[Bug 1492762] Re: TCL error in autodock
Confirmed and construtively communicated to upstream. ** Package changed: autodock-vina (Ubuntu) => autodocktools (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: autodocktools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: autodocktools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Steffen Möller (moeller-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492762 Title: TCL error in autodock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autodocktools/+bug/1492762/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1293487] Re: Traceback on application launch
Hello, please kindly try again once the just uploaded 2014-April version hits Ubuntu. Do you get the same report when starting runAdt from the autodocktools package? The change of directory should not be required to runPmv. Best, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293487 Title: Traceback on application launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-pmv/+bug/1293487/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053326] Re: apparent regression of 685476
Hello, I just checked in the recently uploaded version 1.5.7~rc1+cvs.20140424 and that particular line is commented out upstream already, as it seems. SM ** Changed in: mgltools-viewerframework (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053326 Title: apparent regression of 685476 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-viewerframework/+bug/1053326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1131211] Re: Please sync autodocksuite to version in experimental
It is in by now. Many thanks! ** Changed in: autodocksuite (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131211 Title: Please sync autodocksuite to version in experimental To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autodocksuite/+bug/1131211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1131211] [NEW] Please sync autodocksuite to version in experimental
Public bug reported: Hello, we have recently updated autodock in Debian. Because of the freeze we hid it in experimental, just please find and forward the package to Ubuntu. Many thanks and regards, Steffen ** Affects: autodocksuite (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131211 Title: Please sync autodocksuite to version in experimental To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autodocksuite/+bug/1131211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt
The original md5 error reported in this thread I have just seen again with 7.0.34. The error sems to be associated with tests for the amount of disk space. I could well assume some concurrency issue to play a role since both the original reporter and me seem to be running many cores in parallel - 12 or 24 here. Rosetta is best at causing issue over here. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968021 Title: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/968021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1009536] Re: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home
On 08/22/2012 04:51 PM, Jonathan Harker wrote: Promise I won't make any more noise, but Locutus: I can happily report that your PPA boinc-app-seti is now running fine on one of my 12.04 machines, but it needed a reboot to fix the app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of SETI@home Enhanced error message :-) My hunch is that invoking Reset project for SETI after installation of boinc-app-seti would have been sufficient. @Jonathan, please skim though wiki.debian.org/BOINC . That is (not unsurpringly) a bit Debian-centric, but either way some information on how to work with boinc-app-seti could be put more prominently, now that it is in such a nice shape again. If you have ideas - go for it. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009536 Title: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009536] Re: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home
Hello, after rereading about that SETI issue I have to admit that my
answer was wrong. Jonathan was right by pointing out that the SETI
scientific app seeks older symbolic libraries.
This what it should look like
$ ldd `dpkg -L boinc-app-seti | grep setiathome`
linux-vdso.so.1 = (0x7fff73b71000)
libboinc_api.so.7 = /usr/lib/libboinc_api.so.7 (0x7f1d8825f000)
libfftw3f.so.3 = /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3f.so.3
(0x7f1d87e5c000)
libssl.so.1.0.0 = /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
(0x7f1d87bfd000)
libcrypto.so.1.0.0 = /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
(0x7f1d87819000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x7f1d87512000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7f1d8728f000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x7f1d87079000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x7f1d86e5d000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f1d86ad5000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x7f1d868d1000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7f1d866ba000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f1d8849a000)
$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libboinc_api.so.7
boinc-dev: /usr/lib/libboinc_api.so.7
$ dpkg -l boinc-dev|grep boinc-dev|awk '{print $2,$3}'
boinc-dev 7.0.27+dfsg-5
This is the boinc client from Debian Wheezy (testing) and boinc-app-seti
just uploaded to sid (unstable). 7.0.27 should work for about
everything. 7.0.33 is still in the Debian new queue, with the ftpmaters
uncertain if they should let it in because of an uncertain transition to
testing in those last freeze days. I am still hoping for it. 7.0.34 is
in the git repository for the unfrozen Ubuntu to adopt. Works for me.
Steffen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009536
Title:
Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009536] Re: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home
@Jonathan with his SETI limitation - this is because SETI thinks that it has sent you enough workunits for that day. That limit will go up once the client works and workunits have been validated successfully. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009536 Title: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1009536] Re: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home
I suggest to change projects until locutus' PPA features boinc-app-seti -3 from unstable. Cheers, Steffen Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On August 21, 2012 3:19:24 PM Jonathan Harker 1009...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: It can't be just in proposed if I installed 12.04 last Friday and I ended up with version 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu0.12.04 as I noted in #31 since I don't have the proposed repo enabled. Steffen: sounds like it's more than just that: Message from server: Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of SETI@home Enhanced. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009536 Title: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009536 Title: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1009536] Re: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home
Hi Jonathan, On 08/20/2012 09:40 AM, Jonathan Harker wrote: Hi there, I am currently running a new installed 12.04 LTS, with the following packages: dpkg -l|grep boinc ii boinc 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu0.12.04.1 metapackage for the BOINC client and the manager ii boinc-app-seti 5.13+cvs20060510-7ubuntu1 SETI@home application for the BOINC client ii boinc-client 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu0.12.04.1 core client for the BOINC distributed computing infrastructure ii boinc-dev 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu0.12.04.1 development files to build applications for BOINC projects ii boinc-manager 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu0.12.04.1 GUI to control and monitor the BOINC core client ii boinc-nvidia-cuda 7.0.27+dfsg-5ubuntu0.12.04.1 metapackage for CUDA-savvy BOINC client and manager With the following result, as recorded by SETI@Home here: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2570285385 core_client_version7.0.27/core_client_version ![CDATA[ message process exited with code 127 (0x7f, -129) /message stderr_txt ../../projects/setiathome.berkeley.edu/setiathome_enhanced: error while loading shared libraries: libboinc_api.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /stderr_txt ]] So this bug does not seem to be Fixed in all situations. I have to apologise for this one. The SETI client was already built against 7.0.33 which ships that library. 7.0.31 should already feature it. Debian unstable already has 7.0.33 in its archive, please take it from there or there will instructions from others on where to find it. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009536 Title: Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935038] Re: ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf in precise
Please try again with the latest BALL (-4) in unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935038 Title: ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ball/+bug/935038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 941483] Re: BOINC apps need to be rebuilt against BOINC 7
On 08/14/2012 06:49 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: I'm building right now the new boinc-app-seti rev-123 in my ppa [1] this release should fix this bug and the computation error bug. [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/boinc This version just also made it to Debian unstable. The previously reported crash we accredit to recent BOINC more than to the SETI app these days. Please report how it goes. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941483 Title: BOINC apps need to be rebuilt against BOINC 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-milkyway/+bug/941483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 128357] Re: boinc does not idle with mouse movement
On 07/08/2012 07:56 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: On 07/08/2012 11:18 AM, Matt Dittloff wrote: I'm using 12.04 Precise, BOINC version 7.0.24, and it does now seem to stop computation. However, now I'm having the opposite problem. It doesn't seem to detect that the computer is idle to be able to resume computation. I have while computer is in use unchecked, and I have if the computer has been idle for 2 minutes. My work units switch to a status of Suspended - computer is in use. I now step back from my computer and wait 2 minutes. My work units do not resume computation. What happens when waiting for 10 minutes? How have you specified it in the preferences? I think the idle detection is still broken. Now, instead of not detecting computer active to stop computation, it's now not detecting computer idle to resume computation. Hm. The idea is to disturb you as little as possible. Is something else running, possibly? Maybe one of those astray firefox instances or so? Update - it seems like I can confirm this with 7.0.30. Anybody else? Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128357 Title: boinc does not idle with mouse movement To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/128357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1022232] Re: installing boinc-client requires too much dependencies
On 07/09/2012 01:49 PM, Ace Suares wrote:
I think boinc-manager may need some more graphic stuff, since it needs X, but
boinc-client is all commandline stuff.
Except for the idle detection, for which the boinc-client needs a particular X
library - xss, if I am not erroneous. This was the
original request quite some time back.
The original poster put is as a question on launchpad, I made it a bug.
I am 100% sure other packages like git do not install so much nonsense.
I am 100% sure that a command-line only package doesnt' require so much libs.
I agree that it is too much that is drawn with it. I am not sure for the moment
if this is truly the fault of the boinc-client,
which only depends on
${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
libboinc (= ${binary:Version}),
python (= 2.3),
adduser,
ca-certificates
not truly recalling why it depends on python, actually, and the boinc-library
depends on
${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
which seems reasonable to me.
Now, in the real world, this ${shlibs:Depends} are becoming where the symbols
in the binaries of those packages depend on, which is
http://packages.debian.org/sid/boinc-client (and not so bad)
So, from my side I tend to think this bug to be ubuntu-specific or due to some
dependency to have become crazy. Hence my initial
suggestion to investigate what might happen when only the true dependencies and
not the recommended packages are inspected.
Steffen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022232
Title:
installing boinc-client requires too much dependencies
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1022232/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1022232] [NEW] installing boinc-client requires too much dependencies
This is hilarious, indeed. No idea what is going on at the moment. What is it like when you run apt-get install --no-install-recommends boinc-client ? And what does apt-get install --no-install-recommends boinc-manager say? Anyway, I do not see any link to ntfsprogs or odbcinst either way. What if you install something very different, like git or so. Or gitk ? Do you see such a swarm of packages, too? Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022232 Title: installing boinc-client requires too much dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1022232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 128357] Re: boinc does not idle with mouse movement
On 07/08/2012 11:18 AM, Matt Dittloff wrote: I'm using 12.04 Precise, BOINC version 7.0.24, and it does now seem to stop computation. However, now I'm having the opposite problem. It doesn't seem to detect that the computer is idle to be able to resume computation. I have while computer is in use unchecked, and I have if the computer has been idle for 2 minutes. My work units switch to a status of Suspended - computer is in use. I now step back from my computer and wait 2 minutes. My work units do not resume computation. What happens when waiting for 10 minutes? How have you specified it in the preferences? I think the idle detection is still broken. Now, instead of not detecting computer active to stop computation, it's now not detecting computer idle to resume computation. Hm. The idea is to disturb you as little as possible. Is something else running, possibly? Maybe one of those astray firefox instances or so? Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128357 Title: boinc does not idle with mouse movement To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/128357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1008397] [NEW] ressources partitioning does not work correct
Hello, On 06/04/2012 10:58 AM, LAZA wrote: Public bug reported: First: I crunch for over four years with BOINC and did not change the project resources since months. Nice to hear. I did a fresh installation of Precise from alternate CD and added BOINC per Synaptic. Version 7.0.25 didn't work for me so i installed the 7.0.27+dfsg-3.1fromhttp://ppa.launchpad.net/trekcaptainusa- tw/boinc/ubuntu Have not heard of that one. In this version, the resources partitioning (which isn't changed for a very long time) IMHO between my three projects is broken! World Community Grid15292,12% QMC@home 9 5,45% eon24 2,42% Over the last months (before reinstallation, with Xubuntu 11.04 and 11.10 and the BOINC packages from Synaptic) the projects average points in the statistics were about: WCG 750-900 QMC around 100 eon2 under 20 Since the installation of the new BOINC the WGC got not enough work (there was enough, i think) the average points dropped down to now 400, while QMC is now higher than 420 and eon2 from below 20 to now 220! So in my opinion something has been changed from BOINC 6.12.34 to 7.0.x so that the resources partitioning is not correct calculated. Xubuntu 12.04 BOINC 7.0.27+dfsg-3.1 Linux xubuntu2 3.2.0-25-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 23 20:30:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: boinc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New This problem is beyond me, I must admit. I also found that e.g. Rosetta is pretty bad at keeping up with competing projects. This is mostly because of a very restrictive policy towards server contacts from what I observe. This is something for upstream, I presume. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008397 Title: ressources partitioning does not work correct To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1008397/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 941483] Re: BOINC apps need to be rebuilt against BOINC 7
On 05/29/2012 07:00 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: Hi everybody, based on Daniel's hint I created a boinc-app-seti project and packaged it in my ppa [1] This is almost based on boinc-app-seti directly taken from debian's git [2] and boinc taken from debian (just two or three modification to make it build) I don't know status of boinc-app-seti, it's changing so fast, Steffen is pushing patches almost all the day :) so could anybody give it a try? [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/boinc [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc-app-seti.git I am a bit on a trip these days to have those shared libraries established more. The motivation is that we have servers here with 24 cores (12 real ones x 2 for hyperthreading) and I would very much like to see memory consumption decreased. Also, this would be quite a difference that our packaging could make this way, I think, especially for those who keep the app in memory when the computer is used. It is only the very latest 7.0.28 version of boinc that offers those shared libraries. But SETI is somehow incompatible with that version of boinc, only working fine with 7.0.27. So, if you have branched from the -2 version of boinc-app-seti and if using the 7.0.27 boinc client's -dev package, everything should be fine. Best, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941483 Title: BOINC apps need to be rebuilt against BOINC 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-milkyway/+bug/941483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 377360] Re: setiathome_enhanced crashed with SIGSEGV in vfprintf()
On 05/27/2012 07:13 PM, Daniel Hahler wrote: According to Steffen this is assumed to be fixed in version 6.12 of the package, which is available in Ubuntu Quantal (development release). ** Changed in: boinc-app-seti (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released 6.12 is working fine over here on two different machines, indeed. Just, please go for the 6.12... -2 version that is on its way to the Debian archive. The -1 version does not auto-install properly. Thanks and regards, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377360 Title: setiathome_enhanced crashed with SIGSEGV in vfprintf() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/377360/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 941483] Re: Missing libraries or wrong linkage
Hi Daniel, On 05/27/2012 07:08 PM, Daniel Hahler wrote: I am uploading backports for Precise, Oneiric and Lucid to the testing PPA at https://launchpad.net/~pkg-boinc/+archive/testing . Once I get positive feedback I might upload/copy it to the normal PPA, too. About getting it fixed in Ubuntu directly, I think it just needs to be rebuilt / re-uploaded. And from doing so in a Precise pbuilder that seems to be the case. While at it, it could make sense to go with the latest release (6.12~svn1305-1, instead of 5.13+cvs20060510-7ubuntu1) directly. The Ubuntu delta is: boinc-app-seti (5.13+cvs20060510-7ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * debian/rules: add include directories to fix FTBFS. * Rebuild gets rid of openssl0.9.8 binary dependency. -- Ilya Barygin bary...@gmail.com Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:15:11 +0400 The 6.12 boinc-app-seti package in Debian addressed all that. Just, the version -1 is not installing itself correctly. Version -2 (in git and on its way to the Debian archives) has this fixed by Guo Yixuan. Trying to build Debian's version in a Precise pbuilder fails, presumely the include directories are missing. I think the Ubuntu patch might be the following: CXXFLAGS += -I/usr/include/boinc CXXFLAGS += -I/usr/include/boinc/lib Steffen, why is this not necessary in Debian? I think that BOINC just at some point changed underneath and the boinc-app-seti package was just not taken care of. It has now seen its first patches since somewhen in 2008 or so. It is a pity I was not aware of Ilya and those patches. Now we need some more such good souls also for the milkyway app. Apart from that I wonder what the meaning of boinc-app-seti is - what is the difference from attaching to the SETI project via BOINC itself? I do not know about what compiler etc was used for the official clients. Having it all local, everyone can optimise for the machine available, i.e. with compilation flags and even with patches. But more interesting to me is the support of all the non-standard platforms like ARM that we are about to see more and more. It is also a bit of a philosophical question. E.g., I heard voices that do object running anything they do not know the source available for inspection. And it is education. And communication, like, whatever uncertain it is for them to eventually find something, Debian/Ubuntu ease to submit the one or other patch, and if it is only a typo, to become a part of it. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941483 Title: BOINC apps need to be rebuilt against BOINC 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-milkyway/+bug/941483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1004685] Re: Sync boinc-app-seti 6.12~svn1305-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
