Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[李海梅]

can you tell me how you solve the problem "runtimeerror: failed to build 
media..".
you mentioned that you install jsmin..what's that?
hope to get your reply.
thank you...

在 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8下午2时53分07秒，kvr写道：
>
> Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing *jsmin*  
> ...
>
> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>>
>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
>> release.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

You really should be using the packages and not the tarball.

If you're using Python 2.4, you will need to upgrade to a newer 2.x release 
(2.7 is recommended).

Christian


On Dec 21, 2012, at 23:55, 李海梅  wrote:

> can you tell me how you solve the problem "runtimeerror: failed to build 
> media..".
> you mentioned that you install jsmin..what's that?
> hope to get your reply.
> thank you...
> 
> 在 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8下午2时53分07秒，kvr写道：
>> 
>> Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing jsmin  ...
>> 
>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey everyone,
>>> 
>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 
>>> beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather 
>>> than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>> 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
>>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
>>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
>>> release.
>>> 
>>> Christian
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing *jsmin*  ...

On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

You'd need RB 1.7 beta 2 and the accompanying Djblets, and a newer django
pipeline.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:52 PM, kvr  wrote:

> Here is the output of ./contrib/internal/build-media.py
>
> Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_clicked.png' (not
> modified)
> Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.ico' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/diff.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/subnav-bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/comment-small.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg_trans.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/comment-draft-small.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.svg' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/dropdown.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/disabled.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/reviewrequest.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_hover.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/button_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/star_off.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/list.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/db-add.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/logo.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/title_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_clicked.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/fish-trophy.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/gold_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/warning.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/shipit.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/delete.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/closed_issue.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/favicon.ico' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/cancel_grey.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/star_on.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/shipit_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/collapse.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/tick.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/rss.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/blank.gif' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/upload.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/convo.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/shipit_checkmark.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_hover.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/spinner.gif' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/resize-grip.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/gold_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/edit.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/comment-shipit-small.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/open_issue.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/favicon.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/box_top_bg_trans.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/trophy.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/delete.svg' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/moved_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/important.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/expand.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/toggleOn.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/pinstripes.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrowSel.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/selection.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/whiteButton.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/toolbar.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/thumb.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/cancel.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/blueButton.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/toggle.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrow.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/listGroup.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/backButton.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/grayButton.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/iphone/toolButton.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/set-auth.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/set-storage.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/wid-max.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg_primary.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/divid.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/alert_bg.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/set-log.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/gears.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/wid-min.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/set-ssh.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 'images/admin/monitor.png' (not modified)
> Skipping 

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

Here is the output of ./contrib/internal/build-media.py

Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_clicked.png' (not 
modified)
Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.ico' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/diff.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/subnav-bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/comment-small.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg_trans.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/comment-draft-small.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.svg' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/dropdown.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/disabled.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/reviewrequest.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_hover.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/button_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/star_off.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/list.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/db-add.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/logo.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/title_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_clicked.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/fish-trophy.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/gold_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/warning.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/shipit.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/delete.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/closed_issue.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/favicon.ico' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/cancel_grey.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/star_on.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/shipit_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/collapse.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/tick.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/rss.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/blank.gif' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/upload.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/convo.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/shipit_checkmark.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_hover.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/spinner.gif' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/resize-grip.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/gold_box_top_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/edit.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/comment-shipit-small.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/open_issue.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/favicon.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/box_top_bg_trans.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/trophy.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/delete.svg' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/moved_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/important.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/expand.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/toggleOn.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/pinstripes.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrowSel.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/selection.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/whiteButton.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/toolbar.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/thumb.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/cancel.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/blueButton.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/toggle.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrow.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/listGroup.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/backButton.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/grayButton.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/iphone/toolButton.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/set-auth.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/set-storage.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/wid-max.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg_primary.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/divid.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/alert_bg.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/set-log.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/gears.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/wid-min.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/set-ssh.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/monitor.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/play.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/yellow_bg_small.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/admin/set-diff.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/mimetypes/x-office-address-book.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/mimetypes/text-x-generic.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/mimetypes/x-office-document.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'images/mimetypes/x-office-presentation-template.png' (not 
modified)
Skipping 'images/mime

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

There should be more than this. There should be some output from the script
being run.

Run ./contrib/internal/build-media.py manually and see what happens.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, kvr  wrote:

>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py",
> line 172, in run
> self.run_command("egg_info")
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "setup.py", line 63, in run
> self.run_command('build_media')
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "setup.py", line 81, in run
> raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
>
> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
>
> These are last few lines of the exception thrown during building egg in
> Ubuntu.
>
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:37 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
> wrote:
>
>> You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to
>> give you any information on a fix.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr  wrote:
>>
>> No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while
>> building the media files in Ubuntu also.
>>
>> On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build
>>> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
>>> wrote:

 Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things
 that must be installed in order to build the package.

