Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Kai Krueger

Serge Wroclawski-2 wrote:
> 
> How does authentication work on the API level with OpenID?
> 
Preferably through OAuth, but the account can/should still have a password
associated just like before in case you need basic auth in the API


--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/User-diary-enhancements-subscriptions-Facebook-Twitter-integration-tp6340003p6340521.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Kai Krueger  wrote:


> For example, if you hit the edit button without having an account, you get
> redirected to the login page. If you then hit e.g. the gmail button you will
> automatically get to the create account page with some of the details
> already pre-filled in (coming from the OpenID provider) You then only have
> to confirm the account creation and the CT. Once done, you are logged in and
> automatically referred back to Potlatch for editing.

How does authentication work on the API level with OpenID?

- Serge

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Kai Krueger

Frederik Ramm wrote:
> 
> Also, don't misunderstand how the OpenID login works - you will still 
> have to create an account with OSM, it's only that your everyday login 
> will be simplified. So anyone for whom the signup is an insurmountable 
> hurdle will not join - whether we support OpenID or not.
> 

You do still need to create an account, but OpenID does hopefully make that
step easier too.

For example, if you hit the edit button without having an account, you get
redirected to the login page. If you then hit e.g. the gmail button you will
automatically get to the create account page with some of the details
already pre-filled in (coming from the OpenID provider) You then only have
to confirm the account creation and the CT. Once done, you are logged in and
automatically referred back to Potlatch for editing.

If you are using an OpenID provider that returns an email address we can
trust (e.g. gmail), you also no longer need to confirm your email address.

So you should be able to start editing from not having an account within 4
or 5 clicks. (I haven't checked to verify the exact number)

Not entirely seamlessly, but hopefully easier than the current workflow of
creating an account.

Kai


--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/User-diary-enhancements-subscriptions-Facebook-Twitter-integration-tp6340003p6340438.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Frederik Ramm

Hi,

Mike N wrote:

Facebook is imho less likely, as as far as I know, it uses a proprietary
protocol and so I would be less enthused to support that.


It depends on the type of mapper we're trying to attract.  Using the 
Facebook login will be the simplest possible way to get started for many 
people.


I agree with Kai that supporting proprietary data-gathering platforms 
like Facebook would be very low on my list, or maybe even actively 
opposed by me.


Also, don't misunderstand how the OpenID login works - you will still 
have to create an account with OSM, it's only that your everyday login 
will be simplified. So anyone for whom the signup is an insurmountable 
hurdle will not join - whether we support OpenID or not.


Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Mike N

On 5/7/2011 10:26 AM, Kai Krueger wrote:

Facebook is imho less likely, as as far as I know, it uses a proprietary
protocol and so I would be less enthused to support that.


It depends on the type of mapper we're trying to attract.  Using the 
Facebook login will be the simplest possible way to get started for many 
people.


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Kai Krueger

Frederik Ramm wrote:
> 
> Well I'd say that OpenID is enough. And there's an OpenID branch of the 
> Rails Port that already goes so some length supporting that.
> 
Yes, there is a fully functional OpenID implementation.
http://openid.dev.openstreetmap.org/

However, it currently doesn't seem to have the political support necessary
to get it merged. But perhaps if enough people express their interest this
might change.

It currently only supports OpenID, so it doesn't work with Twitter or
Facebook, as they have implemented their own login protocol, however it does
work with things like gmail and yahoo mail and any other provider supporting
OpenID, which is quite a number.

It would be possible to support login via twitter as well, should the OpenID
branch ever get deployed, as it uses an authentication based on OAuth, which
shouldn't be too difficult to implement.

Facebook is imho less likely, as as far as I know, it uses a proprietary
protocol and so I would be less enthused to support that.

Kai


--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/User-diary-enhancements-subscriptions-Facebook-Twitter-integration-tp6340003p6340182.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi,

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Frederik Ramm  wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Josh Doe wrote:
>
>> That got me wondering about adding the possibility to share posts with
>> Facebook/Twitter/etc, and then even allowing login to OSM with
>> Facebook/OpenID, and who knows what else.
>>
>
> Well I'd say that OpenID is enough. And there's an OpenID branch of the
> Rails Port that already goes so some length supporting that.
>
>
>  I know we need to be careful
>> about not trying to implement a full blown blogging platform, but I
>> think it's important to have some of these features.
>>
>
> We might also go in the other direction, acknowledge that we're not a
> blogging platform, and try for better integration with sites that are... new
> users already seem to be quite confused by the multitude of options to
> express oneself in OSM.
>
>
There's already blogs.openstreetmap.org that aggregates OSM-related
blogging. I have posted only a few diary entries over the years, and to me
the diary system does not make a lot of sense unless there's tighter
integration with changesets or the map, but then again, I haven't done a
thing to improve the diary system myself, so what am I even talking about.

-- 
Martijn van Exel
http://about.me/mvexel
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Frederik Ramm

Hi,

Josh Doe wrote:

That got me wondering about adding the possibility to share posts with
Facebook/Twitter/etc, and then even allowing login to OSM with
Facebook/OpenID, and who knows what else.


Well I'd say that OpenID is enough. And there's an OpenID branch of the 
Rails Port that already goes so some length supporting that.



I know we need to be careful
about not trying to implement a full blown blogging platform, but I
think it's important to have some of these features.


We might also go in the other direction, acknowledge that we're not a 
blogging platform, and try for better integration with sites that are... 
new users already seem to be quite confused by the multitude of options 
to express oneself in OSM.


Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread David Earl

On 07/05/2011 13:05, Josh Doe wrote:

That got me wondering about adding the possibility to share posts with
Facebook/Twitter/etc,


You can already get them on twitter by following @osmblogs

David




___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Josh Doe  wrote:
> Has there been any discussion of enhancing the user diary system? I
> couldn't find any discussions on the wiki or lists, but please point
> me to them if they exist.

Yes, there has. In a number of ways, and different people have different ideas.

> My number one suggestion is that we allow users to subscribe to
> certain diary posts. I'll comment on an entry, and then someone will
> follow up, but I'll have no idea unless I remember to go back and
> check.

If you feel strongly about it, code it up, demonstrate it and submit
it as a patch.

> I don't know anything about Ruby or Rails, but maybe someday I could
> take a stab at it myself, or maybe someone here has the interest and
> skills.

The way things get done in the project is by demonstrating them.
Discussions take weeks/months/years but if you can show demonstratable
code, there's a much higher likelyhood of it being accepted into the
mainstream code base.

The rails port is in git (so it's easy to fork and get started), and
has a dev environment with sample data so you can jump right in.

- Serge

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] User diary enhancements, subscriptions, Facebook/Twitter integration

2011-05-07 Thread Josh Doe
Has there been any discussion of enhancing the user diary system? I
couldn't find any discussions on the wiki or lists, but please point
me to them if they exist.

My number one suggestion is that we allow users to subscribe to
certain diary posts. I'll comment on an entry, and then someone will
follow up, but I'll have no idea unless I remember to go back and
check.

That got me wondering about adding the possibility to share posts with
Facebook/Twitter/etc, and then even allowing login to OSM with
Facebook/OpenID, and who knows what else. I know we need to be careful
about not trying to implement a full blown blogging platform, but I
think it's important to have some of these features.

I don't know anything about Ruby or Rails, but maybe someday I could
take a stab at it myself, or maybe someone here has the interest and
skills.

Regards,
-Josh

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Skip geographical (redundant) address tags

2011-05-07 Thread Maarten Deen

Lennard wrote:
> On 6-5-2011 20:44, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
>
>> I could not really help you (i don't know your region, but  as i can see
>> (using JOSM) there is no admin relation in this area, so few clues to
>> help nomatim to find location.
>
> The entire Netherlands is covered by admin relations. Of course,
> occasionally, these get broken. Also, not every admin_level=10 is there
> yet. Up to z8 is complete, barring broken data.
>
> The municipality is here:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/188858
>
> However, we don't have an admin_level=10 relation for the town called
> Helden, on account of the municipality not giving us their boundaries
> yet. There's another mapper tracing these from official documents (less
> accurate than receiving the original geo data, but alas), but he doesn't
> seem to have done this yet.

I have added admin_level=10 with data from 6pp and own knowledge. It's probably 
a bit crude compared with original sources but I think it is correct.


It still does not explain the zipcode though.

Regards,
Maarten

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk