Re: Review Board 1.7.20 is out

[victoria]

Hi,

Review Board 1.7.20 is already available in Bitnami as well.

http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.


On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>
> We have a small bug fix release out. 1.7.20 fixes issues with JSON fields
> in the admin UI, compatibility issues with the Mercurial backend, API
> issues with file attachments, and more.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/12/10/review-board-1-7-20-released/
>
> We're gearing up for a new RBTools release with some real goodies, and
> another beta of Review Board 2.0. Stay tuned!
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> --
> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> ---
> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
> ---
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.6.21 and 1.7.17 released

[victoria]

Hi,

Review Board 1.7.18 is already in BitNami. Installers, virtual
machines and cloud images have been updated.

http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Matthew Woehlke
 wrote:
> On 2013-11-05 23:16, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> We just put out two new releases, 1.6.21 and 1.7.17. These fix a couple
>> security vulnerabilities, so please upgrade.
>>
>>> Users with the can_change_status permission no longer need the
>>> can_edit_reviewrequest permission in order to close or reopen
>>> review requests.
>
>
> Does this mean that bug 3011¹ is fixed?
>
> (¹ http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3011)
>
> --
> Matthew
>
>
> --
> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> ---
> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
> ---
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.14 is released

[victoria]

Hi,

The BitNami installers, virtual machines and cloud images have been
also updated. They include Django 1.4.8, Djblets 0.7.18 and Review
Board 1.7.14.

http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.

On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Christian Hammond
 wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Review Board 1.7.14 is out. As promised, it updates to the latest security
> release for Django, and has a handful of other bug fixes, including a small
> security fix affecting some users using private groups and repositories in
> the API.
>
> Along with this, we've added Team support for Bitbucket.
>
> More info at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/09/15/review-board-1-7-14-released/
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> --
> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> ---
> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
> ---
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Announce - BitNami installers for ReviewBoard updated (Django security update)

[victoria]

Hi,

Just wanted to let you know that we have released BitNami ReviewBoard
1.7.12-1. This version includes the latest version of Django 1.4 which
fixes two cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities

http://blog.bitnami.com/2013/08/new-django-v146-and-v152-released.html
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/aug/13/security-releases-issued/

Best regards,

Victoria.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12 released

[victoria]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On 07/28/2013 06:02 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We have a couple new releases tonight. Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12
>> focus on tightening security, and giving extension writers a couple new
>> abilities to make their lives easier.
>>
>> It's late here, so I'm going to direct you to the news post for further
>> information:
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/07/28/review-board-1-6-18-and-1-7-12-released/
>>
>> We also have a new guide on beefing up security for your file
>> attachments. This is especially important for those of you with public
>> installations, so please read it.
>>
>> http://support.beanbaginc.com/support/solutions/articles/110173-securing-file-attachments
>>
>
> Packages for Fedora 18, Fedora 19 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (and
> clones) are now available for testing at
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard
>
> They should appear in the 'updates-testing' or 'epel-testing' repository
> mirrors within 48 hours, or they can be downloaded manually and tried
> out from the link above. Please report any issues you discover with
> these packages to https://bugzilla.redhat.com and the ReviewBoard component.


The BitNami packages have been also udpated. BitNami ReviewBoard
1.7.12 installers, virtual machines and cloud images are already
available at http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard

>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board -Add Repository Issue(with Perforce)

[victoria]

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, RB  wrote:
> 1.I have installed perforce Command-Line Client(Version 2012.1). 2.Later i
> installed p4python27. As Bitnami Review Board stack comes with python 2.7.5
> and p4pyhon27 is compatible with python 2.7.5 there should not be any
> issues. 3.Later i installed latest Bitnami Review Board stack for windows.
> 4.Later i started both Apache Web Server and MySQL Database. I am able to
> acccess ReviewBoard log-in url. I have created a user. 5.Then when i try to
> add the perforce repository and save it, i am getting the following error:
> DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.


OK. I have finally been able to create a Perforce repository in
ReviewBoard. I used the public.perforce.com:1666 repository for
testing. This is the exact steps I followed:

 - Install BitNami ReviewBoard
 - Go to the Windows Start Menu -> BitNami ReviewBoard -> Register
BitNami Python in the Windows Registry.
 - Open the BitNami environment. Go to the Windows Start Menu ->
BitNami ReviewBoard -> Use BitNami
Reviewboard (this will open a windows command prompt).
 - Install p4python27.exe  from the command line (it needs to be the
32 bit binary). I used [this version][1]. Only the API component is
necessary.

Now to check that the module is loaded correctly in the Python version
installed with BitNami:

 - Execute `python`
 - In the python console execute `import P4`

If you don't receive any error from the console, it means that the
module is installed correctly. You are receiving the error when
accessing reviewboard because when importing that module in the
application running with apache + mod_wsgi the msvcr90.dll is not
found. (The issue is similar to [this][2]).

In order to fix you need to have installed [vcredist 2008 x86][3] and
the mt.exe tool installed. mt.exe is included in the [Microsoft
Windows Software Development Kit][4] (only the windows development
tools component is required). Then execute the following:

mt.exe 
-inputresource:c:\bitnami\reviewboard-1.7.11-0\python\bin\python.exe;#1
-out:pyd.manifest

mt.exe -manifest pyd.manifest
-outputresource:c:\bitnami\reviewboard-1.7.11-0\python\Lib\site-packages\P4API.pyd;#2

Restart apache and try to create a new Perforce repostiory.