 Christian

>>>
>>>
 I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.

>>>
>>>  setup.py bdist_egg
>>>
>>> And the result is given below.
>>>
>>> running bdist_egg
>>> running egg_info
>>> running build_media
>>> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application
>>>

 But 1.6.x code got successfully built.

>>>
>>>
 On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:

 May I know how did you make the egg file?

 Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.

 On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
 wrote:
>
> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7
> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to
>> install from source.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review
>>> Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, 
>>> but
>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**new**s/2012/08/03/review-board-**17-**
>>> beta-1-released/
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a
>>> beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any
>>> testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a
>>> higher-quality release.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>  --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/
>> -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.**com
>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>> group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py", 
line 172, in run
self.run_command("egg_info")
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files

These are last few lines of the exception thrown during building egg in 
Ubuntu.

On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:37 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to 
> give you any information on a fix.
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr > wrote:
>
> No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building 
> the media files in Ubuntu also.
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
>> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things 
>>> that must be installed in order to build the package.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>  
>>
>>> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>>>
>>  
>>  setup.py bdist_egg
>>
>> And the result is given below.
>>
>> running bdist_egg
>> running egg_info
>> running build_media
>> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 
>>
>>>
>>> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>>>
>>  
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>>>
>>> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>> wrote:

 In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
 dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:

> Thanks for your reply.
>
> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to 
> install from source.
>
>
> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review 
>> Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, 
>> but 
>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>> 17-beta-1-released/
>>
>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a 
>> beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any 
>> testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>> higher-quality release.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>  -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

  -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, vi

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to give you 
any information on a fix.

Christian



On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr  wrote:

> No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building 
> the media files in Ubuntu also.
> 
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr  wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that 
>> must be installed in order to build the package.
>> 
>> Christian
>>  
>> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>>  
>>  setup.py bdist_egg
>> 
>> And the result is given below.
>> 
>> running bdist_egg
>> running egg_info
>> running build_media
>> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 
>> 
>> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>>  
>> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:
>> 
>>> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>>> 
>>> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>>> 
>>> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>> wrote:
>>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
>>> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>>> 
>>> Christian
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>> 
>>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
>>> from source.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>> Hey everyone,
>>> 
>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 
>>> beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather 
>>> than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>> 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
>>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
>>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
>>> release.
>>> 
>>> Christian
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> 
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>> -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> 
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building 
the media files in Ubuntu also.

On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr > wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things 
>> that must be installed in order to build the package.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>  
>
>> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>>
>  
>  setup.py bdist_egg
>
> And the result is given below.
>
> running bdist_egg
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 
>
>>
>> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>>
>  
>
>> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:
>>
>> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>>
>> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>>
>> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
>>> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>>
 Thanks for your reply.

 But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to 
 install from source.


 On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review 
> Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, 
> but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
> 17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
> would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
> higher-quality release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
  -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>>  -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
infrastructure are assuming unixisms.

Christian


On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr  wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that 
> must be installed in order to build the package.
> 
> Christian
>  
> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>  
>  setup.py bdist_egg
> 
> And the result is given below.
> 
> running bdist_egg
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 
> 
> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>  
> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:
> 
>> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>> 
>> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>> 
>> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies 
>> have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>> 
>> Christian
>> 
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> 
>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
>> from source.
>> 
>> 
>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>> 
>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 
>> beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather 
>> than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>> 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>> 
>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
>> release.
>> 
>> Christian
>> 
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> 
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> 
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
wrote:
>
> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things 
> that must be installed in order to build the package.
>
> Christian
>
 

> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>
 
 setup.py bdist_egg

And the result is given below.

running bdist_egg
running egg_info
running build_media
error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 

>
> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>
 

> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr > wrote:
>
> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>
> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>
> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
>> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
>>> from source.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
 Hey everyone,

 I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
 rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
 17-beta-1-released/

 Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
 so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
 would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
 higher-quality release.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com

 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

>>>  -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that 
must be installed in order to build the package.

Christian



On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:

> May I know how did you make the egg file?
> 
> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
> 
> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies 
> have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
> 
> Christian
> 
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from 
> source.
> 
> 
> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> 
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 
> beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than 
> repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
> 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
> 
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use 
> your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
> 
> Christian
> 
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
> 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

May I know how did you make the egg file?

Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.

On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
wrote:
>
> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
>> from source.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
>>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>>> 17-beta-1-released/
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
>>> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
>>> would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>>> higher-quality release.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7
dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:

> Thanks for your reply.
>
> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install
> from source.
>
>
> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board
>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but
>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>> 17-beta-1-released/
>>
>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so
>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would
>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality
>> release.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

Thanks for your reply.

But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
from source.