On 05/26/2012 08:17 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: ** Changed in: boinc-app-seti (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed Hello, it builds all fine, and runs all fine on my machine, but Guo Yixuan has found it all to segfault for him. This needs some further investigation ... Any other early adopters of this package please kindly contact us for an exchance of experiences. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004685 Title: Sync boinc-app-seti 6.12~svn1305-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/1004685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt
On 05/22/2012 03:05 PM, LeForgeron wrote: Others are working fine too (ABC Collatz). No regression on Einstein (GPU only), milkyway(GPU only) nor sudoku(CPU). Fine for me. I experienced that once, too. It was with WorldCommunityGrid, if I am not erroneous. And it is a lllooong time ago. Let us collect a bit how many of us are experiencing this. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968021 Title: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/968021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 941483] Re: Missing libraries or wrong linkage
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:18:56 - Von: LocutusOfBorg costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 941483] Re: Missing libraries or wrong linkage A new version is going to be released in debian soon (6.12). Please take it directly from http://master.dermacloud.uni-luebeck.de/~moeller/oliver The nice weather outside I presume to delay the upload a bit. It should just work fine. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941483 Title: Missing libraries or wrong linkage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/941483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 941483] Re: Missing libraries or wrong linkage
BOINC-app-seti was just uploaded to Debian unstable while I made those weather jokes. Many thanks, Thorsten. Loctus, Daniel, could you address that to find its way to the older Ubuntu releases, please? Now I would need someone to address that for backports.debian.org. Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:36:26 - Von: Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: Re: [Bug 941483] Re: Missing libraries or wrong linkage Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:18:56 - Von: LocutusOfBorg costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 941483] Re: Missing libraries or wrong linkage A new version is going to be released in debian soon (6.12). Please take it directly from http://master.dermacloud.uni-luebeck.de/~moeller/oliver The nice weather outside I presume to delay the upload a bit. It should just work fine. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941483 Title: Missing libraries or wrong linkage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/941483/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941483 Title: Missing libraries or wrong linkage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/941483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 377360] Re: setiathome_enhanced crashed with SIGSEGV in vfprintf()
On 05/20/2012 02:11 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: Hi sorry for the delay, do you still have this problem? Since 6.12 will soon hit the archives, I suggest to close this report. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377360 Title: setiathome_enhanced crashed with SIGSEGV in vfprintf() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/377360/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1001168] Re: crashes when trying to add projects
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sat, 19 May 2012 10:53:57 - Von: LAZA 1001...@bugs.launchpad.net An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 1001168] Re: crashes when trying to add projects @LocutusOfBorg: Yeah, you right! After a reboot today it works... - but the problem with the menu bar is back (seems to be a problem with the full screen mode; after minimize and maximise the window the menu bar is back and visible) Any change of the window size fixes that - until you add another project :-/ Upstream has no idea why this happens. So, any wxWidget affectionado please help out. If i try to use the new category push down menu, BOINC crashes again. This is something upstream. Reported, fixed, resurfaced. Without this i was able to add my 5 projects and try now to crunch some WUs... BOINC 7.0.27 (x86) Excellent. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001168 Title: crashes when trying to add projects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/1001168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1001168] Re: crashes when trying to add projects
On 05/18/2012 02:48 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: I'm experiencing the same problem, so this is not fixed afaics, I'm looking for a clean upstream version to look if the problem is due to a bad patch in ubuntu/debian system. Something is wrong in that add project. That much we know. Amazingly, the with --enable-debug set during compilation, the dialog box behaves differently, i.e. for me it crashes even before opening. I have directly informed upstream about it. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001168 Title: crashes when trying to add projects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1001168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:54:19 - Von: Thomas Ward tew...@trekweb.org An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug I confirmed with MOTUs and the archives that the version from Debian is imported already. You can just install it in Quantal. The Bad patch is in the package, No, it is not. so the package'll need ubuntu-only changes, This should not be required. And whenever there happen to be additional requirements for Ubuntu, please forward them to our shared git archive so they go through Debian. I'll work with the MOTUs on that, but I'll need a summary of why that patch is bad (i dont have the time to search through 144 comments :P) :o) I consider the issue closed. Something we should now address together is the backporting to releases older than Precise with the notify 0.5 library (now at 0.7) . I will contact Daniel and Locutus about it. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Ah! I need to invest the github repository, I presume. Locutus checks out from there and apparently some adjustment of mine with the latest updates of BOINC has not made it back into the remote git repositoryor something like it. What has found entry to the Debian archive comes from my local repository .. and that apparently just builds. Cheers, Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 13 May 2012 20:45:54 - Von: Thomas Ward tew...@trekweb.org An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug That was the confusion, because Locutus referred to a different patch. On May 13, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Dave xclusive...@gmail.com wrote: Just for clarification. I believe that patch Thomas refers to was believed to be causing issues building the package for Ubuntu. The patch found to cause the computation error was moreinformativeappstart.patch or something like that. On May 13, 2012 3:25 PM, Thomas Ward tew...@trekweb.org wrote: Steffen, the patch reported to have the problem, the 'parse_issues.patch' exists in the Quantal package, and the Debian package (I dissected the package myself, its still there). Backporting to older than Precise may be a tiny bit difficult, but before I help out wiht the backports to Oneiric and earlier, it has to be backported to Precise. I'm working on the paperwork now, but i have to finish fixing my dev environment. Once I fix my development environment, i'll test a no- changes backport to Precise, and then from there work my way onto Oneiric. Natty is going out when Quantal gets released, so I will look into backporting to that, but the backport priority order on that for me is as follows: 1) Precise 2) Oneiric 3) Natty 4) Lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug Status in “boinc” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Hi. Repository versions 7.0.24, (I assume 7.0.25) and 7.0.26 have a known bug which affects users with various hardware running Ubuntu 12.04. The bug makes the boinc software unable to process any work- units. This is a known bug by a growing group of S@H Boinc users running Ubuntu 12.04 and other Debain variants. As soon as there is a version out which overcomes this bug, the repository package may want to be changed. Thanks. [edit] it seems this bug is only caused by the repository installs of Boinc. When one installs Boinc from the Berkeley website the issue does not exist. Also, the bug only seems to exist for seti@home users, apparently all other projects are unaffected? (I'm now curious it may affect Quake Catcher Network) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug Status in “boinc” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Hi. Repository versions 7.0.24, (I assume 7.0.25) and 7.0.26 have a known bug which affects users with various hardware running Ubuntu 12.04. The bug makes the boinc software unable to process any work- units. This is a known bug by a growing group of S@H Boinc users running Ubuntu 12.04 and other Debain variants. As soon as there is a version out which overcomes this bug, the repository package may want to be changed. Thanks. [edit] it seems this bug is only caused by the repository installs of Boinc. When one installs Boinc from the Berkeley website the issue does not exist. Also, the bug only seems to exist for seti@home users, apparently all other projects are unaffected? (I'm now curious it may affect Quake Catcher Network) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, yes, and I had one report from Debian in the meantime, too, who had already confirmed this version to be fine with him (and SETI). Cheers, Steffen debian/changelog for the version being synced to quantal (notice where it closes this bug, which is number 991179): boinc (7.0.27+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low * Now truly reconstituting compatibility with SETI (Closes: #672328, lp: #991179). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/10/2012 06:48 AM, Rocky37 wrote: Just checked for updates and was surprised to find 7.0.27 Many thanks to you all for this wonderful fix -- Hugs to all Hey, great! Nice to see you happy. Thanks also from my side to Lotus, Dave and the folks behind the PPA build demons. Is it working for everyone? The upload to Debian unstable has that patch in that has caused the trouble for Ubuntu. But at least on my machine all the prior problematic projects do work with it. This would be somewhat in line with the late observation in 12.04. So, even when I think that we have not understood everything about this bug, yet, let's go ahead. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/10/2012 06:19 AM, Thomas Ward wrote: 7.0.26 isn't in Debian, so I'd have to poke around with the MOTUs to get that into Quantal, if not take the source and repackage it for quantal- proposed. Once Locutus can confirm whether or not 7.0.27 builds in Quantal, I'll go poke the MOTUs. I should point out, though, that since 7.0.26 is not packaged in Debian, they may not accept it, that's their decision. 7.0.27 is now in unstable. Just, the problem appearing with Ubuntu is not appearing on my machine, and if I am not erroneous then I had that patch in the version that was uploaded. Yes, it is in: dpkg-source: info: applying MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch as seen from the build logs. This was a bit stupid of mine, but I had not believed in the issue to be located in there at the time. What I can offer is to have yet another version uploaded to that does not have that patch included. I just saw that BOINC has an issue with gcc 4.7, so I need to address that anyway: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=boinc This you can then adopt directly for Precise. Would that be acceptable? If 7.0.27 will build in Quantal, this will save some time and effort. If it does not, then I'll take a look at Locutus' package of 7.0.26, and talk to the MOTUs to see if we can get that into Quantal (I'll do the uploading if necessary), and then see if we can't SRU that into Precise. The version currently shipping with Ubuntu has issues with NVidia cards with 2GB of memory. Since those cards will become increasingly popular, I strongly suggest to move away from 7.0.24. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, On 05/10/2012 04:05 PM, Thomas Ward wrote: New Updates: It may be prudent to deal with the Quantal side first. The issue on Quantal is that 7.0.27 has an issue of FTBFS (Fails to build from Source). It may be prudent to talk to the MOTUs and see whether they'd support a sync to Quantal with the FTBFS included, and then backport from Quantal to Precise where it does build. This would require additional discussion with the MOTUs (in my opinion), either by someone here, or by myself, but if they're supportive of the idea of syncing with Quantal with the FTBFS issue for the sake of backporting to Precise (Note someone'd need to test build/run this), then unless any of you files the sync request, I'll file it. -- Also, if the FTBFS issue on Quantal has anything to do with Debian Bug #671999, then that will be available for sync sometime next week. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #671999 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671999 That is a friendly non-maintainer upload fixing the missing #include unistd.h everywhere that gcc 4.7 requests. Sadly, the patch that should be out is still in. The version I just asked Thorsten to be uploaded closes that bug and also this one (lp: 99179). To me, the way through Quantal is just fine. Debian does the same with backports.debian.org. What goes in there as a new package is also in unstable. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/10/2012 04:49 PM, Ben Giacalone wrote: Just tried to run your 7.27 on Dell 630 laptop which had no problem before 12.04 upgrade and I get computation error on all work units for Seti@home. Hi Ben, somewhere in this thread there is hidden a pointer to https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/boinc with a corrected version of BOINC by LocutusOfBorg. This should get you back to SETI. Projects that are not affected are Einstein@Home or Rosetta. Feel free to contribute to those until we have this sorted out here ... cannot take too long. Anyway, nice to meet you all in this thread. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, On 05/10/2012 05:16 PM, Ben Giacalone wrote: I just installed 7.0.27+dfsg-0~827~precise1 onto a Dell 630 laptop which had been running fine until 12.04 LTS upgrade. I am still getting computation error on (9) work units that just downloaded. This is unexpected. I presume this is the version that Lotucus created to prove the bug location. Sorry, then. As a quick fix, please try wget http://master.dermacloud.uni-luebeck.de/~moeller/oliver/boinc-client_7.0.27+dfsg-3_amd64.deb sudo dpkg -i boinc_client_7.0.27+dfsg-3_amd64.deb* *That was built with gcc 4.7 and Debian but I would expect to work nonetheless for 12.04. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/08/2012 07:12 PM, Dave wrote: Seti@home is down for its Tuesdsay maintenance. Should be up in a few hours. If your next build goes through Locutus I'll test it as soon as the project comes online. Good luck. Docking@Home was also affected. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/09/2012 03:12 AM, Dave wrote: Indeed. The am64 also has the bug. So that patch is definitely still an issue with 7.0.27, at least with Ubuntu. This is not expected. Have many thanks for identifying that. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/08/2012 11:56 PM, Dave wrote: So I don't wanna push anyone here, but can't we just put a 7.0.24 without the bad patch into the Ubuntu repository while we play with the 7.0.27? 7.0.24 is bad for many reasons, especially for an incompatibility with decent NVidia cards, no, please jump to 7.0.26 or later. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/07/2012 05:24 PM, Dave wrote: MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch is the culprit of the computation error issue. :-) I'm relieved that that one worked. . Please update to 7.0.27. I have the client working and that patch is in. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/08/2012 10:30 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: Unfortunately sometimes I have to sleep :) I'm building right now 7.0.27 with the patch parse_issues.patch disabled, since it doesn't build with it included (and as far as I can tell the patch has no problem), I have already filled a bug against bzr. With a little luck the package will build and upload in a few hours, I hope launchpad won't reject it because it has different content from the same revision (since I branched an older revision without my modifications). But don't you take it all from the git repository? That should have the series file and the patches adjusted. Took me a while :o/ Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/08/2012 11:02 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: According to this [1] which is based on your git [2] the patch isn't included, I see a #convinceDavid# MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch which is clearly commented. Right. I had not pushed. Sorry for that. I thought this patch was included upstream but I cannot find any reference in the source code files. I need another look at the patch. There once was a bug in boinc that produced non-executable scientific applications. And I found that this or something like it should be communicated better. That is what the patch is about. Is this the right git? [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~blueyed/boinc/pkg-boinc [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git Yes, it is fine. Here is the commitdiff that enables the patch http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=commitdiff;h=124c476cb5f04285fa044e1f3abd4bfc940e00ac Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
On 05/07/2012 04:03 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: So based on your last information seems to be MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch that causes this problem. This is weird. I have just compiled my 7.0.27 version with that patch in and this works nicely from what I see. Anyway. Jump over to 7.0.27 and then we see what happens. It may be an interaction of two patches ... but ... somewhat unlikely. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
