Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-06-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 345  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
 157  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
  85  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4234/stunnel-4.55-1.fc17
  80  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4501/libxslt-1.1.28-1.fc17
  77  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4581/libuser-0.57.6-2.fc17
  23  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8953/openjpeg-1.4-15.fc17
  10  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10128/ssmtp-2.61-20.fc17
  10  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10121/subversion-1.7.10-1.fc17
   9  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10233/php-5.4.16-1.fc17
   7  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10415/perl-Module-Signature-0.73-1.fc17
   2  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10830/fail2ban-0.8.10-1.fc17
   2  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9123/kernel-3.9.5-101.fc17
   0  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10929/xen-4.1.5-6.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10940/tomcat6-6.0.37-1.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10980/clamav-0.97.8-2.fc17


The following Fedora 17 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
 297  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12509/PackageKit-0.7.6-1.fc17
 105  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3304/libvpx-1.2.0-1.fc17
  10  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10172/gnome-bluetooth-3.4.2-2.fc17
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10602/dnsmasq-2.65-6.fc17


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 17 updates-testing

cabal-rpm-0.8.1-1.fc17
clamav-0.97.8-2.fc17
drupal7-features-2.0-0.4.rc1.fc17
easy-rsa-2.2.0-2.fc17
golang-1.1.1-1.fc17
guacamole-0.8.1-1.fc17
hotot-0.9.9-6.20130614gited2ff01.fc17
ibus-typing-booster-1.0.1-1.fc17
ibus-typing-booster-1.0.2-1.fc17
jemalloc-3.4.0-1.fc17
libguac-client-ssh-0.8.0-2.fc17
mlpack-1.0.6-1.fc17
nomacs-1.2.0-1.fc17
nordugrid-arc-3.0.2-1.fc17
nordugrid-arc-doc-1.3.2-1.fc17
perl-Net-Twitter-4.6-1.fc17
perl-qpid-0.22-1.fc17
php-xcache-3.0.2-1.fc17
pidgin-sipe-1.16.0-1.fc17
python-cliapp-1.20130613-1.fc17
python-martian-0.14-1.fc17
qpid-cpp-0.22-1.fc17
scotch-6.0.0-1.fc17
tomcat6-6.0.37-1.fc17
xen-4.1.5-6.fc17

Details about builds:



 cabal-rpm-0.8.1-1.fc17 (FEDORA-2013-10960)
 RPM package creator for Haskell Cabal-based packages

Update Information:

- follow new updated Fedora Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- no longer truncate long summary
- word wrapping of descriptions
- use generic description for shared subpackage


ChangeLog:

* Fri Jun 14 2013 Jens Petersen  - 0.8.1-1
- word wrapping of descriptions
- use generic description for shared subpackage
- simplify logic for summary and description processing
* Fri May 31 2013 Jens Petersen  - 0.8.0-1
- use simplified Fedora Haskell Packaging macros approved by
  Fedora Packaging Committee (https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/194)
* Wed Apr  3 2013 Jens Petersen  - 0.7.1-2
- better require cabal-install




 clamav-0.97.8-2.fc17 (FEDORA-2013-10980)
 End-user tools for the Clam Antivirus scanner

Update Information:

Fix 963920
Update to 0.97.8

ChangeLog:

* Thu May  2 2013 Nick Bebout  - 0.97.8-1
- Update to 0.97.8
* Wed Apr 10 2013 Jon Ciesla  - 0.97.7-2
- Migrate from fedora-usermgmt to guideline scriptlets.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #956176 - CVE-2013-2020 CVE-2013-2021 clamav: Multiple potential 
security issues fixed in upstream 0.97.8 version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956176




 drupal7-features-2.0-0.4.rc1.fc17 (FEDORA-2013-10984)
 Provides feature management for Drupal

Update Information:

- Update to upstream 2.0-rc1 release for bug fixes
- Upstream changelog for this release is avai

Re: Unable to graphically EFI boot Fedora in vbox

2013-06-15 Thread Andre Robatino
I downloaded and tested Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-TC3-1.iso and it does
not come up graphically for me either - see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742695#c19 . Can you verify that
that is what you see as well? And could you try it with an install image?
(Fedora-19-TC3-x86_64-netinst.iso works for me.)



-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Unable to keep Input Method running

2013-06-15 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R

What does this mean?  This is F19 from TC3 running on omen.com.

--
 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX   c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
  Omen Technology Inc  "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:36:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There are settings for rotating / pruning the logs
> in /etc/systemd/journald.conf , but they don't seem to work terribly
> well when you have huge single files. A manual discard command might be
> nice, but what I was thinking of RFE'ing was some kind of rate limiting,
> especially for identical messages. I'm not sure anyone really _needs_
> the same AVC printed into their logs every three seconds; just a note
> that a given AVC had occurred 1000 times in the last hour or whatever
> would be sufficient.