On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

You shouldn't install from source. Please use the egg files we distribute.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:41 PM, kvr  wrote:

> Hi,
> I am facing problem while installing 1.7beta1 release from source.
> It's throwing "RuntimeError: Failed to build media files" error .
>
> My easy-install.pth contains below things.
>
> import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path)
> ./python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg
> ./recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg
> ./pytz-2012d-py2.7.egg
> ./python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.egg
> ./paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.7.egg
> ./flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.7.egg
> ./Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg
> ./django_evolution-0.6.7-py2.7.egg
> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL
> ./mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg
> ./django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg
> ./Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg
> ./Jinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg
> ./RBTools-0.4.1-py2.7.egg
> ./requests-0.14.0-py2.7.egg
> ./Djblets-0.7.1-py2.7.egg
> /root/Desktop/rb_1.7
> ./nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg
> /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7
> import sys; new=sys.path[sys.__plen:]; del sys.path[sys.__plen:];
> p=getattr(sys,'__egginsert',0); sys.path[p:p]=new; sys.__egginsert =
> p+len(new)
>
> Please help me.
>
> Regards,
> KVR
>
>
> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board
>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but
>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>> 17-beta-1-released/
>>
>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so
>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would
>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality
>> release.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[kvr]

Hi,
I am facing problem while installing 1.7beta1 release from source.
It's throwing "RuntimeError: Failed to build media files" error .

My easy-install.pth contains below things.

import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path)
./python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg
./recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg
./pytz-2012d-py2.7.egg
./python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.egg
./paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.7.egg
./flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.7.egg
./Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg
./django_evolution-0.6.7-py2.7.egg
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL
./mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg
./django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg
./Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg
./Jinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg
./RBTools-0.4.1-py2.7.egg
./requests-0.14.0-py2.7.egg
./Djblets-0.7.1-py2.7.egg
/root/Desktop/rb_1.7
./nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7
import sys; new=sys.path[sys.__plen:]; del sys.path[sys.__plen:]; 
p=getattr(sys,'__egginsert',0); sys.path[p:p]=new; sys.__egginsert = 
p+len(new)

Please help me.

Regards,
KVR

On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Daniel Laird]

I checked permissions - it turned out that ext had permissions of 755 and 
infact needs 775 as the user is in group www-data but the www-data needs w 
access to ext.
Perhaps that could be added to the debug message to help other people who 
make the same mistake as me.

Cheers
Dan

On Friday, August 3, 2012 7:49:01 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> The CACHE_* warnings you get are harmless. Just new APIs in Django we have 
> to migrate to.
>
> We can't detect the config file location. The user may be using our 
> auto-generated ones, or they may have copied/pasted into their Apache 
> configuration. There's no way for us to know.
>
> So I wasn't completely sure, but did you create the ext directory and set 
> the ownership on it? Can you show me a ls -ld of that directory? That 
> should be the last thing you'd need to configure.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Laird <
> daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have tried to install this release.
>> I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by 
>> specifying -f to easy_install.
>> Onc done I then did 
>> rb-site upgrade /path/my/site
>>
>> This took a while and generated the following:
>> Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1
>> There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
>> Adding baseline version for new models
>> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
>> Installing custom SQL ...
>> Installing indexes ...
>> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>>
>> Evolution successful.
>> Resetting in-database caches.
>> Upgrade complete.
>>
>> The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images)
>> has changed. You will need to make manual changes to 
>> your web server configuration.
>>
>> For Apache, you will need to add:
>>
>> Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static"
>>
>> For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url:
>>
>> "/static" => "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static"
>>
>> Once you have made these changes, type the following 
>> to resolve this:
>>
>> $ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan 
>> resolve-check static-media
>>
>> I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias. 
>>  
>> However did that and then ran the command specified.
>>
>> I then restarted memcached and apache.
>> However I now get a splash screen that says:
>>
>> *Manual server updates required
>>> **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. 
>>> After these changes are made, you should restart your server.
>>> **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our 
>>> mailing list.*
>>
>>
>> But I have done this:
>> It also says:
>>
>> *Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This 
>>> directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files.
>>> **Your extensions media directory is currently at: 
>>> /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
>>> **Permission problems
>>> **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac, 
>>> you can fix this by typing:
>>> **$ sudo chown -R www-data 
>>> "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext"
>>> **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership 
>>> to www-data.*
>>
>>  
>> But I have also checked this.
>> Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further?
>> Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site 
>> commands:
>>
>>> */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:
>>>  
>>> DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES 
>>> instead.
>>> **  DeprecationWarning*
>>
>>
>> I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
>>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>>> 17-beta-1-released/
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
>>> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
>>> would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>>> higher-quality release.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>  -- 
>> Want 

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Christian Hammond]

On Aug 6, 2012, at 19:16, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
 
 
 
 Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
 nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
 no, apparently not.
 
 I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
 and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
 out.
 
 Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
>>> servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
>>> of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
>>> of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.
>>> 
>>> So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
>>> upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
>>> I can rev the version back up.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> One more problem :(
>> 
>> Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume
>> there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here.
>> 
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
>>ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
>> line 150, in call_command
>>return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
>> 232, in execute
>>output = self.handle(*args, **options)
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
>> 371, in handle
>>return self.handle_noargs(**options)
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
>>  line 163, in handle_noargs
>>collected = self.collect()
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
>>  line 119, in collect
>>dry_run=self.dry_run)
>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
>> in post_process
>>output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package)
>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
>> 106, in pack_javascripts
>>return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js,
>> js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs)
>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
>> 100, in pack
>>content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
>> line 65, in compress_js
>>js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js)
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py", 
>> line 10, in compress_js
>>from jsmin import jsmin
>> ImportError: No module named jsmin
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>  File "setup.py", line 182, in 
>>"Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
>>dist.run_commands()
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
>> run_commands
>>self.run_command(cmd)
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
>> run_command
>>cmd_obj.run()
>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
>> line 53, in run
>>return _install.run(self)
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 575, in
>> run
>>self.run_command(cmd_name)
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
>> run_command
>>cmd_obj.run()
>>  File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py", 
>> line 29, in run
>>self.run_command('egg_info')
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
>> run_command
>>cmd_obj.run()
>>  File "setup.py", line 63, in run
>>self.run_command('build_media')
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
>> run_command
>>cmd_obj.run()
>>  File "setup.py", line 81, in run
>>raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
>> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install)
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> *sigh* Okay, apparently django_pipeline has an undeclar

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
> > > nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
> > > no, apparently not.
> > > 
> > > I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
> > > and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
> > > out.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.
> > 
> > 
> > Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
> > servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
> > of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
> > of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.
> > 
> > So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
> > upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
> > I can rev the version back up.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> One more problem :(
> 
> Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume
> there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here.
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
> ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 150, in call_command
> return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
> 232, in execute
> output = self.handle(*args, **options)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
> 371, in handle
> return self.handle_noargs(**options)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
>  line 163, in handle_noargs
> collected = self.collect()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
>  line 119, in collect
> dry_run=self.dry_run)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
> in post_process
> output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
> 106, in pack_javascripts
> return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js,
> js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
> 100, in pack
> content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
> line 65, in compress_js
> js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py", 
> line 10, in compress_js
> from jsmin import jsmin
> ImportError: No module named jsmin
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "setup.py", line 182, in 
> "Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
> dist.run_commands()
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
> run_commands
> self.run_command(cmd)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
> line 53, in run
> return _install.run(self)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 575, in
> run
> self.run_command(cmd_name)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py", 
> line 29, in run
> self.run_command('egg_info')
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "setup.py", line 63, in run
> self.run_command('build_media')
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "setup.py", line 81, in run
> raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install)
> 
> 


*sigh* Okay, apparently django_pipeline has an undeclared runtime
dependency on http://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsmin/

Looks like I'll

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
> > nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
> > no, apparently not.
> > 
> > I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
> > and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
> > out.
> > 
> > Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.
> 
> 
> Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
> servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
> of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
> of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.
> 
> So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
> upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
> I can rev the version back up.
> 



One more problem :(

Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume
there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
in post_process
output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
106, in pack_javascripts
return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js,
js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
100, in pack
content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
line 65, in compress_js
js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py", line 
10, in compress_js
from jsmin import jsmin
ImportError: No module named jsmin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 182, in 
"Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py", line 
29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install)


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
> nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
> no, apparently not.
> 
> I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
> and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
> out.
> 
> Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.


Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.

So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
I can rev the version back up.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Christian Hammond]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:50 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > > Going further, if that change is reverted, the next failure seems to
> > > come from when they redid the compiler API. What's odd is that the
> > > code doesn't look like it should be an issue, but the bisects keep
> > > pointing to it. This is revision
> > > 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178.
> >
> > From further investigation, it looks like that patch was completely
> > broken until they added both c1ff4867fe57a9fffbddae38b51d888c85304a87
> > and fb51fba3f391a9685f4ab65757e7511e3f927df8 to fix it properly. So
> > we're probably getting a false-positive from git bisect because those
> > two patches are also not included. Maybe a quick 'git rebase -i' to
> > merge those into 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178 will allow git
> > bisect to find the real culprit?
> >
> > The only other thing I noticed was that they did change behavior in one
> > place in that code. In Compiler.compile(), they were previously passing
> > "output_path" to the compilers as the output argument, but this patch
> > changes that to be "output_file" as determined by finders.find(). Being
> > unfamiliar with the code and the return type of finders.find(), I can't
> > say whether this is relevant.
> >
>
> Thanks very much for your help on this Christian, but at this point
> (with my deadline running close and the hour growing late), I'm just
> going to go the downgrade route and treat this as a life-lesson: always
> test version compatibility before making a release.
>
> Thanks again, and if we find a solution for this later on, I can still
> upgrade django_pipeline back up to a recent release. I'll just be
> carrying the annoying "epoch" version-mangle forever. C'est la vie.
>
>
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly
builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no,
apparently not.