I have also replied to you in the BitNami forums
(answers.bitnami.com). I hope this helps.

  [1]: http://www.mmnt.net/db/0/0/ftp.perforce.com/perforce/r12.1/bin.ntx86
  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/pyodbc/issues/detail?id=214
  [3]: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29
  [4]: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=3138


>
> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:13:24 PM UTC+5:30, victoria wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, RB  wrote:
>> > Hi ,
>> >
>> > I have installed Bitnami Review board stack for windows only. I have
>> > installed perforce(Version 2012.1) and p4python27 which is compatible
>> > with
>> > Python 2.7.5. But still i am getting the same issue.
>> > Can you suggest a solution for this.
>> >
>> > RB
>>
>> Can you explain the exact steps that you follow and point us to the
>> packages that you used? Thanks
>>
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:18:14 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> We don't support Review Board on Windows due to a number of
>> >> difficult-to-resolve compatibility errors with our dependencies.
>> >>
>> >> I'd recommend using a Linux machine (dedicated or in a VM), or the
>> >> BitNami
>> >> installer for Windows. The latter will make sure all your dependencies
>> >> are
>> >> correct.
>> >>
>> >> Some future enhancements to Review Board may not work on Windows, for
>> >> what
>> >> it's worth.
>> >>
>> >> Christian
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:43, RB  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have set-up ReviewBoard on windows 64-bit. I have installed P4 and
>> >> p4python. I am facing an issue while Adding Repository(perforce) in
>> >> Review
>> >> Board stack. I am getting the following error:
>> >> DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone faced the same issue. If so what could be the reason for
>> >> this
>> >> issue.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> >>

Re: Review Board -Add Repository Issue(with Perforce)

[victoria]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, RB  wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have installed Bitnami Review board stack for windows only. I have
> installed perforce(Version 2012.1) and p4python27 which is compatible with
> Python 2.7.5. But still i am getting the same issue.
> Can you suggest a solution for this.
>
> RB

Can you explain the exact steps that you follow and point us to the
packages that you used? Thanks

>
> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:18:14 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We don't support Review Board on Windows due to a number of
>> difficult-to-resolve compatibility errors with our dependencies.
>>
>> I'd recommend using a Linux machine (dedicated or in a VM), or the BitNami
>> installer for Windows. The latter will make sure all your dependencies are
>> correct.
>>
>> Some future enhancements to Review Board may not work on Windows, for what
>> it's worth.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:43, RB  wrote:
>>
>> I have set-up ReviewBoard on windows 64-bit. I have installed P4 and
>> p4python. I am facing an issue while Adding Repository(perforce) in Review
>> Board stack. I am getting the following error:
>> DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.
>>
>> Has anyone faced the same issue. If so what could be the reason for this
>> issue.
>>
>> --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

[victoria]

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Robert Burkhall  wrote:

>
> 0
> <http://answers.bitnami.com/vote/14546/down/>
>
> I found a workaround of the above issue that relates to Windows
> Installations.
>
> 1) CD {install
> path}\reviewboard-1.7.9-0\apps\reviewboard\Lib\site-packages
> 2) Verify that ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg & ReviewBoard-1.7.11-py2.7.egg
> exists
> 3) Rename ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg.old
> 4) Rename ReviewBoard-1.7.11-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg
> 5) Restart Apache service
> 6) Site is working normally
>
> I couldn't find the location in a config file that pointed to the old .egg
> folder, so making sure the new folder exists and renaming it worked. This
> is not the suggested fix, however it will get you over the issue for now.
>
>
Hi Robert,

Thanks for posting your solution. I saw that you also did it in the BItNami
forums. As you mention this is only a workaround. We will look into it on
our side. Thanks again!

Best regards,

Victoria.




> On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 11:11:10 AM UTC-4, Robert Burkhall wrote:
>
>> Hi Victoria,
>>
>>  The issue has been resolved with the release of 1.7.9.11, however I get
>> the following message after following the upgrade instructions.
>>
>>  Manual server updates required
>>
>> A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After
>> these changes are made, you should restart your server.
>>
>> If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing
>> list <http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard>.
>>  Review Board version mismatch
>>
>> The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site
>> was last upgraded to. You are running *1.7.9* and the site was last
>> upgraded to *1.7.11*.
>>
>> Please upgrade your site to fix this by running:
>>
>> $ rb-site upgrade 
>> C:/BitNami/reviewboard-1.7.9-**0/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/**reviewboard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 6:24:07 AM UTC-4, victoria wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Robert Burkhall 
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Victoria,
>>> >
>>> >  I like the the Reviewboard stack that's been created and it's only
>>> missing
>>> > the python-ldap.  However, I've seen a strange issue with IE that is
>>> not
>>> > apparent in Firefox or Chrome.  Has only else reported any issue using
>>> the
>>> > stack with IE9 in our case?
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> I'm glad that you like it. Regarding the python-ldap module, have you
>>> tried to install this 
>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**python-ldap/2.4.12<https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/2.4.12>
>>>
>>> ? What is the issue that you are finding with IE? Could it be related
>>> to JavaScript not enalbed or something like that? If that is not the
>>> case and it is shown correctly with Firefox and Chrome it seems to it
>>> could be an issue with the ReviewBoard web interface and IE support...
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:19:58 PM UTC-5, victoria wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a
>>> >> Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it
>>> and
>>> >> you can download it from
>>> >>
>>> >> http://bitnami.org/stack/**reviewboard<http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard>
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >> This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi,
>>> >> Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies.
>>> >>
>>> >> As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially
>>> >> supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and
>>> >> lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules
>>> >> made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people
>>> >> asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board
>>> as
>>> >> we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which
>>> >> includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility
>>> >> issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version
>>> >> for a production enviro

