Re: [Toolserver-l] Output files
It doesn't work! my crons still make output files.
*"By the way, cronsub is deprecated in favor of qcronsub"*
I didn't understand this, how could I use qcronsub instead of my way?
2013/4/18 Platonides
> On 18/04/13 02:09, Avocato wrote:
> > Hello all. I use this way
> > <
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Submit.toolserver.org#resource_definition@script
> >
> > for running crons. I make a file named /something.sh /for example,
> > encluding the following:
> >
> > /#!/bin/sh
> > #$ -j y
> > #$ -o /dev/null
> > cd pywikipedia
> > python anyscript.py/
> >
> > Then, I put a cron like:
> > /00 21 * * * cronsub -s something % sh $HOME/something.sh/
> >
> > The problem is that I want my crons to stop producing output files at
> > "home" folder inside my account, I don't want it to produce outputs at
> > all. How can I do that?
>
> Remove the -s flag of cronsub. It is giving qsub the parameters -j y -o
> $HOME/${JOBNAME}.out and it seems to be overriding the script ones.
>
> So you would put just
> /00 21 * * * cronsub something % sh $HOME/something.sh/
>
> By the way, cronsub is deprecated in favor of qcronsub
>
> Cheers
>
>
> ___
> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> Posting guidelines for this list:
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
>
--
*User:Avocato--*
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
[Toolserver-l] Maintenance cassia s5-rr
Hello, I will move dewiki for cassia off the SAN back to the local storage. This will happen on Friday, 3rd May 1900-2100 UTC I will take this copy of s5-rr offline but due to the other copy of s5-rr you will probably not experience downtime but slower answers. Kind regards Marlen/nosy ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Maintenance: more disk space for s7
Hey, sorry wrong date for Wednesday - so its 24th April 1900-2200 UTC Kind regards Marlen/nosy ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
[Toolserver-l] Maintenance: more disk space for s7
Hello, I will add more disk space for s7 next Wednesday 23rd April 1900-2200 UTC I suppose to have completed in 1.5 hours. Kind regards Marlen/nosy ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
[Toolserver-l] Maintenance: moving data of s1-user / rosemary
Hello, s1-user / rosemary will quite soon run out of space. Thus I will move everything except enwiki itself onto a SAN partition. This will happen next Friday 26st Apr 1900 - 2200 UTC I suppose to have everything back online within one hour in this time frame. Please not that s1-user will not be available during the move. Kind regards, Marlen/nosy ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
[Toolserver-l] Draft online: Roadmap for the setup of Tool Labs and the migration from Toolserver
Hi all! As you know Wikimedia Deutschland has the mandate to create a roadmap for the availability of features on Wikimedia Labs / Tool Labs that are currently available on the Toolserver until the next membership assembly (May 25th). I have worked on this for the last weeks and now published a draft. I would like to get your feedback on this draft to make sure it is sound and nothing vital is missing. The current version is not final but hopefully very close to what will be presented at the membership assembly next month. The plan has been drafted in close cooperation with the responsible people at the Wikimedia Foundation. It still needs a final ok from them though. You can find the drafts at: English version: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Tool_Labs/Roadmap_en German version: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Tool_Labs/Roadmap_de To not spread out discussions too far please use the discussion pages of the above two pages for comments, suggestions and corrections. Cheers, Silke -- Silke Meyer Internes IT-Management und Projektmanagement Toolserver Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin Tel. (030) 219 158 260 http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
Waterfall the Anamorphic Development.
On Apr 19, 2013 4:14 AM, "Patricia Pintilie"
wrote:
> Ok so how about we recocnize what the overal goal is first . Then
> establish the point that its trying to convay. Only then can we meet in the
> middle and set a plan in motion. I can only assist when a plan of action is
> clear with a definite plan without it im lost on where to begin. It seems
> as if im doing my natural instinct research then I get mail from the people
> im reading about... Very interesting this is because im left to think my
> mind is linked to the problems at hand. TS is my old signature, my server
> os will pull up my IP searches. Which leads me to believe this is why I am
> always being brought up in the middle of these outstanding conversations
> you guys are having lol. Please send detailed instructions as to how I can
> help,there should be a file known as Mila.eu also known as ro.eula. Find it
> and run whatever it has, thanks.
> -patiently waiting your responce.
> -MilaStarX-TS
> On Apr 19, 2013 3:29 AM, "Platonides" wrote:
>
>> On 19/04/13 01:19, DaB. wrote:
>> > as you may know there is a rev_text_id-field in the revision-table.
>> This field
>> > points to the text-table where the actual text is – or should be.
>> Because the
>> > WMF doesn’t store the text here, but only a pointer
>> ("DB://cluster25/11458305"
>> > for example). If you query different wikis you will see that most of
>> them point
>> > to the same cluster or one with a number short by. That says me (and I
>> was
>> > also told so before) that all text of all wmf-projects are stored
>> together.
>> > The task would now to separate wikidata from the rest – but the
>> storage-area
>> > has no clue from where a text is which makes the separating very hard.
>> And
>> > there is another problem: Deleted texts are also in this area, so even
>> more
>> > filtering would be needed.
>> > I very doubt that this situation will change at the TS and I also doubt
>> that
>> > it will be different for WikiLabs. So I guess your best bet is the API
>> here.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> > DaB.
>>
>> I think the only hope would be if wikidata was stored under its own
>> cluster (for easier differenciation) and at least one server of that
>> group (the master?) only had that (so toolserver could get its binlogs).
>>
>> ___
>> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
>> Posting guidelines for this list:
>> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
>
>
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
Sorry, but your mail doesn't make much sense. El 19/04/13 11:14, Patricia Pintilie escribió: > Ok so how about we recocnize what the overal goal is first . Then > establish the point that its trying to convay. Only then can we meet in > the middle and set a plan in motion. I can only assist when a plan of > action is clear with a definite plan without it im lost on where to > begin. It seems as if im doing my natural instinct research then I get > mail from the people im reading about... Very interesting this is > because im left to think my mind is linked to the problems at hand. TS > is my old signature, my server os will pull up my IP searches. Which > leads me to believe this is why I am always being brought up in the > middle of these outstanding conversations you guys are having lol. > Please send detailed instructions as to how I can help,there should be a > file known as Mila.eu also known as ro.eula. Find it and run whatever it > has, thanks. > -patiently waiting your responce. > -MilaStarX-TS TS was being used in this thread as an abbreviature of ToolServer. This mailing list is about the Wikimedia Toolserver, so no wonder that it's mentioned a lot here. :) I don't know if you have a toolserver account, or even if you're a wikimedian. I don't know what you refer to with “my server os will pull up my IP searches” nor where is that “file known as Mila.eu also known as ro.eula” supposed to be. If you were asking for someone to make a query for you in the toolserver, try including the request in the email, or at least a link to what you want. Best regards ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
Ok so how about we recocnize what the overal goal is first . Then establish
the point that its trying to convay. Only then can we meet in the middle
and set a plan in motion. I can only assist when a plan of action is clear
with a definite plan without it im lost on where to begin. It seems as if
im doing my natural instinct research then I get mail from the people im
reading about... Very interesting this is because im left to think my mind
is linked to the problems at hand. TS is my old signature, my server os
will pull up my IP searches. Which leads me to believe this is why I am
always being brought up in the middle of these outstanding conversations
you guys are having lol. Please send detailed instructions as to how I can
help,there should be a file known as Mila.eu also known as ro.eula. Find it
and run whatever it has, thanks.
-patiently waiting your responce.
-MilaStarX-TS
On Apr 19, 2013 3:29 AM, "Platonides" wrote:
> On 19/04/13 01:19, DaB. wrote:
> > as you may know there is a rev_text_id-field in the revision-table. This
> field
> > points to the text-table where the actual text is – or should be.
> Because the
> > WMF doesn’t store the text here, but only a pointer
> ("DB://cluster25/11458305"
> > for example). If you query different wikis you will see that most of
> them point
> > to the same cluster or one with a number short by. That says me (and I
> was
> > also told so before) that all text of all wmf-projects are stored
> together.
> > The task would now to separate wikidata from the rest – but the
> storage-area
> > has no clue from where a text is which makes the separating very hard.
> And
> > there is another problem: Deleted texts are also in this area, so even
> more
> > filtering would be needed.
> > I very doubt that this situation will change at the TS and I also doubt
> that
> > it will be different for WikiLabs. So I guess your best bet is the API
> here.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > DaB.
>
> I think the only hope would be if wikidata was stored under its own
> cluster (for easier differenciation) and at least one server of that
> group (the master?) only had that (so toolserver could get its binlogs).