I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has
helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out.

Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:50 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > Going further, if that change is reverted, the next failure seems to
> > come from when they redid the compiler API. What's odd is that the
> > code doesn't look like it should be an issue, but the bisects keep
> > pointing to it. This is revision
> > 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178.
> 
> From further investigation, it looks like that patch was completely
> broken until they added both c1ff4867fe57a9fffbddae38b51d888c85304a87
> and fb51fba3f391a9685f4ab65757e7511e3f927df8 to fix it properly. So
> we're probably getting a false-positive from git bisect because those
> two patches are also not included. Maybe a quick 'git rebase -i' to
> merge those into 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178 will allow git
> bisect to find the real culprit?
> 
> The only other thing I noticed was that they did change behavior in one
> place in that code. In Compiler.compile(), they were previously passing
> "output_path" to the compilers as the output argument, but this patch
> changes that to be "output_file" as determined by finders.find(). Being
> unfamiliar with the code and the return type of finders.find(), I can't
> say whether this is relevant.
> 

Thanks very much for your help on this Christian, but at this point
(with my deadline running close and the hour growing late), I'm just
going to go the downgrade route and treat this as a life-lesson: always
test version compatibility before making a release.

Thanks again, and if we find a solution for this later on, I can still
upgrade django_pipeline back up to a recent release. I'll just be
carrying the annoying "epoch" version-mangle forever. C'est la vie.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Going further, if that change is reverted, the next failure seems to
> come from when they redid the compiler API. What's odd is that the
> code doesn't look like it should be an issue, but the bisects keep
> pointing to it. This is revision
> 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178.

>From further investigation, it looks like that patch was completely
broken until they added both c1ff4867fe57a9fffbddae38b51d888c85304a87
and fb51fba3f391a9685f4ab65757e7511e3f927df8 to fix it properly. So
we're probably getting a false-positive from git bisect because those
two patches are also not included. Maybe a quick 'git rebase -i' to
merge those into 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178 will allow git
bisect to find the real culprit?

The only other thing I noticed was that they did change behavior in one
place in that code. In Compiler.compile(), they were previously passing
"output_path" to the compilers as the output argument, but this patch
changes that to be "output_file" as determined by finders.find(). Being
unfamiliar with the code and the return type of finders.find(), I can't
say whether this is relevant.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Christian Hammond]

Going further, if that change is reverted, the next failure seems to come
from when they redid the compiler API. What's odd is that the code doesn't
look like it should be an issue, but the bisects keep pointing to it. This
is revision 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178.

I'm not seeing issues with files actually being compiled. Rather, I'm
seeing it for collected images:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/management/base.py",
line 232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/management/base.py",
line 371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
line 120, in collect
for original_path, processed_path, processed in processor:
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
line 226, in post_process
content = pattern.sub(converter, content)
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
line 167, in converter
hashed_url = self.url(unquote(joined_result), force=True)
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
line 114, in url
hashed_name = self.hashed_name(clean_name).replace('\\', '/')
  File
"/home/chipx86/buildroots/rb-master/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
line 74, in hashed_name
(clean_name, self))
ValueError: The file 'static/djblets/images/datagrid/header_bg.png' could
not be found with .

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:54 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > This branch has what we need on the djblets side:
> >
> > https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix
> >
> > Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems
> > with pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced
> > the first occurrence to revision
> > dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even if I revert that on
> > master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm?
> >
>
> I get the following traceback with your bless patch (as expected):
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
> ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 150, in call_command
> return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
> 232, in execute
> output = self.handle(*args, **options)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
> 371, in handle
> return self.handle_noargs(**options)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
> line 163, in handle_noargs
> collected = self.collect()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
> line 119, in collect
> dry_run=self.dry_run)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
> in post_process
> packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 90,
> in pack_stylesheets
> variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
> 100, in pack
> content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
> line 72, in compress_css
> css = self.concatenate_and_rewrite(paths, output_filename, variant)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
> line 135, in concatenate_and_rewrite
> content = self.read_file(path)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-pa

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:54 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> This branch has what we need on the djblets side:
> 
> https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix
> 
> Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems
> with pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced
> the first occurrence to revision
> dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even if I revert that on
> master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm?
> 

I get the following traceback with your bless patch (as expected):