Re: Review Board 1.6.17 and 1.7.10 released

[victoria]

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On 06/22/2013 11:51 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We have two new releases out tonight. Both are important security
>> updates for a vulnerability that was reported to us that affects
>> primarily public-facing sites.
>>
>> 1.7.10 contains some additional bug fixes and improvements.
>>
>> For more info,
>> see 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/06/22/review-board-1617-and-1710-released/
>>
>
>
> Fedora and EPEL 6 packages are now on their way to the updates-testing
> repository. As this contains a fix for a security issue, I'd appreciate
> it if karma could be provided at the below links in order to push it to
> stable ASAP.
>
> **
> IMPORTANT: Fedora 17 is no longer supported for ReviewBoard[1], please
> upgrade to Fedora 18/19 or switch to using easy_install.
> **
>
>
>
>
> Fedora 19:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc19
>
> Fedora 18:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc18
>
> EPEL 6:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.el6
>
>
>
> If you wish to test these packages before they filter out to the
> mirrors, you can download the RPMs directly and install them with 'yum
> localinstall --nogpgcheck ReviewBoard*.rpm':
>
> Fedora 19:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.10/1.fc19/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc19.noarch.rpm
>
> Fedora 18:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.10/1.fc18/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
>
> EPEL 6:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.10/1.el6/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.10-1.el6.noarch.rpm
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] Fedora 17 has upgraded to Django 1.4 in the main repo. People who
> have been using ReviewBoard up to this point will have just been holding
> their local Django at 1.3 in yum. However, I can no longer build a new
> copy of ReviewBoard because 1.6.x won't build against Django 1.4 and
> ReviewBoard 1.7.x requires other dependencies that are two new to be
> carried in Fedora 17. If you need long-term supportability for
> ReviewBoard, I recommend using RHEL 6. Otherwise, please upgrade your
> systems to Fedora 18 or 19 (the latter which is in its release-candidate
> stage now and quite stable).
>

Review Board 1.7.10 released on BitNami as well. Installers, virtual
machines and cloud images available in
http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard



> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

[victoria]

Hi Robert,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Robert Burkhall  wrote:
> Hi Victoria,
>
>  I like the the Reviewboard stack that's been created and it's only missing
> the python-ldap.  However, I've seen a strange issue with IE that is not
> apparent in Firefox or Chrome.  Has only else reported any issue using the
> stack with IE9 in our case?
>
>

I'm glad that you like it. Regarding the python-ldap module, have you
tried to install this https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/2.4.12
? What is the issue that you are finding with IE? Could it be related
to JavaScript not enalbed or something like that? If that is not the
case and it is shown correctly with Firefox and Chrome it seems to it
could be an issue with the ReviewBoard web interface and IE support...

>
> On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:19:58 PM UTC-5, victoria wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a
>> Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it and
>> you can download it from
>>
>> http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard
>>
>> This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi,
>> Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies.
>>
>> As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially
>> supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and
>> lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules
>> made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people
>> asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board as
>> we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which
>> includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility
>> issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version
>> for a production environment but I'm sure that for lot of users will
>> find useful the Windows installer to give a try to ReviewBoard and
>> discover if it is the right solution for them. Also we will keep it
>> update so you can quickly test new versions when released. Please
>> notice that the the installation should be fully functional (although
>> not officially supported by the ReviewBoard team) and we will love to
>> hear from you if you find any issue so we can fix it.
>>
>> Christian I also wanted to take the opportunity to thank you for the
>> support you provide to me for getting this done :)
>>
>> Well I hope you all enjoy it!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Victoria.
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

[victoria]

Hi Warren,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Warren Postma  wrote:
>
> What is the nature of the problems on Windows?  Is Mercurial one of the
> problematic areas?  The docs say it's not supported, but don't give real
> details.

My understanding is that the main problem was the different
configuration that the users may have which make it difficult to
support. "Windows has proven to be a considerable challenge to
support. It is easy to end up with a subtly broken setup, due to so
many different and incompatible implementations of Python and various
Python modules." I don't think currently there is a specific issue
with Mercurial as it has been supported for a long time in Review
Board. However I think that the Review Board team will be able to give
you a better answer for this.

>
> I reported this issue to bitnami, not sure if it's a windows issue, or a
> mercurial + reviewboard issue:
>
> http://answers.bitnami.com/questions/14009/bitnami-reviewboard-version-17x-for-windows-the-file-was-not-found-in-the-repository-207
>
>
I see that you have already solved the issue. I'm glad for it and
thanks for posting the problem and the solution.

> The docs I read are a bit light on reasons:
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/windows/
>
> W
>

Best regards,

Victoria.

> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.9 is released

[victoria]

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On 06/04/2013 05:47 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher  > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tuesday, June 4, 2013, pfee wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Christian, Stephen,
> >>
> >> While testing Stephen's Fedora packages, on a F18 machine I
> >> upgraded from 1.7.7.1 to 1.7.9.  Following the upgrade, I expected
> >> visiting the site's /dashboard URL would have told me to run
> >> "rb-site upgrade".  Instead I got a 500 "Something broke..."
> message.
> >>
> >> Despite not being prompted, I ran "rb-site upgrade
> >> /var/www/reviewboard" anyway.  The site came back to life and
> >> started working again as expected, however someone upgrading for
> >> the first time would not know to do this.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ah, thanks for reminding me. Not that anyone actually reads the
> >> updates notes, but I usually put a reminder in that you always need to
> >> run rb-site upgrade after installing the packages. I'll tweak the
> >> update notes when I get to work.
> >>
> >> I've been meaning to patch the Fedora packages to do this
> >> automatically, by having rb-site install save a config file with a
> >> list of installed sites so I can have the %post script run the upgrade
> >> on package install.
> >
> > I've actually been wanting such a file for Review Board upstream that
> > rb-site can write to, so that we can be more intelligent about upgrades.
> > If you come up with a good way to do it, let me know :)
> >
>
>
> Has Review Board formally and without question dropped Windows support?
> If so, it becomes reasonably easy to hardcode a requirement on a file
> such as /etc/ReviewBoard/sites which could be as simple as
> one-path-per-line, and then patch rb-site to amend it when doing an
> install and to iterate through it when calling 'rb-site upgrade' with no
> arguments.
>
> Then all I would have to do in the Fedora packages is call 'rb-site
> upgrade' in the %post section on upgrades.
>


Just a comment from BitNami. Even if Windows is not supported it would be
great you don't have any path hardcoded.  Currently we allow to have
different installations in the systems in different installation paths,
installing as root as an not root user. Of course this is also possible
without using the BitNami installers. Having that hardcoded will affect
this flexibility. If those are necessary I would suggest to have default
values..but not hardcoded and not customizables values.



> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Getting 403 Forbidden when accessing Reviewboard

[victoria]

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 04:01 AM, Justin O'Doherty wrote:
>> # cat /proc/version
>> Linux version 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 (mockbu...@hs20-bc2-4.build.redhat.com
>> ) (gcc version 4.1.2
>> 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52)) #1 SMP Wed Mar 28 01:54:56 EDT 2012
>> Architecture: x86_64
>>
>> I had a look in the EPEL repository that you mentioned, but couldnt see
>> a compatible package for the system.
>>
>
> Ok, you're on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. I can only support up to
> ReviewBoard 1.5.7 on that platform natively because the system version
> of Python is only 2.4.
>
> Since the OS is so old, I haven't gone through the effort of packaging
> up all of ReviewBoard's dependencies against the python26 alternate
> compiler in EPEL.
>
> Is there a reason that ReviewBoard needs to be installed on this
> particular (very old) OS, or can you look at RHEL 6 (or perhaps
> something like OpenShift, BitNami or of course RBCommons for hosting?)
>

Regarding BitNami, the linux installer may also work for you if using
the native system packages is not a requirement. It bundles Apache,
Python and mod_wsgi and it will not use the (old) system packages.


>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.7.1 is released

[victoria]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On Sun 21 Apr 2013 05:05:19 PM EDT, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> We had a regression when creating new site installations. While
>> unfortunate, it gave us the opportunity for a cool version number. So
>> it all works out in the end.
>>
>> Review Board 1.7.7.1 is out. If you already have a working site, then
>> no need to upgrade, but if you had trouble creating a site, get it.
>>
>> Release notes are
>> available: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.7.1/
>>
>
>
> Packages for Fedora 18, 19 and RHEL/CentOS 6 have been built and will be
> showing up in the updates-testing or epel-testing repositories within 48
> hours. Please remember that you will need to run 'rb-site upgrade
> /path/to/site' after installing these new packages.
>
> Fedora:
> yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ReviewBoard
>
> RHEL:
> yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing ReviewBoard
>
>
> The Bodhi update links can be found at:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ReviewBoard
>
> If you install these testing packages and find issues or they work
> properly, please note this on the Web UI so I can know when it's safe to
> submit them for the stable repositories.


Hi,

Just wanted to let you know that the BitNami installers, virtual
machine and cloud images for ReviewBoard have been also updated.

http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: New BitNami Review Board Stack

[victoria]

Hi,


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:11 PM, mohan boddu  wrote:

> Fernando,
>
> I installed your BitNami review board tool and I would like to thank you
> since the installation pretty simple and hassle free.
>
> Now, I want to integrate it with mercurial. Could you please let me know
> how to integrate it with mercurial.
>



Which version of the BitNami stack are you using and in which platform?


>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:07:52 AM UTC-6, fern...@bitrock.com wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Sridhar, looking forward to your feedback!
>>
>> Fernando Ruiz
>>
>> On Feb 13, 11:12 pm, Sridhar Srigiriraju  wrote:
>> > Fernando,
>> >
>> > I really appreciate the effort you have taken up. I recently finished
>> > installing review board on our Linux server and was thoroughly
>> frustrated
>> > because of all the underlying dependencies. It took me several
>> iterations
>> > to figure out on how to just get it up and running.
>> >
>> > I will will definitely check this out and let you know feedback, if any
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Sridhar
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Fernando Ruiz 
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> >
>> > > I am one of the BitNami project developers. We package popular
>> > > opensource web applications and make them
>> > > available as freely available installers, virtual machines and Amazon
>> > > Machine images. I am writing because I wanted to
>> > > let you know that we are working on an installer that greatly
>> > > simplifies the installation of Review Board and runtime dependencies.
>> > > It includes ready-to-run versions of Apache (with mod_wsgi), MySQL,
>> > > Python and Memcached. It also includes integration with Subversion,
>> > > Git and Mercurial out of the box.
>> >
>> > > You can download it here:
>> >
>> > >http://clients.bitrock.com/files/reviewboard/20120210/**
>> > > bitnami-reviewboard-1.6.3-0-linux-installer.run> clients.bitrock.com/files/**reviewboard/20120210/bitnami-**reviewb...>
>>
>> > >  md5: 50b1e9f212f09fb13bb988839d2df885
>> >
>> > >http://clients.bitrock.com/files/reviewboard/20120210/**
>> > > bitnami-reviewboard-1.6.3-0-linux-x64-installer.run> /clients.bitrock.com/files/**reviewboard/20120210/bitnami-**reviewb...>
>>
>> > >  md5: 359dcd6dcee3ea67d263c04aaeee3a59
>> >
>> > > If you have a few minutes, we would appreciate if you can check the
>> > > stack and provide your feedback and suggestions. We plan to release
>> > > the native installers (for Linux), pre-configured virtual machines
>> and
>> > > Amazon Images soon but we would really like to have your feedback
>> > > first, to make sure we
>> > > are not making any dumb mistakes and to learn about any improvement
>> > > suggestions you may have.
>> >
>> > > Please let us know if this is not the right place to ask for this
>> kind
>> > > of feedback
>> >
>> > > Best regards,
>> >
>> > > Fernando Ruiz
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> >
>>
>> > > Happy user? Let us know 
>> > > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> >
>>
>> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@**
>>
>> > > googlegroups.com 
>> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/**
>> > > group/reviewboard?hl=en > group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> >
>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this gr

Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

[victoria]

Hi,

As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a
Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it and
you can download it from

http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard

This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi,
Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies.

As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially
supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and
lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules
made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people
asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board as
we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which
includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility
issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version
for a production environment but I'm sure that for lot of users will
find useful the Windows installer to give a try to ReviewBoard and
discover if it is the right solution for them. Also we will keep it
update so you can quickly test new versions when released. Please
notice that the the installation should be fully functional (although
not officially supported by the ReviewBoard team) and we will love to
hear from you if you find any issue so we can fix it.

Christian I also wanted to take the opportunity to thank you for the
support you provide to me for getting this done :)

Well I hope you all enjoy it!

Best regards,

Victoria.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

ReviewBoard test servers in the cloud

[victoria]

Hi,

As you may already know, in BitNami we focus on making open source
packages (like ReviewBoard) easier to use by providing pre-configured
installers, virtual machines and Amazon/Azure cloud images. We are now
working on an experimental product to allow users to test the latest
version of ReviewBoard in the cloud, for free. We don't provide ssh
access and have limited it (for now) to just 10 server launches to
prevent abuse, but it should be an excellent tool for potential new
users to play with ReviewBoard before they decide to install it.

http://bitnami.org/launch/reviewboard

Please give it a try and let us know if you run into any issues or
have any suggestions for improvement.

Best regards,

Victoria.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.6 is released!

[victoria]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On Thu 21 Feb 2013 10:14:29 AM CET, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> 1.7.6 is out. The big highlight is support for Perforce ticket-based
>> auth, which I know will make a lot of you happy.
>>
>> There's also a scattering of fixes and feature enhancements.
>>
>> See http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.7.6/ for
>> more information.
>>
>
> I've released updated Fedora 18 and Rawhide packages for ReviewBoard 1.7.6:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-djblets-0.7.11-1.fc18,ReviewBoard-1.7.6-1.fc18
>

Review Board 1.7.6 released on BitNami as well. Installers, virtual
machines and cloud images available in
http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard

> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.5 released

[victoria]

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 02:37 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Review Board 1.7.5 is out. It fixes a few, mostly small problems people
>> have hit, and a major compatibility change with the newly released
>> django-pipeline 1.3.
>>

Also installers, virtual machines and cloud images for ReviewBoard
1.7.5 ready in  BitNami (sorry for the delay).

http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.



>> If you installed 1.7.4 in the past week, you may have had a crash when
>> accessing most pages, possibly saying "CompilerError." This was due to
>> some compatibility changes in django-pipeline 1.3 that we still need to
>> investigate. However, that release also dropped Python 2.5 support,
>> which means we'll be requiring 1.2.24 from here on out. My apologies to
>> any packagers that this affects.
>>
>> See the release notes for the full list of changes:
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.7.5/
>>
>> Christian
>>
>
> Fedora 18 packages are submitted and should be appearing in the
> updates-testing repository within 24 hours.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-1.fc18,python-djblets-0.7.9-2.fc18
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

[victoria]

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> Great! Thanks Victoria :)
>
> We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows 
> users in the docs and site.
>

Hey! Thanks but we are still working on Windows :) I plan to send you
a beta build today or on Monday so you can take a look at it.

> Christian
>
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:22 AM, victoria  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to let you know that in BitNami we have already released
>> installers, vms and cloud images for ReviewBoard 1.7.4. You can get
>> them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Victoria.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Hammond  
>> wrote:
>>> Ah, okay. Well you definitely don't want to run a production site that way,
>>> but for a dev environment, sure. What you may be hitting is stale generated
>>> media files. Check to see if you have a reviewboard/htdocs/static/
>>> directory. If so, delete it and restart, see if it improves.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>>
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Tao Zhou  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Christian:
>>>
>>> Yes, you are quite right. As I didn't use virtualenv and didn't know how to
>>> upgrade an existing site,
>>>
>>> I just start reviewboard with 'manage.py runserver' with latest code and
>>> thought it was same with deployed one,
>>>
>>> I will later cleanup my environment and have a test and see if the issue was
>>> fixed or not next Monday.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Tao
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:41:20 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tao,
>>>>
>>>> This doesn't look like you're running a standard install, but rather a
>>>> development install. Am I correct?
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tao Zhou  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Christian:
>>>>
>>>> Seems the view diff issue for clearcase repo on Windows has not been fixed
>>>> completely in this release,
>>>> I have tried and now all diffs could be displayed normally, but the
>>>> spinning.gif keeping loading and loading,
>>>> and below is the error message on Chrome console
>>>>
>>>> Resource interpreted as Image but transferred with MIME type image/x-png:
>>>> "http://localhost:8080/reviews/static/rb/images/edit.png";.
>>>> jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>>>
>>>> Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function reviews.js:1840
>>>>
>>>> (anonymous function)reviews.js:1840
>>>> kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>>> l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>>> p.extend.readyjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>>> Djquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>>>
>>>> isshow:false
>>>>
>>>> and if click on diff area to ad comment, it fails, with new error message
>>>> as below:
>>>>
>>>> Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'create' of undefined
>>>> diffviewer.js:279
>>>>
>>>> $.extend.showCommentDlgdiffviewer.js:279
>>>> endSelectiondiffviewer.js:553
>>>> (anonymous function)diffviewer.js:419
>>>> p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>>> g.handle.h
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:08:28 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Review Board 1.7.4 is out. It fixes a couple problems with 1.7.3 that
>>>>> users of IE and developers generating patches on Windows have hit. It's a
>>>>> pretty small release, but if you have 1.7.3 installed, you should upgrade.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/201

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

[victoria]

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that in BitNami we have already released
installers, vms and cloud images for ReviewBoard 1.7.4. You can get
them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> Ah, okay. Well you definitely don't want to run a production site that way,
> but for a dev environment, sure. What you may be hitting is stale generated
> media files. Check to see if you have a reviewboard/htdocs/static/
> directory. If so, delete it and restart, see if it improves.
>
> Christian
>
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Tao Zhou  wrote:
>
> Hi, Christian:
>
> Yes, you are quite right. As I didn't use virtualenv and didn't know how to
> upgrade an existing site,
>
> I just start reviewboard with 'manage.py runserver' with latest code and
> thought it was same with deployed one,
>
> I will later cleanup my environment and have a test and see if the issue was
> fixed or not next Monday.
>
> Thanks!
> Tao
>
> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:41:20 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tao,
>>
>> This doesn't look like you're running a standard install, but rather a
>> development install. Am I correct?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tao Zhou  wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Christian:
>>
>> Seems the view diff issue for clearcase repo on Windows has not been fixed
>> completely in this release,
>> I have tried and now all diffs could be displayed normally, but the
>> spinning.gif keeping loading and loading,
>> and below is the error message on Chrome console
>>
>> Resource interpreted as Image but transferred with MIME type image/x-png:
>> "http://localhost:8080/reviews/static/rb/images/edit.png";.
>> jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>
>> Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function reviews.js:1840
>>
>> (anonymous function)reviews.js:1840
>> kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>> l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>> p.extend.readyjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>> Djquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>>
>> isshow:false
>>
>> and if click on diff area to ad comment, it fails, with new error message
>> as below:
>>
>> Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'create' of undefined
>> diffviewer.js:279
>>
>> $.extend.showCommentDlgdiffviewer.js:279
>> endSelectiondiffviewer.js:553
>> (anonymous function)diffviewer.js:419
>> p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2
>> g.handle.h
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:08:28 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Review Board 1.7.4 is out. It fixes a couple problems with 1.7.3 that
>>> users of IE and developers generating patches on Windows have hit. It's a
>>> pretty small release, but if you have 1.7.3 installed, you should upgrade.
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/30/review-board-1-7-4-released/
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> review

Re: Review Board 1.7.2 is released

[victoria]

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher <
step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:

> On 01/17/2013 01:58 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Review Board 1.7.2 is out. Lots of bug fixes and a few new features. See
> > the news post and release notes for more info.
> >
> > http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/16/review-board-1-7-2-released/
> >
> > We'll have a new RBTools out pretty soon with some nice improvements as
> > well.
>
>
BitNami installers, vms and cloud images for 1.7.2 are also available at
http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard


>
> Fedora packages are now available for testing:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.2-1.fc18
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

[victoria]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM, victoria  wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Matthew Woehlke
>  wrote:
> > On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote:
> >>
> >> Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found
> >> bitnami review board but they only have 1.6
>
> In BitNami we are already working on the installers and virtual
> appliances for Review Board 1.7. I will let you know as soon as they
> are ready.
>
>
I just wanted to let you know that the BitNami installers, virtual machines
and cloud images are already available for download. You can find them in
http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.



> Best regards,
>
> Victoria.
>
> >> Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would
> >> CentOS 6.3 work?
> >
> >
> > If you're willing to run non-LTS Fedora, and the still-in-beta version 18
> > thereof, I'm happily doing likewise using Stephen's packages of RB 1.7.1.
> >
> > --
> > Matthew
> >
> >
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> >
> >
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

[victoria]

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Matthew Woehlke
 wrote:
> On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote:
>>
>> Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found
>> bitnami review board but they only have 1.6

In BitNami we are already working on the installers and virtual
appliances for Review Board 1.7. I will let you know as soon as they
are ready.

Best regards,

Victoria.

>> Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would
>> CentOS 6.3 work?
>
>
> If you're willing to run non-LTS Fedora, and the still-in-beta version 18
> thereof, I'm happily doing likewise using Stephen's packages of RB 1.7.1.
>
> --
> Matthew
>
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released

[victoria]

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Can Özmen  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I did Option B and I'm now on 1.6.6. Great :-)
>
> Thanks for the help. That was quick. I really appreciate it.
>
> P.S. rb-site died on me complaining about not finding libreadline5.so even
> when libreadline6 was installed. But I was logged in as bitnami and the
> bitnami environment was not loaded, maybe that's why. I'll be happy to send
> any outputs or logs.

Hi

I didn't get that error even if the bitnami environment is not loaded.
If you have the chance of try it and you reproduce it. Could you copy
the command that you executed and the output you get? In any case as
mentioned it may be just that bitnami environment was not loaded.

I'm glad that you got it working! :)

>
> --
> Can Özmen
>
> On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, victoria wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Can Özmen  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was able to install 1.6.6 with the -U option. Both the .egg and rb-site
> script seems to be updated correctly.
>
> I then had to install libreadline5 via apt-get to get rb-site working.
>
> But rb-site still fails with:
>   pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: ReviewBoard==1.6.6
>
> Is there way to see where setuptools is looking for packages/distributions?
> Should I delete the 1.6.5 .egg?
>
>
> Why did you need to install libreadline5? And when do you get that
> error? What are you executing? This is what I execute and works for
> me:
>
> sudo easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir
> apps/reviewboard/bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard
>
> Then if you execute the rb-site comand you will get the error below
> (sorry I previously missed this step)
>
> bitnami@xxx:~$ /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade
> /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
> /opt/bitnami/python/bin/.python.bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: libpython2.6.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No
> such file or director
>
> This is because rb-site is not loading the bitnami environment. If you
> open the rb-site script you will see that it is pointing to
> .python.bin.
>
> You can:
>
> Option A.-
> Edit rb-site and change .python.bin with python.
> bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade
> /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database. This may take a while.
> Creating tables ...
> Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.5 to 1.6.6
> Installing custom SQL ...
> Installing indexes ...
> No fixtures found.
> No evolution required.
> Resetting in-database caches.
> Upgrade complete.
>
> Option B.- Login as root and load the bitnami environment
>
> bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo su
> root@xxx:/home/bitnami# . /opt/bitnami/scripts/setenv.sh <-- notice
> the space between the dot and the script path.
> root@domU-12-31-39-0A-25-90:/home/bitnami#
> /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade
> /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database. This may take a while.
> Creating tables ...
> Installing custom SQL ...
> Installing indexes ...
> No fixtures found.
> No evolution required.
> Resetting in-database caches.
> Upgrade complete.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Can.
>
> --
> Can Özmen
>
> On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, victoria wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 1, 7:11 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
>
> Thank you Victoria,
>
> easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked.
> I'll wait a few days more I guess.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> With easy_install you should download ReviewBoard from the official
> repository. I tested the steps on my side and with option -U
> ReviewBoard it worked for me and found the the new version 1.6.6
> (don't forget to use also the other options so it doesn't install the
> new version in a different location).
>
> Happy Workers Day,
> Can.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2
> instance.
>
>
> What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the
>
> admin
>
> dashboard of the app.
>
>
> P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary.
>
>
> For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into
> account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the
> ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two
> steps:
>
>
> 1

Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released

[victoria]

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Can Özmen  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was able to install 1.6.6 with the -U option. Both the .egg and rb-site
> script seems to be updated correctly.
>
> I then had to install libreadline5 via apt-get to get rb-site working.
>
> But rb-site still fails with:
>   pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: ReviewBoard==1.6.6
>
> Is there way to see where setuptools is looking for packages/distributions?
> Should I delete the 1.6.5 .egg?
>

Why did you need to install libreadline5? And when do you get that
error? What are you executing? This is what I execute and works for
me:

sudo easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir
apps/reviewboard/bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard

Then if you execute the rb-site comand you will get the error below
(sorry I previously missed this step)

bitnami@xxx:~$ /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade
/opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
/opt/bitnami/python/bin/.python.bin: error while loading shared
libraries: libpython2.6.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or director

This is because rb-site is not loading the bitnami environment. If you
open the rb-site script you will see that it is pointing to
.python.bin.