>
> ___
> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> Posting guidelines for this list:
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
Sounds fine, but will it be possible to join the data with data from other tables and other projects? This joins are the base for a lot of tools on toolserver and I#m not sure how good joins on application level will work. BTW: With the project Templatetiger we already handle tons of informations of infoboxes in MYSQL on Toolserver, all these data are highly redundant because we support a lot of languages. So there should be enough space on toolserver in midterm. But I also think that labs are the right place to start such a project. Greetings Tim Am 19.04.2013 10:37, schrieb Magnus Manske: FWIW, I have implemented a query-able stand-alone web server that keeps all of the wikidata property-item-links in memory. This uses the wikidata dumps which appear to be rather frequent. I'll try do deploy a test version on wikilabs (once I figure out how all that works); it seems to be more favourable to such services than the toolserver. ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
Hello, Postrgesql starts now to support also JSON, so we should try to find a way to bring Wikidata available for us and I would prefer to use furthermore SQL. One way could be minutely diff-files, that's the way OpenStreetMap use. Alternatively we could use API for each updated article. Every central service is better than let's fighting everyone with the problem alone. I think the support of hierarchical informations was the key to use JSON instead of a key-value store. A point that I can understand. Greetings Tim Am 19.04.2013 00:43, schrieb Daniel Schwen: if these JSON-data is stored where the normal wiki-text is, it is imposable To my understanding it is. for us to replicate it: Because we have no access to these wmf-servers, there IMO that was a questionable design decision. JSON plaintext storage in SQL is shoehorning a do-it-yourself object store onto a classical RDBMS. Postgres at least has hstore. This may be even a genuine usecase for one of those hipster databases (noSQL like mongdb etc.). But who knows what points were taken into consideration when making this decision. would be no way to separate Wikidata from the rest I don't understand why separating plaintext storage between different projects would be an issue. Is it all lumped into one storage "namespace"? I'm sure nobody at Wikimedia would be the least bit motivated to make this data available to the toolserver, but maybe it will be usable in labs. Otherwise it would be quite a waste of a great opportunity. and/or we have not enough disc-space. If you can separate it out I seriously doubt that wikidata would require storage any where near as large in magnitude as the other wikimedia projects (at least in the mid-term) ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
FWIW, I have implemented a query-able stand-alone web server that keeps all
of the wikidata property-item-links in memory. This uses the wikidata dumps
which appear to be rather frequent. I'll try do deploy a test version on
wikilabs (once I figure out how all that works); it seems to be more
favourable to such services than the toolserver.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Platonides wrote:
> On 19/04/13 01:19, DaB. wrote:
> > as you may know there is a rev_text_id-field in the revision-table. This
> field
> > points to the text-table where the actual text is – or should be.
> Because the
> > WMF doesn’t store the text here, but only a pointer
> ("DB://cluster25/11458305"
> > for example). If you query different wikis you will see that most of
> them point
> > to the same cluster or one with a number short by. That says me (and I
> was
> > also told so before) that all text of all wmf-projects are stored
> together.
> > The task would now to separate wikidata from the rest – but the
> storage-area
> > has no clue from where a text is which makes the separating very hard.
> And
> > there is another problem: Deleted texts are also in this area, so even
> more
> > filtering would be needed.
> > I very doubt that this situation will change at the TS and I also doubt
> that
> > it will be different for WikiLabs. So I guess your best bet is the API
> here.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > DaB.
>
> I think the only hope would be if wikidata was stored under its own
> cluster (for easier differenciation) and at least one server of that
> group (the master?) only had that (so toolserver could get its binlogs).
>
> ___
> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> Posting guidelines for this list:
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
>
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Wikidata tables
On 19/04/13 01:19, DaB. wrote:
> as you may know there is a rev_text_id-field in the revision-table. This
> field
> points to the text-table where the actual text is – or should be. Because the
> WMF doesn’t store the text here, but only a pointer
> ("DB://cluster25/11458305"
> for example). If you query different wikis you will see that most of them
> point
> to the same cluster or one with a number short by. That says me (and I was
> also told so before) that all text of all wmf-projects are stored together.
> The task would now to separate wikidata from the rest – but the storage-area
> has no clue from where a text is which makes the separating very hard. And
> there is another problem: Deleted texts are also in this area, so even more
> filtering would be needed.
> I very doubt that this situation will change at the TS and I also doubt that
> it will be different for WikiLabs. So I guess your best bet is the API here.
>
> Sincerely,
> DaB.
I think the only hope would be if wikidata was stored under its own
cluster (for easier differenciation) and at least one server of that
group (the master?) only had that (so toolserver could get its binlogs).
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
