RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Brzezinski, Paul J]

Libapr.so ?  

Maybe in $APACHE_HOME/lib?

I *added* -L/-R switches to the linker-relevant lines in the Makefile.


--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enterprise Distributed Capabilities
EDS Corporation
248-265-8283


: -Original Message-
: From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 5:30 PM
: To: Tomcat Users List
: Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
: 
: 
: Hi all
: 
: I've been able to build mod_jk2 on MDK 7.2 using JK2 2.0.1 
: (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk
: 2/release/v2.0
: .1)
: 
: But I still get
: ...
: 
: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
: make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1
: make[1]: Quitte le répertoire 
: `/usr/local/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.1-src/jk/nat
: ive2/server/ap
: ache2'
: make: *** [jk2-build] Erreur 1
: 
: jkjni.so doesn't exists
: 
: Does this mean that I won't use sockets ?
: 
: Dom
: 
: - Original Message -
: From: "Dom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:47 PM
: Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
: 
: 
: > Sorry
: >
: > Linux MDK 7.2 w kernel 2.4.18
: > automake 1.4-p5
: > autoconf  2.54
: > libtool 1.4.2
: >
: > Doing :
: >
: ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs 
: --with-tomcat41=/usr/lo
: > cal/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14 
: > --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
: >
: > I get :
: > ...
: > checking for ranlib... ranlib
: > checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
: > checking whether ln -s works... yes
: > ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' Try 
: > `ltconfig --help' for more information.
: > configure: error: libtool configure failed
: >
: > I had replaced the stock MDK autoconf and libtool, cause 
: while making 
: > mod_jk2 : ...
: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
: > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
: > make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1
: >
: > But now it's worse, I'm lost
: >
: > Dom
: >
: > - Original Message -----
: > From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:43 PM
: > Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
: >
: >
: > >
: > > Someone might have a slight chance of answering your 
: question if you
: were
: > to
: > > be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when 
: > > trying
: the
: > > build.
: > >
: > > John
: > >
: > >
: > > > -Original Message-
: > > > From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
: > > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM
: > > > To: Tomcat Users List
: > > > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
: > > >
: > > >
: > > > Hi
: > > >
: > > > I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 
: together, but not 
: > > > Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 
: 4.1.12. I've 
: > > > got no problem on a RH 7.3.
: > > >
: > > > Why ?
: > > >
: > > > - Original Message -
: > > > From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM
: > > > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
: > > >
: > > >
: > > > > Hum,
: > > > >
: > > > > Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
: > > > > btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you 
: > > > > should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
: > > > >
: > > > >
: > > > >
: > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
: > > > release/v1.2.0
: > > > /doc/jk/aphowto.html
: > > > >
: > > > >
: > > > > --
: > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > > >
: > > > >
: > > > >
: > > >
: > > >
: > > > --
: > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > >
: > > --
: > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > For additional commands, e-mail:
: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > >
: > >
: > >
: >
: >
: > --
: > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > For additional commands, e-mail:
: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >
: >
: >
: 
: 
: --
: To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
: <mailto:tomcat-user-: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: For 
: additional commands, 
: e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: 




Paul J. Brzezinski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).vcf
Description: Binary data

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Dom]

Hi all

I've been able to build mod_jk2 on MDK 7.2 using JK2 2.0.1
(http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0
.1)

But I still get
...

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire
`/usr/local/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.1-src/jk/native2/server/ap
ache2'
make: *** [jk2-build] Erreur 1

jkjni.so doesn't exists

Does this mean that I won't use sockets ?

Dom

- Original Message -
From: "Dom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk


> Sorry
>
> Linux MDK 7.2 w kernel 2.4.18
> automake 1.4-p5
> autoconf  2.54
> libtool 1.4.2
>
> Doing :
>
./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs --with-tomcat41=/usr/lo
> cal/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14 --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
>
> I get :
> ...
> checking for ranlib... ranlib
> checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
> checking whether ln -s works... yes
> ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify'
> Try `ltconfig --help' for more information.
> configure: error: libtool configure failed
>
> I had replaced the stock MDK autoconf and libtool, cause while making
> mod_jk2 :
> ...
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1
>
> But now it's worse, I'm lost
>
> Dom
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:43 PM
> Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
>
>
> >
> > Someone might have a slight chance of answering your question if you
were
> to
> > be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when trying
the
> > build.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not
> > > Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12.
> > > I've got no problem on a RH 7.3.
> > >
> > > Why ?
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hum,
> > > >
> > > > Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> > > > btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system,
> > > > you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> > > release/v1.2.0
> > > /doc/jk/aphowto.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Dom]