You can:

Option A.-
Edit rb-site and change .python.bin with python.
bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade
/opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.5 to 1.6.6
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
No fixtures found.
No evolution required.
Resetting in-database caches.
Upgrade complete.

Option B.- Login as root and load the bitnami environment

bitnami@xxx:~$ sudo su
root@xxx:/home/bitnami# . /opt/bitnami/scripts/setenv.sh  <-- notice
the space between the dot and the script path.
root@domU-12-31-39-0A-25-90:/home/bitnami#
/opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade
/opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
Creating tables ...
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
No fixtures found.
No evolution required.
Resetting in-database caches.
Upgrade complete.



> Thanks,
> Can.
>
> --
> Can Özmen
>
> On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, victoria wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 1, 7:11 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
>
> Thank you Victoria,
>
> easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked.
> I'll wait a few days more I guess.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> With easy_install you should download ReviewBoard from the official
> repository. I tested the steps on my side and with option -U
> ReviewBoard it worked for me and found the the new version 1.6.6
> (don't forget to use also the other options so it doesn't install the
> new version in a different location).
>
> Happy Workers Day,
> Can.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2
> instance.
>
>
> What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the
>
> admin
>
> dashboard of the app.
>
>
> P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary.
>
>
> For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into
> account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the
> ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two
> steps:
>
>
> 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami
> environment and execute:
>
>
> easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/
> bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard
>
>
> 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/
> apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
>
>
> /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/
> reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
>
>
> In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be
> easier just launched a new instance.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Victoria.
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>
> Hey everyone,
>
>
> Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API
>
> tokens
>
> for private repos.
>
>
> See the news post and release notes at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/
>
>
> Christian
>
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VM

Re: Review Board Bitnami stack blog post

[victoria]

On Apr 1, 3:22 pm, Jim Priest  wrote:
> I'm doing a presentation of Review Board at an upcoming development
> conference and was tinkering around with Review Board on Bitnami.
>
> The installation process was very easy - hopefully this will open the door
> to more Review Board users who were intimidated by installation.
>
> I blogged about it here:  
> http://thecrumb.com/2012/03/31/review-board-on-virtualbox/
>

Hi I'm from the BitNami team and it seem that I missed this message in
the list. Thanks for using BitNami! If you have any feedback good or
bad I will be glad to hear it! Suggestions accepted.

> Thanks!
> Jim

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released

[victoria]

On May 1, 7:11 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
> Thank you Victoria,
>
> easy_install could only find 1.6.5 from Bitnami's repo the last I checked.
> I'll wait a few days more I guess.
>

Hi,

With easy_install you should download ReviewBoard from the official
repository. I tested the steps on my side and with option -U
ReviewBoard it worked for me and found the the new version 1.6.6
(don't forget to use also the other options so it doesn't install the
new version in a different location).

> Happy Workers Day,
> Can.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:52:15 PM UTC+3, victoria wrote:
>
> > On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
> > > Hi All,
>
> > > Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2
> > > instance.
>
> > > What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the
> > admin
> > > dashboard of the app.
>
> > > P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary.
>
> > For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into
> > account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the
> > ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two
> > steps:
>
> > 1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami
> > environment and execute:
>
> > easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/
> > bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard
>
> > 2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/
> > apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
>
> > /opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/
> > reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard
>
> > In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be
> > easier just launched a new instance.
>
> > Best regards,
>
> > Victoria.
>
> > > On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> > > > Hey everyone,
>
> > > > Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API
> > tokens
> > > > for private repos.
>
> > > > See the news post and release notes at
> > > >http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/
>
> > > > Christian
>
> > > > --
> > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released

[victoria]

On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2
> instance.
>
> What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin
> dashboard of the app.
>
> P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary.
>
>
>

For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into
account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the
ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two
steps:

1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami
environment and execute:

easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/
bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard

2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/
apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard

/opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/
reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard

In any case if as you mention you don't have any data yet, it may be
easier just launched a new instance.

Best regards,

Victoria.



>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
>
> > Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens
> > for private repos.
>
> > See the news post and release notes at
> >http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/
>
> > Christian
>
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.6 released

[victoria]

On Apr 30, 4:50 pm, Can Özmen  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Great work. I have a fresh 1.6.5 installed through BitNami on an EC2
> instance.
>
> What's the upgrade procedure? Couldn't find it on the site or in the admin
> dashboard of the app.
>
> P.S. I have nothing in my install so I can wipe if necessary.
>

For upgrading the BitNami installation you only need to take into
account the path in which ReviewBoard is installed. According to the
ReviewBoard official documentation the upgrade will involves two
steps:

1.- Upgrade ReviewBoard with easy_install. Load the BitNami
environment and execute:

easy_install --prefix apps/reviewboard --script-dir apps/reviewboard/
bin --install-dir apps/reviewboard/lib -U ReviewBoard

2.- Upgrade your sites. The default site is created in /opt/bitnami/
apps/reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard

/opt/bitnami/apps/reviewboard/bin/rb-site upgrade /opt/bitnami/apps/
reviewboard/rb-sites/reviewboard

Best regards,

Victoria.

>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:50:37 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
>
> > Review Board 1.6.6 is out, and adds support for getting GitHub API tokens
> > for private repos.
>
> > See the news post and release notes at
> >http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/04/25/review-board-166-released/
>
> > Christian
>
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en