There *is* rate limiting, but maybe it needs more fine-tuning.

RateLimitInterval=, RateLimitBurst=

Configures the rate limiting that is applied to all messages generated
on the system. If in the time interval defined by RateLimitInterval=
more messages than specified in RateLimitBurst= are logged by a service
all further messages within the interval are dropped, until the interval
is over. A message about the number of dropped messages is generated.
This rate limiting is applied per-service, so that two services which
log do not interfere with each other's limits. Defaults to 200 messages
in 10s. The time specification for RateLimitInterval= may be specified
in the following units: s, min, h, ms, us. To turn off any kind of rate
limiting, set either value to 0.


I've often had the _opposite_ problem, where some program spitting out
tracebacks or other verbose information gets cut off.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 16:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:43:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend
> > pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those
> > SELinux messages - if your system logs aren't that important to you, you
> > can safely just blow away the larger (over 10MB) files
> > in /var/log/journal and that should trim the journal down to a
> > reasonable size.
> 
> It would be handy if there were a journalctl command to force discard logs
> from before a certain time or down to a certain size. I tried to look for an
> existing RFE for this but couldn't find one, so I filed this:

There are settings for rotating / pruning the logs
in /etc/systemd/journald.conf , but they don't seem to work terribly
well when you have huge single files. A manual discard command might be
nice, but what I was thinking of RFE'ing was some kind of rate limiting,
especially for identical messages. I'm not sure anyone really _needs_
the same AVC printed into their logs every three seconds; just a note
that a given AVC had occurred 1000 times in the last hour or whatever
would be sufficient.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: installing TC3 on EFI

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 16:28 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 3:37 PM, moshe nahmias  wrote:
> 
> > BTW, if it's possible to do dual boot, one install with bios and the other 
> > with EFI then I can do it and then I will be able to do it for much longer 
> > since I have a bios installation now that works.
> 
> It's not advised to run CSM (BIOS) because in many (all?)
> implementations AHCI isn't fully supported so you get SATA devices in
> a fallback IDE mode and therefore poor performance.

My Asus motherboard does AHCI on CSM just fine.

>  Also ACPI is limited so battery life of the laptop isn't so great.

Do you have a source for this? I did a CSM install on my new laptop
because doing a native UEFI install was a pain, and I haven't noticed
any particular issues with drive performance or battery life.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:43:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend
> pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those
> SELinux messages - if your system logs aren't that important to you, you
> can safely just blow away the larger (over 10MB) files
> in /var/log/journal and that should trim the journal down to a
> reasonable size.

It would be handy if there were a journalctl command to force discard logs
from before a certain time or down to a certain size. I tried to look for an
existing RFE for this but couldn't find one, so I filed this:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974787


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: installing TC3 on EFI

2013-06-15 Thread Chris Murphy

On Jun 15, 2013, at 3:37 PM, moshe nahmias  wrote:

> BTW, if it's possible to do dual boot, one install with bios and the other 
> with EFI then I can do it and then I will be able to do it for much longer 
> since I have a bios installation now that works.

It's not advised to run CSM (BIOS) because in many (all?) implementations AHCI 
isn't fully supported so you get SATA devices in a fallback IDE mode and 
therefore poor performance. Also ACPI is limited so battery life of the laptop 
isn't so great. Of course in BIOS mode, there's a better chance of either linux 
or proprietary video drivers working and supporting power save modes for the 
GPU, whereas for UEFI the drivers are less common (but any day now I expect to 
be totally wrong on this).

Further, it looks like more than a handful of UEFI firmware implementations 
hang booting EFI OS's when the protective MBR 0xEE entry has the active flag 
set (pmbr_boot flag in parted). The setting of this flag is done by anaconda 
when the disk contains an existing GPT and the system is a BIOS mode boot at 
the time of the installation. So unless you're willing to set and unset that 
flag manually before rebooting you may find one or the other mode won't work.

Chris Murphy
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Unable to graphically EFI boot Fedora in vbox

2013-06-15 Thread Chris Murphy

On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:35 AM, Andre Robatino  wrote:

> Chris Murphy  colorremedies.com> writes:
> 
>>> I just tried it with Fedora-19-TC2-x86_64-DVD.iso in Oracle VirtualBox
>>> 4.2.12 and it worked for me.
>> 
>> Still not working with Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-TC3-1.iso and
> VirtualBox 4.2.12 on OS X. What are
>> your VirtualBox video settings? Do you have either 3D or 2D acceleration
> enabled? How much video memory?
>> And how many CPUs?
> 
> Guest additions and Extension Pack installed, 3D enabled, 2D disabled (it
> only works for Windows guests anyway), 12 MB of video memory, 1024 MB of
> RAM, 1 CPU.

OK well I can't build guest additions for Live media, since on reboot it's gone 
anyway. The issue is that booting Live media doesn't bring up X and therefore 
no gdm, no gnome shell, and no anaconda. So is the prescribed procedure to use 
text install in this case?


Chris Murphy
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 16:03 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:51:09 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > You're drawing an erroneous conclusion from a sample of two displays. It
> > is not always the case that larger displays have a higher native DPI
> > than smaller displays.
> 
> So we just need to all chip in and buy the anaconda developers
> one of these, and suddenly font sizes and readability would become a high
> priority :-).
> 
> http://www.sharp-world.com/products/professional-monitors/products/pn-k321/index.html

Oh, you can get a high DPI display much cheaper: just buy a MBP Retina
or a Pixel (or a Kirabook, now).

But they kinda prove the point that (as you say) dpi-fundamentalism is
misguided. My laptop is 1920x1080 at 13", which is about 170dpi, but if
I set it to 170 dpi the fonts look *huge*. If I set it to 170dpi and put
the laptop 1.5 feet away from my eyes, where my desktop displays are, it
looks fine...and then I can't type on it any more. In practice, I set my
laptop's dpi to about 130 to get it to 'look right'.

I rather suspect the world is going to go with the dumb-but-practical
Apple solution: have a few DPI Buckets and just support those. So maybe
you'll be able to use 96, 144 or 192 and things will be made to 'look
right'...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/15/2013 03:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:40 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

Update wants to replace rsyslog on my system- I have downgraded
rsyslog to
handle the "spamming log problem".


[root@franksfedora19 frank]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package rsyslog.i686 0:7.2.6-1.fc19 will be updated
---> Package rsyslog.i686 0:7.4.0-1.fc19 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution





Is it safe now to allow it to be upgraded ?

if you have updated to systemd 204-8, it ought to be safe.


I have.


If you have inflated logs from the SELinux accounts-daemon bug, then
rsyslog will still run the CPU to 100% for some time after the upgrade,
because it'll be writing the entire journal out to /var/log/messages;
but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend
pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those
SELinux messages - if your system logs aren't that important to you, you
can safely just blow away the larger (over 10MB) files
in /var/log/journal and that should trim the journal down to a
reasonable size.



I chose to deleteseems to be running fine...but I'll keep an 
eye on it for a while.


Thanks

--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:51:09 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:

> You're drawing an erroneous conclusion from a sample of two displays. It
> is not always the case that larger displays have a higher native DPI
> than smaller displays.

So we just need to all chip in and buy the anaconda developers
one of these, and suddenly font sizes and readability would become a high
priority :-).

http://www.sharp-world.com/products/professional-monitors/products/pn-k321/index.html
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:46 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:

> > Well, no, that's absolutely useless and just reviving a decade old
> > bikeshed. That is not what I was planning to do at all. Fixed 96dpi is a
> > ship that's sailed.
> 
> It can't be denied that forcing is doing what it's doing. Whether to do 
> anything about it directly is a different matter. If there's an easier way to 
> keep text from shrinking as display size increases, fine; but don't continue 
> to penalize people who follow a logical course of action when they need or 
> want bigger. Text that shrinks as available space for it increases is idiotic.

You're drawing an erroneous conclusion from a sample of two displays. It
is not always the case that larger displays have a higher native DPI
than smaller displays. In fact, desktop PC displays almost all have DPIs
in the narrow range of 95-110 - varying within that range in a fashion
that is not predictably related to screen size - precisely because
Windows locks its DPI to 96 by default, and with a 'logical' DPI of 96,
a display with a 'physical' DPI of about 100-105 is what looks 'right'
to most people.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:46 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-06-15 12:12 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
> 
> > The point is that there is only so much
> > space for text in the UI. Have you tried running anaconda in Japanese or
> > German at 800x600? When there's too much text on a spoke (those are both
> > languages which use a lot of characters to say the same thing compared
> > to English), the display of the spoke becomes entirely corrupted.
> 
> Who's forcing anyone to run a native display mode during installation? The 
> Mandriva/Mageia approach seems rather sensible: announce a limited choice of 
> display resolutions at initialization and in the docs, then use the highest 
> of the limited choices even when the device's native mode is much higher. 
> It/they default to 800x600, offering text and 1024x768 as alternatives, and 
> plant windows sized to 1024x768 in the middle of a larger background for any 
> who figure out how to (unnecessarily) get X into any mode higher than 
> 1024x768 during the OS installation process.

What? I didn't say anything about native resolutions. The point is that
anaconda's layout gets completely corrupted if text takes up too much
space. If you make the text bigger, which is what you're proposing,
people are inevitably going to start running into that problem.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Felix Miata

On 2013-06-15 12:14 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:


Oh, and trying to size an entire UI in relative units in a GTK+/glade
project is a giant PITA, so far as I understand.


Maybe with the increasing disparity among environments the time has come to 
retire it.

--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Felix Miata

On 2013-06-15 12:12 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:


The point is that there is only so much
space for text in the UI. Have you tried running anaconda in Japanese or
German at 800x600? When there's too much text on a spoke (those are both
languages which use a lot of characters to say the same thing compared
to English), the display of the spoke becomes entirely corrupted.


Who's forcing anyone to run a native display mode during installation? The 
Mandriva/Mageia approach seems rather sensible: announce a limited choice of 
display resolutions at initialization and in the docs, then use the highest 
of the limited choices even when the device's native mode is much higher. 
It/they default to 800x600, offering text and 1024x768 as alternatives, and 
plant windows sized to 1024x768 in the middle of a larger background for any 
who figure out how to (unnecessarily) get X into any mode higher than 
1024x768 during the OS installation process.



Well, no, that's absolutely useless and just reviving a decade old
bikeshed. That is not what I was planning to do at all. Fixed 96dpi is a
ship that's sailed.


It can't be denied that forcing is doing what it's doing. Whether to do 
anything about it directly is a different matter. If there's an easier way to 
keep text from shrinking as display size increases, fine; but don't continue 
to penalize people who follow a logical course of action when they need or 
want bigger. Text that shrinks as available space for it increases is idiotic.

--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:40 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Update wants to replace rsyslog on my system- I have downgraded
> rsyslog to
> handle the "spamming log problem".
> 
> 
> [root@franksfedora19 frank]# yum update
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package rsyslog.i686 0:7.2.6-1.fc19 will be updated
> ---> Package rsyslog.i686 0:7.4.0-1.fc19 will be an update
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Is it safe now to allow it to be upgraded ?

if you have updated to systemd 204-8, it ought to be safe.

If you have inflated logs from the SELinux accounts-daemon bug, then
rsyslog will still run the CPU to 100% for some time after the upgrade,
because it'll be writing the entire journal out to /var/log/messages;
but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend
pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those
SELinux messages - if your system logs aren't that important to you, you
can safely just blow away the larger (over 10MB) files
in /var/log/journal and that should trim the journal down to a
reasonable size.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: installing TC3 on EFI

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 22:37 +0300, moshe nahmias wrote:
> I can re-try but would prefer to know what I need to do before hand,
> so I won't need to do it again afterwards or at least lower the
> chances of doing so again.
> 
> 
> what should I do when the bug hit again? I don't care to try multiple
> times as long as it's done one after the other to find something and
> not for every question here.
> 
> 
> I do need this computer but can do it for now, hopefully the debugging
> will be short enough so we will be able to find the culprit before I
> will have to stop.

All we really need to do is get the backtrace out. You could try the
reporting tool again, or when it crashes, you can hit ctrl-alt-f2 which
should get you a console, and you should find an anaconda-tb-(something)
file in /tmp - you can fpaste it out if you have a network connection,
or plug in a USB stick, mount it and copy to that. Oh, and also
get /tmp/program.log. Thanks!

> BTW, if it's possible to do dual boot, one install with bios and the
> other with EFI

That's very unlikely to work on a single disk. It might work in theory
with two+ disks if you only have one type of install per disk, but it's
entirely possible that some firmwares would be buggy with this setup.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Validation tests not yet run against Final

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 12:20 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > Here are the installation test cases which have not yet been run against
> > any of the Final TCs for any arch:
> 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_PATA_device
> 
> I installed Fedora-19-Final-TC3-i386-DVD.iso MATE desktop to bare metal i686
> having no SATA channels and two PATA channels: one with two EIDE harddrives
> (IDE0 master and slave) and one with two DVD drives (IDE1 master and slave).
> Everything worked; all tests on that page above passed.
> I couldn't find the summary page to update the test coverage matrix.

D'oh, of course, I should have linked it.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Final_TC3_Install

you'd just want to insert a {{result|pass|jreiser}} (or whatever your
FAS name is) in the appropriate spot. Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: installing TC3 on EFI

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 21:09 +0300, moshe nahmias wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tried to install F19-TC3 on my laptop and it didn't work, while
> trying to file a bug anaconda stopped responding and just hang there,
> I wanted to try and copy the info that was on the retrace right below
> the question if I want to file a bug but couldn't.
> 
> The bug was reported according to ABRT as bug number 947142 for fedora
> 18.
> 
> When installing with bios it worked perfectly and now I update the
> system without rsyslog as adam suggested.
> 
> 
> If there is more info you need/want just ask away and I will do my
> best to answer it.

Unfortunately if you couldn't get the backtrace, it's pretty much
impossible to know what the problem was :( Can you re-try the install on
that laptop, or is it a system you need to use?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Validation tests not yet run against Final

2013-06-15 Thread John Reiser
> Here are the installation test cases which have not yet been run against
> any of the Final TCs for any arch:

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_PATA_device

I installed Fedora-19-Final-TC3-i386-DVD.iso MATE desktop to bare metal i686
having no SATA channels and two PATA channels: one with two EIDE harddrives
(IDE0 master and slave) and one with two DVD drives (IDE1 master and slave).
Everything worked; all tests on that page above passed.
I couldn't find the summary page to update the test coverage matrix.

-- 

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Felix Miata

On 2013-06-15 15:04 (GMT-0400) Tom Horsley composed:


On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:57:18 -0400 Felix Miata wrote:



X forced DPI = 96 on displays natively > 96 DPI causes a11y issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974780



But you gotta be really careful :-). My Samsung TV I use as
a display reports itself as 7 inches (it is really 46). If
it actually believes the EDID info, you get fonts so gigantic
nothing actually fits on the screen :-).


Obviously competent provision for working around bad EDID is necessary. The 
bug is explicitly about working with valid EDID.

--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 12:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 14:57 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On 2013-06-15 08:08 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
> > 
> > >> I would want (for F20 if possible) to be able to change the font size 
> > >> easily.
> > 
> > > It's really not technically possible to do that with how anaconda's
> > > written.
> > 
> > I suspect the solution is both possible, and easier than you think. Likely 
> > it's constructed in similar fashion to web pages that size in pixels 
> > instead 
> > of characters (em/rem/ex) or fractions thereof. Dispensing with pixel 
> > values 
> > of more than a single digit for sizing anything other than bitmap images 
> > unleashes the natural adaptability of a display screen that doesn't apply 
> > to 
> > designing for paper.
> 
> No, that's not the point at all. The point is that there is only so much
> space for text in the UI. Have you tried running anaconda in Japanese or
> German at 800x600? When there's too much text on a spoke (those are both
> languages which use a lot of characters to say the same thing compared
> to English), the display of the spoke becomes entirely corrupted.

Oh, and trying to size an entire UI in relative units in a GTK+/glade
project is a giant PITA, so far as I understand.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 14:57 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-06-15 08:08 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
> 
> >> I would want (for F20 if possible) to be able to change the font size 
> >> easily.
> 
> > It's really not technically possible to do that with how anaconda's
> > written.
> 
> I suspect the solution is both possible, and easier than you think. Likely 
> it's constructed in similar fashion to web pages that size in pixels instead 
> of characters (em/rem/ex) or fractions thereof. Dispensing with pixel values 
> of more than a single digit for sizing anything other than bitmap images 
> unleashes the natural adaptability of a display screen that doesn't apply to 
> designing for paper.

No, that's not the point at all. The point is that there is only so much
space for text in the UI. Have you tried running anaconda in Japanese or
German at 800x600? When there's too much text on a spoke (those are both
languages which use a lot of characters to say the same thing compared
to English), the display of the spoke becomes entirely corrupted.

> >  The UI is to an extent written around the text. You can't just
> > change all the text to be 20pt in size and still have the UI work; stuff
> > just doesn't _fit_ any more.
> 
> > I'm going to look up some a11y guidelines from respectable institutions
> > and file a few bugs on things it might be plausible to fix, but it's not
> > any kind of simple 'implement ctrl+' fix, I'm afraid.
> 
> I've filed the first one for you:
> 
> X forced DPI = 96 on displays natively > 96 DPI causes a11y issues
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974780

Well, no, that's absolutely useless and just reviving a decade old
bikeshed. That is not what I was planning to do at all. Fixed 96dpi is a
ship that's sailed.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:57:18 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:

> X forced DPI = 96 on displays natively > 96 DPI causes a11y issues
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974780

But you gotta be really careful :-). My Samsung TV I use as
a display reports itself as 7 inches (it is really 46). If
it actually believes the EDID info, you get fonts so gigantic
nothing actually fits on the screen :-).
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Felix Miata

On 2013-06-15 08:08 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:


I would want (for F20 if possible) to be able to change the font size easily.



It's really not technically possible to do that with how anaconda's
written.


I suspect the solution is both possible, and easier than you think. Likely 
it's constructed in similar fashion to web pages that size in pixels instead 
of characters (em/rem/ex) or fractions thereof. Dispensing with pixel values 
of more than a single digit for sizing anything other than bitmap images 
unleashes the natural adaptability of a display screen that doesn't apply to 
designing for paper.



 The UI is to an extent written around the text. You can't just
change all the text to be 20pt in size and still have the UI work; stuff
just doesn't _fit_ any more.



