Re: [Tex-music] difficulty with inline TeX within pmx
Thank you. That makes sense. --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Archive stats observations and mysteries
> >Don Simons wrote: > >> I wrote >> >> >>..it looks like every single file in the archive has been downloaded at >> >> least once, including of course many that are not linked from any of the >> web >> >> pages. Any good ideas how or why that could happen? >> >> And Christian replied >> >> >Just a guess: the counts are file accesses rather than more specifically >> >downloads. If that is true any file has been accessed at least once when >> >it was uploaded. >> >> I doubt that, because practically all of these files were originally >> uploaded before you started including the .zip's in the count. I check some >> more to see if it really does include all of the files. > >far more likely it's a crawler "signal" (there are masses of them, and >they skew the stats of the tex faq something rotten). > >robin Well, if we knew this crawler (or any others) hit ALL the files, we could correct the counts by subtracting from all sums the (small) number reported for the many files that obviously no one would want. --Don --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Archive stats observations and mysteries
Don Simons wrote: > I wrote > > >>..it looks like every single file in the archive has been downloaded at > >> least once, including of course many that are not linked from any of the > web > >> pages. Any good ideas how or why that could happen? > > And Christian replied > > >Just a guess: the counts are file accesses rather than more specifically > >downloads. If that is true any file has been accessed at least once when > >it was uploaded. > > I doubt that, because practically all of these files were originally > uploaded before you started including the .zip's in the count. I check some > more to see if it really does include all of the files. far more likely it's a crawler "signal" (there are masses of them, and they skew the stats of the tex faq something rotten). robin --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Archive stats observations and mysteries
Don Simons wrote: I wrote ..it looks like every single file in the archive has been downloaded at least once, including of course many that are not linked from any of the web pages. Any good ideas how or why that could happen? And Christian replied Just a guess: the counts are file accesses rather than more specifically downloads. If that is true any file has been accessed at least once when it was uploaded. I doubt that, because practically all of these files were originally uploaded before you started including the .zip's in the count. I check some more to see if it really does include all of the files. There is a webalizer FAQ at http://www.webalizer.org/faq.html It's section 5 explains the difference between 'hits' and 'files': 'HITS is the total number of HTTP requests that the server received during the reporting period.' Maybe webalizer's own activities involve http requests. --Don Simons -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Archive stats observations and mysteries
I wrote >>..it looks like every single file in the archive has been downloaded at >> least once, including of course many that are not linked from any of the web >> pages. Any good ideas how or why that could happen? And Christian replied >Just a guess: the counts are file accesses rather than more specifically >downloads. If that is true any file has been accessed at least once when >it was uploaded. I doubt that, because practically all of these files were originally uploaded before you started including the .zip's in the count. I check some more to see if it really does include all of the files. --Don Simons --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Archive stats observations and mysteries
Don Simons wrote: Thanks to Christian for adding the .zip files to the webalizer. Now, with help from the filtering capabilities of Excel, I can quickly whittle down the list of 100K+ files to just the 202 .zip's in the software directory or below. When I do that, a VERY curious result appears: I haven't checked for sure, but it looks like every single file in the archive has been downloaded at least once, including of course many that are not linked from any of the web pages. Any good ideas how or why that could happen? Just a guess: the counts are file accesses rather than more specifically downloads. If that is true any file has been accessed at least once when it was uploaded. What exactly counts as a download in these stats? BTW, there were only 11 such files with>1 download (in ~4 days), with musixtex.zip leading at 14, and musixflx.pkg.zip and pmx2613.zip tied for 2nd at 5. Curiously, the 3 bitmapped musixtex font files were each downloaded twice; I would have assumed those were completely obsolete. --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
OK, you are going to laugh about this: I just forgot to delete the old .mx1 and .mx2 files… I needed almost an hour to figure that out. All works fine now Thanks, Philipp Am 01.07.2011 um 18:24 schrieb Don Simons: > That's pretty mysterious. Please report back if you figure out why. > >> -Original Message- >> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On > Behalf Of >> Philipp Neukel >> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 9:03 AM >> To: Werner Icking Music Archive >> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight >> >> It does work that way, but it completely screws up my layout. I will work > on that. Thanks >> Philipp >> Am 01.07.2011 um 17:57 schrieb Don Simons: >> >>> Try typing "etex" instead. >>> -Original Message- From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On >>> Behalf Of Philipp Neukel Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:55 AM To: Werner Icking Music Archive Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight I don't think so. I typed "tex FILE" in the terminal. That is how I > usually >>> do it. Am 01.07.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Don Simons: > I think I got it, and sorry I didn't think of this before. Are you >>> running > eTeX? > > --Don > > > --- > TeX-music@tug.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
That's pretty mysterious. Please report back if you figure out why. >-Original Message- >From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of >Philipp Neukel >Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 9:03 AM >To: Werner Icking Music Archive >Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight > >It does work that way, but it completely screws up my layout. I will work on that. Thanks >Philipp >Am 01.07.2011 um 17:57 schrieb Don Simons: > >> Try typing "etex" instead. >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On >> Behalf Of >>> Philipp Neukel >>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:55 AM >>> To: Werner Icking Music Archive >>> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight >>> >>> I don't think so. I typed "tex FILE" in the terminal. That is how I usually >> do it. >>> >>> Am 01.07.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Don Simons: >>> I think I got it, and sorry I didn't think of this before. Are you >> running eTeX? --Don --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
It does work that way, but it completely screws up my layout. I will work on
that. Thanks
Philipp
Am 01.07.2011 um 17:57 schrieb Don Simons:
> Try typing "etex" instead.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
> Behalf Of
>> Philipp Neukel
>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:55 AM
>> To: Werner Icking Music Archive
>> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>>
>> I don't think so. I typed "tex FILE" in the terminal. That is how I usually
> do it.
>>
>> Am 01.07.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Don Simons:
>>
>>> I think I got it, and sorry I didn't think of this before. Are you
> running
>>> eTeX?
>>>
>>> --Don
>>>
-Original Message-
From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
>>> Behalf Of
Philipp Neukel
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:37 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
I completely reinstalled Musix (including a texhash run) but this is all
> I
>>> get:
$$$
This is TeX, Version 3.1415926 (TeX Live 2010)
(./panofka.tex
> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/musixtex/musixtex.tex
MusiXTeX(c) 1.15 <3 April 2011>
maxinstruments=6 max128beams=6 maxgroups=3 maxslurs=6 maxtrills=6
maxoctlines=6)
>>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/pmx/pmx.tex
PMX, a Preprocessor for MusiXTeX, Version 2.602a <17 November 10>
) maxslurs=24
! No room for a new \dimen .
\ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
\fi
\alloc@ ...\advance \count 1#1by\@ne \ch@ck #1#4#2
\allocationnumber
> =\count
>>> ...
\body ...newskdim \csname e@z\roman@c@ \endcsname
\expandafter
>>> \noexpand@new...
\next ->\body
\let \next \iterate \else \let \next \relax \fi \next
\setmaxinstruments ...t@ <\maxinstruments \repeat
\expandafter \message
>>> \exp...
l.8 \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}
%
?
$$$
I have noticed that for some files the folder structure is altered. For
>>> example:
texmf-local/fonts/tfm/musixtex
seems to be nonexistent. For the new distribution the files are here:
texmf-local/fonts/tfm
Is this of any concern?
Philipp
Am 01.07.2011 um 17:17 schrieb Don Simons:
> That's a line I added in PMX 2.6+ specifically to work with MusiXTeX
>>> 1.15.
> It fails with earlier versions of musixtex. I assume by "killing" your
> compilation you mean that when you remove the line from the TeX file it
>>> then
> works OK. That behavior is consistent with not having properly upgraded
>>> to
> MusiXTeX 1.15. Please check your system to be sure there aren't any
>>> stray,
> older copies of musixtex.tex lurking somewhere higher up in the TeX
>>> search
> path, including your working directory. If that doesn't do it, please
>>> report
> back.
>
> --Don Simons
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
> Behalf Of
>> Philipp Neukel
>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:04 AM
>> To: tex-music@tug.org
>> Subject: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and
> installing it, it
>> messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number
> Eight)
>>> to
> the Tex
>> File:
>>
>> $ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
>>
>> my PMX preamble looks like this:
>>
>> $$$
>>
>> 3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
>> 0 6 16 .2
>> %
>> Pianoforte
>> Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
>> %
>> btt
>> ./
>> Apr
>> h270m
>> w190m
>> \\input musixger\
>> \\setsign2{-2}\
>> %
>>
>> $$$
>>
>> I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills
>>> my
> TeX. What is
>> triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid
>>> this
> line or/and its
>> consequences?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Philipp
>> D-40472
>>
>> ---
>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
>
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscri
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
Try typing "etex" instead.
>-Original Message-
>From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
Behalf Of
>Philipp Neukel
>Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:55 AM
>To: Werner Icking Music Archive
>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>
>I don't think so. I typed "tex FILE" in the terminal. That is how I usually
do it.
>
>Am 01.07.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Don Simons:
>
>> I think I got it, and sorry I didn't think of this before. Are you
running
>> eTeX?
>>
>> --Don
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
>> Behalf Of
>>> Philipp Neukel
>>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:37 AM
>>> To: Werner Icking Music Archive
>>> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>>>
>>> I completely reinstalled Musix (including a texhash run) but this is all
I
>> get:
>>>
>>> $$$
>>>
>>> This is TeX, Version 3.1415926 (TeX Live 2010)
>>> (./panofka.tex
>>>
(/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/musixtex/musixtex.tex
>>> MusiXTeX(c) 1.15 <3 April 2011>
>>> maxinstruments=6 max128beams=6 maxgroups=3 maxslurs=6 maxtrills=6
>>> maxoctlines=6)
>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/pmx/pmx.tex
>>> PMX, a Preprocessor for MusiXTeX, Version 2.602a <17 November 10>
>>> ) maxslurs=24
>>> ! No room for a new \dimen .
>>> \ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
>>> \fi
>>> \alloc@ ...\advance \count 1#1by\@ne \ch@ck #1#4#2
>>> \allocationnumber
=\count
>> ...
>>>
>>> \body ...newskdim \csname e@z\roman@c@ \endcsname
>>> \expandafter
>> \noexpand@new...
>>>
>>> \next ->\body
>>> \let \next \iterate \else \let \next \relax \fi \next
>>> \setmaxinstruments ...t@ <\maxinstruments \repeat
>>> \expandafter \message
>> \exp...
>>> l.8 \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}
>>> %
>>> ?
>>>
>>> $$$
>>>
>>> I have noticed that for some files the folder structure is altered. For
>> example:
>>> texmf-local/fonts/tfm/musixtex
>>> seems to be nonexistent. For the new distribution the files are here:
>>> texmf-local/fonts/tfm
>>> Is this of any concern?
>>>
>>> Philipp
>>> Am 01.07.2011 um 17:17 schrieb Don Simons:
>>>
That's a line I added in PMX 2.6+ specifically to work with MusiXTeX
>> 1.15.
It fails with earlier versions of musixtex. I assume by "killing" your
compilation you mean that when you remove the line from the TeX file it
>> then
works OK. That behavior is consistent with not having properly upgraded
>> to
MusiXTeX 1.15. Please check your system to be sure there aren't any
>> stray,
older copies of musixtex.tex lurking somewhere higher up in the TeX
>> search
path, including your working directory. If that doesn't do it, please
>> report
back.
--Don Simons
> -Original Message-
> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
Behalf Of
> Philipp Neukel
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:04 AM
> To: tex-music@tug.org
> Subject: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and
installing it, it
> messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number
Eight)
>> to
the Tex
> File:
>
> $ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
>
> my PMX preamble looks like this:
>
> $$$
>
> 3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
> 0 6 16 .2
> %
> Pianoforte
> Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
> %
> btt
> ./
> Apr
> h270m
> w190m
> \\input musixger\
> \\setsign2{-2}\
> %
>
> $$$
>
> I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills
>> my
TeX. What is
> triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid
>> this
line or/and its
> consequences?
>
> Thanks,
> Philipp
> D-40472
>
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>>
>>
>> ---
>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
>
>---
>TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>If you want to unsu
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
I don't think so. I typed "tex FILE" in the terminal. That is how I usually do
it.
Am 01.07.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Don Simons:
> I think I got it, and sorry I didn't think of this before. Are you running
> eTeX?
>
> --Don
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
> Behalf Of
>> Philipp Neukel
>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:37 AM
>> To: Werner Icking Music Archive
>> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>>
>> I completely reinstalled Musix (including a texhash run) but this is all I
> get:
>>
>> $$$
>>
>> This is TeX, Version 3.1415926 (TeX Live 2010)
>> (./panofka.tex
>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/musixtex/musixtex.tex
>> MusiXTeX(c) 1.15 <3 April 2011>
>> maxinstruments=6 max128beams=6 maxgroups=3 maxslurs=6 maxtrills=6
>> maxoctlines=6)
> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/pmx/pmx.tex
>> PMX, a Preprocessor for MusiXTeX, Version 2.602a <17 November 10>
>> ) maxslurs=24
>> ! No room for a new \dimen .
>> \ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
>> \fi
>> \alloc@ ...\advance \count 1#1by\@ne \ch@ck #1#4#2
>> \allocationnumber =\count
> ...
>>
>> \body ...newskdim \csname e@z\roman@c@ \endcsname
>> \expandafter
> \noexpand@new...
>>
>> \next ->\body
>> \let \next \iterate \else \let \next \relax \fi \next
>> \setmaxinstruments ...t@ <\maxinstruments \repeat
>> \expandafter \message
> \exp...
>> l.8 \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}
>> %
>> ?
>>
>> $$$
>>
>> I have noticed that for some files the folder structure is altered. For
> example:
>> texmf-local/fonts/tfm/musixtex
>> seems to be nonexistent. For the new distribution the files are here:
>> texmf-local/fonts/tfm
>> Is this of any concern?
>>
>> Philipp
>> Am 01.07.2011 um 17:17 schrieb Don Simons:
>>
>>> That's a line I added in PMX 2.6+ specifically to work with MusiXTeX
> 1.15.
>>> It fails with earlier versions of musixtex. I assume by "killing" your
>>> compilation you mean that when you remove the line from the TeX file it
> then
>>> works OK. That behavior is consistent with not having properly upgraded
> to
>>> MusiXTeX 1.15. Please check your system to be sure there aren't any
> stray,
>>> older copies of musixtex.tex lurking somewhere higher up in the TeX
> search
>>> path, including your working directory. If that doesn't do it, please
> report
>>> back.
>>>
>>> --Don Simons
>>>
-Original Message-
From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
>>> Behalf Of
Philipp Neukel
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:04 AM
To: tex-music@tug.org
Subject: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
Hello,
I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and
>>> installing it, it
messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number Eight)
> to
>>> the Tex
File:
$ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
my PMX preamble looks like this:
$$$
3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
0 6 16 .2
%
Pianoforte
Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
%
btt
./
Apr
h270m
w190m
\\input musixger\
\\setsign2{-2}\
%
$$$
I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills
> my
>>> TeX. What is
triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid
> this
>>> line or/and its
consequences?
Thanks,
Philipp
D-40472
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>>
>>
>> ---
>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
>
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
I think I got it, and sorry I didn't think of this before. Are you running
eTeX?
--Don
>-Original Message-
>From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
Behalf Of
>Philipp Neukel
>Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:37 AM
>To: Werner Icking Music Archive
>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>
>I completely reinstalled Musix (including a texhash run) but this is all I
get:
>
>$$$
>
>This is TeX, Version 3.1415926 (TeX Live 2010)
>(./panofka.tex
>(/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/musixtex/musixtex.tex
>MusiXTeX(c) 1.15 <3 April 2011>
>maxinstruments=6 max128beams=6 maxgroups=3 maxslurs=6 maxtrills=6
>maxoctlines=6)
(/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/pmx/pmx.tex
>PMX, a Preprocessor for MusiXTeX, Version 2.602a <17 November 10>
>) maxslurs=24
>! No room for a new \dimen .
>\ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
> \fi
>\alloc@ ...\advance \count 1#1by\@ne \ch@ck #1#4#2
> \allocationnumber =\count
...
>
>\body ...newskdim \csname e@z\roman@c@ \endcsname
> \expandafter
\noexpand@new...
>
>\next ->\body
> \let \next \iterate \else \let \next \relax \fi \next
>\setmaxinstruments ...t@ <\maxinstruments \repeat
> \expandafter \message
\exp...
>l.8 \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}
> %
>?
>
>$$$
>
>I have noticed that for some files the folder structure is altered. For
example:
>texmf-local/fonts/tfm/musixtex
>seems to be nonexistent. For the new distribution the files are here:
>texmf-local/fonts/tfm
>Is this of any concern?
>
>Philipp
>Am 01.07.2011 um 17:17 schrieb Don Simons:
>
>> That's a line I added in PMX 2.6+ specifically to work with MusiXTeX
1.15.
>> It fails with earlier versions of musixtex. I assume by "killing" your
>> compilation you mean that when you remove the line from the TeX file it
then
>> works OK. That behavior is consistent with not having properly upgraded
to
>> MusiXTeX 1.15. Please check your system to be sure there aren't any
stray,
>> older copies of musixtex.tex lurking somewhere higher up in the TeX
search
>> path, including your working directory. If that doesn't do it, please
report
>> back.
>>
>> --Don Simons
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
>> Behalf Of
>>> Philipp Neukel
>>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:04 AM
>>> To: tex-music@tug.org
>>> Subject: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and
>> installing it, it
>>> messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number Eight)
to
>> the Tex
>>> File:
>>>
>>> $ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
>>>
>>> my PMX preamble looks like this:
>>>
>>> $$$
>>>
>>> 3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
>>> 0 6 16 .2
>>> %
>>> Pianoforte
>>> Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
>>> %
>>> btt
>>> ./
>>> Apr
>>> h270m
>>> w190m
>>> \\input musixger\
>>> \\setsign2{-2}\
>>> %
>>>
>>> $$$
>>>
>>> I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills
my
>> TeX. What is
>>> triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid
this
>> line or/and its
>>> consequences?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Philipp
>>> D-40472
>>>
>>> ---
>>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>>
>>
>> ---
>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
>
>---
>TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Archive stats observations and mysteries
Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote >On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Don Simons wrote: > >> There are also 177 hits to pages in the memorial folder. As best I can >> determine, there are no remaining links on the main page to anything in that >> folder (I looked at the source and they seem to be commented out). Does >> anyone have any idea what's going on here? Could that many people have been >> both clever and inquisitive enough to look in the page's source? [...] > >A Google search with "http://icking-music-archive.org/Memorial"; gives 9 >results, most of them related to Daniel, e.g. >http://www.mail-archive.com/tex-music@sunsite.dk/msg02234.html >... Thanks to Christian for adding the .zip files to the webalizer. Now, with help from the filtering capabilities of Excel, I can quickly whittle down the list of 100K+ files to just the 202 .zip's in the software directory or below. When I do that, a VERY curious result appears: I haven't checked for sure, but it looks like every single file in the archive has been downloaded at least once, including of course many that are not linked from any of the web pages. Any good ideas how or why that could happen? What exactly counts as a download in these stats? BTW, there were only 11 such files with >1 download (in ~4 days), with musixtex.zip leading at 14, and musixflx.pkg.zip and pmx2613.zip tied for 2nd at 5. Curiously, the 3 bitmapped musixtex font files were each downloaded twice; I would have assumed those were completely obsolete. --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
I completely reinstalled Musix (including a texhash run) but this is all I get:
$$$
This is TeX, Version 3.1415926 (TeX Live 2010)
(./panofka.tex
(/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/musixtex/musixtex.tex
MusiXTeX(c) 1.15 <3 April 2011>
maxinstruments=6 max128beams=6 maxgroups=3 maxslurs=6 maxtrills=6
maxoctlines=6) (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/generic/pmx/pmx.tex
PMX, a Preprocessor for MusiXTeX, Version 2.602a <17 November 10>
) maxslurs=24
! No room for a new \dimen .
\ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
\fi
\alloc@ ...\advance \count 1#1by\@ne \ch@ck #1#4#2
\allocationnumber =\count ...
\body ...newskdim \csname e@z\roman@c@ \endcsname
\expandafter \noexpand@new...
\next ->\body
\let \next \iterate \else \let \next \relax \fi \next
\setmaxinstruments ...t@ <\maxinstruments \repeat
\expandafter \message \exp...
l.8 \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}
%
?
$$$
I have noticed that for some files the folder structure is altered. For example:
texmf-local/fonts/tfm/musixtex
seems to be nonexistent. For the new distribution the files are here:
texmf-local/fonts/tfm
Is this of any concern?
Philipp
Am 01.07.2011 um 17:17 schrieb Don Simons:
> That's a line I added in PMX 2.6+ specifically to work with MusiXTeX 1.15.
> It fails with earlier versions of musixtex. I assume by "killing" your
> compilation you mean that when you remove the line from the TeX file it then
> works OK. That behavior is consistent with not having properly upgraded to
> MusiXTeX 1.15. Please check your system to be sure there aren't any stray,
> older copies of musixtex.tex lurking somewhere higher up in the TeX search
> path, including your working directory. If that doesn't do it, please report
> back.
>
> --Don Simons
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
> Behalf Of
>> Philipp Neukel
>> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:04 AM
>> To: tex-music@tug.org
>> Subject: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and
> installing it, it
>> messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number Eight) to
> the Tex
>> File:
>>
>> $ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
>>
>> my PMX preamble looks like this:
>>
>> $$$
>>
>> 3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
>> 0 6 16 .2
>> %
>> Pianoforte
>> Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
>> %
>> btt
>> ./
>> Apr
>> h270m
>> w190m
>> \\input musixger\
>> \\setsign2{-2}\
>> %
>>
>> $$$
>>
>> I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills my
> TeX. What is
>> triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid this
> line or/and its
>> consequences?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Philipp
>> D-40472
>>
>> ---
>> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
>
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
That's a line I added in PMX 2.6+ specifically to work with MusiXTeX 1.15.
It fails with earlier versions of musixtex. I assume by "killing" your
compilation you mean that when you remove the line from the TeX file it then
works OK. That behavior is consistent with not having properly upgraded to
MusiXTeX 1.15. Please check your system to be sure there aren't any stray,
older copies of musixtex.tex lurking somewhere higher up in the TeX search
path, including your working directory. If that doesn't do it, please report
back.
--Don Simons
>-Original Message-
>From: tex-music-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On
Behalf Of
>Philipp Neukel
>Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:04 AM
>To: tex-music@tug.org
>Subject: [Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
>
>Hello,
>
>I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and
installing it, it
>messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number Eight) to
the Tex
>File:
>
>$ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
>
>my PMX preamble looks like this:
>
>$$$
>
>3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
>0 6 16 .2
>%
>Pianoforte
>Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
>%
>btt
>./
>Apr
>h270m
>w190m
>\\input musixger\
>\\setsign2{-2}\
>%
>
>$$$
>
>I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills my
TeX. What is
>triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid this
line or/and its
>consequences?
>
>Thanks,
>Philipp
>D-40472
>
>---
>TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
[Tex-music] Mysterious Line Number Eight
Hello,
I have a problem with PMX: After successfully compiling PMX 2613 and installing
it, it messes up with my sources: It adds a Line (which is ALWAYS Number Eight)
to the Tex File:
$ \setmaxslurs{24}\setmaxinstruments{24}%
my PMX preamble looks like this:
$$$
3 2 4 4 0 6 .25 -4
0 6 16 .2
%
Pianoforte
Clarinetto in Si\ppff b
%
btt
./
Apr
h270m
w190m
\\input musixger\
\\setsign2{-2}\
%
$$$
I would not mind this beautiful line, if it was of any good. But kills my TeX.
What is triggering it, why does it kill TeX (MusixTeX 1.15), how can I avoid
this line or/and its consequences?
Thanks,
Philipp
D-40472
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