And I just read Dave's reply that this would be just fine, indeed. If it is not the order of lines, then my hunch is that it is the size of the buffer that I had increased, which may create larger (too large) files for the client to read. I will split that patch in two halves - buffer and reorder - so we can test it all more easily. But I would do so for 7.0.28 and ... maybe even only through upstream and not within Debian/Ubuntu. Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 06 May 2012 00:13:12 - Von: LocutusOfBorg costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug Hi Steffen et all, I'm building I think the latest build, I have enabled almos every patch but not app_ipc_uninitialised.patch so based on Steffen comment we will find the patch that causes this problem :) -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 06 May 2012 16:03:30 - Von: Dave xclusive...@gmail.com An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug @ Locutus If this ppa has the patch Steffen thought was breaking it, we made need to re-think things a little... What are the differences, if any, between THIS ppa 7.0.26 that works (with that patch included), and the very first one I tried that was broke? You find 7.0.27 in the git repository and in the home directory of mine. I suggest to go with some additional motivation on that new version. I have not tested it with SETI, yet. Their 6.33MB app crawls with 4-8kb/s across the Atlantic. We should really find a way to have their application in boinc-app-seti distributed distributively through Debian/Ubuntu again :o) ... Update: the download made it and SETI works, albeit with a more minimal set of patches. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:21:37 - Von: LocutusOfBorg costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug Hi to all, unfortunately I cannot build the .27 from steffen git in launchpad. Previously I have thought that was due to a partial commit from Steffen, but now I see that this package builds with no errors at all in my local machine, so there should be something wrong with launchpad build system. In the meanwhile I try to figure out what's wrong I should tell that the patch is one of them: MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch client_types_buffer_size.patch uninitialised_client_types.patch MainDocumentConst.patch now I'm building a package without the 2nd and 3rd one... I just had a look again at the MainDocumentConst.patch . That patch can go. Upstream will not accept anything in that direction. I have removed it from the archive. Since the const flags are of interest for the inheritance of methode in C++, there may be a consequence in this patch that is not easy to spot. The const flag is excellent for any novice to learn about how some code works. That is why I like it ... It is not MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch, just tested. The client type ones I have removed in my transition to 7.0.27 as it seems. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, Have many thanks for all your energies going into it. The patches are listed in http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/series and of those my personal hunch is the have a second look at the app_ipc_uninitialised.patch, where I had improved (so I thought) initialisations of variables. Had you tried that one, yet? I have changed the order of lines in the init file ... not thinking that this makes much of difference .. but I may be wrong. If you have located the issue - fine. If not I suggest to leave it. Best, Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:37:27 - Von: Dave xclusive...@gmail.com An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug Another successful build. I'm not seeing the bug with this one either. :-) I'll be waiting for your next test. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:10 - Von: Dave xclusive...@gmail.com An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug and interesting, in the changelog for 7.0.27 I read compile fix... Don't really know what that means for you guys, but maybe it's good news? The bug is fixed by undoing some presumed improvements of mine. This needs some further investigation, but even if we fix it, all scientific apps would need an update, so ... Maybe we should just fine those aliens quickly and have them fix it all for us...or eradicate man kind. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, I can confirm this problem. I have only a hunch what may be wrong, most likely the boinc-client now produces lines in its communication with the scientific app that are complete - but too long. But I have to prove that, still. The problem occurred while I was excluding potential issues with the Einstein@Home scientific app, which had eventually been identified and fixed in upstream code of 7.0.26. Einstein@Home is not affected by this issue, please consider running that or Rosetta@Home until the update is in the archive. I had compiled the SETI App locally but that still shows that bug, so I am a bit puzzled. Go ahead with your patch-free version. For Debian I aim at 7.0.27 to have that addressed, which has seen a major update of our patches in the upstream codebase. ... should come out any time soon, now. Cheers, Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:09:15 - Von: LocutusOfBorg costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug HI Dave, I have just build a boinc 7.0.26 from another of my ppa's [1] and this is build with not patch at all (just three patch to make it build of course) Could you give it a try? With this version you shouldn't notice this bug, I'll release new version after you tell me if you see the bug or not until we figure out which of them causes the problem. Thanks [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive /locutusofborg-ppa -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug
Hello, Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2012 16:11:35 - Von: Dave xclusive...@gmail.com An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 computation error bug @Locutus. Will do, happily! It's just gonna take about 12 hours til some AP units finish up, I don't wanna risk ruining them. I'll report back. @Steffen, I believe 7.0.27 was released in the last couple days. :-) Yesterday night, I think? Thanks for the efforts guys! We all appreciate it. I can't wait to test the new ppa tonight Locutus. I just uploaded something that runs SETI for me to the archive. It is in the git repo and on http://master.dermacloud.uni- luebeck.de/~moeller/oliver I'll keep fiddling with it to locate the culprit. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991179 Title: 7.0.24 computation error bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 926891] Re: BOINC Manager can not be closed
On 03/29/2012 11:23 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed 7.0.23 has this fixed from what I observe. Coming. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926891 Title: BOINC Manager can not be closed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/926891/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 968021] Re: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt
On 03/29/2012 11:25 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/boinc I'm building 7.0.23 in my persona archive, and it will be available in a few hours. Please try this never version, from latest upstream 7.0.23 and few patches from Steffen (and a review from me, to fix a build error) I have now updated that patch with the omitted str_replace inclusion.. Concerning that stop, I made bad experiences on servers when having a working $DISPLAY in the ssh session, e.g. because of the -X argument to ssh. The BOINC client then happily uses the X screen saver library to find reasons not to compute. Could you verify that not to be the cause of your observation? Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968021 Title: boinc stops on error after a few days (md5_file: Too many open files) in stderrdae.txt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/968021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 955293] Re: boinc manager menu disappears
On 03/14/2012 11:04 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed I have no idea how to fix it. The problem does not appear when the client cannot connect to the server. It is repaired when the size of the window is changed. The problem still persists with 7.0.20 (just submitted to the git repository). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955293 Title: boinc manager menu disappears To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/955293/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 920554] Re: make_project crashed with ImportError in __main__: No module named boinc_path_config
On 02/16/2012 07:19 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: (no problem, just a suggestion: I built this boinc version for oneiric too) I admit not to have addressed that issue. It can be circumvented by setting the PYPATH environment variable, just like shown on the ServerGuide page on the wiki ... at least so I recall. What exactly needs to be done to get this all configured correctly ab initio I cannot tell. Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920554 Title: make_project crashed with ImportError in __main__: No module named boinc_path_config To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/920554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 49249] Re: Long project names result in clipped buttons
** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49249 Title: Long project names result in clipped buttons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/49249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905059] Re: 64bit version depends on X?
The dependency on X is intentional. There is no CUDA / OpenCL without X. And GPGPUs make up easily for those not installing the package any more because of X. And there were complaints about the boinc-client not detecting mouse movements, which only the X libraries detect. We could have - in very deep theory - a variant without any dependency on X. Pay me for it. Steffen ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Opinion ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905059 Title: 64bit version depends on X? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/905059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 905059] Re: 64bit version depends on X?
On 01/14/2012 10:23 PM, Leon Blakey wrote: So then if X is so needed then why is there no X dependencies in the 32 bit version? Thats more of what I'm asking For mere computation, the boinc-client package does not need X. For sensing user interaction when X is running, it does. And there was a bug reported earlier about that. And if there is no reason, then since 32 bit land is fine without gpu packages, No, it is not fine. There is plenty of 32bit GPU projects out there. Milkyway and Einstein@Home among them. what is seriously preventing a boinc-client-gpu package? Time? Effort? Care? You mean a boinc-client-X. I already placed cuda and opencl packages, which just drag in the extra dependencies, frequently not so obvious to the casual user. Effort. And this also means the effort to compile it all when a new version comes out. A patch would need to come with a new maintainer. The RFH is out since a couple of years. Triaging. I can do more important bits on other packages. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905059 Title: 64bit version depends on X? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/905059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 655139] Re: Boinc GPU tasks all end with Computation Error after update to NVidia 260.19.06 proprietary drivers
Hello, On 12/24/2011 05:18 AM, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: [Expired for boinc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired expiring bugs are not what you should see, but frankly, there is little point in investigating anything like that when it is not against the latest version (7.0.3) currently packaged for some .deb. Thanks Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655139 Title: Boinc GPU tasks all end with Computation Error after update to NVidia 260.19.06 proprietary drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/655139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 655139] Re: Boinc GPU tasks all end with Computation Error after update to NVidia 260.19.06 proprietary drivers
On 12/26/2011 01:07 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: @Steffen I agree with you but I have to say that I've personally experienced this bug in the older 6.10 releases and the bug were already reported by me before the opening of this one! (I were not experiencing anymore this bug because ubuntu lacks of a boinc update package! backporting and updating the ubuntu boinc package seems to be too hard for ubuntu developers ;) upstream works a lot on GPU support these days. An update of the Ubuntu packages would indeed help a lot. I suggest you talk to Daniel directly about helping him with those not-yet-official BOINC packages. The PPA is at https://launchpad.net/~pkg-boinc/+archive/ppa and offers the last version officially announced as stable, if I am not erroneous. That we have the interim versions for Debian is mostly because they were needed for the Einstein@home's own cluster, which I personally find very rewarding. I just wished they would run the popularity-contest on those machines :o) . so many of those bugs here on lp are already fixed upstream But backporting those fixes is either considered important by upstream (and then you get it through the PPA) or the Debian/Ubuntu packages should not care either. Chat to Daniel. Best, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655139 Title: Boinc GPU tasks all end with Computation Error after update to NVidia 260.19.06 proprietary drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/655139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 905059] [NEW] 64bit version depends on X?
Hallo, Is it necessary for the x64 version of the *client* to depend on programs and libraries that provide X functionality? And if it does, why does the x86 version not depend on them? The dependencies for the 64bit version I presume to be auto-added by the dh_shlibdeps program. Maybe this was uploaded manually and not auto-rebuilt? With 7.0.3 there will be a dependency on Xss to help the boinc client spot the movement of the mouse. This will then drag in the X libs for all platforms. There is a conflict of interest here. We have bug reports for either side. Since AMD and CUDA do both need X libraries, and those contributions I presume to easily outweight those who might not want to run the BOINC client because of the now added dependencies on X, I decided to go for it. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905059 Title: 64bit version depends on X? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/905059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608917] Re: Please put Provides fields mimicking Debian packages
Hm. Maybe. I thought that this way it would be even easier for someone to know what to pick. I would rather add another boinc-nvidia-opencl package at the very moment. And: for anyone with a working set of dependencies the regular boinc package is already sufficient. I admit not to have completely grasped the role of OpenCL with Nvidia hardware, yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608917 Title: Please put Provides fields mimicking Debian packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/608917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 410809] Re: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non-free/multiverse?)
Hello,
On 12/05/2011 09:07 PM, Daniel Hahler wrote:
The dependencies are not satisfied in Ubuntu (different packages for the
binary drivers).
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/608917 for the request to get Provides
for the nvidia ones.
That ones says not to be existing. Could you please just edit it? I do not
have the hardware.
fglrx-driver gets provided by fglrx in Ubuntu,
I'll make it fglrx-driver|fglrx then. It is the same as for older versions of
Debian.
but amd-libopencl1 is not found. What would be required here?
This rather recent, I think. An alternative would be amd-app,
which is not in the distribution by provided in the forums.
Package: boinc-amd-opencl
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, boinc, fglrx-driver, amd-libopencl1
For the moment I could imagine to use nvidia-current/nvidia-current-
updates for the nvidia dependencies
Sounds good. Does Debian have the same one? Just go for it, please.
and maybe just fglrx for boinc-
amd-opencl,
That is not sufficient. fglrx is just the 3D driver. For OpenCL you need more.
Leave the AMD side to me. I can test that one.
but in the long run there should not be a delta between
Ubuntu and Debian just because of this.
The problem is more between versions of the distro, I presume.
Have many thanks!!
Steffen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410809
Title:
Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non-
free/multiverse?)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/410809/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 820246] Re: boinc-client service should start after gdm
On 12/03/2011 07:43 PM, Jérôme wrote: Maybe we could add the below lines to the file /etc/init/boinc-client.conf on oneiric version : --- description BOINC core Client start on (runlevel [45] and filesystem and login-session-start) stop on (desktop-shutdown or runlevel [!45]) ... --- I am afraid I need an explicit patch for me to guess what to do :) There is no /etc/init on my system. Daniel? Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820246 Title: boinc-client service should start after gdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/820246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 410809] Re: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non-free/multiverse?)
On 12/02/2011 04:09 PM, Daniel Hahler wrote: libcuda.so is shipped with nvidia-current / nvidia-current-updates in Ubuntu. I don't know if just installing them is enough, when using the nouveau driver (instead of nvidia) for display though. The just released (to Debian unstable) version 7.0.2 of BOINC comes with two additional packages, i.e. boinc-nvidia-cuda and boinc-amd-opencl. Those drag in the additinal libraries they need, which should be equivalent to your suggestion. Best, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410809 Title: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non- free/multiverse?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/410809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820246] Re: boinc-client service should start after gdm
Those run levels are interpreted differently across distributions as it seems. I have further changed above dependencies to ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: boinc # Required-Start:$all # Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs # Should-Start: x11-common, network-manager, gdm, kdm, dbus # Should-Stop: x11-common # Default-Start: 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 2 3 6 # Short-Description: BOINC core client # Description: core client for the BOINC distributed computing #infrastructure ### END INIT INFO And if this does not do it then organise a CUDA machine to be donated to me, please, or someone please send the right patch. Steffen ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820246 Title: boinc-client service should start after gdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/820246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378067] Re: Clicking on help button results in unparsable URL
There was some work on string copy functions why may have contributed to something. Reopen the bug if you find this to happen past 6.13.12. ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378067 Title: Clicking on help button results in unparsable URL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/378067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362079] Re: boincmgr crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoPopupMenu()
I just tagged it as Fix released. Later versions don't show this, so I presume to be kind of ok to say. ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362079 Title: boincmgr crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoPopupMenu() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/362079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888612] Re: BOINC stops and never continues in Oneiric
There is now 6.13.12 in unstable. Daniel - would you volunteer to adopt it for the PPA? I was experimenting a bit with the runlevels. An update is likely to happen any time soon, depending on all your feedback. Best, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888612 Title: BOINC stops and never continues in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/888612/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 820246] Re: boinc-client service should start after gdm
On 11/12/2011 07:01 PM, Jérôme wrote: It seems that the boinc client still be launched at early steps : -- j@lu64:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 11.10 Release: 11.10 Codename: oneiric j@lu64:~$ ls /etc/rc5.d/ README S20virtualbox-guest-utils S99grub-common S99rc.local S20boinc-client S75sudoS99ondemand j@lu64:~$ -- Maybe a 'S98boinc-client' link name would be more efficient. Correct me if I am wrong (well, you will correct me, I have little doubt), but those link names I understand to be set at install time, not by the package. $ head -13 debian/*boinc*init #! /bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: boinc # Required-Start:$all # Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 # Short-Description: BOINC core client # Description: core client for the BOINC distributed computing #infrastructure ### END INIT INFO While looking at this ... we do not need boinc to start on 2 and 3, right? And should we possibly stop at 2 ? Cheers, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820246 Title: boinc-client service should start after gdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/820246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 888612] Re: BOINC stops and never continues in Oneiric
6.13.10 has issues, too - just very different ones. Let's wait for 6.13.11 and then backport when this turns out to be stable. Anybody feeling like providing a package for 6.12.34? Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888612 Title: BOINC stops and never continues in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/888612/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 888612] Re: BOINC stops and never continues in Oneiric
On 11/10/2011 10:17 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: correction, after a look on the checkin_notes I see the changes between 33 and 34 are affecting only windows and mac users Hm. I recall there was _something_ for us, too. Leaky brain. Anyway, I was not overly enthused back then and am fairly confident that it is indeed the memcpy issues that would hit us even more with earlier versions (in combination with a recent libc). Best, Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888612 Title: BOINC stops and never continues in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/888612/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 128357] Re: boinc does not idle with mouse movement
On 11/01/2011 07:16 PM, Daniel Hahler wrote: With X on about every machine, I could live with that change. Servers usually do not have X installed, but I would be glad to give a test-build a spin. Apart from that, it may make sense to have a package for servers and another one for GUI/X clients. I had thought about that, but I am feeling sufficiently busy already. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128357 Title: boinc does not idle with mouse movement To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/128357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 410809] Re: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non-free/multiverse?)
On 11/01/2011 11:14 PM, Papamatti wrote: The libraries libcuda.so and libOpenCL.so are in /usr/lib/nvidia-current. Boinc should see this: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version unknown, CUDA version 4000, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, 608 GFLOPS peak) I'm just looking for new tasks from milkyway@home, but they had a hard servercrash so there are still no GPU workunits. Hope i can test it soon. It does ... sometimes :) Try xhost + sudo /etc/init.d/boinc stop sudo /etc/init.d/boinc stop sudo usermod -a -G boinc video How about now? Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410809 Title: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non- free/multiverse?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/410809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 410809] Re: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non-free/multiverse?)
On 10/25/2011 01:51 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: I don't understand why do you need this library. Doesn't boinc download automatically it when needed? There is a separate package for it but BOINC does not (and should not IMHO) depend on it. I happily accept patches that help the detection of any such setups. I have added libcuda1, libcuda1-ia32 [amd64] to the suggests of debian/control. Better ideas? Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410809 Title: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non- free/multiverse?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/410809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 128357] Re: boinc does not idle with mouse movement
On 04/20/2011 12:08 AM, Christian Lins wrote: Please note that the latest upstream patch for this issue requires special buildparameters (--with-xss or something) which links the binary agains libxss (X screen saver idle detection). AFAIK this is not done in Debian because they don't want a command line client depending on a X library (a system without GUI does not suffer from this issue though). A solution to this would be to deliver a special boinc binary with the boinc-manager package. Hm. With X on about every machine, I could live with that change. A problem with any such setup is most certainly independent from the actual distribution. Is anyone on the Ubuntu side unhappy about trying a --with-xss? I am about to work on a package for 6.13.10, which could then just have it. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128357 Title: boinc does not idle with mouse movement To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/128357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 587426] Re: No GPU found
Hello, On 10/09/2011 01:14 AM, northa wrote: The bug still exists. in 6.12.33 in 11.10. When doing $sudo /etc/init.d /boinc-client restart the GPUs will be found so its a workaround. In the meantime I have managed to confirm this behaviour on a machine at work - yes. Mighty annoying. I just don't have any good idea about what to do now now. On thing could be to send machines with CUDA/OpenCL-savvy GPUs and Ubuntu to the upstream developers. But somehow I feel they don't really know what to do either. Ideas are welcome. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587426 Title: No GPU found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/587426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 845509] Re: error 403 forbidden al actualizar repositorio
No idea what you might possibly mean here. ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845509 Title: error 403 forbidden al actualizar repositorio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/845509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540415] Re: mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid
Hello, could you please investigate again with mgltools- pmv_1.5.6~rc1+cvs.20110617-2? I have just uploaded that to unstable and it should solved the issue you are refering to. If there is a larger crowd wishing to work with the MGLtools on Lucid, then we (or someone from that crowd) should go and possibly provide those packages on the Debian Med PPA. ** Changed in: mgltools-pmv (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540415 Title: mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-pmv/+bug/540415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484295] Re: pmv crashes when loading
2.6.x of mgltools-pmv no longer crashes, please give it a try. It wil lnot be available for 9.10, though, unless when you contribute it to the Debian Med PPA, to which you are wholeheartedly invited. ** Changed in: mgltools-pmv (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484295 Title: pmv crashes when loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-pmv/+bug/484295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484295] Re: pmv crashes when loading
I had meant 1.5.6~rc1+cvs.20110617-2 .. sorry. SM -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484295 Title: pmv crashes when loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-pmv/+bug/484295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590280] Re: Conflicts in python-sip version: BALLView requires 4.10, lucid provides 4.10.1
Try again with 1.4.0 that is now in unstable and the Debian Med PPA. ** Changed in: ball (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590280 Title: Conflicts in python-sip version: BALLView requires 4.10, lucid provides 4.10.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ball/+bug/590280/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694572] Re: package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 630125 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630125 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 630125 package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694572 Title: package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torque/+bug/694572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630125] Re: package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1
The two are in conflict, indeed. The debian package I found to explicitly mention the conflict at least since 2.4.9. Most groups will only have a single queueing system, but, hey, at least during a transition period the installation of both is not unlikely. So, this conflict is truly unfortunate. I do not have any good solution. The alternative system does not apply since this would require the different queues to actually have the same semantics between different queueing system. qsub is also with sge, no? Bug 694572 reports the same problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630125 Title: package torque-client (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/qalter', which is also in package gridengine-client 0:6.2u4-2ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torque/+bug/630125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441063] Re: torque-gui: /usr/lib/xpbs/tclIndex and /usr/lib/xpbsmon/tclIndex point to non-existent files
** Changed in: torque (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441063 Title: torque-gui: /usr/lib/xpbs/tclIndex and /usr/lib/xpbsmon/tclIndex point to non-existent files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torque/+bug/441063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765934] Re: ball version 1.3.2-2ubuntu3 failed to build on i386
Hello, 1.3.x is history. The Debian Med PPA has 1.4.0 for Lucid and Natty at https://launchpad.net/~debian-med/+archive/ppa Some more exotic platforms on Debian fail, but for a very different reason. It should all be just fine for the next transfer from unstable to Oneiric. ** Changed in: ball (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765934 Title: ball version 1.3.2-2ubuntu3 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ball/+bug/765934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674564] Re: Broken package error when installing mgltools-pyautodock and mgltools-vision from the repository
We are currently rebuilding it all for Debian. A version that apparently works for me is currently in unstable. What flavour of Ubuntu are you using? There might be a volunteer to fast-track the mgltools-* packages to the Debian Med PPA. This bug should then be of the past. ** Changed in: mgltools-pyautodock (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674564 Title: Broken package error when installing mgltools-pyautodock and mgltools- vision from the repository To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-pyautodock/+bug/674564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500453] Re: crashes upon launch; ClippingPlane index out of range
** Changed in: mgltools-dejavu (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500453 Title: crashes upon launch; ClippingPlane index out of range To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mgltools-dejavu/+bug/500453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560143] Re: BOINC for amd64 should depend on the libc6-i386 or ia32-libs
The answer is to add the architecture name in braces. 6.12.32+ shall bring it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560143 Title: BOINC for amd64 should depend on the libc6-i386 or ia32-libs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/560143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560143] Re: BOINC for amd64 should depend on the libc6-i386 or ia32-libs
After reading through http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366741, which expresses a fierce opposition to a dependency on the ia32 libs, I have now changed my mind and will leave it with the recommends. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560143 Title: BOINC for amd64 should depend on the libc6-i386 or ia32-libs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boinc/+bug/560143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560143] Re: BOINC for amd64 should depend on the libc6-i386 or ia32-libs
Could someone please help me with a patch that would keep the package
functional on non Intel|AMD machines?
One can recommend about everything, but to truly depend on it ... donno.
Today, the setting is
Package: boinc-client
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python (= 2.3), adduser,
ca-certificates
Suggests: boinc-app-seti, boinc-manager, x11-xserver-utils, ia32-libs
Package: boinc-manager
Section: x11
Recommends: boinc-client, ia32-libs
Suggests: libgl1-mesa-glx, libxt6
and this is motivated by the observation that the scientific
applications themselves are commonly completely static while the
graphics often explicitly needs the 32 bit variant. Am I wrong? What
projects are making those problems?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560143
Title:
BOINC for amd64 should depend on the libc6-i386 or ia32-libs
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 782496] Re: boinc crashes with *** buffer overflow detected *** on startup
On 05/15/2011 09:41 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: this bug seems to be fixed here. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/23529 Confirmed. I'll upload a new version as soon as I see it announced on the download site. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782496 Title: boinc crashes with *** buffer overflow detected *** on startup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 782496] [NEW] boinc crashes with *** buffer overflow detected *** on startup
Hi Swen, have many thanks for your report! On 05/14/2011 04:21 AM, Swen Kühnlein wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: boinc Boinc crashes a few seconds after starting with the following last lines on stdout: ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: boinc-client 6.10.59+dfsg-0ubuntu1 Can you please try the 6.12.x series from Daniel's repository and try with that again? Upstream will certainly also address something for 6.10.59, which is the current stable version, but ... it would need to be reproducible. Is it? Also, I need to say that the debug information I found not so very usable. Did you also have boinc-dbg installed? This would help. Many greetings Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782496 Title: boinc crashes with *** buffer overflow detected *** on startup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 782496] Re: boinc crashes with *** buffer overflow detected *** on startup
Hi Swen, have many thanks for rerunning with symbols. @David: It's two bugs, confirmed on both 6.12.18 and 6.12.59 with Ubuntu. It is apparently caused by a circular path below /sys leading to an exceeded length of some internal path representation. The first bug is that the recursion was not noted (ten years ago I contributed that for WINE by collecting the inodes that have been visited, there may be better ideas now). The second bug is that BOINC should just spot the long path before there memory issue happens. Best regards, Steffen On 05/14/2011 02:34 PM, Swen Kühnlein wrote: Hi, boinc always crashes when it starts; I can provide my /var/lib/boinc- client dir if this is needed to reproduce. I've installed boinc-dbg now and ran boinc in gdb. Looking at the stack backtrace the problem seems to be related to long paths inside the .wine directory (didn't even know boinc uses wine): (gdb) bt #0 0x76465d05 in raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x76469ab6 in abort () at abort.c:92 #2 0x7649ed7b in __libc_message (do_abort=2, fmt=0x76585b23 *** %s ***: %s terminated\n) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:189 #3 0x765301d7 in __fortify_fail (msg=0x76585aba buffer overflow detected) at fortify_fail.c:32 #4 0x7652f0f0 in __chk_fail () at chk_fail.c:29 #5 0x7652e569 in _IO_str_chk_overflow (fp=0x6f7a, c=28538) at vsprintf_chk.c:35 #6 0x764a6b98 in _IO_default_xsputn (f=0x7fff9d50, data=value optimized out, n=8) at genops.c:485 #7 0x7647931d in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=value optimized out, format=value optimized out, ap=value optimized out) at vfprintf.c:1620 #8 0x7652e604 in ___vsprintf_chk ( s=0x7fff9f60 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., flags=1, slen=256, format=0x472171 %s/%s, args=0x7fff9e70) at vsprintf_chk.c:86 #9 0x7652e54a in ___sprintf_chk (s=value optimized out, flags=value optimized out, slen=value optimized out, format=value optimized out) at sprintf_chk.c:33 #10 0x00462503 in sprintf ( dirpath=0x7fffa1b0 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffa1a8, recurse=true) at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:35 #11 dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffa1b0 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffa1a8, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:385 #12 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffa400 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffa3f8, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:389 #13 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffa650 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffa648, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:389 #14 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffa8a0 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffa898, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:389 #15 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffaaf0 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffaae8, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:389 #16 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffad40 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsyst..., size=@0x7fffad38, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:389 #17 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffaf90 ./.wine/dosdevices/z:/sys/devices/platform/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy/subsystem/devices/reg-dummy, size=@0x7fffaf88, recurse=true) at filesys.cpp:389 #18 0x0046252a in dir_size ( dirpath=0x7fffb1e0
[Bug 587426] Re: No GPU found
Hello, Skip had sent me a pointer to his summary on the BOINC forums on the matter and I have followed your all's instructions. So, when 6.12.23+ comes out, this should also auto-detect your graphics card. Many thanks to you all. Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587426 Title: No GPU found -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 587426] Re: No GPU found
** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587426 Title: No GPU found -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525241] Re: Move to upstart for initscript
Done, I tend to think. Closing this with 6.12.23+. ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525241 Title: Move to upstart for initscript -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414244] Re: BOINC should run later than gdm
It does not work any longer with the introduction of auto-detected dependencies. Version 6.12.23+ will have this fixed. ** Changed in: boinc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414244 Title: BOINC should run later than gdm -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410809] Re: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non-free/multiverse?)
Is any of these packages packages here libcuda1-ia32 - NVIDIA CUDA runtime library (32-bit) libcuda1 - NVIDIA CUDA runtime library libnvcuvid1 - NVIDIA CUDA nvcuvid runtime library libnvidia-compiler-ia32 - NVIDIA runtime compiler library (32-bit) libnvidia-compiler - NVIDIA runtime compiler library providing what you need? Then those could be suggested, indeed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410809 Title: Please include libcudart.so in the boinc package (non- free/multiverse?) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362079] Re: boincmgr crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoPopupMenu()
Is this bug still reproducible with 6.12.22? I would otherwise tend to just close it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362079 Title: boincmgr crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoPopupMenu() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 595396] Re: boincmgr crashes in Lucid 1st time its run, when trying to attach to a project
Hello, Debian and Ubuntu are working together for BOINC (and elsewhere). The bug was fixed by upstream recently. Please investigate 6.10.59 (when you see it) and 6.12.18 may have it already, too. For Ubuntu check out https://launchpad.net/~pkg-boinc/+archive/ppa For Debian it is in unstable (should also work with Testing) and should soon be available also for backports. Many thanks for your efforts Steffen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595396 Title: boincmgr crashes in Lucid 1st time its run, when trying to attach to a project -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
