (dll and such) with different
>date/time. The file name, size and version no. (by checking the
>file's properties) stay the same, and a binary comparison would
>show the two files are identical. They have touched the
>date/time probably because they want all their files to have the
>same date/time, or because the original software development
>package (MS C++, Delphi, etc.) did so. And some other software
>would make the date/time of its installation the date/time of
>all the files it put in, regardless their original date/time.
>
>Under current design, Retrospect would back those files up
>again.  By way of CRC32 check, Retrospect would find those files
>are indeed identical to the original ones and skip them.  It
>would not only save storage space, but also give me extra
>confidence for whenever I catch some new application overwriting
>my system files, I can look in Retrospect's backup preview
>window and find which of them are in fact identical (hence no
>worry) and which are different (so I might have to restore my
>backed up version to see which one is in fact newer).
>
>I don't know if any application would change a file's content
>without changing its date/time and size.  But if that happens, a
>CRC32 check would expose them, too.
>
>--
>Best regards,
>Ming-Li
>
>
>
>
>--
>--
>To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
>Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ReportsWatcher [2]

[Dean Brissinger]

Well, IE 5 didn't help.  However, I found the very dangerous and 
virus prone Windows Scripting Host is what it wants.  ;-)  I was 
hoping this thing would export error messages about which files 
couldn't be backed up.  Anyone know if this is even possible?  I 
don't know VB well enough to decipher the code.

In my e-mailed reports I get:

5:41pm: Volume [My Computer/Drive C (C:)] completed, copying 95 files 
for 16551K with 2 errors in 150 seconds.


I'd like to know what those 2 errors are...  I was hoping that 
ReportsWatcher would allow me to check w/o getting in to retrospect 
(given that the backup server hides in a COLD computer room).


At 11:19 AM +1000 06/21/00, Malcolm McLeary wrote:

>on 21/6/00 9:43 AM, Dean Brissinger at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>  Does anyone have Reports Watcher running on an NT4 system?
>
>Yep.
>
>>  I set it up according to the docs that come with it, but I get the
>>  following error:
>>
>>  Run-time error '429'.
>>  ActiveX component can't create object
>>
>>  Any ideas what this means and how I can fix it?
>
>Been there, had that ... I fixed my problem by installing the latest version
>of IE.
>
>Cheers,  Malcolm
>
>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>Information Alchemy Pty Ltd
>  ACN 089 239 305
>Canberra, Australia
>
>Malcolm McLearyMobile: 0412 636 086
>Managing Director  Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  This message was sent using Outlook Express 5.0 for Macintosh.



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: arrgh 519 error

[Dean Brissinger]

Interestingly enough, I have many computers that back up fine 
when I use an Adaptec AHA-2906 (5MB/sec controller) SCSI controller 
in the server.  I upgraded the controller to a 2940UW (40MB/sec 
controller) and now I get -519 errors on 1/3 of both mac and PC 
clients.  I'm guessing that Retrospect is going too fast for the 
clients and thus resulting in -519's.  Has anyone else seen similar 
behavior?

I'm using an AIT-1 tape drive.  It doesn't matter which kind 
of tape drive I use.  I've also played with Exabyte Ellot 820's (high 
speed 8mm) and get the same result.


>Or a SCSI terminator or ID number:)
>
>Derek.
>
>>  >it doesn't appear to be a network problem at all.
>>>when i created a backupset on the hard drive i could backup a fast G4
>>>no problemo
>>>its only when i backup to a tape backupset...
>>
>>Lindsay,
>>
>>Since you mentioned that the tape drive is new and that backing up to a
>>file on the G4 is working ok, I'm thinking that something is amiss in the
>>SCSI voodoo department. Just 'cuz it's new, doesn't mean it works. ;-\
>>Have you tried a new or different cable?  Hooking the tape drive up to a
>>different Mac? A different tape drive? Any and all of these things can
>>lead you to an answer: cable, tape drive, scsi card, logic board even.
>>
>>Just a thought,
>>
>>Pam
>
>
>--
>--
>To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
>Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ReportsWatcher

[Dean Brissinger]

Hiya!

Does anyone have Reports Watcher running on an NT4 system?  I 
set it up according to the docs that come with it, but I get the 
following error:

Run-time error '429'.
ActiveX component can't create object

Any ideas what this means and how I can fix it?


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AIT Autoloader on NT

[Dean Brissinger]

The SCSI drivers are also responsible for my boot disk.  So no.  I 
can't unload them.  I did upgrade to the latest Adaptec 2940UW 
drivers though.


>have you tried unloading, rebooting and reloading the drivers?
>- Original Message -----
>From: "Dean Brissinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 10:57 AM
>Subject: AIT Autoloader on NT
>
>
>>  Heya,
>>
>>  I've got a Sony AIT autoloader (TSL-SA300C) which works great
>>  on the Mac.  I have an identical drive that I'm trying to get to work
>>  on Windows NT with Retrospect.  Problem is, on WinNT (4.0 SP6a) the
>>  drive isn't seen by Windows.
>>
>>  The confusing part is that everything was working fine until
>>  I had a power outage last week.  Now WinNT boots up and tells me the
>>  "DoctrSys" service failed to load and my AIT drive doesn't show up to
>>  the operating system.  The device is working fine and I can send SCSI
>>  commands to it if I boot to DOS.  Anyone have experience with devices
>>  disappearing after power outages?
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  . . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
>>  .   .
>>  .Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
>>  .   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
>>  .   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
>>  .   .
>>  . . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
>>0 0
>>   '
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  --
>>  To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
>>  Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>
>--
>------
>To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
>Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AIT Autoloader on NT

[Dean Brissinger]

Heya,

I've got a Sony AIT autoloader (TSL-SA300C) which works great 
on the Mac.  I have an identical drive that I'm trying to get to work 
on Windows NT with Retrospect.  Problem is, on WinNT (4.0 SP6a) the 
drive isn't seen by Windows.

The confusing part is that everything was working fine until 
I had a power outage last week.  Now WinNT boots up and tells me the 
"DoctrSys" service failed to load and my AIT drive doesn't show up to 
the operating system.  The device is working fine and I can send SCSI 
commands to it if I boot to DOS.  Anyone have experience with devices 
disappearing after power outages?


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

E-Mail Windows Reports

[Dean Brissinger]

Hiya!

Is there a way to get a batch file (running Retrospect on NT) 
to tell me the machine name [and Retrospect container name] of what's 
being backed up?  The example scripts do not tell me the machine 
name.  Compare this excerpt from my Mac (applescript) report:

Macs:
---
#   Fatal errors during backup:
##
Volume "Network Clients:Laptops:hawkeye" completed with error -1028:
client is not visible on network.


#   Completed Backups:
##
Volume "Local Desktop:Binks" completed successfully, copying 70 files for
25506 K with 0 errors in 1 minute 33 seconds.

Volume "Network Clients:Win32 Full Backups:ARES:DRIVE C (C:)" completed
successfully, copying 134 files for 9446 K with 4 errors in 25 seconds.



NT using sample .bat file:
---
Report generated by Retrospect.

Script "Twilight Backups" started on "5/13/2000 22:00".

Script "Twilight Backups" finished a "Normal" backup to "Twilight 
Backup Sets/Twilight Backup Set 1" with 1 error.
"2" files ("15" KB) were backed up in "405" seconds.
The script started on "5/13/2000 22:00", the backup started on 
"5/13/2000 22:00" and finished on "5/13/2000 22:07".

Script "Twilight Backups" finished a "Normal" backup to "Twilight 
Backup Sets/Twilight Backup Set 1".
"2" files ("15" KB) were backed up in "526" seconds.
The script started on "5/13/2000 22:00", the backup started on 
"5/13/2000 22:07" and finished on "5/13/2000 22:17".
----
Script "Twilight Backups" finished with 1 error.



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Retrospect for Mac OS X Server / Mac OS X

[Dean Brissinger]

> > Dear Dantz;
> >
> > Are you working on Retrospect (application and client) for OS X Server and
> > OS X?
> >
> > Please say you are. Monigroup backup is a bit clunky for this Netboot
> > environment...
>
>Check our web site for recent press releases.
>
>I'm happy to say we've committed to Mac OS X, and Apple has 
>committed to making
>OS X applications work with OS X Server.

I just hope Dantz supports OS X as well as they're supporting 
Windows.  Feature for feature, I prefer the Windows product over the 
Mac product now.



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Retro for Win & Regcopy

[Dean Brissinger]

Do I need to use regcopy if I run the Windows version of 
Retrospect with 5.0 clients?  I remember hearing a discussion that 
you do not need Regcopy.exe unless you are backing up using a 
Macintosh.

Also, I've been successfully backing up Windows machines to 
Retrospect on a Mac for a while.  I'm considering reversing the 
situation because I can get better backup performance from a Windows 
NT backup server.  If I backup Macintosh clients to Windows 
Retrospect, do I have any new complications I should know about? 
Does the restore procedure change for Mac clients?  Also, is the data 
on tape inter-compatible between platforms?



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
    .Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SOLVED! Regcopy

[Dean Brissinger]

I feel awfully silly for not noticing this sooner, but 
regcopy is leaving a record of the failure in the system event log. 
It finds a user profile mentioned in the registry that no longer 
lives on the local disk.  I removed this profile pointer from the 
registry and the problem went away.


Regcopy says:
SaveThisUserRegistry(S-1-5-21-251729357-1981883218-1846952604-500, 
%SystemRoot%\Profiles\administrator.000, c:\winnt\configbk, 1) failed 
in SaveUsersRegistry.,  %s, %s, %d) failed in SaveUsersRegistry.


This really means that HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows 
NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList\S-1-5-21-251729357-1981883218-1846952604 
-500 is not a valid profile.  Delete the S-* key and the problem goes 
away.  Specifically, if you read the keys, it finds 
"ProfileImagePath" to be a path in your %SYSTEM ROOT%\Profiles\ 
directory that doesn't have a user.dat file.





>>I get a failure  while trying to copy the registry on a few of my NT
>>machines.  However, it just says "Registry Copy Unsuccessful".  How
>>can I troubleshoot this and get my registry to back up?  I have one NT
>>Workstation doing this, and one NT Terminal Server.  They share nothing
>>in common that I'm aware of.
>
>I have this problem, but I also know that in my case the registry is 
>already corrupt! :-(
>--
>John Gee[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Dunedin, New ZealandProgrammers live in interesting times...
>
>
>
>--
>--
>To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
>Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Troubleshooting Regcopy

[Dean Brissinger]

The 'rdisk' utility completes the backup to disk and reports no 
errors.  To schedule rdisk  use the 'at' tool in NT.  =)


>Can you run Microsoft's built-in registry copy utility? This has generally
>better error reporting and may give you some more insight into what may be
>going wrong. It's pretty much the same as Regcopy anyway, except that I
>believe you can't schedule it, as you can with our Registry Backup Manager.
>
>If you're still having problems, feel free to call us directly.
>
>Regards,
>
>Matthew Tevenan
>Technical Support Specialist
>Dantz Development Corporation
>925.253.3050
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>  From: Dean Brissinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 22:02:29 -0700
>>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  Subject: Troubleshooting Regcopy
>>
>>  I get a failure  while trying to copy the registry on a few of my NT
>>  machines.  However, it just says "Registry Copy Unsuccessful".  How
>>  can I troubleshoot this and get my registry to back up?  I have one
>>  NT Workstation doing this, and one NT Terminal Server.  They share
>  > nothing in common that I'm aware of.


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Troubleshooting Regcopy

[Dean Brissinger]

I get a failure  while trying to copy the registry on a few of my NT 
machines.  However, it just says "Registry Copy Unsuccessful".  How 
can I troubleshoot this and get my registry to back up?  I have one 
NT Workstation doing this, and one NT Terminal Server.  They share 
nothing in common that I'm aware of.


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Win Retrospect Licenses?

[Dean Brissinger]

Do Retrospect for Windows client licenses work on the Mac edition and 
vice versa?  I'm considering buying a copy of Retrospect to run on an 
NT system, but want to be sure I can use the license pack on my Mac 
version OR my NT version.


-- 
. . . . . . . . ooo . . . . ooo . . . . . . . . .
.   .
.    Dean Brissinger - Systems Administrator.
.   Direct: 303-583-0278   Main: 303-444-0094   .
.   Fax: 303-444-0470  http://www.vexcel.com/   .
.   .
. . . . . . . oOOo . . A . . oOOo . . . . . . . .
  0 0
 '


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]