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
in post_process
packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 90,
in pack_stylesheets
variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line
100, in pack
content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
line 72, in compress_css
css = self.concatenate_and_rewrite(paths, output_filename, variant)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
line 135, in concatenate_and_rewrite
content = self.read_file(path)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py",
line 208, in read_file
file = default_storage.open(path, 'rb')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py",
line 33, in open
return self._open(name, mode)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 114,
in _open
storage = self.find_storage(name)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 111,
in find_storage
raise ValueError("The file '%s' could not be found with %r." %
(name, self))
ValueError: The file 'rb/css/diffviewer.css' could not be found with
.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 182, in 
"Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py", line 
29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pmGIf8 (%install)



Looking at the pipeline commit you referenced, I can understand why it's
still having issue. That patch is just an exception-catcher for an
underlying issue that they must have introduced earlier. I'm going to
see if I can spot an earlier patch that may have introduced the issue
with writing to a static root (unless that's an assumption that Review
Board is making that it should not be).





-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Christian Hammond]

This branch has what we need on the djblets side:

https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix

Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems with
pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced the first
occurrence to revision dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even
if I revert that on master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:33 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a
> > bit, breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing
> > that, I'm getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it
> > down and see if we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in
> > pipeline.
> >
> > Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in
> > pipeline for the package.
> >
> > I'll keep you informed as I learn more.
>
> Thanks, I appreciate it. I'm attacking it on my end as well. Do you have
> a github with your in-progress changes I could sync to, so we don't
> duplicate effort?
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:33 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a
> bit, breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing
> that, I'm getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it
> down and see if we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in
> pipeline.
> 
> Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in
> pipeline for the package.
> 
> I'll keep you informed as I learn more.

Thanks, I appreciate it. I'm attacking it on my end as well. Do you have
a github with your in-progress changes I could sync to, so we don't
duplicate effort?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Christian Hammond]

I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a bit,
breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing that, I'm
getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it down and see if
we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in pipeline.

Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in pipeline
for the package.

I'll keep you informed as I learn more.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I
> > know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that
> > for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly
> > issue I'm not completely sure about yet.
>
> Ugh, unfortunately not. It's a real pain to revert a version in Fedora.
> (It can be done, such as when regressions necessitate it), but it's
> never done lightly. It requires mangling the version numbers in a
> particularly ugly way to ensure that anyone who happened to install the
> previous package will still update to the new one (despite the version
> being lower).
>
> I don't suppose you could point me at specific patches that I could
> revert in the django_pipeline 1.2.14 release instead that would get it
> working in the meantime?
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I
> know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that
> for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly
> issue I'm not completely sure about yet.

Ugh, unfortunately not. It's a real pain to revert a version in Fedora.
(It can be done, such as when regressions necessitate it), but it's
never done lightly. It requires mangling the version numbers in a
particularly ugly way to ensure that anyone who happened to install the
previous package will still update to the new one (despite the version
being lower).

I don't suppose you could point me at specific patches that I could
revert in the django_pipeline 1.2.14 release instead that would get it
working in the meantime?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Christian Hammond]

There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know
for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now?
Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not
completely sure about yet.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > > Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out
> of the dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
> > >
> > > I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully
> necessary on fedora once you have a package for it?
> >
> > Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it
> > doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet.
> >
> > Ah well, one step at a time.
> >
>
> Ok, finally got django_pipeline accepted into Fedora today.
> Unfortunately, now I'm having a compilation problem with ReviewBoard:
>
> Note: TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument
> 'outdated'
>
> This is with the ReviewBoard 1.7beta1 tarball and django_pipeline
> 1.2.14.
>
> Any help would be appreciated. I need to get this in today to make the
> Fedora 18 deadline :(
>
>
> Full traceback:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
> ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 150, in call_command
> return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
> 232, in execute
> output = self.handle(*args, **options)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
> 371, in handle
> return self.handle_noargs(**options)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
> line 163, in handle_noargs
> collected = self.collect()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
> line 119, in collect
> dry_run=self.dry_run)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
> in post_process
> packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 90,
> in pack_stylesheets
> variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 99,
> in pack
> paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 93,
> in compile
> return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py", line
> 41, in compile
> compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated,
> force=force)
> TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated'
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "setup.py", line 182, in 
> "Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
> dist.run_commands()
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
> run_commands
> self.run_command(cmd)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
> line 53, in run
> return _install.run(self)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 575, in
> run
> self.run_command(cmd_name)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py",
> line 29, in run
> self.run_command('egg_info')
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "setup.py", line 63, in run
> self.run_command('build_media')
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "setup.py", line 81, in run
> raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dvLLKA (%install)
>
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.

URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the 
> > dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
> > 
> > I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary 
> > on fedora once you have a package for it?
> 
> Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it
> doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet.
> 
> Ah well, one step at a time.
> 

Ok, finally got django_pipeline accepted into Fedora today.
Unfortunately, now I'm having a compilation problem with ReviewBoard:

Note: TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument
'outdated'

This is with the ReviewBoard 1.7beta1 tarball and django_pipeline
1.2.14.

Any help would be appreciated. I need to get this in today to make the
Fedora 18 deadline :(


Full traceback:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py", line 30,
in post_process
packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 90,
in pack_stylesheets
variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 99,
in pack
paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py", line 93,
in compile
return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py", line
41, in compile
compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated,
force=force)
TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 182, in 
"Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py", line 
29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dvLLKA (%install)


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the 
> dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
> 
> I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on 
> fedora once you have a package for it?

Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it
doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet.

Ah well, one step at a time.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the 
dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).

I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on 
fedora once you have a package for it?

Christian



On Aug 3, 2012, at 12:17, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:46 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> A 0.7.1 is being uploaded right now that should fix this.
>> 
> 
> What is pipeline.storage, and is it a new dependency I need to have in
> on the build system?
> 
> Still getting:
> 
> + /usr/bin/python setup.py install
> --root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7.1-1.fc18.x86_64
> running install
> running build
> running build_py
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 18, in 
>ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 134, in call_command
>klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 70, in load_command_class
>return module.Command()
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
>  line 57, in __init__
>self.storage.path('')
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py",
> line 184, in inner
>self._setup()
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py", 
> line 279, in _setup
>self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py",
> line 277, in get_storage_class
>raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: "%s"'
> % (module, e))
> django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
> module pipeline.storage: "No module named pipeline.storage"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "setup.py", line 123, in 
>"Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules",
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
>dist.run_commands()
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
> run_commands
>self.run_command(cmd)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
>cmd_obj.run()
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
> line 53, in run
>return _install.run(self)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 563, in
> run
>self.run_command('build')
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
>cmd_obj.run()
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py", line 127, in
> run
>self.run_command(cmd_name)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
>cmd_obj.run()
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 92, in run
>self.build_package_data()
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 147, in build_package_data
>for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 104, in __getattr__
>self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 115, in _get_data_files
>self.analyze_manifest()
>  File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 167, in analyze_manifest
>self.run_command('egg_info')
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
>cmd_obj.run()
>  File "setup.py", line 47, in run
>self.run_command('build_media')
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>self.distribution.run_command(command)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
>cmd_obj.run()
>  File "setup.py", line 65, in run
>raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
> 
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:46 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> A 0.7.1 is being uploaded right now that should fix this.
> 

What is pipeline.storage, and is it a new dependency I need to have in
on the build system?

Still getting:

+ /usr/bin/python setup.py install
--root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7.1-1.fc18.x86_64
running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 18, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 134, in call_command
klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 70, in load_command_class
return module.Command()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 57, in __init__
self.storage.path('')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py",
line 184, in inner
self._setup()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py", line 
279, in _setup
self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py",
line 277, in get_storage_class
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: "%s"'
% (module, e))
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
module pipeline.storage: "No module named pipeline.storage"
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 123, in 
"Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules",
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 563, in
run
self.run_command('build')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py", line 127, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
92, in run
self.build_package_data()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
147, in build_package_data
for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
104, in __getattr__
self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
115, in _get_data_files
self.analyze_manifest()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
167, in analyze_manifest
self.run_command('egg_info')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 47, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 65, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

Hi Daniel,

The CACHE_* warnings you get are harmless. Just new APIs in Django we have
to migrate to.

We can't detect the config file location. The user may be using our
auto-generated ones, or they may have copied/pasted into their Apache
configuration. There's no way for us to know.

So I wasn't completely sure, but did you create the ext directory and set
the ownership on it? Can you show me a ls -ld of that directory? That
should be the last thing you'd need to configure.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Laird
wrote:

> I have tried to install this release.
> I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by
> specifying -f to easy_install.
> Onc done I then did
> rb-site upgrade /path/my/site
>
> This took a while and generated the following:
> Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1
> There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
> Adding baseline version for new models
> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
> Installing custom SQL ...
> Installing indexes ...
> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>
> Evolution successful.
> Resetting in-database caches.
> Upgrade complete.
>
> The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images)
> has changed. You will need to make manual changes to
> your web server configuration.
>
> For Apache, you will need to add:
>
> Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static"
>
> For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url:
>
> "/static" => "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static"
>
> Once you have made these changes, type the following
> to resolve this:
>
> $ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan
> resolve-check static-media
>
> I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias.
> However did that and then ran the command specified.
>
> I then restarted memcached and apache.
> However I now get a splash screen that says:
>
> *Manual server updates required
>> **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server.
>> After these changes are made, you should restart your server.
>> **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our
>> mailing list.*
>
>
> But I have done this:
> It also says:
>
> *Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This
>> directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files.
>> **Your extensions media directory is currently at:
>> /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
>> **Permission problems
>> **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac,
>> you can fix this by typing:
>> **$ sudo chown -R www-data
>> "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext"
>> **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership to
>> www-data.*
>
>
> But I have also checked this.
> Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further?
> Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site commands:
>
>> */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:
>> DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES
>> instead.
>> **  DeprecationWarning*
>
>
> I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server.
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
> On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board
>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but
>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>> 17-beta-1-released/
>>
>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so
>> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would
>> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality
>> release.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

A 0.7.1 is being uploaded right now that should fix this.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 01:49 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review
> > Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this
> > release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news
> > post.
> >
> >
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
> >
> > Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta,
> > so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any
> > testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure
> > a higher-quality release.
>
>
> The tarball for Djblets 0.7 is missing the contrib directory, so I
> cannot generate the media files from it. Could you please re-release it?
>
> /usr/bin/python setup.py install
> --root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7-1.fc18.x86_64
> running install
> running build
> running build_py
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> error: No such file or directory
>
>
>
>
> Just copying the contrib directory from git in does not seem to work
> either, I get the following when running 'python setup.py install'
>
> running install
> running build
> running build_py
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 18, in 
> ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 134, in call_command
> klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
> line 70, in load_command_class
> return module.Command()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
> line 57, in __init__
> self.storage.path('')
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py",
> line 184, in inner
> self._setup()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
> line 279, in _setup
> self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py",
> line 277, in get_storage_class
> raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: "%s"'
> % (module, e))
> django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
> module pipeline.storage: "No module named pipeline.storage"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "setup.py", line 123, in 
> "Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules",
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
> dist.run_commands()
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
> run_commands
> self.run_command(cmd)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
> line 53, in run
> return _install.run(self)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 563, in
> run
> self.run_command('build')
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py", line 127, in
> run
> self.run_command(cmd_name)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 92, in run
> self.build_package_data()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 147, in build_package_data
> for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 104, in __getattr__
> self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 115, in _get_data_files
> self.analyze_manifest()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
> 167, in analyze_manifest
> self.run_command('egg_info')
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
> run_command
> cmd_obj.

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Daniel Laird]

I have tried to install this release.
I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by 
specifying -f to easy_install.
Onc done I then did 
rb-site upgrade /path/my/site

This took a while and generated the following:
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1
There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
Adding baseline version for new models
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)

Evolution successful.
Resetting in-database caches.
Upgrade complete.

The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images)
has changed. You will need to make manual changes to 
your web server configuration.

For Apache, you will need to add:

Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static"

For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url:

"/static" => "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static"

Once you have made these changes, type the following 
to resolve this:

$ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan resolve-check 
static-media

I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias.  
However did that and then ran the command specified.

I then restarted memcached and apache.
However I now get a splash screen that says:

*Manual server updates required
> **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. 
> After these changes are made, you should restart your server.
> **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
> list.*


But I have done this:
It also says:

*Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This 
> directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files.
> **Your extensions media directory is currently at: 
> /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
> **Permission problems
> **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac, 
> you can fix this by typing:
> **$ sudo chown -R www-data 
> "/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext"
> **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership to 
> www-data.*

 
But I have also checked this.
Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further?
Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site commands:

> */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:
>  
> DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES 
> instead.
> **  DeprecationWarning*


I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server.

Cheers
Dan

On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 01:49 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> 
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review
> Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this
> release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news
> post.
> 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
> 
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta,
> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any
> testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure
> a higher-quality release.


The tarball for Djblets 0.7 is missing the contrib directory, so I
cannot generate the media files from it. Could you please re-release it?

/usr/bin/python setup.py install
--root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7-1.fc18.x86_64
running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
error: No such file or directory




Just copying the contrib directory from git in does not seem to work
either, I get the following when running 'python setup.py install'

running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 18, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 134, in call_command
klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 70, in load_command_class
return module.Command()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 line 57, in __init__
self.storage.path('')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py",
line 184, in inner
self._setup()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py", line 
279, in _setup
self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py",
line 277, in get_storage_class
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: "%s"'
% (module, e))
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
module pipeline.storage: "No module named pipeline.storage"
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 123, in 
"Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules",
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py",
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py", line 563, in
run
self.run_command('build')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py", line 127, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
92, in run
self.build_package_data()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
147, in build_package_data
for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
104, in __getattr__
self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
115, in _get_data_files
self.analyze_manifest()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py", line
167, in analyze_manifest
self.run_command('egg_info')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 47, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 65, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://ww

Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

[Christian Hammond]

Hey everyone,

I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7
beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather
than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.

http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/

Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so
use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would
definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality
release.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en