I'm going to look up some a11y guidelines from respectable institutions
and file a few bugs on things it might be plausible to fix, but it's not
any kind of simple 'implement ctrl+' fix, I'm afraid.


I've filed the first one for you:

X forced DPI = 96 on displays natively > 96 DPI causes a11y issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974780
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Problem with xorg-x11 or mesa or radeon.

2013-06-15 Thread Joshua Andrews
I have Fedora 19 installed in virtualbox running on Win 7 host and I
have Fedora 19 running on bare metal on the same machine --not at the
same time of course.
Anyway, blender works perfect running in VBox but on bare metal it
crashes. The difference between the systems are mesa and radeon driver
which is what makes me think the problem is there but I really don't
know how to debug it.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: consider people with poor vision, was Re: F19 Installer a little better, but...[consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 12:07 +0300, moshe nahmias wrote:
> I agree with Gavin, I have a poor vision because of Keratoconus and on
> most cases it's not easy or comfortable for me to read things when
> installing fedora.
> 
> More important is that we should consider poor eyesight since we want
> any one to be able to install and use fedora.
> 
> I would want (for F20 if possible) to be able to change the font size
> easily.

It's really not technically possible to do that with how anaconda's
written. The UI is to an extent written around the text. You can't just
change all the text to be 20pt in size and still have the UI work; stuff
just doesn't _fit_ any more.

I'm going to look up some a11y guidelines from respectable institutions
and file a few bugs on things it might be plausible to fix, but it's not
any kind of simple 'implement ctrl+' fix, I'm afraid.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F-19 Branched report: 20130615 changes

2013-06-15 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Jun 15 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires ogg
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires OGG
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires ogg
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires OGG
derelict-ogg-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires ogg
derelict-ogg-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires OGG
derelict-ogg-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires ogg
derelict-ogg-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires OGG
derelict-pq-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires pq
derelict-pq-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires PQ
derelict-pq-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires pq
derelict-pq-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires PQ
derelict-pq-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires pq
derelict-pq-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires PQ
derelict-pq-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires pq
derelict-pq-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires PQ
derelict-tcod-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires tcod
derelict-tcod-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires TCOD
derelict-tcod-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires tcod
derelict-tcod-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires TCOD
derelict-tcod-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires tcod
derelict-tcod-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires TCOD
derelict-tcod-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires tcod
derelict-tcod-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.x86_64 requires TCOD
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19
[dsqlite]
dsqlite-1.0-4.fc19.i686 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60
dsqlite-1.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[dustmite]
dustmite-1-8.20121031git1fb3ac4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[freeipa]
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires pki-ca = 0:10.0.2
[gl3n]
gl3n-0.20120813-4.fc19.i686 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60
gl3n-0.20120813-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java
[kawa]
1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25
[koji]
koji-vm-1.8.0-1.fc19.noarch requires python-virtinst
[libkolab]
php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64
php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64
[nodejs-tilelive]
nodejs-tilelive-4.4.3-2.fc19.noarch requires npm(optimist) < 0:0.4
[openbox]
gdm-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires gnome-panel
gnome-panel-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires 
gnome-panel
[ovirt-engine]
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires 
classpathx-mail
[ovirt-guest-agent]
ovirt-guest-agent-gdm-plugin-1.0.6-6.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libgdmsimplegreeter.so.1()(64bit)
[perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene]
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
[perl-Bio-SamTools]
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
[python-TraitsBackendQt]
python-TraitsBackendQt-3.5.0-5.fc19.noarch requires python-TraitsGUI
[scala]
scala-2.9.2-2.fc19.noarch requires osgi(org.scala-ide.scala.library)
[spacewalk-web]
spacewalk-dobby-1.9.22-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Spacewalk::Setup)
[stoken]
stoken-devel-0.2-4.fc19.i686 requires pkgconfig(libtomcrypt)
stoken-devel-0.2-4.fc19.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(libtomcrypt)
[tango]
tango-2-12.20120821git7b92443.fc19.i686 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60
tango-2-12.20120821git7b92443.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[zarafa]
php-mapi-7.0.13-1.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64
php-mapi-7.0.13-1.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64



Broken deps for i386
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.i686 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires ogg
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires OGG
derelict-ogg-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires ogg
derelict-ogg-devel-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires OGG
derelict-pq-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 requires pq
dere

rawhide report: 20130615 changes

2013-06-15 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Jun 15 08:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[0ad]
0ad-0.0.13-2.fc20.x86_64 requires libenet-1.3.7.so()(64bit)
[aries-blueprint]
aries-blueprint-0.3.1-5.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[aries-proxy]
aries-proxy-0.3-4.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[cxf]
1:cxf-rt-2.6.6-1.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.12-6.fc20.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.8.1-1.fc20
gcc-python2-plugin-0.12-6.fc20.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.8.1-1.fc20
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-6.fc20.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.8.1-1.fc20
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-6.fc20.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.8.1-1.fc20
[gdb-heap]
gdb-heap-0.5-12.fc19.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 0:2.17
[gnuplot]
gnuplot-4.6.2-2.fc20.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
gnuplot-minimal-4.6.2-2.fc20.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java
[kawa]
1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25
[koji]
koji-vm-1.8.0-1.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst
[kyua-cli]
kyua-cli-0.5-3.fc19.x86_64 requires liblutok.so.0()(64bit)
kyua-cli-tests-0.5-3.fc19.x86_64 requires liblutok.so.0()(64bit)
[lancet]
lancet-1.0.1-6.fc19.noarch requires ant-nodeps >= 0:1.7.1
[nodejs-better-assert]
nodejs-better-assert-1.0.0-1.fc20.noarch requires npm(callsite) = 
0:1.0.0
[openbox]
gdm-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires gnome-panel
gnome-panel-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires 
gnome-panel
[openlierox]
openlierox-0.59-0.11.beta10.fc20.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
[ovirt-engine]
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires 
classpathx-mail
[ovirt-guest-agent]
ovirt-guest-agent-gdm-plugin-1.0.6-6.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libgdmsimplegreeter.so.1()(64bit)
[oyranos]
oyranos-libs-0.4.0-7.fc19.i686 requires libraw.so.5
oyranos-libs-0.4.0-7.fc19.x86_64 requires libraw.so.5()(64bit)
[perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene]
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
[perl-Bio-SamTools]
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
[perl-PDL]
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
[python-TraitsBackendQt]
python-TraitsBackendQt-3.5.0-5.fc19.noarch requires python-TraitsGUI
[python-flask-admin]
python-flask-admin-1.0.5-3.fc20.noarch requires python-wtf-peewee
[qpid-cpp]
qpid-qmf-0.22-1.1.fc20.i686 requires python-qpid >= 0:0.22
qpid-qmf-0.22-1.1.fc20.x86_64 requires python-qpid >= 0:0.22
[redeclipse]
redeclipse-1.4-3.fc20.x86_64 requires libenet-1.3.7.so()(64bit)
redeclipse-server-1.4-3.fc20.x86_64 requires libenet-1.3.7.so()(64bit)
[ruby-RMagick]
ruby-RMagick-2.13.1-11.fc20.1.x86_64 requires ImageMagick = 0:6.8.3.9
[rubygem-openshift-origin-common]
rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.8.10-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(safe_yaml)
[rubygem-openshift-origin-node]
rubygem-openshift-origin-node-1.9.15-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(safe_yaml)
rubygem-openshift-origin-node-1.9.15-1.fc20.noarch requires 
openshift-origin-node-proxy
[rubygem-qpid]
rubygem-qpid-0.16.0-14.fc20.x86_64 requires libqpidtypes.so.1()(64bit)
rubygem-qpid-0.16.0-14.fc20.x86_64 requires 
libqpidmessaging.so.3()(64bit)
rubygem-qpid-0.16.0-14.fc20.x86_64 requires libqpidcommon.so.5()(64bit)
rubygem-qpid-0.16.0-14.fc20.x86_64 requires libqpidclient.so.5()(64bit)
[rubygem-qpid_messaging]
rubygem-qpid_messaging-0.20.2-1.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libqpidtypes.so.1()(64bit)
rubygem-qpid_messaging-0.20.2-1.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libqpidmessaging.so.3()(64bit)
rubygem-qpid_messaging-0.20.2-1.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libqpidcommon.so.5()(64bit)
rubygem-qpid_messaging-0.20.2-1.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libqpidclient.so.5()(64bit)
[sagemath]
sagemath-core-5.9-5.fc20.i686 requires libgd.so.2
sagemath-core-5.9-5.fc20.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
[scala]
scala-2.9.2-2.fc19.noarch requires osgi(org.scala-ide.scala.library)
[shim-signed]
shim-0.2-4.4.fc20.x86_64 requires shim-unsigned >= 0:0.3-2.fc20
[spacewalk-web]
spacewalk-dobby-1.9.22-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Spacewalk::Setup)
[speed-dreams]
speed-dreams-2.1.0-13.trunk_r4810.fc20.2.i686 requires libenet-1.3.7.so
speed-dreams-2.1.0-13.trunk_r4810.fc20.2.x86_64 requires 
libenet-1.3.7.so()(64bit)
[spring]
spring-94.1-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libassimp.so.2()(64bit)
[sumwars]
sumwars-0.5.6-12.fc20.x86_64 requires libenet-1.3

Re: yum question "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"

2013-06-15 Thread Remi Collet
Le 15/06/2013 10:52, Someone Somewhere a écrit :
> I think it should stand for yes/default/no.
> Default action may be different depending on the scrnario. Eg while
> installing it may be yes but qhile erasing it may be a no.
> Can someone confirm if my interpretation is correct?

Default action is the one in uppercase

Remi.

> -Kunal
> On Jun 15, 2013 2:17 PM, "Remi Collet"  > wrote:
>>
>> Le 15/06/2013 10:43, Joachim Backes a écrit :
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > can anybody explain the meaning of "d" in the yum prompt
>> > "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"? Googling this, I found this question too, but no
>> > answer.
>>
>> download
>>
>> >
>> > Kind regards
>> >
>> > Joachim Backes
>>
>> --
>> test mailing list
>> test@lists.fedoraproject.org 
>> To unsubscribe:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> 
> 
> 

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum question "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"

2013-06-15 Thread Frank Murphy
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:22:24 +0530
Someone Somewhere  wrote:

> I think it should stand for yes/default/no.+
> Default action may be different depending on the scrnario. Eg while
> installing it may be yes but qhile erasing it may be a no.
> Can someone confirm if my interpretation is correct?

You are incorrect.

-- 
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum question "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"

2013-06-15 Thread Frank Murphy
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:43:21 +0200
Joachim Backes  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> can anybody explain the meaning of "d" in the yum prompt
> "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"? Googling this, I found this question too,
> but no answer.
> 

The same as putting "yum --downloadonly"

-- 
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum question "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"

2013-06-15 Thread Remi Collet
Le 15/06/2013 10:43, Joachim Backes a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> can anybody explain the meaning of "d" in the yum prompt
> "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"? Googling this, I found this question too, but no
> answer.

download

> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Joachim Backes

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

yum question "Is this ok [y/d/N]:"

2013-06-15 Thread Joachim Backes

Hi all,

can anybody explain the meaning of "d" in the yum prompt
"Is this ok [y/d/N]:"? Googling this, I found this question too, but no 
answer.


Kind regards

Joachim Backes
--

Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.6-300.fc19.x86_64

Joachim Backes 
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

consider people with poor vision, was Re: F19 Installer a little better, but...[consider people with poor vision

2013-06-15 Thread Gavin Flower

On 15/06/13 16:22, Felix Miata wrote:

On 2013-06-14 12:53 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:

[...]

Among the many other complaints other people have raised

about the installer, I don't recall one other person complaining about
text being too small.


Do you think people in the business of developing software or 
otherwise using a PC for most of any given work day are people whose 
vision is below average? I don't. I think quite the opposite, that 
those with poorer than average vision gravitate away from using a PC 
screen any more than they must, that many won't do it at all, and that 
few such people pursue occupations that require doing more than a 
little that requires using a PC. Net result is most in the puter 
business, including FOSS software testers, have both better than 
average vision, and more importantly, little or no understanding of or 
appreciation for the difficulties encountered by those who see less 
well. People aren't complaining because the people doing are almost 
entirely made up of a class of people with good vision, people who do 
it because they don't have undue visual obstacles to doing it.

[...]
For several years, I often had very misty vision because the layer of 
cells above my cornea could not handle moisture properly. Sometimes it 
was so bad that I could hardly read the keyboard at 300mm, and glancing 
around the screen meant I could eassily miss things.  I remember 
concentrating hard to resolve whether a character was a comma ',' or a 
full stop '.' (similarly 'a' & 'e') - not good for a software developer.


I have had cataract surgery, and surgery to replace those layer of cells 
from grafts.  So now I can see the screen quite fine with glasses - even 
from a metre away, whereas previously I needed to be at 600mm or closer 
depending on how misty my eyes were.


Well I am 62 and still doing software development - so please do not put 
important things in small print and avoid dark grey text on a light grey 
background etc. (I can read it if I notice it, but I might miss its 
significant if I just glance at the screen).  When my eyes were misty, I 
often recognised things by their overall shape even when individual 
characters where fuzzy.


I am lucky (I know people who were a lot younger than I am, with much 
worse vision), I now can reduce fonts to less than their default sizes 
and see quite well, though I notice I tend to make browser text bigger. 
For me, what helped most (prior to my eye surgeries) was getting a 30" 
monitor. Now the biggest nuisance is swapping glasses: one for my 
laptop, one for my monitor, and no glasses required for walking around & 
driving.


In conclusion, there is a whole continuum between perfect vision & being 
blind.  So for really important things, especially if considered 
unexpected (either by new people - or people familiar with that screen, 
but something important has changed)  be carefully how the text is 
presented.



Cheers,
Gavin

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test