Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Simon Hewison wrote: > It is because your renderer is removing "superflous" words like "(closed)" > ? > Yes, that's what's going on. We've made this decision because in most cases, text inside parentheses is either a translation, which we handle separately, or not actually part of the name, as in this case. Our render used to respect the disused tag, but this feature got lost in some reshuffling. We have updates in the works that will re-add it make cases like this more clear, but still avoid the extra data tacked onto the label. -- AJ Ashton ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:22:50PM -0400, AJ Ashton wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Simon Hewison wrote: > > > Okay, so it's mapbox, any idea how often they update their data? It seems > > the data is over 12 months old. Not the best way to showcase how quick > > it is to update the maps they are rending. > > > We update every 5 minutes or so*, what makes you say this is over 12 months > old? > > *Except for coastlines, admin boundaries, and admin labels. Then why does way 164845193 (Old Street Magistrates Court (closed)) have an old label? It is because your renderer is removing "superflous" words like "(closed)" ? -- Simon Hewison ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
MapBox Streets is updated every few minutes. I've seen it in action :) On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Simon Hewison wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 06:31:18PM +0200, sabas88 wrote: > > The rendering is Mapbox Streets (no way to link, but some panning and > > zooming here http://www.mapbox.com/tour/) > > Okay, so it's mapbox, any idea how often they update their data? It seems > the data is over 12 months old. Not the best way to showcase how quick > it is to update the maps they are rending. > > -- > Simon Hewison > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Simon Hewison wrote: > Okay, so it's mapbox, any idea how often they update their data? It seems > the data is over 12 months old. Not the best way to showcase how quick > it is to update the maps they are rending. We update every 5 minutes or so*, what makes you say this is over 12 months old? *Except for coastlines, admin boundaries, and admin labels. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 06:31:18PM +0200, sabas88 wrote: > The rendering is Mapbox Streets (no way to link, but some panning and > zooming here http://www.mapbox.com/tour/) Okay, so it's mapbox, any idea how often they update their data? It seems the data is over 12 months old. Not the best way to showcase how quick it is to update the maps they are rending. -- Simon Hewison ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
It looks more like Mapbox Streets rendering. Here's a quick screenshot of Mapbox Streets at zoom level 17 for comparison: http://cl.ly/image/0H0w2Q1S3b3T -- Tom Morris http://tommorris.org/ On 22 July 2013 at 17:05:46, Simon Hewison (si...@zymurgy.org) wrote: In today's Metro free tabloid newspaper in London, there's sponsored article (promoting Expedia), which extolls the virtues of the Shoreditch area of London. Fair enough, they want a map, so they've taken Openstreetmap data, tweaked the rendering to abbreviate street names (Old Street becomes Old St), tweaked the styling, but it looks very much like Mapnik, and an old copy of Openstreetmap data, based on the building outlines (I know, I mapped some of the buildings there). Oh, and they've not attributed Openstreetmap as the map data source. http://www.zymurgy.org/~simon/metro_osm_no_attribution.jpg vs http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.52694&lon=-0.08141&zoom=17&layers=M Print copy is Metro newspaper, page 33, Monday 22 July 2013. -- Simon Hewison ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
2013/7/22 Simon Hewison > In today's Metro free tabloid newspaper in London, there's sponsored > article > (promoting Expedia), which extolls the virtues of the Shoreditch area of > London. Fair enough, they want a map, so they've taken Openstreetmap data, > tweaked the rendering to abbreviate street names (Old Street becomes Old > St), > tweaked the styling, but it looks very much like Mapnik, and an old copy > of Openstreetmap data, based on the building outlines (I know, I mapped > some > of the buildings there). > Oh, and they've not attributed Openstreetmap as the map data source. > > http://www.zymurgy.org/~simon/metro_osm_no_attribution.jpg > vs > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.52694&lon=-0.08141&zoom=17&layers=M > > The rendering is Mapbox Streets (no way to link, but some panning and zooming here http://www.mapbox.com/tour/) > Print copy is Metro newspaper, page 33, Monday 22 July 2013. > > -- > Simon Hewison > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Another OSM use without attribution (unusual rendering)
In today's Metro free tabloid newspaper in London, there's sponsored article (promoting Expedia), which extolls the virtues of the Shoreditch area of London. Fair enough, they want a map, so they've taken Openstreetmap data, tweaked the rendering to abbreviate street names (Old Street becomes Old St), tweaked the styling, but it looks very much like Mapnik, and an old copy of Openstreetmap data, based on the building outlines (I know, I mapped some of the buildings there). Oh, and they've not attributed Openstreetmap as the map data source. http://www.zymurgy.org/~simon/metro_osm_no_attribution.jpg vs http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.52694&lon=-0.08141&zoom=17&layers=M Print copy is Metro newspaper, page 33, Monday 22 July 2013. -- Simon Hewison ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