Sorry

Linux MDK 7.2 w kernel 2.4.18
automake 1.4-p5
autoconf  2.54
libtool 1.4.2

Doing :
./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs --with-tomcat41=/usr/lo
cal/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14 --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs

I get :
...
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... yes
ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify'
Try `ltconfig --help' for more information.
configure: error: libtool configure failed

I had replaced the stock MDK autoconf and libtool, cause while making
mod_jk2 :
...
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1

But now it's worse, I'm lost

Dom

- Original Message -
From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:43 PM
Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk


>
> Someone might have a slight chance of answering your question if you were
to
> be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when trying the
> build.
>
> John
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not
> > Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12.
> > I've got no problem on a RH 7.3.
> >
> > Why ?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> >
> >
> > > Hum,
> > >
> > > Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> > > btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system,
> > > you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> > release/v1.2.0
> > /doc/jk/aphowto.html
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Turner, John]

Someone might have a slight chance of answering your question if you were to
be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when trying the
build.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not
> Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12.
> I've got no problem on a RH 7.3.
> 
> Why ?
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM
> Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> 
> 
> > Hum,
> >
> > Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> > btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system,
> > you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
> >
> >
> >
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> release/v1.2.0
> /doc/jk/aphowto.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Dom]

Hi

I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not
Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12.
I've got no problem on a RH 7.3.

Why ?

- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk


> Hum,
>
> Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system,
> you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
>
>
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0
/doc/jk/aphowto.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Henri Gomez]

 >As a matter of fact I have been building apache since
 >the dawn of it ;) Also I have been building/using
 >tomcat since it was a jserv module, in corporate
 >environments too. So the whole process is in my hands.

Ok, like me but since I've got a bad memory I put the
build process in a rpm spec file where I'm sure I could
find it for next release ;-)

 >I have a cluster of 4.0.4 running, with apache 2.0.39,
 >pretty good on my system.

Great

 >Thank you for the teasing, but I will appreciate it if
 >you have a helping tip too ;)

I give you the url of the jk 1.2.0 release documentation,
which should give you all information to build jk 1.2.0 for
Apache 2.0.42.

- get jk 1.2.0 tarball

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.0-src.tar.gz

- untar it

- go to jk/native directory

- use configure :

   ./configure --with-apxs=/your/path/to/apache2/apxs

- make the stuff

   make

- copy the mod_jk.so to apache 2 module dir

   cp apache-2.0/mod_jk.so /your/path/to/apache2/modules

-  Put in httpd.conf

   LoadModule jk_module /your/path/to/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
   JkWorkersFile /your/path/to/apache2/conf/workers.properties
   JkLogFile /your/path/to/apache2/logs/mod_jk.log
   JkLogLevelerror

   JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
   JkMount /servlet/*.jsp ajp13

   JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13
   JkMount /examples/servlet/*.jsp ajp13


You could find an example workers.properties in conf dir of tarball.

That's all.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Luminous Heart]

That is exactly my opinion, but did not want to start
a religious war about the validity of rpms :)

Thank you, John, for making my case.


--- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else
> decide where to put things
> on your machine, and how to configure your machine.
> You are trusting someone
> else to "do the right thing" every time.  Some
> people find that annoying and
> risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. ;)
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and
> mod_jk
> > 
> > 
> > Hum,
> > 
> > Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> > btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your
> system,
> > you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
> > 
> > 
> >
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> > release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> >
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Luminous Heart]

yes I built 2.0.42. What is the relation then?

--- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hum,
> 
> Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your
> system,
> you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
> 
> 
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Luminous Heart]

As a matter of fact I have been building apache since
the dawn of it ;) Also I have been building/using
tomcat since it was a jserv module, in corporate
environments too. So the whole process is in my hands.
Now that I wanted to experiment with Tomcat 4.1, I am
seeing this behavior. I was discouraged, a couple of
months ago, from using 4.1.x because it was in
pre-alpha then unstable beta. Now that it is released
I thought things should be better.

I have a cluster of 4.0.4 running, with apache 2.0.39,
pretty good on my system.

Thank you for the teasing, but I will appreciate it if
you have a helping tip too ;)

Regards,

--- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else
> decide where to put 
>  >things on your machine, and how to configure your
> machine. You are 
>  >trusting someone else to "do the right thing"
> every time.  Some people 
>  >find that annoying and risky, and prefer to make
> their own decisions. >;)
> 
> I understand that point and rpm packagers does their
> best to avoid any
> complication, for example my rpms for Apache 2.0,
> allow a coexistance
> with Apache 1.3 installed (diff conf dir, www dirs,
> lib dir..., listen 
> ports).
> 
> rpm is great when you are a newbie or when you have
> to duplicate a
> configuration on farms of machines and want so have
> a reproductible
> process.
> 
> And when an user goes with a customly built package
> like Apache 2.0.42,
> he should be prepared to also have to build himself
> the others packages,
> like jk ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Henri Gomez]

 >When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else decide where to put 
 >things on your machine, and how to configure your machine. You are 
 >trusting someone else to "do the right thing" every time.  Some people 
 >find that annoying and risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. >;)

I understand that point and rpm packagers does their best to avoid any
complication, for example my rpms for Apache 2.0, allow a coexistance
with Apache 1.3 installed (diff conf dir, www dirs, lib dir..., listen 
ports).

rpm is great when you are a newbie or when you have to duplicate a
configuration on farms of machines and want so have a reproductible
process.

And when an user goes with a customly built package like Apache 2.0.42,
he should be prepared to also have to build himself the others packages,
like jk ;-)





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Turner, John]

When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else decide where to put things
on your machine, and how to configure your machine. You are trusting someone
else to "do the right thing" every time.  Some people find that annoying and
risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. ;)

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> 
> 
> Hum,
> 
> Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
> btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system,
> you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :
> 
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/
> release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Matt Fury]

I know you all are talking about Linux or Unix based
but I've found an excellent site for Windows
Apache/Tomcat JK.

http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/

For future reference! :-)


--- Luminous Heart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I do not do rpms. They are too tidy for me ;)
> let us put it that way. Yes, I can safely say I
> tried
> almost every build of the connectors. I am running
> jdk1.4.1 though.
> 
> --- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   >httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with
> > this
> >   >version of Apache (found 20020612, need
> > 20020903).
> > 
> > Did you tried with one from JK 1.2.0 release ?
> > 
> >
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/rpms/
> > 
> > Since you're a Redhat user, may I recommand you to
> > get also the Apache
> > 2.0.42 rpm :
> > 
> > http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/
> > 
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> >
> 
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 


=

int myName() {
  cout << "-Matt Fury \n";
  return 0;
}


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Henri Gomez]

Hum,

Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange,
btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system,
you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 :


http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Luminous Heart]

Sorry, I do not do rpms. They are too tidy for me ;)
let us put it that way. Yes, I can safely say I tried
almost every build of the connectors. I am running
jdk1.4.1 though.

--- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with
> this
>   >version of Apache (found 20020612, need
> 20020903).
> 
> Did you tried with one from JK 1.2.0 release ?
> 
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/rpms/
> 
> Since you're a Redhat user, may I recommand you to
> get also the Apache
> 2.0.42 rpm :
> 
> http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Henri Gomez]

  >httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this
  >version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903).

Did you tried with one from JK 1.2.0 release ?

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/rpms/

Since you're a Redhat user, may I recommand you to get also the Apache
2.0.42 rpm :

http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/


Regards



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Robert L Sowders]

So if that binary didn't work then get this one.  Rename it to mod_jk.so 
and copy it over the one you already have.

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/i386/

rls




Luminous Heart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/02/2002 08:30 PM
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"

 
To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 
    Subject:    Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

You are right, it is rh Linux 7.1. Event the binaries
from johnturner.com did not work. Same error.

--- Robert L Sowders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First thing you do is let us know what OS you are
> using.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Luminous Heart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 10/01/2002 08:46 PM
> Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
> 
> 
> To: Tomcat Users List
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: 
> Subject:tomcat 4.1.12 with
> apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> 
> httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this
> version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903).
> Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
> 
> I tried compiling different mod_jk's from jakarta
> site, but still get the same error. I am running
> apache 42, new compile and trying to compile 4.1.12.
> What is the best way to compile mod_jk, knowing that
> my old mod_jk is not working here.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Luminous Heart]

You are right, it is rh Linux 7.1. Event the binaries
from johnturner.com did not work. Same error.

--- Robert L Sowders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First thing you do is let us know what OS you are
> using.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Luminous Heart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 10/01/2002 08:46 PM
> Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
> 
>  
> To: Tomcat Users List
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: 
> Subject:tomcat 4.1.12 with
> apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
> 
> httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this
> version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903).
> Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
> 
> I tried compiling different mod_jk's from jakarta
> site, but still get the same error. I am running
> apache 42, new compile and trying to compile 4.1.12.
> What is the best way to compile mod_jk, knowing that
> my old mod_jk is not working here.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

[Robert L Sowders]

First thing you do is let us know what OS you are using.





Luminous Heart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/01/2002 08:46 PM
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"

 
To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk

httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this
version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903).
Please contact the vendor for the correct version.

I tried compiling different mod_jk's from jakarta
site, but still get the same error. I am running
apache 42, new compile and trying to compile 4.1.12.
What is the best way to compile mod_jk, knowing that
my old mod_jk is not working here.

Thanks.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: